papa joe stalin of Stalinist stanistan I think its because the khoi and san were mainly hunter gatherers. The bantu only arrived in 300 AD and together with some Cushitic people started a naval culture. Which became the Swahili Coast City States later on.
One criticism: I'm not an expert, but I'm pretty sure there were lots of huge land bridges which aren't shown (such as between Britain and Europe) which enabled early humans to settle there.
On my main channel, I make videos with subtitles in 3 languages for old music of different nations. You are also invited. :) th-cam.com/video/TwoZacagf7c/w-d-xo.html
Yeah, the video only shows the movement of humans on a modern map (and only one species of humans). It would be a whole other challenge to change the map too.
@@wildschwein9066 lmao so I'm religious AND communist?!? lmfaooo Why not just say I'm into Kulturbolschewismus :while we're at it? Anyways, are you tracking every comment I make here? Why are you so obssessed w/ me?????
@@Euthenon The phenotypes are randomly chosen. Why is skin color (who can change) chosen but not blood type (who doesn't change) or eye color? The criteria for each race are completely made up and conveniently only include the peoples European colonizers wanted to exploit for their free labour. Also, we're literally all in the same haplogroup and no one uses that to determine race. Ever.
@@wildschwein9066 So you're saying white people are not truly humans. Interesting... Anyways, there are Black people with natural blue eyes and who are born with blonde hair and there are plenty of white folks who don't have both. Besides, do you know what /pol/ is?
@@AD-yq8rl Which genocide? Genocide is organized planned killing, in the Americas most natives were either killed by plagues (not willingly brought) or intermarried with Spaniards & mixed away. Some localized massacres happened, but there was never a genocide masterplan, historically speaking
It's interesting how Australia was first settled tens of thousands of years earlier than when the Americas were first settled, but New Zealand hadn't seen a human until less than a thousand years ago.
Yes, but they arrived late. You must watch the video to the end. In Iceland it is marked with light grey after 860 and Madagascar with grey/yellow after 200 BC
Carlo Canti Well.Firstly, that’s not funny and I don’t see any pattern to fun with. Secondly, your name is latin originated and you’re most probably from a Latin Country.I hope you do know that what’s happening in Mexican-American border and how Trump is behaving your people. So then don’t cry if you get discrimanted.
On my main channel, I make videos with subtitles in 3 languages for old music of different nations. You are also invited. :) th-cam.com/video/TwoZacagf7c/w-d-xo.html
On my main channel, I make videos with subtitles in 3 languages for old music of different nations. You are also invited. :) th-cam.com/video/TwoZacagf7c/w-d-xo.html
On my main channel, I make videos with subtitles in 3 languages for old music of different nations. You are also invited. :) th-cam.com/video/TwoZacagf7c/w-d-xo.html
The clock (top right) begins running at 300,000 years ago, and the map depicts the first spread out of Africa about 270,000. Most scientists date Homo sapiens sapiens [sic] (the modern version of us) about 200,000 years ago. Homo *sapiens* means that he did not attempt to map other hominin Homo species, and definitely not chimps (Pan troglodytes).
@@stupidmonkey1015 I think you're probably right. His English is vastly superior to my non-existent Ukrainian, but I didn't initially suspect he meant the future tense.
I noticed how there was a period from 1:01 - 1:51 where a population of human were separated from other human in the Eastern Mediterranean for a very long period of time but went extinct. Given such a long scale of time they must have evolved into a pretty different phenotype. Who are these people and I wonder how they looked like.
We won't stop fighting while there is such an uneven distribution of wealth and resources. Heck, very few countries can even afford to invest in space exploration to start with.
The Sahara desert didnt exist a hunderthousand years ago. There was only jungel and savanna there, so humans could live there. Then the climate changed and the land turned to desert, and with that humans also left.
@@MK-rw1on It's actually a cycle that happens every few thousands years. The Sahara would eventually be a tropical rainforest again in the few thousand years from now (but it might change as the climate change disrupts the cycle)
@@arvantsaraihan5777 If that was true then you would see layers and layers of that in Sahara area which is not the way it is. The only evidence is that was not a desert at one point not that it desert then not desert in cycle. Landscape cannot be a in cycle as the volcanoes, continental plates shift, some new areas are created which there were not there before, like huge islands, mountains, etc and other disappear completely.
It is actually realy nice how we rule the world . We are maybe not the same but we are all humans after all.our ancestors is amazing and im proud of it.
Celt of Canaan Esurix There’s two possible origins I believe for the family and they’re both really equally weighed. So it’s going to be a hard to choice.
Hey! At 2:55 You showed the sapiens migrating into the Eurasian steppes via Anatolia. But didn't the first sapiens that travelled out of Africa, went through the Arabian Coast, crossing the gulf, through the Persian coastline till the end of Indian coastline then reaching the Andaman islands, from there finally making it to the Malayan archipelago? As what I remember from what I have read, this migration happened before the steppes. Oblige to share your thoughts if I miss something here. Cheers!
@brahmastra brahmastra quit it dude, you keep spewing nationalistic views that are only from the bias and perspective of your people. Not everything is about you
I agree with Kxnyshk. The first Sapiens peopled the torrid area and arrived in Australia before going north. The video has no scientific bases and is totally wrong in the depiction. The answer of Achilleuspetreas3828 is a typical fallacy in that not the argument is questioned, but the alleged nationalism of the argument's author: I don't know what nationalism has to do with this.
Do videos about the Iberian Reconquista and also the language families of Afroasiatic, Nilo Saharan, Mande, Niger, Congo, and Khoesan languages. That will compensate for the lack of videos about Africa.
