if the average person acted in a few or even just one of their traits such as useless, ignorant, out of touch, unprepared / lies, lack of production with mind boggling cost. all would be fired and it would be closed within days. agreed ulevo canada is just as bad as feminists have control law system for decades
Why are we paying huge salaries for these people when they don't know the very basics of their own field of expertise? I would be out of a job if I turned up to an important meeting and could answer even the most basic questions about my own field of study. I bet they get paid more than me. It wasn't that they didn't have the exact figures. They had absolutely no idea.
We'd all be alarmed to find out just how many public servants Australia employs who get paid much more than the politicians AND we can't vote them out of office!! The public servants in this video are probably 'acting' in someone elses position and receiving higher duties pay as are a disturbing number of senior PSs at any given time in our federal, state and local government departments!
We'll take that on notice,totally clueless people who are wasting billions of dollars for an agenda they have no quantifiable information on,virtue signalling and a carbon tax won't make a lick of difference to the climate,totally corrupted!@#
@@mikkelhoejen it's clearly stated in most of these videos through questions, what numbers they got and not got though. It is a case of those before the Senator not having done their home-work for this debate. Kind of like the Gender pay-gab video where he asked basic questions: Have you check this and that? Or is it just based on this?
Incredible that they don't even have even the most basic top line data on emissions for this hearing. As Leyonhjelm says, "a quick Wikipedia revealed that....etc etc." Point made.
Haha, what a pointless agreement. And everybody was so outraged that the US pulled out. The agreement seems to make no difference whether anybody signs up or not.
Ryan Jolly the earth was here billions of years before us and will remain here billions of years after us!!! Ozone layer had a hole and now it doesn’t the earth looks after itself just fine giving me another tax won’t fix anything!!!
Here's a thought. If you think the planet is doomed, that sounds super important. Why not familiarize yourself with the data and then look at the "science" with a critical eye to see if maybe things aren't quite as bad as suggested by green groups. Maybe you could look at the long term tide gage data its self and you'd go "Gee, global warming only became a real issue in the 1980s yet sea level rise has been at the same rate IN THE DATA for over 100 years, yet these people are telling me the data says its accelerating." A few things like that and you really start to dig in and notice all kinds of disconnects between what the data v/s scientists say or what the IPCC says v/s what you hear in media or from green groups...and that's when you start having people call you all kinds of names and suggest you're evil because you answer false claims with the official data from the official sources.
@@cabudagavin3896 there's nothing we can do that wouldn't cost millions of lives. if man made pollution would indeed contribute further to climate change (which it doesn't as there's no proof of that) then it would still be nothing we could do, we're too small to have any meaningful effect on the planet's climate
Every video I watch with this man, the response is, " we don't have those figures at the moment" , "we will get those figures and will get back to you"
It's amazing that these people come so unprepared for these sessions. Can you provide a follow up post of the next session on this topic when they close all the questions you posed that they couldn't answer the first time?
Given that the default assumption by those types is that climate science is undeniable, the questions would be more like "What is Australia doing to reduce emissions now?" "What more can Australia do to reduce emissions?" "How can we stop mounting pressure to use Nuclear power?" "On a scale of Gold to Platinum, how good can Australians feel morally?"
Well they are academics. They never really had anyone put them on the spot like this. They are just used to FAILING STUDENTS if they ask them these kind of pride hurtful questions. They just wanted people to ACT. That's it. That is because they think they are smarter than everyone else.
HOW ON EARTH ARE THESE PEOPLE SO UNPREPARED!?! If i was told to do a job, and i came this unprepared, and just said to my boss "i'll take it on notice" Yeah, I'm fired. These people need to get fired, and removed. FFS!
What I like about this Senator is that he asks the basic questions that people pushing their own agenda (and not just on this topic) SHOULD know the answers to, but somehow do not. It is like they only know how to look at their pet project through one perspective. Probably comes because they only discuss it with like minded people. Another of the dangers of societies and universities self censoring what can and cannot be discussed.
As David has said before, "our government is addicted to spending other peoples money". The Australian gov is addicted to 'wasting' tax payer money. This has got to change!
