While in High School (1968) I had a '62 Impala SS 409 4spd with dual 4bl carbs and factory HP heads. It' passed everything on the road except the gas stations! I could actually watch my gas needle slowly go down as i drove it, (but High Tech Ethyl gas back then was only .43c gallon). It came factory without PS or PB and had a very stiff clutch. But it was sure fun to cruise around town in. ;-)
Everybody had promo films. They were commercials so yes, biased. Everybody knows that. You were selling a product so you highlighted the bonuses and downplayed the negatives. It's no different today with everything from cellphones to cars. Thanks for the video!
As one commentator, indeed one “Ima quigmire,” put it, “Everybody knows that.” But did you know you can save fifteen percent or more on car insurance by switching to GEICO?
*When I was a kid...we had TWO cars that I thought were 'the coolest ever'...a '64 'Country Squire' wagon...and my mother had a '64 Impala 'SS' w/a 'FOUR-O-NINE' in it! Burgundy w/white 'tuck & roll' inside and an automatic 'T' handle on the floor...I still think that was a 'sweet looking car'...and the Ford wagon was white with red vinyl inside w/an electric window you could control from the dash...that one was a '390' and I liked them both!* ( *We had a '58 Olds 'Holiday Sedan'...and that car was a 'beauty' to drive cross-country from Dearborn to Las Vegas in...we had a cat named 'Tabber J' and one time he jumped from the front to the back and peed on me while I was sleeping on the back-seat...he just couldn't 'hold-it' for the next stop!* ) *The one thing I miss most from 'then' is VENT-WINDOWS and the 'pull for outside-air' control on the dash...no motor, just air rushing into the intakes and coming thru all the vents and the heater outlet as you drove...and I miss the comfortable seats from that era too...why can't they make 'comfy- seats' any more?* *New cars are far better than the '60's ever were...but why are seats so damn uncomfortable?*
409 was the ultimate sleeper car, because it looked like something your granny drove to and from church. But put your granny in a race with a Mustang, it she'll smoke that young "whipper snapper"!
My dad bought his new 63 Impala SS on a year-end close-out on Nov 22nd 1963, the day JFK was assassinated. I was 2 years old and don't remember it but it was a story that was passed down to me. I guess everyone was shocked and crying on the drive home with the new Impala. 14 years later the old man gave me the Impala, what a bad ass ride! I said 'gave it to me', what I meant was 'I had to work my ass off (at his liquidation business) to earn it'. Neither of my older sisters wanted it, dumb broads.
Wow as being born on day President Kennedy won the election I can remember the story so thanks November 7th 1960 hey your sisters were raised to respect their man as that was their only Job correct
In the 1960's, GM had 52% of the car market, the other 20 brands split up the other 48%... until the Govt declared them a monopoly and told them to sell less... or get broken up into pieces... of course, selling less can become a hard thing to stop...
Back in those days I always had Chevys. I got a Galaxie loaner once with a 390, stick shift. It was a dog but I thought it must have been worn out or something. After seeing this I can see why the Galaxie felt like a dog compared to the Chevies I was used to driving. The 61 thru 64 model years were a Chevy Golden Age.
29:15 - I'm sure what's seen in this promo is exaggerated, but those Corvairs COULD actually take a lot of punishment for an air-cooled, rear-engined compact! My father had a Monza version back in the day, and it went through a lot of hell, and didn't take much to keep it maintained... "Screw you, Ralph Nader!"
Next car I buy is gonna be 1962 - 65 Chevy Nova (restored) 194 6cyl 3 spd manual trans. No EGR valve / O2 sensor /catylitic converter /ECM / electronic add on crap. The car will have much better value after 10 yrs use than ANYTHING sold new today - guaranteed!