Great video:) the colors are very accurate!! However wouldn't the first modern Homo sapiens leave Africa c. 70,000 years ago? After the taba eruption, through the strait of Yemen. All earlier attempts to leave Africa (before 70 Kya) failed.
It seems that he came to Europe in two waves. The first was very early and the only sample is currently finds in the cave Apidima in Greece. For the second wave we know it was before 40,000 but it is unknown when it started.
Would've been cool to see how the land changed at the same time. You can kind of infer where the land bridges were but actually having them on the map would've been better I think
On my main channel, I make videos with subtitles in 3 languages for old music of different nations. You are also invited. :) th-cam.com/video/TwoZacagf7c/w-d-xo.html
You're excellent. Subtle, with New Zealand, Polynesia, Djibouti's strait crossing. Even a great mapping of ethnicities' migrations. It was heartbreaking for me to watch the orange, that's been there for so much time, almost vanish in a few seconds of video.
I wonder how our ancestors lived 50 thousand years ago. Like we know they did not have civilization and were hunter gatherers but I wonder how it would be if a modern human spent 1 week with our prehistoric ancestors
Where did you get the data for the different races portrayed on the map? Seems a little unconvincing. Like how you have everyone in Sub-Saharan Africa (besides the Kalahari desert) are the same race and being identical to the people of Eastern India and Australia? You also have them identical to the East Africans and Horn Africans who are very diverse. You have the Nilotic peoples who are markedly darker and phenotypically different and the Horn African people who are much lighter on average. Even ignoring all of my other observations that still wouldn't make sense because the Bantu didn't expand into most of Africa until very recently in history. Prior to that, the majority of the continent was inhabited by Khoisan people, from the southern cape all the way up to the great lakes region. And Central Africa by pygmies.
Maybe if you have finished all the languages videos you can do the whole world languages (like the whole globe and all languages in your previous videos) though that would take a while just an idea though
Yeah, great video but would be even better with showing Bering land bridge, Sundaland, Doggerland, etc. Notes for significant events like green Sahara, glacial maximum, Mongol invasion, plagues, European colonialism, world wars, etc., would also be excellent.
On my main channel, I make videos with subtitles in 3 languages for old music of different nations. You are also invited. :) th-cam.com/video/TwoZacagf7c/w-d-xo.html
i would like to point out some points that seem like mistakes, also one general big mistake, as it stands for modern humans, the earliet migration of humans from africa to eurasia that survived to today is the one that left from djibouti to yemen some 70K years ago, they did this 20K years before the migration through the sinai to the middle east. at 2:41 you show the second and final entry to eurasia through sinai, that one however has occurred some 50K years ago, not 100K. at 2:53 you show that the the arrival to central asia was through the pontic step when in fact it was through north eastern iran, not only that, you show that this migration happened some 85K years ago when it happened more like 40K years ago. at 3:12 you show that humans arrived to north eastern china through the population that lived in north and central asia, that is in fact not correct, the population that went to china arrived through india, and that only happened around 45K years ago, not 70K years ago as you show at 3:23 humans by now have already arrived in western australia and have crossed indonesia some 10K years earlier, in your map they are still stuck on the malay peninsula (which might i add was then connected to a much greater landmass since the sea levels were lower.) also i'd like to ask exactly what those divisions towards the end are, are those ethnic groups? haplogroups? "races"? because the map you show does not fit any of these. i'm not sure what definition you have for "human" (since in pre-history there were more than one human species) but this does not fit the known migration of homo sapiens i appreciate the graphic and the effort put in however, taking such a monumental task is not for the faint of heart
Thank you for the remarks. Feedback is useful to improve of my work. All above points have an important uncertainty, because there are a lot alternative theories
On my main channel, I make videos with subtitles in 3 languages for old music of different nations. You are also invited. :) th-cam.com/video/TwoZacagf7c/w-d-xo.html
Austronesians were really good at navigating the ocean, that's why they were the first to also discover most of the tiny Pacific Islands and inhabit them
Just wondering, how do you find this much detailed information? I also think of starting mapping but i have some problems with research. Anyways, great video as always! Greetings from turkey 👋
Pangea Play what does that have to do with anything, if you mean my name I wasn’t even thinking of that when I made it up, it’s supposed to reflect my dual heritage, and the fact that some late Roman client kings in judea had Galatian mercenaries just like the Ptolemies
The video has no scientific basis. 'Homo sapiens' peopled first the torrid zone until Australia, not Anatolia and the steppes. You only have to read the Wikipedia article with a lot of scientific references. The artistic part is very nice, but you should get well-informed before doing such works based on scientific research, or at least give references.
Austronesians, not Australians (the colors are slightly different, more black for Australians, Papua and Melanesians and more yellow for Austronesians)
South eastern Africa was inhabited by hunter gatherers. It wasn’t until the bantu expansion and they reached southern/eastern Africa in 300 AD did they start a naval culture with other groups like the Cushitic people farther north.
Great video! Is there anyway you could do one with homo sapians alongside other hominids such homo erectus and Neanderthals to give is a clearer idea as to how the colours changed.
In the Ice Ages, also animate the rise and fall of sea level :: 2 critical areas in the spread of early Man are Beringia and Sundaland, which now are submerged. en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beringia/wiki/Sunda_Shelf
It's sad to see the disappearence of the native americans. With the discovery of America, Europeans brought in some really nasty deseases (like pox, or typhus) and the natives had like zero immunity against those. Tenochtitla was revaged, and so was the Inca Empire - before Pizzaro even discovered it, since the desease moved faster than the conquistadors themselves.
Amazing video, but I’m curious on why you showed the West and East eurasians diverging in the Caucasus and the South Asians migrating later through Arabia. Didn’t the south Asians split from east Eurasians?
