Yeah, this was a joke! lolololololol I wonder if I fooled anyone... Anyway, I think if I WERE to do this zoom legitimately, which I would never do, it would take about 10^210 iterations at the final zoom - because each new minibrot requires about 3 times more iterations than the one before it.
Funny you say that, I just watched a video explaining why that happens: th-cam.com/video/r6Rp-uo6HmI/w-d-xo.html Basically, to compress the data of a video to transmit it in a reasonable time, TH-cam uses not only compression algorithms on each individual frame, but interframe compression that takes advantage of relatively constant areas to avoid sending the same data repeatedly. So, for example, if a video mainly consisted of someone talking in front of a still background, TH-cam doesn’t have to send the same data about the background repeatedly; it can just tell each frame to copy from the one before. When some particle effect like snow or confetti is in a video, the large number of individual moving objects makes interface compression far less powerful since far more is changing onscreen, making the video quality plummet. The chaotic fuzz here has a similar effect to that, also making it hard for TH-cam to reuse the data.
@@KnakuanaRka Good Video! 👍 Yeah, actually it's not so much "TH-cam's compression algorithm" but Video compression in general. TH-cam is using video formats that your browser can play and these make use of the compressed data to unfold to your display.
LAST FRAME: 2 * 10^413 ITERATIONS!!! Actually, from Ultra Fractal by experiment, a magnification of 55.25 times (+/- 1 in 2000 parts at most) causes no visible shift from one West Brot to its next West Brot. So, the ratio of the logarithms of the magnification to iteration increase is log(55.25)/log(3.000) = 3.652. Given that the final West Brot is at 10^1502.1 magnification, this means it is the 1502/log(55.25) = 862.12 = 862nd West Brot - you can count if I'm wrong. The cumulative error would be at most (1.0005)^862 = 1.5386 < 55.25. Then there would be 3^862 * 100 = 1.899 * 10^413 iterations in the last frame! (Check: 1502 / 3.652 = 411.28 + 2 = 413.28) Sorry to split hairs, but this would undoubtedly be an UNPRECEDENTED RECORD IN ITERATIONS (10^413.3), much higher than the 10^210 estimate!
villager322 i think he did, it looked like that the zoom speed went from 1 to 1.2 then it looped over and over and over again, FAKER, FAKER PANTS ON FIRE!!!!!
Pretty close to what I got. My estimate was 2 * 10^200 iterations, approx 20 times the iterations per million times zoom was my working. Hadn't thought it through fully before but if you had every computer on earth rendering for the age of the universe you'd get approximately a 10^170th of the way through rendering a single pixel on the last frame! Now my brain hurts!
Cool! That is what happens when you zoom into the biggest minibrot in the Mandelbrot, and zoom into the biggest minibrot on that minibrot, a minibrot within a minibrot...
Aaron Rubin Of course I do. You can zoom into one of the boring areas, like 2+0i, and claim it is deepest Mandelbrot zoom ever. There really is no meaning to such a claim. That's what I was trying to say. By the way, I have known about Mandelbrot zooms since I was 2 years old. Maybe you should check out my Mandelbox flights. You should not simply assume that I am ignorant, as doing so reveals that you are ignorant yourself.
1. Because if you zoom in the the coordinate Carykh does the mini Mandelbrots become distorted. 2. It would take every computer on the planet combined longer than the age of the universe to render. 3. If you render deep zooms best practice is to avoid mini Mandelbrots because they are the slowest parts to render. 4. If somebody was trying to break a record they wouldn't want to make it look like a loop.
"Also, 1^∞ = 1!!!" About that... ...So, the number e, more formally known as Euler's constant, is defined as "the limit as n approaches infinity of the function f(n) = (1 + (1/n))^n". So if we actually plug in infinity for n, then the f(n) side becomes e by definition, and the other side becomes (1 + (1/∞))^∞. Anything divided by infinity is zero, so the 1 + (1/∞) becomes 1 + 0, which in turn becomes just 1. That gives us e = 1^∞. e = 1^∞. That's right, no matter how many times you multiply 1 by itself, it stays 1, until you do it an infinite number of times and suddenly it jumps up to e. Now where's the mistake I inevitably made in figuring out this paradox?
