FTB FILM STUDY is brought to you by CONCIERGE MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, leaders in the advancement of Sports Medicine! SCHEDULE AN IN-PERSON OR REMOTE CONSULTATION: conciergemedical.ai/ DIRECT LINE: 203-822-5450 Whether you're a weekend warrior or a pro/college athlete, let Dr. Steven Murphy and his board-certified sports medicine specialists at Concierge Medical Associates keep you at the top of your game.
Thank u. While the others focused on JF’s comment about the airport u provided terrific information. This is priceless and we all appreciate your commentary
In a press conference a few weeks back Franklin said he would prefer deep balls to be underthrown instead of overthrown so the WR can make a play on the ball as oppose to having no chance if it's overthrown. Ever since hearing that I've noticed Drew doing that not leading his WRs as much on deep shots.
My question would be if your WR has a step why under throw and let the WR make an uncontested catch. I’m no fan of trying to make these refs part of my play book
@@bamapsu6906 I think because there's a fundamental difference between underthrown and "underthrown" because the ball died, poor mechanics, etc. There is a *huge* benefit in consistency with how the receiver expects the ball to come in. If your QB can't drop it in the perfect spot in stride every time (which, let's be real, outside of a Rodgers or Manning, you aren't getting - especially at the college level), it's better for the receivers to usually be expecting to slow up at the top of their routes a bit and potentially fight back through the defender. It takes some of the pressure off the QB, where every ball doesn't have to be perfect, they just need to be *good*. 50/50 balls are a misnomer. On an intentionally underthrown or back shoulder ball, the receiver still has a pretty sizable advantage, even against a superior defender. Letting them go do their thing means that overall plays have a higher chance for success, even before BS like getting into playing for PI. It's just a happy accident that a decent amount of the time the DB might also get you yardage just trying to make the play.
That's standard deep-ball coaching. If you overthrow it, nobody has a chance to catch it. That's a dead play. If you underthrow it, you give your receiver either a chance to win a 50-50 ball or to get a PI call. The receiver has to be put in position to make a play for the QB.
Coach, do you think the Pribula plays mess with Drew's flow or rhythm? Unless there's more imagination to them coming down the road, I'm not sure what the Pribula plays bring to the offense other than taking the ball out of Drew's hands for a random play...which seems counterproductive.
So we discussed it and we're not quite sure how to ILLUSTRATE it. I think we'll have Codutti on that Keystone Kickoff Radio show that we sometimes air during the bye week to talk about it...because we just don't know how we'd display it in a film study format.
Penn State fan since 1966. This has the potential to be one of the better teams. Allar seems to be a slow starter before he settles in, his misses come early on in games, I hope this gets corrected.
So how has Allar really changed from last year? When he played UMD and MSU, and had all day, he looked like a Heisman QB. Any sort of real pass rush from OSU, Mich, Miss, and even Rutgers and Indiana, he gets happy feet and struggled. Why would he not revert to the same Allar as last year when we play OSU?
On the 3rd pass to Fleming in your video an insider on one of the message boards (not TFrank) said it was actually a good throw, that if Allar led Fleming he was getting drilled by the DB, which he would have. He said Fleming should have sat down on the route and Allar purposely threw behind him to not lead him into a big hit. IDK if that's true or not but it's an interesting take. How is Fleming supposed to know to sit down and not continue his route if he's unaware of the DB?
He should be aware of the DB because he should recognize the coverage. Drew threw him away from getting killed. Even the first throw of the drive while maybe a tad short it was a catchable ball low and away from the defender.
@@claysauertieg4792 Lol...Clay you were the insider I was referring to. I dont disagree with you on the throw not leading the DB. But the low throw was mainly on Drew IMO.
I see so much good with Allar but games like the Illinois one and the beginning of this are somewhat infuriating to watch. So when the passing game is simplified he's better, thoughts on him as a pro prospect? I see first round TALENT but the inconsistent accuracy bothers me.
I think the tools and measurables will make him an end of 1st round selection this year at worst. Scouts will like his upside more than some of the qbs ahead of him currently in mock drafts.
FTB FILM STUDY is brought to you by CONCIERGE MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, leaders in the advancement of Sports Medicine!
SCHEDULE AN IN-PERSON OR REMOTE CONSULTATION: conciergemedical.ai/
DIRECT LINE: 203-822-5450
Whether you're a weekend warrior or a pro/college athlete, let Dr. Steven Murphy and his board-certified sports medicine specialists at Concierge Medical Associates keep you at the top of your game.
I’ve been waiting for a Drew breakdown
Always anticipate these Film Studies. So good.
