Ann Taylor is hoping for September so that the jurors will rush through their decision just to get home to their families by Thanksgiving She has had almost 2 years to be working on this
I can't believe this is going on almost 2 years for all those victims involved in this and we still have 6 months before the trial this is not fair to the victims he has had enough time
What prosecutor takes 18 months to turn over discovery? Bill Thompson. Much of the defenses experts rely on the discovery. If Thompson took nearly 2 years to turn over the discovery then I think the real question here is why isn’t the prosecution turning over evidence in a timely fashion? He had to be ordered multiple times to provide the defense with evidence and the rest of the discovery. He only complied to the order JUST before this hearing. The problem here is the prosecution. The defense hasn’t failed to turn over their evidence nor have they been given a deadline to do so. It’s not a good look for the prosecution and only shows the the previous judge was lazy and took weeks to make decisions and in some instances not issuing a decision on motions. There are numerous motions he never even ruled on. I think this judge will whip this case into shape and we’ll see things actually getting accomplished or he’ll see that there’s some serious problems with the investigation and it’ll eventually get thrown out. The prosecution is looking embarrassing at this point
It’s NOT HER!! It’s been impossible to find a fair jury! I was ALL IN that he was prob guilty (but waiting for trial/evidence) but LOTS of info that points to his innocence.🤷♀️The police are soooo shady!!! Soooo much sus!!!
It’s easy to want to blame Anne Taylor but that just shows that you havent been following this case closely so you aren’t aware of the facts of the case. That or you just aren’t sure how long it takes to bring a death penalty case to trial. Death penalty cases often take well over 2 years to make it to trial. There’s significantly more steps in the process that are required to happen during the trial. First, DP cases have a mitigation phase where the defense has have mitigation experts look at certain factors that could impact the judges or juries decision on sentencing a defendant with the DP. That phase adds an additional one to two weeks to the length of a trial and sentencing. This is a requirement of the defense in all death penalty cases. If their expert passed away, then this is out of their control and it’s not a delay tactic to need additional time. Second, if you go back to the end of the video and listen to this judge say that he will be responding to motion and making decisions quicker than they’re accustomed to typically less than 14 days. That should be your first clue that Anne Taylor couldn’t possibly be the problem for the delay in this case. JJJ said after his arrest he wanted to get this to trial and made it seem like it was imperative to have a trial but instead he’s dilly dallied around regarding every single motion ever filed. He couldn’t make a decision in court. Like ever. He always had to take advisement on motions and he took weeks to respond. Matter of fact, there are STILL motions JJJ hasn’t even made a ruling on and it’s been moved to another county. It’s embarrassing and it’s really a shame that we have people in jail awaiting trial and there’s judges like JJJ who are presiding over their case yet they carry on as if there’s no need to make decisions and get the ball rolling. Last, you didn’t hear the judge asking the defense if they’ve met a deadline. He asked if the State had it complied with the deadline to turn over all of their evidence to the defense. Maybe you’re not up to speed on the happenings on this case but there have been repeated deadlines given to the State to turn over all of the discovery to the defense and they haven’t complied with ANY of them. There has not been one deadline placed on the defense due to them not doing what was asked of them. If you notice Thompson said he had met the deadline, conveniently JUST before this hearing so the defense hadn’t even had time to review it. The defense has consistently filed things last minute before hearings and even late in the day on a Friday. This December will be 24 months since Bryan’s arrest….there is no excuse for it to take the State approximately 18 months to turn over discovery to the defense. Also, if you go back through the motions on the Idaho website, you’ll find Anne Taylor and the other defense counsel have all been on top of filing responses and motions. She’s stated in open court that her team is working strictly on the Kohberger case so I don’t think you’re aware of what’s going on in this case. Anne Taylor isn’t the problem. You really have to pay attention to what’s not being said or done on this case. For instance, the state told JJJ back last year that the state was ready to go to trial in summer of 2023 if Bryan didn’t waive his right his right to a speedy trial. That’s absolute nonsense bc here it is September 2023 and he just turned over everything. If he claimed he was ready to go to trial in 2023 then what was the hold up on turning the complete discovery til now? Was he lying to the judge last year and not actually ready for a trial or has he been lying for the last year and purposely refusing to hand over all the discovery until now? You have to ask yourself why would the the prosecutor do that? He hasn’t said there’s been any other problem since he said he was ready. This is all backed up by hearings and court documents where you can verify that Bill Thompson and JJJ have both delayed delayed delayed while simultaneously claiming they want to get this trial. It’s wild but they do that bc they know the average person isn’t going to be looking through motions or watching entire hearings, they’re going to hear bits and pieces and assume he’s desperate to get things moving therefore the defense must the problem. If you’re not up to speed on this case then you’re going to fully believe that Bryan Kohberger is guilty of this crime but in all seriousness, I implore you to really dig a bit into the facts of this case and I believe that you will start to change your opinion about whether or not the state has the right guy. In my opinion, they absolutely don’t have the right person. In the May hearing, Anne Taylor asked the lead investigator what specific evidence he relied on to arrest Bryan. officer Payne stated on the stand that he had reviewed this particular evidence and given it to the FBI to review and they worked together using that evidence to write the PCA to arrest Bryan. The prosecution realized what the defense was asking about and they asked Officer Payne if he was aware he didn’t the he didn’t have that evidence in December when he wrote the PCA. He said he didn’t know? Jennings asked Payne if he was aware that that evidence wasn’t obtained until 8 months later in May? Payne said yes. That is him admitting he lied to have Bryan arrested. There are many things that have since come to light showing the police were dishonest in this case. Anne Taylor has already stated in court that she was going to be filing a motion requesting a franks hearing. If you’re not familiar with a franks hearing is, it is a motion asking for the case to be dismissed due to police or LE lying in the evidence used to arrest the defendant. These are serious allegations and they’re rarely requested bc it’s not often that attorneys outright accuse LE of wrongdoing and misconduct. Franks Motion require the defense to provide evidence supporting their motion so it’s not something that’s filed with bogus or vague allegations. We’ve only seen it in the Delphi case but according to the defense they are working on a franks motion. This case also went before a federal grand jury and they didn’t indict him. I’m sure you’ve heard people say a grand jury would indict a ham sandwich bc something like 90% of all cases put before a GJ will be indicted. That should tell you something if a federal GJ didn’t return an indictment. This case doesn’t point to Bryan Kohberger once you dig into the facts of the case. My personal opinion is that this case will get thrown out. This judge even said if this goes to trial. It’s possible it’s something he says in all cases but I believe this judge will throw the case out. LE, the town of Moscow and Uni of Idaho NEEDED an arrest before students came back from Christmas break. They were losing students in droves. Students had left campus and were afraid to return opting for online classes instead. This was going to have a huge negative economic impact on the school and the city. Students account for 70% of the population or something like that so that’s some serious revenue during school sessions. There’s more things that aren’t right in this case but my comment would be too long. I would caution against trusting those in charge of this case and as they say follow the money. There’s been other cases in Idaho where they’ve wrongfully arrested people for murder like the Brian Drake murder. They arrested Dr Dan Moore and he was innocent. The judge threw that case out for violating his constitutional rights but if you check out Truth and Transparency’s videos on the case she’s went through the discovery and found reports where ISP officers were lying and hiding evidence.
