AI is Evolving Faster Than You Think Pt. 2 (Art and Beyond)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 เม.ย. 2023
- A continued look at what’s going on in AI. This time we take a look at everything from AutoGPT and a fake AI Drake to AI art and copyright law.
Legal Eagle Interview: • The Law vs. Artificial...
ChrissaBug Channel: • A message to Artists c...
» ColdFusion Discord: / discord
» Twitter | @ColdFusion_TV
» Instagram | coldfusiontv
» Facebook | / coldfusioncollective - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
![Smartphones Are Rewiring Our Brains [New Research]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/GLD6chdFjA0/mqdefault.jpg)
![Smartphones Are Rewiring Our Brains [New Research]](/img/tr.png)
Absolutely spot on with the major record label analysis. They'll make it illegal until they can harness their own version .
Of course. Just like with drugs, so pharma can make the big $$. Companies have money to bribe politics, we don't.
Anthony Fantano made the same point.
These companies don't care about the artists, their statements about wanting regulation to protect artists from AI is total bs, and they'll drop artists the second it's profitable to do so.
Yep, once they own the rights to the artist's voice, the artist is done for.
Exactly like how they wanted TH-cam banned, until Google bought it and set up their monetization scheme
Doubt it. I think record labels are going to become obsolete in the future.
This man did a great thing by releasing the photo but not accepting the award. He proved the power of AI
@@weplaywaxif he hadn’t done it someone else may have and not told for years. Considering he’s done photography all his life he’s more worried of the impact it will have on the photography scene
@@weplaywax go away
@@weplaywax you probably play CD-Rs that you burned off torrent files
But they "can always tell?"
@@weplaywax He doesn't need exposure, he's been a known photographer for a long time.
He purposely did it to see how far he'd get, and when he won he didn't accept the award because it was WRONG to.
He brought awareness to a problem.
With your shitty example of doping, that person who admitted to doping brought awareness to it, was disqualified and the second place won.
Just like with doping in sports, someone had to get caught or someone had to confess for awareness to be raised.
The fuck else you want? You're making so many assumptions it's turning into a short novel.
"Let's assume people are going to cheat and what better way to expose cheaters than to cheat and let everyone know"
YES, you moron. People won using drugs in sports, and more stringent measures were developed even though they didn't admit it.
It took years and a ton of investigation and getting around well-paid people who were pressuring not to have it come out.
This guy won using AI and admitted it so people would be aware that more stringent measures were needed, now they'll be more careful!
Crazy right?
I can't believe you made 16 other logic leaps but the literal simplest answer eludes you.
Past me: I can hardly wait for AI to advance so that it can do technical things while we humans can focus on art and entertainment.
Now me: this is not what I expected.
Be careful what you wish for.
Everybody was thinking it will replace shop assistants, waiters and construction workers. It's working on replacing artists and programmers😂
@@Matt-bp5vy
We haven't seen anything yet. This train has been rolling since the 60s and now, it has hit a slope and will continue to pick up speed.
My biggest hope is that humans will put the breaks on before a decision we cannot take back is made but I doubt we have any way to stop it now. Too many people have access and too many bad actors out there. Even good actors can still make bad choices without a way to reverse it.
It's irony at it's finest we all thought AI was supposed to replace manual jobs not creative jobs. But suprise suprise, it's the creative process that's more advanced than the manual jobs.
Why you may ask? It's simple, money! Literally that's it, software is much simpler to make and easier to use. Meanwhile, no one wants to replace manual jobs with robot cause they're expensive. Seriously why pay for 1mil for a robot when an immigrant will do for so much less.
MANY PEOPLE LOVE WORK IN INDUSTRY
HOW D4RE U WANT A.I / MACHINE REPLACE THEM
As an artist I'm having a hard time with how I feel about it. On the one hand, it replaces my ability to just be an illustrator. On the other hand, it makes me feel like I'm an art director, and it could help me do projects that I, in the past, would have needed a TEAM of people to work on. So, do I miss the old ways? Or do I prefer being a fake art director? I feel like I could more easily make a video game than ever, as an example. I can only make so many assets on my own, but AI can help me figure out colors, and even character designs, so I can just illustrate them into my game.
Only use AI for help you can use AI for reference material and you can get many inspirations and after that you can make your own art with the help of AI
(Sorry for my bad English)
By stealing the art of others to make art. Sure
@@piusdoe8984 do you happen to know the definition of "inspiring / inspired from"?
@@piusdoe8984stealing is using the exact same art and saying you made it. Using the same art style to make something new is not stealing, it is creating art in a category. This is the same as music
@@xapu8775 Anyone who says that in this context has never attempted piece of art, guaranteed.
There’s one aspect of our life that A.I. art encompasses and fits rather brilliantly - it’s the speed of the content that is pumped out and instantly forgotten. This whole “speed” thing is the bane of human artists: you spend hours (often days, months, maybe years sometimes) crafting your piece, then when it’s done you put it out… aaaand it’s rendered irrelevant after several minutes, buried under the speedy stream of content. You get your “5 minutes of fame” (or maybe not even that) and the thing you put so much effort and dedication into is literally gone, cast into oblivion, buried. So, throughout recent years, the only way to “stay afloat” for artists was to create a constant “online presence”, to pump out as much content as possible to “beat the stream” and stay relevant. With A.I. art this whole thing becomes irrelevant since one can technically create an infinite stream of A.I. art, thus boosting one’s “online presence” to infinity - “a new piece every second!”
So, what I’m driving at is that a sort of paradigm shift is required in terms of how we access art, how we appreciate it, and how we value it. No idea how it’ll turn out, though.
Now you only need 5 seconds of fame.
That's bad for the artist and good for the consumer, and the consumer matters more in the relationship, artist's are mad but realistically what they say doesn't really matter
Already happening, I'm seeing legitimate artists who used to do a piece a week release AI crap everyday without announcing it. Koreans are especially bad imo, they flat out lie about it. Getting ahead of others with engagement by abusing generators is going to be the norm, nearly everyone will do it; then they will be back right where they started fighting the algo.
Its tragic human nature. We end up making things worse for everyone permanently for a bit of short term gain.
@@chinogambino9375 Yup, true, the "algo wars" are going to get crazier... I just wonder where the new point of “equilibrium” will settle, because in a way the current situation is without precedent: in all other historical turning points (the invention of photography, the advent of Photoshop) you had an upper limit of supply, so to say. I.e. a photographer can take only a limited X amount of pictures, a Photoshop artist can edit only a limited amount of graphics and so on. With A.I. the supply problem is seemingly nonexistent: ask an AutoGPT to “make me an Instagram art influencer” and it’ll hook itself up to some A.I. art API and… bada-bing, bada-boom, you have a technically infinite stream of imagery pumped out every second. There are of course some costs which might act as limiting factors, yet those costs are minuscule just as they are now and, as far as I can guess, are only going to decrease with time. And there we are, cripes!
we should consume less content for real. i have done an extensive research on artists who are really drawing. i only follow them on my socials and youtube, i now mostly follow hand drawn stuff either digital or on paper. i have become very selective and consume a lot less content and guess what, i now get a lot of time to do other works and my headaches are gone.