To be honest, that is pretty much every government. In Norway we have just as disgusting and incompetent people as well. Usually women who promote politics which are based on feelings, without any proper rationale or thought of the longevity and consequences of their policies / spending. As long as they feel good "here and now", that is all that matters to them. We quite literally gave 1 billion to Brazil to make them stop cutting down their rain forest. In the years we did that, them cutting down the rain forest ESCALATED! So stupid.
@@odinsplaygrounds Agreed, it is becoming more and more obvious that the left, right and everything in between are merely representations of governance in its many forms, and all with their own agendas that require a slave workforce, even if it is slavery under the veil of democracy.
Please supply things like name of department being questioned, purpose of meeting etc in video header so we can easily use this valuable resource.. Great work. Thanks
If there are no direct answers to the questions being asked, why is global warming and global emissions an issue? If this was as important as they make out, the answers would be on the tip of their tongue.
He is clearly asking questions he already has the answers to just to showcase the ineptitude of most department heads. Former Senator David Leyonjelm is truly a gentleman amongst unqualified and corrupt politicians. He is sadly missed.
Guy "Do you have the figures broken down by country?" Lady "we don't have that information today" Judge Judy "Where do you think you were coming to today?"
I thought the United States was the leader in Peter Principle bureaucrats. These videos demonstrate Australia is giving us a run for our (wasted) money.
Is there a follow-up meeting for the questions on notice? As for the whole "climate change", the current election is always saying they will do such and such to reduce our footprint. My question is why are these video's not put out on Australian media?
😂 “ we had no idea you were gonna ask is these questions about greenhouse gas emissions at this discussion of greenhouse gas emissions, but we are prepared to discuss every aspect of the lives of the Kardashians “ 😂
Yes,a complete farce,as is saying the great barrier reef is dying,a complete lie,but the media and the ABC left organisations are so happy to go along with it because they are part of the agenda!
It's not uncommon for senior executives to attend a meeting because they want face time yet be completely unprepared for the questions. I've spent many a meeting sitting behind my boss so he could turn and look at me whenever a question was asked and I'd feed him the answer. Best example I know was our executive was testifying before Congress (US) and spent a week preparing on the wrong things. And we told him those were the wrong things for that hearing but he wanted a lot of "ghee whiz" (his words) to impress them with. Made a complete ass of himself when they asked him about all the things we tried to prepare him for but he didn't listen.
Rhetorical Question: Do emissions corelate to population? If yes, then when we allow immigration to the tune of 1% of our population per year, then we should expect emmisions to increase accordingly. And no matter how diligent our population is wrt personal footprint, it is all for not. In 50 years, even without personal increases, our emissions will increasr by 50%. Give or take.
Bruce @ Enterprise Risk Services That shouldn’t be a rhetorical question, because the answer is not obvious at all. Firstly, how do the emissions of a typical immigrant compare to that of a typical native? I would assume there’s a significant difference, but it would vary by country and time. Secondly, does it actually scale like that? If I had the same country with double the people, assuming those people act the same, would it be logical to have double the emissions? I suspect not, because the population density would be different, the housing in cities would probably differ etc. Thirdly, if you can get it so that an average person is carbon neutral, then it doesn’t matter how many people you have. Wouldn’t that be a better solution?
@@fenhen You're using good arguments against stupid rethorical questionning. I don't expect you'll get an intelligent answer. Watching this video it's appalling how unprepared these people were, but i think where this senator wanted to lead them with this question was also quite bad. With his questions he clearly wanted to have them say "even if we do reduce to 0 our emissions, global emissions would still be on the rise". I find it a bit disingenuous because the true important number is emission per habitant, in wich case Australia is certainly a very bad example. It's a bit funny to see him do that when in another video talking about wage gap in nails the fact that when comparing different things you need to use the right unit. He is definetely an intelligent senator, but i wonder if sometimes he doesn't use this intelligence for self-serving goals.
@@ix-Xafraimmigration does not create growth, it creates the appearance of a bigger economy from the perspective of some one from the outside looking in but means that what you have is spread out amongst more people ie the standard of living falls which is pretty much what has happened in all countries using Blair economics.
massive waste of millions of dollars in wages right here . do these public servants actually know anything at all besides deflecting answers and raising our taxes .
