The Big Bang Was Wrong!? The Universe Cannot Come From NOTHING!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 ก.ย. 2024
- Why is there something rather than nothing?
How did everything begin?
What was there before the beginning?
Where did the material come from that created the Big Bang?
What happened in the first instance to create that material?
Why are we here?
I believe that we, as humans, simply cannot comprehend that something has existed forever.
we really can't understand quantum reality that we can actually study and measure, e.g. wave/particle natures, quantum entanglement etc. Yes we can predict and mathematically model it but there is no "real world" mapping or analogy to imagine what we are observing there. So the universe is orders of magnitude less intelligible.
Yes we can, that's what many people say about their God, and some say it about our universe, the reason we believe in the big bang is bc we've observed that everything is moving away from eachother and tracking back those trajectories through time results in a single point
Personally I believe in infinite directions of time not just one or two and they go on infinitely
What about hot & cold?...
We cannot but we try to apply our logic to any and everything. Just like some need the thought that god did it to appease their discomfort
No matter what your answer is, whether Creator or Big Bang, at some point, it had to have came from nothing. Who created the Creator? If he was eternal and always just here, then why can't the "stuff" that made the big bang also be eternal and always just here, ready to make those interactions? And if it's a simulation, same answer, then the real universe still has to struggle with those answers.
Come on, everybody knows, it's the Christian God who did it. All the other endless Gods were/are fake. Only Jesus and his Dad and his uncle Allah... are real! It's gotta be those three Holy Trinities. They said so, too, in their HOLY BOOKS, the Bible and the Koran. And they also ask a very logical question, to those who don't believe them: If it's not WE --- Jesus, God, and All ---- then who? After all, SOMEBODY gotta do it.
Everyone knows, for example --- a trivial example but a sound one nonetheless --- if you throw trash around, someone has got to clean it; trash don't disappear into thin air on their own. Someone has to pick up that trash & put it in the trash can! Everything works like that.
Even 4 year-old's know that!
Only very stupid Liberals, who are into Satan and his brothers, Lucifer and the Devil, would deny the fact that Jesus, his Dad/God, and his Uncle Allah --- who have ALWAYS EXISTED --- created everything, from virtual particles to galaxies and super clusters and sheets of billions of galaxies....
And, yes, HEAVEN, too, where Jesus, his holy Mother, the Jewish Virgin girl, all the angles and archangels and the thousands of European saints the Pope/Catholic Church has beatified over the last 2,000 years....
P.S., as I've said, all the other Gods by all the other stupid, primitive tribes from the beginning of time until today... they're all fakes. Jesus said, in the Bible, he came down to the Middle East, at the height of the Universe, sent by his Dad, God, which is Jesus himself in another form, in Heaven.... and that he's the ONLY REAL DEAL!
science is the route of matter being left for infinity which evenutallly leads to a random explosion called the big bang (this cycle will repeat forever). religion is the route that god forced that matter together and shaped it himself (this in theory only happens once).
Then that "stuff" can't be accident. It has to be intelligence to stay eternal. Because accident, or random events can't happens without cause.
@@stormryder4305 the cause is infinity. wait long enough and matter will take every form possible including the forms of bombs. eventually an explosion big enough to overcome gravity will take place and boom big bang. infinity is basically a cheat code.
Everything starts from understanding
The concept of before and after the Universe is beyond what our minds can conceive. We can only function within boundaries, be them physical, ethereal or other.
❤❤❤
I don't know. I think my drawing of what I think is beyond the universe's expansion boundary is quite comprehensive. And I have plenty of hypothesis about before and after our universe. I don't think it's incomprehensible for our brains, but it does stretch our brains ability and most likely can't fathom it very well.
Like I think before our universe there was a singularity in a sea of dark matter billions maybe even trillions of lightyears away from another sigularity or even another "universe". Time has always been a forward momentum even before the big bang. This singularity that would eventually become our universe would blink in and out of existence, like a quantum fluctuation, until it finally stabilized in spacetime and expanded into our universe.
