The non-wealthy men are totally shafted in the same scenario, end up without custody, paying child support, and having the ex lie to the kids about who it is that can’t control themselves. The opposite of justice
I think there is such state laws but they never charge and enforce such a law because it is almost impossible to get a conviction. So they just let it go.
I'm just shocked how many people have to be involved, how much effort, time and money need to be spent just because one person false statement. Mind-blowing.
that would be dangerous ...if you fail to get a conviction this is not the same as falsely claiming ..BUT it means you could be tried ...it would not be a good idea
Love when lawyers ask the same questions 6-7 times - and continue when they are not happy with the responses. How difficult is it to understand NO means NO.
To say Amber Heard is a victim is quit funny, when pretty much everyone that has testified thus far, exposed her lies, and her abusive, exaggerating behavior
I absolutely believe AH is the abuser…but TBF, all of the witnesses thus far have been Johnny’s witnesses. I would expect all of their testimonies to be backing up his claims. But yes, AH and her team are flailing.
This is a complete waste of police resources. It seems the place is clean and organised. It is a domestic dispute. If they do not cooperate and there’s no signs of DV injury, what do you want the police to do? If anyone fears for life, it seems her friends is not concerned, uncooperative and wants to get rid of the cops as quickly as they can. Falsely claimed of DV by someone and her accomplice should be charged.
c'mon...they were super lazy. they didn't identify the ppl in the room, they didn't search the premises for other ppl on location. didn't ask ANY questions on the timeline of the calls, who called, if they were still here, ask for the timestamp on the phone...whatever. this is absolute minimum duty to cover their asses to close the call as soon as possible and not file any report. we can only see this because, out of 1 million cases, this went public. they never expected this to be seen. its kinda worrying if you think about it. imagine you calling the cops for something and they come like this on location while its still going on, but you can't talk because the assailant is in the back with the kids.
@@TNM001 uh no. 4th ammendment protections: police don't have a right to search your home just because one person made a claim, then refused to cooperate. No cooperation, no signs of violence. Done and done.
She didn’t press charges though. So she can’t get in trouble for reporting a false crime. If she pressed charges against him for DV when there was none then yes, but even then it’s hard to prove. This is a civil case for defamation cause she told the public he was abusive
@@TNM001 ?? The officers were there, asked questions, separated the male and females so that maybe the females can be more comfortable talking to female officers. No one was cooperative including AH's friends, they won't even mention who's the husband. AH's friend was the one leading the officer around to do a protective sweep to see if there was someone else in the penthouse. They left after noticing there was no sign of injury or crimes. They do, however, notice that AH has been crying. One of the officers left a name card just in case they changed their mind.
@@mediumchungus9662 ah no. if they are called on location and they have reasonable doubt they can search everything as they please. no cooperation in such a situation is perfect reasonable doubt btw. what you can do is claim later in court that what they found is not admissable...well good luck ;) so, the opposite of what you said.
I wish there were more cops like this one. He just says what happened, doesn’t seem biased The lawyer asks the questions in an accusatory manner. His answers are honest and rational.
Im confused , how many officers they need already to tell them she's lying .. !! .. And why they still treat her like she's the victim .. That's hilarious
This has gotta be horrible to go through for Johnny. To have your private life on public display. Unfortunately, this is what has to happen to protect yourself from false allegations.
False Accusations if proven to be blatantly false need to be prosecuted. If there is no consequence for making false accusations then they will continue to be uttered. This is a cautionary tale to make sure that you vet anyone vigorously before commitment or you could easily end up in a similar situation.
If prosecutors can prove a false police report was made, they do prosecute. All the time. I don't know why people think they don't. My friend's father was punished for his false report re some fire and car insurance scam. It's a myth that prosecutors don't.
Hello? Look around you…false accusations that can be proven false happen everyday. Check out Main Stream Media (aka Entertainment journalists in America.)
@@None-685 it's been done to me. When your not there they go to court and have emergency tro written up to be proven or dropped later. All they have to do is make a claim, that's it.
@@johnnycee5179 and yet in Texas i couldn’t get a protective order against my bf (at the time) ex gf who tried to run me over with her car. The law is so broken.
Looks like her friends maybe didn’t want the gravy train to end? He was so generous with the penthouses for her friends and many others at no cost to them.
Considering all the actual serious incidents of domestic violence and the effects of that on thousands of women (and men), it is disgraceful that she called and wasted police time on trivia and then refused to co operate
@Lynda Dods This is common among certain people who use police and the threat of calling police as a tool of control. It's usually women who do this, of course, and not infrequently mothers who use this to control teenage children.
I’m glad that Johnny is finally getting to speak the truth and that the evidence and multiple witness testimony speaks for itself and exposes her calculated efforts to set him up. I’m glad her friends are being publicly exposed. I hope they are held accountable in ways that matter.
As someone who actually has been a victim of extreme domestic violence. I can assure you that had the cops been to speak with me not just once but twice I would not have let them leave without telling them and showing them what took place. And asking them to help get me protected.
It's very dangerous to be involved in these destructive relationships. Restraining Orders mean nothing to psychopaths who WILL find their victims. Families talk inadvertently if someone runs away for self protection. Get your own demons fixed first and THEN find a mature person who's done their own work!
As someone with little experience with domestic violence (depending on definitions), I wonder why you would ask the police to get you get protected twice. Why not do it yourself by picking up your belongings and leave. Or replace the lock and make him leave? Why twice? Never minds, I know people respond differently in different circumstances and have a tendency to normalize certain behaviors. I know people stay in abusive relationships for a number of reasons, and I know that when others call the police, the victims may be reluctant to tell what happened. What is true is also true for Johnny Depp: why not report to the police? Personally, l think they had an a very, very unhealthy relationship. And indeed, Amber Heard seems not very pleasant, and rather fake. Then again, JD starting taping conversations, not very pleasant either. I can imagine they spiraled out of control.
@@hamster4618 she was recording him long before he started recording her… I’m glad he did because we all get to see the real Amber…. They had a toxic relationship BUT I don’t believe it was because Johnny…. I think Johnny loved her so much and tried to help her and he couldn’t…
There she is, writing non stop like Jodi Arias. Pretending to write legal arguments like she has any leg to stand on. They are so similar it is horrifying to be perfectly honest.
I posted this the other day. So true. They both thought they were smarter than everyone else in the room. And their own evidence will be the downfall (Jodi’s photos, Amber’s recordings).
Finally some one mentioned that Jodi. First time I saw Amer I felt it's the same character with the same evil manipulative personality and the project of a killer to be 😥
She should have been charged for wasting the time and resources of these officers and 911 dispatch. She wanted the cops to come out so there would be record of police visits but she didn't think about how they would record it and testify to it being false/fake calls. I'm pretty sure that's illegal in my state, she'd have been arrested and charged for sure. You think it would be illegal in all states to prank call 911.
Johnny's privacy is completely violated. Amber and her insanity brought the cops, psychologists, psychiatrists, medical doctors and now the whole world into his home. Sad.
I firmly believe this isn’t about money. Johnny needs to let his employers - and his fans - know that he tried to take the high road, but with Amber, it backfired.
I agree. I think it has nothing to do with money. I think it is all about Amber’s need to get the last word, thus her defamatory op ed in the paper. If she had just divorced him peacefully and let that be, she wouldn’t be being sued. This is all connected to Amber’s mental health issues. Keep in mind she tried to get Johnny to drop this suit many times, but he wanted to clear his name.
all the time and money he is spending on this... He is doing this for himself, because being branded something you are not something really terrible Is an awful awful thing to go through. I hope he can heal through this process.