FFS I know this was recorded back in 2017 but I can answer most of his questions by a google search in seconds. And the questions he is asking are pretty simple (I'm only 3:24 into the clip) you would think anyone working for a senate environment committee would have these numbers at there finger tips(I would ). This is a disgrace!
Given the less than adequate performance of most Public Servants at Senate hearings, you need not be surprised. At least these PS's didn't sneer at Senator Leyonhjelm the way the token "experts" from the Office for Women did when their utter incompetence and incomprehension were exposed.
I would expect the senator to ask the witnesses to go away until they are fully able to review and discuss (with information) - as they appear woefully unprepared! These questions are not of the minute detail (the effect of changing from one PV technology to another!) but are generic questions about how Australia compares to others and the future plans🤨
Luckily, if public 'servants' don't do their job they won't get the arse for being incompetent parasites. They can go on to a stellar career of being ineffectual nobodies and retire with a package that would be the envy of anyone who spent their working life actually doing something worthwhile and not being recognised for it.
The Paris Agreement was not a pointless agreement. It was a document that served the nations of the world to set low ball goals that they were not planning on meeting but that would look good for the population that is worried about the next generations’ state of the planet. This was a very sad turn of events when nations signed it because it was not meant to actually do anything, not even slow down the inertia but lower the contributions to the ever increasing global environmental inertia. The most interesting part of this whole debacle is how bad the situation actually is and how it is something like Nuclear Energy that is the cleanest form of efficient energy currently available, as the emissions are captured in the earth and not dispersed in the atmosphere. Solar energy costs a lot to produce and the cells last only twenty five years. Wind is not a viable answer for a large grid. And hydro is still not as good as nuclear as it’s dependent on climate, expensive to build, destructive to fish populations, and competes with the use of water with the environment, human and animal communities
It is always a good idea to know what you’re talking about before you face a committee if you don’t want to look foolish, especially with this guy asking questions.
These figures should be well known to a civil servant working in this field. Are they not interested in their jobs? Are they disinterested and incompetent? Most certainly, embarrassing for Australia.
If instead of taking the answers to these questions "on notice" they should have said that they'd "circle back" and then they'd be well qualified to be a liberal US press secretary.
Ha! The question everyone avoids! It's not easy fleecing developing countries for money. It's much easier to fleece the West, where most people and companies are environmentally conscious, and as a result have taken a lot of measures to reduce emissions. Fact is, the more developed and free a country is, the cleaner it gets. But it goes further than this. These people don't care about the environment. If they did, they would care about all the forests and meadows that would have to be leveled to make room for solar farms. They'd care about all the birds killed by wind turbines. They would also care about the fact that, despite Germany's high investment rate in renewable energy, their emissions haven't budged. They would also care that the biggest drop in emissions was experienced by France when they moved over to nuclear power. If we want clean energy, environmentally friendly, financially viable, available, feasible, we have to return to nuclear power. Solar and wind are expensive, inefficient, harmful for the environment, and overall not feasible. People trying to push for renewable energy only want to make money.
We didn't bring any data because we didn't think we would have to answer questions relevant to even the basic aspects of our jobs. Now can we have our paychecks? We have to get to a meeting where we discuss things completely irrelevant to climate change.
what difference would it make if Australia reduced its carbon footprint significatly or even to 0? what impact would that have on the climate? im tipping so close to 0 you would not be able to tell?
This all seems like info that they should know off hand, even if not specific numbers, they should know the trends if this is their area of “expertise”
6 people and one of them can't get on a phone to get the senators answers. We would be better off employing work for the dole ppl. They would probably do a better job.
funniest thing is when he starts asking questions he already has the answers on the page infront of him.... he just wants to find the bullshiters sucks hes not heading the party anymore... we need more people like him in our so call "liberal" party here in Canada...
From watching so many of these there seems to be a direct correlation between the length of a woman's hair and her level of intelligence/preparedness. .
Why don't you just mention their avowed identity of an "unprepared bureaucrat"? Why mention their ascribed identity of ladyness? Claiming that someone's ascribed identity affects their performance is unlikely to help your case. Wait are you at least an equal opportunity offender and not just somebody targeting someone for arbitrary reasons? Or do you say want you think is effective when you see someone as incompetent (ya know you don't actually believe it but you reckon it would bother such psychographic)?