In the 1960's, GM had 52% of the car market, the other 20 brands split up the other 48%... until the Govt declared them a monopoly and told them to sell less... or get broken up into pieces... of course, selling less can become a hard thing to stop...
first car 62 impala ,283 pg paid $100 for it 2nd car a 62 biscayne 409 3 speed ,paid $250 it was called bisquick wish i still had it ,both never gave me any issues and drove them like a race car everywhere dependability hell yea
In the 1960's, GM had 52% of the car market, the other 20 brands split up the other 48%... until the Govt declared them a monopoly and told them to sell less... or get broken up into pieces... of course, selling less can become a hard thing to stop...
So did everyone else... In the 1960's, GM had 52% of the car market, the other 20 brands split up the other 48%... until the Govt declared them a monopoly and told them to sell less... or get broken up into pieces... of course, selling less can become a hard thing to stop...
I was chuckling when the 327 Impala was squaring off against the Ford and Mopar; neither of the latter two had their engines described. Note it took the 300 HP 327 to do the deed, to boot.
My first car was a 65 chevy impala SS It wasn’t to fast because it only had a 283 under the hood with a power glide transmission but it sure was nice looking and it only cost me 300 dollars in 1972
ANNNND Smoking a NON filtered cigarette at the same time!!! Haaaa , great times when I was a kid.God let me go back......I miss all my ww2 uncles!gtjoey1314
Gee whiz, I gonna get me a Chevy and move to Scottsdale! Oh no, too late, this is 58 years ago ... and that Corvair turned out to be "Unsafe at Any Speed".
*I think that 'engine-turned' rub-strip on the '64 was the 'ultimate in style' and the 'Impala' logo-in a-circle was really 'something...and something about the styling and the 'look' of Chevys & Fords from that era reallygets me, probably because I was growing-up and actually had an attention-span longer than 5-minutes!*( *I don't want those times back...but that era WAS 'coolest ever' for a kid, at least to me it was* )
An Incredible amount of sales and testing effort went into these commercials... All of the earlier vehicles were so much easier to work on and keep running properly, than the modern vehicles... It is too bad that the IDIOT Ralph (the mouth) Nader LIED about the supposed 'handling problems' of the Chevy Corvairs. What was unsafe at any speed, was the movement of his pen and his mouth...
In the 1960's, GM had 52% of the car market, the other 20 brands split up the other 48%... until the Govt declared them a monopoly and told them to sell less... or get broken up into pieces... of course, selling less can become a hard thing to stop....
The race against the airplanes: they started with a Cessna 310, but in the next scene it was racing a Beechcraft Baron-? What? Is Donald Trump handling this race?
What this tells me is that it was MUCH easier to cheat in various ways back then........My sister drove a 1959 Falcon for her first car and it started in bitter cold when any other car in the neighborhood would not! And this was the late 70s....no rust either.
I think our future is to use the technics & chassis architecture + some modern components in Fuel injection, but all over more the cheaper "Low Tec" like used in the US 60s/70s cars + the V8 engine! I think this is the right way for future, because those cars are a lot more economic, could be self repaired, and in manufacturing it use more manpower. less full automaitic manufacturing. because only with a way with a mix of both earas are really good for future! And i think straight 6 + V8 engines are the best motors in all situations! mixed with some motor management, and fuel injection you got the best engines/Motors for cars! They could be used and hold alife for so long time, that this is the right way about really environment protection! Because a tiny 4 cyl engine with a lot of supercharged boost istn´t a good way for a lifetime of a motor! And eclectric cars, just forgett that old, so heaviely environment destruction technic.. No, Eclectric cars aren´t future! That ist a very bad joke to call E-Cars "future" ore somesting else like that ;) (It´s only a governmental arenda what will take us the only good way about cars. that´s no joke. that´s only a bad agenda! the loosers under that agenda are we, the cars, the tchnic, engineering and almost the environment... E-Cars are so bad for all. I´m a professional specialist for Cars and engines. I know about what I´m talking about. And i think so...
The designs were so good for Cameros, Mustangs, T-Birds, and Challengers that they had to be essentially brought back for a new generation that happily bought them.
