Exactly. He didn't seem unhealthy from this video. Maybe a bit slow but that's common with aging. Really surprised to see him dead after watching him on this podcast.
Less than a month later, RIP Dan Dennett (19 April, 2024). How sharp his mind still was, and how healthy he seemed, so near the end. I hope he didn't suffer in the weeks following this panel. It was probably one of the last public appearances he did. What a great illusory consciousness, evaporating into.. this.. space. And then there were two.
Nothing better than getting great minds who disagree into the same room to hear each other's points and discuss, rather than having to listen to one interview at a time and wonder what each would say to the other if they were present. Tremendously useful discussion. Thank you all!
Three of my favorite thinkers of all time. You’ve had so many great guests but you’ve really outdone yourself this time. Please keep these wonderful conversations going. Also, you’ve improved as a host, asking the right questions and comments. Bravo 👏
I guess they are great thinkers, but not when it comes to the subjects in the title, namely spirituality, Parapsychology, Panpsychism and even Physics Violation. The last one because the Physics is about the fundamental laws of the physical (materialistic) world that don't change and are obeyed by abstract entities that we (physicists) abstracted in nature, like mass, energy, work, heat, velocity etc etc. So basically they don't think, or think in a wrong way when it comes to these questions.
@@isitme1234yes we physicists. We meet on the third Saturday of every month to discuss matters of the physical, solve equations and such. If you'd like to attend you must email in advance. Everyone is going to wear Hawaiian shirts this meeting. Oh and bring a covered dish.
@@usefmary1227 despite the fact that his claim on the unlikeliness of psychic phenomena was based on a pretty clear logical fallacy but I don't see you two FANS noticing ahahahah. Well I did *pats self on back*. I even wrote a comment about it which clearly demonstrates the fallacy. My work here is done
@@radscorpion8When you wrote that comment (which I responded to) had you actually listened to that discussion section of the podcast, or just reported your first knee-jerk reaction to the edit in the intro? It really seems like the latter.
what a great line up, happy geeseling right here. as regards your 200th show - congrats dude, you really are doing a great job and we appreciate it enormously.
Congratulations Robinson, 200 episodes very cool, you consistently have great people to engage with and that benefits all of us, fantastic panel for number 200, thank you Daniel, Sean, Steven, and Robinson for sharing your time and work, 20 years ago you'd have to spend a week deep in a library to begin to gather the information presented here and its greatly appreciated, peace
Wow I just watched this again, and I have to say I think I learn more listening to these guys discuss then any other podcast I've seen in a long time… You're really good at this Robinson, not only adding to the discussion but prompting deeper and further insights from these great minds… Kudos!
Very apt selection of guests whose expertise overlap and differentiate in productive and enlightening ways, especially when talking about teleology, with Sean, then Dan, then Steve piggybacking on each other and expanding the discussion.
For some reason this was playing on my cell phone at times two speed when I woke up. My brain had been translated this into a dream where I was at a preppy frat party that doubled as an in processing station for drawing military gear for a deployment. I was going from station to station and had to wait in various lines to either play beer games or draw more T-50 (military gear). While in each line I was discussing all these super deep philosophical issues with people. When I woke up I immediately realized that I am not as smart as my dream made me think I am, but it did clarify how my interpretation of the world is really messed up.
So glad we got to listen to Mr.Dennett! Such a great philosopher! at one point (around 1:25:00) Dennett is talking about degrees of things and not absolutes or definite lines between certain things. I think it’s logically almost impossible to avoid answering a question about a “first instance” of any appearance. For example, there had to be a first moment when something was alive rather than not alive and same with consciousness. The other possibility is that these things are just not emergent and rather constantly evolving characteristics of things.
26:16 Exactly .. this is my concern right now as well. Aside from those drudgery jobs, AI is supposed to solve the climate crisis and cancer, not ruin art, culture and music
From a retired academic (me): academic research is largely based on competitive grants. It's inevitable that people competing for grants will turn ot AI machinery to crank out applications. Up till now we had to sweat to put together proposals that fit the different requirements of each grant. With AI anyone will be able to apply to every single grant available, in different foreign languages to boot. Has academia discussed this prospect? Or are you all still stuck on figuring out how to prevent students from cheating on their papers?
We missed a greatest philosopher/thinker in 21 century, Dan you are always alife in our heart ” its real but not what you think its” you are a therapiest of philosophy/linguistic!