If there had been ANY injury, and the alleged perpetrator was no longer there, the cops have been out twice, the victim would be screaming down the roof for help. These cops ( I know, my daughter is one) see so much real and truly horrific stuff, asking them about her alleged injuries is ridiculous. They would know.
Absolutely would recognize red complexion from possible heightened blood pressure-due to an argument & crying eyes vs some kinds of drug use or injury. This makes me wonder if they just wrote this off as rich people silly problems as compared to the rest of the population. Cops are addressing real dangerous situations, in addition to this situation. Due to having to attend an argument between wealthy people possible delays occur in attending serious situations, such a waste of resources & taxpayer $. One question was why no photos to prove no damage. If the cops did this in calls to arguments if other situations w/o apparent property damage what a waste of good $$. The budgets for policing is constantly reported as being insignificant.
@@kathypiazza4567 in our city, bodycams go on each and every time an officer exits their unit. The second set of cops did the right thing by going ahead and entering the apartment despite that guy trying to stop them at the door. Every case of alleged dv must be checked out.
DV situations are also very dangerous for the officers because there is at least one person who is already violent and volatile. It also means going into a home where you don't know what kind of weapons etc may be present and rarely is it approached with a SWAT like response (there are exceptions of course). I had to make calls as a child witnessing DV and had to speak to the officers both on the phone and in person. The officers even stayed there while we packed to go to a family members house and escorted us there. Even in the 90s they took this very seriously.
I truly don’t understand the line of questioning of the defense attorney. I am not a lawyer but all the questions the defense attorney is asking seems to be incriminating her client 🤷♀️
She’s exactly like spoiled teenager like the butler testified. Always calling the police and wasting their time to come out there for nothing. She’s totally an attention hungry lunatic. Have to cause big drama and make all this noise.
Amber‘s lawyer is allowed to say things like “you never saw anything on Amber’s face did you?”… and “you went to the residence to check on Amber because of the previous call right not because she called again right? “. And that’s not leading the witness. But if Deb’s lawyer was to say “why did you go to the residence“ they would object and say “objection, leading the witness“. And it would be sustained. He’s lucky there’s so much proof that she is a maniac because that is so unfair and ridiculous. I hope her attorney never gets another job after this.
I know!! Each time I wonder why Depp’s lawyers aren’t objecting. The only reason I can think of is for likability which Amber and her lawyers have completely lost from viewers.
Plus, because they are getting use to the objections and getting their way, when the objections come from depps lawyers in cross examination, they will get stunned locked and start stuttering
With each passing day I can’t help what wonder how AH is going to explain all of this once she is on the stand? No evidence of Johnny hurting her, but lots of evidence that she’s a fraud. Her case is beyond hopeless.
I literally cannot see how Johnny cannot win this case. All I can see is her lies being exposed minute by minute - it’s rather embarrassing, I bet even her legal team know they’re on a sinking ship trying to defend her.
He can lose his defamation claim because this suit is specifically about the op-ed she wrote but it never mentioned him by name. They need to prove that it was clear enough that she was referring to him and that damage came as a direct result of that particular article and not before. Thats how he can lose. This suit is not about who the actually abuser was.
The case isn't about whether or not he was the abuser or she was though. It's about loss of income due to Amber's Allegations and defamation. His side needs to prove loss of income due to the particular story she posted in the media that they feel was the catalyst to him losing his jobs etc. And even though it seems cut and dry it's a bit more technical in a legal sense because she didn't actually mention him directly in the article. I don't think it matters if he wins the case or not. I think the most important thing is he has redeemed his reputation in the public and future employment opportunities. He won't be seen as a brand risk.
While it is true that the point of suing AH is to prove that her accusations cost him his career and reputation, I think that ultimately JD just wants to clear his name and to prove to the public that he is not a wife beater/abuser- whether he wins or not. He even said it in his testimony. But I do hope and pray he wins bc he does not deserve all of this :(
They first have to prove that her statement of surviving DV is false. Since she obtained a TRO sitting this incident and 2 others, he has to prove that she lied. She also cited a timeline in that article, so you can easily Google the year and her or JDs name and it will bring up all the articles and pictures associated with the TRO. She didn't out right put his name because she didn't need to 1)it was widely publicized previously so people already know that's who she's talking about, possibly the only thing they know her for 2)She still included enough details for a reasonable person to be able to deduce who she was writing about.
Despite all the evidence supporting Johnny I still have the bad feeling in the back of my head of Johnny not winning the case or even if he does win, Amber's career will relatively remain in tact short term thanks to her gender.
@@kirby5550 I don’t think her career will be in tact, but I’m concerned about Johnny winning the case since defamation cases are among the hardest to prove
The honest truth is Johnny has already achieved what he set out to do. In laying out what happened for all to see the court of public opinion is swayed well and truly back in his favour, hopefully he will start to get movies again.
So far very strong, however it isn’t 100% clear Johnny didn’t finally snap & hit her. During questioning the island manager AH’s Lawyer included in a question “AH Thew the can of mineral spirits, that hit JD’s face/bridge of his nose, to SLOW JD DOWN” from his charging at her, in self defence. Trying to indicate it wasn’t even a return volley in response to J’s throwing things at A or that AH once again angrily threw a heavy can at J. The lawyer didn’t try here to say A was throwing stuff around it in the general direction of JD. JD’s telling of this incident is that AH deliberately aimed & threw a can at JD’s face. I think the art supplies are a representation of an activity that distracts JD from a constant interaction or adoration of AH. I’d bet if he always & only painted portraits of AH she’d have thrown something else. Her mental illness makes her need to be the centre of every aspect of her life, including all with JD. She dislikes him jamming - if she is there she’s only watching not partaking & a primary participant, so she hates it. Poor JD & poor AH, I hope she continues with mental health experts to treat her & JD gets good grief, trauma & addiction Therapy & can make more Pirates movies & many more roles, as soon as this case is settled. She should be fired from future films until she is stable.
@@lynne18ish Hollyweird is odd for a reason. Don’t believe me, research. 90% of “A” listers are practicing Satanists. Look for the one eye symbol and 5 pointed star. I am not kidding . You can find it all on the internet, especially photos. Please do not mistake me for a religious nut. I am not. I do believe in digging up hidden truths.
I'm not sure what the defense is trying to prove here? They showed up after a call and found nothing and left. Okay, if anything this helps Johnny since it seems to show that after an argument, nobody was hurt and Amber didn't seem interested in doing anything about it or even seemed particularly upset.
It corresponds with what the psychologist said, people with this personality disorder often threaten to phone the police if their partner wants to leave the house and often do so, they often even hurt themselves trying to stop their partner from leaving the house. As was evident from Ambers other recording, she simply refuses to let Johnny just leave when he said he has had enough of her incessant carrying on with Johnny for hours about nothing. Fact also here is that Amber told the police herself that nothing was wrong, that is the testimony to take away from this. Women like these often drive their nails into their partners trying to stop them to leave, forcing the partner to push them away with force, in such a case the domestic violence is from the woman and the man is acting in self defence, if the woman falls and hurts herself that is her problem as the man was acting in self defence to get away from the unlawfull attack on him. Men do however not call the police and tell of domestic violence when a woman drives their nails into their arms and scratches them seriously, men are often use to taking a beating, they'll just put a bandage on and carry on.