Indeed, I didn't understand some gaps among populated areas (separating them, after also the "buffer" zones had been shown populated before) which are shown, somewhere, before historical ages. Some of them appear due to glacial ages, but others are beyond my comprehension. For instance: why the North African Atlas mountains (and all of Maghreb, I dare say) are shown populated, then not (for a long period)? And why that early gap between a populated South and South-Western Africa and East Africa?
Imagine all those ancient people trying to understand the concept of 2000's A.C. People watching how they spread in just 6 minutes of video on our phones-
I don’t think it is appropriate to show the term “race” based on color since it is not widely accepted by anthropologists. Race is a biological concept and it is severely different than ethnicity. Humans are a race by its own, and there are no sub-races of humanity since there was no enough evolutionary time and communal seclusion of communities that allow the emergence of human sub-races, i think it would be better not to show color variations in your video. Other than that, I appreciate that you showed the latest Sapiens discovery in Morocco.
There's more genetic variation between human races than there is between some scientifically recognized subspecies of wolves and bears. Anthropologists can easily classify humans into distinct (and medically relevant) racial categories based on facial features, skeletal structure, hair texture, bone density, etc.
It was necessary to show the origin of the settlers in different parts of the world. The color easily and immediately reveals the place of origin of each group of settlers.
Dan Not here to start a discussion but as an anthropology student, I need to disagree with your comment. We cannot observe such variations due to, I hate to repeat, there is no enough evolutionary time and space for humans to become distinct sub-species. So whenever we find a burial site which has overlapping “racial” features of its native area, there are also others which do not overlap with the area. Carbon based analisis also do not support such claims as they do in dogs, for example.
Costas Melas I think showing the “race” makes that video different than the other “Homosapiens migration” videos so that’s cool I think.Good job Costas.
The common ancestor of Ethiopians, Somalis, Eritreans, Oromos, Amharas, Tigrayans, Copts and Berbers appeared in North Africa sixty thousand years ago.
@Default Profile Picture but native Americans knew there land.. and now we are calling the native Americans as mayans and navajo tribes And the Alexander of Macedonia came to fought with india in nearly 330 BCE. It is the brits who came to know the world lately.. and they wanted to make there UK as highlight.. so that's why because of them these things we're studying wrong as in part of history and geography 😉
@Default Profile Picture ,that is in the European pont of view , and native Americans had somuch knowledge, they were not hunter gatherers, they had a good advanced civilization, for example mayans, inkans, Aztecs, navajos etc
@Default Profile Picture ,yes in the same way how Europeans didn't had a idea about America's You have a good knowledge about natives, which country you are , I also researched so much about natives , mainly mayans and inkas , I got least information about aboriginals and tasmanians, I feel very sad for natives, they should get some of their land back
ok so I don't know how accurate this is but if humans truly arrived to south america 13k years ago all those native languages, quechua and amazon languages alike, absolutely have to be reconstructable to one language family and proto-language
Isolation creates larger language differences. Natives did not have alot of contact between groups and were seperated by geography so their languages diverged, versus in europe all of the Indo-european languages were constantly in contact and changed together
Μπορείς να κάνεις κάποιο βίντεο που θα σχετίζεται με τους ινδοευρωπαιους. Δηλαδή πως ξεκίνησαν, από που προήλθαν, που μετανάστευσαν κλπ??? Πάντως, πολύ καλό βίντεο όπως πάντα, μπράβο.
Did our species really originate 300 ky ago? I thought 100 ky to 200 ky was the most accurate estimate for anatomically modern humans, and 70 ky for behaviorally modern humans.
Well recently some human fossils have been found that were later identified as homo sapiens (300,000 years old), even though they also show obvious archaic traits. Tbh a specific 'start' of our species can't be exactly pinpointed, since h. sapiens evolved probably from african h. heidelbergensis (h. rhodensis) and that is a slow gradual process. Bassically older h. sapiens fossils look more and more archaic or h. rhodensis-like, and the oldest ones can be easily classified as h. rhodensis). I'd say that humans were anatomically modern in the last 180,000 years, and with some archaic traits between that and 350,000 bc. Earlier than that before archaic h. sapiens we can talk about h. rhodensis (the h. heidelbergensis branch that would evolve in modern humans in Africa). Modern human and neanderthal branches of h. heidelbergensis split maybe around 600,000 years ago ar so.
The different colors represent the different human groups with the main purpose of easily showing the place of origin of each group of settlers. Skin color is not the only feature that distinguishes groups, it is just used because it refers more easily to each group.
Indo-Europeans: Light blue Africans: Dark gray Austronesians: Brown-gray SE Asians: Gold-brown East Asians: Gold Native Americans: Orange Great, but IMO you should’ve showed colors for mixed-ethnicity people (e.g. Mexico and Brazil as blue and orange dashed lines, Russia as blue and gold dashed lines, Madagascar as dark gray and medium gray dashed lines) and shown the Aleuts and Eskimos as gold instead of orange
I agree, this way it makes it look like all Mexicans are white and all Brazilians are black, when that's clearly not the case. And the problem is they're majority, because I would obviously not mind if he didn't show new immigrants to Europe for example, since they're minorities, at least until now. Thanks for the label
Ι think that light green represents uralic and altaic people, orange native american, medium green sino thibetic and paleosiberian, and dark green austronesian and malgasian.
Inaccurate video Humans lived in the Sahara Desert before its desertification, and humans did not enter Europe until shortly after the extinction of Neanderthals.
Most likely it's from the land bridge that connected Alaska to Far Eastern Russia. From what I know Humans did cross to Australia without from Indonesia without there being a land bridge so maybe some already had that technology (although they were still very close together)
@@Otterstone There were two land bridges, one that connected Malaysia to the western Indonesian islands, and one that connected Papua to northern Australia. However, to move from one side to the other required primitive seafaring technology, which was probably limited to rafts and stuff.
