I’ve listened to the 2-hour Crime, Torts, and Contracts videos a handful of times each. Come exam time I wouldn’t be surprised if your voice pops into my head like a legal Jimminy Cricket. Thanks for making these subjects accessible! YDM
Thanks for this mate. I listen to these (with my phone in the glovebox - not watching!) in the car and it's hugely useful to brush up on crim. Your work here is highly appreciated.
Hey Anthony. I just wanted to say thank you for your work on this channel. I watched many of your videos before going to law school in QLD. So far, I've got three 6s and a 7. I'm doing Criminal Law next semester so I'm going to re-watch this video as a primer. Keep up the great work!
Hey thanks so much! You have no idea how much I love knowing that my teaching goes out to African countries, where resources might otherwise be limited. I wish you the very very best!
I am just about to start Criminal Law and honestly this is amazing! Thank you!! Also loved the others. Definitely helped me pass my legal institutions course with a Distinction!!!!
Hey Dr. M., I enjoyed your content as a first year, and I still do. As an American student competing in the ICC's moot court competition, it's fascinating to see criminal law dissected in different jurisdictions. Keep on it!
@@afdlink what does ‘jurisdiction’ mean, exactly? I looked it up and it says that it means ‘authority’ but people use the word jurisdiction in so many different contexts and it’s a little confusing. Can you pls explain with some examples Google isn’t helping lol
@@cheechee6473 Hey Gellert, (and Prof. M. if you'd like to correct me) by "jurisdiction" I mean where/when/why a court can exercise judicial authority over a situation. Oftentimes, jurisdictions are divided into the subject matter (what kinds of dispute can a court rule on), personality (who can a court's decision bind), and territory (what geographic boundaries limit a court's authority). But to my comment in particular, I mean the difference between United States law (where I'm a student) and Aussie law. Both legal traditions arose from British imperial interpretation of common law, but developed differently in the American jurisdictions, U.S. law applied to U.S. personsin the territory of the U.S. and the Australian ones (likewise, but for the territories and persons of Australia). Hope that helps. Or, if not, Prof. M. can step in and set us straight. Good luck!
I found this video quite late but I must say this video is incredibly helpful, thank you! I have my work experience with a criminal defence firm in 7 days and this video is a godsend.
These videos have been a great resource for me in deciding whether or not I would like to study law. I've found the content of these videos to be fascinating, and I will be applying to law schools this year!
Fantastic content Anthony! I am studying in a non-code state but this was incredibly useful in contextualising the framework of criminal law and in which it all lies..Great Job :)
The way you teach is just amazing by breaking down the whole section helped me to learn easily and made me more motivated to study Laws of Australia. Thanks it was a great help for me :) .You should make video on Civil Procedure and other laws.
@@AnthsLawSchool Thanks Anthony! At the end of this semester, I have one more year to go. Currently sitting on a High Distinction average and can't believe how quickly it has all gone!
U ARE a GODSEND! I heard ur lecture on torts and it actually saved me in my final exams. There was a question I didn’t know was going to come up in the exam. But I was able to “marinac” it! In other words - without ur teaching anthony we’d be scre%#ed!! Thank u for being an incredible teacher and for being accessible to us around the globe!
Though I graduated from University of Canberra in 2011,and still residing in the same area, I acknowledged you as an expert Law lecturer though there are few areas of Criminal law, which differs depend on the jurisdiction in Australia. Your videos are really good for revision. I tried to search for ACT&NSW Criminal law experts' videos on TH-cam, but I couldn't find the best as yours.
Hey, thanks so much. You are right, criminal law in the ACT is much closer in format to the Commonwealth Criminal Code, and criminal law in NSW is mostly common law, supplemented by the Crimes Act. This video is mostly focused on Queensland, but the concepts are generally applicable. Cheers!