They also illegally did the IGG which is why the prosecution says they aren’t using it. IGG is only to be used for cold cases and unsolved cases. If you look up the laws on this there are steps they have to take but the prosecutor is the only person who can authorize IGG testing on cases. I’m not sure how this case was allowed to go through. There truly a step by step process laid out on how to have IGG testing on a case. Tbh I’m thinking there was some illegal stuff going on with the LE using DNA in this case. I’m wondering if they didn’t turn over the suspect DNA to a lab or ancestory site illegally to try to determine whose dna it was then worked backwards. There was a hearing where expert Gabriella Vargas testified. She is essentially the founder of the IGG process so she’s the leading expert on everything IGG. She “discovered” it and she has taught her method and it has since became its own industry or area of expertise in all the uses of DNA. She testified that she has been able to solve cases using her method and explained the limitations of genealogical dna. IGG doesn’t pinpoint a match and it’s takes someone going through for weeks to determine markers that match between very distant family members. The IGG process can only take you so far in finding family members and she testified to LE abusing the process to solve crimes. This was bombshell info. Very serious because the higher courts have ruled on the use of IGG methods. They’re to be limited to cold cases, unsolved cases that have exhausted all other investigative techniques AND that DNA and dna profiles, etc even profiles used for genealogical purposes is Constitutionally protected. So LE were only allowed to access profiles of DNA that had opted IN to allow LE use their genealogical link in solving cases. However Ms Vargas’ testimony was that had first hand knowledge that LE were illegally accessing even the users who had opted OUT of LE use. She gave the process and explained How they were still using opted out profiles and doing it without getting caught and figuring out who the suspect was and basically then they could try to work the case to fit the suspect. Her testimony as an expert for the defense should tell you how LE didn’t handle things right in this case. There were laws put in place on this bc DNA has become so advanced that it almost shoots itself in the foot. Now we have touch dna that is left so easily that it could implicate the wrong person for a crime. Take the Jon Benet Ramsey case years ago. They had dna testing on her undies and dna came back from worker on China or Vietnam I can’t recall exactly where but it was overseas. That’s how easily it can get on anything you touch. DNA seems absolute and all well and good until we get to a case like that or in this case someone who wasn’t in or around the area to commit the crime. His dna could’ve been passed from touching a door that the actual killer touched and been transferred to the knife. I personally don’t think that’s how it happened bc ONLY his dna was on the knife not even the victims or the actual killer. Which doesn’t make sense. Anne Taylor said in the beginning that the knife sheath was placed at the scene. That’s a serious accusation and bold. Anyways, the IGG process was abused in this process. The prosecution wants to make that go away by saying they’re not using the IGG in trial. It’s bc they know they weren’t legally allowed to use it and someone used it anyway. I personally believe it was the FBI. Vargas also stated her method uses the databases like 23 and Me, etc and that LE can access those too illegally. I’m sure you’ve heard recently about ALL the board members resigning from 23 and Me? There’s some serious things going to come up about LE and DNA. Sit back and watch. We’re going to find out eventually that LE have been doing this for years under our noses and it’s going to be massive. It’s all just starting to come to light. It’s also in court documents that the FBI turned in a tip that consisted only of two words - Bryan Kohberger’s name. Why would the FBI give this information through a tip line? They were working on the case side by side with MPD, ISP and Latah County. There’s too many inconsistencies. Things aren’t adding up as the case moves on. If they’ve used IGG in current cases and gotten away with it, my guess is they got lucky on past cases where their suspect was actually the right guy and despite using illegal tactics to find their guy, they were able to work the facts and evidence around so they could legally arrest the suspect. They tried to do that in this case but everything’s falling through bc he isn’t actually the killer. Their dirty tactics and lies are being exposed bc they’re having to show their work and their work ain’t adding up. This is why lawmakers put limitations on using IGG. They predicted this could happen. Test dna instead of working the investigation and following where the facts and evidence take you. Someone else’s dna could implicate the wrong person. I think that’s exactly what’s happened in this case. They also had Sy Ray as an expert in cellular data and he said LE filed a warrant on Bryan’s phone to track him but he didn’t understand why they did that because he said according to the reports he had LE were actually monitoring his movements so it was really disingenuous to tell the courts they needed it to track him when they knew exactly where he was. Sy Ray has testified in hundreds of cases because he to created one of the programs used for tracking cell phone data. When he’s on the stand saying their reports are incomplete and he didn’t know how they got to Bryan based on the reports they turned over. It’s bc Payne lied in the PCA and didn’t have those reports at the time. It’s also important to note that Sy Ray has NEVER testified for the defense as long as he’s been doing this. He also doesn’t charge for his testimony. He doesn’t make money to testify as an expert. I think that says a lot about his credibility. LE in this case are untrustworthy. When an LE officer lies in court under oath or in legal documents nothing they say from that point forward can be trusted. More lies will come out and it’s really unfortunate bc that means the real killer is still out there. Also i have a video on my channel from the hearing where the prosecution and Payne admit to not having the evidence he says he had in the PCA. I hope more people come aware of the inconsistencies in this case and call these LE out on their unscrupulous conduct. It’s bad in Idaho.
@@roxdarmurray6634 29:00 His team relying & investing entirely on a *mitigation expert* LOL ..this says alot! His defense knows he is _guilty_ & preparing for a guilty verdict. And more focused on sentencing. Terrible news for Kohberger sitting there
Hers is delayed because she has done theough so many lawyers, this case has been delayed so many times because the prosecution has not handed over full discovery , very different circumstances
First was changing venue and she keeps dragging the trial because of experts . What is it she wants 2026 really. I like this judge that wants to be on time.