Well, I don't think it is what our minds can't conceive a before and an after, neither we can only live with boundaries. Our species have thrived and still are thriving thinking beyond boundaries, imagine the unimaginable and make it happen... And that started with creating fire...
Our mind (ego) is simply fouling itself by thinking everything has a beginning and an end. But simply put energy can't be created neither can be lost. Every single atom in yours or mine body is made out of stardust... What ever make us 'US' or our soul or consciousness, or whatever living creature we presume without, cannot be anything else than energy...
Think about that... We're not just spectators to an unimaginable large maybe indefinite universe, we're a conscious living part of it. Hence I don't care in whatever god one believes in or philosophy one follows, because - one way or the other - they ALL tell the same story, that NEVER was disproven: Energy doesn't get lost... It's just transforms into something else...
It's the commonly accepted understanding and concept of energy but whoever proves that wrong - aka energy does get lost at some point (even for a tiny bit) instead of being transformed into something else, not only wins a Nobel prize, but also proves every religion or philosophy to be wrong... Plus any interstellar traveling ;)
But that puts our universe within boundaries. Or our universe as part of a multiverse. The problem is trying to imagine why or how anything exists at all. @@InfiniteSkiegh
@ricf9592 Not really. The "sea of dark matter" is infinite and serves as a medium for the stabilization of singularities (formed in black holes [why it "blinks"... at least until the black hole is destroyed or evaporates. It's outside time until it's not being "fed". The infinite density of a singularity warps space time so drastically it's like it breaks it's tie to it. ] The absence of the black hole is what then allows the singularity to expand into a "universe". Watch Kurzgesagt's video"what happens if we destroyed a black hole?" For more info on black holes and their singularities. ) to appear and serves as a multiversal plane for the creation of "universes". It is within a brane (the higher dimensional plane that contains the multiversal plain of our universe (sea of dark matter) and particles probably are exchanged between them in a looping infinite system. They probably aren't even these domino shapes we imagine, but 4th or 5th dimensional objects which we have trouble perceiving. (Look up 4th dimensional object moving through 3rd dimensional space.)
I don't think we need to have an explanation of an infinity complex that just is. It has no beginning or end, past and present are illusions. We are just traveling it moment by moment because this 3 dimensional form only allows us to experience it that way.
Obviously we have no proof for any of this, but this is where my logic has brought me from the existential crisis I've been having since I was 10. 😅 I've put so much thought into this subject since I was a child and realized I was a projection of chemistry and 99.9999% empty space...you too...and the phone I'm typing on and you reading and the earth we're standing on...all 99.9999999999% empty space
Why is this a surprise, isn't it physics that say energy doesn't die, it remanifests? If energy can't die, it can't be born, it just exists.
correct
We are the energy itself. We just exist. Never born, just transform from one matter into the other.
What created energy, then?
@@watarimono17 None. Op just stated the principle of energy conservation, based on mathematics equation. And it is the first law of thermodynamics: Energy can neither be created nor destroyed. Like OP said, it just exists.
inifnite acceleration gives the brain the ability to grasp/fahom infinite space
-infinite acceleration of space as opening sequence of an infinite universe where planets are fed with stellar wind and stars and galaxies are fed with cosmic radiation
(cosmic radiation origin by entropy -as an infinete universe filled with cosmic radiation is of lower energy than an infinite vakuum)
For the next universe I vote for no commercials
If E = MCxc , then matter = Energy/ CXC. So matter has to be generated by action of light, in particulate state interacting with energy can generate mass.
Nope
A riddle shrouded in an enigma wrapped in a puzzle
Beyond any human understanding of existence
None of the questions asked can ever be snswered
Yes, because "snswered" is meaningless!!
@@Anarchy-Is-Liberty With your Anarchyisfreedom, you must be a loon
The answer is of itself - having a little light and dark - spinning slowly - while absorbing itself - within.
It nothing but - an amazing anarchy of meaning.
