Followup: Perpetual Motion. It STILL Can't Work!!!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 มิ.ย. 2022
- Here we go again. Here is a nine spoke overbalanced wheel design.
I spin it without ball bearings to show it spins freely.
Then put on the ball bearings and show it refuses to keep spinning in EITHER direction.
Over balanced wheels just can't work. Empirical proof. And we also know from thermodynamics.. no such thing as a perpetual motion machine.
Dear sir, you forget one important element in this perpetual motion experiment ...a 2 AA batteries hidden somewhere at the bottom 🤣🤣🤣
That hardest part of making a perpetual motion machine is finding somewhere to hide the motor.
The easier part to stop the search of perpetual motion is to be a critic
Funny comment but there is no batteries. And I don’t think that you even know what a perpetual motion machine is. The idea about it is that it gives it keeps it’s energy to make more energy to keep it moving (this is the idea behind it it’s not trying to me rude for no reason)
@@DiplomaticHawk bottom line it does not exist😅😅😅😅
@@DiplomaticHawkfrottement = pas de mouvement perpétuel.
Amicalement.
"Hardest part in a perpetual motion machine is hiding the battery" - Shun Zu
Dumb
He didn’t say this
I think the seller forget to send the bag of magnets with your package.
Or the the place to hide the batteries
What would magnets do to help this?
@@d.e.r.5009 If the ball bearings have magnetic property placing magnets in certain spots can attract the bearings but in order to power anything significant like a motor vehicle you'd need some very very high powered magnets and supercooling so probably liquid nitrogen or something incredibly dangerous, could you imagine getting into a wreck or blowing a gasket and then having liquid nitrogen splashing all over the place lmao
@Yanke Swet still won't work
@@d.e.r.5009 Magnets would help it work, without them, it's just a paper weight.
“In this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!” -Abraham Lincoln
Homer Simpson
Get your facts right
Jeez. You people are dense.
@@Whataboutseconddinner well then explain what I've missed.
@@londonoverground considering that there are 51 likes to my original comment, but only 2 people had to tell me why it was wrong tells all you need to know…
I thought you were gonna make it a infinite loop! ❤
Me too
it's impossible, perpetual motion does not exist
@@keqrou You can make an Illusion, but that's not what he's talking about.
@@1DjFuzzion1But keqrou WAS talking about what he was talking about...
Your doing the world a service sir.
what service? lol
Clearly he can demonstrate that that particular machine won’t work as intended. But there are so many others to debunk so I’d put him up there with all the people that debunk one flat-earth theory. …..but that’s pretty much how it gets done
I will never get this time back. 😔
??
What did you think was gonna happen?
@@DanielHaug I didn't know, but didn't think nothing would happen. 🤣
@@jamesr2624 """ ....I did not not know that thinking nothing would not never ever Happen !!!..""
@@NavinBetamax "We can know only that we know nothing. And that is the highest degree of human wisdom."
-Leo Tolstoy
I made something similar to this out of cardboard for a grade school science project. Came to the same conclusions 😊
I can't believe someone debated you about this.
“Hardest part about perpetual motion is my pen is”
- me
It's literally physically impossible to have perpetual motion.
I wish we could but there's no way even making a successful one will use the amount of power it creates to run itself
Sir it's simply impossible to create perpetual motion
Many years ago I saw an article about perpetual motion device of very similar design. I was fascinated about it and wanted to build one myself. But before doing the hard work, I created exact drawing model, measured the distance of the ball and created the vector model. Adding those vectors together end up being always zero.
A minute of silence for those who searched perpetual in amazon
The fact that you're trying to move it proves your point. If it worked, you wouldn't have to do anything!
実際にやってみるって大切。
貴重な映像を作っていただきありがとうございました。
The perpetual motion grifters are especially entertaining
yeah, perpetual motion doesn't work with not just this design but every design.
i know right
I feel very happy to know not everybody has that kind of attitude towards inventions in general, otherwise we would still not have stuff like internal combustion engines or modern electronics.