Hi again Anthony, thanks again for all your great content-really helped me to hit the ground running with studies. I just had a query regarding self defence if you had a moment? Up until 2005, self defence was defined in common Law, and then specified in The Crimes Acts of the Commonwealth, states and territories, including the recent reforms to the Vic Crimes Act. From my understanding the self defence definition in the acts was based on common law-Zecevic particularly. Does this therefore mean, that these past cases( Zecevic, Viro etc) are mentioned only as obiter Dictum during a trial now, and that ultimately any decision has to be taken in line with the Act. Just having some difficulty getting my head around how Common Law and Statute exist in practice simultaneously? Thank-you and totally understand if you don't have the time to answer. Kind regards Jase
Hi Jase, This is a great question. When a common law principle - in this case self-defence - is codified in a statute, the task of the court changes. Instead of declaring the common law, the task of the court is now to *interpret the statute*. So the starting point is the words of the statute. However, when interpreting the statute, the court is absolutely allowed to refer to the common law which came before the court, in order to understand the statute. So, if the statute basically just implements the common law without making any conceptual changes, the court will absolutely continue to rely on those earlier cases - but it is relying on those cases in order to assist the court to properly interpret the statute. The cases are no longer the authority - the statute is the authority - but if the statute really just reflects those cases, it would be silly to stop referring to them. After all, case judgments are usually far more detailed and nuanced that statute could ever be, and cases are addressed o an individual incident, while statute must be addressed to the whole population for the whole future. Does that make sense? The prior cases don't become irrelevant - they become tools for properly understanding and interpreting the statute. Hope that helps! Anthony
@@AnthsLawSchool That's fantastic Anthony and really cleared up my understanding of how Common law relates to Statute. Really appreciate you taking the time to discuss this in such understandable detail. Thanks again Kind regards Jase
Hi Anthony, thanks so much for your great lectures. As a law student nearing the end of my degree and working in law, it's really helpful to have these refreshers. My dad is a lecturer and I showed him your videos. He would like to know what software and/or process you use to make these 'law in 2 hours' videos. He think's it great and would love to do something similar with having the text coming up in the background while he speaks to camera. Any chance you could shed some light on the process?
Hi Bec, sorry it has taken me so long to get back to you. I use iMovie to make the videos, and I just use powerpoint to create the graphic screens, then save them as PDFs. My main tips are to invest in a good quality mic, some good lighting (it's cheap on sites like Amazon) and a decent camera. The actual process is not nearly as complicated as one might imagine :)
Anthony always love your top up cramming videos over exam period. Funny reference to Tones and I, and really glad you took consideration and warning for your viewers at the sexual elements component. Thanks again
@@AnthsLawSchoolI wrote first comment before exam. Funny enough my crim law exam was on sexual offences. I passed thanks to your top up. On a side note: my copy of 'Learning Law' ironically got stolen last year from my doorstep. lol
That's a great ambition Ivan - very best of luck! Keep your eye on the channel, I have a bunch of criminal law and evidence cases coming along which ought to be of interest to you too :)
It would be nice to hear about criminal law at the commonwealth level, and how that works. Including the entering of international treaties etc. Is it an Australian crime, by treaty, prosected by the commonwealth, to bribe a foreign government official, or say an official of the WTO? And I notice terrorism wasn't touched on, I believe that part of criminal law at the state and federal levels is very strict (i.e. intending to plan an act of terror- not just planning it- is an offence with big penalties). And those other strict liability ones, like entering a declared war zone (Syria for example), is just being there a crime? Great video :)
Hi Dylan, glad you liked the video! I will eventually do a video on Commonwealth Crimes, but it's down the list a bit. Bribing a foreign official is a Commonwealth crime in the Criminal Code though. There are no criminal offences in Australia which rely entirely on treaty law. You're right that I didn't touch on terrorism offences, but in reality they are hardly ever charged, and not usually part of the undergraduate curriculum. There's a bunch of other offences that I didn't include either ... or it would have been Criminal Law in Sixteen Hours lol All the best!
Thank you so much - and particularly for the last comment. I put a lot of thought into how to deliver that quite difficult material, so I really value that feedback. Cheers!
Hi Mike, criminal law is still not standard across the states. Is the Four Corners episode still on iView? I'd be happy to check it out and give you a response.
Absolutely. I remember cases by their facts, based on a sentence beginning "The one where ..." So, Carlill v Carbolic is "The one where Mrs Carlill used the smoke ball and got sick anyway" Hadley v Baxendale is "The one where the mill needed a new shaft" And so on. Those little stories are MUCH easier to remember than the case names. Hope that helps!