David, are you the only prepared adult in the Government at the moment?
I'd be embarrassed to turn up to a meeting this unprepared.
He's not in the government unfortunately. He's an independent senator. It's a shame we don't have more like him.
@UIevo your government is terrible now
their paper pushers, they know nothing about the topic
if the average person acted in a few or even just one of their traits such as useless, ignorant, out of touch, unprepared / lies, lack of production with mind boggling cost. all would be fired and it would be closed within days.
agreed ulevo canada is just as bad as feminists have control law system for decades
have you seen office space? the TPS reports and 'my secretary does that for me'... "so what do you actually do on any given day?". LOL
Why are we paying huge salaries for these people when they don't know the very basics of their own field of expertise? I would be out of a job if I turned up to an important meeting and could answer even the most basic questions about my own field of study. I bet they get paid more than me. It wasn't that they didn't have the exact figures. They had absolutely no idea.
We'd all be alarmed to find out just how many public servants Australia employs who get paid much more than the politicians AND we can't vote them out of office!!
The public servants in this video are probably 'acting' in someone elses position and receiving higher duties pay as are a disturbing number of senior PSs at any given time in our federal, state and local government departments!
They came prepared, allright, but only with the data that fulfills their confirmation bias.
I agree, it's nothing but a great Fraud on the Australian People.
@@mikkelhoejen nice copy and paste no one cares
@@mikkelhoejen no. they should go there expecting to be asked about everything, including opposing views to theirs.
I'm not Australian, but dear Aussies, do not let this man retire for your sake
Already retired :(
Unless there is someone as good as him, Australia is up shit creek.
There are some very good senators, but too many bought and paid for selfish politicians doing other self interested parties bidding.
We'll take that on notice,totally clueless people who are wasting billions of dollars for an agenda they have no quantifiable information on,virtue signalling and a carbon tax won't make a lick of difference to the climate,totally corrupted!@#
Australia emits 1.3%. There are about 170 countries that emit the same amount - a total of 40%. She actually said that.
Exactly my thought!
HAHA I''m glad other people caught that too
I didn't know math is different in Australia. Good to know (From the US)
So why didn't she answer it again ,because she lost paper it was written on,she should know those numbers instantly, its meant to her job
Similar size, not same size. 1.3% is such a small percentage, probably hard to get any real idea from it
Unbelievable!
How can 5/6 very well-paid adults turn up at a hearing without ANY preparation?
Shameful.
Because climate change. You're a denier if you want to question it
My boss would've kicked me out of his office!!!
because they are oublic sector and mainly women!
Why doesn’t he ask “what questions DID you come prepared to answer?”
"White previledge contributes 40% of the emission senator" 🤣
If you don't know anything about your job why do you have a job? Affirmative action?
Karma King yes
How do I get a job knowing nothing and get $ 100k + per year ......?
They're women duh they're entitled
@@mikkelhoejen it's clearly stated in most of these videos through questions, what numbers they got and not got though.
It is a case of those before the Senator not having done their home-work for this debate.
Kind of like the Gender pay-gab video where he asked basic questions: Have you check this and that? Or is it just based on this?
@@mikkelhoejen I have read this a few times, copy and paste. Learn to think and not regurgitate cow dung.
Incredible that they don't even have even the most basic top line data on emissions for this hearing. As Leyonhjelm says, "a quick Wikipedia revealed that....etc etc." Point made.
How much unnecessary CO2 is being emmitted by these public servants? Compost the lot and grow geraniums . My mum likes geraniums
That's it . . . . I'm going for a $100,000+ job in the Govt first thing tomorrow morning !
why start at the bottom? lol
Every women has to take every question on notice, WOW. Super competent. 🤣
Chance Waak I've seen a few of these vids and it's laughable how many simple questions they have to take on notice
@@mikkelhoejen how many threads are you going to paste this nonsense that makes you look like a moron?
You try doing her job moron
You will never get a quick answer
Conor Mitchell ,,,, incompetence defined. 😂🤣😂🤣😭🤣😂😭😭
Haha, what a pointless agreement. And everybody was so outraged that the US pulled out. The agreement seems to make no difference whether anybody signs up or not.
so we are doomed and should do nothing to attempt to save ourselves? great.