I think the problem with "illusion" applying to consciousness or free will is that the word carries a "fake" connotation. Something that isn't what you think it is, is not fake or unreal.
if we take free will by word than the answer is clearly no. sorry human beings are wrong in many aspects. and they are less smart than they think. They should be waked up from their philosophical dreams. Can a person who can neither speak Chinese, nor master HTML, nor is a grandmaster at chess, nor can prove that the square root of two is not a rational number, nor understands the processes in the sun, be compared to AGI at all? LLM outprfom most humans in many aspects.
@@CJ-cd5cd Consciousness as part of a model being computed by the brain is actually kinda dualistic, but not in the same way it has traditionally been characterized in philosophical circles.
As someone both developing artificial intelligences and interested in what their observed phenomena teach us about intelligence in general, it’s great to see such a nuanced discussion. Thanks Robinson, and congratulations on the big 2 zero zero.
I'm not buying it from Steven when he says at around 24:50 that there are very few signs of technologically driven unemployment. I am an Uber Driver, a Doordash driver, and Amazon driver, and all of these delivery platforms are run by artificial intelligence and algorithms. I don't have a real person for a boss, I have a counterfeit person who never speaks to me or let's me know he even exists. He solely controls how much money I earn, what work I can possibly do, the extent to which I am able to earn money. I was hired by a fake person and I can be fired by a fake person. Or "deactivated" for the technical lingo. There is a term in economics called "algorithmic wage discrimination," and it's pretty much exactly like the way a reasonable might expect it to be based on the name of the phenomenon. What countermeasures are in place to prevent this? The government generally seems concerned with only whether or not workers like myself are classified as independent contractors or as employees, and not concerned with this. Yeah it's true that while you know, pizza places and other restaurants have largely fired all of their delivery drivers in favor of AI based delivery, and I get a job because of it, but I'm probably making about the same amount of money as those employed workers made, and I don't get the rights that are guaranteed to employees because I'm legally a contractor. And Uber/Lyft rides etc are also based on an AI/algorithm model. They've displaced some vast number of taxicab workers and companies. Is this a good trade off? I'm not so sure it is. I think Dan Dennett's concerns are very well-founded.
Just a little over 25 years ago, no physicist could have dreamed of dark energy. Now most believe it's the most abundant form of energy in the universe. Given that history, it's amazing physicists like Sean Carroll so blithely dismiss other possible forms of energy that might be mediating "metaphysical" phenomena.
It is odd, isn't it. Stuff like this makes you realise that scientists are just humans, and I think all people would benefit from realising that. The rise of scientism is quite disturbing, where scientists are treated as a kind of priest class that are gatekeepers of truth.
He’s explained this before on Mindscape. We have complete theories at most energy scales. The frontier of physics is dealing in extreme energies such that any new findings will have zero effect on physics at our scale. The door has effectively closed for parapsychology and such.
@@chemquests Yup, there's that signature hubris. You're in good company with Lord Kelvin who blundered "There's nothing new to be discovered in physics" back in 1900, lol.
@@keppela1 I didn’t say nothing new; I qualified it with “at the relevant energies”. You heard Sean explain that it would require photos for telekinesis to work; these are principled arguments that limit what’s possible. You’d first have to propose a physical mechanism before anyone entertains these ideas seriously, which is fair. Do you expect to blurt out anything at all and always be taken seriously?
@@chemquests The only thing I've "blurted out" are factual examples of how physicists have been proven spectacularly wrong before. Given that history, I think a little humility is in order.
I agree with Dennett. With AI truth becomes just a miniscule noise within a sea of nonsense. The countermeasure then is to not trust anything, and all comes to halt (at best).
On the first point about counterfeit humans i believe Daniel Dennett is spot on. I am grateful there are still people giving caution and saying we should slow down.
Nah I’m good on waiting, people deserve to be cured of all these diseases like aging. Slowing ai will hamper that. Everyone deserves an opportunity at immortality
I would like to issue a correction you said: "Sean Carroll ... the host of Mindscape which is the best philosophy and science show out there". but this is simply untrue because YOUR show is the best philosophy and science show out there! Mindscape is a close second though.
Hadn't watched Sean Carroll for a while, and I just realised that in my memory (e.g. the way I'd picture him when reading something of his) he had completely morphed into Pete Holmes, maybe with a hint of Paul Bloom, too.