Clownpiece a) infinity isn't a number, it's more of an abstract mathematical construct b) e is a limit, so to properly calculate (read: approximate) it you need to plug in an abstractly large number for n (which we know can't include infinity). also I'm pretty sure that even if we did allow infinity as a number, any non-zero value for x in (x/inf) would result in +/-{insert lowercase epsilon here} as you're separating the number into infinitely smaller chunks, thereby creating an infinitesimal
It’s Simple. If z*y5 of the minibrot, 10x20 Max iterations, zooming in and out of nonsense and Neturonics or protonics, If lower can be zoomed in too long enough!
+Anaml Maps It means 100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000. Yep.
I think posting, how much you zoomed in into the Mandelbrot set picture, to show you've got the record has no sense. I could zoom just in the middle of the picture, and keep it completely black for next 6 hours, so I can say I've done Deepest zoom ever (something like 10^100 000).
Joke or not, this is in fact what a zoom to this depth would look like. No calculation is needed because the pattern is predictable. Which also means any talk about "the record for deepest Mandelbrot zoom" is pointless, unless you restrict it to an area where you actually need to calculate the iterations to generate the image.
![[안방1열 풀캠4K] 베이비몬스터 'DRIP' (BABYMONSTER FullCam)│@SBS Inkigayo 241110](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/AQ4RIghEvUs/mqdefault.jpg)
Yeah, this was a joke! lolololololol
I wonder if I fooled anyone...
Anyway, I think if I WERE to do this zoom legitimately, which I would never do, it would take about 10^210 iterations at the final zoom - because each new minibrot requires about 3 times more iterations than the one before it.
In retrospect, it seems like a bad idea to pull a prank on the internet without announcing it. far too many people like to be upset about things.
Nice:)
?
And even if your computer COULD do that many iterations, youtube would compress it to the point where it becomes pretty much unwatchable.
But, what Mandelbrot explorer is maximum iterations 10^210? Please answer real, NOT fake!
i just like how youtube's compression algorithm just absolutely destroys everything
Funny you say that, I just watched a video explaining why that happens: th-cam.com/video/r6Rp-uo6HmI/w-d-xo.html
Basically, to compress the data of a video to transmit it in a reasonable time, TH-cam uses not only compression algorithms on each individual frame, but interframe compression that takes advantage of relatively constant areas to avoid sending the same data repeatedly. So, for example, if a video mainly consisted of someone talking in front of a still background, TH-cam doesn’t have to send the same data about the background repeatedly; it can just tell each frame to copy from the one before.
When some particle effect like snow or confetti is in a video, the large number of individual moving objects makes interface compression far less powerful since far more is changing onscreen, making the video quality plummet. The chaotic fuzz here has a similar effect to that, also making it hard for TH-cam to reuse the data.
........
Kenny Cheung Sorry if that was a bit dense for you; just watch the linked video.
@@KnakuanaRka Good Video! 👍 Yeah, actually it's not so much "TH-cam's compression algorithm" but Video compression in general. TH-cam is using video formats that your browser can play and these make use of the compressed data to unfold to your display.
@@KnakuanaRka kfhubvff111
please zoom into some of the pink static
It doesn't allow that
hey, check out dinkydau00s hard zoom where he zooms into the green static
No 10^19
TH-cam suck
No allowed a static
As much as I love deep Mandelbrot zooms, couldn't you have chosen a more interesting place to zoom in to?
ElectroCat I figure it'd be harder
ElectroCat its fake btw
It’s a joke; it repeats after some point.
ElectroCat that is the joke -_-
O
About a minute into a video, I just thought "Anyone could just loop this and it would be the same thing... oh wait" hahaha
LAST FRAME: 2 * 10^413 ITERATIONS!!!
