🚨 Supreme Court pulls DANGEROUS stunt

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ธ.ค. 2024
  • Democracy Watch episode 109: Marc Elias discusses the Supreme Court refusing to overturn a dangerous, anti-First Amendment case.
    SIGN UP: www.democracyd...
    Subscribe for more and follow me here:
    TH-cam (español): / @briantylercohenespanol
    Apple Podcasts: apple.co/36UvEHs
    Spotify: open.spotify.c...
    Twitter: / briantylercohen
    Instagram: / briantylercohen
    Facebook: / briantylercohen
    Patreon: / briantylercohen
    Newsletter: www.briantyler...
    TikTok: / briantylercohen
    Suit by JB Clothiers: jbclothiers.co...

ความคิดเห็น •

  • @briantylercohen
    @briantylercohen  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +157

    To follow my coverage of the Trump trial, please subscribe here: th-cam.com/users/briantylercohen

    • @kirkiem23
      @kirkiem23 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Appreciate all your hard work and great coverage! 🙏🏻

    • @BigMamaBlaze
      @BigMamaBlaze 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Already am

    • @boburanus69
      @boburanus69 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      You have the right to protest. But soon as you are responsible for organizing a protest, you become culpable for damages that may result from said organization.

    • @SixteenTonesStudio
      @SixteenTonesStudio 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      how do we preserve our right to peaceably assemble? Well, by peaceably assembling, of course and petition our government for redress of grievances

    • @DennisTheJuniorMenace
      @DennisTheJuniorMenace 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Does this mean that the cops that were hurt or families of the deceased of Jan 6th sue Donald Trump?!

  • @norby9k879
    @norby9k879 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1529

    SCOTUS has become a mockery.

    • @tvdinner325
      @tvdinner325 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

      Biden MUST stack it.

    • @kirkiem23
      @kirkiem23 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Trump stacked so many courts, unfortunately, including the SCOTUS

    • @barbiedahl
      @barbiedahl 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      #JoeBidenWhereAreYou

    • @kirkiem23
      @kirkiem23 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +56

      We need fair and impartial judges, not partisans or part of the Federalist Society.

    • @kirkiem23
      @kirkiem23 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @Ono-Lin_Tam they're not hiding their plans to end our democracy. So many people don't know about it.

  • @PoeticProphetic
    @PoeticProphetic 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +276

    If the organizer of the protest can be sued, then let’s sue the guy who gave a speech promoting his followers to “march to the capitol”

    • @deanosborn3464
      @deanosborn3464 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You forgot the "and peacefully protest" part that's at the end of it

    • @AtomicBuffalo
      @AtomicBuffalo 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What standing will they recognize?

    • @jamarahn4221
      @jamarahn4221 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      The guy who organized it. Yeah!

    • @old_grey_cat
      @old_grey_cat 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      ​​@@deanosborn34646:35 Elias directly addresses that - so even had there not been hours of talk about "stop them" and "fight" and "if Pence doesn't do the right thing..." the injured police could sue had the rally been in 5th Circuit territory.
      P.S. btw, injured police are suing Trump, in a civil action. The DC court of Appeals ruled that he was acting as candidate, not President. The SCOTUS hearing on Presidential immunity might affect the case.

    • @eltorocal
      @eltorocal 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@old_grey_cat He only became a candidate the very second he Peacefully transferred the Presidency to Joe Biden.

  • @GeneTurner-gg4yo
    @GeneTurner-gg4yo 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +94

    This lousy ass supreme court is taking cases it should never be involved with but ignoring cases they should obviously overturn! The injustice and politics is sickening!

    • @MS-ns2pj
      @MS-ns2pj 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The SCOTUS is following the U.S. Constitution. Which cases do you believe they should overturn?

  • @Over.It.999
    @Over.It.999 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    I thought the Supreme Court had actually made a ruling. I'm glad to hear this case can be appealed again. And while that's happening, may we vote in a blue wave this fall to bring on Supreme Court reforms!🌊🌊🌊

  • @JosephWasielewski-du1mj
    @JosephWasielewski-du1mj 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +75

    They lied to get in ..and now its gone to hell in a handbag!!

    • @lovetafrank7852
      @lovetafrank7852 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Yah the 70000 dollar handbags they walk around at mara lardo with.

  • @CharlieFreeman-xw6fl
    @CharlieFreeman-xw6fl 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +280

    I hope this backfires on SCOTUS!!

    • @bustercrimes5434
      @bustercrimes5434 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      how they are above the law

    • @Lumi_Lumi13
      @Lumi_Lumi13 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@bustercrimes5434 Direct action.

    • @savlosavage
      @savlosavage 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They aren't they just dont say it ​@bustercrimes5434

    • @barbiedahl
      @barbiedahl 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No more honor System. Term limits. Mandatory retirement age. Emeritus status. Ethical standards. Financial disclosure. Rotation of Justices. Inspector General of the Supreme Court. 13 justices to oversee 13 Circuit Courts. (Actually, with population growth and demographic changes we now need 15 circuits with 15 justices to oversee them.) AND remove the five perjurers. Reform the Supreme Court now!
      #JoeBidenWhereAreYou

    • @anonymoose116
      @anonymoose116 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The best way is to vote in as many democrats as possible, and pressure to impeach SCOTUS justices.