It’s not the defense. The state has not complied with deadline after deadline. I went to the website that has all of the filings in this case and I haven’t read every single document yet, I did read all of the motions and responses from each side. I could not find one deadline that the defense didn’t meet. They have had their case completed by the deadlines agreed upon or the ones the judge ordered. However, I have seen numerous deadlines that the state missed and would say they would comply by another date and they didn’t comply. The judge eventually ordered a couple of deadlines that they complied with on the very last day. One of which they responded at 4:45p on a Friday. It’s not a good look for the prosecution at all. The state only fully complied with the deadline to turn over the rest of the discovery just before this hearing. I try to look at the facts on both sides and honestly the state isn’t looking good at all. I’ve lost a lot on trust in them after the previous hearing where the state admitted that the lead investigator lied in the PCA. They’re aware the lead investigator lied during the investigation and it looked like they were trying to help the investigator during his testimony by asking him leading questions bc he was lying during cross examination by the defense. Towards the end of Officer Brett Payne’s testimony the defense was asking Payne about search warrants he applied for in December for cell phone data. They asked him when did he get the defendant’s cell phone records back from the cell phone company? He said he applied for the search warrant and the company sent them on the same day. He wrote in the PCA that both he and the FBI reviewed them and decided to write another search warrant for 60 days worth of his phone records. He said the judge signed it and he sent that to the phone company. He said the company sent him the rest of the phone records and again he and the FBI reviewed the phone records still all on the same day. He said he used a program on the computer to make a map to track his location then the FBI entered all the required info from the cell phone records into their CAST program to track the defendant’s movements using the pings so he used that as a reference to make his own map of his movements. He said he did all these things in the same day. The defense asked him where are the search warrant returns for those phone records? Because every time they get something due to a search warrant, it is documented and filed like motions and orders so it becomes a legal filing. Search warrant returns weren’t filed in December indicating cell phone records were search warrant returns. The defense told Brett Payne the only search warrant returns filed were in May. The search warrant return says it was for the 2 December search warrants. However he continued to say AT&T actually sent them on that day in December. Later, the prosecution asks Brett Payne “Are you aware that you did not receive any cell phone data in December? He answered “I’m not sure.” Then she asked “Are you aware that you did not receive ANY search warrants until May of 2023?” He answered “yes.” It goes back to the defense and they ask “If you wrote in the PCA that you had Brian’s cell phone records back in December but you didn’t, why would you lie?” He answered “I just wrote what they told me to write.” I was shocked. Not only did the lead investigator lie in the arrest affidavit and open court but even prosecution is aware. I have a real problem with that. In addition to local LE using a new officer to lead this investigation. I still can’t wrap my head around that. Payne had been at MPD for 2 years it seems a seasoned, experienced detective would be crucial for a quadruple murder. I’m not judging, I’m just trying to understand the department’s choice to put him on this case especially considering this area doesn’t have murders often. I’ve found some other things that appear to be untrue and even where it appears they were tracking the defendant’s phone during a time that wasn’t allowed in the search warrant. The part where Brett Payne said that the defendants cell phone had not pinged on towers near the murder scene since the murder. They didn’t have a search warrant that allowed them to track his phone up to the date of the PCA. I’m thinking he put that in there without realizing he was admitting in court documents that they were still tracking his phone despite the court order not covering the dates after November 14th. I know those don’t seem like a huge deal but if the police will lie during their investigation or lie to arrest somebody then it ruins their credibility. Anyway, I understand where it looks like the defense is frequently making requests for different things but from what I can tell it’s due to the state dragging their feet and the defense wastes so much time writing and filing motions asking the court to compel the state to comply. There was a significant amount of time wasted due to the state argument against the experts polling the community. The state filed a motion to block the polling on a Friday afternoon at 4:45p. The judge filed a motion minutes after receiving it ordering all polling to stop and they had to wait to have a hearing and the defense had to bring in the polling experts two weeks later. All of that time was wasted that both sides weren’t working on the case. Polling community for bias is a common practice in the legal system. The state and the judge’s lack of understanding and experience dealing with it was concerning. It just seems like they’re always battling over things that are common practice and standards across the country but the state is arguing against them and there’s hearings every couple of weeks. If there were more experienced prosecutors handling this case then I don’t think it would have made much more progress. It didn’t help that the judge couldn’t seem to make a ruling during court or even in a timely manner. I’ve never seen a court room ran quite like Judge Judges and I’ve seen a lot of cases.
@@Seashellsbytheseashore21 no I heard it but still all this move to this new courthouse is a good idea. The expert already did a lot of work done. These attorneys I was reading a motion because I like to read court documents and they want more funds and another expert. We spend a lot of of taxpayer on cases like this. The transition delays everything but is better to wait and have a trial not in a hurry then mess up the indictment. Because I like to see how the evidence presented. The new judge means business and let’s get on it.
Oooh, what a way for the judge to start, "Would like to tell you I'm happy to be here, but why start with an untruth." I hope that Ann Taylor respects this Court's admonitions.
who wants to be on a world famous trial that is gonna last three months? the judge and his whole families lives will be in the tabloids for years to come. remember judge ito, that was in the 90s and we still talk about him.
Stop complaining about how long it's taking when the families aren't bc they know it's a DP case & want to get it right, the first time. It's not a TV show, for your entertainment!!
While Ann Taylor was talking about all the expert witnesses and all the testimony that lies ahead, I was reminded of the novels of Charles Dickens where people would spend their days in court, and they would even die while the case was still ongoing. It is interesting that that has already happened in this case.
@sandibaker5298 oh my gosh did I miss the trial, where both sides witnesses and experts were called ??!! I had no idea he'd already been found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, my bad !!
You know I'm beginning to realise that there is this big pattern forming where defendants are behaving like super stars, making huge demands from the judges, shouting about what's fair and what they want to happen regarding their cases. Who do they think they are, and why are they getting 75% of what they demand? They may be innocent until proven guilty, but that still doesn't mean they deserve special treatment, theirs more than a 75% chance they will be proven guilty and they know they are guilty!! It's a mess
They’re relying & investing so much on a *mitigation expert* LOL! That says alot! His defense knows he is _guilty_ & preparing for a guilty verdict. And more focused on sentencing. Terrible news for Kohberger sitting there
i mean that's kind of normal though in a death penalty case. his defense believes he is innocent, however they must prepare for all outcomes otherwise they're not doing their job. are you unfamiliar with court cases of this magnitude? no snark, serious question.
@@Seashellsbytheseashore21 No I am not, prob much more familiar than you are. Not a snarky response. They are putting _extraordinary_ weight on this one mitigating expert, and somehow you don’t see that! Trials are about one stage at a time, especially w/ hearings. They can always schedule a penalty phase after the verdict & lawyers are given as much time as needed for it - are cases where sentencing is months after the verdict, not sure why they don’t do it here. If you know so much on criminal procedure then plz tell
@@Seashellsbytheseashore21 Oth if Brian is found NOT guilty then there is no work to be done & they’re wasting an enormous of time n effort & unnecessary delays for something that won’t come into play (sentencing)… but obviously they aren’t confident in that. Why? Cause his lawyers know the evidence. It’s mere *LOGIC* my friend.
WHAT’S up with guilty until proven innocent???🙄🙄 You believe shady cops & LYING media?? Are you privy to facts & evidence that no one else has???!! Ann is a damn good attorney! Usually public defenders are bottom of the barrel!
It’s bc everything she’s asking for is valid bc the prosecution isn’t doing their job. It shouldn’t take the prosecution 18 months to hand over discovery. That’s what was just said in this hearing. Bill Thompson just turned over the rest of the discovery right before this hearing. That’s inexcusable. Total waste of taxpayer dollars.
