Yes it does rhyme n yes it’s still true. 5 months later the horrifying truth of your words continues to unfold to reveal its true depth and impending doom thank you so much. I wish I had listened sooner
New-fangled data about powers of coming age is prolific. Phisically, it shapes our reality, it dilate submassively upcoming prospects and mankind bearings, personally some 5 or so years ago we couldn't even imagine such a boom of AI and how rapidly it gained acknowledgement worldwide...It is still a Shakespearing question whether or not it would find a plausible application in such areas as a treatment!? And whether or not a riot of robots took place on mother Earth in nearest future? Just a nightmare of science fiction... But could it be plausible enough... Philosophically speaking is it boon or evil? I rather vote for a second one. Online corrupts. Technology also.
@@bazsnell3178 Well, Trump didn't advise anyone to drink bleach for a start. If the speaker is cavalier with spreading her own disinformation within the first few minutes or her talk then it undermines anything she says thereafter.
@@markkelly9621 A closed minded dismissal of what the speaker had to say in light of this one statment is hardly merited or useful but I agree that she should have been less cavalier with Trump's statements. That said, the way he phrased them concerning bleach and disinfectants were sufficiently rambling and ambiguous to lead a lot of people to believe that he was suggesting ingesting them. I would say her point stands because there followed a substantial increase in calls to poison control, so much so that companies like Lysol found it necessary to issue warnings against ingesting their products.
@@TheOwlman There was more than one inaccurate statement made. I gave an example as requested. You can call it a closed minded response, but why would I continue to listen to a lengthy talk when within a few minutes of starting the speaker has made a number of very dubious claims. If you're an academic then you should be better prepared to avoid making such inaccurate statements. There are quite a lot of other videos on TH-cam to watch or listen to, I can choose to stop watching of I don't think a video is worth my time.
@@markkelly9621 _There are quite a lot of other videos on TH-cam to watch or listen to, I can choose to stop watching of I don't think a video is worth my time._ Quite so.
very insightful talk. thank you!
Amazing how many people come here still attacking marie Antoinette or defending Trump….
Misread that. I thought it said that people are attacking Marie Antoinette FOR defending Trump. That’s not true, is it?
She talks about the truth and climate change in the same breath 😵💫😵💫😵💫
In the light of Brexit, will there have a UK act. Will BS issue the CEN standards as BS EN.
Yes it does rhyme n yes it’s still true. 5 months later the horrifying truth of your words continues to unfold to reveal its true depth and impending doom thank you so much. I wish I had listened sooner
New-fangled data about powers of coming age is prolific. Phisically, it shapes our reality, it dilate submassively upcoming prospects and mankind bearings, personally some 5 or so years ago we couldn't even imagine such a boom of AI and how rapidly it gained acknowledgement worldwide...It is still a Shakespearing question whether or not it would find a plausible application in such areas as a treatment!? And whether or not a riot of robots took place on mother Earth in nearest future? Just a nightmare of science fiction... But could it be plausible enough... Philosophically speaking is it boon or evil? I rather vote for a second one. Online corrupts. Technology also.
I am having trouble following your point.
(Wonders if this comment was written by AI...)
@@HLBear The new large language models are more coherent than that. You need a real human to generate that sort of nonsense.
8/7/2024
The amount of misinformation in this talk is stunning. She is,totally brainwashed.
Please explain
Accusations are easy, but worthless without backing. If you wish to condemn her, do so with specific examples.
I reckon she’s a Soros acolyte
I think it a bad idea to complain about misinformation but then recklessly use your own disinformation in the video....
What disinformation? Please be specific....
@@bazsnell3178
Well, Trump didn't advise anyone to drink bleach for a start.
If the speaker is cavalier with spreading her own disinformation within the first few minutes or her talk then it undermines anything she says thereafter.
@@markkelly9621 A closed minded dismissal of what the speaker had to say in light of this one statment is hardly merited or useful but I agree that she should have been less cavalier with Trump's statements. That said, the way he phrased them concerning bleach and disinfectants were sufficiently rambling and ambiguous to lead a lot of people to believe that he was suggesting ingesting them. I would say her point stands because there followed a substantial increase in calls to poison control, so much so that companies like Lysol found it necessary to issue warnings against ingesting their products.
@@TheOwlman
There was more than one inaccurate statement made. I gave an example as requested.
You can call it a closed minded response, but why would I continue to listen to a lengthy talk when within a few minutes of starting the speaker has made a number of very dubious claims.
If you're an academic then you should be better prepared to avoid making such inaccurate statements.
There are quite a lot of other videos on TH-cam to watch or listen to, I can choose to stop watching of I don't think a video is worth my time.
@@markkelly9621 _There are quite a lot of other videos on TH-cam to watch or listen to, I can choose to stop watching of I don't think a video is worth my time._ Quite so.
🤦🏾♂
Propaganda