Sea Harrier FA2 - Update SEEK & DESTROY Dev Server - War Thunder

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 57

  • @garyyoung3179
    @garyyoung3179 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    GR.9 is the only missing Harrier with improved avionics and targeting pods compared to the GR7 as well as some improved weaponry most notably the integration of Brimstone 20km+ 'fire and forget' missiles.

    • @dylangregory4161
      @dylangregory4161 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      There's also the Indian Sea Harriers which have some fun weapons

    • @RedXlV
      @RedXlV 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@dylangregory4161 You'd get 2x Magic and 2x Derby on refitted Indian Sea Harrier. Because they didn't bother with the fuselage hardpoints like the FA.2 has.

    • @zachattack_the_imperialist6065
      @zachattack_the_imperialist6065 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tornado IDS also has brimstone’s but I don’t know what variant specifically

    • @garyyoung3179
      @garyyoung3179 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@zachattack_the_imperialist6065 Brimstone (1&2) was integrated onto RAF Tornado GR4s as well as Saudi Tornado IDS. Qatar has purchased Brimstone 2 for its Typhoons while Spain and Germany have purchased Brimstone 3 for their Tranche 2/3 Typhoons.

  • @TheFlyingSpanner1
    @TheFlyingSpanner1 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    There’s a couple of bug reports in.
    The duel 9M rail should have access to BOL rails too, along with the AMRAAM wing rails. Both acknowledged and should end up,coming on live.

  • @sebastiankillin7940
    @sebastiankillin7940 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    honestly has potential as a good fighter for GRB. nobody will expect it and it fits at 11.7. take x2 9M, x2 120B, and a cannon and just sneak around. when youre out of ammo you can just land at heli pads.

  • @prmoh1027
    @prmoh1027 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    the engine is wrong should be mk 106:
    Pegasus 11-21 (Mk.105 / Mk.106)
    The 11-21 was developed for the second generation Harriers, the USMC AV-8B Harrier II and the BAE Harrier IIs. The original model provided an extra 450 lbf (2.0 kN). The RAF Harriers entered service with the 11-21 Mk.105, the AV-8Bs with F402-RR-406. Depending on time constraints and water injection, between 14,450 lbf (64.3 kN) (max. continuous at 91% RPM) and 21,550 lbf (95.9 kN) (15 s wet at 107% RPM) of lift is available at sea level (including splay loss at 90°).The Mk.106 development was produced for the Sea Harrier FA2 upgrade and generates 21,750 lbf (96.7 kN).

  • @BugattiONE666
    @BugattiONE666 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    People crying about Bison and F4F being dead on arrival when this exists xD

    • @MeanHereAT
      @MeanHereAT 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Lmao

    • @Pagan-71
      @Pagan-71 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Bison doesn't get fox 3's and F4F is pathetically outmatched by every other fox 3 jet which is Germany's only choice. Britain now get a fighter and an attacker with fox 3's which is very strong for a ground rb line up. I'm glad this exists.

    • @MeanHereAT
      @MeanHereAT 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      There is a reason why the F is before the A for the Sea Harriers, so really two fighters as the RAF Harriers were more suited to ground attack.

    • @purgetrapscorp
      @purgetrapscorp 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Not every plane has to be top tier seal clubber. Sure, top tier should be decompressed for breathing room, but at least a select few who like these planes get to fly them.

    • @MeanHereAT
      @MeanHereAT 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Imagine new vehicles not being top of the line every update 😫

  • @freddiejohames8332
    @freddiejohames8332 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    My favourite part of this is that Britain will never again not have a comptetive top tier plane. In terms of top tier Britian now has quite a lot of options.

    • @datcheesecakeboi6745
      @datcheesecakeboi6745 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      no it doesnt, top tier has been moved up, it still doesnt have a native built top tier aircraft

    • @freddiejohames8332
      @freddiejohames8332 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@datcheesecakeboi6745 12.7 is basically top tier as 90% of the matches will be agasint 13.0. and most of the matches for a 12.3 will be 13.0. and so what if it isnt native? a plane is still a plane.