@AleshaBlythe I agree!! Seems like trials, justice is getting farther and farther away, lasting so long!! The one in Florida,Dan Markel,victim,,has been ten years since victim was murdered!! And not everyone involved has been arrested even!!
I want to thank NATE EATON with E IDAHO NEWS for bringing us this case !Your coverage has been really great with the coverage you have done on the LORI VALLOW DAYBELL case and CHAD DAYBELLs case !I know you will do just as good on this case! From AKRON, OHIO ❤❤😊😊
So trial length, including penalty phase but excluding jury selection and jury deliberations, estimated to be 13 weeks. It’s gonna be a long trial, and the jury sequestered for perhaps a month!! I think it’s going to be hard on jurors no matter when trial is held.
I wish the male prosecutor would shave his awesome beard. He is now in Boise and I think a jury from Boise will compare which attorneys look more professional. Defense attorneys look far more professional.
@WendyParmley. I agree with you about the beard. Beards make men look 20 years older than they are. They are also very unsanitary. All that hair on the face is just gross.
He was a mitigating expert, not a trial expert. Unfortunately, I think you might be on the wrong track here with your comment. Listen to The Lawyer You Know channel re: this hearing, and some of the differences will become more clear, along with much, much more. He’s fantastic.
I think the defense lawyers are being disingenuous when they act like having months to prepare isn’t enough time. Maybe they shouldn’t take on so many other cases if they can’t keep up with their workload.
I dont agree with offenders getting a change of venue! They should be on trial where the offense was committed! After all, the victims dont have any choices! If he's afraid of not getting a fair trial , you shouldn't have comitted the crime!
@@ez4me2sa I don’t know to which post you are referring but either way, you are extremely rude! You know nothing about the people who posted comments here, as to how much they know about this case. My guess is you are a troll. Have fun!
because he knows this is a process.. but he did want a fast extradition and waived a speedy trial and said he wanted to be exonerated in the beginning.
@@libbyworkman3459 when she stands to speak to the court, his head does a full tilt up towards her and his lips part. Otherwise he sits, lips closed with that dead fish stare 👀
Steve's brother is a cold blooded killer. Kristi wants kohberger not breathing anymore. No trial required. She also wanted to strangle Ann Taylor for defending bryans right to a suit. And alivea gave her partner a sound beating in a DV situation. Nice family😷
@@KerryCsongrady that’s very interesting because in America spelt is a kind of grain. I learn a lot by watching TH-cam videos and reading comments. Including yours.
After reading the affidavit and looking over the timestamps, etc. No one will convince me that he did it or that he acted alone. In my gut, I believe that the surviving roommates or at least one of them knows what really happened. For those who do not understand DNA, touch DNA Doesn’t necessarily mean that he was at the crime scene. Every time you open the door, you leave touch DNA. Your DNA is on grocery cards. And door handles. This guy was a heroin addict. At the house where those babies were murdered, was rumored to be a drug house. It’s not out of the realm of possibility that Kohberger knows the drug dealers. Remember, they found no blood, no hair, no fibers no nothing from the murder victims on him, inside his car, or inside his apartment . Something isn’t right.
I think they rushed to find "a car that seemed suspect and let's find a guy that drives that car". And the evidence withholding from the state is infuriating. I don't blame Ann Taylor at all for wanting the ENTIRE evidence file before allowing a trial to take place. The blame is on Judge Judge (previous). He could have set a deadline for the state. If state didn't meet the deadline then evidence should HAVE NOT been allowed to enter. PERIOD.
At least we have a judge that is not going to let the defense drag this out EVEN longer!!!!!!
Thank You East Idaho News for Airing/Streaming this Hearing.
Stop this nonsense and get these victims families to some level of justice.
Ann Taylor is hoping for September so that the jurors will rush through their decision just to get home to their families by Thanksgiving
She has had almost 2 years to be working on this
Hope this judge doesn’t give into the defense dragging their feet in getting prepared. This has been prolonged enough.
I also hope this judge makes the prosecution hand over all of the discovery that the defense has asked for like 16 times .
umm, the delay has not only been on the defense. the state has been withholding evidence as they just stated they gave it up in August.
Is the Judge the same one that Chad Daybell had?
@akat32928 no different judge, that was Judge Boyce
Defense has to prove a killer is innocent!
I can't believe this is going on almost 2 years for all those victims involved in this and we still have 6 months before the trial this is not fair to the victims he has had enough time
Not 6, try 12.
@@kathrynwitte3398 originally we'd be looking at 8 months. maybe 7 or maybe 11 now, we're at the end of sept.
The state needs to be more aggressive!
3 month trial? Ridiculous!
there are 4 victims. it's not ridiculous really. there's a ton of evidence to present, on both sides.
What "expert" couldn't finish their work in 6 months???
Seven months
@@MountainBather
RIGHT?! Absolutely ridiculous!
It’s not like they’re sitting around waiting for work. They have other clients.
What prosecutor takes 18 months to turn over discovery?
Bill Thompson.
Much of the defenses experts rely on the discovery. If Thompson took nearly 2 years to turn over the discovery then I think the real question here is why isn’t the prosecution turning over evidence in a timely fashion? He had to be ordered multiple times to provide the defense with evidence and the rest of the discovery. He only complied to the order JUST before this hearing.
The problem here is the prosecution. The defense hasn’t failed to turn over their evidence nor have they been given a deadline to do so.
It’s not a good look for the prosecution and only shows the the previous judge was lazy and took weeks to make decisions and in some instances not issuing a decision on motions. There are numerous motions he never even ruled on. I think this judge will whip this case into shape and we’ll see things actually getting accomplished or he’ll see that there’s some serious problems with the investigation and it’ll eventually get thrown out. The prosecution is looking embarrassing at this point
I like this judge already! He owns the courtroom unlike the judge in the Baldwin case.
Anne Taylor, this is not fair to the victims families. Get on with it lady.
She does not deserve everything she wants. She sucksss.
It’s NOT HER!!
It’s been impossible to find a fair jury!
I was ALL IN that he was prob guilty (but waiting for trial/evidence) but LOTS of info that points to his innocence.🤷♀️The police are soooo shady!!!
Soooo much sus!!!
It’s easy to want to blame Anne Taylor but that just shows that you havent been following this case closely so you aren’t aware of the facts of the case. That or you just aren’t sure how long it takes to bring a death penalty case to trial. Death penalty cases often take well over 2 years to make it to trial. There’s significantly more steps in the process that are required to happen during the trial.
First, DP cases have a mitigation phase where the defense has have mitigation experts look at certain factors that could impact the judges or juries decision on sentencing a defendant with the DP. That phase adds an additional one to two weeks to the length of a trial and sentencing. This is a requirement of the defense in all death penalty cases. If their expert passed away, then this is out of their control and it’s not a delay tactic to need additional time.