  • @thatswhatshesaid1812
    @thatswhatshesaid1812 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +865

    So they uphold this, but victims of gun violence can't sue the gun manufacturers....

    • @barbiedahl
      @barbiedahl 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

      Their owner/donors, I mean their "friends," won't allow it.
      #JoeBidenWhereAreYou

    • @kevind4850
      @kevind4850 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      Exactly!!

    • @lorenzamccoy7512
      @lorenzamccoy7512 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Can't make money with freedom

    • @MeepChangeling
      @MeepChangeling 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Its not a toolmaker's fault if people use their tools to do bad things. There are ligitmant and peaceful uses for firearms. They are tools like any other. That IS different from this... but this is still a crock of shit.

    • @elviscreese8936
      @elviscreese8936 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Smh

  • @gagaplex
    @gagaplex 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    Well, presumably, if the organizer is black, they can be held liable. If not, then not. Makes perfect sense in light of this SCOTUS.

  • @LasVegas68
    @LasVegas68 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +205

    Trump, January 6th
    "You have to go down to the Capitol and FIGHT LIKE HELL!"
    Lock Trump up and everyone else who was involved. Period!

    • @chrislacivita6478
      @chrislacivita6478 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      And peacefully protest

    • @cmgweb6951
      @cmgweb6951 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      It would be nice if those were the actual sequence of the use of those words, but it wasn't. He didn't put it that directly. For the two knuckle heads (besides me! HA) that replied, he said "peace and/or peacefully" TWICE. Early in the speech. He said FIGHT, 27 times. We know what he wanted. He got half of it, but they couldn't "do the job" he really wanted.

    • @susansantapola
      @susansantapola 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes and Trump knew full well what his insane cult followers would do .

    • @ianmuir3640
      @ianmuir3640 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And I’ll come with you lol nobody seen him

    • @crrhoades4
      @crrhoades4 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@cmgweb6951 Precisely! He uttered the "peacefully protest" early in his speech when he was just starting up, setting the stage so to speak... thanking coconspirators and the crowd... then followed 45 mins of grievance after grievance, manufacturing heightened outrage until he culminated with the call to "fight like hell to save your country otherwise we'll lose our country." To claim thst speech was a call to peacefully protest is a cynical lie.

  • @aliceanneacts6164
    @aliceanneacts6164 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

    So can someone sue Ginni Thomas for January 6???????!

  • @Musix4me-Clarinet
    @Musix4me-Clarinet 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

    I agree with @MrBENTON78. If the SCOTUS agrees, then *the officers injured in the Jan. 6th rally should be able to sue Trump. The congress should be able to sue Trump for the Jan. 6th rally damages to their offices and property.*

    • @sogorman58
      @sogorman58 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Congress might be able to sue for PTSD for Jan. 6.

    • @roncatdog
      @roncatdog 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@sogorman58 Can I sue the government for the case of PTSD I acquired while serving my country?

  • @Gizmodo-4920
    @Gizmodo-4920 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    TY both for keeping us up-to-date on these types of rulings. Even though it is galling to listen at times, we must keep up with the courts & their sometimes crazy rulings!! And keep working towards meaningful change!! 💙

  • @thesoapfairy638
    @thesoapfairy638 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +205

    So that means trump can be sued for Jan 6 no problems

  • @mlsmith
    @mlsmith 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    doesn't this ruling allow the capitol police injured on Jan 6th to sue Donald Trump since it all began as a Trump Rally?

    • @TheisKrarupHansen
      @TheisKrarupHansen 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Yup

    • @alexandradaniele
      @alexandradaniele 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Capitol Police officers injured on Jan 6th are suing him.

  • @Nosugarcoatingme
    @Nosugarcoatingme 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1036

    The Supreme Court is totally overlooking the fact which separates Jan.6 insurrectionists from normal protest. INTENT!

    • @barbiedahl
      @barbiedahl 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      #JoeBidenWhereAreYou

    • @dewardroy6531
      @dewardroy6531 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

      Specifically, intent to do harm.

    • @IcerinAlaska49
      @IcerinAlaska49 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They didn't overlook anything. Trump appointed republicans to the court, so its now 6 republicans to two dems. Of course they will usually side with him. I don't agree with any court being 'appointed'. They should be voted in just like the rest of the govt.

    • @jenniferpulskamp5592
      @jenniferpulskamp5592 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Good point

    • @socksrocksdocks
      @socksrocksdocks 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@dewardroy6531 yeah because so many people died that day so much intent and harm......not disrupting an event or proceeding is not insurrection

  • @Hadley_T
    @Hadley_T 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    This immediately reminded me
    of some famous quotes:
    "Big protest in D.C. on January 6th.”
    "Be there, will be wild!"

  • @Puzekat2
    @Puzekat2 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +149

    If the Supreme Court allows this case, then we can do the same case against Trump for organizing the protest, and everyone who was hurt that day, including the property that was damaged, should be able to be charged to him.

    • @SC-dm1ct
      @SC-dm1ct 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Is DC in the 5th circuit?

    • @MaryBravado-wy8iq
      @MaryBravado-wy8iq 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Absolutely! NO SCOTUS'S ARE ABOVE THE U.S. CITIZENS LAWS! AKA THE U.S. CONSTITUTION! WHICH THEY'VE FAILED UPON WITH REMOVING TRUMP FROM STATE BALLOTS!!!!!
      TERM LIMITS "DEMANDED" !!!!!
      RepubliCONS WAKE UP! YOU ARE FAILURES!
      VOTE BLUE! 💯💙✌️💙👌💙👋💙

    • @Jimmy_Mac767
      @Jimmy_Mac767 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      When did this happen?