I believe they were trying to descredit the officer, as to invalidate their testimony under the excuse that they did not do all the necessary procedures to verify the incident
@@silverdoeGirl oh i didn’t realize it was pre recorded. if that’s the case it’s already come into evidence and if d’s team had an issue with it they would’ve raised it during motions in limine prior to cross but they either didn’t, or they tried, and the judge said no
Omg, there wasn't any injuries. The house was fine.. The call from her friend in NY was the same thing.... That's what I hate about lawyers, they beat a dead horse. 3 cops have said all the same thing. No injuries, no damage to house.
Objection-Asked and Answered a million times! This is a secondary responder. He does not have to conduct an investigation. He did not have to look at the caller because the first responders already conducted an investigation. Unless they see the place in disarray, there is no reason for this officer to so more than what he did.
After binge watching body language videos, the person answering the door displayed obvious reluctance to open the door. It’s true the dogs were there, but the entire floor is private and it should not be a problem for dogs to run about. No, the man at the door was nervous and suspicious and the police man immediately responded to that by asking to go inside. Upvote for the second responding officer.
No she isn’t. This isn’t a criminal case it’s civil so you don’t need to establish truth beyond a reasonable doubt. You have to show whether ‘ on the probabilities’ something occured. It’s a much lower standard than reasonable doubt.
I'm getting really Confused! Is Amber's lawyer testifying on behalf of Johnny Depp? Because every time she asks a witness anything they keep denying that they saw anything in terms of domestic violence or any bruises lol well Amber's lawyer is sure doing a good job helping Johnny Depp
This is a circus! Even her lawyers know she is not telling the truth , they don’t know what else to do! He drinks? Yes! He has his days o moments? Yes! He told her to end things in a civil way? Yes!!!!!!! For all actors and famous people, DONT GET MARRIED JUST LIKA THAT!
I believe she set him up from the beginning she never loved him and is a lesbian she used him to get fame and researched his likes dislikes taste in music the rare obscure jazz music etc she set Johnny up for him to fall for her and marry her "they had so much in common" and all her friends and family living off Johnny enjoying the high life living in his penthouses taking advantage ! Disgusting
That lawyer doesn’t seem like she has anything. She thinks that by asking the same question 20 times over that she will get a different result. If I was on that jury I would despise the sound of her voice at this point. 🤮
This looks like a situation where Amber wanted the police to "see" injuries and make a report without her saying or doing anything. It's as though she wanted to be able to say "I didn't ask for the report; the police saw the injury and made the report" and look forgiving and pious in the press. Why call the police twice and then still not want to make a statement? The guest in the house said Johnny had been gone for 2 hours so there was no additional argument between them, but there was a second call. At this point, I wouldn't put it pass Amber to hit and scratch herself. I want to see the 911 log. Were these duplicate calls around the same time or there was a time gap between the calls.
He didn’t go in, he didn’t investigate so how does his evidence prove anything either way. What a waste of police time, real crimes are being committed while this woman is setting up her husband.
Attempting to accuse the officers of failings along with every other witness to nothing happening or injuries present to AH is becoming sad and tiresome for this case to drag along now. It favours JD seemingly and hopefully, but how can AH’s legal team continually from a professional standpoint be given this much rope to hang with? Is everybody in a conspiracy against AH🙄
Nobody but Heard and her legal team are in a conspiracy against Johnny. Looks like the public and his own team, friends, family are very much looking at things from his perspective.
Maybe they doing so to count the dollars bills they will send her to pay for the work they done. You should know, as they are dragging for so long is maybe they release their incompetence and it’s looking bad for them so it’s better to continue to get more paychecks incase if they don’t get any other clients to represent.
I would really like to know what kind of record these lawyers of her have. They are incredibly aggressive and grating. Just straight up rude for no reason. Everyone I’ve spoken with has said these lawyers have made them think she is guilty even when they hadn’t prior to the trial.
The only thing I can say to her lawyers is, when you trying to defend a liar takes a lot to cover up a liar and as you covering that liar you’re actually exposing the truth I’m so sorry for her lawyers.
No wine on the floor in the hall at that time (something on the floor by the elevator?), no bottle broken or spilled on the floor in the apartment, uncooperative, confirms IO was in New York when they made the call to 911 contradicting both Amber and IOs claims
@@helloworld441 IO was a friend of Amber's who regularly stayed at their loft in L.A. IO identifies as a gender fluid individual. IO is the person who Amber was on a call to and told to call 911 on the occasion when the cops arrived to investigate a call reporting a domestic disturbance. IO claimed to be in L.A at the time of the call, claims Amber said J.D was hitting her and that they heard J.D throw Amber's phone, and claimed to have gone to the the apartment to comfort Amber, yet was in New York, as confirm by the conversation on the police body camera... In the argument with J.D on that occasion, J.D claims he told IO on the phone "You can have her" referring to Amber, as J.D suspected IO was attracted to Amber at the time
I feel bad for all the policemen, doctors and nurses whose time has been waisted by Amber’s lawyers asking the same question in 20 different forms for hours 😝! I am sure they have more important things to do!
Like your going to call the cops and act like nothing happened when they get there. I lived for 16 years in an abusive relationship and when I finally got the nerve to call the police they helped me.
* 18:39 that was a VERY leading question! This testimony seems more damaging to her than to him. She’s the one using spilled wine and broken picture frames as evidence to substantiate a domestic violence allegation. 🤷♀️ * False accusers should definitely receive the sentence the person they’re accusing would have been sentenced with if it were true. It’d make these gold digging, five minutes of fame seekers think twice at the very least!
@@joupton9908 yesss this is what I’m worried about. ugh with all this evidence, I still feel like the law will favor her more 😭I just wanna fast forward to the end of may
She got really careful with her questions while suggesting a lot. "Did you use your flashlight to see if person y has injuries? implying there was even an injury. She does not ask anymore: "Did you see any injury?" which can be clearly denied.
Anyone who exposes themselves to Hollywood movies and mainstream news is subject to the exact same tactics regarding everything from false science to fictional history. These are evil tactics to promote lies.
I don't see the point in interrogating all these cops for so long, Same questions 50 times, Same answers 50 times. Justice in the US can be very very patient when the accused are rich...
Sigh I know Amber heard's lawyer is doing her job but it's just so pathetic she should settle I know he's suing her for a large sum but she's washed up in Hollywood she's still trying to push the JD hit her defense it's just pathetic 🙄
Why doesn't Johnny's team ask if they could tell if Amber could have used blush to attempt to create damage to her face. No difference than ask a bunch of questions about a damaged face nobody noticed.
Ya probably, but when AH gets on the stand it would be great if they asked her even if it was to be stricken from the record. The Jury could still hear it and wonder😂
Because they don't need to reach like her team is doing, they have evidence on their side and there's not a single witness who even ever saw so much as a scratch on her. Stooping to their level would just have the opposite effect and make him look guilty, they should stick purely to the facts and not try manipulative tactics out of desperation like AH...
I just wish AHs friend would fess up and testify that she was making it all up! But then again they were all living off JD and probably did not want to jeopardize the rent free penthouses, trips, parties etc. They should all be liable!
