@AndreasSpiess, ar 3:12 you seem to be using full ESP32 devkits. They were notorious for high power usage due to very crappy USB-serial bridges. The bare "canned" submodule is much more energy efficient, suitable for battery use.
All the hackers and network testers will be happy to see the 5ghz channel. While the rest of us will be happy to leave the crowded 2.4ghz network. What it can act as a bridge? Way cool.
all the other model can do it with just a single radio, now it can do 2.4 to 5g bridge hopefully, well have to wait for the esp32 nat router to update, hopefully the speed is better
Don't be so excited, 5GHz has shorter reach... 2.4 is really great in that regard, and i wonder if ESP can even saturate 5GHz bandwith... But it is nice addition for in home behind wall or two devices for sure.
I'm just designing my first full "production level" PCB with an ESP32 right at this moment. Thank so very much, Andreas! I had no f*ing idea that an old software guy (25y in software) could learn proper hardware. PCBAs "fabs" already have the C5 modules, btw... It's epic we can develop stuff in near real time like this... Thanks again :)
I also am designing my first full production level PCB with an ESP32 right at this moment, also 25y in the IT industry. Started at AOL tech support in 1997. "Welcome! You've got mail!" 🤣
Andreas, those Aqara motion sensors. I also have 2 of those. Working every single day in the living- and diningroom reporting movement and the Lux in the area. I have never replaced a battery in them. Just looked them up ... I received them on 9 feb 2021 so that is 4 years of working non stop now. Almost unbelievable. Makes me think on how much energy is being thrown away on some other products. Oww and the 5GHz, was just looking yesterday if nothing changed after ordering ESP32's about 3 years ago and was dissapointed in them not having 5GHz. So now we wait for stock.
At last the dual band on expressif 👍 I wish they did not abandonned to Ethernet PHY and would have brought a 10Mb/s MAC as well... This would make a great WCH alternative and a MCU multiknife 🎉 Meanwhile we have to choose between wifi and ethernet on RISC V 🥴
Having ethernet and WiFi in the same project is probably not a typical scenario. At least here, I usually decide which connection I need and then decide on the chip. The SW interfaces are very similar.
@AndreasSpiess Well having both means you can design either redundant ethernet or use the radio for non wifi scenarii for bridge/edge deployment and keep the core full Ethernet+IP. Plus it means you use only one chip/design for all your customer deploymen choices. Here for building IoT if it is WiFi people might choose Espressif for good reasons, but if WiFi is not acceptable for usual security reason then you will have to move to WCH or others ... Or plan to have a board design that accept boths. This adds costs to the bottom line. I would have thought they would have brought a 10base T1S compatible chip, the first MCU with a PHY/MAC on board for it. Definitivelly a killer for automotive or building IoT if they keep the same price point... Thanks for your great videos 👍
@@testman9541 The standard ESP32 is still actively supported, and the P4 also has RMII. ESP-IDF does now have support for 1 RMII phy for 10Base-T1S also. I do agree it'd be nice to have seen it on more of their chips, however its quite clear the C series in particular is specifically for wireless applications.
@callumkingunderwood Nice that T1S is there in idf tnx 👍but unlike WCH there have no phy bundled which means increasing the BOM 🥴 which also means that for T1S you still have to bring a pricey T1S phy 😭 Look like the ESP32 original is most becoming a "legacy" as none outside P4 of the other offspring have brought any wired ethernet ... And none have PHY. Odd.
Amazing. I've always wondered why so few radios included a 5Ghz radio. Sort of assumed it was some process or FET/silicon technology limitation. Now if they just made a 100 pin package version, we could use it for literally everything.
@@AndreasSpiess Would it? I always wonder about this. Adding more GPIO logic and pad drivers would be only a small amount of silicon, I would image. But maybe adding just the area to bond out 30+ more GPIO's might take a tone of area and make it totally uneconomical. Same for the actual packaging, too. But I don't know the economics of it. Still - a high-gpio ESP32-* would be pretty useful.
If both radios can run at once, this would conceivably allow one to light up a BT to WiFi gateway/proxy device (similar to ESPhome BT proxies) but with much better performance. The 5.8GHz radio can stay in touch with the network while 2.4 is open to receive BT traffic.
I got two sample devkits (with metal case) 3 weeks ago and have been playing with them since. My projects involves 8 channel audio 24/44 over UDP - which works nicely in the 5 GHz band with 11ax 😁 I measured an iperf throughput of about 62 MBit/s with a UDP payload of 1440 bytes and an average UDP packet latency of 540 +/- 180 μs (yeah, jitter). Not too bad for an engineering sample, huh?
Wow, it is exciting to see a RISC-V microcontroller that supports both 2.4 and 5 GHz dual-band Wi-Fi 6! ESP32-C5 looks very promising. I hope it will be as affordable as ESP32-C3 or ESP32-C6. Thank you for the video! Btw do you plan to visit FOSDEM 2025?
5.8GHz is fine if you want highspeed over a shorter range, but if the ESP32 can't or does not need the highspeed data rates then 2.4GHz will be just fine. Which is why if you want lower power or greater distances you drop back to lower frequency's or much slower data rates and hence narrower bandwidths.
@@AndreasSpiess In my mum's house the 2.4GHz only just about gets out of the room. i would not expect 5.8GHz to get out of the room at all. we had to put a wifi over mains extender to get a good signal in the kitchen which has only one wall between it and the router. One good thing is it's very electrically quiet and your mobile don't ring much. 🙂
Thank you for evaluating the 5.8 GHz ESP32. Sad, that it is so power hungry. What I am really missing in my home automation is a low power (e.g. zigbee) epaper display unit running on batteries. BTW: I converted all my aqara motion sensors to AA. They are running for years and I have not to touch (and adjust) the sensors when replacing the batteries.
