These Are the 3 Things Needed in EVERY Successful Strength Program
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 ต.ค. 2022
- To get Bullmastiff for FREE 🔽🔽🔽
empire-barbell.com/full-libra...
"BASE STRENGTH": 4.8 ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ from 170 Amazon Reviews!🔽🔽🔽
amzn.to/3d1pexd (also at www.empirebarbellstore.com)
Have big training goals and don't know the next move? Reach out to me for a consultation!
✅ DM me on Insta: @Bromarama
✅ or email: bromley@empire-barbell.com
⭐Full Workouts Uploaded DAILY on Patreon⭐
/ alexanderbromley
1. Squat plug
2. Progressively overloading with them
3. Liquid chalk for the grip issues.
Ayo don't leak the secrets !!!
just bought one(plug) max went up by 40 pounds
How far can one even progressive overload a plug. There's gotta be a ceiling?
@@secondthought2 You literally have to burst through plateaus in order to progress.
@@Chicken_m4n good looking out bro!
Much like intelligence, truly strong fuckers will shine no matter what. From Greg Knuckols: *Westside and Sheiko are diametrically opposed systems, but both have produced absurdly strong powerlifters*
Also Knuckols: *I ran a basic Westside Barbell template during those first few months back under the bar, since that’s what Travis introduced me to when I first started training, and it was what I was most comfortable with. That first year, I got my maxes back to around 450/365/550. After I had plateaued on the Westside template for a few months, I decided to give Sheiko a shot. The first month nearly buried me. However, after a four month run, my work capacity was through the roof (which I think is extremely important), and my maxes were around 545/400ish/605*
Lots of ways to get strong.
Got links to the programs
@@germaninvasion121 Got google?
@@geneharrogate6911 no I use bing
it's almost like the best programs are the one's that you are not doing, different stimuli than what you are used to can spur on renewed gains
But everyone knows that sheiko programs are simply the best. Low RPE, volume, high frequently at 80%-85%, emphasis on technique, specificity. This is how modern powerlifters are training.
It is a shame that EliteFTS is so criminally underwatched, poor social media managment really nerfs their reach.
Call this man the new bald Omni man
Unfortunately, the fact that they put out useful information is really what nerfs their reach.
I love Dave but when he injects his politics into their content (which is admittedly rare), it definitely turns me off their content. Great content when they stay on topic though
@@DanielSt444 Is he a nazi?
Elitefts is way to niche to reach a huge audience unless the youtube algorithm plays nice.
Lol started watching this on 2x speed then Dave on your end sped up almost sounded like a chipmunk
It’s nice to hear the differences in these types of programming broken down so well. The end goal is always the same and it’s wild to me how people seem to just pick a method of periodizing and become absolute ride or die fanboys. They’re all worth trying since you never know something doesn’t work for you until you’ve done it
Your reflection on the things said in the clip really improved my understanding of it! Thx
Hell yeah this video broke it down for me in a logical perspective. My opinion the most needed video that you put out Bromster. I now know how i should be programing my "periodizations" this made complete sense. Good stuff as always thank you
the 3 main channels I watch wrapped up in 1. I have already watched the Dr Mike interview, but great to hear again. like bracing videos it reinforces things
that thumbnail is an absolute win
The 'dumbest' training method is still absolutely crucial for a (good/progressing) novice. If you can get stronger by adding weight every workout, you have no business spinning your wheels in any other kind of program.
If you haven't already, have you considered making a rubric(like the ones for school projects) for strength programs and posting in the community section of youtube.
Just found this channel, good content! I am in my first year of training and digesting lots of content from EliteFTS and Mike Izraetel, glad I found this channel too.
This is good shit. Definitely subbing to this channel
I've rewatched that entire episode many times, good idea on covering it 👌
I just finished readin Dr. Mike's Scientific Principles of Strength Training. It is a great book, because it covers mostly the WHYs, instead of the HOWs of strength training. Some of the chapters were really eye opening, like the ones on fatigue management and SRA curves.
Are there any prerequisites to reading that book?
Should I read some other books before going to that one?
Mike himself says maybe the art and science of lifting from Omar isuf and Greg nuckols. Mike has a section at the beginning of his book that specifically calls that book out as a good pre req to get to know the terms and general concepts.
@@mianashhad9802 It's not a science book, it is a book for lifters who want to get strong and want to know as much as possible about this. It is something you probably will re-read from timew to time, at least some parts of it. In order to become a good lifter, even just a recreational one, you need good quality information, and Dr. Mike's books are just that. If you want to go deeper into the research papers and publications, you have the references at the end of each chapter. Brilliant book and AFAIK it's the only one of this nature.
@@bbszabi Thanks for the reply.
I was just asking this because the Scientific Principles of Hypertrophy Training does have a list of books to go through before reading it.
I thought that this book might have such a list as well.