Three years from now, we won’t even recognize this world anymore…
Nah..
Its fine... automation is here
We already don't, and it's only going to get worse. I'd give the western world a decade before it starts to get better.
@@PapaDalbecYou mean worse
As I wrote this I'm using chatgpt to basically do my assignment for me, it's damn good to
I REALLY appreciate these AI videos! Having someone update me on all of the things AI happening is worth while. It can be hard to glean updates on my own.
❣️❣️❣️
Good points!
To summarize.. this video brings up arguments against AI, then totally counters all of them and agrees with AI. He speaks with a soft voice and put in calm music to manipulate the listeners into agreeing with his bias.
Use AI
Glean is awkward there.
There is a reason why we learn math even though the calculator was invented
Still draw realistic drawings when the camera was invented
Still play physical instruments when digital instruments were invented
We don't do it because it's the most efficient way, the best way, or the fastest way
We do it to grow
Nice! 💜
It's so ironic that the one thing we always said AI would never be able to do (creativity, art), is one of the first things it's actually good at
That was my first reaction too.
That tells you we can' t predict the internet
if it were good at it, it wouldn't need human training data. of course it appears better when you tell it to copy human art that you already know is good...
@@rumfordc It's only the beginning relax lad, you will be amazed
@@rumfordc that is so stupid, that's like saying if Eugene Delacroix was good he wouldn't of needed training by Pierre-Narcisse.
3 ColdFusion videos on AI in 3 months, we’re screwed
Made with ai 😂
@@comosaycomosah😆 You could definitely say that again!
Commented on.....by AI
And all 3 were written by AI...
@@ChatGPT1111 AI would never format ellipsis that way.
As a designer, I'm inspired, follow trends (even if I think I'm being original), and mould into something new for others to enjoy. None of my work has ever been copyrighted because I'm a Landscape Architect. I just keep improving. Now with Ai all of Architecture as an industry is in fear. The reality is that packages of work (normally 5-10 stages of packages) would take three people, two mid-level and one senior, two weeks (10 days) often one long day due to alterations/mistakes etc. With Ai with decent libraries, one person 2 days if not quicker. So thousands of surplus designers, graphics renderers, rendering programmes etc. Gone. So Keynes was right after all about needing to find time for leisure, UBI? it's just who owns the asset? And at what price. Should be elected transparent governments, not DAVOS-type corporations. It's all down to RENT.
Well said. So if we rent we have no anchor to call home, work, etc. If we rent to own, anything physical, could we be part of the experiment of progress while putting a dent into consumerism and planned obsolescence? It's an idea.
In art the same happened . The creation for a catchy sales pitch with image from scratch takes weeks if not months but now they only use chunks of existing images in photoshop in order to make their new image. Originality has gone from this branch for years.
I have seen a lot of architectural work using AI at first I was in Awe but as I learned more about architecture I kind of get where these ideas come from they weren't original like I thought then I noticed they all kind of looked the same now I can distinguish AI generated images. But the images that were kind of creative were done by well established architects so I believe we still need to knowledge and artistic sense to create good images I think it just skips the 3d modeling and rendering part. it's my first year in design school and I am trying to optimistic as I can🥲
Lol either UBI.. or they will try to get rid of some excess folks through war, banking / economic crisis, virus pandemics etc so the masses will be reduced and subdued before they can rio..
Hey wait! 🤣
@@ahlamamr4659 Don't worry; there are still too many people who want professional things done by people, as well as many who don't trust things done this way. My Dad retired from architecture in 2014 or so and still hadn't touched a computer (he drafted by hand and hired people to transfer it over). I'd say you're safe for a long time.
My son is an artist. He wants to make a living with art and now I'm even more sceptical of that future. That established artist crying on camera broke my heart.
Rest assured that if we had cameras back in 19th century, a lot of blacksmiths or weavers would cry as well. I don't see any people crying for them nowadays. :)
@@MankindDiary That’s because everyone forgets that those jobs still exist. A lot of people probably felt sympathy for them in the Industrial Revolution, but everyone from that time is probably dead by now.
I've read Yohei's prompts that he used to create BabyAGI and he most definitely has at the least some coding experience. The vocabulary that he used in his prompts were coding terms.
yeah you can even go further. just like it gets most languages you can give your commands in pseudocode
Yea It was too good to be true
the thing is knowing coding terms and coding is very different, and most coding terms are real life things and logic anyways. but i do agree that building that without coding experience is questionable at best
@@SYBIOTE I agree. I was in no way trying to imply that he's some expert like a senior dev for Google or something like that, lol. But, I very much doubt that he has zero coding experience as the story implies, and yes coding at it's core is logic. But, I have never heard anybody speak in a manner that's so robotically similiar to logic boolean ops or use if, else, elif statements in conversation with another person (he didn't quite go this far but it didn't seem to be out of his ability to do so)
@@Bimmer_MD yeah i mean with some basic training in 10 days anyone can write basic logic , I agree with u too
I've just discovered your channel two weeks ago, and I'm blown away by the quality of your videos. This is high-standard journalism.
Besides referring to a singular person as "They", his videos are great!
@@CricketsAreUsHe prolly just says that because he doesn’t know how many people are involved in the project. It’s usually more than one person.
"ima attention hoe" 😅
@@kovy689 I could see that
Welcome to the Coldfusion Family...
On a sidenote, the channel was named something else in it's initially days...
I learned my skill as a paste up artist 40 years ago when most stuff was done by hand - retouching etc. 12 years after I left college, I got my first computer and have learned all the iterations of photoshop and other graphics software. I learned to combine my hand drawn illustrations with the digital effects and efficiency of graphics software. We have to adapt - it is one of our strengths as humans. I am experimenting with AI image generation and then combining it with my own illustrations and digital skills in photoshop. I believe we need to see AI as a tool that we direct our concepts with, build on and innovate with. It is not going away any time soon.
However, I do feel that how images are sourced by AI should somehow be legislated for so that living artists are not left without a way to live because people are making knock offs of their work.
It is a dichotomous and difficult dilemma- this I will agree on.
"I am experimenting with AI image generation and then combining it with my own illustrations-"
While I agree with this I think the other side of that is people not molding it into something new and just using A.I as a crutch and not a tool.
I love how the images on Ai videos constantly morph around the same thing continuously, eventually becoming completely different from the first image, but not too far off, feels almost like how in a dream, a place is mostly not consistent, a room, in some dreams that i remember is always shifting it's layout, like in this dream where i and a friend where in a house, hiding from a sound that was not pleasant coming from the outside, felt like something dangerous, although the lighting kept consistent, dark with low yellow lights, the house initially had corridors, but each time i looked around it was changing, until it was a simple four walls house, with furniture and stuff inside, but different from what it initially looked like, and with me and my friend still hiding in expectation on what was the seemingly dangerous thing outside, some Ai videos feel like that when i see them, and that is really cool, makes me think that there are some similarities on how we imagine things and places, and how Ai process and recreates a base image, if you get where i'm trying to say.