Good God man , this is a 💩 show. Why is it so hard to believe this woman is a narcissist and didn't get enough attention that she thought she deserved, and proceeded to try and ruin a mans reputation? Her body language and facial expressions show it all . She won't get her Grammy for this performance, for sure. Also, I believe Johnny should make a movie out of this , because you can't make this stuff up 💯👍
Wow. Awesome to see these cops doing their job to the T. Even during calls like these it's so important to do the little things. Amber Heard lawyers are trash if they thought this video would do something
To think that she wasn't just abusive to Johnny but to most of their relations(friends, workers, neighbors, colleagues) shows you the kind of person that woman is. Imagine inviting a friend for dinner when such a spiteful person is around. Forgive me 4 putting it out there, half of the men I know would be on death row if they see their blood on the floor. Johnny is the most self controlled addict I've ever seen
Her attorneys are just like her rude and snarky. She was barking at a police officer who is just doing his job which turned out to be wasting his time when needed elsewhere because her client lied and was trying to set up her husband !
![กี่หมื่นฟ้า | Your Sky Series EP.1 [2/4]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/qJbQs_nhjD4/mqdefault.jpg)
Johnny Depp is fortunate to have the money to show what really happened. How many lives are ruined by false accusations.Sad
Yes!
Very valid point !
If he wins it will be more applicable later in new cases
The non-wealthy men are totally shafted in the same scenario, end up without custody, paying child support, and having the ex lie to the kids about who it is that can’t control themselves. The opposite of justice
@@lemaxou2039 "new cases" that is if anyone has money to fight said new case.
There should be a law that gives jail time to people if it’s proven that they falsely claim to be victims of domestic violence. 💯
There is
I think there is such state laws but they never charge and enforce such a law because it is almost impossible to get a conviction. So they just let it go.
I'm just shocked how many people have to be involved, how much effort, time and money need to be spent just because one person false statement. Mind-blowing.
Or make the punishment instant...and the cop allows you one punch to the phoney victims face ...why clog up the court system !!?
that would be dangerous ...if you fail to get a conviction this is not the same as falsely claiming ..BUT it means you could be tried ...it would not be a good idea
Love when lawyers ask the same questions 6-7 times - and continue when they are not happy with the responses. How difficult is it to understand NO means NO.
Yes, and kudos to the police officers for keeping their cool in answering. Because the lawyer's manner verges on offensive.
What color was his hear???
Bodycam should be mandatory, both for officer safety and public safety
Yeah i truly dont know why its not law in all states. Bodycam off takes any liability away it seems for police force
I believe it is now.
The police officer didn't Do His job!!!!!!
Cameras have very good memories.
It is in England UK xx
To say Amber Heard is a victim is quit funny, when pretty much everyone that has testified thus far, exposed her lies, and her abusive, exaggerating behavior
I absolutely believe AH is the abuser…but TBF, all of the witnesses thus far have been Johnny’s witnesses. I would expect all of their testimonies to be backing up his claims. But yes, AH and her team are flailing.
How did Johnny lose his other case?
And Diagnostic evidence of mental illness.
@@ghostfacethrilla5012 I believe it's because they didn't have a jury, different laws in California, and maybe the Judge was bias
@@ghostfacethrilla5012 People with great power out in UK didn't want to look like Jack-Asses and did him dirty, TWICE!
This is a complete waste of police resources.
It seems the place is clean and organised.
It is a domestic dispute. If they do not cooperate and there’s no signs of DV injury, what do you want the police to do?
If anyone fears for life, it seems her friends is not concerned, uncooperative and wants to get rid of the cops as quickly as they can.
Falsely claimed of DV by someone and her accomplice should be charged.
c'mon...they were super lazy. they didn't identify the ppl in the room, they didn't search the premises for other ppl on location.
didn't ask ANY questions on the timeline of the calls, who called, if they were still here, ask for the timestamp on the phone...whatever.
this is absolute minimum duty to cover their asses to close the call as soon as possible and not file any report.
we can only see this because, out of 1 million cases, this went public. they never expected this to be seen. its kinda worrying if you think about it.
imagine you calling the cops for something and they come like this on location while its still going on, but you can't talk because the assailant is in the back with the kids.
@@TNM001 uh no. 4th ammendment protections: police don't have a right to search your home just because one person made a claim, then refused to cooperate. No cooperation, no signs of violence. Done and done.
She didn’t press charges though. So she can’t get in trouble for reporting a false crime. If she pressed charges against him for DV when there was none then yes, but even then it’s hard to prove. This is a civil case for defamation cause she told the public he was abusive
@@TNM001 ?? The officers were there, asked questions, separated the male and females so that maybe the females can be more comfortable talking to female officers. No one was cooperative including AH's friends, they won't even mention who's the husband. AH's friend was the one leading the officer around to do a protective sweep to see if there was someone else in the penthouse. They left after noticing there was no sign of injury or crimes. They do, however, notice that AH has been crying. One of the officers left a name card just in case they changed their mind.
@@mediumchungus9662 ah no. if they are called on location and they have reasonable doubt they can search everything as they please. no cooperation in such a situation is perfect reasonable doubt btw.
what you can do is claim later in court that what they found is not admissable...well good luck ;)
so, the opposite of what you said.
I wish there were more cops like this one.
He just says what happened, doesn’t seem biased
The lawyer asks the questions in an accusatory manner.
His answers are honest and rational.
One thing---it's not a "domestic violence call," it's a "claim of domestic violence call." Huge difference.
Pay attention to the lawyers questions. She is trying to get them to admit to something that isnt there.
The cops say there was no injuries, the witness says there was no injuries. Maybe there was no injuries.
If it quacks like a duck...
But....but....there has to be. Lol
Most irregular
😆
It was the make up that launched the year after that masked everything
Im confused , how many officers they need already to tell them she's lying .. !! .. And why they still treat her like she's the victim .. That's hilarious
as many as it takes to try get their cut of the $100 million dollars.
She's paying them.
@@lettiegrant9447 Well... no: Elon Musk is ; )
Aren’t Elon Musk afraid he will be the next victim?
@@jole2994 I don't think so , she can't handle that one .
This has gotta be horrible to go through for Johnny. To have your private life on public display. Unfortunately, this is what has to happen to protect yourself from false allegations.
False Accusations if proven to be blatantly false need to be prosecuted. If there is no consequence for making false accusations then they will continue to be uttered. This is a cautionary tale to make sure that you vet anyone vigorously before commitment or you could easily end up in a similar situation.
There is consequences. On many occasions, people have spent jail time due to false accusations.
she never made a police report, there is nothing to criminally prosecute.
If prosecutors can prove a false police report was made, they do prosecute. All the time. I don't know why people think they don't. My friend's father was punished for his false report re some fire and car insurance scam. It's a myth that prosecutors don't.
The little boy that cried wolf
Hello? Look around you…false accusations that can be proven false happen everyday. Check out Main Stream Media (aka Entertainment journalists in America.)
She or her friends(s) called cops but she would never cooperate, no bruises, marks or swelling. She has nothing.
@@None-685 it's been done to me. When your not there they go to court and have emergency tro written up to be proven or dropped later. All they have to do is make a claim, that's it.
@@johnnycee5179 and yet in Texas i couldn’t get a protective order against my bf (at the time) ex gf who tried to run me over with her car. The law is so broken.
@@PneumaNoose it seems like the law anymore is set up to protect whoever pays the most, in many cases.
Looks like her friends maybe didn’t want the gravy train to end? He was so generous with the penthouses for her friends and many others at no cost to them.
@@PneumaNoose Just a guess but would requirements be different in Texas than other States?