@@mianashhad9802 There are no prerequsites to this book. It is well constructedd, logical and accessible. Of course it helps to have some lifting history and knowldge, so you know wehere to plug the information in and will be more familiar with the terminology.
A lot of parallels to my xc seasons. Base build over the summer with building up mileage and just a bunch of easy runs. Then more tempo (faster runs) and eventually speed work (400, 800, 1600 meter repeats). Finally, when we’re close to our most important race at the end of the season we pull back a lot of volume/mileage, add some pace work(a little faster than race pace), and that’s our peak.
I gotta give it up to you XC and long distance runners. The training is mind-numbingly boring. Definitely takes a mental fortitude above most other sports training
@@John_on_the_mountain Fanks
Pure gold!
Simple principles. Good video
Thanks for sharing.
Great video
I'd like to see a conversation between Wenning and Isratel, I think it'd be fascinating to see them hash it out like actual professionals
more like Mike Vs. Lyle
I was just thinking the same thing! I’m a big fan of wenning but we need to see him on a pod where he gets challenged. A deeper dive into specifics instead of the same broad themes/principles would be great.
@@oakcitystrong5605 the Juggernaut video with Matt where they talk Westside training was very good!
@@andrewmalek55 Agreed, and he opened up more about how far he got through traditional means before using conjugate which is an important caveat.
A large part of online criticism is based on what is seemingly "deliberate misunderstanding". RIP's SS is "starting" strength. GMAD was for a skinny skin and bones teen and it translates to EAT KID. Lou's you don't need quads for a squat did NOT mean if you were born without quads you can still squat, and LATS for the bench does NOT mean if you're pecs disappeared you can still bench maximal weights. Dave just matured into not arguing "conjugate" because it's just a waste of time.
You either understand concurrency,
OR you don't.
I’m a simple F
Three things?
Significant effort, adequate nutrition and rest.
Consistency is king
@@user-mg2dq4ty6c I would say by far the most important concept, at least with intermediate-advanced lifters.
I can understand your response in the context of people who are so zealous about only doing one set as if the only way.
But a couple things to consider with your counterargument and why going into bat for volume > intensity (at least that's how it came off because you didn't seem to properly explore the benefits of focusing on intensity):
1. You know that 80% of people seeking information on youtube are beginners/people just trying to get fit within reasonable timeframes around work/kids etc? So isn't messaging about how to get 50-60% of your gains in a shorter amount of time something that should be promoted? Instead of the "Do 20-40 working sets per muscle group per week" stuff that most people can't do/won't benefit as much from relatively?.
2: Even if people are progressing from beginner to intermediate and advanced, isn't it better that they start with quality over quantity and training with high intensity, keeping their technique good and strong. Then add volume as they need to get results? Too much fitness youtube messaging makes people feel like they necessarily have to do 3-5 sets per exercise and beginners all too often leave many reps in the tank (at 10-12 reps) just to get the volume measured by sets. Meaning they aren't upping the weight and maximally loading progressively. The research does show that even immediately trained people don't go as close to failure as they think (most have 4-5 reps left when they think they have only 1-2 left). And anecdotally, can you really say that most people in the gym really look like they're training intensely enough? A good bet as to why is that people get provided volume goals/targets and they focus on this as the primary driver for growth because that's what they're told by the fitness industry. Its a recipe for them not progressing despite a lot of time investment, so they quit.
Very nice breakdown and helped me better understand as im new to powerlifting with previous experience as a competitive bodybuilder. I just wonder my why all your videos breaking down anyone elses content, you always have to get in a few little condescending jabs. Its like you generally agree with most things but you dont want to seem too agreeable and have to ensure the viewer knows your the man! The powerlifting community seems to be a very petty bunch always looking to prove each other wrong
the bill nye of weightlifting
Mike wrote this article (written by Greg nuckols) ?
1:29
@@AlexanderBromley great! Cheers, i really like nuckols anyway, but wasn't sure there was an extra article by Mike I'd missed, appreciated
😊
I think the article you found is written by Greg Knuckles, not Mike. So I think you pulled uDifferent article than Mike was talking about
Theres a caption in the vid saying Greg wrote part I, Mike wrote part II. Same title and point to both articles.
@@AlexanderBromley Fair enough!
Thank you for your knowledge and videos USA 🇺🇸 USA 🇺🇸 USA 🇺🇸
!!!
This guy is a little green behind the ears... Use some spill suppression on that shiny head :)
The only 3 things you need are curls, exogenous testosterone, and curls.
Got a perm and ordered some drugs
Dave Tate is one smart guy no wonder he brought up a equally smart guy like Andrew Tate
WTF going on with the speed up voices??
It’s the voices in your head bro 👻
Darude - Sandstorm
It's called shortening the original source so you don't have to basically sit through 2 videos in one.
It’s appreciated but gave me a little anxiety too 😅
Lol have you got the 2 minute version or sumthing