Our guy! Thanks man!
This
Thank u. While the others focused on JF’s comment about the airport u provided terrific information. This is priceless and we all appreciate your commentary
In a press conference a few weeks back Franklin said he would prefer deep balls to be underthrown instead of overthrown so the WR can make a play on the ball as oppose to having no chance if it's overthrown. Ever since hearing that I've noticed Drew doing that not leading his WRs as much on deep shots.
i was wondering if anyone else caught on to that
My question would be if your WR has a step why under throw and let the WR make an uncontested catch. I’m no fan of trying to make these refs part of my play book
@@bamapsu6906 I agree
@@bamapsu6906 I think because there's a fundamental difference between underthrown and "underthrown" because the ball died, poor mechanics, etc.
There is a *huge* benefit in consistency with how the receiver expects the ball to come in. If your QB can't drop it in the perfect spot in stride every time (which, let's be real, outside of a Rodgers or Manning, you aren't getting - especially at the college level), it's better for the receivers to usually be expecting to slow up at the top of their routes a bit and potentially fight back through the defender.
It takes some of the pressure off the QB, where every ball doesn't have to be perfect, they just need to be *good*. 50/50 balls are a misnomer. On an intentionally underthrown or back shoulder ball, the receiver still has a pretty sizable advantage, even against a superior defender. Letting them go do their thing means that overall plays have a higher chance for success, even before BS like getting into playing for PI. It's just a happy accident that a decent amount of the time the DB might also get you yardage just trying to make the play.
That's standard deep-ball coaching. If you overthrow it, nobody has a chance to catch it. That's a dead play. If you underthrow it, you give your receiver either a chance to win a 50-50 ball or to get a PI call. The receiver has to be put in position to make a play for the QB.
Coach, do you think the Pribula plays mess with Drew's flow or rhythm? Unless there's more imagination to them coming down the road, I'm not sure what the Pribula plays bring to the offense other than taking the ball out of Drew's hands for a random play...which seems counterproductive.
So we discussed it and we're not quite sure how to ILLUSTRATE it. I think we'll have Codutti on that Keystone Kickoff Radio show that we sometimes air during the bye week to talk about it...because we just don't know how we'd display it in a film study format.
Penn State fan since 1966. This has the potential to be one of the better teams. Allar seems to be a slow starter before he settles in, his misses come early on in games, I hope this gets corrected.
Very true. He starts every game nervous and jumpy.
I don't think nervous, as much as too anxious!!!!! WE ARE, 27-13 Saturday at the Coliseum, Nittany Lions 🦁 keep winning 👏!!!!!
These are so good 👍
So how has Allar really changed from last year? When he played UMD and MSU, and had all day, he looked like a Heisman QB. Any sort of real pass rush from OSU, Mich, Miss, and even Rutgers and Indiana, he gets happy feet and struggled. Why would he not revert to the same Allar as last year when we play OSU?
Lovevit!!!!!
Consistent feet, consistent feats
That would be Drew. Occasional misfire short, look great hitting the seam. Did he see the safety help on the at nullified interception?
That was partly Omari's fault. He has to have the strength to fight through the hold and either win a 50-50 ball or break up the pass.
On the 3rd pass to Fleming in your video an insider on one of the message boards (not TFrank) said it was actually a good throw, that if Allar led Fleming he was getting drilled by the DB, which he would have. He said Fleming should have sat down on the route and Allar purposely threw behind him to not lead him into a big hit. IDK if that's true or not but it's an interesting take. How is Fleming supposed to know to sit down and not continue his route if he's unaware of the DB?
@@PSU2024 IMO the WR should have sat and I believe that is what Allar read and what he expected
He should be aware of the DB because he should recognize the coverage. Drew threw him away from getting killed.
Even the first throw of the drive while maybe a tad short it was a catchable ball low and away from the defender.
@@claysauertieg4792 Lol...Clay you were the insider I was referring to. I dont disagree with you on the throw not leading the DB. But the low throw was mainly on Drew IMO.
They need to take the handcuffs off of Drew in my opinion. Especially if there's no Nick next week, Drew should be throwing the ball like 30 times.
I see so much good with Allar but games like the Illinois one and the beginning of this are somewhat infuriating to watch. So when the passing game is simplified he's better, thoughts on him as a pro prospect? I see first round TALENT but the inconsistent accuracy bothers me.
I think the tools and measurables will make him an end of 1st round selection this year at worst. Scouts will like his upside more than some of the qbs ahead of him currently in mock drafts.
Play calling too conservative