Nice, catch those cheaters! I really hope I get access to the cheating claim review program at some point. Idk what you need to do to qualify for that though.
@Ice_B3ar I think the program should only be changed in ways that help to catch more cheaters. Not in ways that would just make it better for content. The program should first and foremost be about accurately catching cheaters, any content that gets made as a result is just a nice byproduct of the program but not the main goal.
You misspelled that Manaus bridge location, writing it correctly to google maps brings 5K location immediately.
unfortunate, I still think there's a fair argument it isn't cheated though
Cheaters only get coal in their stocking this Christmas
Same examples as Zigzag - I assume Geogussr has a test set of cases for moderators to start with?
if I record a part 2 i would have to delay the upload for a few months it seems like
8:11 are you italian?
yes but my first language is English
Nice, catch those cheaters! I really hope I get access to the cheating claim review program at some point. Idk what you need to do to qualify for that though.
I've heard someone say 1100 rating
Christmas came early
theses cheater videos would we so much more entertaining if not every reviewer got the same cases...
that's unfortunate, had no idea that's how it works
@@_lucca_ not your fault, the system makes sense but apparently has some downsides
@Ice_B3ar I think the program should only be changed in ways that help to catch more cheaters. Not in ways that would just make it better for content. The program should first and foremost be about accurately catching cheaters, any content that gets made as a result is just a nice byproduct of the program but not the main goal.
They need more than one opinion I think