My pleasure! I'm learning all the time about how to make these videos - I know more about law than about technology! Having said that, plenty of people will tell you I look better blurry lol
Professor Anthony marinac I took your advice and attended a court for further education interesting interesting indeed. I found that the person that was assaulted lied. He that was assaulted was the victim allegedly. The prosecution showed photographic evidence of the intrusion into his property and showed pictures inside the doorway in the doorway to the left of the door to the right of the door. Where to meet it looked like blood spatter or droplets constant flow of droplets 15 cm or so apart. The victim alleges that he went to the front door prior revealing who the person was by sliding the curtain open he was struck and he said he did not see the person. Then he said while he was on the floor grabbed a mop and jabbed the person while another person struck him again from behind now he said he started to crawl away. But yet the blood pattern did not show smudging in the droplets as if he slept through. They showed to me an experience that I am that he was still standing as he was moving through the room. . And something at code that I didn't quite understand it was - . The second witness the second witness was being examined and she mentioned the person who is in the doc and she mentioned that he had been to jail the defence asked the judge to remove the jury as well as the witness and stated that the guilty party had his reputation damaged as I understand it. . The Corrs prejudice or make the jury prejudice tell him that is in the doc
@@AnthsLawSchool ure leading to provocation of some sort Anthony 🤣 Just literally finished exam for Crim law. Until i watched ur video 1hr before the exam, I didn't realise that complicity was not really a legal term 🤦♀️ . Pray for me LOL
I'd say its an criminal offence your summary lectures haven't won an Oscar or noble prize..thanks so much
Laughed so hard at this comment :)
The right offered does not sell: justiceleaks.org/
classic! And so true. Incredibly helpful for a newbie and "second chance mum" like me! Thank you, Agony Anth 🙂
Could you please do one on English criminal law you explain everything so clearly
I’ve listened to the 2-hour Crime, Torts, and Contracts videos a handful of times each. Come exam time I wouldn’t be surprised if your voice pops into my head like a legal Jimminy Cricket. Thanks for making these subjects accessible! YDM
Hey you're very welcome! Hope you smash those exams :)
Thanks for this mate. I listen to these (with my phone in the glovebox - not watching!) in the car and it's hugely useful to brush up on crim. Your work here is highly appreciated.
Great stuff mate. Really glad you have found it helpful :)
The right offered does not sell: justiceleaks.org/
Even after my first semester and now in the second with criminal law 2 , there is no better aid that this piece. Thank You Thank You
My pleasure. Very best of luck with your studies!
Hey Anthony. I just wanted to say thank you for your work on this channel. I watched many of your videos before going to law school in QLD. So far, I've got three 6s and a 7. I'm doing Criminal Law next semester so I'm going to re-watch this video as a primer. Keep up the great work!
Thank you so much as a law student you are incredible and your lectures are incredibly informative ty ty ty love ya guts mate, Tessxx
Always welcome, Tess!
I'm studying to become a software engineer but I'm still interested in understanding the Law. These long videos are absolute gold.
That's awesome. All the best with your studies!
You are a GREAT teacher Doc... thanks so much for all these videos and please keep it up!
Hey thanks so much! You have no idea how much I love knowing that my teaching goes out to African countries, where resources might otherwise be limited. I wish you the very very best!
This is excellent Anthony, I completed Criminal Law 2 years ago, and this is a beaut refresher! Yes please to a new video on Criminal Law Procedures.
Glad to help Greggo! Next one will be negligence though :)
Your presentation of this information is very well done! Appreciate the work
I am just about to start Criminal Law and honestly this is amazing! Thank you!! Also loved the others. Definitely helped me pass my legal institutions course with a Distinction!!!!
A distinction, woohoo! Well done Katie! Good luck with Crim :)
❤Great for refreshing memory - even for lawyers
I love these, please keep them up! Thanks!
I'll do my best!
Thanks Again Anthony! Has been of great assistance in preparing for study!
Great to hear! Good luck with your studies :)
Thank you for being so vibrant with your detailed explanation. These videos are so helpful for online students.
Thanks for such wonderful feedback Jeanette!
This is a really thorough and intellectually stimulating lecture! Thank you so much for your time making this video :)))
You're very welcome!
Hey Dr. M., I enjoyed your content as a first year, and I still do. As an American student competing in the ICC's moot court competition, it's fascinating to see criminal law dissected in different jurisdictions. Keep on it!
Hey thanks so much, and good luck in that moot competition!
In addition to criminal procedure, I'd love to see a talk on sentencing.