Her lawyers are grasping. They are trying their best but they know they don’t have a case. It’s hysterical actually.
Considering all the actual serious incidents of domestic violence and the effects of that on thousands of women (and men), it is disgraceful that she called and wasted police time on trivia and then refused to co operate
Legit question. Why did you have to put men in parentheses? Why not just say. "Women and men"?
@@CRAM079 probably because in this case it was AH who wasted the police officers time and resources
@@CRAM079 you already know why... effed up, right?
Well as we all know Sociopaths, narcissistic people don't care about anyone but themselves.
@Lynda Dods This is common among certain people who use police and the threat of calling police as a tool of control. It's usually women who do this, of course, and not infrequently mothers who use this to control teenage children.
I’m glad that Johnny is finally getting to speak the truth and that the evidence and multiple witness testimony speaks for itself and exposes her calculated efforts to set him up. I’m glad her friends are being publicly exposed. I hope they are held accountable in ways that matter.
As someone who actually has been a victim of extreme domestic violence. I can assure you that had the cops been to speak with me not just once but twice I would not have let them leave without telling them and showing them what took place. And asking them to help get me protected.
Especially if the "abuser" was not around when the cops are there.
So every other woman who passes through the same would do the same? Everyone has it's own way to deal with same situations.
It's very dangerous to be involved in these destructive relationships. Restraining Orders mean nothing to psychopaths who WILL find their victims. Families talk inadvertently if someone runs away for self protection. Get your own demons fixed first and THEN find a mature person who's done their own work!
As someone with little experience with domestic violence (depending on definitions), I wonder why you would ask the police to get you get protected twice. Why not do it yourself by picking up your belongings and leave. Or replace the lock and make him leave? Why twice?
Never minds, I know people respond differently in different circumstances and have a tendency to normalize certain behaviors. I know people stay in abusive relationships for a number of reasons, and I know that when others call the police, the victims may be reluctant to tell what happened.
What is true is also true for Johnny Depp: why not report to the police?
Personally, l think they had an a very, very unhealthy relationship. And indeed, Amber Heard seems not very pleasant, and rather fake. Then again, JD starting taping conversations, not very pleasant either. I can imagine they spiraled out of control.
@@hamster4618 she was recording him long before he started recording her… I’m glad he did because we all get to see the real Amber…. They had a toxic relationship BUT I don’t believe it was because Johnny…. I think Johnny loved her so much and tried to help her and he couldn’t…
Her line of question is actually hurting her client
There she is, writing non stop like Jodi Arias. Pretending to write legal arguments like she has any leg to stand on. They are so similar it is horrifying to be perfectly honest.
Yep. Facts.
Lol, I would love a transcript of her note taking during this trial.
I thought the same thing!
I posted this the other day. So true. They both thought they were smarter than everyone else in the room. And their own evidence will be the downfall (Jodi’s photos, Amber’s recordings).
Finally some one mentioned that Jodi. First time I saw Amer I felt it's the same character with the same evil manipulative personality and the project of a killer to be 😥
Thank you to all the police and first responders for all the assistance they give us and for putting their lives on the line for us every day.
ACAB
@@prisontv3299 too bad nobody cares
Yes! These officers represent the law and they did a fine job! Well done, Officers!!!
She should have been charged for wasting the time and resources of these officers and 911 dispatch. She wanted the cops to come out so there would be record of police visits but she didn't think about how they would record it and testify to it being false/fake calls. I'm pretty sure that's illegal in my state, she'd have been arrested and charged for sure. You think it would be illegal in all states to prank call 911.
AMEN. 👍
Johnny's privacy is completely violated. Amber and her insanity brought the cops, psychologists, psychiatrists, medical doctors and now the whole world into his home. Sad.
I firmly believe this isn’t about money. Johnny needs to let his employers - and his fans - know that he tried to take the high road, but with Amber, it backfired.
I agree. I think it has nothing to do with money. I think it is all about Amber’s need to get the last word, thus her defamatory op ed in the paper. If she had just divorced him peacefully and let that be, she wouldn’t be being sued. This is all connected to Amber’s mental health issues. Keep in mind she tried to get Johnny to drop this suit many times, but he wanted to clear his name.
all the time and money he is spending on this... He is doing this for himself, because being branded something you are not something really terrible Is an awful awful thing to go through. I hope he can heal through this process.
I hope he gets his reputation back after this the world needs more Johnny Depp
I agree! He's a good person, she is not
@@16watch 💯
She literally needs prison time…….PERIOD!!!
Yesss!! She need go prison.. lol
Agree totally.
It is a civil matter. Liability, and money is on the line. No one will be arrested.
@@cezartb I know that sucks because what she has done is criminal.
I'm praying.
If there had been ANY injury, and the alleged perpetrator was no longer there, the cops have been out twice, the victim would be screaming down the roof for help. These cops ( I know, my daughter is one) see so much real and truly horrific stuff, asking them about her alleged injuries is ridiculous. They would know.
Absolutely would recognize red complexion from possible heightened blood pressure-due to an argument & crying eyes vs some kinds of drug use or injury. This makes me wonder if they just wrote this off as rich people silly problems as compared to the rest of the population. Cops are addressing real dangerous situations, in addition to this situation. Due to having to attend an argument between wealthy people possible delays occur in attending serious situations, such a waste of resources & taxpayer $. One question was why no photos to prove no damage. If the cops did this in calls to arguments if other situations w/o apparent property damage what a waste of good $$. The budgets for policing is constantly reported as being insignificant.
Totally agree. My sister is a PA state trooper that works on family violence cases. They see the real clues
@@kathypiazza4567 in our city, bodycams go on each and every time an officer exits their unit. The second set of cops did the right thing by going ahead and entering the apartment despite that guy trying to stop them at the door. Every case of alleged dv must be checked out.
God bless you and your family , i have some family members that are cops aswell , they said the same thing .
DV situations are also very dangerous for the officers because there is at least one person who is already violent and volatile. It also means going into a home where you don't know what kind of weapons etc may be present and rarely is it approached with a SWAT like response (there are exceptions of course). I had to make calls as a child witnessing DV and had to speak to the officers both on the phone and in person. The officers even stayed there while we packed to go to a family members house and escorted us there. Even in the 90s they took this very seriously.
Gee wiz, even the police say she had no bruises or marks!
I can never tell what side this lawyer is on. She always asks questions that end up supporting depps side lol
Amber probably lied to her legal counsel too
OMG I was just thinking this. I'm like is AH attorney trying to lose? LOL!
@@LillyJem I think it's unraveling and her attorney's are annoyed now. I read on TMZ that people are sympathizing with Elaine.
can this women be more needy? just believes the whole world revolves around her. what a waste of public resources.
Needy is an understatement.
I truly don’t understand the line of questioning of the defense attorney. I am not a lawyer but all the questions the defense attorney is asking seems to be incriminating her client 🤷♀️
Yeah they don't have a valid question to ask. Amber Heard's attorneys should go to Disneyland after this case.
@@otakumalayali223 Hahahah!!! Thanks. I needed to laugh out loud. 😂
The whole case appears to hinge on makeup. That is all the defense has.
Exactly.
She’s exactly like spoiled teenager like the butler testified. Always calling the police and wasting their time to come out there for nothing. She’s totally an attention hungry lunatic. Have to cause big drama and make all this noise.
she is definitely suite description of a Karen
Isn't wasting police time a crime?
AH did this as part of set up for DV against JD ..this was in my opinion a long time planning of doing ...