  • @TheCasualRealtor
    @TheCasualRealtor 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

    SCOTUS IS BOUGHT AND PAID FOR!! I wonder how much they were bought for?

    • @rwh1818
      @rwh1818 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Ask tbe Federalist Society (the group responsible for the recent "placements").

    • @channarosenblatt8197
      @channarosenblatt8197 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      A lifetime of massive support, and status in the world of the mega-rich and MAGA rich.

  • @missred586799
    @missred586799 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +219

    There goes our rights! And this is just the beginning.

    • @janiecovey9009
      @janiecovey9009 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      Think Roe versus Wade was the beginning

    • @merannicuill6435
      @merannicuill6435 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      Oh, that has already begun. Remember the women and babies who are now dying because women don't deserve help with child bearing??

    • @lindarockafellow5058
      @lindarockafellow5058 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      And voting rights!

    • @nataliehatcher4343
      @nataliehatcher4343 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      DON'T GIVE UP, GET BUSY!!!

    • @Lumi_Lumi13
      @Lumi_Lumi13 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@janiecovey9009 Citizen's United was, imo. It took power from the people & gave it to corporations by making $$$ "speech".

  • @Bigsteve0091
    @Bigsteve0091 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    So anyone can show up to a protest pretending to be a supporter and commit a violent act against a lawman and the organizer can be sued. Great law making in the South as usual.

    • @iancameron8391
      @iancameron8391 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What do you expect from the bible belt

  • @wxmyjnsn
    @wxmyjnsn 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

    SO someone needs to point out to the courts that this will leave DT liable for Jan 6th!

    • @dabullzfan25
      @dabullzfan25 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He didn't organise and wasn't part of a Black Lives Matter protest. Laws aren't equally applied to him; why would they start now? All of his on-going cases, he will walk, skate, glide from consequences. People with legit grievances will have the courts do an end-run around their First Amendment rights with these lawsuits. But people who are in power but love playing victim, they won't see accountability behind these type suits.

  • @MoeMoe0079
    @MoeMoe0079 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +888

    SCOTUS needs to be ran out.

    • @iangator
      @iangator 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Had a funny joke all lined up about the supreme court being run over as opposed to being ran out, but not gonna post it because... idk just doesn't feel like the right time and place.
      Seriously though, FUCK THE SUPREME COURT. 3/9s of them should be impeached for lying during their confirmation hearings

    • @bobbart4198
      @bobbart4198 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ... SCOTUS needs Term Limits ... Life-time Appointments have NO place in a functioning Democracy ! ...

    • @barbiedahl
      @barbiedahl 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      #JoeBidenWhereAreYou

    • @IcerinAlaska49
      @IcerinAlaska49 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

      I don't approve of any court that is 'appointed'. They should have to be voted in just like the rest of govt officials

    • @psyborg4706
      @psyborg4706 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      That would be the nice thing to do.

  • @coreychandler2016
    @coreychandler2016 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +53

    Given this ruling, Trump is responsible for all January 6th damages. Or am I missing something?

  • @vincentfalvey2181
    @vincentfalvey2181 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Time for people in Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas to sue Donald J Trump for the January 6th protest.

  • @tomhorsley6566
    @tomhorsley6566 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2899

    OK then, the injured police officers in D.C. should sue Donald Trump for organizing Jan. 6th.

    • @susanzemke6569
      @susanzemke6569 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +141

      I think some are.

    • @richietattersall2122
      @richietattersall2122 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +61

      They have that right care of the current US Supreme Court.

    • @lowwatthalo1654
      @lowwatthalo1654 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +63

      buT thAt's difFerEnt....

    • @Paul-wi1qm
      @Paul-wi1qm 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bad news for Orange turd

    • @Yourdeadmeat69
      @Yourdeadmeat69 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

      Nailed it.

  • @JosephWasielewski-du1mj
    @JosephWasielewski-du1mj 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +58

    SCOTUS IS A NIGHTMARE LATELY..NEVER FELT SO UNSAFE IN AMERICA..NEVER!! CAN NOT EVEN TRUST OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM...THINGS ARE GETTING BAD!!!

    • @charlesasmith7836
      @charlesasmith7836 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Agree don't trust SCOTUS one bit I have lost all faith and confidence in them because they are trump judges 🎉

  • @vickyhanson7307
    @vickyhanson7307 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +148

    Wouldn't that make tRump also liable for January 6th?

    • @elaineburnett5230
      @elaineburnett5230 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Yes

    • @4saken404
      @4saken404 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Only if the law were applied equally. But apparently the fact that you can't have it both ways means nothing to conservatives.

  • @sharronmiller451
    @sharronmiller451 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +63

    The Supreme Court is such an embarrassment! Follow the law or resign from the court.

    • @MS-ns2pj
      @MS-ns2pj 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They are following the U.S. Constitution.

    • @HalfCrazy520
      @HalfCrazy520 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@MS-ns2pj No, they are not.