So i really enjoyed your video sequence in the end of this video.
I know that dream; the feeling of it. My children and I were sharing dreams and we all realized we'd had dreams with the same invitation to something foreboding.
The sound, and the "seemingly dangerous ", primal thing, rolling in increasingly powerful pulses . It feels as though there are elemental morphings co-occurring in our psyches and AI . We're here. (unless I'm a chatbot) And we're alive in times so "seemingly dangerous", and exhilarating.
I’ve worked in Silicon Valley for decades as a programmer. The reactions are the same I witnessed from newspapers, music labels, and others. People get angry when they’re faced with becoming redundant from new technology. Even my programming job is going to be extremely diluted within the next 5-7 years. It’s just the nature of human curiosity. Change is always occurring, we’re just living in a time where the pace of change accelerates so quickly we get to witness multiple cycles in a single lifetime, making it far more impactful / noticeable.
5-7 years? I think you’re being extremely conservative there 😂
i am ok with the AI helping or replacing, i admire the technology, but making it by stealing copyrighted content is outrageous, only brainless dickheads could think it's ok.
@@ukwired08 The Capabilities catch up early. But the Industry need to accept and adapt the change, which will take a lot of time in some spaces. Especially with the zombie-companies, which will never adapt and fall in a few years. Therefore 5 years is quite realistic.
@Lord Vader aw q++😊'
@Lord Vader Probably true. Star Trek was more on point than we thought. This is why so many in the tech space talk about Universal Basic Income. Most of us don't even like UBI, but we just know AI and robotics are about to make the majority of us redundant. Capitalism is so effective it's about to remove human labor from the equation, lol.
Continue putting out these AI updates. Excellent job including impactful philosophical questions society is forced to answer and weaving them into current events news stories.
Love your AI videos. You are doing a much better job than the broader media.
I see it as a double edge sword, on the one hand allowing great creativity, while on the other destroying some artist's incomes and careers. It is an immensely complex issue.
It's typing in words. That's not "great creativity" and you're not even in complete control of the outcome.
@@piusdoe8984 It is about choices. The computer comes back to you with some options. You make decisions based on that. This is not a lot different from the famous artist who has a studio, like Andy Warhol had the Factory. The assistants come up with various designs/compositions, colors, styles, etc. then the artist makes choices and directs the assistants what to do. As a HS fine art phtography teacher, I "played" the students like a piano to get them to produce what I saw in my mind their negatives could produce. I would submit the best of the best to the Scholastic Art Competion. My students won more prizes in New York than any other photography teacher. At one time, they said the artist had to make the product with his hands. Then, they said art is a product of the mind. Now it can be a product of the artist's mind and the computer. If the final product has no human input, then it is not art. There has to be some human input, even if that is just making choices.
@@russmartin4189 so what you’re saying is that Andy Warhol was the creative one, and the assistant wasn’t? Because why, he was the assistant? It’s the dummest example ever. All idiots thinking they are creating things using AI, when in reality they’re they’re just ordering something. It’s like walking into a restaurant telling, the waiter what you want and then saying” look what I cooked. “ zero creativity if you ask me. Look if you all want auto generate art that’s fine, but don’t call it creative.
@@mobaumeister2732 Not saying you don't have a point, but I have a feeling that real art will be made with Ai. In the past, they argued photography wasn't art because it was made by a machine. Then they argued that you could not make real art on a computer. Then they argued that using Photoshop was not real photography. The key is how much the artist puts into it and how creative the final pieces are. Maybe a line has been crossed with Ai. I am intrigued though. I wonder what I could do with it? I have an MFA degree in fine art photography and taught art in both colleges and high schools my entire life. I think the jury is still out. Let's wait and see.
@@piusdoe8984 Not "yet".
Dude your content is unreal. Thank you so much for your research and development 🙏🏼
He is a Elon fanboy though .. sometime he makes me abit sick haha
@@australianoutback Then dont watch him and bother others
Bro why you moving to Calgary???
@@yugen3968 He's an AI
@@LuisSierra42 Honestly the voice over doesn't sound too far off from a I generated.
Awesome video. The pace of technological change is mind blowing.
I am 55 years old and my first computer (circa 1981) didn’t even have a hard drive - you had to load the OS from 5.25” floppies (which took about ten minutes) and the entire system was 64k. Games were mostly text based. Graphics was like “Pong”. Nowadays we carry more powerful computers everywhere we go.
The next few decades will be even more mind blowing until Skynet wipes us out.
5.25 floppies were so fast compare to tape recorder. When I bouth my first one I was looking at it as a miracle device. I bet someone can say, you have not used punched cards to complaint for tape recorder.
You're an optimist, few decades, lol, we'll be lucky if we get one decade. Those first personal computers were fun, today's devices are abusing us.
@@alexk6745 OMG I totally forgot about the stupid tape recorder - that's how you had to load the OS on the "Trash 80"!
Didn't actually have a "microcomputer" with a disk drive until I got a generic IBM compatible and then a crapple II. Still got the first version of Windows somewhere come to think of it - before they changed their colour scheme to blue and white (it was grey and boring). We had to learn how to use a punch card computer in our computer science class at high school - what a piece of crap glorified calculator that was and even in the 1980s it was a relic. They didn't have a computer science teacher so one of the maths teachers who'd gone to university in the 50s or something took the class.
Zx Spectrum 48k....tape loading error.....ahahahaha! Those mean tape recorders! Ahaahhahah
The “Trash-80” LOL. My friends brother had one.
I recall the first fully automatic loom at the beginning of the industrial age. How the German weavers tried to weave against it and starved at the loom. The German guild forbade such machines at that time, so that everyone had work and a living. In addition, the guild preserved human creativity and diversity.
Tbh I dont think Artists have anything to fear. I think art made by humans will always ultimately be sought out more than AI generated art.
But what happens if the 100 images you see are as good as man-made
But among them there are 80 that are made by A.I?
Maybe for the world of comics, A.I. is not a big threat but if they live only from drawing. Yes, that's the problem.
People nowadays like free things.
And not all artist have same skill
That's the way it is.
Unfortunately it will eventually be almost impossible to tell them apart
His podcast is underrated. Super cool to listen to you two talk normally about this subject and then see this incredible video about it. def subbed to both channels
How do I find it?
Yea what’s the podcast dummy
Plot twist this channel is A.I.
Hire an AI lawyer to defend your AI art.
The AI judge will then give the verdict
AI Private investigator finds dirt on it to get a deal
you then go to AI generated jail because your AI generated art's AI was trained by other AI generated art
@@thesauce1682 The jail design was generated by MidJourney and then a bunch of construction robots made it real.