These things are typically power hungry because they aren't going to sleep. You probably won't do it on a dev board but deep sleep on a c6 is meant to be 10uA which is a little high (smaller mcus get down around 3) but should still last a year on some AAA cells. Then it wakes up, pulls the power for a few milliseconds and goes back to sleep. The difference with wifi and ZigBee is the setup time, wifi is often seconds, ZigBee doesn't have one, just wake up and blast your packet then go back to sleep. There is very little that you can do if you want to Rx signals in something like real time that remains low power. There are some wifi modes that come close but that's more solar power will keep it alive than pure battery will last for months.
@@AndreasSpiess My PIRs are hidden on furnitures or similar objects. So, I can also hide the batteries on or in these furnitures. Some of them are placed quite deep and upside down. I have them in every room and I trigger all the Ikea zigbee ceiling light panels with them - via ioBroker.
@@zyeborm Thank you, I started home automation in 2011 using the Homematic system. Those units are using 868MHz and draw little current during sleeping or listening. During communication they are using 20mA up to 30mA for one or two seconds. They also have a very good battery life.
I guess its nice to have a 5Ghz option. But would have preferred a 1.2Ghz Wifi when it comes IOTs. (no such thing I know). For IOTs I'm ALWAYS in need of more range and never more bandwidth.
If you want to measure the power consumption properly, you need to disconnect the jumper and power the MCU directly. This will avoid measuring consumption of USB-UART adapter and on-board LDO.
@@AndreasSpiess I use multiple ADCs in practically all of mine. Monitoring and/or controlling a solar panel or wind gen system, monitoring and/or controlling charge systems or inverter systems as examples. Monitoring home energy use. The STM32 series have a wonderful array of analogue peripherals, but lack WiFi. The ESP has very nice WiFi, but horrible analogue. It's a real pity to have to cobble two devices together when one should really do.
It would be really useful if I had a Meshtastic node which connected to the internet for mqtt, but was still accessible over Bluetooth for configuration - this might just do that (although the power consumption needs work!)
This is very cool and a long time coming, as you pointed out! But I don't understand the mention of "5.8" GHz, is it specific to a particular region? 802.11a was defined all the way back in 1999, and most bands are closer to 5GHz than 5.8GHz. What's so specific about 5.8GHz here? In the original bands (U-NII-1, U-NII-2/2e, U-NII-3) only channel 161 is over 5.8GHz. This makes me wonder if if will support the common bands used indoors (5.15-5.25) or if this chip is actually limited to some very specific channels. Channel 161 at 5.805 GHz is usually more recommended for long-range outdoors use, which isn't particularly where I use my Espressif chips to be honest. Even in newer standards 5.8GHz still only means channels 149-161 so this feels weirdly limited.
You are right about the frequencies. They only differ a bit between regions. I could have used 5GHz, but many people confuse it with 5G cellular technology. In Amateur Radio, our Band is called 5.8GHz. This is why I used it here. But after your comment, I changed the title to 5GHz.
@AndreasSpiess Interesting... Why is using the chip a bad idea?? I've been watching some little chip antennas with dual bands for a while... Waiting for this exact moment... And yes, I want to use only the chip Why you don't recommend this?? I know it is high frequency but I already built a lot in 2.4GHz 🤔
@@crisdores If you have the knowledge on transmission lines and the instruments to check if your design is ok, then you can forget my comment of the course.
I'm working at a smart home company and we wanted to use the ESP32-H2 with Matter over Thead. We decided against it because of the high current consumption. I think it is even too high for a mains powered device. At least for some regulations or something in Germany. (I'm just a software guy, the hardware guys know better)
thx, but havent you got any announcement when to expect the product to arrive on the market ? 3 years from first video to know was a quite long time and I had hope to hear something like available from eastern 2025
hello thank you for your videos ! i've a question - My project need to connect an arduino micro + 1 multiplexer to 32 potentiometers to make a midi controller - How do you do for a good cables connection management ? - i mean 3 cables start from each pots + each pots need to be link each other with a cable + each pots need to be link to the arduino - 🙃so it is crazy !!! a pcb will be great but it's difficult for me 😄 so
I would create a PCB and check if you need 2 or 4 layers. Both are not terribly expensive if the board is not too big. Or you can use more than 1 multiplexer close to the potentiometers even if you do not need all pins. I2C lines could be easier to route.
Do the ESP32-C5 and C6, with their HP and LP cores, support SMP in FreeRTOS by utilizing the LP core as a second real processor? If not, does multitasking still improve overall performance or speed? This would be particularly useful for a use case where a sensor is being read while the data is simultaneously transmitted via wireless communication in real time, with minimal delay (e.g., millisecond-level).
I never looked at the LP core on these chips. Only at the LP core of the ESP32. There, it had very limited functionality and had to be programmed in assembler. So most probably no SMP
I have already 150+ 2.4 GHz devices in my house - time to move them to 5GHz - just waiting for C5 to surface one day ;-) Wondering if ESPnow will also work on 5GHz
I watched Great Scott's video earlier today concerning ESP32 and Zigbee. Since I'm not familiar with Zigbee yet, I may be wrong about this, but I thought he found the current draw to be minuscule. Was he just measuring the RF draw of an existing commercial device (he had a few), or did I misinterpret his testing?
He was measuring the total current consumption on a commercial device. Not necessarily c6, he didn't address what chip it was in the video. These modules may be capable of lower power operation with some optimisation.