Second, if you go back to the end of the video and listen to this judge say that he will be responding to motion and making decisions quicker than they’re accustomed to typically less than 14 days. That should be your first clue that Anne Taylor couldn’t possibly be the problem for the delay in this case. JJJ said after his arrest he wanted to get this to trial and made it seem like it was imperative to have a trial but instead he’s dilly dallied around regarding every single motion ever filed. He couldn’t make a decision in court. Like ever. He always had to take advisement on motions and he took weeks to respond. Matter of fact, there are STILL motions JJJ hasn’t even made a ruling on and it’s been moved to another county. It’s embarrassing and it’s really a shame that we have people in jail awaiting trial and there’s judges like JJJ who are presiding over their case yet they carry on as if there’s no need to make decisions and get the ball rolling.
Last, you didn’t hear the judge asking the defense if they’ve met a deadline. He asked if the State had it complied with the deadline to turn over all of their evidence to the defense. Maybe you’re not up to speed on the happenings on this case but there have been repeated deadlines given to the State to turn over all of the discovery to the defense and they haven’t complied with ANY of them. There has not been one deadline placed on the defense due to them not doing what was asked of them. If you notice Thompson said he had met the deadline, conveniently JUST before this hearing so the defense hadn’t even had time to review it. The defense has consistently filed things last minute before hearings and even late in the day on a Friday. This December will be 24 months since Bryan’s arrest….there is no excuse for it to take the State approximately 18 months to turn over discovery to the defense.
Also, if you go back through the motions on the Idaho website, you’ll find Anne Taylor and the other defense counsel have all been on top of filing responses and motions. She’s stated in open court that her team is working strictly on the Kohberger case so I don’t think you’re aware of what’s going on in this case.
Anne Taylor isn’t the problem. You really have to pay attention to what’s not being said or done on this case. For instance, the state told JJJ back last year that the state was ready to go to trial in summer of 2023 if Bryan didn’t waive his right his right to a speedy trial. That’s absolute nonsense bc here it is September 2023 and he just turned over everything. If he claimed he was ready to go to trial in 2023 then what was the hold up on turning the complete discovery til now? Was he lying to the judge last year and not actually ready for a trial or has he been lying for the last year and purposely refusing to hand over all the discovery until now? You have to ask yourself why would the the prosecutor do that? He hasn’t said there’s been any other problem since he said he was ready. This is all backed up by hearings and court documents where you can verify that Bill Thompson and JJJ have both delayed delayed delayed while simultaneously claiming they want to get this trial. It’s wild but they do that bc they know the average person isn’t going to be looking through motions or watching entire hearings, they’re going to hear bits and pieces and assume he’s desperate to get things moving therefore the defense must the problem.
If you’re not up to speed on this case then you’re going to fully believe that Bryan Kohberger is guilty of this crime but in all seriousness, I implore you to really dig a bit into the facts of this case and I believe that you will start to change your opinion about whether or not the state has the right guy. In my opinion, they absolutely don’t have the right person. In the May hearing, Anne Taylor asked the lead investigator what specific evidence he relied on to arrest Bryan. officer Payne stated on the stand that he had reviewed this particular evidence and given it to the FBI to review and they worked together using that evidence to write the PCA to arrest Bryan.
The prosecution realized what the defense was asking about and they asked Officer Payne if he was aware he didn’t the he didn’t have that evidence in December when he wrote the PCA. He said he didn’t know? Jennings asked Payne if he was aware that that evidence wasn’t obtained until 8 months later in May? Payne said yes. That is him admitting he lied to have Bryan arrested.
There are many things that have since come to light showing the police were dishonest in this case. Anne Taylor has already stated in court that she was going to be filing a motion requesting a franks hearing. If you’re not familiar with a franks hearing is, it is a motion asking for the case to be dismissed due to police or LE lying in the evidence used to arrest the defendant. These are serious allegations and they’re rarely requested bc it’s not often that attorneys outright accuse LE of wrongdoing and misconduct. Franks Motion require the defense to provide evidence supporting their motion so it’s not something that’s filed with bogus or vague allegations. We’ve only seen it in the Delphi case but according to the defense they are working on a franks motion.
This case also went before a federal grand jury and they didn’t indict him. I’m sure you’ve heard people say a grand jury would indict a ham sandwich bc something like 90% of all cases put before a GJ will be indicted. That should tell you something if a federal GJ didn’t return an indictment.
This case doesn’t point to Bryan Kohberger once you dig into the facts of the case.
My personal opinion is that this case will get thrown out. This judge even said if this goes to trial. It’s possible it’s something he says in all cases but I believe this judge will throw the case out.
LE, the town of Moscow and Uni of Idaho NEEDED an arrest before students came back from Christmas break. They were losing students in droves. Students had left campus and were afraid to return opting for online classes instead. This was going to have a huge negative economic impact on the school and the city. Students account for 70% of the population or something like that so that’s some serious revenue during school sessions.
There’s more things that aren’t right in this case but my comment would be too long.
I would caution against trusting those in charge of this case and as they say follow the money. There’s been other cases in Idaho where they’ve wrongfully arrested people for murder like the Brian Drake murder. They arrested Dr Dan Moore and he was innocent. The judge threw that case out for violating his constitutional rights but if you check out Truth and Transparency’s videos on the case she’s went through the discovery and found reports where ISP officers were lying and hiding evidence.
They also illegally did the IGG which is why the prosecution says they aren’t using it. IGG is only to be used for cold cases and unsolved cases. If you look up the laws on this there are steps they have to take but the prosecutor is the only person who can authorize IGG testing on cases. I’m not sure how this case was allowed to go through. There truly a step by step process laid out on how to have IGG testing on a case. Tbh I’m thinking there was some illegal stuff going on with the LE using DNA in this case. I’m wondering if they didn’t turn over the suspect DNA to a lab or ancestory site illegally to try to determine whose dna it was then worked backwards.
There was a hearing where expert Gabriella Vargas testified. She is essentially the founder of the IGG process so she’s the leading expert on everything IGG. She “discovered” it and she has taught her method and it has since became its own industry or area of expertise in all the uses of DNA. She testified that she has been able to solve cases using her method and explained the limitations of genealogical dna. IGG doesn’t pinpoint a match and it’s takes someone going through for weeks to determine markers that match between very distant family members. The IGG process can only take you so far in finding family members and she testified to LE abusing the process to solve crimes. This was bombshell info. Very serious because the higher courts have ruled on the use of IGG methods. They’re to be limited to cold cases, unsolved cases that have exhausted all other investigative techniques AND that DNA and dna profiles, etc even profiles used for genealogical purposes is Constitutionally protected. So LE were only allowed to access profiles of DNA that had opted IN to allow LE use their genealogical link in solving cases. However Ms Vargas’ testimony was that had first hand knowledge that LE were illegally accessing even the users who had opted OUT of LE use. She gave the process and explained
How they were still using opted out profiles and doing it without getting caught and figuring out who the suspect was and basically then they could try to work the case to fit the suspect. Her testimony as an expert for the defense should tell you how LE didn’t handle things right in this case. There were laws put in place on this bc DNA has become so advanced that it almost shoots itself in the foot. Now we have touch dna that is left so easily that it could implicate the wrong person for a crime. Take the Jon Benet Ramsey case years ago. They had dna testing on her undies and dna came back from worker on China or Vietnam I can’t recall exactly where but it was overseas. That’s how easily it can get on anything you touch.