  • @marioavila1235
    @marioavila1235 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +78

    Start a petition nationwide
    Disband the Supreme Court ….
    If they’re not going to conduct themselves without political bias…..
    Stretch of their power

    • @TerryFlynn-sd1ho
      @TerryFlynn-sd1ho 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Trump Puppets have brought the Supreme Court to a New low!!

  • @rkaybutler1018
    @rkaybutler1018 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +68

    Why can't we now sue the organizers of Jan 6?

  • @stormshadax
    @stormshadax 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +118

    They're doing something similar in Georgia as well, for any organizer of any event. Our right to protest and assemble peacefully is being attacked.

    • @bulkvanderhuge9006
      @bulkvanderhuge9006 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yep, this corrupt SCROTUS slowly removing our 1st amendment rights.

    • @barbiedahl
      @barbiedahl 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      They only revere the 2nd Amendment, not the 1st.

  • @CindymeCindy
    @CindymeCindy 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

    It’s frightening to see our Supreme Court is as dirty as it is.

    • @brentduanefoster
      @brentduanefoster 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That and the fact that it didn't have to happen.

    • @dc4457
      @dc4457 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Presidents have been packing the Supreme Court ever since Roosevelt.

  • @andramackeywhyte8155
    @andramackeywhyte8155 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +581

    I'm so sick of everything that's happening. What do they have on these people for them to be betraying our country like this🙄

    • @omenpyro458
      @omenpyro458 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

      money

    • @bulkvanderhuge9006
      @bulkvanderhuge9006 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because they're being paid by the Federalist Society and the Heritage Foundation to make America what those two organizations want America to be.

    • @rockybalboa4593
      @rockybalboa4593 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +68

      This never would have happened if people weren’t lazy and had come out in 2016. Trump never should have ever been elected in the first place. Too many people were lazy and stayed home. Elections have consequences.

    • @JN24185
      @JN24185 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

      Supreme Court Justices for Gods sake. It’s truly unbelievable.

    • @shelleyabbate9824
      @shelleyabbate9824 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​​​@@rockybalboa4593He should have been disqualified as soon as he said Mexicans are rapists & drug dealers. This is what happens when the federal & state govts allow racists bigots corrupt lying traitors to run for office. If a person can't get to the polls, there's mail & drop boxes to go to. Or give the envelope to their mail carrier. It's already stamped & addressed to the courthouse. No excuses for not voting.

  • @sheenestevez6710
    @sheenestevez6710 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +87

    This should pave the way for the Capitol Police and staff who were injured to civilly sue the orange person for what happened and for their injuries.

  • @KLH916
    @KLH916 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +254

    So a cop can sue me but I, a citizen cannot sue a PUBLIC SERVANT? Make it make sense..

    • @DannyMancheno
      @DannyMancheno 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      You are not the ruling class.

    • @tanyasteers4802
      @tanyasteers4802 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      Best thing my state did is end qualified immunity

    • @donnacosey
      @donnacosey 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I believe you can because the all are supposed to have bonds that officers hold that protect city from liability. But not sure if it’s different from state to state

    • @richietattersall2122
      @richietattersall2122 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@tanyasteers4802
      "Qualified immunity" is a total violation of "Equal Protection Under the Laws" in Section 1 of the 14th Amendment, it SPECIFICALLY applies to States.

    • @lorenzamccoy7512
      @lorenzamccoy7512 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      It depends on how many billionaires you have in your pocket

  • @Jamescityboygardening
    @Jamescityboygardening 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    So we should be able to Sue Gimni Thomas for her incitement, we have her on Text.

  • @aviacopeland1075
    @aviacopeland1075 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

    The position of Scotus should have term limits. They can't make decisions for everybody if they're corrupt and can't be trusted!!

    • @rockothepig
      @rockothepig 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Every position in the govt needs term limits… pretty obvious

    • @aviacopeland1075
      @aviacopeland1075 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rockothepig it is obvious but that's not how it is!

  • @gilbertsandoval6463
    @gilbertsandoval6463 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    Money can't buy love, but it sure can buy the Supreme Court!

  • @davidwilken3584
    @davidwilken3584 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

    If the Supreme Court continues on this path of restricting our rights, there soon will be no reason to follow this court and we will have to change it out. Either the easy way or the hard way.

  • @charlesvanderhoog7056
    @charlesvanderhoog7056 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Has the American Supreme Court any authority left? America's authority in the world as freedom and democracy proponent has almost vanished. Did you know that today American tourists are laughed (scoffed) at in Europe for their stupid, debilitated, atavistic utterances when engaged in conversations?

  • @LazloJ1
    @LazloJ1 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +414

    Pretty simple solution here: One of the officers injured on Jan. 6th needs to sue Trump for organizing that protest.

    • @brutusinthesin5883
      @brutusinthesin5883 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

      Sue Clarence Thomas' wife. 😅

    • @laurensohaney4216
      @laurensohaney4216 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      The surviving families of the officers who died should sue him and Ghouliani.

    • @bonniebreckenridge5236
      @bonniebreckenridge5236 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      They are.

    • @BarbaraFlowers-wq1ru
      @BarbaraFlowers-wq1ru 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Capitol Police are suing Donald Trump because of the attack on the capitol j6

    • @garybremer2467
      @garybremer2467 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You are ignorant. Open your eyes

  • @allisonmarlow184
    @allisonmarlow184 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

    This is horrible. We're going back in time and losing established rights.