As mentioned, I got an engineering sample. I assume they have to produce now for the mass market...
8 วันที่ผ่านมา
Hi I would like to request to make a helmet intercom system that can provide a minimum coverage distance of 500 meters. The system should ensure clear and reliable communication within this range.
It looks to be sequential The design turns to release could differ Probably took a bit more time to add the 5.8GHz radio to the c5 The c6 is only 2.4GHz Both have wifi6
I don't really get the point of 5GHz wifi in microcontrollers. They don't benefit from the extra bandwidth, and it eats more power than the 2.4GHz band. The only advantage would be in areas where the 2.4 is very congested but the 5.8 is still mostly clean. But since it's all about having options, I don't mind it being added - as long as it doesn't cause extra burdens when not in use.
Congested areas are for sure a big thing. Power consumption in my tests was similar to 2.4GHz. And remember: Bill Gates once thought that 640kB RAM would be enough for everybody ;-)
I don't know why but this thought is coming to my mind..all these years this chip was collecting data for DeepSeek 😞 Thats why no one else could make a wifi chip so cheap...and so were chinese phones.
Nice, I hope Espressif took necessary measures for the coming Cyber Resilience Act in Europe. Especially regarding the AEC Core, Encrypted Flash and Secure Boot vulnerabilities which are still not fixed !
Espressif adding 5GHz wifi support, while raspberry pico 2 is still using micro usb... Its like those two kids - one plays with lego technic, other paints glue with hammer. ESPs are little revolution with their hardware, i love them.
I would not be holding my breath for Arduino support for this for a long time. The Arduino support is on version esp-idf 5.1 and the Espressif is on 5.3. The support for the C5 would likely come in 5.4. Unless they back port the C5 support to 5.1. It does not affect me much as I am only using esp chips these days so I spent the time to use the idf, and once you get used to it, other than the annoying changes to the drivers in the 5.3, it's amazingly stable and very easy to use
@johannobermeier4730 where is this? I just looked the c5 is not even supported in 5.4 beta, they said it won't be in until 5.5. I was not aware the esp32 Arduino supports anything beyond 5.1.
If so, your life is quite tricky. Most of my devices do not come with open-source code ;-) My slightest problem in this respect is such a small chip. Much bigger security issues are my iPhone or my car.
Range and power consumption are usually pretty important factors I would say. A chip with worse performance in both areas seems very niche. Probably a decent choice if you need high bandwidth (either audio, photo or video), in which case you are going to be connected to mains anyways so the consumption doesn't matter.
Why do you think that? I find it pretty useful for small projects. I especially like the fast development cycle. Code-test-code-test-etc. Its so much faster than recompiling Arduino or ESPHOME.
my yesterday arrived sampels have covers on the chips and a built in test program lighting the LED & scanning the networks of 2.4 and 5GHz I (1523) wifi:mode : sta (60:55:f9:fb:cf:88) I (1527) wifi:enable tsf W (1529) wifi:(BB)enable busy check(0x18), disable idle check(0xaa) [1B][5nI (2050) ESP32-C5_Iperf: configure led strip success! I (2050) button: IoT Button Version: 3.2.0 I (2050) gpio: GPIO[28]| InputEn: 1| OutputEn: 0| OpenDrain: 0| Pullup: 1| Pulldown: 0| Intr:0 ========================================================== | ESP32-C5 board simple test | | | | 1. Press BOOT button to check LED | | 2. Long press BOOT button to start full channel scan | | | ========================================================== I (2094) main_task: Returned from app_main() I (71526) ESP32-C5_Iperf: LED State: 1 I (82556) ESP32-C5_Iperf: LED State: 2 I (84466) ESP32-C5_Iperf: LED State: 3 I (86171) ESP32-C5_Iperf: LED State: 4 I (88266) ESP32-C5_Iperf: LED State: 0 I (107661) ESP32-C5_Iperf: Starting full-channel scan... I (107661) ESP32-C5_Iperf: It will take few more seconds to complete the scan, please wait I (107673) WIFI: DONE.STA_SCAN_START,OK. I (117067) WIFI: +SCAN:[b0:7f:...][MYhome24][rssi=-76] I (117100) WIFI: +SCAN:[b0:7f:...][MYhome50][rssi=-77] others deleted for privacy
@@AndreasSpiess vom schnellen Ali (ESP32-C5-DevKitC-1 Development Board with Dual-Band WiFi6 ESP32-C5-WROOM-1 Module) , W Official Store Periodisch schauen, ob wieder samoles verfügbar sind
@AndreasSpiess Oh, sorry, i'm a teenager. 😄 I wanted to say that there is no way that Espressif finally announced the C5, after all those years teasing us with it. I wish you a nice day!
what's the point of using the 5 GHz band (optimal for high bandwidth with lower range) on a microcontroller that is limited in bandwidth to begin with? this doesn't make sense to me
@@AndreasSpiess if the goal is to spread out the frequencies there's 433 MHz and more unlicensed ones... to me it's mostly a marketing stunt more than something practical to look forward to
@AndreasSpiess Hallo Andreas, leider hat Conrad vor ein paar Jahren seine Filiale in Graz aufgelöst. Geblieben sind nur kleine Läden mit bescheidenem Sortiment.
@@imbalos just out of curiosity, do you watch the video dubbed or did you ever listen to it? Its just terrible sounding and it will never be able to translate the emotions a human voice has. If you don't speak English, watch a few videos with subs and you will learn verry quick. Thats a win win, unlike robotic dubbing which is loose loose. But yeah, you are right, I am selfish cause I like hear the Swiss accent of the guy with the Swiss accent
As long as the guy with the Swiss accent keeps making videos, the Earth will continue to turn.