@@afdlink what does ‘jurisdiction’ mean, exactly? I looked it up and it says that it means ‘authority’ but people use the word jurisdiction in so many different contexts and it’s a little confusing. Can you pls explain with some examples Google isn’t helping lol
@@cheechee6473 Hey Gellert, (and Prof. M. if you'd like to correct me) by "jurisdiction" I mean where/when/why a court can exercise judicial authority over a situation. Oftentimes, jurisdictions are divided into the subject matter (what kinds of dispute can a court rule on), personality (who can a court's decision bind), and territory (what geographic boundaries limit a court's authority). But to my comment in particular, I mean the difference between United States law (where I'm a student) and Aussie law. Both legal traditions arose from British imperial interpretation of common law, but developed differently in the American jurisdictions, U.S. law applied to U.S. personsin the territory of the U.S. and the Australian ones (likewise, but for the territories and persons of Australia). Hope that helps. Or, if not, Prof. M. can step in and set us straight. Good luck!
I found this video quite late but I must say this video is incredibly helpful, thank you! I have my work experience with a criminal defence firm in 7 days and this video is a godsend.
Thanks Billy! All the best with the work experience!
This is to be filed for next year when I do criminal law. Thanks for these videos. I have watched many numerous times. Ex ADF.
Very glad to help, oh Grey Man. Got your six.
definitely ex ADF with a username like that, grey man ;)
These videos have been a great resource for me in deciding whether or not I would like to study law. I've found the content of these videos to be fascinating, and I will be applying to law schools this year!
That's wonderful! All the best for your studies.
Fantastic content Anthony! I am studying in a non-code state but this was incredibly useful in contextualising the framework of criminal law and in which it all lies..Great Job :)
Thanks very much Daniel! I studied law in a non-code state too (NSW). It's very helpful to understand both sides of the coin.
Thank you so much for all your videos! They help me in law school immensely :)
I'm so glad!
Excellent stuff - a great back up to a late in life Bach I'm doing. Thank you
Great stuff! All the best for your studies :)
The way you teach is just amazing by breaking down the whole section helped me to learn easily and made me more motivated to study Laws of Australia. Thanks it was a great help for me :) .You should make video on Civil Procedure and other laws.
I'm so glad you got something out of this! I will definitely be adding more and more videos over time :)
The right offered does not sell: justiceleaks.org/
Thanks heaps Anthony! I’m doing Criminal law next semester. This video has given me a great introduction.
I hope your studies are still going really well Vivian!
@@AnthsLawSchool Thanks Anthony! At the end of this semester, I have one more year to go. Currently sitting on a High Distinction average and can't believe how quickly it has all gone!
This is super helpful! A 2 hour summary on evidence would be great!!
Noted!
Absolutely eye opening and easy to understand. Thank you
Glad it was helpful!
The right offered does not sell: justiceleaks.org/
Oh wow! Good bite sized info for me an accountant who has no time to study Aus law but has interest in its general topics. Great work!!
Really glad you found it useful!
Legend Anthony! Cannot wait for your further video on criminal procedure! Plz upload 🤭🤭
I will get there eventually, I promise!
this is great!! thank you I have just started Crim this semester. I can't find the procedure video that follows on from this?
Blessings and many thanks from Carolina Trace NC
You are very welcome! :)
U ARE a GODSEND! I heard ur lecture on torts and it actually saved me in my final exams. There was a question I didn’t know was going to come up in the exam. But I was able to “marinac” it! In other words - without ur teaching anthony we’d be scre%#ed!!
Thank u for being an incredible teacher and for being accessible to us around the globe!
You're very welcome Shaz, and thanks so much for your kind words!
Very nice job, hope you keep going!
Thanks very much - and I sure will!
Though I graduated from University of Canberra in 2011,and still residing in the same area, I acknowledged you as an expert Law lecturer though there are few areas of Criminal law, which differs depend on the jurisdiction in Australia. Your videos are really good for revision. I tried to search for ACT&NSW Criminal law experts' videos on TH-cam, but I couldn't find the best as yours.
Hey, thanks so much. You are right, criminal law in the ACT is much closer in format to the Commonwealth Criminal Code, and criminal law in NSW is mostly common law, supplemented by the Crimes Act. This video is mostly focused on Queensland, but the concepts are generally applicable.
Cheers!
@@AnthsLawSchool yes, concepts are one way,and that's why I enjoy your videos.
The right offered does not sell: justiceleaks.org/
YES! YES! YES! Thank you!
No worries! No worries! No worries! :-)
Dr Marinac you are just the Best. Please can you do a video on Family and Property Law? Watching from Cameroon.
your the best thank you for the cases
I don’t even study law and I watch and love your videos 😂😂
Thanks a lot for your vids 🙏🙏
You're very welcome Theadore! Thanks for your support!
This video is really helpful, could you please cdo a video tutorial on criminal law procedure, thanks!