More than 20 thousand years ago the landmasses of Eurasia and America were still united, and what we know today as the Bering Strait was still a landmass covered in ice and snow, because indeed at that time was the ice age it was possible for humans to pass through it and arrive in Alaska, because the sea level at that time was lower than now.
We’re looking at ourselves here
🤣
i didn't consent to this dammit hrrr
That’s deep
Dank
@@gwynedd4023 I rename myself to Dankster only yesterday and I’m getting replies left and right talking about dank 😂
Imagine like you’re expanding whole world but forgetting to step on Madagscar.
@papa joe stalin of Stalinist stanistan to be more exact, they crossed the Indian ocean in canus leaving from borneo
papa joe stalin of Stalinist stanistan I think its because the khoi and san were mainly hunter gatherers. The bantu only arrived in 300 AD and together with some Cushitic people started a naval culture. Which became the Swahili Coast City States later on.
Madagascar was settled by Malay-Polynesians
I was gonna say that
New zealand
One criticism:
I'm not an expert, but I'm pretty sure there were lots of huge land bridges which aren't shown (such as between Britain and Europe) which enabled early humans to settle there.
On my main channel, I make videos with subtitles in 3 languages for old music of different nations. You are also invited. :)
th-cam.com/video/TwoZacagf7c/w-d-xo.html
Yeah, the video only shows the movement of humans on a modern map (and only one species of humans). It would be a whole other challenge to change the map too.
Heard they called it doggerland
Along with that the sahara wasnt a desert and was just as hospitable as the nile
It would require a lot more graphics. I was thinking the same, too.
Very Nice that you show the different ethnicities. One of the best mappers today on YT
Thank you
He didn't show ethnicities, he shows so-called "human races".
@@alexn.2901 bahh,"races" sounds so weird and bloated now,there must be an another way of calling others
@@wildschwein9066 Yes, the reality that race is a nonscientific arbitrary sociopolitical construct.
@@wildschwein9066 lmao so I'm religious AND communist?!? lmfaooo Why not just say I'm into Kulturbolschewismus :while we're at it?
Anyways, are you tracking every comment I make here? Why are you so obssessed w/ me?????
You even showed the different ethnicities... You are an amazing mapper
Thank you
It didn't show any ethnicities but arbitrary andnonscientific races.
@@alexn.2901 They are scientific they are backed up by phenotypes, physical characteristics, sometimes haplogroups and some others.
@@Euthenon The phenotypes are randomly chosen. Why is skin color (who can change) chosen but not blood type (who doesn't change) or eye color?
The criteria for each race are completely made up and conveniently only include the peoples European colonizers wanted to exploit for their free labour.
Also, we're literally all in the same haplogroup and no one uses that to determine race. Ever.
@@wildschwein9066 So you're saying white people are not truly humans. Interesting...
Anyways, there are Black people with natural blue eyes and who are born with blonde hair and there are plenty of white folks who don't have both. Besides, do you know what /pol/ is?
5:35 Oh look at this...It’s the first meetings between Native Americans and Europeans ! That’s sweat
*Ten seconds later...
O H B O Y
Not a bad thing in the long termn... And it is normal...
Pangea Play If you’re talking about making genocide is not a bad thing, I’m gonna end this conversation.
That's sweat?
IAmSeamonkey Encountering is sweat but making genocide, hell no.
@@AD-yq8rl Which genocide? Genocide is organized planned killing, in the Americas most natives were either killed by plagues (not willingly brought) or intermarried with Spaniards & mixed away. Some localized massacres happened, but there was never a genocide masterplan, historically speaking
It's interesting how Australia was first settled tens of thousands of years earlier than when the Americas were first settled, but New Zealand hadn't seen a human until less than a thousand years ago.
Iceland and Madagascar: *exist* humans: I do not see it
Yes, but they arrived late. You must watch the video to the end. In Iceland it is marked with light grey after 860 and Madagascar with grey/yellow after 200 BC
@papa joe stalin of Stalinist stanistan the Bob semple tank would like to know your location
@@CostasMelas I mean... I know... Of course they did arrive, why would Iceland exist as a country if they didn't
@@TwiggyBoy thats my old account which is now suspended. Had good memories in that account.
@@pinklasagna8328 rip
I read: "Spread of homosexuality"
@Comment Man I do
@Karl Berg yes im a homophobe
For human homosexuality the map is acurate.
@Karl Berg He isn't afraid, he hates them. As I do.
@@amortality999 ok but nobody asked
The color change of the Americas is terrifying 😳
@Carlo Canti that was considerably slower, I'd say
Carlo Canti Wiping out a whole race from it’s home does NOT sound reasonable.
Carlo Canti Well.Firstly, that’s not funny and I don’t see any pattern to fun with.
Secondly, your name is latin originated and you’re most probably from a Latin Country.I hope you do know that what’s happening in Mexican-American border and how Trump is behaving your people.
So then don’t cry if you get discrimanted.
Carlo Canti So good luck in the border !
Carlo Canti Arrogant ignorant.
The accuracy and amount of information in this channel is surprising. Keep it up, you are doing a great job, it will help a lot of people
Thank you
On my main channel, I make videos with subtitles in 3 languages for old music of different nations. You are also invited. :)
th-cam.com/video/TwoZacagf7c/w-d-xo.html
As with all your videos, the concept, the simple yet precise visuals and the amount of detail blew my mind. Really well done!
Thank you
On my main channel, I make videos with subtitles in 3 languages for old music of different nations. You are also invited. :)
th-cam.com/video/TwoZacagf7c/w-d-xo.html
I like how you included the colors of specific ancestral groups as well
What caused Northern Europe to become depopulated at 3:40?