Has any witness helped amber so far? She has no case here... I hope justice is served and Johnny wins
How does this help the defense? It shows she is not upset....not in pain...just hanging out.
Sometimes I have to remind myself that they are representing amber and not Johnny, because they aren’t doing her any favours at all.
This is so pointless and such a waste of time for law enforcement.
Prison time is the only solution for such character. She's a whack job, how dare she waste public resources. 😤
She needs to also return to kindergarden and learn something
Why on earth would Amber want to do this to JD? This is just insane. She needs to be put in an institution
She don't want Johnny to leave her. She was begging for him to come back.Witch!
Amber‘s lawyer is allowed to say things like “you never saw anything on Amber’s face did you?”… and “you went to the residence to check on Amber because of the previous call right not because she called again right? “. And that’s not leading the witness. But if Deb’s lawyer was to say “why did you go to the residence“ they would object and say “objection, leading the witness“. And it would be sustained. He’s lucky there’s so much proof that she is a maniac because that is so unfair and ridiculous. I hope her attorney never gets another job after this.
I know!! Each time I wonder why Depp’s lawyers aren’t objecting. The only reason I can think of is for likability which Amber and her lawyers have completely lost from viewers.
I hope too she is very smart to lead the witness in favor of Amber's big liar
They are allowing them to dig their own graves. The jury will see how rude and misleading her lawyers are, especially in comparison to depps lawyers.
Plus, because they are getting use to the objections and getting their way, when the objections come from depps lawyers in cross examination, they will get stunned locked and start stuttering
@@khiaaugustine9193 honestly I think it's because they hang themselves. The more they get them to say no injury then better for Johnny
But i dont get it who called the cops if no one wanted to cooperate
A friend of Amber's who lives in NY. Apparently she was on the phone with Amber while she was arguing with Johnny Depp and called the police.
With each passing day I can’t help what wonder how AH is going to explain all of this once she is on the stand? No evidence of Johnny hurting her, but lots of evidence that she’s a fraud. Her case is beyond hopeless.
*can’t help but wonder.
Yes, cross examination will be interesting to say the least!
@@jenniy7557 yes, but will Amber's attorney tell the judge, their client is being badgered on the stand and the Judge will call out overruled.🤔
I would bet money that she is going to fake some teas up there. Guaranteed
Lots of makeup apparently...
@@rebeccalasiter5429 actually I was shocked that didn’t happen…. It’s like after the break the judge came back with different opinion…
I cannot find the right words to describe just how cringeworthy this lawyer is 🤔😳
'Cringeworthy' is sufficient.
I literally cannot see how Johnny cannot win this case. All I can see is her lies being exposed minute by minute - it’s rather embarrassing, I bet even her legal team know they’re on a sinking ship trying to defend her.
He can lose his defamation claim because this suit is specifically about the op-ed she wrote but it never mentioned him by name. They need to prove that it was clear enough that she was referring to him and that damage came as a direct result of that particular article and not before.
Thats how he can lose. This suit is not about who the actually abuser was.
The case isn't about whether or not he was the abuser or she was though. It's about loss of income due to Amber's Allegations and defamation. His side needs to prove loss of income due to the particular story she posted in the media that they feel was the catalyst to him losing his jobs etc. And even though it seems cut and dry it's a bit more technical in a legal sense because she didn't actually mention him directly in the article. I don't think it matters if he wins the case or not. I think the most important thing is he has redeemed his reputation in the public and future employment opportunities. He won't be seen as a brand risk.
He's gonna win but she won't face any consequences
While it is true that the point of suing AH is to prove that her accusations cost him his career and reputation, I think that ultimately JD just wants to clear his name and to prove to the public that he is not a wife beater/abuser- whether he wins or not. He even said it in his testimony. But I do hope and pray he wins bc he does not deserve all of this :(
They first have to prove that her statement of surviving DV is false. Since she obtained a TRO sitting this incident and 2 others, he has to prove that she lied. She also cited a timeline in that article, so you can easily Google the year and her or JDs name and it will bring up all the articles and pictures associated with the TRO. She didn't out right put his name because she didn't need to
1)it was widely publicized previously so people already know that's who she's talking about, possibly the only thing they know her for
2)She still included enough details for a reasonable person to be able to deduce who she was writing about.
AH has completely destroyed her own reputation and career.
God is beautiful isn’t it ?
Despite all the evidence supporting Johnny I still have the bad feeling in the back of my head of Johnny not winning the case or even if he does win, Amber's career will relatively remain in tact short term thanks to her gender.
She's a waste of space
@@kirby5550 I don’t think her career will be in tact, but I’m concerned about Johnny winning the case since defamation cases are among the hardest to prove
The honest truth is Johnny has already achieved what he set out to do.
In laying out what happened for all to see the court of public opinion is swayed well and truly back in his favour, hopefully he will start to get movies again.
So far very strong, however it isn’t 100% clear Johnny didn’t finally snap & hit her. During questioning the island manager AH’s Lawyer included in a question “AH Thew the can of mineral spirits, that hit JD’s face/bridge of his nose, to SLOW JD DOWN” from his charging at her, in self defence. Trying to indicate it wasn’t even a return volley in response to J’s throwing things at A or that AH once again angrily threw a heavy can at J. The lawyer didn’t try here to say A was throwing stuff around it in the general direction of JD. JD’s telling of this incident is that AH deliberately aimed & threw a can at JD’s face. I think the art supplies are a representation of an activity that distracts JD from a constant interaction or adoration of AH. I’d bet if he always & only painted portraits of AH she’d have thrown something else. Her mental illness makes her need to be the centre of every aspect of her life, including all with JD. She dislikes him jamming - if she is there she’s only watching not partaking & a primary participant, so she hates it. Poor JD & poor AH, I hope she continues with mental health experts to treat her & JD gets good grief, trauma & addiction Therapy & can make more Pirates movies & many more roles, as soon as this case is settled. She should be fired from future films until she is stable.
Ahh very good point! 👍🏼
Yes. He has WON public opinion. And somewhere , at some time, I hope he feels a sense of relief in being able to tell his side.
I believe so. Hes such a gr8 actor . I dont think their relationship is abnormal with HollyWEIRD peeps. Madonna Sean Penn for example.
@@lynne18ish Hollyweird is odd for a reason. Don’t believe me, research. 90% of “A” listers are practicing Satanists. Look for the one eye symbol and 5 pointed star. I am not kidding . You can find it all on the internet, especially photos. Please do not mistake me for a religious nut. I am not. I do believe in digging up hidden truths.
Police officers testimony was the best. It was interesting. They had audio and cameras.
I'm not sure what the defense is trying to prove here? They showed up after a call and found nothing and left. Okay, if anything this helps Johnny since it seems to show that after an argument, nobody was hurt and Amber didn't seem interested in doing anything about it or even seemed particularly upset.
My assessment too!
I believe it’s because she claims she was beat and had bruises at the time of this report ... perhaps they are trying to prove she is not creditable.
It corresponds with what the psychologist said, people with this personality disorder often threaten to phone the police if their partner wants to leave the house and often do so, they often even hurt themselves trying to stop their partner from leaving the house. As was evident from Ambers other recording, she simply refuses to let Johnny just leave when he said he has had enough of her incessant carrying on with Johnny for hours about nothing. Fact also here is that Amber told the police herself that nothing was wrong, that is the testimony to take away from this. Women like these often drive their nails into their partners trying to stop them to leave, forcing the partner to push them away with force, in such a case the domestic violence is from the woman and the man is acting in self defence, if the woman falls and hurts herself that is her problem as the man was acting in self defence to get away from the unlawfull attack on him. Men do however not call the police and tell of domestic violence when a woman drives their nails into their arms and scratches them seriously, men are often use to taking a beating, they'll just put a bandage on and carry on.