DNA seems absolute and all well and good until we get to a case like that or in this case someone who wasn’t in or around the area to commit the crime. His dna could’ve been passed from touching a door that the actual killer touched and been transferred to the knife. I personally don’t think that’s how it happened bc ONLY his dna was on the knife not even the victims or the actual killer. Which doesn’t make sense. Anne Taylor said in the beginning that the knife sheath was placed at the scene. That’s a serious accusation and bold.
Anyways, the IGG process was abused in this process. The prosecution wants to make that go away by saying they’re not using the IGG in trial. It’s bc they know they weren’t legally allowed to use it and someone used it anyway. I personally believe it was the FBI. Vargas also stated her method uses the databases like 23 and Me, etc and that LE can access those too illegally. I’m sure you’ve heard recently about ALL the board members resigning from 23 and Me? There’s some serious things going to come up about LE and DNA. Sit back and watch. We’re going to find out eventually that LE have been doing this for years under our noses and it’s going to be massive. It’s all just starting to come to light.
It’s also in court documents that the FBI turned in a tip that consisted only of two words - Bryan Kohberger’s name. Why would the FBI give this information through a tip line? They were working on the case side by side with MPD, ISP and Latah County. There’s too many inconsistencies. Things aren’t adding up as the case moves on. If they’ve used IGG in current cases and gotten away with it, my guess is they got lucky on past cases where their suspect was actually the right guy and despite using illegal tactics to find their guy, they were able to work the facts and evidence around so they could legally arrest the suspect. They tried to do that in this case but everything’s falling through bc he isn’t actually the killer. Their dirty tactics and lies are being exposed bc they’re having to show their work and their work ain’t adding up. This is why lawmakers put limitations on using IGG. They predicted this could happen. Test dna instead of working the investigation and following where the facts and evidence take you. Someone else’s dna could implicate the wrong person. I think that’s exactly what’s happened in this case.
They also had Sy Ray as an expert in cellular data and he said LE filed a warrant on Bryan’s phone to track him but he didn’t understand why they did that because he said according to the reports he had LE were actually monitoring his movements so it was really disingenuous to tell the courts they needed it to track him when they knew exactly where he was. Sy Ray has testified in hundreds of cases because he to created one of the programs used for tracking cell phone data. When he’s on the stand saying their reports are incomplete and he didn’t know how they got to Bryan based on the reports they turned over. It’s bc Payne lied in the PCA and didn’t have those reports at the time. It’s also important to note that Sy Ray has NEVER testified for the defense as long as he’s been doing this. He also doesn’t charge for his testimony. He doesn’t make money to testify as an expert. I think that says a lot about his credibility.
LE in this case are untrustworthy. When an LE officer lies in court under oath or in legal documents nothing they say from that point forward can be trusted. More lies will come out and it’s really unfortunate bc that means the real killer is still out there.
Also i have a video on my channel from the hearing where the prosecution and Payne admit to not having the evidence he says he had in the PCA.
I hope more people come aware of the inconsistencies in this case and call these LE out on their unscrupulous conduct. It’s bad in Idaho.
@@roxdarmurray6634 29:00 His team relying & investing entirely on a *mitigation expert* LOL ..this says alot! His defense knows he is _guilty_ & preparing for a guilty verdict. And more focused on sentencing. Terrible news for Kohberger sitting there
filming is so much better than in chad daybells
Hope it’s the same as this for the trial.
Daybell’s filming was pointless!
So in person finally….about time.
Thank you,East idaho news and Nate Eaton😊
The delays for trial of Kolegurger are as bad and delayed as that of Sarah Boone.
Hers is delayed because she has done theough so many lawyers, this case has been delayed so many times because the prosecution has not handed over full discovery , very different circumstances
@@johannawigg6921Anne Taylor is stalling cuz she fears the truth will come out. She fears the big day!!! U just wanna be Kohberger’s bf 😂
Where are the 3 males DNA??
3 attorneys on the case and they still won’t be ready in May? WTH?
Well, let’s see… How about 100s of material they’ve been trying to get out of the prostitution!! 😂😂😂😂😂 who has F’ed up????
First was changing venue and she keeps dragging the trial because of experts . What is it she wants 2026 really. I like this judge that wants to be on time.
It’s not the defense. The state has not complied with deadline after deadline. I went to the website that has all of the filings in this case and I haven’t read every single document yet, I did read all of the motions and responses from each side.
I could not find one deadline that the defense didn’t meet. They have had their case completed by the deadlines agreed upon or the ones the judge ordered.
However, I have seen numerous deadlines that the state missed and would say they would comply by another date and they didn’t comply. The judge eventually ordered a couple of deadlines that they complied with on the very last day. One of which they responded at 4:45p on a Friday.
It’s not a good look for the prosecution at all. The state only fully complied with the deadline to turn over the rest of the discovery just before this hearing.
I try to look at the facts on both sides and honestly the state isn’t looking good at all.
I’ve lost a lot on trust in them after the previous hearing where the state admitted that the lead investigator lied in the PCA. They’re aware the lead investigator lied during the investigation and it looked like they were trying to help the investigator during his testimony by asking him leading questions bc he was lying during cross examination by the defense.
Towards the end of Officer Brett Payne’s testimony the defense was asking Payne about search warrants he applied for in December for cell phone data. They asked him when did he get the defendant’s cell phone records back from the cell phone company? He said he applied for the search warrant and the company sent them on the same day.
He wrote in the PCA that both he and the FBI reviewed them and decided to write another search warrant for 60 days worth of his phone records. He said the judge signed it and he sent that to the phone company. He said the company sent him the rest of the phone records and again he and the FBI reviewed the phone records still all on the same day. He said he used a program on the computer to make a map to track his location then the FBI entered all the required info from the cell phone records into their CAST program to track the defendant’s movements using the pings so he used that as a reference to make his own map of his movements. He said he did all these things in the same day.
The defense asked him where are the search warrant returns for those phone records? Because every time they get something due to a search warrant, it is documented and filed like motions and orders so it becomes a legal filing.
Search warrant returns weren’t filed in December indicating cell phone records were search warrant returns.
The defense told Brett Payne the only search warrant returns filed were in May. The search warrant return says it was for the 2 December search warrants. However he continued to say AT&T actually sent them on that day in December.