Yo tengo todavia un Impala 1961y funciona como el primer dia y muchas de las cosas dichas en este video son ciertas como la suspencion que es capaz de mantenr un vaso de agua sobre el tablero y no derramar una gota
Oh wow Joey chitwood remember Chevy gave him whatever he wanted to make good shows at every fair across America. And sell their cars as the safest cars without any seatbelts/ and solid steel dashboards with no padding .2019 not .
I had a 63 Biscayne 2 door sedan with 3 on the tree that had a 6 but I pulled it and dropped a 275HP 327 in out of a 67 . Used to shut down 440 Chryslers with it....hahaha .
This film was intended for the sales staff, not the customers. So how would a sales person even use what was presented? "I saw a race in the desert where an Impala beat a Galaxie even though it first had to take a u-turn!". Sure buddy...
@@supergranddad6364 I wasn't alive then, but my dad was. They didn't worry about healthcare. They had a town doctor. And they all knew no one lived forever. Food prices? Yea everyone since the beginning of time worried about that. Because the price of food is what you pay at the market, or the labor you put into it at home.
In 1962, The standard V-8 for the full sized Chevrolet was the 283 170 to 195 HP engine, not the 250 HP 327. Plymouth had the 318 230 HP and Ford the 289 170 to 195 HP. I would imagine a 327 would out accelerate the other engines. It also appeared some cars had automatic transmission and the Chevy II had manual. Always a plus compared to the 2 speed Powerglide. All of these comparisons are rigged to a certain degree. Those cars were not made to haul 1100 lbs of cement. In my opinion, all of those cars had pluses and minuses depending on what the buyer wants. My dad had a 1962 Fury with a 383 4 barrel which would have shut down the Chevy with the 327. They are comparing apples to oranges here but this was entertaining..
@@eugeneschulte4950 I just checked it out. You are correct. The first one I remember was 1965. I had a 65 Comet Cyclone that was a 289. I also remember the 260 prior to that. Even though I'm old enough to remember cars from the 50's and 60's, I don't remember 289's prior to late 64 or 65. You have my apology sir. I'll stick to Mopar's. I had many more of those.
The Plymouth valiants were some of the ugliest cars back then, I remembered them from way back then, most the of the ones I saw were usually police cars,
I guess what i can't believe is that in the first clip is that shitty looking Valiant was right on that chevy 2's heals! It's Valiant for me if this was rigged! Hell watch, the Valiant even missed a gear on takeoff.
Wanda: And no seat belts also no daytime headlights. (Oh, I remember as a kid, on coming drivers would turn on and off their headlights and wave their arms out the car to say we were driving with our headlights on during the day).
The problem with Fords, even then, is there was very little variety among their product line. Everything was "cookie cutter", just a bigger version of the same car. Whereas Chevrolets had style and variety in their lineup--every car looked different and there was something for every taste. Not true today--where every SUV looks the same and the only choices you get are mini, little, medium, large, or extra large of the same SUV
46:58 hey the impala was the first one to go. No wonder it was the first car to beat that challenge. They should have had the other 2 on 2 other streets and then we can really see who won
Iove chevy nothing is history and i love old ford iron but i alawys thought ford is more cheap built i even like when old fords have chevy or dodge motors i owned one ford and realy didnt like it i hated that truck then i my budy bought a trighten 2002 ford f150 and i totaly started hating ford right their i work on trucks for people and have put new computers in 5 year old trucks its nuts i wouldent take a ford if some one gave it to me id be like give some one else your problems
@15:28. I was expecting to hear 'Beep Beep' @23:08 What is it with Gun Nuts in that Country? The Corvair, the car that sold a Million Books . I wonder how many flipped making the Videos? The 62s and 63s were Ugly Cars. In 1966 they looked much better
![[UNCUT] The Loyal Pin ปิ่นภักดิ์ EP.15 (3/4)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IVwR87OH0_A/mqdefault.jpg)
I just ordered a '63 Chevy Impala with a 327 with a 4 speed from my local Chevy dealer.
if only we could...
And it was under $4000
250 or 300 horse?
