วีดีโอ

47-thousand-pound excavator. Brand is Bantum.

Solid steel lines are custom made at hydraulic shops. If you have a small hole in one, take it off, blow air through it, wipe the outside of the pipe down with soap and water, use a welder and weld a ring or three around the hole to carbonize the oil on the inside, and when the pipe stops smoking, weld over the hole. If crushed, you can cut off the bad part, clean the pipe, cut an equivalent length, put the pipe back on the tractor and tack weld it, take it back off and take it to a professional welder. Taking the entire tractor to the hydraulic shop will give you the best result.

The engine oil is the easiest to answer. You want 10-W30 in the winter with a new engine, add 10 to the 30 if it is a hot summer and another 10 if the engine is old and smoking a bit. Same with hydraulic, use 45 if you are near the equator and 32 anywhere else. Most any tractor with a shuttle clutch uses hydraulic-transmission oil with the 1960 John Deer running 32 in transmission and the Massy Fergason running 90 but I put 62 in my Massy. I put 45 hydraulic-transmission oil in my Ford 555 shuttle clutch reservoir under the steering wheel but another 555 might need a different oil. Gear shift, use 90 weight (no synthetic) gear oil in all gear shifts unless otherwise specified.

I took it into Pertex Hydraulics with the hoses, they have three people there that are better at it than I am, though I wouldn't say that about any other company in Greensboro. I drive it along the side of a mountain, and it is very important that my steering doesn't go out on me. I have bought rebuild kits through Amazon and private companies that I found through Google search.

The Ford 555 is a 3-cylinder about 64hp and this one came with a backhoe attached. The 555 was a turning point in the 1970's and made a benchmark for all to follow. That said it is 50 years old and falling apart. The front-end loader beats anything out today with the same hp and if you find one expect to be fixing it the entire time you own it, and it is worth the work. It doesn't cut through sandstone well, but for ditches and other things it is tops. If you are buying new, I wouldn't recommend a John deer or Kabuto. New john deer's are designed to fail every three years and Kabuto is too small and only two sizes of their tractors match the front loader size to the tractor. For a backhoe, size matters, if it's not 14K pounds (about 6 metric tons) it just doesn't have the ass to do any real work. Case and JCB seam to have the best out, but Cat will fool you every once in a while. PS, my neighbor had a 12K pound mini excavator and a skid steer and ran circles around nearly anything a backhoe can do.

Thanks for your detailed answer.

The helix antenna requires a "same direction" twist for both the sender and receiver, and 2.5 turns works the best if I remember correctly. The problem that I came across was that in order to polarize; the photon and electron would need to be timed or changing distance slightly would change the polarization orientation. The upside, timing would solve gravity.

Clogs usually happen at oil filters and good systems have two filters, a screen and a paper filter. some are on the return line from the actuator to the tank and some from the tank to the pump. Heating is caused from the pump over working, usually from filters, but clogs at the intakes or inside of the pump, at the intakes or inside the actuator, or even from steel pipes that have been pinched from hitting something, are the main causes of heating. You shood note that hydraulics for the front loader and the steering are two different systems. For steering, you are looking for the pump, it usually has a plug on top to add steering oil. The filters are inside the pump and the pump must be taken apart while still on the tractor to change the filters. heating from steering usually comes from low oil level or clogged filters.

@@martinsoos much appreciated. I will change the filter then. I tried to clean it with diesel but I guess that didn't work. I will take a look at the pipes as well and see if their are any damage. If I don't come right I will give you a shout out again. Thanks again.

