I'm pretty sure they don't fire the Ship engines during a full-stack static-fire test. The don't even do full-stack static-fire tests. They only static-fire the booster, when the ship is not stacked on top. The only "test" they do with a full-stack, is a wet-dress rehearsal, and they only time they fire the ship while it is still attached to the booster, is during a flight's hot-staging event.
Static fire of a full stack does NOT include Starship's 6 engines, unless you want a mega-explosion of the vehicles on the pad and likely destruction of Tower A and fuel farm GSE. Don't you have a tech reviewer?
there never was going to be another launch in 2024
The launces are always delayed.
I'm pretty sure they don't fire the Ship engines during a full-stack static-fire test. The don't even do full-stack static-fire tests. They only static-fire the booster, when the ship is not stacked on top. The only "test" they do with a full-stack, is a wet-dress rehearsal, and they only time they fire the ship while it is still attached to the booster, is during a flight's hot-staging event.
That would be a pretty spectacular evolution indeed.
it may help for better launch
25 launches in 2025?
And at least one of these to the Moon I hope.
So the FAA approved the launch and Space X is now unable to blame anyone for delays.. interesting😂
Who trusts the FAA to be apolitical 😮
Static fire of a full stack does NOT include Starship's 6 engines, unless you want a mega-explosion of the vehicles on the pad and likely destruction of Tower A and fuel farm GSE. Don't you have a tech reviewer?