I splurged, went with the 425 horse 409 with aluminum intake and solid lifters.
Lol.
While in High School (1968) I had a '62 Impala SS 409 4spd with dual 4bl carbs and factory HP heads. It' passed everything on the road
except the gas stations! I could actually watch my gas needle slowly go down as i drove it, (but High Tech Ethyl gas back then was only .43c gallon).
It came factory without PS or PB and had a very stiff clutch. But it was sure fun to cruise around town in. ;-)
Everybody had promo films. They were commercials so yes, biased. Everybody knows that. You were selling a product so you highlighted the bonuses and downplayed the negatives. It's no different today with everything from cellphones to cars. Thanks for the video!
And they even tried to turn their negatives into bonuses and the other guys bonuses into negatives.
As one commentator, indeed one “Ima quigmire,” put it, “Everybody knows that.” But did you know you can save fifteen percent or more on car insurance by switching to GEICO?
And we always were able to predict who won on their races.
*When I was a kid...we had TWO cars that I thought were 'the coolest ever'...a '64 'Country Squire' wagon...and my mother had a '64 Impala 'SS' w/a 'FOUR-O-NINE' in it! Burgundy w/white 'tuck & roll' inside and an automatic 'T' handle on the floor...I still think that was a 'sweet looking car'...and the Ford wagon was white with red vinyl inside w/an electric window you could control from the dash...that one was a '390' and I liked them both!* ( *We had a '58 Olds 'Holiday Sedan'...and that car was a 'beauty' to drive cross-country from Dearborn to Las Vegas in...we had a cat named 'Tabber J' and one time he jumped from the front to the back and peed on me while I was sleeping on the back-seat...he just couldn't 'hold-it' for the next stop!* ) *The one thing I miss most from 'then' is VENT-WINDOWS and the 'pull for outside-air' control on the dash...no motor, just air rushing into the intakes and coming thru all the vents and the heater outlet as you drove...and I miss the comfortable seats from that era too...why can't they make 'comfy- seats' any more?* *New cars are far better than the '60's ever were...but why are seats so damn uncomfortable?*
409 was the ultimate sleeper car, because it looked like something your granny drove to and from church. But put your granny in a race with a Mustang, it she'll smoke that young "whipper snapper"!
My dad bought his new 63 Impala SS on a year-end close-out on Nov 22nd 1963, the day JFK was assassinated. I was 2 years old and don't remember it but it was a story that was passed down to me. I guess everyone was shocked and crying on the drive home with the new Impala. 14 years later the old man gave me the Impala, what a bad ass ride! I said 'gave it to me', what I meant was 'I had to work my ass off (at his liquidation business) to earn it'. Neither of my older sisters wanted it, dumb broads.
Wow as being born on day President Kennedy won the election I can remember the story so thanks November 7th 1960 hey your sisters were raised to respect their man as that was their only Job correct
My Dad drove all these old cars and Ford was his choice for Reliability.
I bet you drove him crazy.
fix or repair daily?
Pretty interesting, I like these, ..... but these do seem “fixed”. 😁
📻👍
different gear ratios make more of a difference than horsepower
Paul Kersey perfect example of manufacturer biased advertising lol
Just a bit....
Gasoline quality counts also...
Who's Grandmother is driving those Fords
The 283 was the best motors they was then the 327 & 350 I love Chevrolets anyway there the best builds automobiles ever made in the USA
In the 1960's, GM had 52% of the car market, the other 20 brands split up the other 48%... until the Govt declared them a monopoly and told them to sell less... or get broken up into pieces... of course, selling less can become a hard thing to stop...
Dad drove a 63 327 Impala 4Door Sport Sedan, fantastic Car, such a smooth ride and good performance.
Back in those days I always had Chevys. I got a Galaxie loaner once with a 390, stick shift. It was a dog but I thought it must have been worn out or something. After seeing this I can see why the Galaxie felt like a dog compared to the Chevies I was used to driving. The 61 thru 64 model years were a Chevy Golden Age.