EDIT: nvm it was ice age glaciers
The Last Ice age
desertification
Really cool, but you're missing so much by not showing how the land changed!
On my main channel, I make videos with subtitles in 3 languages for old music of different nations. You are also invited. :)
th-cam.com/video/TwoZacagf7c/w-d-xo.html
I love the fact that Madagascar New Zealand and Iceland weren't inhabited by humans even into historic times. That's amazing 😅
Another cool fact is Madagascar was reached by the Indonesians from all the way across the Indian ocean
The spread of Hominidae when? Neanderthals and other human species. Maybe even chimps. Also cool video!
The clock (top right) begins running at 300,000 years ago, and the map depicts the first spread out of Africa about 270,000. Most scientists date Homo sapiens sapiens [sic] (the modern version of us) about 200,000 years ago. Homo *sapiens* means that he did not attempt to map other hominin Homo species, and definitely not chimps (Pan troglodytes).
See also history of hominid populations at th-cam.com/video/pm-QKCmAY8E/w-d-xo.html
@@leornian4067 I think he was asking about if he would make a video showing the spread of other Homo species instead of just Homo Sapiens.
@@stupidmonkey1015 I think you're probably right. His English is vastly superior to my non-existent Ukrainian, but I didn't initially suspect he meant the future tense.
@@leornian4067 he is probably a she?
I noticed how there was a period from 1:01 - 1:51 where a population of human were separated from other human in the Eastern Mediterranean for a very long period of time but went extinct. Given such a long scale of time they must have evolved into a pretty different phenotype. Who are these people and I wonder how they looked like.
Let's spend more resources on colonizing space rather then fighting each other.
Because fighting eachother in space is a lot cooler than staying on the ground.
@@fredriks5090 😐
We won't stop fighting while there is such an uneven distribution of wealth and resources. Heck, very few countries can even afford to invest in space exploration to start with.
@@WarpDoomer 😐
@@ovilersmith5006 Space Criminals when figuring out that space crime is illegal:
*Understandable. Have a nice day."
What's with humans slowly leaving Libya and Egypt before one minute in? Also leaving Greece and the Levant was weird.
There are early findings that later disappear (for example cave Apidima), which strengthens the theory of the two waves
The Sahara desert didnt exist a hunderthousand years ago. There was only jungel and savanna there, so humans could live there. Then the climate changed and the land turned to desert, and with that humans also left.
@@MK-rw1on It's actually a cycle that happens every few thousands years. The Sahara would eventually be a tropical rainforest again in the few thousand years from now (but it might change as the climate change disrupts the cycle)
@@arvantsaraihan5777 climate change isn't real
@@arvantsaraihan5777 If that was true then you would see layers and layers of that in Sahara area which is not the way it is. The only evidence is that was not a desert at one point not that it desert then not desert in cycle. Landscape cannot be a in cycle as the volcanoes, continental plates shift, some new areas are created which there were not there before, like huge islands, mountains, etc and other disappear completely.
It is actually realy nice how we rule the world . We are maybe not the same but we are all humans after all.our ancestors is amazing and im proud of it.
Great vid can you do the languages of the ancient middle east next
Or perhaps on the Semitic languages
Celt of Canaan Esurix There’s two possible origins I believe for the family and they’re both really equally weighed. So it’s going to be a hard to choice.
Hey! At 2:55
You showed the sapiens migrating into the Eurasian steppes via Anatolia. But didn't the first sapiens that travelled out of Africa, went through the Arabian Coast, crossing the gulf, through the Persian coastline till the end of Indian coastline then reaching the Andaman islands, from there finally making it to the Malayan archipelago? As what I remember from what I have read, this migration happened before the steppes.
Oblige to share your thoughts if I miss something here. Cheers!
@brahmastra brahmastra quit it dude, you keep spewing nationalistic views that are only from the bias and perspective of your people. Not everything is about you
I agree with Kxnyshk. The first Sapiens peopled the torrid area and arrived in Australia before going north. The video has no scientific bases and is totally wrong in the depiction. The answer of Achilleuspetreas3828 is a typical fallacy in that not the argument is questioned, but the alleged nationalism of the argument's author: I don't know what nationalism has to do with this.
Do videos about the Iberian Reconquista and also the language families of Afroasiatic, Nilo Saharan, Mande, Niger, Congo, and Khoesan languages. That will compensate for the lack of videos about Africa.
From Ethiopia🇪🇹 to The WORLD
Indeed a wonderland 🎉🎉
Great video:) the colors are very accurate!! However wouldn't the first modern Homo sapiens leave Africa c. 70,000 years ago? After the taba eruption, through the strait of Yemen. All earlier attempts to leave Africa (before 70 Kya) failed.
I mean homo Sapiens reached Europe only around 40,000 years ago
It seems that he came to Europe in two waves. The first was very early and the only sample is currently finds in the cave Apidima in Greece. For the second wave we know it was before 40,000 but it is unknown when it started.
@@CostasMelas yes but the first one died off
They aren't accurate, because the most of Ugro-Finns are white (Estonians, Finnish, Erzya-mordwins, Karelian, Komi, Hungarians, etc.)
Would've been cool to see how the land changed at the same time. You can kind of infer where the land bridges were but actually having them on the map would've been better I think
On my main channel, I make videos with subtitles in 3 languages for old music of different nations. You are also invited. :)
th-cam.com/video/TwoZacagf7c/w-d-xo.html
You can see the change in the Americas after 1500
3:40
Her: My parents are not at home in Australia tonight.
Me:
This map is very interesting, specially when it shows the migrations between different human races
You're excellent. Subtle, with New Zealand, Polynesia, Djibouti's strait crossing. Even a great mapping of ethnicities' migrations.