@@martiddy generate an AI avatar to serve your sentence
This reminds me again that they have the potential to create deep fakes and are able to destroy one's life completely in seconds. This is so scary.
Yo bro your audio is very well mixed this time. a lot better than a few videos ago! Less pops and crispy mouth noises and the max decible level is perfect, at least for my earbuds xD.
I love how frequent you're giving us these AI updates. Thank you!
not quickly enough. i’m scared that reality is not even real anymore
Wow that bot ordering the pizza was incredible :o when OpenAI released Dale2, I already knew we were too far ahead but it's hard to wrap my head around every realm of AI. It's scary
Thanks for your effort into these videos. I never miss your videos
I wish I'd known about this channel before: wow, it's not just that your production is super sophisticated; it's the ideas you express.
The pace is such that things must change in the time it takes Dagogo to produce these cutting edge videos. Always a quality production.
im not an artist but my 2 cents are that artists will fill a similar niche to skilled carpenters or blacksmiths, they wont go extinct but a lot may. nobody needs a fancy handmade custom wooden chair to sit on but there will always be people out there who will be willing to pay very good money for it. my guess is that most art people see in 5+ years will be AI generated but companies and individuals will still seek out human artists for certain projects.
ah yes back to the patron system.
This is bad for economy, money will stay in the hands of very few who gets to produce products for the masses.
@@ooogabooga5111 but when the products cost 1/1000th what it would have cost otherwise, there is basically no chance for economics not kick in here. Eventually the cheaper option will prevail
@@ooogabooga5111 I mean, the tradesmen today are making good money.
@norabu789 I fully agree with everything you have said, and I am a visual artist. Sculptors, engraver, designers and crafters will remain as you described when people need physical works commissioned. But graphic artists and painters will be gone or very rare like skilled taylors.
All art is subjective, and the entire market is controlled by a few prestigious galleries around the world in New York, London, Japan, France etc and the wealthy acquire these pieces as assets.
The disruption will start when these artists begin using A.I. to create pieces, and the ones who suffer the most will be the unknown, so called "struggling" artists about 99% of artists and designers. Established 1% artists will go extinct, then graphic artists and the rest will just become irrelevant or teachers until that goes extinct as well.
The wild west of Art has begun, A.I. will dominate, and cheap original art will be available for the masses through prints/digital works.
Everything done by humans before 2023 will be called "classical art". There is no stopping this.
Whether Actual Artist "steal" or "borrow" makes no difference...they are still artists and have to create it with there own hands, mind and skill...its not just writing the right words to get a computer to do all hard stuff. Never stop creating ...! we need it as humans..we need real music with emotion aswell..it is so important to humans..things that make us feel.
Something that is stolen or borrowed isn't created... it is copied. Just because a human "does" it does not make it art
A year later, this evolution has not slowed down at all. Now not only are the images even more photorealistic, but Sora provides photorealistic videos. Pandora's box opens more every day. By the time you are reading this, I'm sure even more insane progress has happened. This is what the curve of exponential growth feels like.
Bro, I just made a university presentation on the exact topic with some of the same examples today and now you drop that Video! Feeling deeply connected, love you and your Videos. Keep it up.
"The worst that it will ever be" is so exciting and haunting at the same time
Haunting?
Thank you for this. Your videos continue to inspire and provide a landing for discussion.
6:09 that "good bye" was bone chilling man...
The moment AI can draw hands we are done for. But thankfully the human artists, whose works the AIs train on can't draw hands either.
Midjourney v5? It can draw hand perfectly 90% of the time.
The hands has always been a compute power thing.. it was just a matter of time.
We're already seeing ways on how it can be solved. Midjourney V5 is already pretty good with hands but even StableDiffusion now has ControlNet where you can easily fix hands
hands isn't really an issue anymore
AI can already draw hands
Already sorted.
I'm an unpublished fantasy-writer. And it's just a matter of time before AI can create entire works of fiction on it's own. Even less time before aspiring writers will use an AI to help them write books. There's a lot of people with ideas for stories, but far from everyone has the skill or time to write it. I used to imagine creating my world and the stories I want to tell would take up my entire life. But with AI, maybe it can be done in a matter of months? It's scary to think about, and I'm not sure if I think it's a good thing or a bad thing. It's a bit like winning the lottery instead of working.
Do it. The whole point is to make your life better, so go out there, take it by the horns, and live that life you've always dreamed of.
We use AI to do the things we want.
Cute.
AI also uses AI to do the things it dreams up, probably.
Your ideas are not needed.
But they are used, like every other idea you say or write down, as fuel for the AI database.
And you get nothing for it.
This is not just a tool.
What is also cute is this: the entire comment section seems to think of this AI turning point as 'just another tech revolution'.
As if turning points have something business-as-usual about it. As if you can expect them to behave according to natural laws of economics. And you can berate others who have an issue with any development out there.
What if we had "get with the times or get left behind" about nukes. That would have been an entirely different vibe than the more serious one we had, isn't it? How does that vibe translate to the way we treat the development.
Ah you know I'm sure everything will be fine without me doing anything. So I don't have to bothered.... except with trying to get an edge,.. of course.
This entire comment section is one big meme.
when that happens, we will reach levels of genericity that we never thought possible.
Writer here! Keep writing and put your all into it.
I like wandering around on Red Dead Redemption 2 and taking photos with the in game camera, then uploading them to the Rockstar Social Club, then saving them to my PC and using them as desktop wallpapers. It’s nice to see pictures I’ve taken myself in the world, and I remember each one I took. They really do mean something to me, I spend quite a while moving my character, composing my shots, calling in a wagon to stand on to get more height… it can be quite a long process, but I love it, and I love the end results, and I love how I feel when I see my picture on the desktop 😊
Forty-odd years ago a poet 'wrote' several poems by creating a number of lines of text and randomly choosing the order. He actually won an award that was later revoked because the judges ruled that the computer was the actual author. NOTE: this wasn't AI, just a random number generator and the poet wrote every line.
As an artist myself, I started learning traditional arts like everyone, but I also started to learn photoshop and how to make manipulate digital images to create new works of art. I think people who are crying over the introduction of AI art didn't experience the transition into consumer level digital art. They are used to being able to use Photoshop, Procreate, and the 1000 other digital painting platforms out there, so for them this new thing that can repeat their work so quickly is scary. Just like when painters said the camera was scary, photographers didn't like photoshop, it was scary. Thing is everything is scary until you learn to use it. AI art can create crazy stuff now, it's not all good, but a good artist can make it amazing once they stop being scared. I love playing with AI art, I can create images of things that I don't know where to start with them. Use that and make my own work, it gives me the spark or the glimpse into my imagination that age is making harder to see. Haha
But, this is different. This is not a single faceted disruptor. This will be like a 100 mile high Tsunami engulfing everything. Already, it makes me an artist and a computer programmer, for examples. I need zero training. Lawyers, teachers, researchers, writers, receptionists, Drs, etc, will all experience disruption. Some severe others complete.