To me, I think of how Daniel Dennett's free will and R. Sapolsky's free will may differ. Dennett will say that the skier is making decisions from within their mind to mitigate their destination as gravity pulls them down the slope compared to a rock that simply tumbles and is affected by external factors. But Sapolsky has a broader definition. He might say, "Why is the skier even at that slope? Why are they even a skier? What factors and influences led them to become a skier? What type of economics allowed them to afford good skis? What genetics allow them to be a good skier with good balance and athletic constitution? Would they even have been a skier if they'd had parents from Florida who adopted the skier when they were a baby?" Dennett seems to say a person is aware of the past and the present, and they are making choices themselves at the moment, but Sapolsky seems to say that a person is the end result of things they had no control over, simply reacting to an environment based on conditioning and past influence over their organism, and that they can do no more than to be as such.
49:00 Dennett makes a good point, albeit inadvertently, about our relationship to language in general. I’m thinking of how phenomena exist prior to the words we invent to describe them. I believe, we get lost in word meanings and conceptual constructs, when the original insight and context is forgotten. Basically, we’re limited in what we can discuss accurately. Nevertheless, I described this idea using words
I really enjoy your show! And even if I have disagreements with Dennett, Pinker and Carroll on the particular issue that this show confronts, I enjoyed this one, too. Having said this, why haven't you had Thomas Nagel (NYU) on your show? Of course, he believes that the mental is not reducible to the material. Thus, he poses a form of neutral monism that could possibly account for the mind, something that Nagel argues that a purely physicalist account cannot account for. Carroll threw his cards on the table, the physical laws of the universe -- mostly quantum laws -- are the only game in town. Nagel would disagree and pose a form of teleology that could plausibly account for the mind. I am sympathetic to Nagel's quest. At any rate, a show with Nagel would be great. Keep up the good work!
1:04:14 "Although the advanced potentials are entirely consistent with Maxwell’s equations, they violate the most sacred tenet in all of physics: the principle of causality. They suggest that the potentials now depend on what the charge and the current distribution will be at some time in the future-the effect, in other words, precedes the cause. Although the advanced potentials are of some theoretical interest, they have no direct physical significance." Section 10.2 continuous distributions "This is not an idle curiosity, for it rescues the notion of causality, on which all physics is based" Section 12.1 The special theory of Relativity These passages are from David Griffith textbook introduction to electrodynamics (Fourth edition). I mean I would not take Sean seriously when he said you will not find causality or cause and effect in physics textbooks (he did not say electrodynamics but that applies too) and for sure Griffith asserts that some laws have time symmetry (time reversal invariant) which aggress with what Sean said but still Griffith said that causality is the most important law! Sean just wanted to dismiss William Lane Craig ideas and other theists and therefore he said what he said but I do not think he holds that seriously.
27:45 I haven't disagreed with Steve on very many things but what he sais here is wrong. Creative industries are moving towards ai generated imagery. Shutterstock and sites like it are on track to be put out of business by AI created images. So in that context at least, people are definitely willing to pay less for AI images instead of pay more for images taken by a photographer or drawn by a human artist.
What makes Sean think that psychic powers are mediated through particles? It might be through entanglement. And how does Sean account for brain waves corresponding to organized thought, what accounts for the organization of thought?
Pan-semiotism gives an answer to panpsychism. Meaning is physical and makes information possible. Meaning is more mundane at lower levels of physical reality not more profound.
Do the guys know the work of Niklas Luhmann? It really gave me some orientation in novel ways regarding the big picture and the world, or better society we live in.
Is this a deck of cards? Cause I see four kings
Same
💀
you aced that joke. what a diamond. is there a club we can join?
Larry, Curly, Moe and Shemp and will be remembered as such for existing before color.
I see one king, one jack and two jokers.
RIP Dan Dennett - was surprised to hear of his passing after having watched this interview not too long ago :(
Exactly. He didn't seem unhealthy from this video. Maybe a bit slow but that's common with aging.
Really surprised to see him dead after watching him on this podcast.
We lost a great one. :(
RIP Dr. D. So glad I got to see this conversation. 🖤😔
Idk how you get such quality guests so consistently, but I'm not complaining!
We are lucky indeed
Thanks!
Dude is connected.
The guest list reads like a lolita express passenger log.
Wow, the algorithm struck gold on this one. Don't know how this is the first time I've seen this channel, but you got a sub.