Maybe releasing - more salient questions - but without answers, of course.
This has been - discussed before.
There - chew gently - on that. (Pineapple and coconut flavour) Hee hee
(Just having a bit of ) Like your answer, though) Fare thee well @@Anarchy-Is-Liberty
Saying something came from nothing is another way of saying "I don't know what came/happened before that"
I was an experimental quantum physicist back in the 70’s and studied atomic and molecular collisions. I would calculate the diffraction patterns produced by these collisions without Schrödinger wave equations using simple geometry and Stoke’s law with other fundamental physical laws with a calculator. Never was the wave function even part of the calculation. Remember I actually experimented with real particles interacting with each other. I wasn’t some theoretician locked up in a cubicle with a pencil and paper. I argued with every physicist that would dare challenge me since the best they could say was, well you just don’t understand the mathematical equations used in quantum physics. Needless to say I left physics and became a pilot and had loads of fun and made a lot of money for only working a fraction, a little fraction, of the time.
Now I listen to these ridiculous theories that are unprovable and remember Ptolemy and the geocentric of solar system model which used elaborate gears and geometric contraptions to predict the positions of the planets. It didn’t do a bad job. Then came Copernicus, Kepler and Einstein. See where I am going.
All these theories are about the same level of that geocentric model and that elaborate contraption. We have not got a clue and until we know what dark energy and dark mass is and some “Copernicus” like physicists comes around all we do is come up with these theories. Virtual universe? Seriously. Stop watching the Matrix and get into a lab and leave that pad of paper and pencil at home.
th-cam.com/video/Or7pwR60ilE/w-d-xo.htmlsi=ZJ6DKDB1CaIm-T3_
Unprovable is very different than unfalsifiable and you should know the difference
k boomer. none of what you said is even true and you have a 2 inch d
maths are human made . useless in the big scale of the universe but makes sense for dumb humans
An "experimental quantum physicist" who doesn't know the science jargon meaning of "theory." I didn't think that possible. But, here you are.
I've got a headache.
😂
That sucks 😢 hope it's gone by now lol
Got just a knot Onkel my brain
😂😂
science is about 'what we know so far', so to say something is impossible is saying that we have bypassed the future discoveries and reached absolute knowledge.
Yes 👏🏽
Can you freeze fire?
Can you turn time back,, you" no other or someother,, na forget it,,,
@@paullynch7672 No, you cannot turn back. Everything is forward moving.
@@louseveryann2181 Apply scientific analysis and get your answer. I have a sinus headache and thus cannot answer from a scientific perspective right now but it can be deduced.
Physics can only answer the questions of how, but never answer the question of why.
True, but that's not a problem to be solved in physics or any branch of science. All why questions still require how questions. Otherwise, they are only hypotheses still in search of greater understanding. You won't have all the modern discoveries and technology science offers. You will give up a lot.
Physics can’t tell us how either, unless naturalism is the answer and even then some parts of nature seem to be out of reach.
That’s not true at all😂😂😂😂
it can't explain how something came from nothing
@@kkap895 Maybe so, but maybe not. There's no proof either way. But space and time cannot exist without something in it to measure. If something was always there, that implies there was always time and something inside some volume of space. That also makes no sense. To have no beginning to everything we see. Nothing could be as logical an explanation as anything else, hard though it is to grasp the concept.
I once had a discussion with a biology expert.
I asked how did all this start ?
His reply, In the beginning there was nothing. And then some dust formed.
My next question.
Where did this dust come from ?
He had a perplexed look on his face and then took off. Never talked about it again.
It's absolute madness to say the universe came from nothing! Why not admit some massively brilliant being started it all. Who made her or him is another question.
The dust was and is and will be always, what's make the difference is the Will which starts anything. It's like a light, you swicht on and you see, without your will to switch, the Nothing remain. The Light makes the difference bewteen Nothing and Thing. Well... many hebrew linguistics gems is genesis 1.1 and following, not revealed in the bible with their vulgare foreign translations.