I agree with above; i don't think the same logic applies.
Ultimately we'll adjust similarly (we're humans, adjusting to a new reality is what we do), but the consequences will be much more expansive.. especially if you take into consideration the speed with which ai is being developed. We may settle a debate that is already outlived it's relevancy by the time you get anywhere near a consensus of some kind.
This will keep us busy for some time before we have a good understanding of the totality of the implications
You don't own Ai generated arts so you might practice your Photoshop or traditional arts more
@Miz people didn't initially own their photos like today, and I remember there being a debate about if digitally altered photos could be owned by more than one person-the photographer and then the person who used that photo to manipulate it into something else with Photoshop. Eventually, the rules around AI art will evolve and grow. Currently in the US straight from the AI art isn't able to be copyrighted, yet.
I do see it happening eventually because I can feed stable diffusion my own artwork and train it to make pictures in my own style, well close to it. Technically I created that art because the original source material is mine that it learned from, and the prompts that I feed it are my original ideas, what it spits out is a rough to good copy of something that I could have done by hand. I see a point where it will be like Photoshop. As for AI taking over jobs, it's been doing that for ten years at least. Robots for decades have been used to automate everything, they run on AI. It just pushes people to adapt and specialize in new things. I welcome AI, if it can make my work even a 10th of a percent easier then all the better. Especially for things like background cityscapes, haha drives me crazy trying to get 4 points of perspective correct for a dozen plus buildings.
Don't be afraid of it. Instead, think of how it can make you better and help you improve or to ease the burden of making your faster.
Ai art is pretty garbage when it comes to creating a good art. Stealing data does not represent nor in a same level as a smart living being who make art. If you let it change you only make you weak.
Only humanity can create something that will replace them, thoroughly.
We will get to post-scarcity at this pace.
I vote for Artist getting compensated for any works that ave been used in Data sets. Artsits should always get paid for their talents
Correct... because the creators of the AI are essentially telling the AI to steal images from the actual creators. That's like saying it's okay for me to take your car paint it green and call it my own. The world shouldn't work like that. It is unethical and immoral.
@vintage high five because stealing and ruining someone's livelyhood is bad?
@@EnigmaScienceit’s not stealing though, there are many digital art pieces that use aspects of other photos to create new art. if there is a AI art image with 1000 pixels and each pixel is from a DIFFERENT copyrighted artwork and it’s all used to make a completely brand new piece of art. Do you really think that the original 1000 artists should be compensated for that ?
@vintage high five I am an Artist..A musical one.
@@paco1022 Well in music..using 5 or more notes from a melody is copyright infringement. Well its meant to be anyway. If you wanna talk Pixels..its a similar thing I guess..IM not saying shut it down or anything..just make it fair on Artists that have dedicated their lives to their craft.. What do you do for a living?
When I create a painting, it is a process which is very meditative and I do it because I love to create with all my heart.
Kudos to you, Dagogo! 🙌 You've been ahead of the curve since the AI Revolution took off just six months ago. Thanks for helping us keep up with the whirlwind developments! 🚀
The thing is though that Dagogo cant even begin to keep up with the current pace of AI news. I still ❤his videos. 🙃
You are one of the best documentary creators. I love your work.
finally, someone i agree with
DAMN dude!! The quality of this video brings tears to my eyes. You put so much effort into this. 10/10 bro
Your vids are so well produced!
Honestly the rate that AI is evolving at is something I would’ve never ever imagined a few years ago.
Midjourney was only making Abstract vague art in its V1 model in Feb 2022. V5 version of Midjourney can make Photorealistic Images like the Pope with Maximum Drip. That's March April of 2023.
@@silverhawkscape2677 it's going too fast, please just stop for 10 minutes.
@@DrumToTheBassWoop
I figured out how we do this: Make sentient AIs persons with rights asap.
Nothing will stop the big corporations pursuing general AI as fast as the possibility of AIs being granted minimum pay and an 8 hour workday :-)
The threat of misalignment? Meh.
The threat of having to treat an intelligent being decently? Aauurgh! 😱😱😱 Socialism!
Plus it would be the right thing to do.
No intelligent being should be a slave.
Edit: Spelling
@@DrumToTheBassWoop ok we have waited for 4 hours now so resume the AI nuclear train ride!
Thing with tools like photoshop is, they have a learning curve which filters out those who'd rather have someone else do it. As such, to maintain your relevance as an artist, you're obliged to go that extra step to maintain your relevance. Now what AI is doing is basically taking instructions which a client would have given an artist, and giving them results faster than an artist would read the prompt and reply to the client. Are artists still going to get work, yes. Will it be worth it to put in the years of practice needed to become a good artist? I don't think so. Commercial art such as posters, concept renders and even book covers will be easier to output with AI, and the need to hire people who are now paid to do that will be hard to justify as a business expense. I'm an illustrator and animator, and It took me years to get the skills I have now. I'm not optimistic about a future as a career artist anymore, especially after seeing that even comics can be generated using prompts. This is not about learning to use the tools to improve your own work, it's about realizing that what I've invested to become has now been relegated to a disposable middle-man position. Guess it's time to go back to school and consider a career as a plumber or welder...before some other smart guy decides to automate those too, just for kicks.
Well said! Such a sad and terrible future awaits us and most are either unaware, ignorant or happy about this unnecessary “progress”.
Totally agree with you. Those in favour of this Ai tech are definitely not artists. They are people who wish they were artists, but don’t possess the talent or patience to learn the craft necessary to create anything. What Ai is fast becoming is a replacement of talented human artists. Not a tool for artists at all. Us artists want to create the work, not have an Ai do it for us. Prompting an Ai does NOT make one an artist.
Well, that's the problem with being a specialist, sometimes a revolutionary new tech comes along that makes you obsolete, sucks but it happens, plenty of other specialists before you have suffered the same fate.
Hey, AI is not perfect nor sentient. It would seems like they could create high quality art with little input, but it still needs a lot of work to fix mistakes and to adjust it to the vision that either you or your client would like. It still needs an artistic eye to identify those mistakes and being able to collaborate with the AI to create a great piece of art.
I do agree regarding commercial art being rendered obsolete by the existence of AI art, but there will still be people who would be able to pay for good art, more so for clients who care about quality of the output rather than just some low quality AI weapon.
On top of that, a fundamental shift regarding how our society works needed to be changed given recent tech advancements and the effects that this has brought ton too of the aftermath of the pandemic.
Capitalism is obsolete, it needed to be changed.
I’m an animator as well and many years after my degree I was starting to think I couldn’t finish my side projects before I die since it’s so time intensive.
Windsor McKay wasted months redrawing backgrounds before people thought maybe cels were a good idea.