I have always loved the look over cab-over design. That Corvair 95 truck was really cool. Ultimate project venhcle!
This was... HILARIOUS !!!
I already knew this from my experience with some of the car's back in the seventies!
Displaying the differential gearing would make the demonstration even more dramatic.
29:15 - I'm sure what's seen in this promo is exaggerated, but those Corvairs COULD actually take a lot of punishment for an air-cooled, rear-engined compact! My father had a Monza version back in the day, and it went through a lot of hell, and didn't take much to keep it maintained... "Screw you, Ralph Nader!"
If the Corvair van was so good, why wasn't it around for 1965, yet the Econoline stuck around until 2011??
1964 through 1966 G10s were essentially Corvair vans with Chevy pickup drive-lines. Same doors, dash, brakes etc.
Two words: Ralph Nader
Nothing like unbiased advertising
To pesent this baloney, Chevy must have had zero respect for the intelligence of its sales force and it's customers.
The corvair was marketed until april 1969.
I love how there's no smoke coming out of that lady's cigarette
It's not lady like to show smoke!
LOL those acceleration runs were so rigged!
Thank you, Captain Obvious.
Lol They put blocks of wood under the gas pedal
...SOMEBODY GIVE "T" A COOKIE!
@@hymlog For sure. That's how we do things in this country! Cheat. Thanks for confirming
@@twilliams8041 ....The Diagnosis IS Very Clear Now...
OMG this was filmed in my area like 5yrs before I was born 👁👁😎😎👍🏾👍🏾 I was on all three roads mentioned just a cpl of days ago.
Next car I buy is gonna be 1962 - 65 Chevy Nova (restored) 194 6cyl 3 spd manual trans. No EGR valve / O2 sensor /catylitic converter /ECM / electronic add on crap.
The car will have much better value after 10 yrs use than ANYTHING sold new today - guaranteed!
The Corvair vans were great off road. Used to drive them in the woods and camp in them.
Bet the drivers selected to drive this Circus were GM Engineers. This film would make an Honest man twist ….
In the 1960's, GM had 52% of the car market, the other 20 brands split up the other 48%... until the Govt declared them a monopoly and told them to sell less... or get broken up into pieces... of course, selling less can become a hard thing to stop...
Yes even though it is a promotional for Chevrolet. It was true that GM was far ahead of every competitor at that time.
To bad they are not today.
first car 62 impala ,283 pg paid $100 for it 2nd car a 62 biscayne 409 3 speed ,paid $250 it was called bisquick wish i still had it ,both never gave me any issues and drove them like a race car everywhere dependability hell yea
Almost 2021 these companies would never put this much time n money in anything
46:30 does somebody know in wich town in FL this one was filmed? Thanks for infos.
are we supposed to believe GM hired neutral drivers? And that they'd film something they weren't sure they'd win? Come on....
In the 1960's, GM had 52% of the car market, the other 20 brands split up the other 48%... until the Govt declared them a monopoly and told them to sell less... or get broken up into pieces... of course, selling less can become a hard thing to stop...
Room? Thing you know they gonna say a Mad Arab can fly a jumbo jet airliner
They couldn't work against the GM ,against GM that was a inside competition
This was really cool I liked all the General Motors products from the 60s
So did everyone else... In the 1960's, GM had 52% of the car market, the other 20 brands split up the other 48%... until the Govt declared them a monopoly and told them to sell less... or get broken up into pieces... of course, selling less can become a hard thing to stop...
I think the producer brought a bag of potatoes to stick up the tail pipes of all the Fords.
That made me laugh!
wow, that "dramatic proof", was "highly spectacular."
The funny part is it actually works on some people
I was chuckling when the 327 Impala was squaring off against the Ford and Mopar; neither of the latter two had their engines described. Note it took the 300 HP 327 to do the deed, to boot.
Said Mopar 318" and Ford 352"...
Thats so true about Fords trucks and cars. They are like tin cans. No insulation.