@@paulvorster1553 If it is the front loader you are having trouble with, th-cam.com/video/jN6AMdyJ19s/w-d-xo.html

EM waves are two dimensional from a vector point of view or even if we have a charge stuck on a two-dimensional plane. How is that for a bulshit answer. We can describe the effects of magnetic fields with math and hence not understanding what median the wave is moving through or even the properties of the wave. I think it would be easier to start with the properties of an electron and try to understand its frequency and phase change due to acceleration. And when I say phase change, I am assuming that electrons beside each other line up and synchronize with one another in a giant lattice that gets further and further out of synchronization with distance. I am also assuming that electron forces counter out in a large enough degree that it allows electrons to absorb photons, change frequency, and as they move, send ripple patterns through the matrix of electrons with resistance in free space of cores. Or at least, it is the only explanation I can come up with for "lines of force" that put iron filings in line patterns. So, a three D matrix inside a three-D matrix like looking through two picket fences as you are moving down a road. Only with math can I see it in two dimensions.

@@martinsoos So in the depictions of a photon waveform you have many wave crests and troughs. It seems to me that could be seen as the 2+1d view of it but that the 2d would just be two perpendicular vectors so the while traveling is a wave but once its intersection with/absorbtion by another, effectively 2d object, would be a 1d position. This isn't yet a well ruminated idea for me.

@@oneplaneteer1708 The purpose of finding a diameter of light for me was to determine what it could travel through at any set wavelength. The failure of that outcome and the idea that "if it was easy then it would have been found by now", both play a determining role in the conclusion that the system was even more complicated than I wanted to deal with. When I was 16, I concluded that I wanted to be a programmer because it was too complicated to be solved by math equations at the time, I didn't know that it would be too complicate for computers at even today's processing rates. So, two vortexes moving at the speed of light with opposite spins actually trace out a triple helix because just as the electron has spin up force or a spin down force, two vortexes that have locked together, step sideways and while twisting, create a third helical line of force. I couldn't find an equation for an ark length for a catenary back when I was teaching in the ASU Math lab, and it didn't shock me since I had always found math to be lacking. When I want to see something, I close my eyes.

@@martinsoos okay. I'll ask someone dumber.

@@oneplaneteer1708 I think you were talking to someone dumber, I re read your question. The depiction that I drew is the same depiction given to me in a graduate physics course at NC state "physics color and light". It depicts the magnetic wave front of a photon passing buy magnetic sensors. It is not depicting a photon. One, I did not pass that class, two the math was too hard for me, and three, as I pointed out to the professor, and he agreed that both the depiction and the equation did not have spin and photons have spin. sorry, long day.

I see no difference between justified belief and opinion. Why would someone have an opinion if it wasn't a justified belief. As for ontology, it is nothing more than mapping large sets and computer programming does that the best if you can program. I am at a loss as to how either deals with action vs. reaction and the root of action. Nice words to pull up though, I had to look them up.

I was running it hard on 14-inch-deep grass and it is near rebuild time.

@@martinsoos hmm yeah that's really odd to have no power like that. Usually you can mow up to 6ft tall in first.or second gear all day

I was in 3rd, and I agree that the radiator needs work. However, farming is about pushing equipment as far as you can push it. I also can't keep new equipment on the property, it gets stolen. Theft rings, I have experienced, usually involve sheriff deputies, so if you don't live there, have cameras, and keep your equipment near your house, you will be paying more for tractors than both the farm and you make. I will also note that since I put a bull in with the diesel and told all the deputies in the aria that I keep multiple dear cameras on property all the small thefts have stopped.

belts. There is more than one. And a lot easier and cheaper than finding a gearbox. I only paid $700 for the thing, "run it till you break it." This way when I go out to buy one that's over 5K I will have a better understanding of what to blow huge sums of money on. I would rather regret a cheap purchase.

So, I will assume that you believe that there are no particles smaller than an atom. I can't tell you that you are wrong, but I can still disagree. However, when you die and go to heaven, I want to be there to watch you explain to God how he can and can't build the universe.