Ryan Jolly the earth was here billions of years before us and will remain here billions of years after us!!! Ozone layer had a hole and now it doesn’t the earth looks after itself just fine giving me another tax won’t fix anything!!!
@@youarethegreatest2150 ozone doesn't have a hole because of an agreement by many countries. Didn't you know that?
Here's a thought. If you think the planet is doomed, that sounds super important. Why not familiarize yourself with the data and then look at the "science" with a critical eye to see if maybe things aren't quite as bad as suggested by green groups. Maybe you could look at the long term tide gage data its self and you'd go "Gee, global warming only became a real issue in the 1980s yet sea level rise has been at the same rate IN THE DATA for over 100 years, yet these people are telling me the data says its accelerating."
A few things like that and you really start to dig in and notice all kinds of disconnects between what the data v/s scientists say or what the IPCC says v/s what you hear in media or from green groups...and that's when you start having people call you all kinds of names and suggest you're evil because you answer false claims with the official data from the official sources.
@@cabudagavin3896 there's nothing we can do that wouldn't cost millions of lives. if man made pollution would indeed contribute further to climate change (which it doesn't as there's no proof of that) then it would still be nothing we could do, we're too small to have any meaningful effect on the planet's climate
Every video I watch with this man, the response is, " we don't have those figures at the moment" , "we will get those figures and will get back to you"
Every single one of these videos I watch are just people saying "I dunno" over and over.
It's amazing that these people come so unprepared for these sessions. Can you provide a follow up post of the next session on this topic when they close all the questions you posed that they couldn't answer the first time?
What on earth were they expecting to be asked I wonder?
Given that the default assumption by those types is that climate science is undeniable, the questions would be more like
"What is Australia doing to reduce emissions now?"
"What more can Australia do to reduce emissions?"
"How can we stop mounting pressure to use Nuclear power?"
"On a scale of Gold to Platinum, how good can Australians feel morally?"
It's common to send idiots to hearings because it's better to say "I don't know" instead of having to give a factual answer you don't want to give.
Well they are academics. They never really had anyone put them on the spot like this. They are just used to FAILING STUDENTS if they ask them these kind of pride hurtful questions.
They just wanted people to ACT. That's it. That is because they think they are smarter than everyone else.
We could use a man like Sen Leyonhjelm here in Canada.
HOW ON EARTH ARE THESE PEOPLE SO UNPREPARED!?!
If i was told to do a job, and i came this unprepared, and just said to my boss "i'll take it on notice"
Yeah, I'm fired.
These people need to get fired, and removed. FFS!
lol, not only fired, lucky if he doesn't kick your arse too.
What I like about this Senator is that he asks the basic questions that people pushing their own agenda (and not just on this topic) SHOULD know the answers to, but somehow do not.
It is like they only know how to look at their pet project through one perspective.
Probably comes because they only discuss it with like minded people.
Another of the dangers of societies and universities self censoring what can and cannot be discussed.
That's what happen when you give jobs according to "gender equality" rather than skills and knowledge
The Public "Service" (Circus) in action . . .
As David has said before, "our government is addicted to spending other peoples money".
The Australian gov is addicted to 'wasting' tax payer money.
This has got to change!
To be honest, that is pretty much every government. In Norway we have just as disgusting and incompetent people as well. Usually women who promote politics which are based on feelings, without any proper rationale or thought of the longevity and consequences of their policies / spending. As long as they feel good "here and now", that is all that matters to them. We quite literally gave 1 billion to Brazil to make them stop cutting down their rain forest. In the years we did that, them cutting down the rain forest ESCALATED! So stupid.
@@odinsplaygrounds Agreed, it is becoming more and more obvious that the left, right and everything in between are merely representations of governance in its many forms, and all with their own agendas that require a slave workforce, even if it is slavery under the veil of democracy.
This is gold. Who needs a comedy show!
Every time someone says "I'm happy to take this on notice" what they really say is "...I have no clue and I got caught"
"Let's ignore the fact I can't even answer a basic question and move on"
Nah they know. It’s a way of not letting you try and trap them with questions.