Less than a month later, RIP Dan Dennett (19 April, 2024). How sharp his mind still was, and how healthy he seemed, so near the end. I hope he didn't suffer in the weeks following this panel. It was probably one of the last public appearances he did.
What a great illusory consciousness, evaporating into.. this.. space. And then there were two.
Nothing better than getting great minds who disagree into the same room to hear each other's points and discuss, rather than having to listen to one interview at a time and wonder what each would say to the other if they were present. Tremendously useful discussion. Thank you all!
Why has this just 53k views? 🤯 Thank you so much for this great conversation!
Three of my favorite thinkers of all time. You’ve had so many great guests but you’ve really outdone yourself this time. Please keep these wonderful conversations going. Also, you’ve improved as a host, asking the right questions and comments. Bravo 👏
Thank you!
I guess they are great thinkers, but not when it comes to the subjects in the title, namely spirituality, Parapsychology, Panpsychism and even Physics Violation. The last one because the Physics is about the fundamental laws of the physical (materialistic) world that don't change and are obeyed by abstract entities that we (physicists) abstracted in nature, like mass, energy, work, heat, velocity etc etc. So basically they don't think, or think in a wrong way when it comes to these questions.
@@yanair2091 "We" ? 😂😂😂
@@isitme1234yes we physicists. We meet on the third Saturday of every month to discuss matters of the physical, solve equations and such. If you'd like to attend you must email in advance. Everyone is going to wear Hawaiian shirts this meeting. Oh and bring a covered dish.
What a delightful discussion to listen to and especially one last opportunity to hear from the wonderful Dan Dennett. Thank you so much.
I always appreciate a Sean Carroll episode! This is another great one!
He is such a great intellectual
@@usefmary1227 despite the fact that his claim on the unlikeliness of psychic phenomena was based on a pretty clear logical fallacy but I don't see you two FANS noticing ahahahah. Well I did *pats self on back*. I even wrote a comment about it which clearly demonstrates the fallacy. My work here is done
@@radscorpion8 of course you seem the kind of a guy who doesn't like logical fallacies ..
@@radscorpion8When you wrote that comment (which I responded to) had you actually listened to that discussion section of the podcast, or just reported your first knee-jerk reaction to the edit in the intro? It really seems like the latter.
I did not know I needed to see these 3 gents in a conversation, but man I did, awesome discussion!
what a great line up, happy geeseling right here. as regards your 200th show - congrats dude, you really are doing a great job and we appreciate it enormously.
Thanks so much!!!
Congratulations Robinson, 200 episodes very cool, you consistently have great people to engage with and that benefits all of us, fantastic panel for number 200, thank you Daniel, Sean, Steven, and Robinson for sharing your time and work, 20 years ago you'd have to spend a week deep in a library to begin to gather the information presented here and its greatly appreciated, peace
Thanks so much, Billy!
This podcast is a hidden treasure. Congrats on episode 200 👏
Thank you!!
100% agree - a hidden treasure, this is so far the best podcast of his that I've had the privilege to listen to!
This is a hidden treasure, and is so far the best podcast of yours, Robinson, that I've had the privilege to listen to!
Amazing guests and conversation. Great job! I like when you are less cat petting and more involved just in weeding out questions and ideas.
Such a delight listening to this episode. Time well spent. Thank you.
What a fantastic group of people to have in one episode!
Wow I just watched this again, and I have to say I think I learn more listening to these guys discuss then any other podcast I've seen in a long time… You're really good at this Robinson, not only adding to the discussion but prompting deeper and further insights from these great minds… Kudos!
All highly likeable people. Peaceful and educational. Thank you.
Very apt selection of guests whose expertise overlap and differentiate in productive and enlightening ways, especially when talking about teleology, with Sean, then Dan, then Steve piggybacking on each other and expanding the discussion.
For some reason this was playing on my cell phone at times two speed when I woke up. My brain had been translated this into a dream where I was at a preppy frat party that doubled as an in processing station for drawing military gear for a deployment.
I was going from station to station and had to wait in various lines to either play beer games or draw more T-50 (military gear). While in each line I was discussing all these super deep philosophical issues with people. When I woke up I immediately realized that I am not as smart as my dream made me think I am, but it did clarify how my interpretation of the world is really messed up.