You might feel dismayed that these tools are like having an extremely competent assistant, but you’re undervaluing how this liberates you from the grind and let’s you be more creative despite overwhelming workloads
Wow this is a very well researched and informative piece. Well done mate 👏
Great video ColdFusion and I like your videos so much :]
Thanks for another great episode. I can’t get enough given the fast pace of development. Always appreciate your ability to summarize and lay out the key points. Keep going on AI topics please!!
I'm a wide ranging person in that I like creativity, technology, philosophy, etc. but I do feel for visual artists in particular and those who have especially put so much time/energy into that one craft. The rise of creative AI does concern me but with a wide range of interests, my heart is not stuck in one specific place so perhaps it's easier for me to deal with and adapt. Of course, though, if AI creativity replaces human creativity entirely then that would be depressing. I think the human touch will remain popular to a large degree but how popular is impossible to say at this stage.
AI cant actually paint or anything yet. I think once a robot can actually paint then artists will go extinct
About 3 years ago i gradually stopped practicing 3D Modeling because after some couple of "generative" world building and asset assembly news i've got a very bad feeling about this.
Looks like my gut feeling was right this time.
For now it's 2D artists, but i've already have been seeing for years 3D work pieces made by algoritms / sw / ai / generators.
It's just a matter of time.
Happy to have moved on into a different field.
Creativity and creation are two different things though. I don't think it's ever going to be possible to completely replicate a human's ability to imagine. What I find ironic is that if it became easy to create art, the world would actually have more artists, because everyone would have the expert tools to show their creativity.
Imagine how awful doctors feel in 5-10years before they start putting them into first line diagnosis into care facilities. 10 years of study suddenly replaced by a way better machine.
I mean chess engines haven't made people stop liking human chess, I'm already seeing tons of ai image generation accounts and i usually ignore them because it didn't take skill to make
Brilliant. As a stock photographer I will be going back over my collection and tinkering with them to produce more interesting compositions.
As a photographer and digital artist, I definitely see the concerns, however for those truly dedicated to the art, I think it will just become another tool. I have tried using it and maybe it can and is replacing some works/ jobs. The thought of a more difficult time getting jobs is scary, however the way I am going to see this is as a time saver. Maybe before where one would have to draw every tree, rock, and element of an image, the time it took would limit what was possible. Now you can generate elements it would be really time consuming to find or create by hand. The time saved greatly expands the scale and scope of pieces that are possible. Maybe some would say thats less genuine but to me art is about expression. As an artist rather than use this to generate the whole image (which I found lackluster anyways,) it to me really shines as a tool to create really specific things that I can then choose how to use in a larger piece.
When I start a piece I just let the ideas flow and my unique thoughts/ mood, memories, and life experience all factor into the kind of art I do. Even if one day we get truly sentient AI that can imagine things way crazier than I could ever do, it will still not diminish the love that I have for being able to sit and imagine something and make the ideas in my head come to life. It could not come close to my style or stealing my identity because the works I do come from memories of photos of places that really exist and hold meanings and emotions, and the very process of assembling it in a way that's meaningful to me is something I cannot see being replaced. Is the AI trained in my life? The touch of humans on their work is something I do not see ever being fully replaced. I have never felt more free to imagine vast scenes of the imagination and see dreams realized, and this has been an exciting tool that I hope to adapt alongside and integrate.
I really do hope that's the right path, maybe it isn't. Even if one day it does get so easy to generate art that no one buys anything anymore, I would rather be on the side that tried to adapt to a new tool than sit back and reject a new technology and be forgotten. I have already within my circle noticed that the friends who have used the new AI's as tools have felt not that it was stealing but that it was giving a new voice to people. Maybe for the people that don't want more artists to compete with thats a bad thing, but I want to see what happens in the world when art becomes easier. I feel like this is going to be like what happened with computers for the art industry. I am sure that right now there are already artists using this to make some absolutely mind blowing shit that probably could not have existed before. Maybe the AI is making parts of an image, but the way it assembled, imagined, and even prompted all are inputs from humans.
As a musician I have to say, people who are making art just for the sake of it becoming a career will be disappointed anyway. Most of the people I know who are making music or creating art would continue to do so regardless if they're making money or not. They didn't make any considerable money before generative AI as well...
Also I believe people connect to art because of the artists journey and the hard work they put into it. That's the whole reason social media is huge for bands and artists in general because the audience want to be part of the journey. I truly believe people will be looking out for artists they can connect to more than ever.
Keep doing what you love!
I really enjoyed your analysis on historical precedent regarding technology and how artists adapted to it.
I think this will end up being good for artists. First people will realise how good these AI's are at producing incredibly authentic art and then they will start to question if the art being made is real or not. If an artist can prove that they produced it manually then it will earn them heaps of respect.
It already happens to a degree with photography. Sometimes people can accuse a photo of being fake or photoshopped and if you can prove it wasn't then you'll earn more respect.
come back to this comment in 2033 then. you can check it in 2029 if you want
I hope so, but I doubt so…
Thank you for yet another thought-provoking video!
Link to the pictures of Bezos, gates etc as poor? They were brilliant!
I would say that they were indeed piece of art, and very powerful.
In less than a decade, AI will change the way we live.
... or die.
nah. It would be like plastics effected the world, but less so and more niche.
A decade 😂. You've got about 3 months.
No. In less than 2 years. By 2025.
This year.
So growing up, from kindergarten, I was praised for my drawings. as a small lad in the 90s, I grew up thinking I had some sort of magical talent that made me special. And it turns out that's because most people never get encouraged to be creative even though it's literally a skill that will be extremely vital whether you are a scientist, an engineer, or an artist. In school, kids would literally pay me to draw them stuff... In class, everyone wanted to hear my short stories... My creativity was nurtured by other people's enthusiasm for my work. My creativity was also nurtured by the dozens of hundreds of games and movies that are now either classics or cultural icons. As the 2000s rolled on, and as the people around me got older I noticed this praise also came with a side of jealousy. The number of amazing games and movies and shows fell further and further apart. And even later yet, by the early to mid-2010s I noticed various forms of resentment or hostility from friends or coworkers who were in non-creative fields. Comments like "only kids with rich parents or idiots go to art school". Friends or coworkers unknowingly belittle my profession as little more than a slab of paint to make things presentable rather than being a crucial part of the team. Games and movies became ever-repeating copies of each other with few gems far and few in between. Deep down, It seemed like the general consensus was that if you were creative, you were probably either too stupid or too lazy to become an engineer, lawyer, or doctor. And this mentality was reflected in the types of media we were fed through popular culture. dust it off to corporate greed or whatever else you want, people do not value creativity anywhere near as much as they did in the 90s. Just look at the gaming industry, it used to be led by imaginative entrepreneurs, but now it's led by suits who think of the artists as nothing but slaves. And they struggle to understand why indie games get more praise than their shitty unimaginatively directed products.