Why not admit there's a god, is what you're saying. Because there's no proof. You can't just admit something without evidence. Her or Him? Thats a human label. You cannot label god male or female. Stop posting comments. It's for the best of everybody.
Your comment makes no sense. You criticize the dust coming from nothing, but you jump right to God existing and put off answering how God was created.
The same logic can be used for the dust. Where did the dust come from? That's another question so let's just believe it for now. Do you see how ridiculous that is?
Believe that which has evidence and dismiss the rest. "God" is easily dismissed as mere conjecture.
Should have asked a cosmologist (and the Biology guy seems really dumb) or you invented him like humans invent gods.
My reply, I only know what I know, and I know bullshit when I hear it.
Our understanding of physics is bound by the limits of our observations. As we push the limits of what we can observe, we might discover that the universe is fantastical, whimsical, and unpredictable beyond anything our understanding of science has so far constrained us to.
With trillions and billions everything exists . People don’t get that
I remember the first time I was taught the Big Bang in elementary school and I remember thinking that it made absolutely zero sense.
Wot~? A non-existing Nothing in the middle of nowhere suddenly explodes for no reason and creates the universe, and you can't understand that? Sheesh ... and they call ME dum ...
I don't know anybody who thinks the universes came from nothing, and nor has that ever been taught to me ??
I think if we can begin to understand what nothing is..... We might be on the trail to something
I've always said, you can't make a cake without ingredients 😂
Y is there something rather than nothing? Because nothing doesn’t exist....try to imagine ‘nothing’, it’s impossible.
Impossible is possible.
@@sonny5069 then imagine how nothingness looks like.🙂
The closest to nothing we can get is a vacuum state and even then there's still quantum particles blinking in and out of existence. 😅
@@InfiniteSkiegh and even a vacuum is something, otherwise you wouldn’t call it a vacuum. See it as the number 0. It’s not nothing. It implies it is 1 or -1 or something in between. But it still is a zero.
Correction; It implies it isn’t 1 or -1
Our mistake continues to be thinking that, because we can’t see it or measure it, it’s nothing.
I am fairly certain at this point, that the universe, and everything in it, including all of the people, are just imagined by me, and I am totally alone. What makes me so sure is that I can close my eyes, fall asleep, and all of this is gone, and I can create any universe I want during this time. Explain that away, if you can.
I can assure you this is not the case.
@@rexreynolds9203I know. My point is, that we create alternate realities in the mind, and some people don't know the difference between imagined and real.
Yes, it's either mental illness, or an overactive imagination. Get help.
Protagonist syndrome
What people don't grasp is When they say "big bang" that does not mean a fiery explosion, it means a very rapid expansion in space-time from a very tiny point, infinitely smaller than a pinhead. Many scientists have answered this subject many years ago and you can find a plethora of explanations from people who specialise in the subject of what basic elements are in that tiny pinhead.
If it's objective it ain't infinite.
Only ñothing at all can be infinite and here is the rub, an infinity of ñothing by its nature can give rise to a finity of possibilities.
The main problem with explaining the "beginning of physical reality" is the fact that the explanation requires using words and sentences. Words have specific meanings and sentences are necessarily incomplete requiring multiple sentences. Therefore, trying to explain this using words can imply that there is definite separation between ideas. Words like "The" vs. "A" implies that "the" is absolute and objective while "a" is relative and subjective. These subtle words create a lot of friction and disagreements that may not be real.