:-))
Hey, you ready my mind.
😇
Agree,
@AndreasSpiess, ar 3:12 you seem to be using full ESP32 devkits. They were notorious for high power usage due to very crappy USB-serial bridges. The bare "canned" submodule is much more energy efficient, suitable for battery use.
@@PawelKraszewski I mentioned that the module alone took 70mA.
All the hackers and network testers will be happy to see the 5ghz channel.
While the rest of us will be happy to leave the crowded 2.4ghz network.
What it can act as a bridge? Way cool.
all the other model can do it with just a single radio, now it can do 2.4 to 5g bridge hopefully, well have to wait for the esp32 nat router to update, hopefully the speed is better
I do not know if it can act as a bridge. Maybe for some low-speed traffic...
@@AndreasSpiess Oh ok thanks anyway.
Don't be so excited, 5GHz has shorter reach... 2.4 is really great in that regard, and i wonder if ESP can even saturate 5GHz bandwith... But it is nice addition for in home behind wall or two devices for sure.
i hope the repeater can have faster speed for 5g
Thank you for this preview, very interesting!
You are welcome! I was glad I got one of their samples…
I'm just designing my first full "production level" PCB with an ESP32 right at this moment. Thank so very much, Andreas! I had no f*ing idea that an old software guy (25y in software) could learn proper hardware.
PCBAs "fabs" already have the C5 modules, btw... It's epic we can develop stuff in near real time like this...
Thanks again :)
Welcome to the dark side, we make cookies! ;-)
The HW guys also have to learn SW. "Balancing justice," as we say in German ;-)
@neilcherry6452 , cookies are not stale, Chocolate Chip
I also am designing my first full production level PCB with an ESP32 right at this moment, also 25y in the IT industry. Started at AOL tech support in 1997. "Welcome! You've got mail!" 🤣
which fabs already have C5 modules available?
Thanking you most kindly from English England
You are welcome!
Espressif naming at it again
Who names chips consistently? Watch the next one be esp32-c5 v2 lol
They know that their customers are intelligent people ;-)
Now we need ESP32-C4
I only have a P4...
Explosive!
Interesting new chip on the block 👌
@ Wow
What can be expected in the C4 ?
You now almost have half a million subscribers!
Just think of this ..... What football stadium could Carry 492.000 People?
Yes. It is very strange also for me ;-)
Impressive piece of hardware. Indeed, the video was interesting and useful. As I mentioned before... awesome Sunday morning infotainment!
Thank you! Have a good rest of Sunday.
Thank you for sharing all the (technical) information! Great video!
My pleasure!
My favorite guy with swiss accent is back!
I thought I was always here ;-)
Thanks for sharing! I need to grab one of those. Hope all is well!
I would hope so. Espressif's quality was ok in the past and I hope they did the testing...
I currently like the C3 modules the most. I'm curious to see what the C5 will be like. Thanks for your information
You are welcome!
Andreas, those Aqara motion sensors. I also have 2 of those. Working every single day in the living- and diningroom reporting movement and the Lux in the area. I have never replaced a battery in them. Just looked them up ... I received them on 9 feb 2021 so that is 4 years of working non stop now. Almost unbelievable. Makes me think on how much energy is being thrown away on some other products.
Oww and the 5GHz, was just looking yesterday if nothing changed after ordering ESP32's about 3 years ago and was dissapointed in them not having 5GHz. So now we wait for stock.
Good to know that I do not have to change the batteries for another few years ;-)
espnow on 5.8ghz would be amazing!
I hope it is implemented in software and can be ported...
You can use it out of the box. If only esp-now had proper authentication. As it stands, it's gaping wide open for denial of service.
Thanks!
Welcome!
At last the dual band on expressif 👍 I wish they did not abandonned to Ethernet PHY and would have brought a 10Mb/s MAC as well... This would make a great WCH alternative and a MCU multiknife 🎉 Meanwhile we have to choose between wifi and ethernet on RISC V 🥴
Having ethernet and WiFi in the same project is probably not a typical scenario. At least here, I usually decide which connection I need and then decide on the chip. The SW interfaces are very similar.
@AndreasSpiess Well having both means you can design either redundant ethernet or use the radio for non wifi scenarii for bridge/edge deployment and keep the core full Ethernet+IP. Plus it means you use only one chip/design for all your customer deploymen choices. Here for building IoT if it is WiFi people might choose Espressif for good reasons, but if WiFi is not acceptable for usual security reason then you will have to move to WCH or others ... Or plan to have a board design that accept boths. This adds costs to the bottom line. I would have thought they would have brought a 10base T1S compatible chip, the first MCU with a PHY/MAC on board for it. Definitivelly a killer for automotive or building IoT if they keep the same price point... Thanks for your great videos 👍
@@testman9541 what's the problem with using W5500 or similar SPI Ethernet chips together with C5?
@@testman9541 The standard ESP32 is still actively supported, and the P4 also has RMII. ESP-IDF does now have support for 1 RMII phy for 10Base-T1S also. I do agree it'd be nice to have seen it on more of their chips, however its quite clear the C series in particular is specifically for wireless applications.
@callumkingunderwood Nice that T1S is there in idf tnx 👍but unlike WCH there have no phy bundled which means increasing the BOM 🥴 which also means that for T1S you still have to bring a pricey T1S phy 😭 Look like the ESP32 original is most becoming a "legacy" as none outside P4 of the other offspring have brought any wired ethernet ... And none have PHY. Odd.
ITS FINALLY HAPPENING YESS
Amazing. I've always wondered why so few radios included a 5Ghz radio. Sort of assumed it was some process or FET/silicon technology limitation.