Later, the prosecution asks Brett Payne
“Are you aware that you did not receive any cell phone data in December?
He answered “I’m not sure.”
Then she asked
“Are you aware that you did not receive ANY search warrants until May of 2023?”
He answered “yes.”
It goes back to the defense and they ask
“If you wrote in the PCA that you had Brian’s cell phone records back in December but you didn’t, why would you lie?”
He answered “I just wrote what they told me to write.”
I was shocked. Not only did the lead investigator lie in the arrest affidavit and open court but even prosecution is aware. I have a real problem with that. In addition to local LE using a new officer to lead this investigation. I still can’t wrap my head around that. Payne had been at MPD for 2 years it seems a seasoned, experienced detective would be crucial for a quadruple murder. I’m not judging, I’m just trying to understand the department’s choice to put him on this case especially considering this area doesn’t have murders often.
I’ve found some other things that appear to be untrue and even where it appears they were tracking the defendant’s phone during a time that wasn’t allowed in the search warrant.
The part where Brett Payne said that the defendants cell phone had not pinged on towers near the murder scene since the murder. They didn’t have a search warrant that allowed them to track his phone up to the date of the PCA. I’m thinking he put that in there without realizing he was admitting in court documents that they were still tracking his phone despite the court order not covering the dates after November 14th.
I know those don’t seem like a huge deal but if the police will lie during their investigation or lie to arrest somebody then it ruins their credibility.
Anyway, I understand where it looks like the defense is frequently making requests for different things but from what I can tell it’s due to the state dragging their feet and the defense wastes so much time writing and filing motions asking the court to compel the state to comply. There was a significant amount of time wasted due to the state argument against the experts polling the community. The state filed a motion to block the polling on a Friday afternoon at 4:45p. The judge filed a motion minutes after receiving it ordering all polling to stop and they had to wait to have a hearing and the defense had to bring in the polling experts two weeks later. All of that time was wasted that both sides weren’t working on the case. Polling community for bias is a common practice in the legal system. The state and the judge’s lack of understanding and experience dealing with it was concerning.
It just seems like they’re always battling over things that are common practice and standards across the country but the state is arguing against them and there’s hearings every couple of weeks. If there were more experienced prosecutors handling this case then I don’t think it would have made much more progress. It didn’t help that the judge couldn’t seem to make a ruling during court or even in a timely manner. I’ve never seen a court room ran quite like Judge Judges and I’ve seen a lot of cases.
i think you missed where an expert died.
@@Seashellsbytheseashore21 no I heard it but still all this move to this new courthouse is a good idea. The expert already did a lot of work done. These attorneys I was reading a motion because I like to read court documents and they want more funds and another expert. We spend a lot of of taxpayer on cases like this. The transition delays everything but is better to wait and have a trial not in a hurry then mess up the indictment. Because I like to see how the evidence presented. The new judge means business and let’s get on it.
🙏🙏🙏 for Truth and Justice, truth for Idaho 4 victims and families. Truth real perpetrators are held accountable 🙏🙏🙏🙏
Oooh, what a way for the judge to start, "Would like to tell you I'm happy to be here, but why start with an untruth." I hope that Ann Taylor respects this Court's admonitions.
who wants to be on a world famous trial that is gonna last three months? the judge and his whole families lives will be in the tabloids for years to come. remember judge ito, that was in the 90s and we still talk about him.
Who's paying for all these experts? Ty
The state of Idaho, thanks to your tax dollars at work. The public defender's office is a state agency.
The state of Idaho. N
IMO, Ms Taylor will do anything to keep delaying this trial.
She knows she’s got no case
@@JacquelineBurton-ro3vqWRONG
Absolutely no case.
Stop complaining about how long it's taking when the families aren't bc they know it's a DP case & want to get it right, the first time. It's not a TV show, for your entertainment!!
Love your answer.
While Ann Taylor was talking about all the expert witnesses and all the testimony that lies ahead, I was reminded of the novels of Charles Dickens where people would spend their days in court, and they would even die while the case was still ongoing. It is interesting that that has already happened in this case.
He seems like a no nonsense kind of judge. Good!!!
This is why people have such a hard time with Defense attorneys. They never have enough time..whine whine whine…
And where did you get your data?? That's a broad statement without proof.
A suit does not make a man Khoeberger.
You spelled his name wrong
@@johannawigg6921😂😂
Agree. NOTHING will make this monster a man.
@@johannawigg6921
WHO CARES?
@sandibaker5298 oh my gosh did I miss the trial, where both sides witnesses and experts were called ??!! I had no idea he'd already been found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, my bad !!
The new judge doesn't play, 👍🏼
13:29
WHY is the brunette defense council smiling???
It's repulsive.
Soooo da*n ready for this trial and for the dp on this dude
You know I'm beginning to realise that there is this big pattern forming where defendants are behaving like super stars, making huge demands from the judges, shouting about what's fair and what they want to happen regarding their cases.
Who do they think they are, and why are they getting 75% of what they demand?
They may be innocent until proven guilty, but that still doesn't mean they deserve special treatment, theirs more than a 75% chance they will be proven guilty and they know they are guilty!! It's a mess
Entitlement seems to be a big problem lately.
Yes!👏🏻
Sarah Boone comes to mind.
Ridiculousness!
Gosh you are so right. Unfortunately we are seeing this trend and it needs to be addressed. These local elections are important for this reason.
99.9% he’s found guilty. No one gets off on a quadruple murder charge.. never happened in judicial history
09:44 it begins- you’re welcome
Can’t wait until he is locked up forever 🎉🎉🎉
This judge seems much better than the previous one
They’re relying & investing so much on a *mitigation expert* LOL! That says alot! His defense knows he is _guilty_ & preparing for a guilty verdict. And more focused on sentencing. Terrible news for Kohberger sitting there
i mean that's kind of normal though in a death penalty case. his defense believes he is innocent, however they must prepare for all outcomes otherwise they're not doing their job. are you unfamiliar with court cases of this magnitude? no snark, serious question.
@@Seashellsbytheseashore21 No I am not, prob much more familiar than you are. Not a snarky response. They are putting _extraordinary_ weight on this one mitigating expert, and somehow you don’t see that! Trials are about one stage at a time, especially w/ hearings. They can always schedule a penalty phase after the verdict & lawyers are given as much time as needed for it - are cases where sentencing is months after the verdict, not sure why they don’t do it here. If you know so much on criminal procedure then plz tell
@@Seashellsbytheseashore21 Oth if Brian is found NOT guilty then there is no work to be done & they’re wasting an enormous of time n effort & unnecessary delays for something that won’t come into play (sentencing)… but obviously they aren’t confident in that. Why? Cause his lawyers know the evidence.
It’s mere *LOGIC* my friend.
What’s with Ann Taylor smiling all the time? Get over it, Ann!
Yeah...that's weird ....and next to her, he sleeps😂
It’s so creepy. I’d be like what’s up w these people. How they present themselves alone just looks unnerving and crooked.