If I were in Australia I'd put that whole panel on Notice... I wouldn't even let them work it!
Please supply things like name of department being questioned, purpose of meeting etc
in video header so we can easily use this valuable resource.. Great work. Thanks
So did they bring anything to the meeting at all, aside from their colouring books and crayons?
googled all the answers while watching this, what did they actually prepare for
It's been a common theme lately with politicians that can't answer questions or they simply can't recall
It's hard to have a battle of witts with an unarmed person !
170 countries produce around 1.3%, that is now over 200% of emissions by small emitters. And no answer about the Largest Emitters.
Glad to see someone else noticed the maths. Bet they wouldn't give you a job that these pampered twats currently hold.
No no. Watch it again. 170 countries of a similar size to Australia produce 40% of the global total.
Australia produces 1.3% of the global total.
200% of emissions? wow someone didnt take school seriously did they?
DON'T BLAME CHlNA!!!!!!!
If there are no direct answers to the questions being asked, why is global warming and global emissions an issue? If this was as important as they make out, the answers would be on the tip of their tongue.
Why did they show up?
In other words they came with no intentions to tell us anything
Public Servants are focussed on process, not outcome. If they actually arrive at an outcome, they simply dont know what to do with it.
Was that from “Yes Minister”😀
He is clearly asking questions he already has the answers to just to showcase the ineptitude of most department heads.
Former Senator David Leyonjelm is truly a gentleman amongst unqualified and corrupt politicians.
He is sadly missed.
The inept, working for our best interests.
It would take about ten seconds to call that up on a phone.
I miss this man, he was brilliant at destroying these imposters.
So I guess we can just replace them with wikipedia
Guy "Do you have the figures broken down by country?"
Lady "we don't have that information today"
Judge Judy "Where do you think you were coming to today?"
Kid's cant show up to school this unprepared... Without getting into trouble, or being held back.
I thought the United States was the leader in Peter Principle bureaucrats. These videos demonstrate Australia is giving us a run for our (wasted) money.
Is there a follow-up meeting for the questions on notice?
As for the whole "climate change", the current election is always saying they will do such and such to reduce our footprint. My question is why are these video's not put out on Australian media?
If i showed up this unprepared to a meeting i would be fired.
😂 “ we had no idea you were gonna ask is these questions about
greenhouse gas emissions at this discussion of
greenhouse gas emissions, but we are prepared to discuss every
aspect of the lives of the Kardashians “ 😂
Hw do these people have these jbs? They are clueless.....
I dont get it
Lack of accountability. Quota hires.
wow and we gave those things the right to vote at some point,
Dole recipients come better prepared.
A more suitable answer is that 69% of emissions are not regulated under the Paris agreement.
Yes,a complete farce,as is saying the great barrier reef is dying,a complete lie,but the media and the ABC left organisations are so happy to go along with it because they are part of the agenda!
It's not uncommon for senior executives to attend a meeting because they want face time yet be completely unprepared for the questions. I've spent many a meeting sitting behind my boss so he could turn and look at me whenever a question was asked and I'd feed him the answer. Best example I know was our executive was testifying before Congress (US) and spent a week preparing on the wrong things. And we told him those were the wrong things for that hearing but he wanted a lot of "ghee whiz" (his words) to impress them with. Made a complete ass of himself when they asked him about all the things we tried to prepare him for but he didn't listen.
Rhetorical Question: Do emissions corelate to population?
If yes, then when we allow immigration to the tune of 1% of our population per year, then we should expect emmisions to increase accordingly. And no matter how diligent our population is wrt personal footprint, it is all for not. In 50 years, even without personal increases, our emissions will increasr by 50%. Give or take.
We all have to breath in a shallower manner to reduce our personal emissions and allow greater immigration for the sake of economic growth...
@@ix-Xafra So, the priority ranking is?
1) the economy
2) immigration
3) carbon emmissions
Bruce @ Enterprise Risk Services That shouldn’t be a rhetorical question, because the answer is not obvious at all.
Firstly, how do the emissions of a typical immigrant compare to that of a typical native? I would assume there’s a significant difference, but it would vary by country and time.