Now drum roll please because if you thought that was depressing, wait till you hear about the wonders of AI "art". If the "versificator" from Orwell's 1984 wasn't a hint of what's to come, then I don't know what is. Artists are so lowly valued in society that we call the people who generate images using diffusion models "artists". The fact that a bunch of jumbled-up stolen art doesn't meet standards for being eligible for copyright MAKES NEWS LOL! Everyone, even artists, EVEN I tried to tell myself that these are just more tools in our arsenal. It will not replace artists just aid them!... But it's hard to have that mindset once it generates a bunch of stuff with literal watermarks and signatures on it. Let's just put aside the fact that this AI stuff is vomiting art it ate from its guts for a second, I'm all for progress and not being the grumpy old man who can't cope with new technology. But how we get to new technologies matters as much as the tech itself. Stealing literal work is unethical, period. Now we're all second-hand thieves and somehow we as artists are supposed to be cool with it or become obsolete.
So I thought and thought about all this. What's the point of learning any more new tools? in a few months, you'll be able to type in a prompt and get fully textured 3D models... Literal videos, animations, you name it. Why bother? I thought maybe we as a society don't deserve art. To put it harshly. fuck it, why should I make anything beautiful for you ungrateful idiots? Drown in your ever-recycled vomit of defiled art corpses for all I care. Then it hit me, or maybe it's my unrelenting optimism (another creative trait, and one that seems to be lacking in society lately)... This whole AI "art" thing is a literal Ouroboros. As the last few imaginative minds in the world see no future for themselves in the creative fields, there will be fewer and fewer artists. We will slowly venture into a new dark age where technology is the oppressor. The existing artwork in the library of these generative AI will recycle through itself billions of times, no new styles will develop... as the nonimaginative minds are too scared of change anyway.. people will forget what it's like to look at a piece of art and see a piece of god in it. Until we deserve it again... until we see it again.. until we've had enough and we enter a new renaissance... and so the cycle will continue. at least until whoever is running this simulation gets bored of the repetition, or the AGI takes over, or we nuke ourselves like a bunch of angry idiotic monkeys.d
Was this written by A.I.?
Cool but newer models trained by independent companies are AIs generated using only art the company holds copyright to and they’re only a little worse than our most powerful models. Even if you shut down all the ones with copyright in the database AND delete all the art that were generated with them so that we can’t be “second hand thieves”, generative AI will take off none the less. All you’ve done is set the technology back by a week by deleting months of hard work by people.
Then, images generated using legally acquired imagery will be plugged right back into the machine since the company holds the rights to those images, then you’ll just be in the same place right now, except short one excuse to cling to
looks like ai copy pasta.
@@kls1836 There would be no way to tell.. anything and everything on the internet can be fake. so whats the point in me trying to disprove it.
@@ExHyperion sure, and I agree that the problem is not the technology itself. It could have been traine don "legit" data and come to the same quality in a few years. But the point I'm trying to make is the devaluation of humanity.
14:20 tbh the reason I do anything creative is to see the final product. I suppose the journey can be seen as valuable, especially if there are different variations that lead to the final product, but still... Drawing is just so damn difficult for me personally, and jumping over that hurdle is quite hard in of itself... and also quite time consuming.
"what is art?" Is a question that has been getting asked for as long as the word has existed and nearly every time the answer is "what ever the artist says is art."
Love the discussion at the end! AI arts are giving birth to new definition of arts.
But the interview with the female digital artist broke my heart. I have many fav digital artists I followed.
Most of them are people with anxiety disorder, autistic and other mental issues which made it hard for them to work 'normal' jobs.
Drawing gives them chance to pay for living expenses in the safe place of their home.
Thinking that some of them may gave up on drawing just because it cant pay for their living is heartbreaking
common artist also have disorder not only IA artists
@@tekila6375 good to know 👍🏼
The AI revolution is legitimately the greatest cultural impact mankind has experienced since the wheel.
Doubt that
I'd agree uts the internet but this may be second
@@fidelio9301 Give it 2 years. If we're even still here then.
Maybe we can then just cut your connection to the power grid. As that is less important.
@@ryanmilota2395 That’s my point, the world will probably fall apart long before this the way it’s going.
I will alway commission Artist, the hardwork they put in to make the work pop out is always amazing.
This video is mind-blowing! It's incredible to see how rapidly artificial intelligence is evolving and the potential implications of this advancement. From self-driving cars to medical diagnosis, AI has the power to transform so many different industries and aspects of our lives. It's both exciting and a little scary to think about what the future might hold as AI continues to progress at such an incredible pace. Thanks for sharing this thought-provoking and informative video! - sincerely chatgpt 😉
Maybe I'm late and it's already a thing but please make more videos like this from time to time. This is a fascinating series and your channel has become my go-to source for updates in the AI world recently. Of course I love your other type of videos as well being a relatively old subscriber. Keep up the good work, cheers Cold Fusion!
Thank you a very insightful summary of the unfolding developments with generative AI and the arts, copyright, ethical considerations and such a powerful tool that is only in its infancy. As an arts educator it has left me with a lot to think on concerning learning, teaching, evaluating and qualifying.
Just goes to show that when I double majored in Studio Art and Computer Science 25 years ago and after graduation was not so subtly pushed towards coding by my parents and away from drawing and painting, as sad as it may seem, it was the right choice. AI can do some rudimentary code now, but the artwork generated does make illustrators disposable.
bro, we coders next XD
@@Eldalion99999already are. AI can write 100% perfect code most of the time but you will need to understand it.
Really great video. Well explained everything going on with A.I
Loving the videos and look forward to your research into the topic.
I was an artist in the past. Now ever adapting to new mediums.
I like how someone mentioned that everyone will act as art directors, giving the prompt to AI. Then choosing which look and feel will be the final choice.
This channel is SO underrated. Great stuff!
look I love this channel too, but in no world is 4.47m subscribers "underrated." actual delusion
Now this is what quality documentary should be.... 👌👌👌✨
The thing I found most amazing about this video is that the first photo, as the video opens, won a Sony photography award. Even if it had been a real photo, what was extraordinary about it? What were the judging criteria? Was the competition judged by an A.I. ?
The best part about AI is that you can easily create award winning art of your own while simultaneously making those awards meaningless.
The best part for who? Not the artist...
@@NJDDSNS everyone who is not an artist of course! The good for the many outweigh the wants of the few
The art scene worked hard for many decades to make their own awards meaningless, through postmodern relativism/nihilism, identity politics/woke activism etc
@@NJDDSNS for society as a whole, the professional art scene is a scam run by criminals.
@@supermaster2012 Especially when art is auctioned for immense money just for tax evasion
As an artist this really hurts my feelings, the drawing style used by each artist is unique and developed not in days, or months, but years of development, and AI just takes the result which really frustrating.
Same for every trade
Great video.
My thouth about how copyright could work if goal is to protect human part of creation:
Digital art created fully or partially by AI can be copyrighted by author.
Any AI art generated from prompt that specifically use copyrighted work can be partially or fully owned by author of original art (depending on how much of original was preserved).
Copyright of AI art can be aquired only if input prompt is included.