Actually, from Ultra Fractal by experiment, a magnification of 55.25 times (+/- 1 in 2000 parts at most) causes no visible shift from one West Brot to its next West Brot. So, the ratio of the logarithms of the magnification to iteration increase is log(55.25)/log(3.000) = 3.652. Given that the final West Brot is at 10^1502.1 magnification, this means it is the 1502/log(55.25) = 862.12 = 862nd West Brot - you can count if I'm wrong. The cumulative error would be at most (1.0005)^862 = 1.5386 < 55.25. Then there would be 3^862 * 100 = 1.899 * 10^413 iterations in the last frame! (Check: 1502 / 3.652 = 411.28 + 2 = 413.28)
Sorry to split hairs, but this would undoubtedly be an UNPRECEDENTED RECORD IN ITERATIONS (10^413.3), much higher than the 10^210 estimate!
@@keonscorner516 is this a cryptic message?
It's 10% of a. Quingentillion zoom
You're right. I'm not too sure if I was the one that originally thought of the 10^210 estimate, but it certainly was underestimated.
alternative title: zooming into a pink static with a line of mandelbrots sets
How can you be so sure that this is is not a legitimate zoom?
Yea it looks like its looped
@@user-ij8qq7xx4e and plus, if it were a legitimate zoom, it would take 10^210 iterations, which no computer has the ability to do.
@@zfloyd1627 He should hold the "Smartest clickbait" world record
@@user-ij8qq7xx4e yes. Yes he should. (Phineas and Ferb reference).
Hey Michael!
if i could make a livestream that would last forever, i would use this with a counter in the corner counting the iterations XD
I think it would end at some point, though. Probably at our universe.
i dont know why but this shape is creepy for me
LISTAS BRASIL why
It creeps me out because it's just this black void with uncanny edges.
I have a strange feeling that I agree with you.
@@phlog_dog7336 Nah It Looks Like Pac-Man
12:00 that is called a macro minibrot
0:13 TH-cam, THIS ISN'T HELPING!
I see a 10^4004 deep zoom.
SeryZone X
Finds
At 2:14:06
Lol you just looped it didn't you XD
villager322 i think he did, it looked like that the zoom speed went from 1 to 1.2 then it looped over and over and over again, FAKER, FAKER PANTS ON FIRE!!!!!
villager322 also what gave it away was the pixilation was looping.
villager322 Try it out yourself.
Put it in 2x speed
Brendan Scott omg ur right
i cannot believe, i got pranked by 11 year ago Cary Huang.
Zooming into a minibrot and doing the exact same thing on the minibrot repeat
Imagine your own brain processing this!!!
If the final pixel was 1 planck volume in size
How large will the mandelbrot set be?
Hmmm.
I don't know.
How large is our universe?
Well the full size could be somewhat larger than even that!
UNDEFINED.
Pretty close to what I got. My estimate was 2 * 10^200 iterations, approx 20 times the iterations per million times zoom was my working. Hadn't thought it through fully before but if you had every computer on earth rendering for the age of the universe you'd get approximately a 10^170th of the way through rendering a single pixel on the last frame! Now my brain hurts!
I zoomed into 0+0i, deepest zoom ever
I think that location is the prettiest out of all.
Blank void zoom
Looking into the static that wasn't compressed, we can clearly see that it was faked. It doesn't get any more static-y after 0:19.
I can't imagine how it would get more static-y anyway.
*10^12 10^13
just 12 minutes of zooming repeatedly into this one minibrot which is surrounded by compressed pink tv static.
I love how this is a cycle that the fact that they are so many mandelbrot main figures
Cool! That is what happens when you zoom into the biggest minibrot in the Mandelbrot, and zoom into the biggest minibrot on that minibrot, a minibrot within a minibrot...
.....to 10^12.
This music is really good
In 25 seconds or by 10^025,you would've zoomed the entire observable Universe!!!
Does this even count??
There's no meaning to "counting" anyways. You can just zoom in on a pointless point like this and say "OMG DEEPEST ZOOM EVAR GIVE ME A MEDAL!!"