Please do a criminal law procedure video as well! That would be so helpful
It's on the list :)
this video is great, thank you
You're very welcome!
Could you please do one on UK criminal law you explanation is so clear
Hi again Anthony, thanks again for all your great content-really helped me to hit the ground running with studies. I just had a query regarding self defence if you had a moment? Up until 2005, self defence was defined in common Law, and then specified in The Crimes Acts of the Commonwealth, states and territories, including the recent reforms to the Vic Crimes Act. From my understanding the self defence definition in the acts was based on common law-Zecevic particularly. Does this therefore mean, that these past cases( Zecevic, Viro etc) are mentioned only as obiter Dictum during a trial now, and that ultimately any decision has to be taken in line with the Act. Just having some difficulty getting my head around how Common Law and Statute exist in practice simultaneously? Thank-you and totally understand if you don't have the time to answer. Kind regards Jase
Hi Jase,
This is a great question. When a common law principle - in this case self-defence - is codified in a statute, the task of the court changes. Instead of declaring the common law, the task of the court is now to *interpret the statute*. So the starting point is the words of the statute.
However, when interpreting the statute, the court is absolutely allowed to refer to the common law which came before the court, in order to understand the statute. So, if the statute basically just implements the common law without making any conceptual changes, the court will absolutely continue to rely on those earlier cases - but it is relying on those cases in order to assist the court to properly interpret the statute. The cases are no longer the authority - the statute is the authority - but if the statute really just reflects those cases, it would be silly to stop referring to them. After all, case judgments are usually far more detailed and nuanced that statute could ever be, and cases are addressed o an individual incident, while statute must be addressed to the whole population for the whole future.
Does that make sense? The prior cases don't become irrelevant - they become tools for properly understanding and interpreting the statute.
Hope that helps!
Anthony
@@AnthsLawSchool That's fantastic Anthony and really cleared up my understanding of how Common law relates to Statute. Really appreciate you taking the time to discuss this in such understandable detail. Thanks again Kind regards Jase
Thank you
Hi Anthony, thanks so much for your great lectures. As a law student nearing the end of my degree and working in law, it's really helpful to have these refreshers.
My dad is a lecturer and I showed him your videos. He would like to know what software and/or process you use to make these 'law in 2 hours' videos. He think's it great and would love to do something similar with having the text coming up in the background while he speaks to camera. Any chance you could shed some light on the process?
Hi Bec, sorry it has taken me so long to get back to you. I use iMovie to make the videos, and I just use powerpoint to create the graphic screens, then save them as PDFs. My main tips are to invest in a good quality mic, some good lighting (it's cheap on sites like Amazon) and a decent camera. The actual process is not nearly as complicated as one might imagine :)
i am studying law in Zambia 95% of everything you taught is relatable thank you so much
It applies in Ghana as well
😅
Anthony always love your top up cramming videos over exam period. Funny reference to Tones and I, and really glad you took consideration and warning for your viewers at the sexual elements component. Thanks again
Hey thank you so much. Some of that material is pretty tough, but I think it's important for lawyers to know, too.
Cheers
@@AnthsLawSchoolI wrote first comment before exam. Funny enough my crim law exam was on sexual offences. I passed thanks to your top up. On a side note: my copy of 'Learning Law' ironically got stolen last year from my doorstep. lol
very informative and entertaining hope one day to be a defense lawyer. anyway, great lecture.
That's a great ambition Ivan - very best of luck! Keep your eye on the channel, I have a bunch of criminal law and evidence cases coming along which ought to be of interest to you too :)
this is great!
Thanks so much!
I love this!
I'm really glad!
Thanks very much....
No worries, Andrew. Share with your friends!
It would be nice to hear about criminal law at the commonwealth level, and how that works. Including the entering of international treaties etc.
Is it an Australian crime, by treaty, prosected by the commonwealth, to bribe a foreign government official, or say an official of the WTO?
And I notice terrorism wasn't touched on, I believe that part of criminal law at the state and federal levels is very strict (i.e. intending to plan an act of terror- not just planning it- is an offence with big penalties).
And those other strict liability ones, like entering a declared war zone (Syria for example), is just being there a crime?
Great video :)
Hi Dylan, glad you liked the video!
I will eventually do a video on Commonwealth Crimes, but it's down the list a bit. Bribing a foreign official is a Commonwealth crime in the Criminal Code though. There are no criminal offences in Australia which rely entirely on treaty law.