This is marvelous
Wow 62 is u
Fun advertising Baja vehicles
I loved the muscle cars from the late sixties and early seventies, my 1st car was a big-block 1969 skylark, a little hard on gas but could it move
So remember when you go looking for the lost Dutchman gold mine. In the superstition mountains.. always drive a Chevrolet....
Boy!.. Can't wait to get my hands on a hands on a 63 Chevy & race airplanes down the highway!
The falcon pulled up and shut it off before he got out wow.
Cool video, Thumbs Up and wishing you and your subs a good weekend.
The little Nash Rambler kept tooting his horn.. cause he wanted to pass me by!
Beep! Beep!...Beep! Beep!
His horn went Beep! Beep! Beep!
My first car was a 65 chevy impala SS
It wasn’t to fast because it only had a 283 under the hood with a power glide transmission but it sure was nice looking and it only cost me 300 dollars in 1972
the station wagons are the mid-sized SUVs and Crossovers of that era man, lol...
CHEVY 327, Ford 292, PLYMOUTH 273 motors
In Brazil, at that time we had, Volks.....DKW......Simca......Aero Willys ....Dauphine.....
The sad thing is that there won't be any more antique cars for our kids to enjoy their all made out of plastic junk.
50 some years later Chevy is still whooping Ford's ass!
Nothing can beat the raw power and acceleration of the Chryslers , suspension is far superior to all the rest and m
ANNNND Smoking a NON filtered cigarette at the same time!!! Haaaa , great times when I was a kid.God let me go back......I miss all my ww2 uncles!gtjoey1314
I grew up on Chevys, but I noticed they never test a Fairlane V8, LOL.
Gee whiz, I gonna get me a Chevy and move to Scottsdale!
Oh no, too late, this is 58 years ago ...
and that Corvair turned out to be "Unsafe at Any Speed".
There is no ride like the '63 Impala.
*I think that 'engine-turned' rub-strip on the '64 was the 'ultimate in style' and the 'Impala' logo-in a-circle was really 'something...and something about the styling and the 'look' of Chevys & Fords from that era reallygets me, probably because I was growing-up and actually had an attention-span longer than 5-minutes!*( *I don't want those times back...but that era WAS 'coolest ever' for a kid, at least to me it was* )
An Incredible amount of sales and testing effort went into these commercials... All of the earlier vehicles were so much easier to work on and keep running properly, than the modern vehicles... It is too bad that the IDIOT Ralph (the mouth) Nader LIED about the supposed 'handling problems' of the Chevy Corvairs. What was unsafe at any speed, was the movement of his pen and his mouth...
I would like to see the Ford and Chrysler versions as well
In the 1960's, GM had 52% of the car market, the other 20 brands split up the other 48%... until the Govt declared them a monopoly and told them to sell less... or get broken up into pieces... of course, selling less can become a hard thing to stop....
I think ill buy a Chevy 2 with a 327 and fly it around the world
1962 Corvair as an action car. Cool.
The race against the airplanes: they started with a Cessna 310, but in the next scene it was racing a Beechcraft Baron-? What? Is Donald Trump handling this race?
If it was Biden they'd have to stop for a nap & a pee brake!
God you are obsessed!
WTF has Trump or anyone to do with this?
@@mkaestn Richard Nixon is dead. And Trump is soon to be UNEMPLOYED.
Have a nice day~! Heh heh!
Sounds like actor Stacy Harris as the narrator in the 2nd film
yes with bumpers that could go through a house and not get scratched
noticed no pontiacs in this test if there was pontiac would have smoked them all lol
funny i just watched the 66 ad and chevelle ss smoked the Giant Traveling Obstacle and the rest of them
I wonder why they don't test cars like this any, oh yeah ... the plastic bumpers would scrape off and you might even bend a rim or two.
What this tells me is that it was MUCH easier to cheat in various ways back then........My sister drove a 1959 Falcon for her first car and it started in bitter cold when any other car in the neighborhood would not! And this was the late 70s....no rust either.
TAKE MY MONEY!
Chevy all the way.........!