It was heartbreaking for me to watch the orange, that's been there for so much time, almost vanish in a few seconds of video.
Thank you
I wonder how our ancestors lived 50 thousand years ago. Like we know they did not have civilization and were hunter gatherers but I wonder how it would be if a modern human spent 1 week with our prehistoric ancestors
Where did you get the data for the different races portrayed on the map? Seems a little unconvincing. Like how you have everyone in Sub-Saharan Africa (besides the Kalahari desert) are the same race and being identical to the people of Eastern India and Australia? You also have them identical to the East Africans and Horn Africans who are very diverse. You have the Nilotic peoples who are markedly darker and phenotypically different and the Horn African people who are much lighter on average. Even ignoring all of my other observations that still wouldn't make sense because the Bantu didn't expand into most of Africa until very recently in history. Prior to that, the majority of the continent was inhabited by Khoisan people, from the southern cape all the way up to the great lakes region. And Central Africa by pygmies.
Maybe if you have finished all the languages videos you can do the whole world languages (like the whole globe and all languages in your previous videos) though that would take a while just an idea though
Would have been interesting if the geology of the earth also changed over time.
Yeah, great video but would be even better with showing Bering land bridge, Sundaland, Doggerland, etc. Notes for significant events like green Sahara, glacial maximum, Mongol invasion, plagues, European colonialism, world wars, etc., would also be excellent.
On my main channel, I make videos with subtitles in 3 languages for old music of different nations. You are also invited. :)
th-cam.com/video/TwoZacagf7c/w-d-xo.html
i would like to point out some points that seem like mistakes, also one general big mistake, as it stands for modern humans, the earliet migration of humans from africa to eurasia that survived to today is the one that left from djibouti to yemen some 70K years ago, they did this 20K years before the migration through the sinai to the middle east.
at 2:41 you show the second and final entry to eurasia through sinai, that one however has occurred some 50K years ago, not 100K.
at 2:53 you show that the the arrival to central asia was through the pontic step when in fact it was through north eastern iran, not only that, you show that this migration happened some 85K years ago when it happened more like 40K years ago.
at 3:12 you show that humans arrived to north eastern china through the population that lived in north and central asia, that is in fact not correct, the population that went to china arrived through india, and that only happened around 45K years ago, not 70K years ago as you show
at 3:23 humans by now have already arrived in western australia and have crossed indonesia some 10K years earlier, in your map they are still stuck on the malay peninsula (which might i add was then connected to a much greater landmass since the sea levels were lower.)
also i'd like to ask exactly what those divisions towards the end are, are those ethnic groups? haplogroups? "races"? because the map you show does not fit any of these.
i'm not sure what definition you have for "human" (since in pre-history there were more than one human species) but this does not fit the known migration of homo sapiens
i appreciate the graphic and the effort put in however, taking such a monumental task is not for the faint of heart
Thank you for the remarks. Feedback is useful to improve of my work. All above points have an important uncertainty, because there are a lot alternative theories
OMG WHY IS THIS AWESOME VIDEO SO UNDERRATED?!??!?
On my main channel, I make videos with subtitles in 3 languages for old music of different nations. You are also invited. :)
th-cam.com/video/TwoZacagf7c/w-d-xo.html
It's crazy to think that humans were in Australia before Austria.
It was up to austronesions to discover the remaining untouched islands like hawaii, eater island, new zealand and madagascar.
Amazing to know that austronesian people (from Indonesia) who discovered Madagascar where it just sits basically next to africans.
Austronesians were really good at navigating the ocean, that's why they were the first to also discover most of the tiny Pacific Islands and inhabit them
Yes austronesians were very good seafarers and travellers...
Just wondering, how do you find this much detailed information? I also think of starting mapping but i have some problems with research.
Anyways, great video as always! Greetings from turkey 👋
Thank you
best of luck for mapping
@@CostasMelas : You didn't answer his question about sources.
Please do Semitic or some other Afro-Asiatic group next
Galileans were not Celtic
I will try to make them in the future
Pangea Play what does that have to do with anything, if you mean my name I wasn’t even thinking of that when I made it up, it’s supposed to reflect my dual heritage, and the fact that some late Roman client kings in judea had Galatian mercenaries just like the Ptolemies
And cushitic and semitic real afroasitic 😍😍😍
Anything on Africa?
Not often you see a video like this that goes 1000 years a second!
The video has no scientific basis. 'Homo sapiens' peopled first the torrid zone until Australia, not Anatolia and the steppes. You only have to read the Wikipedia article with a lot of scientific references. The artistic part is very nice, but you should get well-informed before doing such works based on scientific research, or at least give references.
So Ethiopia is pretty much the only place that we've been in continuously from the beginning.
The fact that australian aborigens coloniced Madagascar and not the africans is incredible😲
Austronesians, not Australians (the colors are slightly different, more black for Australians, Papua and Melanesians and more yellow for Austronesians)
Austronesian, asian
South eastern Africa was inhabited by hunter gatherers. It wasn’t until the bantu expansion and they reached southern/eastern Africa in 300 AD did they start a naval culture with other groups like the Cushitic people farther north.
Πάρα πολύ ωραίο έτσι όπως το χώρισες κατά φυλή!!!
whats your source on west-eurassians reaching upper east-asia before east-eurasians?
It is strange that I recently focused on pre-history and my favorite channels upload videos about pre-history and ancient history!
Great video! Is there anyway you could do one with homo sapians alongside other hominids such homo erectus and Neanderthals to give is a clearer idea as to how the colours changed.