You're right that I didn't touch on terrorism offences, but in reality they are hardly ever charged, and not usually part of the undergraduate curriculum. There's a bunch of other offences that I didn't include either ... or it would have been Criminal Law in Sixteen Hours lol
All the best!
Brilliant mate, you're making law accessible for normal people, and making it interesting as well. You handled sexual offenses elegantly.
Thank you so much - and particularly for the last comment. I put a lot of thought into how to deliver that quite difficult material, so I really value that feedback. Cheers!
Thank you very much
You are very welcome!
@@AnthsLawSchool Thank you, can you please do an equity and trusts law in 10 minutes next?
just to be clear what Criminal code is being sited here? if anyone know can you please answer.
Queensland, Australia 😊
I thought all laws were standardised in 2005 across the states. Heard that on Four Corners a few months ago.
Hi Mike, criminal law is still not standard across the states. Is the Four Corners episode still on iView? I'd be happy to check it out and give you a response.
@@AnthsLawSchool Sorry Tony I think I was thinking of workplace legislation. I'm not sure what episode it was.
Am gonna pass law with your help
Damn right you are. Hook in!
Timestamp 25:08 :) gonna watch later. thank you for the great insights!
My pleasure! I'm glad you are finding my stuff helpful :)
Thanks.
No worries!
I'm having my exam in May.
This would be helpful 🖖🖖
Good luck with your exam!
Thank you. I'm studying English Law. Most of the concept are alike. Thanks for this wonderful lecture.
The right offered does not sell: justiceleaks.org/
Sir , any tip to remember the cases please ?
Absolutely. I remember cases by their facts, based on a sentence beginning "The one where ..."
So, Carlill v Carbolic is "The one where Mrs Carlill used the smoke ball and got sick anyway"
Hadley v Baxendale is "The one where the mill needed a new shaft"
And so on. Those little stories are MUCH easier to remember than the case names.
Hope that helps!
Thank you sir , yes it helped
Awesome job!!
Next time please be careful about your face it’s bit blurry however things heard are crystal clear.
Thank you again
My pleasure! I'm learning all the time about how to make these videos - I know more about law than about technology! Having said that, plenty of people will tell you I look better blurry lol
Hi Anthony can you pl do a Human Rights Law in Australia in 2 hours pretty please
Professor
What is it when someone shorten someone's life span buy satistics deliberately
Hi Sir please can you do a Property Law in 2 hours pleasexx
BOOKMARK
22:28
37:17
with the mental incapacity, probability burden is there a case law?
Everyone is presumed to be sane.... 'even Collingwood supporters', I actually burst out laughing, well played sir, well played
*grins* Bombers forever.
Professor Anthony marinac I took your advice and attended a court for further education interesting interesting indeed. I found that the person that was assaulted lied.
He that was assaulted was the victim allegedly.
The prosecution showed photographic evidence of the intrusion into his property and showed pictures inside the doorway in the doorway to the left of the door to the right of the door.
Where to meet it looked like blood spatter or droplets constant flow of droplets 15 cm or so apart.
The victim alleges that he went to the front door prior revealing who the person was by sliding the curtain open he was struck and he said he did not see the person.
Then he said while he was on the floor grabbed a mop and jabbed the person while another person struck him again from behind now he said he started to crawl away.
But yet the blood pattern did not show smudging in the droplets as if he slept through.
They showed to me an experience that I am that he was still standing as he was moving through the room.
.
And something at code that I didn't quite understand it was -
.
The second witness the second witness was being examined and she mentioned the person who is in the doc and she mentioned that he had been to jail the defence asked the judge to remove the jury as well as the witness and stated that the guilty party had his reputation damaged as I understand it.
.
The Corrs prejudice or make the jury prejudice tell him that is in the doc
Yo
Yo!
Primary code 123 ABC
"EVEN COLLINGWOOD SUPPORTERS"? ... HEEEEEEYYYYYYYYY lol
LOL I didn't realise there would be Collingwood supporters intelligent enough to watch my videos ;-) Go Bombers!
@@AnthsLawSchool ure leading to provocation of some sort Anthony 🤣
Just literally finished exam for Crim law. Until i watched ur video 1hr before the exam, I didn't realise that complicity was not really a legal term 🤦♀️ .
Pray for me LOL
The music is such actrun off, it just grates my nerves.
Hi Kathleen, I was being a bit funny with the music. The title is "Criminal image", hence the choice. Nowadays I use more passive music :)
Thank you