@@badmoonrising_007 but they're her lawyers
I believe they were trying to descredit the officer, as to invalidate their testimony under the excuse that they did not do all the necessary procedures to verify the incident
How sly of Amber's lawyer, using words for Johnny like ''perpetrator.'' rather than Mr Depp which it should be.
Yep,
That is her scummy job and her soul is poisoned.
Judge should’ve called that out and cut it off in the first instance. Judge has been pretty terrible at cutting off badgering repetitive questioning.
@@Jonathan_Doe_ d’s lawyer didn’t object, not the judge’s fault
@@georgiaeugenides6291 I kinda agree with you both. This was pre-recorded too like the others were though? That's prob how they got away with it.
@@silverdoeGirl oh i didn’t realize it was pre recorded. if that’s the case it’s already come into evidence and if d’s team had an issue with it they would’ve raised it during motions in limine prior to cross but they either didn’t, or they tried, and the judge said no
Omg, there wasn't any injuries. The house was fine.. The call from her friend in NY was the same thing.... That's what I hate about lawyers, they beat a dead horse.
3 cops have said all the same thing. No injuries, no damage to house.
Lincoln wrote Gettysburg address 3 paragraphs. Obama and company sculpted 2,000 pages on getting into our medical care!!! Gad. Point said.
Johnny deserves his life, career and reputation restored.
Justice for Johnny!
The world stands with you!
Objection-Asked and Answered a million times! This is a secondary responder. He does not have to conduct an investigation. He did not have to look at the caller because the first responders already conducted an investigation. Unless they see the place in disarray, there is no reason for this officer to so more than what he did.
After binge watching body language videos, the person answering the door displayed obvious reluctance to open the door. It’s true the dogs were there, but the entire floor is private and it should not be a problem for dogs to run about. No, the man at the door was nervous and suspicious and the police man immediately responded to that by asking to go inside. Upvote for the second responding officer.
@@suebruce493 cringe
@@suebruce493 true!
Her lawyer is trying to establish reasonable doubt ... in case you guys are wondering why she is asking million of the same questions
Well then she is doing a lousy job, every question she could have stablished a reasonable doubt has been debunked or backfired on them.
The only doubt being established is whether AH lawyer has any sanity. There’s no doubt as to her lack of ability.
No she isn’t. This isn’t a criminal case it’s civil so you don’t need to establish truth beyond a reasonable doubt. You have to show whether ‘ on the probabilities’ something occured. It’s a much lower standard than reasonable doubt.
And yet the answers of Officer are so consistent.
I'm getting really Confused! Is Amber's lawyer testifying on behalf of Johnny Depp? Because every time she asks a witness anything they keep denying that they saw anything in terms of domestic violence or any bruises lol well Amber's lawyer is sure doing a good job helping Johnny Depp
That's my question. 🤔
when will she be answering the questions ? I'm tired to see her lawyers ansking 100 times the same questions to force inconsistency.
That’s what I’m saying!!!!
She'll likely be put on the stand at the end as a hostile witness
Like a good finale of a show
He almost rolled his eyes out loud 🙄
haha ✌❤😎
I would love JD's lawyer to say "You can't handle the truth" when he is cross examining AH..Justice for Johnny!!!
This is a circus! Even her lawyers know she is not telling the truth , they don’t know what else to do! He drinks? Yes! He has his days o moments? Yes! He told her to end things in a civil way? Yes!!!!!!!
For all actors and famous people, DONT GET MARRIED JUST LIKA THAT!
her lawyers aren't paid for the truth. they are paid to win a case that's it
I believe she set him up from the beginning she never loved him and is a lesbian she used him to get fame and researched his likes dislikes taste in music the rare obscure jazz music etc she set Johnny up for him to fall for her and marry her "they had so much in common" and all her friends and family living off Johnny enjoying the high life living in his penthouses taking advantage ! Disgusting
My point exactly, her lawyers already knows she lied, they are just trying justify their pay by creating a circus.
Exactly what she is saying is vile
Never lie to your lawyer no matter what
That lawyer doesn’t seem like she has anything. She thinks that by asking the same question 20 times over that she will get a different result. If I was on that jury I would despise the sound of her voice at this point. 🤮
This looks like a situation where Amber wanted the police to "see" injuries and make a report without her saying or doing anything. It's as though she wanted to be able to say "I didn't ask for the report; the police saw the injury and made the report" and look forgiving and pious in the press. Why call the police twice and then still not want to make a statement? The guest in the house said Johnny had been gone for 2 hours so there was no additional argument between them, but there was a second call.
At this point, I wouldn't put it pass Amber to hit and scratch herself. I want to see the 911 log. Were these duplicate calls around the same time or there was a time gap between the calls.
The second call came from a friend in New York who was on the phone with her when the incident happened.
He didn’t go in, he didn’t investigate so how does his evidence prove anything either way.
What a waste of police time, real crimes are being committed while this woman is setting up her husband.
My thoughts. How can they tell either way?
They took over his home like vermin!!!! He had to leave to get peace!
so unfair that he had to do so
Maybe it's time for Amber's lawyers to stop pressing police officers to testify to something they didn't see, geez!
This lawyer is awful with the questions.
Disgusting! Lawyer ?
Attempting to accuse the officers of failings along with every other witness to nothing happening or injuries present to AH is becoming sad and tiresome for this case to drag along now. It favours JD seemingly and hopefully, but how can AH’s legal team continually from a professional standpoint be given this much rope to hang with?
Is everybody in a conspiracy against AH🙄
If she just stood up and said, “I lied”, she might save herself, I don’t know, something. She’s caught red handed lying.
@@MAWDIUS she is on trial for lying 😂
Nobody but Heard and her legal team are in a conspiracy against Johnny. Looks like the public and his own team, friends, family are very much looking at things from his perspective.
@@MAWDIUS She's on trial for writing lies in an Op Ed piece that caused Johnny Depp to lose movie roles. Defamation of character.
Maybe they doing so to count the dollars bills they will send her to pay for the work they done. You should know, as they are dragging for so long is maybe they release their incompetence and it’s looking bad for them so it’s better to continue to get more paychecks incase if they don’t get any other clients to represent.
I would really like to know what kind of record these lawyers of her have. They are incredibly aggressive and grating. Just straight up rude for no reason. Everyone I’ve spoken with has said these lawyers have made them think she is guilty even when they hadn’t prior to the trial.
We got you Johnny 🙏🏼
Ohh my god I'm getting by annoyed by the sound of Amber's karen lawyer👀🙄🧐
She's uncouth rude & a mumbler, she falls over her own words trying to sound professional and smart. It doesn't work
I was more annoyed with Rottenborn actually on day 8... (I went down the TH-cam loop and came across the trial at that day)
@@lea-anne9133 CORRECT😅
@@MrGtagangster Did you see it when Rottenborn objected to his own question yesterday 🤣🤣🤣
@@judepicton6252 I didn't, but it must've been the stupidest action ever!