I think our future is to use the technics & chassis architecture + some modern components in Fuel injection, but all over more the cheaper "Low Tec" like used in the US 60s/70s cars + the V8 engine! I think this is the right way for future, because those cars are a lot more economic, could be self repaired, and in manufacturing it use more manpower. less full automaitic manufacturing. because only with a way with a mix of both earas are really good for future! And i think straight 6 + V8 engines are the best motors in all situations! mixed with some motor management, and fuel injection you got the best engines/Motors for cars! They could be used and hold alife for so long time, that this is the right way about really environment protection! Because a tiny 4 cyl engine with a lot of supercharged boost istn´t a good way for a lifetime of a motor! And eclectric cars, just forgett that old, so heaviely environment destruction technic.. No, Eclectric cars aren´t future! That ist a very bad joke to call E-Cars "future" ore somesting else like that ;) (It´s only a governmental arenda what will take us the only good way about cars. that´s no joke. that´s only a bad agenda! the loosers under that agenda are we, the cars, the tchnic, engineering and almost the environment... E-Cars are so bad for all.
I´m a professional specialist for Cars and engines. I know about what I´m talking about. And i think so...
The designs were so good for Cameros, Mustangs, T-Birds, and Challengers that they had to be essentially brought back for a new generation that happily bought them.
There is a reason Chevy was #1 then. Now we can see why. It's called engineering. Cars are designed and engineered by people.
Souped up ringers.
Yo tengo todavia un Impala 1961y funciona como el primer dia y muchas de las cosas dichas en este video son ciertas como la suspencion que es capaz de mantenr un vaso de agua sobre el tablero y no derramar una gota
El Impala gana sobre todo Los otros !
@@oceanhome2023 Otra del impala ,puedes abrir las ventanas a 100 Kph y no entra viento ni ruido a dentro La aerdinamica del impala es UNICA!
UAW, Chevrolet, and the democratic party all in the same.
Oh what a surprise... In tests run by Chevy, the Chevys always win. As the saying goes, "Who'd eh thunk it?"
Funny! Ive never seen the Lone Ranger run from any bad guys!
Oh wow Joey chitwood remember Chevy gave him whatever he wanted to make good shows at every fair across America. And sell their cars as the safest cars without any seatbelts/ and solid steel dashboards with no padding .2019 not .
That fury had a shaker hood !see the USA in your Chevrolet sing it Dinah!
Apparently in 1962 car commercials were adapted from political campaigns.
Now do a 1991 Ford Ranger vs/ a 1991 Chevy s10. All the same tests.
Chevy would yet again win
I had a 63 Biscayne 2 door sedan with 3 on the tree that had a 6 but I pulled it and dropped a 275HP 327 in out of a 67 . Used to shut down 440 Chryslers with it....hahaha .
A properly set up L79 Nova could smoke a Chrysler hemi.
Yup, Chevy paid the Ford drivers to "throw" the comparisons.
This film was intended for the sales staff, not the customers. So how would a sales person even use what was presented?
"I saw a race in the desert where an Impala beat a Galaxie even though it first had to take a u-turn!".
Sure buddy...
Corvair was the best car GM ever made.
Lol the fellow on the right with the light trousers looks to be fairly compromised at 1:21.
If it weren't for the loose hood I sure ,what they were not loose???
Also I think it's funny how people believe no one cared about fuel economy back then. Obviously they did
No really at 22,cents per gallon you worries were health care and food prices/ kind of like today but on steroids!
@@supergranddad6364 I wasn't alive then, but my dad was. They didn't worry about healthcare. They had a town doctor. And they all knew no one lived forever. Food prices? Yea everyone since the beginning of time worried about that. Because the price of food is what you pay at the market, or the labor you put into it at home.
