Dear Jason at 11:30 you get the k2/pie w * g(t)... I get 2/pie * d/dx u(o,t). Can you please help me understand how you got your result ? thank you in advance
You have to integrate by parts to get to this result. It’s how you normally take the Fourier transform of derivatives, but if you integrate by parts twice you will arrive at his result.
I have been working on the problem for 3-4 days before I saw this video. I’m only asking because my final answer doesn’t satisfy one of the boundary conditions and I can’t seem to figure out why.
Dear Jason at 11:30 you get the k2/pie w * g(t)... I get 2/pie * d/dx u(o,t). Can you please help me understand how you got your result ? thank you in advance
You have to integrate by parts to get to this result. It’s how you normally take the Fourier transform of derivatives, but if you integrate by parts twice you will arrive at his result.
In the case of the forcing term what does the solution look like after inverse transforms and convolutions are taken?
I wouldn't be a very good teacher if I just told you the answer. You should have all the tools in place to answer this question yourself.
I have been working on the problem for 3-4 days before I saw this video. I’m only asking because my final answer doesn’t satisfy one of the boundary conditions and I can’t seem to figure out why.