    • @robinsmith8846
      @robinsmith8846 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Right. And since Trump won a potus term it has escalated. We had Mitch not let Obama fill a seat, then rushed to full RBG seat. Cheats. We need to flip that court blue. We need to make Puerto Rico and DC states. We need to stop the GOP gerrymandering and making voting harder. We need to check all these attacks on democracy. Enough. We need Biden now, and a new Obama after him.

  • @michelinecyr.rainville7630
    @michelinecyr.rainville7630 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +661

    This U.S. Supreme Court is just an absolute mockery.

    • @barbiedahl
      @barbiedahl 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No more honor System. Term limits. Mandatory retirement age. Emeritus status. Ethical standards. Financial disclosure. Rotation of Justices. Inspector General of the Supreme Court. 13 justices to oversee 13 Circuit Courts. (Actually, with population growth and demographic changes we now need 15 circuits with 15 justices to oversee them.) AND remove the five perjurers. Reform the Supreme Court now!
      #JoeBidenWhereAreYou

    • @socksrocksdocks
      @socksrocksdocks 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      lets be honest no they are not you are just mad because you don't agree because your rationality is gone

    • @pifflepockle
      @pifflepockle 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@socksrocksdocksTit

    • @gothicavictoria1341
      @gothicavictoria1341 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@socksrocksdocks Let's be honest, yes, they are. This isn't about not agreeing with the politics of the Supreme Court, it's about the current Supreme Court is trying to make it illegal to protest against the institutionalized racism in the police force, justice system, and the government. If this decision goes through, right-wing conservatives will be able to imprison any and all Black Lives Matter protestors or anyone using their first amendment that goes against them. Rational people are angry because what these corrupt judges are doing should be illegal and they should all be removed from their positions because aside from taking bribes and not disclosing all the "gifts" they received from wealthy patrons (looking at you Judge Thomas Clarence), they are trying to make it harder to protest. I have a question for you, how does that boot taste?

    • @hypervigilance1465
      @hypervigilance1465 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      corrupt as hell .

  • @cybergothstudios94
    @cybergothstudios94 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I so love how regularly rights are being stripped from us.

  • @gailsgig
    @gailsgig 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +70

    THIS COURT MUST BE STOPPED!

    • @maplebones
      @maplebones 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Tar and feathers ?

  • @wxmyjnsn
    @wxmyjnsn 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    So its up to us Jurors to stop this madness!

  • @EricHamm
    @EricHamm 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    TX is fucking up so much, I need to leave ASAP. Fuck this draconian nightmare being forced on Texans.

    • @pjesf
      @pjesf 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      As are AZ, NV, LA…

    • @cdmit27
      @cdmit27 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Texas was MAGA 20 years before MAGA was a thing. I hate living in this SHITHOLE!

  • @sladelefty
    @sladelefty 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

    A country is lost when its courts become corrupt.

  • @Madison7807
    @Madison7807 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

    Those who organized the Jan 6 "protest" should be worried!

  • @gerrypitts3673
    @gerrypitts3673 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

    Term limits on supreme court justices this is ridiculous 😮😮😮

    • @roncatdog
      @roncatdog 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      IT IS TIME!

    • @brotherblite2661
      @brotherblite2661 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well past time..!!!

  • @SmilingIbis
    @SmilingIbis 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

    This court is pure trash.

  • @hazepennington9303
    @hazepennington9303 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +51

    This is another reason why we should have term limits for all Judges 🇺🇸💯

    • @karensagal8230
      @karensagal8230 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      There should be NO Lifetime Appointments for anything!!!

  • @marybelliotti894
    @marybelliotti894 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    Time to sue Ginnie and her hubby, Judge Clarence Thomas!

  • @i.h.1446
    @i.h.1446 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    Great... law enforcement gets "qualified immunity" AND gets to sue public over anything.
    Autocracy is here.

  • @teresajannuzzio2408
    @teresajannuzzio2408 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +515

    TIME TO GO AFTER THE SUPREME COURT!!!!

    • @tracychapman1461
      @tracychapman1461 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      Yeeeeessssssss

    • @barbiedahl
      @barbiedahl 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      #JoeBidenWhereAreYou

    • @socksrocksdocks
      @socksrocksdocks 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      yal are so delusional lol

    • @likenootherX1
      @likenootherX1 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      ​@socksrocksdocks naw we need look they have been only been kid one sided these days and they suppose to be the high court

    • @elviscreese8936
      @elviscreese8936 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      It’s time for Democrats to stock that court

  • @lzrd8460
    @lzrd8460 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    WTH is going on with the SC? And WHY are they protecting that orange mango? Shameful to say the least.

    • @brentduanefoster
      @brentduanefoster 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because one-third of the court are his appointees. We were warned about this, but too many people didn't want to listen.

  • @a24396
    @a24396 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Meanwhile, SCOTUS has decided that obstructing an official proceeding is fine if the obstruction didn't literally cause destruction of the documents required in the proceeding.... Despite the law not requiring that...

  • @kevinkeith4578
    @kevinkeith4578 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +109

    Katie Porter for supreme court. We needed to protest all recent decisions that changed laws in favor of Trump.

    • @richardcalderwood9250
      @richardcalderwood9250 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Trump appointees to the Supreme Court should be dismissed 9:49

    • @WJV9
      @WJV9 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      She is of more value in House or Senate.

    • @VickieHughesChupp
      @VickieHughesChupp 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If not she should be in the cabinet in some capacity. She is brilliant.