So glad we got to listen to Mr.Dennett! Such a great philosopher!
at one point (around 1:25:00) Dennett is talking about degrees of things and not absolutes or definite lines between certain things. I think it’s logically almost impossible to avoid answering a question about a “first instance” of any appearance. For example, there had to be a first moment when something was alive rather than not alive and same with consciousness. The other possibility is that these things are just not emergent and rather constantly evolving characteristics of things.
Absolute home run podcast guest list! Congrats Robin!
Glad you enjoyed it!
The whole gang ROCKS! ty for this great congrats on so many beautiful podcasts+more! Thank you all !
What awesome guests all at once! Such a great podcast! I also really liked these topics. Thanks!!
Love Pinker and Dennett (RIP) this was food for thought as usual with them
Man you are an absolute legend. That's an all star line-up right there for the 200th. Thank you!
blushing
Great episode, Robinson! Please keep up the good work!!!
Thank you. I'd never heard of this podcast or person and I really enjoyed it.
Glad you enjoyed it!
If Steven Pinker is present, it's worth listening to. Sean and D. Dennett are bonus.
So glad this channel popped back into my feed. It’s been a while
Congrats on 200 episodes!
Thanks!!
Watching from India. No podcast thumbnail has made me more excited than this. Great minds.
26:16 Exactly .. this is my concern right now as well. Aside from those drudgery jobs, AI is supposed to solve the climate crisis and cancer, not ruin art, culture and music
From a retired academic (me): academic research is largely based on competitive grants. It's inevitable that people competing for grants will turn ot AI machinery to crank out applications. Up till now we had to sweat to put together proposals that fit the different requirements of each grant. With AI anyone will be able to apply to every single grant available, in different foreign languages to boot.
Has academia discussed this prospect? Or are you all still stuck on figuring out how to prevent students from cheating on their papers?
Robinson Erhardt, you really know how to throw a party! Thank you very much sir!!
We missed a greatest philosopher/thinker in 21 century, Dan you are always alife in our heart ” its real but not what you think its” you are a therapiest of philosophy/linguistic!
Can’t believe this level of content is available and free. What a time to be alive.
Beloved, keep watch!
Great to see Sean Carroll on the show. The main other channel I watch is his, he's a fantastic science/philosophy communicator.
Sick meeting of the minds nice job setting this up!!!
I think the problem with "illusion" applying to consciousness or free will is that the word carries a "fake" connotation. Something that isn't what you think it is, is not fake or unreal.
Yeah, it's a curiously terrible word to use to communicate what "illusionists" are generally claiming.
if we take free will by word than the answer is clearly no. sorry human beings are wrong in many aspects. and they are less smart than they think. They should be waked up from their philosophical dreams. Can a person who can neither speak Chinese, nor master HTML, nor is a grandmaster at chess, nor can prove that the square root of two is not a rational number, nor understands the processes in the sun, be compared to AGI at all? LLM outprfom most humans in many aspects.
Dennett is trying his hardest to avoid dualism, but I don’t think he’s successful. Calling consciousness an “illusion” is just a word game.
@@CJ-cd5cd Consciousness as part of a model being computed by the brain is actually kinda dualistic, but not in the same way it has traditionally been characterized in philosophical circles.
RIP Daniel, this episode was first thing I thought of when I heard he died. So recent
Sean carroll. Wow what a banger lineup
:)
Three of my favorite modern thinkers all in one place. I don't know Robinson but I will be following his YT feed from now on.
Awesome. Great conversation!
Wow! Thank you for such a great talk!
As someone both developing artificial intelligences and interested in what their observed phenomena teach us about intelligence in general, it’s great to see such a nuanced discussion. Thanks Robinson, and congratulations on the big 2 zero zero.
Thank you!!!
All i can say is WOW! What a panel of guests..got yourself a new sub! keep up the great work
No way Sean. You can always tell a famous scientist's authenticity. Great job with these guests!
Krauss and Carroll episodes so close together is awesome.
Two very enjoyable, thought-provoking hours. Thanks, gents!
I'm not buying it from Steven when he says at around 24:50 that there are very few signs of technologically driven unemployment. I am an Uber Driver, a Doordash driver, and Amazon driver, and all of these delivery platforms are run by artificial intelligence and algorithms. I don't have a real person for a boss, I have a counterfeit person who never speaks to me or let's me know he even exists. He solely controls how much money I earn, what work I can possibly do, the extent to which I am able to earn money. I was hired by a fake person and I can be fired by a fake person. Or "deactivated" for the technical lingo. There is a term in economics called "algorithmic wage discrimination," and it's pretty much exactly like the way a reasonable might expect it to be based on the name of the phenomenon. What countermeasures are in place to prevent this? The government generally seems concerned with only whether or not workers like myself are classified as independent contractors or as employees, and not concerned with this.