Thank you
In the Ice Ages, also animate the rise and fall of sea level :: 2 critical areas in the spread of early Man are Beringia and Sundaland, which now are submerged. en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beringia/wiki/Sunda_Shelf
It's sad to see the disappearence of the native americans.
With the discovery of America, Europeans brought in some really nasty deseases (like pox, or typhus) and the natives had like zero immunity against those.
Tenochtitla was revaged, and so was the Inca Empire - before Pizzaro even discovered it, since the desease moved faster than the conquistadors themselves.
I find it wild that the Americas were being peopled at the same time as parts of Europe.
No they weren't ..Europe was inhabited much before.
complete bs to think there's a clean cut of the time some animal can started being called homo sapiens, there's a lot of gradient there
Amazing video, but I’m curious on why you showed the West and East eurasians diverging in the Caucasus and the South Asians migrating later through Arabia. Didn’t the south Asians split from east Eurasians?
Thank you. South Asians (Aboriginal, Papuan, Negrito etc) were the result of an earlier immigration wave
@@CostasMelas also I thought that west and east Eurasians split in Iran, but why are they shown in the Caucasus
I liked this video
Indeed, I didn't understand some gaps among populated areas (separating them, after also the "buffer" zones had been shown populated before) which are shown, somewhere, before historical ages.
Some of them appear due to glacial ages, but others are beyond my comprehension.
For instance: why the North African Atlas mountains (and all of Maghreb, I dare say) are shown populated, then not (for a long period)? And why that early gap between a populated South and South-Western Africa and East Africa?
It is related to climatic changes, mainly the alternations between the humid and arid seasons of the Sahara
@@CostasMelas Ah! I understand... Thank you for your reply, and my compliments for your excellent channel and for your beautiful videos and maps!
yoo he actually shows the european and moroccan skulls from 300k and 210k bc
Have you planned to make video about history of Caucasian languages ?
I would like to make it in the future
Niger Congo languages?
Imagine all those ancient people trying to understand the concept of 2000's A.C. People watching how they spread in just 6 minutes of video on our phones-
homo sapiens in europe on 200000 bc?then disappeared..where have you pick this info?
See about Apidima cave, Laconia
yeah probably some humans got swept out there from sea stayed there for a while then died out when neanderthals showed up
This map should’ve gotten real pale around 74,000. The fact that it didn’t makes me wonder how accurate this is
How do you reckon Homo sapiens started in northern Africa rather than the rift valley?
Jebel irhoud fossils date 300k years back
So basically we are all AFRICAN
Hello african brother
I don’t think it is appropriate to show the term “race” based on color since it is not widely accepted by anthropologists. Race is a biological concept and it is severely different than ethnicity. Humans are a race by its own, and there are no sub-races of humanity since there was no enough evolutionary time and communal seclusion of communities that allow the emergence of human sub-races, i think it would be better not to show color variations in your video.
Other than that, I appreciate that you showed the latest Sapiens discovery in Morocco.
There's more genetic variation between human races than there is between some scientifically recognized subspecies of wolves and bears.
Anthropologists can easily classify humans into distinct (and medically relevant) racial categories based on facial features, skeletal structure, hair texture, bone density, etc.
It was necessary to show the origin of the settlers in different parts of the world. The color easily and immediately reveals the place of origin of each group of settlers.
Dan Not here to start a discussion but as an anthropology student, I need to disagree with your comment. We cannot observe such variations due to, I hate to repeat, there is no enough evolutionary time and space for humans to become distinct sub-species. So whenever we find a burial site which has overlapping “racial” features of its native area, there are also others which do not overlap with the area. Carbon based analisis also do not support such claims as they do in dogs, for example.
We're not all the same so shove off with your marxist globalist propaganda.
Costas Melas I think showing the “race” makes that video different than the other “Homosapiens migration” videos so that’s cool I think.Good job Costas.
The common ancestor of Ethiopians, Somalis, Eritreans, Oromos, Amharas, Tigrayans, Copts and Berbers appeared in North Africa sixty thousand years ago.
Current berbers are in north africa since onl 2500 years
@@Skikdii the berbers are in north africa since from 10000 to 6000 . The arabs are news in the arabia island . Only 1000 BC
Great work! Also, what is the color code? It's not included in the video.
Thank you. The colors indicate the main human groups, in order to reveal the origin of each new wave of settlers
The colors I assume are Sub-Saharan, Eurasian, West Eurasian, East Eurasian, South Eurasian, Khoisan, ANE and Amerindian.
Bless our African mothers and fathers.
I bow to my ancestors 🎉🎉🎉
And my halfminded teacher tells me
Columbus discovered America
Native Americans: then we were living on Mars, before he discovered America
Same like vascoda gama discovered india
@@chandratejakokkonda6367 , newton discovered gravity, it is ultimate 🤣😂
@Default Profile Picture but native Americans knew there land.. and now we are calling the native Americans as mayans and navajo tribes
And the Alexander of Macedonia came to fought with india in nearly 330 BCE. It is the brits who came to know the world lately.. and they wanted to make there UK as highlight.. so that's why because of them these things we're studying wrong as in part of history and geography 😉
@Default Profile Picture ,that is in the European pont of view , and native Americans had somuch knowledge, they were not hunter gatherers, they had a good advanced civilization, for example mayans, inkans, Aztecs, navajos etc
@Default Profile Picture ,yes in the same way how Europeans didn't had a idea about America's
You have a good knowledge about natives, which country you are , I also researched so much about natives , mainly mayans and inkas , I got least information about aboriginals and tasmanians, I feel very sad for natives, they should get some of their land back
1:16: Balkans and middle East are uours yea!