​@@martinsoos I don't believe anything. There is simply no evidence for particles. If you want something "hard" that's "small", a nucleon would be a much better bet. It would, of course, still be an ontological mistake, but at least it would break down at the GeV rather than the 10eV scale. The problem most people are running into with modern physics is really one of education. I don't think we are doing a good job of telling students in high school what we actually know about the structure of the world. We are still pretending that it's better to teach a failed 19th century atomistic model than to tell them that at the end of the day all we can ever know about are (sometimes quantized) energy, momentum and angular momentum exchanges. In a sense we are already dishonest at the 12th grade level. If your remember high school physics, we make our students do exercises in momentum and energy transfer of the kind "An object with 1kg mass hits a resting objects of 9kg mass at 1m/s in a completely inelastic collision. Calculate the velocity of both objects.". Instead of "object" we could say "system" and instead of 1m/s we could specify the momentum of the moving system. Then it would become a completely "abstract" momentum conservation problem without the unnecessary specification that "the systems" are individual "solid objects" and that the forces between them are contact forces that they won't be able to calculate to begin with. The student could learn to apply the concept to e.g. gravitational interactions like the fly-by of a space probe near a planet to pick up angular momentum (and reach solar escape velocity) just as well as to billiard balls or car collisions. Once we are talking microscopic matter and radiation the "solid" structure goes out the window entirely and all there is left are the properties of energy, momentum, angular momentum and charges. Only god knows how your mind jumps from this trivial K-12 stuff to the donkey ventriloquator. :-)

@@schmetterling4477 I am only doing a thought experiment. The odds of it being correct is very small. And it ends with the premise that the smallest object would not have any other parts than itself and hence, no spin. It started with 1/2(mu)(frequency)^2(A)^2(V)=h(frequency) that being the formula for amplitude that actually fits for finding the amplitude of a photon. And when I say fits, it is real dicey putting in the Bohr radius and 21mm wavelength for hydrogen. And the dam thin is, I was able to get the same number to 12 dismal places with water and the frequency of the microwave oven. And then those numbers fit to nothing unless I really go off the deep end. Where I am going with this takes more computing power than anything we have even if we apply manifolds.

@@martinsoos Thought would have been good, indeed. ;-)

The stock market is where jerks and thieves can legally steel money from greedy and fearful fools. It is also a place to vote on companies that are bringing something to society. I agree with your thoughts 100%. I stayed out of stocks until I found companies to vote for; with my money.

@@martinsoos But it is not your money. Do you not read what is written on the bank notes?

@@YawnGod It's not my car, it's not my house, it's not my land. If you don't believe me then stop paying taxes. I am a Sheppard of what others will receive when I pass away.

When have you ever listened to you teachers?

As a machinist of 30 years, I can tell you there are a lot of hack jobs done to tractors, having done many myself. If we are talking about the small shaft of the hydraulic cylinder, then it is just as likely that someone dropped a pin in just to hold it and found out that they couldn't get it out again and sold the problem to someone else. First, look for the other possible problem, an engineer decided to do something fancy like a cross pin or a set screw to hold it in, meaning that there will be a way to push the pin out from the bottom. If not, then it is the hand drill that can be used. Use a punch with a single point on the front to indent a starting point for the drill. You can wrap paper around the front to better center the punch in the hole. Use a small split point drill first. I am assuming that if it was just a pin laying around the shop that it wasn't hardened to the point that a drill won't go through. If it rounds off the front of your punch, then you may have to drill from the bottom with a 1/4-inch drill or slightly larger and use a small rod to push out the pin. Else, finish up with a larger drill on top and use a round spiral EZ-out (for getting out broken bolts) by hammering it in and twisting as you hopefully pull it out. You want pressure on the cylinder when drilling and no pressure on the cylinder when pulling it out.

I was able to remove it after multiple applications of WD40, rocking it around and blowing out the debris with an air nozzle. I placed a really strong magnet above it and was able to wiggle and wobble it until there was very slight play. The magnet sucked it out. Lucky.@@martinsoos

@@ricktrojacek9890 Gratts, I have never been able to get that trick to work. Make sure you get a long enough rod to stick down in there or weld a smaller rod or bolt to it for the next time. Or sell it to someone you don't like. Gratts twice on that one. 🙂

You can describe people with only numbers. But people are more than just numbers. As photons are a propagation of energy. Can you tell me what the photon is propagating through, I can't? But I can make some WAGs (wild ass guesses). If I consider photons to propagate through something, have spin, have electromagnetic properties, ... I can start by asking if a photon is a two-dimensional object with its third dimension being vector velocity of c, then how big of a slit or hole can a photon of a set wavelength squeeze through. The thought experiment that I was working on said that anything with spin cannot be of a smallest single part, it must have 2 or more entities, or it cannot have spin. And the centers of the two or more entities might have a math equation that represents that distance between the two and already be in front of us. So, I would agree with bullshit; the math and hunt for equations was fun, except I was able to get the same answer from two different methods.