The only thing I can say to her lawyers is, when you trying to defend a liar takes a lot to cover up a liar and as you covering that liar you’re actually exposing the truth I’m so sorry for her lawyers.
They chose to do it and they’re getting a big check to do it so I don’t feel sorry for the lawyers.
She'll turn on them the second this is all over. Guaranteed.
Defence lawyer: 22:09 is roughly 10:09?
Duh, It’s exactly 10:09!!
Does she actually think the 24hr time is an estimation?
🙈🤯😂😂😂😂😂
No wine on the floor in the hall at that time (something on the floor by the elevator?), no bottle broken or spilled on the floor in the apartment, uncooperative, confirms IO was in New York when they made the call to 911 contradicting both Amber and IOs claims
Io is probably presenting as female here.
@@suebruce493 who is io?
@@helloworld441 IO was a friend of Amber's who regularly stayed at their loft in L.A. IO identifies as a gender fluid individual. IO is the person who Amber was on a call to and told to call 911 on the occasion when the cops arrived to investigate a call reporting a domestic disturbance. IO claimed to be in L.A at the time of the call, claims Amber said J.D was hitting her and that they heard J.D throw Amber's phone, and claimed to have gone to the the apartment to comfort Amber, yet was in New York, as confirm by the conversation on the police body camera... In the argument with J.D on that occasion, J.D claims he told IO on the phone "You can have her" referring to Amber, as J.D suspected IO was attracted to Amber at the time
But isaac (Johnny's friend) said the same thing
I feel bad for all the policemen, doctors and nurses whose time has been waisted by Amber’s lawyers asking the same question in 20 different forms for hours 😝! I am sure they have more important things to do!
Pathetic
Sounds like a waste of everyone’s time. Their statements mean all the same thing that someone lied. And they should be charged themselves instead.
Like your going to call the cops and act like nothing happened when they get there. I lived for 16 years in an abusive relationship and when I finally got the nerve to call the police they helped me.
* 18:39 that was a VERY leading question!
This testimony seems more damaging to her than to him. She’s the one using spilled wine and broken picture frames as evidence to substantiate a domestic violence allegation. 🤷♀️
* False accusers should definitely receive the sentence the person they’re accusing would have been sentenced with if it were true. It’d make these gold digging, five minutes of fame seekers think twice at the very least!
why can’t the law be as just as we are am i right?
Every testimony so far seems to be weak on her part! It’s so frustrating I hope the jury are a level headed bunch an can see through bs.
She probably broke those pictures frames, then wants to blame Johnny. After all, she is use to throwing and breaking stuff.
@@joupton9908 yesss this is what I’m worried about. ugh with all this evidence, I still feel like the law will favor her more 😭I just wanna fast forward to the end of may
@@rebeccalasiter5429 and throwing hands too 🙌🏽 smh
She got really careful with her questions while suggesting a lot.
"Did you use your flashlight to see if person y has injuries? implying there was even an injury.
She does not ask anymore: "Did you see any injury?" which can be clearly denied.
Yeppp so true
Anyone who exposes themselves to Hollywood movies and mainstream news is subject to the exact same tactics regarding everything from false science to fictional history. These are evil tactics to promote lies.
wow good observation!! thx ✌
Good catch!
Police Officer - "Whos Amber?" 🤣🤣 Bet it was a gut punch to her ego that he didn't recognize her but knew exactly who Johnny was! 🤣🤣
What a waste of time and money for the police and the justice. All of this should never have happened.
I don't see the point in interrogating all these cops for so long,
Same questions 50 times,
Same answers 50 times.
Justice in the US can be very very patient when the accused are rich...
This guy is like why am I here and not working? Can we cross examine the lawyer?
Sigh I know Amber heard's lawyer is doing her job but it's just so pathetic she should settle I know he's suing her for a large sum but she's washed up in Hollywood she's still trying to push the JD hit her defense it's just pathetic 🙄
Why doesn't Johnny's team ask if they could tell if Amber could have used blush to attempt to create damage to her face. No difference than ask a bunch of questions about a damaged face nobody noticed.
Exactly
That would be speculation.
Ya probably, but when AH gets on the stand it would be great if they asked her even if it was to be stricken from the record. The Jury could still hear it and wonder😂
Because they don't need to reach like her team is doing, they have evidence on their side and there's not a single witness who even ever saw so much as a scratch on her. Stooping to their level would just have the opposite effect and make him look guilty, they should stick purely to the facts and not try manipulative tactics out of desperation like AH...
I just wish AHs friend would fess up and testify that she was making it all up! But then again they were all living off JD and probably did not want to jeopardize the rent free penthouses, trips, parties etc. They should all be liable!
Good God man , this is a 💩 show. Why is it so hard to believe this woman is a narcissist and didn't get enough attention that she thought she deserved, and proceeded to try and ruin a mans reputation? Her body language and facial expressions show it all . She won't get her Grammy for this performance, for sure. Also, I believe Johnny should make a movie out of this , because you can't make this stuff up 💯👍
I was thinking the same thing, JD should make a movie, he plays himself, hires all the people that were deposed. Hiring for AH would be hard.
I thought the same thing
Love it when he asks who's Amber
Using the Daily Mail in a court case is like using a lie detector test from Jerry Springer.
Or using only Wikipedia as scientific source in a university paper.
Ha ha I love it! 😜
😂😂😂
😆
People are not going to be naming their daughters “ Amber” or “ Karen” for many years to come
I think if this is every proven to be false the L.A.P.D should sue
Frivolous 911 calls are illegal and you can be charged for them
I love how the cops are chilling on the body Cam and give a Hood knock on the door LOL
How is it possible that JD is looking healthier and more handsome as each week goes by in this court?!😎
Why does her lawyers treat the witnesses like they are 9n trial. She is so disrespectful sheesh,birds of a feather I guess
Wow. Awesome to see these cops doing their job to the T. Even during calls like these it's so important to do the little things. Amber Heard lawyers are trash if they thought this video would do something
So funny/ridiculous how quickly at the end the lawyer goes on the defensive/gets disrespectful when she doesn’t get the answers she wants. 30:06
This attorney needs to....sit on it
Amber's attny just actually shows just how clean the penthouse was afterwards the claims of trashed out
"And Johnny is definitely not here"... "Definitely not a hoax". Dude who would say such a thing?
To think that she wasn't just abusive to Johnny but to most of their relations(friends, workers, neighbors, colleagues) shows you the kind of person that woman is. Imagine inviting a friend for dinner when such a spiteful person is around. Forgive me 4 putting it out there, half of the men I know would be on death row if they see their blood on the floor. Johnny is the most self controlled addict I've ever seen
It must have been really maddening for Depp to have to watch all these free loaders lounging around HIS Penthouse.
It's starting to feel like Amber Hurd defense team against the world.
How many times is she going to show the same video hoping for a different answer???? 🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
He should have stayed with Vanessa in France. He is much better with his family.
Let’s go Johnny 👏👏👏👏👏Let’s go Johnny 👏👏👏👏👏Let’s go Johnny 👏👏👏👏👏🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Remember the book ‘the boy cried wolf?’ We should rename it to ‘the girl cried wolf’ Amber - a true liar
Listening to this lawyer and her mind numbing questions is like nails on a chalkboard for me 😫
Her attorneys are just like her rude and snarky.
She was barking at a police officer who is just doing his job which turned out to be wasting his time when needed elsewhere because her client lied and was trying to set up her husband !
What does her lawyer think these videos are proving?
That she is a liar LOL!