    • @pamelaweber1286
      @pamelaweber1286 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I totally agree Katie Porter Supreme Court ❤❤❤❤❤

    • @deanosborn3464
      @deanosborn3464 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Which laws specifically favor Trump? I'll be waiting

  • @MrBENTON78
    @MrBENTON78 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1675

    The the US should be able to sue Trump and his organizers for Jan. 6th.

    • @LuvPureCom
      @LuvPureCom 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +121

      My thoughts exactly! Along with the likes of John Eastman, and Ginny Thomas, and Rudy, and ...

    • @darrellknott1110
      @darrellknott1110 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +156

      So all police officers injured on Jan 06 2021 could sue Ginni Thomas ( she organized the buses ) Stone, Flynn, trump et al.

    • @donnavorce8856
      @donnavorce8856 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +68

      My exact thought and it was immediate.

    • @chatnboy
      @chatnboy 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      EXACTLY…use this ruling against them!!!They take the cases that tilt the scales to the crazy triggered maga republicant party 🤡’S!!!#STACKTHESUPREMECOURT

    • @artvanderlay6974
      @artvanderlay6974 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh, they'll find a loophole to prevent that. These corrupt liars have no ethics, morals or decency.

  • @justicekharma7938
    @justicekharma7938 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Sen. Whitehouse: Justice Thomas has ‘direct conflict of interest’ in T ...
    TH-cam MSNBC

  • @justaghoulintheworld
    @justaghoulintheworld 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    So a mass protest is illegal, but an individual wandering into a protest with an assault rifle with intent, well that's just open carry and ultimately self defense?

    • @charlesvorones3612
      @charlesvorones3612 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Supreme Court: Mass protests are illegal, if they promote civil rights... but they ARE legal if they are right-wing activities, such as interfering with certified fair elections that have gone through all court inquires and multiple recounts

    • @inaboyle1061
      @inaboyle1061 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      KYLE RITTENHOUSE, comes to mind.

    • @dielaughing73
      @dielaughing73 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@inaboyle1061sorry, did someone say "Shittenhouse"?

  • @janiecovey9009
    @janiecovey9009 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +370

    So sick of this SCOTUS .

    • @barbiedahl
      @barbiedahl 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      #JoeBidenWhereAreYou

    • @rogersprague563
      @rogersprague563 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      That's why I call it SCROTOM

    • @pjesf
      @pjesf 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@rogersprague563👍🏻👍🏻😂

    • @roncatdog
      @roncatdog 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@rogersprague563 "SCROTUS." 😉

    • @janiecovey9009
      @janiecovey9009 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      LOL

  • @anncata7368
    @anncata7368 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +74

    It’s time for Biden to open more seats on the Supreme Court. Those conservative justices need to be held accountable for the HAVOC they are doing to the people in America.

    • @marcberman6920
      @marcberman6920 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      We're going to need 60 votes in the Senate first

    • @robinantonio8870
      @robinantonio8870 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Change the law. No lifetime appointments. And someone they are accountable to. The public should elect them

    • @hook-x6f
      @hook-x6f 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Really I agree but the 6 to 3 split is really good for democrats. These prick justices are going to watch the GOP lose and lose and lose. Just watch. If there is enough resolve the GOP will have a really hard time winning until the court changes.

    • @michaeldpa1333
      @michaeldpa1333 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Amen! Time to expand SCOTUS +3 Biden picks and Term Limitations.

    • @BlueSkys6799
      @BlueSkys6799 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I agree. The face of this SCOTUS needs to be changed.

  • @illawarriorhill70
    @illawarriorhill70 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    By that logic, if someone shoots up a shopping mall, it is the mall's fault for organizing the shops to be there? Or a concert event etc?

  • @dingdiddledoo
    @dingdiddledoo 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    They claim that January 6 was a protest. How about we go after the organizer for damages?

  • @4brigger
    @4brigger 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +132

    if the officer can sue in the capacity of his office, qualified immunity shouldn't exist, you can't have it both ways

    • @pecny
      @pecny 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ON MFing TARGET

    • @jvcyt298
      @jvcyt298 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I suspect that is exactly what they want.

    • @lisafink98
      @lisafink98 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Qualified immunity is limited, there are exceptions. If they didn’t have some immunity we’d have no police force, every municipality would be bankrupt and our court system would collapse.

    • @fairyprincess911
      @fairyprincess911 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lisafink98Maybe that would be a start

    • @ciresound
      @ciresound 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@lisafink98 No they wouldn't. it would fall on the individual and there finances . Not on the police department or tax payers

  • @DudeStone
    @DudeStone 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    Down with the crazy political judges!!!!

  • @mikekelly5869
    @mikekelly5869 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Dangerous times.

  • @HoneyBadger80886
    @HoneyBadger80886 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    #BLM ...I was at a few. And I witnessed undercover cops agitating. Witnessed.

  • @dougcarmichael8782
    @dougcarmichael8782 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    If we follow this ruling? Can Jenny Thomas (Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas wife) be held liable for her helping organize Jan. 6th coup attempt?

  • @Ianmundo
    @Ianmundo 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +108

    So much for “Land of the Free”, the right to protest is vital for democracy. These same judges will argue that Trump is not liable for inciting January 6th

    • @annefitz7346
      @annefitz7346 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Guess that’s what they’re doing to protect drump. Starting to really hate & distrust scotus

    • @dielaughing73
      @dielaughing73 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Taking away freedoms is the point..