Now if they just made a 100 pin package version, we could use it for literally everything.
Then it probably would be too expensive for most applications not needing such a big case...
@@AndreasSpiess Would it? I always wonder about this. Adding more GPIO logic and pad drivers would be only a small amount of silicon, I would image.
But maybe adding just the area to bond out 30+ more GPIO's might take a tone of area and make it totally uneconomical.
Same for the actual packaging, too.
But I don't know the economics of it.
Still - a high-gpio ESP32-* would be pretty useful.
The component @2:48 looks more like a diplexer for the 2.4 and 5GHz ranges. It's a common way to multiplex both bands to the same RF path.
Well possible. A guy from Espressif mentioned the word balun. But I did not investigate.
Paces & holds breath for the C5 Supermini :P
I hope they find enough space for the two antennas on these small formats.
If both radios can run at once, this would conceivably allow one to light up a BT to WiFi gateway/proxy device (similar to ESPhome BT proxies) but with much better performance. The 5.8GHz radio can stay in touch with the network while 2.4 is open to receive BT traffic.
I would be astonished if both radios would run at the same time. But maybe they found a way to keep connections on both bands in parallel.
Thanks, 👍🏼🇧🇷
You're welcome! 😊
I got two sample devkits (with metal case) 3 weeks ago and have been playing with them since. My projects involves 8 channel audio 24/44 over UDP - which works nicely in the 5 GHz band with 11ax 😁 I measured an iperf throughput of about 62 MBit/s with a UDP payload of 1440 bytes and an average UDP packet latency of 540 +/- 180 μs (yeah, jitter). Not too bad for an engineering sample, huh?
Cool. Thanks for the info!
Cool preview 🎉.
Thank you!
Cool. Thx
My pleasure!
Wow, it is exciting to see a RISC-V microcontroller that supports both 2.4 and 5 GHz dual-band Wi-Fi 6! ESP32-C5 looks very promising. I hope it will be as affordable as ESP32-C3 or ESP32-C6. Thank you for the video! Btw do you plan to visit FOSDEM 2025?
Unfortunately I have a family obligation. So this time I will not be in Brussels
@AndreasSpiess no worries, see you next time!
And the ESP32-C6 and H2 support Zigbee too
You are right.
Tkm Andreas
My pleasure!
Can't wait for the version with a u.fl connector, and/or a version that is 5.8GHz only
We will see if it makes sense for them to remove 2.4GHz. Maybe the cost difference is not big.
Hello guy with a Swiss accent) It's me, a cat with a cat accent 🐱
:-))
No.. no.. The cat has an Austrian accent :)
Not sure if you have, but the esp-idf framework is pretty easy to setup. You can see the examples and roll your own.
I never tried. I like the Arduino IDE because I can also use non-Espressif chips. But for Espressif chips it is the way to go.
5.8GHz is fine if you want highspeed over a shorter range, but if the ESP32 can't or does not need the highspeed data rates then 2.4GHz will be just fine. Which is why if you want lower power or greater distances you drop back to lower frequency's or much slower data rates and hence narrower bandwidths.
I agree. In addition, it depends on the environment. If you live in a congested area, maybe 5.8GHz is also needed.
@@AndreasSpiess In my mum's house the 2.4GHz only just about gets out of the room. i would not expect 5.8GHz to get out of the room at all.
we had to put a wifi over mains extender to get a good signal in the kitchen which has only one wall between it and the router.
One good thing is it's very electrically quiet and your mobile don't ring much. 🙂
Can't the power usage be lowered by disabling parts of the chip or lowering clock frequency, as you can with an Atmel based board?
For sure. They have this low-power core. The question is which functionality you lose with the disabling.
You can lower the cpu frequency to reduce power in the ESP32
@@G6EJD Yes. But it does not help to reduce mA to microA
@@AndreasSpiess indeed, but every little helps!
@@G6EJD Needs to be more than 'a little' to move the needle from mains to button cell...
very nice !
Thank you!
Thank you for evaluating the 5.8 GHz ESP32. Sad, that it is so power hungry. What I am really missing in my home automation is a low power (e.g. zigbee) epaper display unit running on batteries. BTW: I converted all my aqara motion sensors to AA. They are running for years and I have not to touch (and adjust) the sensors when replacing the batteries.
Interesting idea! I only have a handful of PIR sensors. So I prefer the small form factor and easy mount.
These things are typically power hungry because they aren't going to sleep. You probably won't do it on a dev board but deep sleep on a c6 is meant to be 10uA which is a little high (smaller mcus get down around 3) but should still last a year on some AAA cells.
Then it wakes up, pulls the power for a few milliseconds and goes back to sleep. The difference with wifi and ZigBee is the setup time, wifi is often seconds, ZigBee doesn't have one, just wake up and blast your packet then go back to sleep. There is very little that you can do if you want to Rx signals in something like real time that remains low power. There are some wifi modes that come close but that's more solar power will keep it alive than pure battery will last for months.
@@AndreasSpiess My PIRs are hidden on furnitures or similar objects. So, I can also hide the batteries on or in these furnitures. Some of them are placed quite deep and upside down.
I have them in every room and I trigger all the Ikea zigbee ceiling light panels with them - via ioBroker.
@@zyeborm Thank you, I started home automation in 2011 using the Homematic system. Those units are using 868MHz and draw little current during sleeping or listening. During communication they are using 20mA up to 30mA for one or two seconds. They also have a very good battery life.
Yayy
I guess its nice to have a 5Ghz option. But would have preferred a 1.2Ghz Wifi when it comes IOTs. (no such thing I know).