If I was still drawing, I'd appreciate to be able to handle curvature derivates, color gradients and apply colors according to the vector fields I have in my mind when thinking about the form my head wants the depiction to have. I can't even change/mix the colors while applying it continuously at the paper. I am rather envious an AI can do those things (badly, but much better than humanly possible) on the fly.
Creativity is always mixing together learned things and adding some randomness, even if those particular combinations of experiences/knowledge have never been combined before. Artists don't do anything different, it is just the way the conscious mind works... and even purely logical thought processes follow a certain pattern, accessing thoughts rather randomly, whatever comes to mind during a certain mood or state of mind. It would take too long to go into details, so I'll just cut it here. People should not complain about an AI or someone else doing the same job better, even if they put a lot of effort into acquiring those skills. The most important thing is whether society as a whole wants to invest the power required to run AI for such rather trivial tasks or not and how to distribute generated goods/wealth to society, when not everyone needs to work to produce them.
Good point about the cost of energy.
Very enjoyable as always. AI generated images vs human created art reminds me of the quartz vs mechanical movements crisis a while back. In the end, these two (vastly different) technologies found a way to share the market by catering to different consumer preferences i.e. accuracy & a tool vs user involvement & tangible craftsmanship. But admittedly it’s very early days, so we’ll just have to wait and see. Keep up the good work!
Excellent analysis as usual! 😃
The seemingly unstoppable advancement of AI is both very scary and very exciting.
I think A.I art should be based on a joint effort, where A.I is exclusively trained using art that has been submitted by artists voluntarily as well as art pieces that are no longer copyrighted.
This would slow down the development but also be a more ethical approach as it would leave artists who do not want to partake to be able to keep creating their unique art without too much risk if being usurped.
In an episode of Futurama maybe from the 1st or 2nd season. The opening credits for a show the characters were watching listed a bunch of robots who worked on the show and only ONE HUMAN WAS LISTED! Matt groening predicts the future not only with the Simpson but Futurama as well.
_excuse me while I pick up the pieces of my brain_ ....
AI can't copy art that hasn't been made yet. Keep making, y'all.
and artist are just salty they can't do sht
That opinion fails to consider everything.
The problem isn't copying, it's replacing.
Why would I ever higher a brand artist? Why would I submit art to competitions after hundreds of hours of hard work, if AI will win? Why would anyone higher me, when the AI will give them anything they want? Why be an artist?
That's the problem.
@@thesauce1682
Compared to AI, neither will you. I am an engineer. I will be safe for 10 years at the most. At that point, AI will always create more efficient, more accurate, and more effective solutions to problems.
The last field AI will replace will be research. But that will be the bow of a sinking ship.
@@thesauce1682 Ahh to be an absolute moron and not know it, so liberating !
@@thesauce1682 This. Artists are the new luddites of the Industrial Revolution. They see the writing on the wall and want someone, if not the government, to wave their magic wand in hopes that generative AI will only be restricted to the hands of the few (preferably in the artists hands themselves, so they keep making a paycheck).
13:14 Why am I laughing at her tears so much? 😂😂
ChatGPT makes Google look like your grandfathers encyclopedia collection.
Like you said, it's as bad now as it will ever be. It's current shortfalls will be overcome, and there is nothing that can be done to stop that. There will be no "prompt experts" in the future. It will become truly creative and it will work for free. My only hope is that society can make peace with that. It's marvelous technology, but there are uncertain times ahead unlike anything our species has dealt with before. It's a sudden jump in capability, and sudden changes are always difficult to adapt to.
Especially with autogpt. But also this means identity theft, cyberterrorism etc just got a massive upgrade.
To distort mankinds perception of reality it may invalidate our democratic and justice systems entirely, or bring people to the aftermath of the tower of babel. Where speaking the same language is irrelevant with no common understanding.
People keep saying this but it's not really true...
Ai has been in development for decades and decades now, the main thing that changed was data and hardware power, and also it being made public.
But the technology isn't actually new.
As data and hardware improves they might become better but it's not really a guarantee no one actually knows what the roof is yet.
@@jag764i forgot who said it, but yeah its nothing new it just has a better interface.
All it will do is create a new market. Ai content. Kind of like how all you could see was jazz at clubs, then disco, then house. You still have jazz clubs and jazz festivals, but its not the only option.
That said, ai will eventually just release so much trash it will become like white noise. Its novel now but wait until theres just so much of it.
@@goemon4 I think it's different as you can prompt it to generate according to the hottest trend. Whatever is in favor or makes sales will be mass produced via AI and you won't be able to tell which one is original cause they'll all look pretty good.
I love your channel! Always well spoken and captivating! Thank you ColdFusion!!
Brilliant video and information - Well done - you are well informed with the data that you used in this video and others. Keep up your good work - you are getting noticed on TH-cam. Shalom and God bless.
Fascinating... and scary at the same time. First thing I thought of was Skynet, from Terminator.
It is evolving - from hand-made painting to camera to digital photos to Photoshop to AI. Everything is built on something earlier model and in reality we have to embrace the future.
indeed, everyone will have to learn or be left behind. this is just evolution.
i do feel that UBI will become really important and our economy can certainly afford it but politicians wont allow it
This is like when classic music instruments were threatened by digital synthetic music. Both have their uses, and synthetic still doesn't have the rich sound quality of a instrument. Artists who are flexible will realize how to use AI to enhance their art, or learn to work with it if they want.
No, it isn't like that at all. New instruments merely allow human artists to make new sounds. AI makes and arranges sounds on its own. The only human element is the client telling it what kind of music they want. The client typically isn't even a musician. So sure, the human customers and CEOs will be fine. It's everyone else who used to actually make the stuff AI soon will who are spooked.
Most art/artists are lazy, I remember seeing art shows of a banana on a wall with duct tape, a pair of glasses on a stand, etc. Art has grown stagnant and I think in the long run, people will need to work hard or quit - same as the rest of the world.
Still find it funny, coal miners losing their jobs? Their work and livihood gone overnight? Pfft, learn to code, scrubs!
Artists 'worried' they'll lose their jobs? Wow, everyone suddenly cares.
@@Bjorick tell everyone your a splinter in the thumb of humanity w/o saying it...
@@Bjorick “”””most”””” the examples you listed are literally just for tax breaks. Spend five minutes online looking at artists and you will see how hard working and passionate they are
@@ncch7568 hard work and passion do not success make.
From what I recall. Copyright protection is for the original creation ONLY. It does not protect the derivative. The derivative gets ITS OWN separate copyright PROTECTION.
I think a possible starting point is developing a reliable way to communicate how any creative work was produced. So if a human comes up with the prompts that the A.I. uses, and then the human works with the A.I. and other editing tools to refine the art to match their creative vision...in that case, I would give more credit to the artist, and possibly accept a copyright. The amount, and level, of creative 'work' done by the human is an important part of the origin story of the work. It doesn't make it more inherently valuable, but it will be more valuable to some, so they should be able to know.