  • @imtru2me
    @imtru2me 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    We need to even out the supreme court before they take all of our civil liberties away

  • @michaelsherck5099
    @michaelsherck5099 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +387

    We need to vote for an overwhelming Democratic Senate majority and impeach the political thugs on the Supreme Court.

    • @deanosborn3464
      @deanosborn3464 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      For what? Just because you don't like their rulings. Give me a break.

    • @lauren_faulkner
      @lauren_faulkner 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

      @@deanosborn3464do you or do you not understand the constitution

    • @deanosborn3464
      @deanosborn3464 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@lauren_faulkner Do you? It sure sounds like you dont

    • @knowbody5292
      @knowbody5292 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Damn ✅️

    • @mattleathen445
      @mattleathen445 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@deanosborn3464impeachment is a the Constitutional response to this insane “Supreme” Court. Did you even watch this video on to why this non-decision is absurd? It’s not that we don’t like their decision, it’s that their decisions are advancing fascism and are inconsistent with their own decision less than 2 years ago.

  • @janistotham-davies4300
    @janistotham-davies4300 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    Isn’t it time that the Supreme Court was held accountable for undoing precedents and for not upholding precedents that are in place. The US courts especially the Supreme Court need investigating and Judges removed for not doing their jobs and being partisan, which they have by law not allowed to be?

    • @robinantonio8870
      @robinantonio8870 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Precedents aren't always fair or just either.

  • @russianbluecat6865
    @russianbluecat6865 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

    I'm so disgusted with the courts!

  • @elsabeleroux7896
    @elsabeleroux7896 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    Good Lord, what a TOTAL DISASTER America has become.

  • @BlackstoneMalone
    @BlackstoneMalone 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    Only a criminal would be so focused on packing a court with judges he might one day need!

    • @Dragonfly657
      @Dragonfly657 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Smart 😊

  • @gloriamcculley374
    @gloriamcculley374 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +115

    When will IRS open a case against Clarence Thomas for tax fraud? If he did not report the extravagant gifts to the Government Ethics, it is highly likely he did not report them on his tax returns for years. He must be audited; he needs to be held accountable as well!

    • @coolguy1127
      @coolguy1127 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Ohtani’s bookie was investigated almost instantaneously but Clarence Thomas just keeps skating on through.

    • @maplebones
      @maplebones 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The case will end up at the SCOTUS where they will rule they have immunity. Checkmate.

  • @terigrand6517
    @terigrand6517 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +168

    Im over this Supreme court

    • @barbiedahl
      @barbiedahl 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No more honor System. Term limits. Mandatory retirement age. Emeritus status. Ethical standards. Financial disclosure. Rotation of Justices. Inspector General of the Supreme Court. 13 justices to oversee 13 Circuit Courts. (Actually, with population growth and demographic changes we now need 15 circuits with 15 justices to oversee them.) AND remove the five perjurers. Reform the Supreme Court now!
      #JoeBidenWhereAreYou

    • @socksrocksdocks
      @socksrocksdocks 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      that means they are doing something right i cant wait to see this channel mald after they acquit trump from the non insurrection of January 6th

  • @mindyrosin
    @mindyrosin 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Unless the protest organizer tells the participants something like... Fight like hell. And then someone throws bricks. Yeah, bigly difference. 🙄

  • @cyberneticqualanaut7207
    @cyberneticqualanaut7207 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +48

    I wonder if Trump could be sued for January 6th?

  • @Harlin67
    @Harlin67 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +81

    Its all good, class action suit on behalf of 180 million Americans against MTG, Gaetz, Trump and Giuliani.

    • @dielaughing73
      @dielaughing73 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Problem is, these goons would just overturn it on appeal

    • @charlesasmith7836
      @charlesasmith7836 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I agree America 🇺🇸 should sue all of them including trump 🎉

  • @sunshinelizard1
    @sunshinelizard1 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +95

    What can we do when SCOTUS is corrupt? We are lost.

    • @debrajames3869
      @debrajames3869 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      Vote blue so that we have a democratic house, senate and President and then expand the Supreme Court. We do have power if everyone votes!

    • @CraftyGrandmaDem
      @CraftyGrandmaDem 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We need to vote Blue all the way down the ballot. Once Biden wins, the democrats can do something that's called Political Theatre. It's suppose to be easier then impeaching them. Democrats launch a formal investigation into Clarence Thomas. We have a lot of dirt on him already. We pressure him until he retires or resigns. I heard they did this for several justices that were a thorn in Nixon's side. Once we get Thomas out we can start on another one. We know they are corrupt/lied to get their jobs, took bribes. Several of them were rushed into office (with rape accusations or after voting had already started, etc).
      VOTE BLUE then maybe we can clean up the courts.

    • @damienthorne861
      @damienthorne861 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Yes! What the F**k !!

    • @laura_v191
      @laura_v191 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@debrajames3869Joe Biden didn't want to expand the court because than every next president would expand it further and further. I guess Congress would first need to impeach the corrupt and biased judges and second reform the Supreme Court. This lifetime BS is so antiquated. Make the people vote for the judges.