@William Bliss Here is the analysis of an amateur: “A photon's k vector can be Lorentz transformed.” - Here is another truism but with added tautology: A transformer transforms via transformation. “This is how We apply a relativistic Doppler shift.” - Ling We is a psychiatrist. She doesn’t study Doppler shift, she studies OBSOFL shifts. “We know that lateral dimensions are invariant to Lorentz transformations. This implies that all photons would have the same "width", that is, if they even have such a dimension.” - Actually, it implies that the photons with the different diameters (that they do have) will appear to an observed as their diameter doesn't change remaining different. Also, Sinec We taught in high school that there is no orthogonal component of wave vector, because, by definition, k points in the direction of wave (photon) propagation. “In general, though, from QFT we learn …” - Continue learning, not there yet. Concentrate first on the process of emission of quanta. Beware that neither QFT nor DFTs can handle that. How quantum field propagate and how quanta are absorbed will be the next steps. Note, besides QFT, one must learn to use CED and QED. In the last two, ED is for... electro-dynamics. “… photons don't seem to actually exist until they get absorbed.” - Nyz Schmet Lucid-Ling calls this Idealism-Maoism and suggests to those who say such things to imagine food and be full by absorbing it. Note, "things" here are not the same as matter as shown in "Wa'ze heck a foton?" by The Science Asylum. “What propagates is the EM Field.” - Con Fucius once said: “photon is field, field is filled with dark energy, dark energy is physical vacuum, physical vacuum is string oscillation, string is not real; and yet, I got a free education in a prestigious European university and freeloaded for 25 years building the CRNN hardon collider to stiffen a neutrino detector buried one mile under ground in granite rock - that’ how you do it.” He was a nasty $200k/year member of a 1000 fizicists team that spent $15 billion of the peoples money, but never divulge that the reality does't exist, the photons are not real, and we all live in a Hamiltonian operator matrix of Higg bozos.

@@martinsoos Dude, photons aren't propagating at all. You were simply not paying attention in high school when they explained the photoelectric effect to you. ;-)

"Lorentz transformed" would imply that we don't need mirrors for telescopes. We could use the same steel mesh that is used on microwave dishes. As a photographer, I can tell you for fact that it doesn't work.

@@schmetterling4477 I took a graduate physics course in "light and color". Not one of the equations gave light a spin. You will find that when smart people rely on their brains for their salary that they leave out anything that they don't know.

I would rule out roughness of surface, since I see it on many different surfaces. And I think we are talking about the interference that moves as we move. You can also produce the opposite by reflecting a laser against a wall. When the light comes back to the wall behind the laser, the green dots move in the same pattern as I move the laser. Like walking by one picket fence that is behind another.

The problem with taking too many physics courses is that in order to get the grade, you are required to except the answer required of you. "Energy is neither created no destroyed." Let's start with that. Every atom whether it is conductive or not is an electromagnetic system. That is the reason that I am looking at this problem more from the perspective of radio antennas but molecule size; capture, resonate, and release when requirements are met. Mostly I just don't except that a photon can be just erased from the equation.

@@martinsoos Totally agree, that academia kills free and independent thinking. Although, it goes beyond the education - all the overwhelming majority of research is conducted using government funding. In order to obtain this funding, you must adhere to a required way of thinking. All these are totally contrary to how majority of westerners think. And that, I think, is the main reason why ~ 80% of the graduate students of the science and engineering department of all US universities are from China and India. Back to physics - what if the photons are not cancelling each other but, rather, the electric fields of individual photons cancel each other? Same as in the sound cancellation earphones - the sound waves do not disappear, but the pressure fluctuations cancel. The sound waves "re-appear" after emerging from the area where they interfere with each other.