WHAT’S up with guilty until proven innocent???🙄🙄
You believe shady cops & LYING media??
Are you privy to facts & evidence that no one else has???!!
Ann is a damn good attorney! Usually public defenders are bottom of the barrel!
You're jealous.
The way he stares at his blonde attorney while she speaks gives me the creeps. 😮
So sick of Taylor wanting everything her way she’s already had 90% of rulings in her favour and she’s still pushing her luck
She’s a joke!
It’s bc everything she’s asking for is valid bc the prosecution isn’t doing their job. It shouldn’t take the prosecution 18 months to hand over discovery. That’s what was just said in this hearing. Bill Thompson just turned over the rest of the discovery right before this hearing. That’s inexcusable.
Total waste of taxpayer dollars.
You have NO idea what you're talking about.
@@ez4me2sa ohhhhh ok 👌
@@ez4me2sa you probably think he’s innocent lmao
No special privileges! What he’s accused of deems him a threat to public safety and security.
NEVER, ever serve on any jury. In fact, you'd be kicked out
@AleshaBlythe I agree!! Seems like trials, justice is getting farther and farther away, lasting so long!! The one in Florida,Dan Markel,victim,,has been ten years since victim was murdered!! And not everyone involved has been arrested even!!
What a colossal waste of money
Im so sick of AT and her excuses. Stall stall stall..come on judge, have some backbone!..
It's obvious you've never researched or paid any attention to this case.
Steve Hippler (Judge) is a total jerk in real life.
Most men are…
No they aren't. You're a jerk.
I've never seen a State drag their feet before actually starting a trial like Idaho!
I want to thank NATE EATON with E IDAHO NEWS for bringing us this case !Your coverage has been really great with the coverage you have done on the LORI VALLOW DAYBELL case and CHAD DAYBELLs case !I know you will do just as good on this case! From AKRON, OHIO ❤❤😊😊
I'm really scared that the prosecution might be outmatched.
So trial length, including penalty phase but excluding jury selection and jury deliberations, estimated to be 13 weeks. It’s gonna be a long trial, and the jury sequestered for perhaps a month!! I think it’s going to be hard on jurors no matter when trial is held.
36:43
This is frigging ridiculous!
I wish the male prosecutor would shave his awesome beard. He is now in Boise and I think a jury from Boise will compare which attorneys look more professional. Defense attorneys look far more professional.
@WendyParmley. I agree with you about the beard. Beards make men look 20 years older than they are. They are also very unsanitary. All that hair on the face is just gross.
Anne Taylor smiling like this is a game! I SEE YOU 👀 😂😂😂
It is disgusting! Perhaps this won't work in her favor.
Looks like he got his suit to wear..
@@MicheleoneL-w8j that's not true
It began at 9 minutes!
If we do research for like DNA experts who recently died we can figure out their angle
He was a mitigating expert, not a trial expert. Unfortunately, I think you might be on the wrong track here with your comment. Listen to The Lawyer You Know channel re: this hearing, and some of the differences will become more clear, along with much, much more. He’s fantastic.
New judge is gonna get this trial moving he talks about hours in every day get it done!
25:07
I don’t think Ann Taylor will EVER be ready.
The victims deserve justice and this travesty has dragged out too long already!
I think the defense lawyers are being disingenuous when they act like having months to prepare isn’t enough time. Maybe they shouldn’t take on so many other cases if they can’t keep up with their workload.
I dont agree with offenders getting a change of venue! They should be on trial where the offense was committed! After all, the victims dont have any choices! If he's afraid of not getting a fair trial , you shouldn't have comitted the crime!
Innocent until proven guilty. If you were in his shoes, you could want the same.
You are completely clueless, and have not even researched or paid any attention to the case.
@@ez4me2sa I don’t know to which post you are referring but either way, you are extremely rude! You know nothing about the people who posted comments here, as to how much they know about this case. My guess is you are a troll. Have fun!
You are right it happened in their community and needs to be handled there. He may regret this.
i think you missed where he hasn't been convicted of the crime. welcome to the united states of america.
Start 9:59
3 months omg
why isn’t he in hand cuffs
He is most probably in shackles.
Oddly, KB is not in any hurry to prove his innocence, either to a jury or his youtuber fan club and their subscribers.
because he knows this is a process.. but he did want a fast extradition and waived a speedy trial and said he wanted to be exonerated in the beginning.
I think Brian is smitten with his blond defense attorney .
@carolyn9444 Body language says a lot, and they do seem to be sitting fairly close together.
@@libbyworkman3459 when she stands to speak to the court, his head does a full tilt up towards her and his lips part.
Otherwise he sits, lips closed with that dead fish stare 👀
Draw! Without drawing! 😂😂😂😂😂
Steve's brother is a cold blooded killer. Kristi wants kohberger not breathing anymore. No trial required. She also wanted to strangle Ann Taylor for defending bryans right to a suit. And alivea gave her partner a sound beating in a DV situation. Nice family😷
Wow they still let him dress up.
The defense sure has to work hard for a guy they say is innocent.
State is ready to go! The burden is on them not the defense.
State is not ready. They just gave all the evidence over.
East Idaho News you have spelt Bryan's name incorrectly
@KerryCsongrady. *spelled
@@libbyworkman3459 in Australia it's spelt
@@KerryCsongrady that’s very interesting because in America spelt is a kind of grain. I learn a lot by watching TH-cam videos and reading comments. Including yours.
@@libbyworkman3459 actually both ways are correct, but in Australia it's spelt🩷
Ya Ann
After reading the affidavit and looking over the timestamps, etc. No one will convince me that he did it or that he acted alone. In my gut, I believe that the surviving roommates or at least one of them knows what really happened.
For those who do not understand DNA, touch DNA Doesn’t necessarily mean that he was at the crime scene. Every time you open the door, you leave touch DNA. Your DNA is on grocery cards. And door handles. This guy was a heroin addict. At the house where those babies were murdered, was rumored to be a drug house. It’s not out of the realm of possibility that Kohberger knows the drug dealers.
Remember, they found no blood, no hair, no fibers no nothing from the murder victims on him, inside his car, or inside his apartment . Something isn’t right.
I agree
I think they rushed to find "a car that seemed suspect and let's find a guy that drives that car". And the evidence withholding from the state is infuriating. I don't blame Ann Taylor at all for wanting the ENTIRE evidence file before allowing a trial to take place. The blame is on Judge Judge (previous). He could have set a deadline for the state. If state didn't meet the deadline then evidence should HAVE NOT been allowed to enter. PERIOD.
Just the whole handling of the investigation was off from the start. Even the pca doesn't make sense.
Space cadets 😂😂😂 Straight up.
@@Chaseh1616 yeah we think the same of you
Brain dead is guilty
God he’s a creepy looking guy
The judge?
Yes, the judge is.