Because we make the first assumption that we can think logical . We can then deduce that indeterminism is illogical , because it requires nothingness to cause something to do an action. There is a movie called Memento , this shows our memories are not the "truth " , but we just assume our memories are truth. This goes for logic as well , our logic could always be flaud , but we assume we are logical .
If free will is true, then choices have no consequences. The question is only if you believe your choices have no consequences. You certainly can make yourself believe that your choices have no consequences, and say, only fortunate externalities, but then you're a psycho. It's okay to be a psycho, an observation is not a criticism. The world needs its psychos. Understanding synchronization helps eventually bridge the gap to understanding how it looks free until you are not free. Metronomes ticking asynchronously on a table do not realize that they are slowly synchronizing with each other until suddenly they are synchronized with each other. Sometimes a few asynchronous metronomes might get "lucky", avoid early synchronization, and see a group of different metronomes synchronize. And, if metronomes could see and think, a yet-unsynchronized metronome might look a group of synched metronomes and think, "Oh man, look at them what happened there?!", and itself not realize that soon it will also join the synchronization. It thinks its special. Unique. A metronome needs a maker, no? Can't be having metronomes appear spontaneously in the vacuum, now can we? Would a grid of metronomes synchronize in a vacuum? Is gravity a real thing? We live in a world populated by children capable of reproduction. The Fisherian runaway of the neoteny catastrophe is real. I predict that by 2100, most of the survivors are Muslim. #yolo
"I think therefore I am" , even this is a assumption because reality can be very different from what we think . To make that conclusion you have to first assume that you can think logical . What I'm saying is we can know nothing fore sure , we just make assumptions that assume that we can understand the world.
"I think therefore I am" Is the foundations of philosophy. Though you have a point, it was a statement to prove that we exist, not what we are. It would be safer to say that you assume that we can understand while most people give up and just move on. Even in physics, "shut up and just do the math", might sound familiar.
@@maxwelldillon4805 Now you're thinken. But I was using it as an opening to philosophy, since nearly all philosophy courses start with Socrates famous quote "I think therefore I am."
Because we make the first assumption that we can think logical . We can then deduce that indeterminism is illogical , because it requires nothingness to cause something to do an action.
There is a movie called
Memento , this shows our memories are not the "truth " , but we just assume our memories are truth.
This goes for logic as well , our logic could always be flaud , but we assume we are logical .
If free will is true, then choices have no consequences. The question is only if you believe your choices have no consequences. You certainly can make yourself believe that your choices have no consequences, and say, only fortunate externalities, but then you're a psycho. It's okay to be a psycho, an observation is not a criticism. The world needs its psychos.
Understanding synchronization helps eventually bridge the gap to understanding how it looks free until you are not free. Metronomes ticking asynchronously on a table do not realize that they are slowly synchronizing with each other until suddenly they are synchronized with each other. Sometimes a few asynchronous metronomes might get "lucky", avoid early synchronization, and see a group of different metronomes synchronize. And, if metronomes could see and think, a yet-unsynchronized metronome might look a group of synched metronomes and think, "Oh man, look at them what happened there?!", and itself not realize that soon it will also join the synchronization. It thinks its special. Unique. A metronome needs a maker, no? Can't be having metronomes appear spontaneously in the vacuum, now can we?
Would a grid of metronomes synchronize in a vacuum? Is gravity a real thing?
We live in a world populated by children capable of reproduction. The Fisherian runaway of the neoteny catastrophe is real. I predict that by 2100, most of the survivors are Muslim. #yolo
"I think therefore I am" , even this is a assumption because reality can be very different from what we think .
To make that conclusion you have to first assume that you can think logical .
What I'm saying is we can know nothing fore sure , we just make assumptions that assume that we can understand the world.
"I think therefore I am" Is the foundations of philosophy. Though you have a point, it was a statement to prove that we exist, not what we are. It would be safer to say that you assume that we can understand while most people give up and just move on. Even in physics, "shut up and just do the math", might sound familiar.
"I think therefore I am" isn't an assumption, it is a given, because you cannot both think, and not exist.
@@maxwelldillon4805 Now you're thinken. But I was using it as an opening to philosophy, since nearly all philosophy courses start with Socrates famous quote "I think therefore I am."
How do you define free will such that you can preserve it in the face of superdeterminism?