Starmute VII You don't know what a Mandelbrot Zoom is do you?
Aaron Rubin
Of course I do. You can zoom into one of the boring areas, like 2+0i, and claim it is deepest Mandelbrot zoom ever. There really is no meaning to such a claim. That's what I was trying to say. By the way, I have known about Mandelbrot zooms since I was 2 years old. Maybe you should check out my Mandelbox flights. You should not simply assume that I am ignorant, as doing so reveals that you are ignorant yourself.
Unfortunately no. If this is real, it would have a depth of 2^4990, but it actually has a depth of 2^48.
stop being rude
1. Because if you zoom in the the coordinate Carykh does the mini Mandelbrots become distorted.
2. It would take every computer on the planet combined longer than the age of the universe to render.
3. If you render deep zooms best practice is to avoid mini Mandelbrots because they are the slowest parts to render.
4. If somebody was trying to break a record they wouldn't want to make it look like a loop.
With today's technology, somebody has zoomed into the mandelbrot as far as 10^122768
@@_redniel_ Wait, is it not still 10^xx,xxx? Since when was a 6 digit exponent possible
Googol iterations?
10^1502, That is 1502 zeroes XD
Yep
No shit.
"Also, 1^∞ = 1!!!"
About that...
...So, the number e, more formally known as Euler's constant, is defined as "the limit as n approaches infinity of the function f(n) = (1 + (1/n))^n". So if we actually plug in infinity for n, then the f(n) side becomes e by definition, and the other side becomes (1 + (1/∞))^∞. Anything divided by infinity is zero, so the 1 + (1/∞) becomes 1 + 0, which in turn becomes just 1. That gives us e = 1^∞.
e = 1^∞.
That's right, no matter how many times you multiply 1 by itself, it stays 1, until you do it an infinite number of times and suddenly it jumps up to e.
Now where's the mistake I inevitably made in figuring out this paradox?
Clownpiece
a) infinity isn't a number, it's more of an abstract mathematical construct
b) e is a limit, so to properly calculate (read: approximate) it you need to plug in an abstractly large number for n (which we know can't include infinity).
also I'm pretty sure that even if we did allow infinity as a number, any non-zero value for x in (x/inf) would result in +/-{insert lowercase epsilon here} as you're separating the number into infinitely smaller chunks, thereby creating an infinitesimal
It's looped
Yep. He's starting Season 13 soon.
Mandelbrot set factory
someone made a video not this early in time but he did a 10^2056
i would like to callit "breaking the mandelbrot set"
correct me if im wrong, but this is the calculation for the iterations 3^{1502}. the calculator couldnt load the output
4,326379269E716 is the output
amazing video
It's Just A Zoom That's Minibrot To Minibrot
The zoom is showing the same pattern on and on
Infinity minibrots. For infinity. Forever.
it looks like hes trying to create a mandelbrot bfb intro lol
what even funnier that this is made by cary
whats*
Actually it is 10^2140.
this is the true record
It's looped
Zooming into Antenna
Why would a BFDI maker post a Mandelbrot zoom
This location is very peculiar for symmetric pertubilie.
whats the freaking song already???????
so wait, we just watched a bunch of hole going to the right...
I like your video
Break your own record, so it's harder for other people to.
Everyone's talking about how bad the YT compression is, but it is NOWHERE as bad as WeChat's compression algorithm.
I don't believe it. lol It's just a loop of the same thing and you slapped a number on it.
Even Though This Record May Be Fake, There Are Already Zooms That Go 10X Further Than This.
You mean 10^1503? wow!
Miles Flaherty Stop talking Like This. Every Word Doesn't Need A Capital.
no some words do need a capital
Idiot it’s just not decorated
There is something here... Like... a leaf?!
The number was 228.694 nonnonagintquadringentillion
Last comment for this Mandelbrot Zoom! You stopped holding a world record when deeper Mandelbrot Zooms came in before this decade.
It’s Simple.