@@Spacekriek I agree
the reason why perpetual motions machine will never work is the same reason we've settled on combustion to provide energy @@Spacekriek
The UPPER room
Yea Ray, tell em bout the boom boom room 😎
I don’t wanna hear no mo shit about no fuckin boom boom room. Haha great scene
Ничего не получится! Центр массы всех шаров находится ниже точки вращения системы и нет такой силы, которая провернула бы этот центр масс вокруг оси вращения... В этой системе центр массы шариков - это обычный маятник!
@Filthy Peasant Nothing will work! The center of mass of all the balls is below the point of rotation of the system and there is no such force that would turn this center of mass around the axis of rotation... In this system, the center of mass of the balls is an ordinary pendulum!
if anybody is lookin for why, the ball bearings on the bottom on the outer rim of the circle have more leverage across the fulcrum than the ones in the top have being as close to the center as they are. The halves may be roughly equal in weight but the center of mass is below the point of rotation. also I'm just some random dude on the internet but that sounds pretty good to me idk have fun y'all kisses
You have to tip it on its side and spin it really fast and then set it up right
It can't work. You need MAGNETS. 😆
The mankind: perpetual motion is reliable.
...
The friction: hold my beer!!!
A co worker of mine was fairly intelligent but had dropped out of high school so he wasn't very educated. He started asking me physics question regarding leverage and such. He was being vague and secretive. After I promised not to tell anyone he brought a strange contraption to work in the back of his truck. It had a large spoked wheel with weights on the spokes. He had guides that would shift the weights towards the center on the way up and towards the outer on the way down. He had done such a great job that it would spin for a really long time with the slightest spin but he was confused why it would stop with the slightest resistance on the 'output shaft'. I was so amazed at the craftsmanship that I felt terrible telling him that his idea was against the laws of physics and the principles of energy transfer. It took a while to explain it to him but eventually he realized he was defeated and was pretty disappointed.
Here I thought you were going to argue it did work, and I was about to go off.
How nice that someone makes a video in which it is made clear that a perpetual motion machine can't work! It is really frightening that so many people are tinkering with "magnetic motors" etc., especially in countries that offer good scientific education! If they had paid attention in physics class when the law of conservation of energy was explained, they could have put a lot of wasted time to better use...
Well it’s never gonna work if you don’t turn the hidden motor on! 🤣
Nice video, Stephen. I think many people tend to think as far as their noses are long and usually try to conclude that perpetual motion is totally impossible by basing it on one particular, flawed design only. Imagine demonstrating an internal combustion engine to someone who has never seen something like that ever. However, for some reason someone took out the spark plugs and now you are trying to make it run. Try as you like, it will never work. Now, apply that scenario on simple designs like this wheel. We still need to add some stuff, some special ingredient before we have a proper perpetual device. A guy like Bessler found that special method or mechanism that made his wheels run spontaneously.
perpetual motion is not possible, energy will bleed in someway making it lose motion over time.
As a physics major all these perpetual motion claims drive me crazy.
I love how people overcomplicate the concept. Use as many bearings, magnets, crystals, gas, light, whatever. The central pivot has two surfaces that rub. Friction is the loss of energy. Meaning if the wheel is spinning, you are losing energy.
That axle Bearing is suspiciously large.
You could fit a tiny motor and batterys in there to make it work
I remember that wheel from novelty shop. But it was called as "Battery charger". It wouldn't work without AA batteries.
The weight leverage ratio from the center fulcrum is greatest when the balls are furthest from the fulcrum.
The greater weight of the balls hangs further from the center on the lower half of the wheel,stopping the rotation.
Where did you buy this wheel?