Secondly, does it actually scale like that? If I had the same country with double the people, assuming those people act the same, would it be logical to have double the emissions? I suspect not, because the population density would be different, the housing in cities would probably differ etc.
Thirdly, if you can get it so that an average person is carbon neutral, then it doesn’t matter how many people you have. Wouldn’t that be a better solution?
@@fenhen You're using good arguments against stupid rethorical questionning. I don't expect you'll get an intelligent answer.
Watching this video it's appalling how unprepared these people were, but i think where this senator wanted to lead them with this question was also quite bad.
With his questions he clearly wanted to have them say "even if we do reduce to 0 our emissions, global emissions would still be on the rise".
I find it a bit disingenuous because the true important number is emission per habitant, in wich case Australia is certainly a very bad example.
It's a bit funny to see him do that when in another video talking about wage gap in nails the fact that when comparing different things you need to use the right unit.
He is definetely an intelligent senator, but i wonder if sometimes he doesn't use this intelligence for self-serving goals.
@@ix-Xafraimmigration does not create growth, it creates the appearance of a bigger economy from the perspective of some one from the outside looking in but means that what you have is spread out amongst more people ie the standard of living falls which is pretty much what has happened in all countries using Blair economics.
This is why nothing gets done in Australia.
"I was told there wasn't going to be a test today!"
excellent, and, i know from experience, lol
No one can answer a simple question, happens all the time Leyonhjelms videos.
massive waste of millions of dollars in wages right here . do these public servants actually know anything at all besides deflecting answers and raising our taxes .
Gotta love his deadpan question delivery. Do they know anything about the field they work in?
Can't wait to live in a dystopian world.
FFS I know this was recorded back in 2017 but I can answer most of his questions by a google search in seconds. And the questions he is asking are pretty simple (I'm only 3:24 into the clip) you would think anyone working for a senate environment committee would have these numbers at there finger tips(I would ). This is a disgrace!
Given the less than adequate performance of most Public Servants at Senate hearings, you need not be surprised. At least these PS's didn't sneer at Senator Leyonhjelm the way the token "experts" from the Office for Women did when their utter incompetence and incomprehension were exposed.
I would expect the senator to ask the witnesses to go away until they are fully able to review and discuss (with information) - as they appear woefully unprepared! These questions are not of the minute detail (the effect of changing from one PV technology to another!) but are generic questions about how Australia compares to others and the future plans🤨
Luckily, if public 'servants' don't do their job they won't get the arse for being incompetent parasites. They can go on to a stellar career of being ineffectual nobodies and retire with a package that would be the envy of anyone who spent their working life actually doing something worthwhile and not being recognised for it.
The Paris Agreement was not a pointless agreement. It was a document that served the nations of the world to set low ball goals that they were not planning on meeting but that would look good for the population that is worried about the next generations’ state of the planet. This was a very sad turn of events when nations signed it because it was not meant to actually do anything, not even slow down the inertia but lower the contributions to the ever increasing global environmental inertia.
The most interesting part of this whole debacle is how bad the situation actually is and how it is something like Nuclear Energy that is the cleanest form of efficient energy currently available, as the emissions are captured in the earth and not dispersed in the atmosphere.
Solar energy costs a lot to produce and the cells last only twenty five years. Wind is not a viable answer for a large grid. And hydro is still not as good as nuclear as it’s dependent on climate, expensive to build, destructive to fish populations, and competes with the use of water with the environment, human and animal communities
The worst thing is that they are getting paid.
The worst thing is that they have an agenda that is contrary to the interests of their own country.
What information did these people bring to the table?
We dont have data on the USA but the paris agreement is 85% and 72% without the USA.
So the USA is 13% then.
Ffs
Haha I thought the exact same!!! Ineptitude at its best eh??
I wish this guy would be able to run for President of the USA!
Can anyone find the actual senate reports relating to this hearing, i cant find anything
Rule of the game. Dont hold statistics that undermine your agenda
It is always a good idea to know what you’re talking about before you face a committee if you don’t want to look foolish, especially with this guy asking questions.
Dear god Australia what the hell are you paying these people for? 🙄
Yeah,go woke go broke,maybe I am a mysogonist pig but there seem to be a lot of women on all these chat shows saying how unrepresented they are!
why there are even coming to the meeting .