1:53: oh fuck...
ok so I don't know how accurate this is but if humans truly arrived to south america 13k years ago all those native languages, quechua and amazon languages alike, absolutely have to be reconstructable to one language family and proto-language
Isolation creates larger language differences. Natives did not have alot of contact between groups and were seperated by geography so their languages diverged, versus in europe all of the Indo-european languages were constantly in contact and changed together
Πολύ ωραίο Κώστα.
Ευχαριστώ πολύ
Μπορείς να κάνεις κάποιο βίντεο που θα σχετίζεται με τους ινδοευρωπαιους. Δηλαδή πως ξεκίνησαν, από που προήλθαν, που μετανάστευσαν κλπ???
Πάντως, πολύ καλό βίντεο όπως πάντα, μπράβο.
Ευχαριστώ. Θα ήθελα να κάνω κάτι τέτοιο μελλοντικά
There are people living in Greenland?
Are the diffrent colors in this video represent diffrent subspecies of Homo Sapiens?
Did our species really originate 300 ky ago? I thought 100 ky to 200 ky was the most accurate estimate for anatomically modern humans, and 70 ky for behaviorally modern humans.
Well recently some human fossils have been found that were later identified as homo sapiens (300,000 years old), even though they also show obvious archaic traits. Tbh a specific 'start' of our species can't be exactly pinpointed, since h. sapiens evolved probably from african h. heidelbergensis (h. rhodensis) and that is a slow gradual process. Bassically older h. sapiens fossils look more and more archaic or h. rhodensis-like, and the oldest ones can be easily classified as h. rhodensis). I'd say that humans were anatomically modern in the last 180,000 years, and with some archaic traits between that and 350,000 bc. Earlier than that before archaic h. sapiens we can talk about h. rhodensis (the h. heidelbergensis branch that would evolve in modern humans in Africa). Modern human and neanderthal branches of h. heidelbergensis split maybe around 600,000 years ago ar so.
will the slight changes in continental drift be visible in this 280k time period?
Nope. However, changes in sea level will be, and I don't know why it wasn't included. Siberia and Alaska were connected due to lower sea levels.
The colors are based on skin?
The different colors represent the different human groups with the main purpose of easily showing the place of origin of each group of settlers. Skin color is not the only feature that distinguishes groups, it is just used because it refers more easily to each group.
@@CostasMelas Will you continue to post videos about languages? Some about a Bantu or a Sinitic language?
@@takerutakaishi4361 Yes, although I have not yet decided what to do next
Indo-Europeans: Light blue
Africans: Dark gray
Austronesians: Brown-gray
SE Asians: Gold-brown
East Asians: Gold
Native Americans: Orange
Great, but IMO you should’ve showed colors for mixed-ethnicity people (e.g. Mexico and Brazil as blue and orange dashed lines, Russia as blue and gold dashed lines, Madagascar as dark gray and medium gray dashed lines) and shown the Aleuts and Eskimos as gold instead of orange
+khoisans as dark orange
I agree, this way it makes it look like all Mexicans are white and all Brazilians are black, when that's clearly not the case. And the problem is they're majority, because I would obviously not mind if he didn't show new immigrants to Europe for example, since they're minorities, at least until now. Thanks for the label
Ι think that light green represents uralic and altaic people, orange native american, medium green sino thibetic and paleosiberian, and dark green austronesian and malgasian.
Yes, these are the groups in general. I used yellow, not green, but it may seems different in some screens.
People say you showed ethnicities, but I'd call them phenotypes
I think Homo sapiens reached Middle East, Central Asia and Indian subcontinent way before than Europe?
But why is there H Sapiens in Europe 50 000 BC? No Neanderthals?
For a period they coexisted in Europe
@@CostasMelas OK
hmmm, nicely done however I'm wondering if you can remove the great lakes since they didn't exist before ~12,000 years ago.
Inaccurate video Humans lived in the Sahara Desert before its desertification, and humans did not enter Europe until shortly after the extinction of Neanderthals.
Spread of Great Apes and Hominids Please!!! I would pay for this! lol Thank you for your videos. Crucial for my research.
Homo sapiens descended in Morocco And he was like his grandchildren in Morocco
i love how u include morroco and eastern africa supporting the two possible theories however u morocco is the oldest
When did you get the info though?
H-How did they get to the americas? Did they have boats?
Most likely it's from the land bridge that connected Alaska to Far Eastern Russia. From what I know Humans did cross to Australia without from Indonesia without there being a land bridge so maybe some already had that technology (although they were still very close together)
@@Otterstone There were two land bridges, one that connected Malaysia to the western Indonesian islands, and one that connected Papua to northern Australia. However, to move from one side to the other required primitive seafaring technology, which was probably limited to rafts and stuff.
More than 20 thousand years ago the landmasses of Eurasia and America were still united, and what we know today as the Bering Strait was still a landmass covered in ice and snow, because indeed at that time was the ice age it was possible for humans to pass through it and arrive in Alaska, because the sea level at that time was lower than now.
Remember once again before 10 thousand years ago the sea level was lower than now
Lower sea levels during the Pleistocene epoch created a land bridge between the far east and Siberia, which allowed humans to cross over.
ok they've inhabited the entire world, now time to watch them fight eachother
they happened long before we spread out humans have always been fighting wars
5:36 Did it ever occur once to Europeans that what they were doing to Native Americans was wrong?
This is really good! And you show ethnicities as well!
Great Work ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Thank you
Please do the Bantu expansion next!
230 thousand years ago the rest of humanity said - "we need to get out of this neighborhood"
This description is valid only on the basis of the findings at the present time.
Even 12,000BCE the date of epic Mahabharata can't be wrong. But archeologists claim around 4,700bce by carbon dating.
Very nice. I always thought that humans arrived in Oceania before Europe.
Thank you
Europe is not separated from Asia at all, so it was easier to migrate there
This might give humans a deeper perspective !