There is no "cut off" gap. For one, I am assuming too many things with low probabilities, and when you add up said probabilities the odds of truth of my models are almost 0. However, as a thought experiment, it puts the center of two vortex waves at 5 X 10^-10 times its wavelength. That being the electromagnetic forces to keep these two propagating waves together extend much further out. I was able to get a green laser to get through a 1.27 micron (50 millionths of an inch) slit and no smaller. That being 1.27X10^-9meters much larger than 2.7 X10^-16. So, I would say the forces holding together a photon is vastly stronger than the forces that would allow it to travel through a magnetic tunnel. With the magnetic tunnel being the electron and proton lattice of any solid structure.

@@martinsoos Maybe the accuracy of your models is zero, but the measurements are the reflection of reality. A possible interpretation of your experiment is that light with 0.532 micron wavelength propagates through a gap no less than 1.25 micron, i.e. 2.3 wavelength. What is the smallest gap for the lasers with 0.4 micron and for 0.6 micron wavelengths? Btw, there is a troll that derails discussions on other channels (for example, Huygens Optics, How Big Is a Photon?). This troll could be an eccentric person or, possibly, an AI bot with an algorithm that uses high level terminology and complex concepts and integrates it into complete nonsense. The algorithm is designed to format communication in an abrasive nasty way yet to address interests or "weak" points and hook the person on a lengthy communication thread.

... The eccentric/bot hunts only "photon" discussions by the amateurs and, thank God, ignores discussions related to goats (love it!) and any professional discussions.

@@thorsvedenborg3456 So you consider yourself both a troll and a bot. I prefer just being a troll myself, that way I'm not limited to just being a troll during photon conversations :-)

@@martinsoos Lol, I wish to be a bot, then I'd be much smarter. To be a troll requires a professional status that is much "higher" than mine. But some people who are experts in Lorentz transformation, relativistic shifts, non-existing photons, matrix operators and other Gobbledygook Science (as Sabine Hossenfelder calls it), tsuch people can be trolls. An example of a Gobbledgook physicist-troll can be found in "How Big is a Photon" youtube video by Huygens Optics - check posts by Schmetter Ling, a member of CERN and other "prestigious" institutions. I think his Blissful shadow appeared on your channel a day ago. It could be just a coincidence of writing styles. :) Going back to the reality and practical things - I'm greatly thankful for you sharing the wedge experiment results. It gave me a great material for thinking.

The chickens in the city just brought in rats.

Everything is Fated, but since we aren't Gods to know our fate, our ignorance will always give us hope. PS, turn your comments on your channel so I can tell you to make a video about that mud drink you make. Oh, wait, I just did.

@@martinsoos lol or you could just txt,lol :)

@@martinsoos you would have really loved what I made over the weekend, arugula,purple dead nettle, henbit, some chicory and ginger :) it was my anti-pollen tonic!!

@@shirtenvy8870 :-)

On the ram side, I forced(bent) the metal tab that was over the pin up and pulled the pin out with pliers (you may need to turn the tractor on to release any pressure on the steering wheel). After I pulled the pin, I turned the tractor on and ran the ram all the way to the back of the cylinder. That cleared it from the hole. On the swivel arm side, I used the special pliers with stubby wire tips to pull the lock ring off, though most people just use a couple of small screwdrivers and a had full of cuss words. Now for the bad news, with all engineering there are multiple was of doing the same thing. On both my Fords, they are held in with nuts.

You shouldn't have given you son that wooden sword and I didn't know that you made anything out of stone?

Hydraulic oil not getting to pump. Check filter in pump. It looks like it's in the pump where you add the steering fluid. I should do a video on it.

It's only when you have three or more Mic's that anyone starts caring. Or when 20 thousand dollars' worth of product gets returned to you. My biggest screw up was a $60k loss.