  • @brucestarrenburg4393
    @brucestarrenburg4393 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love hearing from you, Glenn Kirshner, Tim Miller, Mark Elias. All truly fact based. Sure we are biased, but for me in the end… No Scrubbing Necessary! Keep doing what you do!

  • @h.a.s.7612
    @h.a.s.7612 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +85

    SCOTUS: Taking rights away one step at a time.

    • @sylviewalker7560
      @sylviewalker7560 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      U s su preme court of Blackmailed Just us's

  • @rsanders1569
    @rsanders1569 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    The question I have is, how do we hold Judges, Local, State, Federal, Appeals. whatever. Responsible for their corruption? Why does the Supreme Court not be required to speak before the whole American People and provide their reasoning literally on everything they do?

    • @harvey3rdman464
      @harvey3rdman464 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They do. "Opinions are posted on the website upon release in slip opinion format. Slip opinions remain posted until replaced with opinions edited to reflect the usual publication style of the United States Reports. Updated PDF versions of the opinions are posted on this website as the publication process proceeds, including preliminary prints and bound volumes of the United States Reports." [www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/opinions.aspx]

    • @51whisper
      @51whisper 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      because then it would become a real democracy, and they don't want that.

  • @jeffereyroderick7006
    @jeffereyroderick7006 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +216

    So everyone can sue Trump for Jan 6. Right.

    • @gerrypitts3673
      @gerrypitts3673 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      Class action ASAP

    • @roncatdog
      @roncatdog 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@gerrypitts3673 Actually, a class action suit might work! Trying to sue him individually does not work.

    • @andmos1001
      @andmos1001 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Looks like it

    • @ricardojusino7449
      @ricardojusino7449 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      LETS DO THIS!

  • @steven.h0629
    @steven.h0629 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hang in there Marc! this season is going to be challenging 👍😎✊

  • @user-mi3pv7ql4g
    @user-mi3pv7ql4g 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    This happened with union picketing YEARS ago. Can police chiefs be help responsible now? Can a CEO be held accountable if an employee is breaking laws?

  • @soniagayle6015
    @soniagayle6015 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Wouldn't the Supreme Court be disavowing the LAWS of the land?
    Thought the Court should ruled under the Laws and the Constitution, AND NOT POLITICALLY.

  • @donnavorce8856
    @donnavorce8856 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    It's so weird watching our country come unglued, unhinged, unbridled.
    And as for the court - not much can be done.
    Life appointments and no accountability need to be changed to stop this nonsense. Wonder if the executive can sign an emergency bill into law?

    • @billmccullough777
      @billmccullough777 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      When they grant Trump's immunity plea, the sitting President can restructure the USSC. No problem.

  • @TheAmos1
    @TheAmos1 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    🤔 this is very concerning because no actual harm was inflicted in the 5th circuit jurisdiction. and threats to do harm in Colorado... all of it to eventually quash addressing grievances with the government ... these rulings are unconstitutional

  • @NicolaMcElwee
    @NicolaMcElwee 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +328

    So everyone hurt on jan 6th can sue Trump.

    • @sparx6354
      @sparx6354 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      He doesn't have any more money.....

    • @adria89
      @adria89 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      ​@@sparx6354 but he owns items that could be converted into money 💰 fire sale at Mar a Lago 😂

    • @evelynloving6948
      @evelynloving6948 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Why not, Trump sues anybody and everybody he can, win or lose....Truth !!!!!

    • @bonniebreckenridge5236
      @bonniebreckenridge5236 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      They are suing.

    • @ronaldcross6082
      @ronaldcross6082 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @MartaWomack
    @MartaWomack 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    The Supremes have gone off the rails. Term limits for them should be on the next ballot.

  • @paulaalderman9332
    @paulaalderman9332 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +131

    Clarence 's wife should be sued for the lies and support of Jan 6 assault

    • @breakmylegs7294
      @breakmylegs7294 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It, being Ginny Thomas, looks just like Donald Trump,but with a fat smelly V instead of a fat smelly P

    • @tinasepulveda1895
      @tinasepulveda1895 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      EXACTLY as she was right there with The PROUD BOY'S and Oath Keepers on January 6th, 2021 while TRUMP was sitting in the dining room at The White House watching Fox News for 187 minute's. That's BS

    • @MaureenGreco-fq9xf
      @MaureenGreco-fq9xf 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Exactly

  • @marshasand8426
    @marshasand8426 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Then there should be a LOT of suits against the organizer of Jan 6 (#45).

  • @janinegrey6937
    @janinegrey6937 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +51

    How is this criminal, traitor, allowed to interact with SC?

  • @MrJohnblaine
    @MrJohnblaine 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +116

    Vote out as many Republicans in every levels of office next voting years.

  • @jimtokheim1422
    @jimtokheim1422 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +121

    I think we can simply ignore the “Supreme” court now. They are a joke.

    • @VerySadPenguin
      @VerySadPenguin 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      It's not only difficult but also irresponsible to ignore the court especially when it strips the rights of the American people.

    • @bearball49
      @bearball49 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Isn't that what Joe already does. They said no to canceling student debt. It certainly isn't fair that my taxes will go up to fund student debt relief. I did not attend college because I had no money. Not sure why the fuck Biden thinks these smart college graduates didn't know what they were signing. Bullshit.

    • @deanosborn3464
      @deanosborn3464 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      President Biden has already done so. They ruled he can't cancel student loan debt and Biden keeps doing it