For IOTs I'm ALWAYS in need of more range and never more bandwidth.
Maybe you have a look at Halow (Sub-GHz WiFi, I made a video about it)
Very cool!
Indeed! Long awaited.
If you want to measure the power consumption properly, you need to disconnect the jumper and power the MCU directly. This will avoid measuring consumption of USB-UART adapter and on-board LDO.
You are right.
The biggest problem with the ESP32 is the lack of good quality analogue peripherals like ADCs, DACs and OpAmps, not the lack of wireless capabilities.
I assume this depends on the application. Not many of my projects use an ADC for anything other than measuring battery voltage.
@@AndreasSpiess I use multiple ADCs in practically all of mine. Monitoring and/or controlling a solar panel or wind gen system, monitoring and/or controlling charge systems or inverter systems as examples. Monitoring home energy use.
The STM32 series have a wonderful array of analogue peripherals, but lack WiFi.
The ESP has very nice WiFi, but horrible analogue.
It's a real pity to have to cobble two devices together when one should really do.
It would be really useful if I had a Meshtastic node which connected to the internet for mqtt, but was still accessible over Bluetooth for configuration - this might just do that (although the power consumption needs work!)
It does not have LoRa. So nothing changes for Meshtastic.
@AndreasSpiess oh absolutely, but there are a few esp based meshtastisc nodes, I'm hoping they develop from this one and add an 868 transceiver
a esp32 with more io would be nice to be able to use all peripherals at once
The P4 has more pins but no radio. I assume they go for the mass market to keep their prices down.
This is such a tease...... currently nobody has samples available either, usual suspects like Mouser or DigiKey seem to have none (or none yet).
You are right.
This is very cool and a long time coming, as you pointed out! But I don't understand the mention of "5.8" GHz, is it specific to a particular region? 802.11a was defined all the way back in 1999, and most bands are closer to 5GHz than 5.8GHz. What's so specific about 5.8GHz here? In the original bands (U-NII-1, U-NII-2/2e, U-NII-3) only channel 161 is over 5.8GHz. This makes me wonder if if will support the common bands used indoors (5.15-5.25) or if this chip is actually limited to some very specific channels. Channel 161 at 5.805 GHz is usually more recommended for long-range outdoors use, which isn't particularly where I use my Espressif chips to be honest. Even in newer standards 5.8GHz still only means channels 149-161 so this feels weirdly limited.
You are right about the frequencies. They only differ a bit between regions. I could have used 5GHz, but many people confuse it with 5G cellular technology. In Amateur Radio, our Band is called 5.8GHz. This is why I used it here.
But after your comment, I changed the title to 5GHz.
Oh yes, it means now I can even deauth devices from 5ghz wifi band from my pocket. 😂 it's gonna be fun
I think so.
OMGGGG I've been waiting for this chip for soooo long. I can't wait to build my own PCB with it
How did you get this sample??
I got it from Espressif. I hope you plan to use a module, not only the chip for your PCB. Because 5.8GHz is a high frequency...
@AndreasSpiess Interesting... Why is using the chip a bad idea?? I've been watching some little chip antennas with dual bands for a while... Waiting for this exact moment... And yes, I want to use only the chip
Why you don't recommend this?? I know it is high frequency but I already built a lot in 2.4GHz 🤔
@@crisdores If you have the knowledge on transmission lines and the instruments to check if your design is ok, then you can forget my comment of the course.
I'm working at a smart home company and we wanted to use the ESP32-H2 with Matter over Thead. We decided against it because of the high current consumption. I think it is even too high for a mains powered device. At least for some regulations or something in Germany. (I'm just a software guy, the hardware guys know better)
Thank you for sharing!
Lovely, byyee
Have a nice day!
thx, but havent you got any announcement when to expect the product to arrive on the market ?
3 years from first video to know was a quite long time and I had hope to hear something like available from eastern 2025
Three years ago, the Chip was not from Espressif…
I assume the Chip will be available in a few months
hello thank you for your videos ! i've a question - My project need to connect an arduino micro + 1 multiplexer to 32 potentiometers to make a midi controller - How do you do for a good cables connection management ? - i mean 3 cables start from each pots + each pots need to be link each other with a cable + each pots need to be link to the arduino - 🙃so it is crazy !!! a pcb will be great but it's difficult for me 😄 so
I would create a PCB and check if you need 2 or 4 layers. Both are not terribly expensive if the board is not too big. Or you can use more than 1 multiplexer close to the potentiometers even if you do not need all pins. I2C lines could be easier to route.
@@AndreasSpiess agree with you, more than 1 multiplexer is a good idea ! - thank you fir your reply !
hello! does the core count matters? yes this support 5ghz but C-series runs single core😔
wow and imsai guy youtube channel amazing for me sometimes
I like it too
So now we can make a 5GHz wifi deauther?
Indeed... Won't be long before the bin is released...
So does this mean that ESPHome could receive Zigbee support that would enable us to create Zigbee smart devices? I'd love to have them as extenders..
I never saw the extender software for Espressif chips. The HW should be capable to do the task.
With 2 antennas if the WiFi is on 5GHz does that mean it can also run Zigbee etc. on the 2.4GHz?
Yes. Zigbee uses the 2.4GHz radio and antenna
Do the ESP32-C5 and C6, with their HP and LP cores, support SMP in FreeRTOS by utilizing the LP core as a second real processor? If not, does multitasking still improve overall performance or speed? This would be particularly useful for a use case where a sensor is being read while the data is simultaneously transmitted via wireless communication in real time, with minimal delay (e.g., millisecond-level).
