Rayman DS vs. Rayman 3D (Rayman 2 DS vs. 3DS) | Side by Side
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ก.ย. 2024
- Side by side comparison between the Nintendo DS and 3DS versions of Rayman 2. Both versions were emulated in HD.
Support the channel on Patreon: / neogamertvga
Y’know something…it’s amazing how the Nintendo DS is capable of remaking some specific and surprising n64 remade games into a portable device. And making new fresh and original 3D games that were surprisingly interesting like Metroid prime hunter
3ds did the same thing
@@e.estime3745 oh yeah with starfox64.
Ds was always way less impressive than psp
@@budal15 PSP didn't have any Rayman games
@@nguyengamer7906 True, I never claimed it did. I just noted that DS was a fairly weak system when it released. It's capabilities and games were weaker than Ps1. Sorta like Ps0.8 or N60. Heck, it couldn't properly run Rayman 2. Meanwhile Psp could be called (powerwise) Ps1.7 as many games were close to their Ps2 counterparts
I've played this game so many times. Had both the ps1 disc and the n64 cartridge. The art style holds up as well as the wind waker one, it will never look bad.
Ds version is based on the n64 version and 3ds version is based on the dreamcast version
Como lo sabes
Respondeme
@@MEROX_13812 por el apartado grafico
This port was ahead of it's time, it's impressive how literally everything is the same including the physics, the DS was waaay more hardware limited than the 3DS, impressive port to say the least
i remember playing Rayman 3D in 2011 😭
Omg i like the ds in this one like they used a cutscene animation not just a picture with text on it impressive tbh!! :0 ♡
somehow, the ds one manages to look better
....How exactly? DS version is the poorest of the ports imo even n64 looked better. I think the DS version was a rush job honestly.
@thorwilhelms9635 DS version is both i recently played it. You cant hardly go a minute without texture issues and the frames dropping into sub 10s. 3Ds has a horrible audio and animation issues. Lags constantly and has broken textures. Both are horrible versions but DS is the worst.
This is such a rare case of video game ports
The DS version is based off the N64 version and the 3ds the Dreamcast version.
3ds one is based on the ps2 version.
The dreamcast has the same models as the n64/ps1 version.
@Richter WLK It's not based on the PS2 version as the level select screen isn't a open hub like on PS2. It's like the Dreamcast one. And it also has the level layout of the Dreamcast and voice work. PS2 has people voicing the characters, Dreamcast has gibberish and so does the 3ds have gibberish language. Dreamcast had higher quality textures, environments and character models. These are what were used in the 3ds port.
@@WllKiedSnake every rayman game on a nintendo console will be based on rayman 2 for the n64 (which you would call the "not-voiced" versions). What they did for the 3ds version and future releases was use the models/shaders from the ps2 version.
Go back and check the dreamcast one to see how polygonal rayman's nose looks and compare it to the 3ds.
@Richter WLK The only features the 3DS version does not have is the Dreamcast mini games. And it is based off the Dreamcast version. You can go look up comparisons. I have just a few minutes ago. Looks like the Dreamcast version.
@@Rihcterwilkersure they might sue the models but everything else is djfferent and more similar to the dreamcast version
Somehow I prefer the DS version. Its more minimal and grimmy. 3DS is way too colorful compared to the original games and compared to the tone of the game as well.
On original hardware, the DS version is too slow.
the idea of rayman's hair/ears in 3D version not being just flat textures maxes it the most definitive version of the rayman model visually to me. - the animations cuz they are wierd tho
I prefer ds version that game scared me when i was a kid
The 3ds version is how I first played rayman 2
I remember my mom bought it for me at target
I remember this game i was in some office playing as a kid but then lost the game ?
If you remove the enhancements, the DS Version is pretty ugly along with a choppy frame rate.
Yeah, the DS version runs like garbage. It'll drop as low as 5fps while running up against a wall and shooting energy balls. Collision detection is also botched, you can easily get stuck and fall through the floor. Worse still, the input lag is horrendous. It's based on the N64 version, which had its own share of framerate drops common to that system, but the DS version is far worse. Texture quality took a massive hit too. DS already lacks the ability to filter textures, but a ton of the textures were also made lower resolution on top of this. It's a horrible port. Even the considerably stripped back and abbreviated PS1 version is arguably preferable.
The 3DS version also runs really poor considering it's an almost exact port of the Dreamcast version, and on substantially better hardware. The DC version runs at a silky smooth locked 60fps throughout (except for the level select). 3DS version doesn't dip quite as low as the DS version, but it still rarely manages to hit 60fps, usually only managing to reach into the 40s at most and frequently dips below 30 and even 20. Controls and collision is fine at least, though there are a lot of visual and audio glitches and they removed a bunch of the lighting effects.
Only the 3ds version because there are at least some familiar details there
esse rayman do ds,foi lançado em 2004,junto com o console,ou seja,os desenvolvedores fizeram as pressas,pra mostrar o poder do console.
Why the _fuck_ were there so many versions of this game
Rayman DS is a very awful ds port and i going to talk, why this port sucks.
1. Minor false advertising: This is a port of Rayman 2, yet Rayman's modern design (from Rayman 3 and onwards) is used on the front of the cover.
2. It doesn't offer anything new to the table aside from the new touch controls.
3. As stated above, there are multiple technical issues, with two examples being the encounter with Umber and in the flower ride in the Sanctuary of Rock and Lava, where Rayman can slip off, even during Umber's cinematic, and the giant spider at the beginning of the Tomb of the Ancients will disappear a few seconds after the cutscene in which it first appears.
4. The graphics aren't touched up on, which makes the game appear dated.
5. The textures are much more jagged due to the DS lacking a texture filtering system (the textures themselves are unchanged, however).
6. You can only change Rayman's speed by using the touch screen controls.
Both versions are bad in their own way. The 3DS version is missing lighting completely along with other effects, and still runs like shit (when the Dreamcast version ran at 60 FPS at all times). Not to mention the 1000th lum is inaccessible without using glitches because the spiderweb trampoline does not work properly, and even when you do access it the game will softlock and you will have to exit the level.
@@legoclayface i picked texts on a crappy games wiki page
@@legoclayface I'm curious how the spiderweb trampoline effect got removed and why the 1000th lum glitches the game. The game is a pretty faithful port of the Dreamcast version, minus the multiplayer aspects, otherwise.
@@EuroMIX2 Bad programming, that's how. Yes the 3DS version is indeed based on the Dreamcast version, but it's a graphically-downgraded, choppy, shitty port, when the 3DS could have done much better as it's a bit more powerful than the Dreamcast (but not as powerful as the PS2).
will the ds one works on a 3ds (will it also look how it does on the ds
Yes, the 3DS is back compatible with original DS games. They'll appear a bit blurrier since the 3DS scales them up to fit the higher res screen, though you can also hold the start button while booting the DS games and it will run it in a smaller window without the blur.
@@granvillimus thankyou so much🙏 and thanks for the reply
Character models are too light and overexposed on the 3DS.
agree, wierd choice