    • @datcheesecakeboi6745
      @datcheesecakeboi6745 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@freddiejohames8332 oh its fine then, let britian only good planes be copy pastes why not! why dont you go play italy? italy techinally has the best top tier despite having basically 0 native aircraft
      also it doesnt matter, 12.3 isnt top tier, just like how 11.7 isnt top tier despite being able to face the old top tier
      btw the jas39 is literally the now 4th best top tier jet.. out of like 5 jets, the f15c, f16c and mig are all alot better then it

    • @freddiejohames8332
      @freddiejohames8332 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@datcheesecakeboi6745 well the alternative is nothing, and with fox 3s in what capacity are all the other jets so much better than it now?

    • @datcheesecakeboi6745
      @datcheesecakeboi6745 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@freddiejohames8332 uh.. flight model, speed and countermeasures? something that the sea harrier doesnt have, there are literally planes with more missiles and countermeasures then the sea harrier

  • @Kevin-wf6zu
    @Kevin-wf6zu 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    This is without doubt the best thing from this update hands down.

    • @kRIEG_elf
      @kRIEG_elf 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Joke of the year, for sure.

    • @Kevin-wf6zu
      @Kevin-wf6zu 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@kRIEG_elf what do you mean by that

    • @kRIEG_elf
      @kRIEG_elf 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Kevin-wf6zu It's a BR 10 plane at BR 12.3. It'll be completely at the mercy of reds.

    • @datcheesecakeboi6745
      @datcheesecakeboi6745 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@kRIEG_elf its not tho, its literally one of the best sea harriers ever built and its at 11.7 ground

    • @kRIEG_elf
      @kRIEG_elf 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@datcheesecakeboi6745 I'm talking about Air RB though. And as much as I love Sea Harriers, "one of the best Sea Harriers" doesn't mean much in BR12+.

  • @KingGuyles
    @KingGuyles 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I can see it going down to 12.0 with the CM or missiles trade off

  • @lewis666lewis
    @lewis666lewis 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    i think this would be awsome to use in air SB being a wing man and providing cover for a GR.7 that's doing ground work.

  • @KNMRoaldAmundsen
    @KNMRoaldAmundsen 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The gr9 and av-8b plus are remaining

  • @argentshrike516
    @argentshrike516 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Still no US Harrier 2

  • @kRIEG_elf
    @kRIEG_elf 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I don't understand how this is more than 11.3 or something like that. The airframe is easily the worst out of anything above BR 11 if it handles like the other Sea Harriers, unlike other ARH missile buses, to get full AIM-120 it needs go in unarmed and with very few flares. Looks like if the Nimrod would get AIM-120s, it would be at BR 12.0.

    • @garyyoung3179
      @garyyoung3179 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It should handle a little better with the upgraded engines I would think.

    • @kRIEG_elf
      @kRIEG_elf 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@garyyoung3179 It didn't seem to be any less brick-like in Mat's video to be honest. Gaijin seems to think it had Pegasus 101 whilst in fact it had Pegasus 106 which is used in the Harrier II as well I think (so GR.7).

  • @harrywisfitt
    @harrywisfitt 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The sea harriers also need their drop tanks

  • @lixiangdong9821
    @lixiangdong9821 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why they give the sea harrier 2, why not the harrier gr9

  • @charlestut9876
    @charlestut9876 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What is HMD

    • @ccursedfool
      @ccursedfool 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Helmet Mounted Display

  • @harrywisfitt
    @harrywisfitt 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Isn’t the fa2 meant to have access to anti-shipping missiles ?

    • @RedXlV
      @RedXlV 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      In theory it could have, but apparently by the time the FA.2 upgrade was carried out, the Royal Navy had grand total of *three* Sea Eagle missiles left in stock. So they were never tested on the FA.2. It's insane how tiny the British military budget was in the 90s.