Thank you for share your experience 👌🙏🏻
You forgot to add the batteries. 😉
Some people still don't get it. The laws of physics can't be beaten
You really made it look like you didn't want it to work
For that machine to work, or simulate perpetual motion the way it should, you will need to reprint the wheel to be less oval shaped. Also seems like the axis might be off centered, but that could also be the imperfect circle shape of the machine.
The laws of thermodynamics already conclude that perpetual motion doesn´t work, no matter what design or approach you choose.
When you add a little motor at the backside it will perpetual move, until you switch off the electricity 😉
the reason is because you have them hitting at a point directly outward if you had a curve to the path of the ball it wouldn't fight the turning wheel as much, in laymen's terms you are throwing the weight wrong
Finally an honest poster.
You forgot to turn on the hidden motor.
Very cool demonstration!
Add 4 magnets:2 on the stand,2 on the wheel,15 degree pitch and polar opposite sides facing one another.Leave the bearings off,give it a small start to make the magnets pass once,and it’ll continue like a Sterling Engine.
You wanna move weight,get stronger magnets and play with the angle/pitch of the magnets,or something you can engage or disengage the magnetic inertia.
It's supposed to have curves to the track so the bearings are it constantly balanced motion, this design keeps the balls at one end of the track till its fully tilted then its shoots across. That is not a correct design. 👍
Even if the wheel wanted to spin, this guy didn't give the wheel freedom to spin 😂😂😂
I've built one myself too and it didn't stop like that immediately. The spokes can't be straight like that, they need to be curved. So that the ball goes slowly to the center, but fast outwards. It's still not perpetual, but it spins for some time
It would probably spin the best if it didn't have any balls in it and was just balanced.
The reason it does not perpetuate, is because;
The diameter is too small!
Try lighter ball bearings!
The axle to the wheel also needs bearings, to spin freely!
The geometric angle is wrong!
Try removing every other bearing!
(Instead of; every slot)
Perpetual motion machines;
do not work!
Great idea! (Got me thinking!)
Hmmm. What about the time and distance between the axis, and outter ring
If perpetual motion was possible, physics would break. The laws which would be broken would have terrible implications elsewhere. Such violations of these laws could open the door for other, unforeseeable things; like a creature which never needs to eat, photosynthesize, or look for chemicals.
If perpetual motion did work it would amount to a very efficient flywheel battery. The energy you take out would slow down the motion and the energy you put in would speed it up until it's spins so fast it basically explodes.
It works in an ideal world...where friction doesn't exist...
Also, if somehow you managed to make one that works as it's theorised, whenever you put a load on it, it will stop. Every power generating motor, when put on an electrical load, begins moving slower because of the resistance
Are the bearings causing the center of mass to be thrown off? I’m not the brightest but just like a wheel weight on a tire, if I balance the tire with uneven weight the tire wants to swing back and forth vs if it’s evenly weighted it doesn’t spin until force is applied. If I where trying this I would skip 2 spokes before applying the bearing limiting the weight in a pattern that would continuously spin the wheel without force applied. So add a bearing skip two and add another bearing?? Seems like once the bearings fall back towards the center it kills its motions to continue. Lmao idk but I love thinking about things like this! Someone who’s intelligent PLEASE explain this to me!!???? I really want to know.
Try placing bearing on 2 or 3 fin then skip 1 double bearing on last fin before skip. or
Double bearing on 1st fin single, skip, double,single skip
It's good that you posted this video however you shouldn't have edited it with that cut just after you drop the second ball bearing because it gives them room to believe that you are tricking them
you invented the perpetual stopping machine
When you get a new toy for your birthday and have to show it off.
Word on the street is his 8th grade science teacher as well as the janitor is still waiting for his volcano to erupt
BWAHAHAHAAA HAHAAAA.!!! 😂 😂 😂
Definitely isn't attending MIT
What if you put a heavier ball after and repeat,like one light ball one heavy and so on around the wheel.i see the following ball try to push the wheel when it contacts but doesnt have enough force to push it.