These figures should be well known to a civil servant working in this field. Are they not interested in their jobs? Are they disinterested and incompetent? Most certainly, embarrassing for Australia.
So an entire gov department could be replaced by 1 person using google. How much money is being wasted on this department?
If instead of taking the answers to these questions "on notice" they should have said that they'd "circle back" and then they'd be well qualified to be a liberal US press secretary.
Ha! The question everyone avoids! It's not easy fleecing developing countries for money. It's much easier to fleece the West, where most people and companies are environmentally conscious, and as a result have taken a lot of measures to reduce emissions. Fact is, the more developed and free a country is, the cleaner it gets. But it goes further than this. These people don't care about the environment. If they did, they would care about all the forests and meadows that would have to be leveled to make room for solar farms. They'd care about all the birds killed by wind turbines. They would also care about the fact that, despite Germany's high investment rate in renewable energy, their emissions haven't budged. They would also care that the biggest drop in emissions was experienced by France when they moved over to nuclear power.
If we want clean energy, environmentally friendly, financially viable, available, feasible, we have to return to nuclear power. Solar and wind are expensive, inefficient, harmful for the environment, and overall not feasible. People trying to push for renewable energy only want to make money.
00:37 what!! A bloody simple and easy to show pie chart would be my cover page..they should have that down pat..
lol, that's what those plastic flaps on the inside of a binder are for. total frauds.
They all had a flexie day off afterwards...
He should've asked what they did come prepared with, so we can see where our tax money is going towards.
absolutely appalling!
We didn't bring any data because we didn't think we would have to answer questions relevant to even the basic aspects of our jobs. Now can we have our paychecks? We have to get to a meeting where we discuss things completely irrelevant to climate change.
Well, if everyone thinks like that, I guess australia will become barely inhabitable, so maybe he should review his stance on the matter.
simple question....what is the perfect global temp????
China never said they would emit less. They said at some time in the future they will peak
God these people have stacks of papers and they do not even have the statistics.
I’ve watched a few clips with this senator now, and i like him.
Never ask a question when you don’t already know the answer
These are the same people telling me I have to wear a mask
what difference would it make if Australia reduced its carbon footprint significatly or even to 0? what impact would that have on the climate? im tipping so close to 0 you would not be able to tell?
Exactly,so the whole issue is the biggest scam ever perpetrated on mankind!
It’s like turning up to cook a dinner without the recipe or the ingredients ffs 🤷♂️
They never answer any questions
This all seems like info that they should know off hand, even if not specific numbers, they should know the trends if this is their area of “expertise”
Nuclear is the cleanest energy
These people are receiving salaries for this poor preparation?
6 people and one of them can't get on a phone to get the senators answers. We would be better off employing work for the dole ppl. They would probably do a better job.
wtf 1.3% so nothing aus does is meaningful
3:30 Arr Senator, look we have't come prepared for questions, just accept climate change and give the money we want.
funniest thing is when he starts asking questions he already has the answers on the page infront of him.... he just wants to find the bullshiters sucks hes not heading the party anymore... we need more people like him in our so call "liberal" party here in Canada...
This is what happens when gender trumps ability. Ffs, hurray for modern feminism.
what a stupid comment
@@conormitchell778 the ''hurray for modern feminism'' was meant ironically, i of course meant boo for modern feminism. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
That front panel has four men and two women..?
Maybe it's not the gender but the pure incompetence?
@@newera478 lol, but they all identify as women
@@newera478 is the woman speaking not the the leader of their group?
I guess she didn't have google.
Whatever you do, don't blame CHY-na.
From watching so many of these there seems to be a direct correlation between the length of a woman's hair and her level of intelligence/preparedness. .
Why don't you just mention their avowed identity of an "unprepared bureaucrat"? Why mention their ascribed identity of ladyness? Claiming that someone's ascribed identity affects their performance is unlikely to help your case. Wait are you at least an equal opportunity offender and not just somebody targeting someone for arbitrary reasons? Or do you say want you think is effective when you see someone as incompetent (ya know you don't actually believe it but you reckon it would bother such psychographic)?