A metaphysical explanation of "The Big Bang" would be that "before the Big Bang", what exists (always exists) is just "energy". By "energy", I mean that which defines existence itself. I am not referring to the term used in physics. "Energy" could also be called "consciousness", which is also misinterpreted depending on the context it is used. "Consciousness" in this case is simply the awareness of existence and the ability to act. This ability to act is what is called "potential energy". "Kinetic energy" is what happens after an action, or the result of an action. So just based on "energy", you have 2 states that can be understood: "before" and "after", "cause" and "effect". This observed state of "energy" creates the perception that there is time. So questions such as "what was before" or "what is the cause" comes from observation. However, how are you observing these states? Shouldn't the ability to be aware be the true question asked, rather than what caused something? The other issue is of the term "observation". "To observe" is not an optical action. It is the ability to be aware in a specific way. When one physically observes something, they become aware of a specific state. But this is also done without visual representations. One can become aware of any type of information. This ability to be aware of something is what exists as "energy".
Going back to the idea of "Big Bang", what is observed, or the "energy" that always exists, can be seen as parts within the whole no matter how small you go. Those parts are acting independently within the "singularity" energy of the whole. This differentiation of the whole into parts creates the concept of action. If the whole acted, it would not change because it remains the whole. But if the parts acted, then each part is acting independently of the other parts and the awareness of the whole changes. Thus, you have difference. This difference within the whole can be observed by what each individual part does and becomes. Again, this "observing" must occur somehow. If there is only "energy", then this "energy" must be the observer, and it is observing itself. Since there is only "energy", there is only "itself", and what "it" observes, is the parts of "itself". What each part does "creates" something new because the creation is change or "transforming" (in reality, it is becoming aware of something it was not aware of before). These parts can be considered the "particles" of physical reality. Those particles that came together to form larger particles is simply each part interacting and cooperating with other parts. These new parts are the result of cooperation between parts. From a metaphysical perspective, this is likened to growing in awareness or "consciousness". This growing of consciousness happens because something new is experienced. Having been a single part, now becoming a larger part is an experience of the individual parts. It was not, but now it is, before and after, cause and effect.
All questions about matter and the observed form is merely a way to represent the parts. The more parts that cooperate to form a larger part changes the awareness of itself relative to the other parts. Transformation does not mean energy is ever lost or degraded except as the physically observed form of energy (heat, electromagnetic signatures, etc). You cannot see the true "energy" since it is what's doing the observing.
The physically observed representation of energy implies linear time by the way change is represented. The visual representations create the perception of a continuous sequence, but what if the sequence isn't one change to another change, and instead is one state to another state, both states already existing in potential? The act of observing that state would "actualize" it into reality. So what changed isn't the whole or the parts as if they are physical things. Instead, the awareness changed and depending on what point of view you're talking about, it will appear as before and after. You can call this point of view as dimensions or levels of awareness. There are many new-age concepts that discuss this (this is not saying "new-age" information is infallable), but the general point is that the closer you get to the perspective from the whole "energy", the less you are aware of change since "everything" must include everything that can exist, and thus there cannot be anything that has not existed except through a lack of awareness. This is how "everything" can experience being "everything", by being the parts that represents every thing. But from the perspective of each thing, it cannot know every thing, thus the lack of awareness allows the "whole" to experience itself by experiencing itself from the point of view of each part.
The "creator" concept, or "God", is no different to the singularity concept of the "Big Bang", except as people attribute a personality to the concept. "God" in religious terms has become "energy" personified because of the religious teachings, not because it is that way. The single undifferentiated "creator" is the whole energy that is existence itself, but there is no human point of view for "God" except from the parts within. Creation is not limited to just one perspective or experience. Therefore, infinite potential cannot be represented by any single personification because that would be creating "God" in the image of man. The idea that man is in the image of "God" is that humans have awareness and potential, just as every thing else in existence. The part of the whole that is also aware, can create as well, not in visual terms, but from its actions that can change the awareness of itself. Removing the personification, which is because of the lack of awareness, means there is no such thing as "creation". Rather, everything is an experience of becoming aware.
What is amazing is that aside from Lawrence Krause explanation of nothing, no one in astrophysics or physics claims the universe came from nothing so your argument is stopped at the starting line.