In 1962, The standard V-8 for the full sized Chevrolet was the 283 170 to 195 HP engine, not the 250 HP 327. Plymouth had the 318 230 HP and Ford the 289 170 to 195 HP. I would imagine a 327 would out accelerate the other engines. It also appeared some cars had automatic transmission and the Chevy II had manual. Always a plus compared to the 2 speed Powerglide. All of these comparisons are rigged to a certain degree. Those cars were not made to haul 1100 lbs of cement. In my opinion, all of those cars had pluses and minuses depending on what the buyer wants. My dad had a 1962 Fury with a 383 4 barrel which would have shut down the Chevy with the 327. They are comparing apples to oranges here but this was entertaining..
I thing you are incorrect on the ford 289. I believe you are referring to the 260. I don't think the 289 came out until around 1965.
With almost 60 more cubes, that Fury had BETTER beat the 327
@@cudaus1 Still incorrect. The ford standard engine was the y block 292 in 1962. 289 was in 1963.
@@eugeneschulte4950 Show proof that there was a 289 in 1963. I would love to see it. Then I will admit I was wrong.
@@eugeneschulte4950 I just checked it out. You are correct. The first one I remember was 1965. I had a 65 Comet Cyclone that was a 289. I also remember the 260 prior to that. Even though I'm old enough to remember cars from the 50's and 60's, I don't remember 289's prior to late 64 or 65. You have my apology sir. I'll stick to Mopar's. I had many more of those.
Speed & Powe don't matter, perhaps pre-1973 but to just drive t oh work or Walmart, who cares? Well designed, built, with good MPG is what you need!
The Plymouth valiants were some of the ugliest cars back then, I remembered them from way back then, most the of the ones I saw were usually police cars,
They restyled them in '68, but yeah, that fake tire on the trunk rounded out a really ugly car in the early 60's!
Car 54 where are you ? lol
Wouldnt it be fair to say that the company that's marketing their vehicle is always going to win any races during the promo?
If you try to drift a corvair, you will end up going backwards, a fun amount of oversteer
Why is the taillight out on the "new" car on the right 🤔🤔😳 the Chevy II
Too funny at 15:15. I think that was the Valiant driver. Oh well....shoulda bought the Chevy.
U can't beat a Ford first car on the road
I guess what i can't believe is that in the first clip is that shitty looking Valiant was right on that chevy 2's heals! It's Valiant for me if this was rigged! Hell watch, the Valiant even missed a gear on takeoff.
omg the stupid risks they took-- no helmets, crazy
Wanda James good cars.
Wanda: And no seat belts also no daytime headlights. (Oh, I remember as a kid, on coming drivers would turn on and off their headlights and wave their arms out the car to say we were driving with our headlights on during the day).
Wait no computer to mess up no auto stop no chip key wow can we get it today
The problem with Fords, even then, is there was very little variety among their product line. Everything was "cookie cutter", just a bigger version of the same car. Whereas Chevrolets had style and variety in their lineup--every car looked different and there was something for every taste. Not true today--where every SUV looks the same and the only choices you get are mini, little, medium, large, or extra large of the same SUV
What year did Bob Cook die?
I want a 62 impala ............
got me sold
46:58 hey the impala was the first one to go. No wonder it was the first car to beat that challenge. They should have had the other 2 on 2 other streets and then we can really see who won
Wow it was a real cut throat business in them days....🤣
Pepsi is still better than coke . Madonna and Michael Jackson drank pepsi! Lol
Iove chevy nothing is history and i love old ford iron but i alawys thought ford is more cheap built i even like when old fords have chevy or dodge motors i owned one ford and realy didnt like it i hated that truck then i my budy bought a trighten 2002 ford f150 and i totaly started hating ford right their i work on trucks for people and have put new computers in 5 year old trucks its nuts i wouldent take a ford if some one gave it to me id be like give some one else your problems
Of course the 'efforts' of the drivers who didn't drive a Chev had nothing to do with it, haha!
@15:28. I was expecting to hear 'Beep Beep'
@23:08 What is it with Gun Nuts in that Country?
The Corvair, the car that sold a Million Books . I wonder how many flipped making the Videos?
The 62s and 63s were Ugly Cars. In 1966 they looked much better