How to calculate LOD and LOQ?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 21

  • @michaelg362
    @michaelg362 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    for a guy who watches videos at 2X speed the theme music was quite odd lol but the content was just what I needed. Thank you :)

  • @jeremyrodas4856
    @jeremyrodas4856 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    came for the explanation, stayed for the tune.

  • @Belacollege
    @Belacollege 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent video.I learnt step by step and got value.Thank you for posting very informative video.

  • @Xun_Mei
    @Xun_Mei 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank youuu, you are better than chatgpt :)

  • @aureaflatschart4176
    @aureaflatschart4176 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excelent !!!!!!! Thank You very very much for your class.

  • @DietervanderWesthuizen
    @DietervanderWesthuizen 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Dear Sir. I am confused. I thought that the STEYX function (standard error of the y-values for each x-value) returns the standard deviation already. Is this standard error in this case scenario not the same as standard deviation? If so, I think one should NOT use the formula sd=SE*SQRT(N). Please confirm.

  • @SohelRanaEngineer
    @SohelRanaEngineer 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Could you tell me where did get the formula SD of intercept?

  • @norouziparviz8085
    @norouziparviz8085 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Here is the question: is it possible to measure the concentrations lower than LOQ? if not, why, here, the first point of this calibration curve is lower than the calculated LOQ (1.2)?

    • @chemist_isi
      @chemist_isi  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I put approximate numbers. It is the only for the description of the excel procedure.

    • @norouziparviz8085
      @norouziparviz8085 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@chemist_isi Even, if you omit the first number, still you will get LOQ higher than the first point of the curve. There is something wrong here.

  • @sangavimurugesan2627
    @sangavimurugesan2627 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you so much!! that was very helpful!

  • @c.melekakcay
    @c.melekakcay 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you 🧡

  • @Al3k5and3r
    @Al3k5and3r 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    more samples = more deviation (because of sqrt*n), higher LOD and less precision? is it have any sence? More samples = better precision in classical statistic....

  • @soulminivlog
    @soulminivlog 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Standard deviation of blank ??

  • @SohelRanaEngineer
    @SohelRanaEngineer 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I don't think it's a right method to calculate LOD and LOQ? Standard deviation calculation totally confusing. I have LDI MS peaks intensity in low concentration values. How can I calculate SD, LOD and LOQ?

  • @sparkanalytics6819
    @sparkanalytics6819 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Video is very good. But audio is very irritating...

  • @alondraescoto5819
    @alondraescoto5819 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much!!!!!!!!!!

    • @chemist_isi
      @chemist_isi  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you also. It is pleasure for me.

  • @francoisburgay9002
    @francoisburgay9002 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I don't think is the right way to calculate LOD and LOQ. I tried with real samples and the calculated LOD is higher than one standard that the instrument actually read.

    • @chemist_isi
      @chemist_isi  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      th-cam.com/video/vQVCM9fb_q8/w-d-xo.html