I am pleased to have gotten so many comments to my statements about how and why. When I was going to college and studying physics I kept wondering about the same questions. I got my masters degree in physics and then a doctor of law and still could not find an answer. Einstein once said " God doesn't play dice with the universe" questioning Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. He spent much of his life trying to find a unified field theory but never succeeded and it is his 2 math theories on which all of modern physics is based. In the 1930s there was another good physicist, I can't remember his name at the moment and am to lazy at the moment to look it up, who was also a friend of Einstein and he wanted to know what was the foundation on which math and physics rested. That has actually nothing to do with the question of whether God, whatever that means, but actually is a scientific inquiry about whether there is something on which all of the laws of physics rest. You can either blindly just say what these laws are or you can ask his question about whether there is a foundation which actually also exists under these laws. Quantum mechanics actually is also based on mathematics as is all of modern science, but even math is based on basic assumptions without any explanation of why its rules work. I admit that even at my present age of 80 I still have no answer in my own mind. I am still in love with physics and have followed it most of my life. I was an ashiest in my teens and 20s, but as I got older became less certain about whether or not there is any meaning to life and wound up an agnostic admitting to myself that I just do not know whether there is or is not a creative force behind everything, but I keep studying and trying to find an answer that I can accept. I suggest that you all need to keep an open mind to the question of why because it is actually a major issue in physics today being considered by many physicists.
Mathematics, which I love, is simplified language by way of numbers and values. E=mc2 is a lot more than those if in an actual math problem and definitely more if made into a sentence. Mathematics which are symbols, based off hypothetical values we can’t truly measure, involving things we have never and will never see, experience or measure probably/ possibly.
The universe is binary. At it's core, everything is made of positives and negatives. Even the tiniest particle we can detect, is made up of something smaller. Small enough, I imagine, to be undetectable by any means. Imagine a quark has millions of parts to it, every one is made up of clusters of positives and negatives. The clue to everything is found within a magnetic field. Imagine the sensation of a solid object being created by nothing but energy. I'm telling you now, that matter is not real. It is a sensation, for lack of a better word.
@@ThisThing435a scientific theory must be able to make successful predictions. Something having a hypothetical value. Does in no way diminish it's value. An hypothesis is not just a wild guess.
@@timhallas4275currently in physics the Planck length is the smallest we can go. I'm sending you a link that explains why that is believed to be the case.
It also opens up another can of worms. The simulation theory. In base reality. There shouldn't be a limit to something being made up of something. But physics tells us that the Planck length is the limit. Which would make sense in a simulated reality.
@@rationald6799Simulated reality is an oxymoron.
Have you done something with the sound ? It has distortions when he talks its some kind of a noise is there a version witch cleaner audio without those distortions
Our minds cannot comprehend the fact the the universe is endless and alot more to it than what we know.
I disagree. Depends on the person.
Or that it's finite and there is no way to explain or comprehend no space outside of what is...
@eyeq7730 yes I can't imagine a limited universe. What is outside it I would ask. Also impossible to understand infinity. Both are equally impossible to understand
i can comprehend the fact that we know nothing of what everything is and we will probably never know. maybe we get answers when we die?
@@MrElias1998 lol, probably more questions honestly...
The cosmos was created by an eternal God...and He created an infinite universe.
Life process in our stomach is likely similar in life process inside infinite Space,in tree,in creature,inside soil,under water etc
The Big Bang doesn't say the universe came from nothing. It says everything that exists was densely compacted into a tiny space know as a singularity. Your thumbnail is misleading.
It's bullshit~
All things have neither beginning nor end. What exists today is the result of the movement and change of all things. This process goes on continuously and forever...
Nothing from nothing leaves nothing.
If we embrace the idea of the Big Bang, we find ourselves contemplating the nature of time itself. Might time be an unending river, flowing both backward and forward without constraints? Does the universe's timeline extend infinitely, inviting us to traverse its currents in exploration of the past and the future?
I believe time flows in infinite directions
@@danielhone9910
I believe our senses have evolved to help us determine our surroundings, not that they are arbitrary, this includes our sense of time. For me, time is a mechanism of the observable universe and beyond, but it is much more complex and dynamic than we can currently perceive.