I never looked at the LP core on these chips. Only at the LP core of the ESP32. There, it had very limited functionality and had to be programmed in assembler. So most probably no SMP
If It can work with 5,8 GHz could It be able to transmit and recieve vtx signals? If so It would be very useful for DIY fpv googles
I do not know :-(
bout time
I have already 150+ 2.4 GHz devices in my house - time to move them to 5GHz - just waiting for C5 to surface one day ;-) Wondering if ESPnow will also work on 5GHz
150: That is a lot! Concerning ESP-Now: I do not know. I hope it is only software that can be converted to use the 5.8GHz PHY
@@AndreasSpiess it is a lot, of course ;-) I had to dedicate 2 APs for all my IoT devices and not many APs can suppor that many devices
I think C6 will not be replaced as there is C61 too.
A good point!
I watched Great Scott's video earlier today concerning ESP32 and Zigbee. Since I'm not familiar with Zigbee yet, I may be wrong about this, but I thought he found the current draw to be minuscule. Was he just measuring the RF draw of an existing commercial device (he had a few), or did I misinterpret his testing?
You are right. Zigbee devices usually consume very little power. That is the reason for my critic
He was measuring the total current consumption on a commercial device. Not necessarily c6, he didn't address what chip it was in the video. These modules may be capable of lower power operation with some optimisation.
@@andrewbergspage Thanks!
@@AndreasSpiess 👍
@@andrewbergspage I measured the module alone. So do not hope too much.
An ESP32 thread border router seems like a possibility perhaps...?
Maybe...
Missing some info about nrf7002 ...
Is it Arduino IDE-compatible? Or do you already get cheap modules or dev boards? Then it would be interesting for our community.
Well the C5 i still not available :(
I would like to know where they got the antenna design from.
As mentioned, I got an engineering sample. I assume they have to produce now for the mass market...
Hi
I would like to request to make a helmet intercom system that can provide a minimum coverage distance of 500 meters. The system should ensure clear and reliable communication within this range.
That is a good idea.
Just out of curiosity. How much control do you get of the 5.8 GHz radio. Woold it be possible to use as a vtx?
I do not know :-(
What is that naming scheme from espressif? Why is the C5 newer than the C6? Quite a Deutsche Bahn ICE3 Neo move..
I guess the 6 in ESP32-C6 refers to WiFi 6, and the 5 in ESP32-C5 refers to 5 GHz.
It looks to be sequential
The design turns to release could differ
Probably took a bit more time to add the 5.8GHz radio to the c5
The c6 is only 2.4GHz
Both have wifi6
I don't really get the point of 5GHz wifi in microcontrollers. They don't benefit from the extra bandwidth, and it eats more power than the 2.4GHz band. The only advantage would be in areas where the 2.4 is very congested but the 5.8 is still mostly clean. But since it's all about having options, I don't mind it being added - as long as it doesn't cause extra burdens when not in use.
Congested areas are for sure a big thing. Power consumption in my tests was similar to 2.4GHz. And remember: Bill Gates once thought that 640kB RAM would be enough for everybody ;-)
Heeeeeey! Best person to hear this news from! 🎉
:-)
Thanks for info! 5Ghz stack supports esp-now?
I do not know :-(
Esp-now uses the tcp/ip stack so why would t it support their now protocol plus it’s only a protocol!
Will ESP Now work over 5GHz?
I have no information
Could esp-now work on 2.4 simultaneously with wifi on 5Ghz?
I do not know :-(
Where to buy this development board?
I got it from Espressif
I don't know why but this thought is coming to my mind..all these years this chip was collecting data for DeepSeek 😞 Thats why no one else could make a wifi chip so cheap...and so were chinese phones.
I get this product from your URL
I would be very interested in an ESP32 without any form of radio.
The P4 will have no radio
@@AndreasSpiess That sounds good.
Hi I'm in English England
What about p4?
Maybe in a future video. So far, I do not have a lot of examples to show :-(
Nice, I hope Espressif took necessary measures for the coming Cyber Resilience Act in Europe. Especially regarding the AEC Core, Encrypted Flash and Secure Boot vulnerabilities which are still not fixed !
I do not understand too much about security. But I am not sure if these devices are that critical. Many of us put them in their own VLAN.
@@AndreasSpiessmany of us yes. but not so many of the users of commercial IOT devices embedding these chips.
I guess it’s too much to ask for CANBUS support on a wireless oriented MCU.
It has, but it is called TWAI.
Espressif adding 5GHz wifi support, while raspberry pico 2 is still using micro usb... Its like those two kids - one plays with lego technic, other paints glue with hammer. ESPs are little revolution with their hardware, i love them.
Pi 5 is usb c with power delivery
has pcie so you can connect and nvme drive .... Not to mention the pi had 5Ghz for many years already
@@rj7855 raspberry pico... you really try to compare esp32 to raspberry pi 5?
Now if only ESPs had PIOs. :-)
Does the wifi still interfere with the onboard ADC?
I do not know.
I would not be holding my breath for Arduino support for this for a long time. The Arduino support is on version esp-idf 5.1 and the Espressif is on 5.3. The support for the C5 would likely come in 5.4. Unless they back port the C5 support to 5.1. It does not affect me much as I am only using esp chips these days so I spent the time to use the idf, and once you get used to it, other than the annoying changes to the drivers in the 5.3, it's amazingly stable and very easy to use
Well, the early working Arduino version for the C5 is already done. The problem is more to get the hardware ;-)
@johannobermeier4730 where is this? I just looked the c5 is not even supported in 5.4 beta, they said it won't be in until 5.5. I was not aware the esp32 Arduino supports anything beyond 5.1.