Yeah it's true that while you know, pizza places and other restaurants have largely fired all of their delivery drivers in favor of AI based delivery, and I get a job because of it, but I'm probably making about the same amount of money as those employed workers made, and I don't get the rights that are guaranteed to employees because I'm legally a contractor. And Uber/Lyft rides etc are also based on an AI/algorithm model. They've displaced some vast number of taxicab workers and companies. Is this a good trade off? I'm not so sure it is. I think Dan Dennett's concerns are very well-founded.
Wow what an incredible lineup. Cudos Robinson for organizing this, you've earned my sub
Three of my favorite public intellectuals. I'm not sure you could do better.
I think David Deutsch sums it up when he said this to Sam Harris- “science and philosophy are both manifestations of reason”.
Wow. Well done Robinson. This is WAY! better than politics.
Just a little over 25 years ago, no physicist could have dreamed of dark energy. Now most believe it's the most abundant form of energy in the universe. Given that history, it's amazing physicists like Sean Carroll so blithely dismiss other possible forms of energy that might be mediating "metaphysical" phenomena.
It is odd, isn't it. Stuff like this makes you realise that scientists are just humans, and I think all people would benefit from realising that. The rise of scientism is quite disturbing, where scientists are treated as a kind of priest class that are gatekeepers of truth.
He’s explained this before on Mindscape. We have complete theories at most energy scales. The frontier of physics is dealing in extreme energies such that any new findings will have zero effect on physics at our scale. The door has effectively closed for parapsychology and such.
@@chemquests Yup, there's that signature hubris. You're in good company with Lord Kelvin who blundered "There's nothing new to be discovered in physics" back in 1900, lol.
@@keppela1 I didn’t say nothing new; I qualified it with “at the relevant energies”. You heard Sean explain that it would require photos for telekinesis to work; these are principled arguments that limit what’s possible. You’d first have to propose a physical mechanism before anyone entertains these ideas seriously, which is fair. Do you expect to blurt out anything at all and always be taken seriously?
@@chemquests The only thing I've "blurted out" are factual examples of how physicists have been proven spectacularly wrong before. Given that history, I think a little humility is in order.
Awesome guests and very interesting topics.
Rip Daniel dennett
Looks interesting, I really love listening to the best modern day philosopher there is, Sean Carroll
How are you getting these guests?? You have 20k subs and play with cats. I’m impressed. Keep it up.
Awesome to see top thinkers in their respective fields. Looking forward to more such 👍
Steven Pinker is totally inspiring…❤🔥
I agree with Dennett. With AI truth becomes just a miniscule noise within a sea of nonsense. The countermeasure then is to not trust anything, and all comes to halt (at best).
Dame I love these fellers, my favourite critical thinkers 😊
First video I’ve seen of yours. Instant subscribe
What is the painting over the hosts right shoulder?
On the first point about counterfeit humans i believe Daniel Dennett is spot on. I am grateful there are still people giving caution and saying we should slow down.
Nah I’m good on waiting, people deserve to be cured of all these diseases like aging. Slowing ai will hamper that. Everyone deserves an opportunity at immortality
One day we will be blessed to hear Sean play that bass in the bass, hopefully with Lex
Awesome. I have shown two out of three of these men's artwork in New York (Dennett and Pinker), does Sean make art?
I would like to issue a correction
you said:
"Sean Carroll ... the host of Mindscape which is the best philosophy and science show out there".
but this is simply untrue because YOUR show is the best philosophy and science show out there! Mindscape is a close second though.
Rest in peace Daniel..
This is awesome
"... the laws of the Universe don't care about our goals, our concepts, our values, they just happen." Amen.
The telephone A.I scams on the elderly using voices of relatives is heartbreaking. Thhe depths humans will go to hurt others is disgusting
jesus christ 🍿
HE KEEPS DOING IT! WTF ARE THOSE GUESTS WOW! cant wait
Was an Alien splice. Immaculate conception in a sense.
santa claus!! 🧑🎄
@@HarryNicNicholasYou get easily triggered, don't you? 😅
Now that is brilliant comment 😂😂😂
Get Dean Radin and Ed Kelly on the show for a balanced discussion of psi phenomena.
my guy does not miss 🎯
Hadn't watched Sean Carroll for a while, and I just realised that in my memory (e.g. the way I'd picture him when reading something of his) he had completely morphed into Pete Holmes, maybe with a hint of Paul Bloom, too.