Energy input ratio output will be 1:1 So no gain
In the middle of each of the triangles you add a circle
⭕
This way as the bearings rotate each one is a degree further than the next. Let it go and watch it spin.
So the thing that obviously proves perpetual energy is not created needs done to spin it. You have to set the wheel correctly with 3-4 balls on interior and 3-4 balls on exterior directly across from the others. This of course is added energy kind of like twisting up a rubber band.
Curve the spokes in a slight s shape?
Thank God someone is showing the truth!
with a curved blade and a spring bumper you got something...the water weight design is good too...
science is awsome but don t give them any bad ideas...
they got enough of those...
thank...
The Hardest part of perpetual motion is overcoming the laws of thermodynamics
You are supposed to take some off the wheel one at a time until it starts being s
Able to keep the wheel slinging or to start with them in an certain arrangement
What if you off set the balance? 2 seperate points of balance?
I cannot believe a man would hide tiny brakes on a perpetual motion machine just prove it doesn’t work.
Delicately my friend. Let it fall into it's rhythm. It'll work.
If it was truly perpetual motion, it would start itself!
The idea was that the balls far away from the center give more power but they didn't think abput that there are one more ball on the other side.
Perpetual motion machines need to do more than just move this is why they are impossible they need to have a way to capture the energy.... None of them do this because capturing the energy destroys the possibility of perpetual motion
People have been trying for 100's of years to create perpetual motion machines. Still hasn't happened for anything useful.
the component that you have right now without the ball bearings there's a weight to it already so therefore when you put the others it will not move the way according to what we want it to move because there's already a weight to the device from the beginning that offsets the weight.
It's like a wireless mouse or keyboard. There are people who don't know they need batteries!!
I think my car went into perpetual motion. It was perfect but since pandemic hit that went straight from daily driving to perpetual motion. Well if you really wanna know there’s no motion you get the idea. Now I perfectly understand why. I needed to pay attention in school but meh never too late to learn!
Doesn't it depend on the time and the distance you have dropped the ball bearing from?
Typical statement from a perpetuum developer: I'm almost done, I'm just working on a little thing!
Issac Newton:
"300 years and you idiots have learned nothing!"
Where do I start?
This makes me feel like he is under the impression it "could" work with another design. Are you in the market for a lightly used bridge, sir? Got one on sale right now haha
Drill holes in the bearings and use streight spokes and fit them to the spokes, The G-force will put all bearings out to the rim when spinning, And when stopped close to the center
Something tells me that those believe in perpetual motion, are still waiting for a handout.
For starters Ball Bearings don't like fairous wheels.
Right now you're just pissin' them off
Perpetual motion does not work
Planet earth, hold my beer
The person who know thermodynamics
Pop Pop had too much caffeine again and stole all the kids toys.
Still liked and subscribed though.
Sorry, those are not ball bearings, they are steel balls. A bearing has an inner and outer race or at least a service that bears the load.
The wheel was a paid actor
The wheel would work alot better if the slides where the ball bearings are, weren't so long. If they were only big enough to slide a tiny bit, it would work better.
No, it's not possible to create a perpetual motion machine that operates indefinitely without an external energy source. This violates the fundamental laws of thermodynamics, particularly the conservation of energy.
Not just with this design, but with any design! Physics does not allow processes that have efficiency >=1
So if you were to spin fast enough to get bearings to move out to end of travel...it would spin until friction slowed it enough for the bearings to roll back to center...then if would stop
Someone should try this but arch the spokes so they fall earlier adding more weight to the downward motion.
The laws of thermodynamics already proved that over 200 year ago, but thanks anyway.
You’re supposed to put the metal bearings in a way that defies the laws of thermodynamics.
Weight + counter weight = no movement as everything including inertia is cancelled out - no matter how the physics is altered - it is the very dynamic problem : conservation of energy - kinetic energy is always converted into friction, heat - which are losses that cause the resultant motion to cease - if not additional energy is put into the system -