We should shortly get a "preview". Whatever this will be. We also have to wait for the chips...
I really have a hard time trusting binary closed source code
If so, your life is quite tricky. Most of my devices do not come with open-source code ;-) My slightest problem in this respect is such a small chip. Much bigger security issues are my iPhone or my car.
AINT NO WAY
??
Range and power consumption are usually pretty important factors I would say. A chip with worse performance in both areas seems very niche.
Probably a decent choice if you need high bandwidth (either audio, photo or video), in which case you are going to be connected to mains anyways so the consumption doesn't matter.
I agree with power and range. We will see how important the 5.8GHz feature will become, also as a marketing argument.
And four years later, we’ll get MicroPython support
I assume it will come fast. It seems there is not a significant change on the software side...
@@AndreasSpiess Woohoo. I'm building a product based on the ESP32 and this will be a nice upgrade in later versions.
Mp is pretty Useless
Why do you think that? I find it pretty useful for small projects. I especially like the fast development cycle. Code-test-code-test-etc. Its so much faster than recompiling Arduino or ESPHOME.
It's so useless I'm 2-3 months from releasing some IoT products based on it. Totally useless.
my yesterday arrived sampels have covers on the chips and a built in test program lighting the LED & scanning the networks of 2.4 and 5GHz
I (1523) wifi:mode : sta (60:55:f9:fb:cf:88)
I (1527) wifi:enable tsf
W (1529) wifi:(BB)enable busy check(0x18), disable idle check(0xaa)
[1B][5nI (2050) ESP32-C5_Iperf: configure led strip success!
I (2050) button: IoT Button Version: 3.2.0
I (2050) gpio: GPIO[28]| InputEn: 1| OutputEn: 0| OpenDrain: 0| Pullup: 1| Pulldown: 0| Intr:0
==========================================================
| ESP32-C5 board simple test |
| |
| 1. Press BOOT button to check LED |
| 2. Long press BOOT button to start full channel scan |
| |
==========================================================
I (2094) main_task: Returned from app_main()
I (71526) ESP32-C5_Iperf: LED State: 1
I (82556) ESP32-C5_Iperf: LED State: 2
I (84466) ESP32-C5_Iperf: LED State: 3
I (86171) ESP32-C5_Iperf: LED State: 4
I (88266) ESP32-C5_Iperf: LED State: 0
I (107661) ESP32-C5_Iperf: Starting full-channel scan...
I (107661) ESP32-C5_Iperf: It will take few more seconds to complete the scan, please wait
I (107673) WIFI: DONE.STA_SCAN_START,OK.
I (117067) WIFI: +SCAN:[b0:7f:...][MYhome24][rssi=-76]
I (117100) WIFI: +SCAN:[b0:7f:...][MYhome50][rssi=-77]
others deleted for privacy
Cool! Where did you get them from?
@@AndreasSpiess vom schnellen ali (W Official Store) du musst periodisch schauen, ob wieder samples vorhanden sind ...
@@AndreasSpiess vom schnellen Ali (ESP32-C5-DevKitC-1 Development Board with Dual-Band WiFi6 ESP32-C5-WROOM-1 Module) , W Official Store
Periodisch schauen, ob wieder samoles verfügbar sind
no way they actually spit it out☠
I do not understand :-(
@AndreasSpiess Oh, sorry, i'm a teenager. 😄 I wanted to say that there is no way that Espressif finally announced the C5, after all those years teasing us with it. I wish you a nice day!
Is this the product
!!!?
what's the point of using the 5 GHz band (optimal for high bandwidth with lower range) on a microcontroller that is limited in bandwidth to begin with?
this doesn't make sense to me
In some areas, 2.4GHz is pretty crowded. Plus it is probably a sales argument...
@@AndreasSpiess if the goal is to spread out the frequencies there's 433 MHz and more unlicensed ones...
to me it's mostly a marketing stunt more than something practical to look forward to
th-cam.com/video/niqtYxXy6KQ/w-d-xo.htmlsi=9tXYHHRFxrVOgTBK
Maybe somebody figured out that 2,4 g wifi sucks ass in the real world
So far I have no big problems. But I live in a non-congested area.
Das Dumme ist nur, dass man diese Elektronik nicht mehr einfach in Elektronikläden kaufen kann und bestellen muss.
Gibt es bei euch noch Elektronikläden? Da habt ihr Glück!
@AndreasSpiess Hallo Andreas, leider hat Conrad vor ein paar Jahren seine Filiale in Graz aufgelöst. Geblieben sind nur kleine Läden mit bescheidenem Sortiment.
Andreas, can you fix your twitter/x contact information across your platforms. Thanks
I'm always so immensely confused with all the names... cause why is the C5 newer than the C6 with more features? 🥲🥲🥲
Maybe because of the 5GHz?
maybe they planned to be finished with the C5 sooner, but the C6-team were better and suprised everyone
Please please please turn off that TH-cam autodubbing nonsense. It destroys your USP, the Swiss accent, and makes your videos unwatchable
How does an optional feature make his videos unwatchable?
@imbalos cause its not optional on 3rd party yt clients
@@patrikdavid8597 sound kinda selfish.
You have to switch to English. TH-cam added this Feature for everybody not using English Language clients
@@imbalos just out of curiosity, do you watch the video dubbed or did you ever listen to it? Its just terrible sounding and it will never be able to translate the emotions a human voice has. If you don't speak English, watch a few videos with subs and you will learn verry quick. Thats a win win, unlike robotic dubbing which is loose loose. But yeah, you are right, I am selfish cause I like hear the Swiss accent of the guy with the Swiss accent