Look at Pinker holding that desk mic.
To me, I think of how Daniel Dennett's free will and R. Sapolsky's free will may differ. Dennett will say that the skier is making decisions from within their mind to mitigate their destination as gravity pulls them down the slope compared to a rock that simply tumbles and is affected by external factors. But Sapolsky has a broader definition. He might say, "Why is the skier even at that slope? Why are they even a skier? What factors and influences led them to become a skier? What type of economics allowed them to afford good skis? What genetics allow them to be a good skier with good balance and athletic constitution? Would they even have been a skier if they'd had parents from Florida who adopted the skier when they were a baby?" Dennett seems to say a person is aware of the past and the present, and they are making choices themselves at the moment, but Sapolsky seems to say that a person is the end result of things they had no control over, simply reacting to an environment based on conditioning and past influence over their organism, and that they can do no more than to be as such.
RIP Dr. Dennett :(
49:00 Dennett makes a good point, albeit inadvertently, about our relationship to language in general. I’m thinking of how phenomena exist prior to the words we invent to describe them. I believe, we get lost in word meanings and conceptual constructs, when the original insight and context is forgotten. Basically, we’re limited in what we can discuss accurately. Nevertheless, I described this idea using words
Great chat
Three great thinkers, one great video.
I really enjoy your show! And even if I have disagreements with Dennett, Pinker and Carroll on the particular issue that this show confronts, I enjoyed this one, too. Having said this, why haven't you had Thomas Nagel (NYU) on your show? Of course, he believes that the mental is not reducible to the material. Thus, he poses a form of neutral monism that could possibly account for the mind, something that Nagel argues that a purely physicalist account cannot account for. Carroll threw his cards on the table, the physical laws of the universe -- mostly quantum laws -- are the only game in town. Nagel would disagree and pose a form of teleology that could plausibly account for the mind. I am sympathetic to Nagel's quest. At any rate, a show with Nagel would be great. Keep up the good work!
1:04:14 "Although the advanced
potentials are entirely consistent with Maxwell’s equations, they violate the most
sacred tenet in all of physics: the principle of causality. They suggest that the potentials
now depend on what the charge and the current distribution will be at some time in the future-the effect, in other words, precedes the cause. Although the
advanced potentials are of some theoretical interest, they have no direct physical
significance."
Section 10.2 continuous distributions
"This is not an idle curiosity, for it rescues the notion of causality, on which all physics is based"
Section 12.1 The special theory of Relativity
These passages are from David Griffith textbook introduction to electrodynamics (Fourth edition).
I mean I would not take Sean seriously when he said you will not find causality or cause and effect in physics textbooks (he did not say electrodynamics but that applies too) and for sure Griffith asserts that some laws have time symmetry (time reversal invariant) which aggress with what Sean said but still Griffith said that causality is the most important law!
Sean just wanted to dismiss William Lane Craig ideas and other theists and therefore he said what he said but I do not think he holds that seriously.
Amazing episode!
Has something happened to Daniel Dennet? his cadence seems quite off from when I last saw him on a podcast.
Very Cool Episode!
Thank you SO SO much for this.
My pleasure!
would love for you to interview the economist Mark Blyth one day. just putting that out there into the universe. great episode, thank you!
Was this interview done 2 weeks before Daniel Dennett's passing ?
27:45 I haven't disagreed with Steve on very many things but what he sais here is wrong. Creative industries are moving towards ai generated imagery. Shutterstock and sites like it are on track to be put out of business by AI created images. So in that context at least, people are definitely willing to pay less for AI images instead of pay more for images taken by a photographer or drawn by a human artist.
What makes Sean think that psychic powers are mediated through particles? It might be through entanglement. And how does Sean account for brain waves corresponding to organized thought, what accounts for the organization of thought?
Pan-semiotism gives an answer to panpsychism. Meaning is physical and makes information possible. Meaning is more mundane at lower levels of physical reality not more profound.
Do the guys know the work of Niklas Luhmann? It really gave me some orientation in novel ways regarding the big picture and the world, or better society we live in.