Craig Foster of SBS does an excellent analysis. And when he explains what we can see vs the reason the referee gave the penalty and it is clear. The penalty was not warranted on the reason gave by the ref.
Strong and balanced analysis lads. Defender gets touch on ball and the referee who was in good position said no first time (seeing it in real time) and so it was not a clear error - even on super slow-mo. So then the decision should not have been reversed.
The on field decision should matter, if no penalty is given on the field then there needs to be conclusive evidence there is a penalty. Quality dive but that Frenchman tho.
The loss of the Australian football team is partly responsible for the players, especially the defensive right side of the team, but the responsibility is all for the poor coach who does not have the training capabilities for high level in( the World Cup). Our boys played hard and with manhood but were disappointed by the coach who took the great scorer TIM Cahill with this team and We were waiting for his participation against France and Denmark Tim was involved on the last game or you can say to embarrass him in the game of Peru to turn the result . This team must be retained and equipped for the next World Cup
Dale Ward The defender didn't touch the ball at all. The pundit said it wrong. Watch the clip from FIFATV carefully. I have also seen a few replays from different angles. He 100% didn't touch the ball.
But the discussion is, if you are listening, did Risdon touch the ball first? That is the question because if Risdon touch the ball first than it should not have not been a penalty.
Rhombus if you are so apalled by the sport dont watch. The rules are what they are and its a penalty. You also dont have to resort to childish namecalling.. also if Australia had been in that position you would probably cry for a penalty tough guy.
You better check your eye sight, angle behind the goal clearly shows Aussie player touch the ball before he touch the France player in the follow through, clearly no penalty , what's the point of having VAR then. Clearly biased decision obviously they don't want to France so called world champion to lose, very ordinary France side, umpire saved them and they get 3 points...
![England vs Tunisia 2-1 | Extended Higlights and goals [World Cup 2018]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/oKaWlZktySU/mqdefault.jpg)
Amazing how the English press think it’s a penalty,unbelievable the Poms.
Australia and Ireland play very similar in all sports with alot of heart and guts.
Thanks for the uploads, you're my hero!
Craig Foster of SBS does an excellent analysis. And when he explains what we can see vs the reason the referee gave the penalty and it is clear. The penalty was not warranted on the reason gave by the ref.
Thank you for the upload. I thought Australia deserved the draw. France really need to improve. Faster passing and more intention.
Great analysis.
Strong and balanced analysis lads. Defender gets touch on ball and the referee who was in good position said no first time (seeing it in real time) and so it was not a clear error - even on super slow-mo. So then the decision should not have been reversed.
Great new video angle which has been posted below shows Australia were robbed 100% no penalty
stavvy stavvy VAR would have that camera view also,blatant cheating.
def not a penalty. disgraceful decision that costs everybody. the referee initially decided no penalty then changed his mind. what a joke.
The frog dived when he realized he couldn't catch the ball
Bs australia made so many fault should have been red cards these stupid guys thinks its rugby or something they should stop playing football.
The on field decision should matter, if no penalty is given on the field then there needs to be conclusive evidence there is a penalty. Quality dive but that Frenchman tho.
The loss of the Australian football team is partly responsible for the players, especially the defensive right side of the team, but the responsibility is all for the poor coach who does not have the training capabilities for high level in( the World Cup). Our boys played hard and with manhood but were disappointed by the coach who took the great scorer TIM Cahill with this team and We were waiting for his participation against France and Denmark Tim was involved on the last game or you can say to embarrass him in the game of Peru to turn the result . This team must be retained and equipped for the next World Cup
Not impressed with France at all
Are you surprised? Lots of talent but zero heart.
@@michaeltricoli5008 ...easy to say, after the event.
Soccer is one of the toughest sports,rivalling ballet and syncronised swimming said a reknowned expert........
lol soccer
If y'all watch the replay, you would all see with your blind eyes that the defender clipped is left foot. 💯 Right decision
Godwin James Apuede He touches the ball slightly before making contact with the player
Dale Ward
The defender didn't touch the ball at all. The pundit said it wrong. Watch the clip from FIFATV carefully. I have also seen a few replays from different angles. He 100% didn't touch the ball.
You're wrong. He does get the ball.
facebook.com/optussport/videos/650415131976500/
I don't understand how you people can't see that he touched the ball, it's so blatantly obvious.
But the discussion is, if you are listening, did Risdon touch the ball first? That is the question because if Risdon touch the ball first than it should not have not been a penalty.
Ofcourse its a penalty.. why are these analysis so bad?
Rhombus if you are so apalled by the sport dont watch. The rules are what they are and its a penalty. You also dont have to resort to childish namecalling.. also if Australia had been in that position you would probably cry for a penalty tough guy.
Stephan Rasmussen Mate go watch the new replays that came out and come back to me.
Stephan Rasmussen th-cam.com/video/E62Z3a5qjyQ/w-d-xo.html there you go skip to 1:33.
Wow he better check his eye-sight. The Aussie player clearly didn't touch the ball. That is clearly a penalty.
You better check your eye sight, angle behind the goal clearly shows Aussie player touch the ball before he touch the France player in the follow through, clearly no penalty , what's the point of having VAR then. Clearly biased decision obviously they don't want to France so called world champion to lose, very ordinary France side, umpire saved them and they get 3 points...
he did get a touch on the ball, look at the view from the front
dummy
lina sun someone needs an eyetest,ball clearly deviates.
Recommend that you watch this link th-cam.com/video/E62Z3a5qjyQ/w-d-xo.html
Aussies the weepers