If z*y5 of the minibrot, 10x20 Max iterations, zooming in and out of nonsense and Neturonics or protonics, If lower can be zoomed in too long enough!
You beat Orson Wang!
TheOdd1sOut has left the chat.
who seen a lot of minibrots?
what program did you use?
I remember seeing this on a Odd1sout video
which one
Umm what does 10^1502 mean?
A 1 with 1502 zeros... 100000000000000000000000000000...000000000000000000000000000000000000000
+Anaml Maps It means 100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000. Yep.
You do 10 X 10... X 10 X 10 until you have 1,502 10s.
15 googols and 10 left over.
1 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
I think posting, how much you zoomed in into the Mandelbrot set picture, to show you've got the record has no sense. I could zoom just in the middle of the picture, and keep it completely black for next 6 hours, so I can say I've done Deepest zoom ever (something like 10^100 000).
ɯǝʇoʇɐʍZ lol
Kevin MacLeod Hypnothis
How many Earths can into the Mandelbrot???
One myrillion (10^603). I guess
altho this is a never stooping picture i guess its just infinite
1 Myrillion (10^30,003)
∞
that fucking bitrate though
Lololo mandelbrot set see u what now?
He have minibrot
2 seconds is enough
It was becoming neutbrot
00:17
THE PALETTE LENGTH IS SO LOW AAAAAAA
and WHAT IS A MANDELBROT??
+Anaml Maps a mathematitian
A famous fractal Benoit Mandelbrot invented named after himself.
Music?
Hyphotis
Laaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaadies and geeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeentlemen, a NEW WORLD RECORD!
It's looped
And it's not a world record
The same brot isn't supposed to zoom past over and over like that....... it's supposed to magnify, really!!!!!!!;
i dreamed of this
10^10010
How can we be sure it is? O_O
You could have found a more interesting location. But then, that would have been harder to fake.
What did you use to make this?
It's looped
@@petterlarsson7257 huh i didn't know i wrote this 8 yr old comment
its a code, rendering a fractal
whats a mandlebrot
To 11:47,Look At The Mandelbrot Time!
we need to go deeper :)
Like a real 10^20000+
The "pink static" is what we need to zooooooooom in to
You can't.
15%
Kalles Fraktaler Final - e20003
No e20004
does the Mandelbrot has more diameter than the universe?
If the last image of the deepest mandelbrot zoom was 1 planck length, then the entire thing would be approximately 10^19000 lightyears big
I hear ThunderBirds101's outro music :D
I just wasted my time rendering a 2^1600 zoom, then I realised you were using 10^, then I realized you cheated!
loop in the end
Wow...
Prediction- word record: 10^5000
That has already been achieved in August 2013.
@@SamHalls2015 the highest I have ever found was 10^20000+ I think
That means the Number was 100 Nonnonagintillionquadringentillion
...yes...
Another old comment spotted!
You mean 100 novemnonagintaquadringentillion
@@keonscorner516 Yes. I haven't checked on abbreviations of numbers bigger than 10^600 for a long time.
I will keep the comment the same however as it has a bit of a history value to me.
93849283820010928101938828392838299201983839209383838839388392938280102982828182777182882718928289393838483892920838392929849382839999393882839282828929293838388393939939383939922920100102929298382382892833828838389293929929392939392992929299293939392992938139838992993838292883939283939388393939292002939493029939029292992020292020020202093939023992020292002020292929929393020293993929299392039029392939393903039939293993920298029392029839392993929393993939393939920192001929288383393992939290292092⁴¹⁴²³¹³ ←deep mandelbrot (km)
the mandel brot is 1 googolplexianitetheron bromtometers in size
Joke or not, this is in fact what a zoom to this depth would look like. No calculation is needed because the pattern is predictable. Which also means any talk about "the record for deepest Mandelbrot zoom" is pointless, unless you restrict it to an area where you actually need to calculate the iterations to generate the image.
I don't think the graphic is good enough LOL
no offense, but there are some other videos that go to 10/\4000 and above
NUMBERS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!
Yey cary
11:53,I mean