I believe there are parallel universes with differing arrows of time, and these universes interact with ours gravitationally; dark matter is the gravitational effect of matter in temporally adjacent universes and dark energy is the effect of matter in relatively temporally inverse universes. I believe that blackholes are portals that pair with whiteholes in these parallel universes, and the Big Bang was one such white hole. The "beginning" of our universe will have been the "end" of at least one of the temporally inverse universes.
@@danielhone9910 Well, with my proposed cosmological model, there is no beginning. It's a branching cycle; our "universe" came from a white hole and will eventually be eaten by blackholes, and some of those black holes lead to big bangs in branching timelines and some to big bangs in a looping timeline that "ends" with the blackhole that caused our big bang. I reckon a lot of the branches operate similarly and loop back on themselves, while some may loop back to our big bang, and some may extend infinitely without "destruction." As for before the big bang initiated and after the final blackhole collapses in our observable space-time, I reckon there were other branching cycles, unless space-time itself is thoroughly propelled and swallowed by these connecting singularities.
@@danielhone9910
Yet I am spiritual, and I believe such a universe was a choice we made as spirit. I think function comes before form. We were a floating consciousness or "source" or "God" or whatever, and we chose to entertain ourself by splitting into infinite lives throughout infinite times and spaces, interconnected through the thought-form of all that is, what we are. We made this playground in an instant, a creation that was never created, a blip of an experience in a world without end.
@@danielhone9910
Thank you :)
The part about us being a floating consciousness that chose creation is just intuitive to me and cannot be proven so it doesn't belong anywhere near scientific research, the cosmological model part is also intuitive to me and it baffles me that noone seems to be researching it, maybe they'll catch up, maybe I'm crazy lol
I will say No, because the question of "how the universe was created" is a bit like the Turing test for AI: every time the problem is solved it gets redefined.
Suppose that science someday nails down all the phenomenological details of the Big Bang to everyone's satisfaction; the question then becomes, "Are/were there other universes?" (This is already an active topic!)
If that question is answered, "Yes, there is a Multiverse in which our universe is just one instance!" then the question becomes, "How did the Multiverse come into being?"
Then suppose we someday find the answer to that question. There's certain to be an even more ambitious question one can ask about How/Why/Who?
It's Turtles all the way down
Indeed, turtles all the way down. Turtles within turtles within turtles. Now that's my kind of reality.
could another universe collapsing cause the big bang? i mean the energy had to have come from somewhere. i don’t know how something that big could collapse on itself or what could cause it. i remember seeing something about it but i wonder how other people who know more think about it.
I always wondered that if God created the universe from nothing, then where did God come from? If the universe is finite, then what’s on the other side?
It seems more logical that "big bangs" are common and that there was not A (unique) big bang. In fact, big bangs could be a lot more common than super nova occurring in "our" universe. Imagine a giant bottle of cola (space) and each bubble (universe) that forms is from another "big bang". Any intelligence that forms inside that bubble(universe) deduces that they are the only universe as they can never detect any other bubble.
It's something that I already told. Nice to meet you brother of ideas.
Yup!!! I'm right there with you guys! I've been lumped in with Flat Earthers until now! Hahaha!
I have never heard somebody struggle so hard with the word, epoch.
Ever wondered where all that material goes that black holes gobble up, the billions of planets stars and asteroids that get absorbed over billions of years, well it has to somewhere! perhaps it finally explodes creating a new universe in a different dimension.
Black holes aren't empty spaces. They are dense beyond imagination.
That material is what makes up the black hole. Black holes are just very dense balls of matter, to which the sucked up matter is added. It's only a 'hole' in the sense that, since no light can escape, they seem like a dark area in the sky, only visible through the high energy activity that goes on near it's event horizon.
The universe never had a beginning , it always has been there
So then it would never end? There can’t be one without the other. Over trillions of years black holes will swallow everything. Over another trillion years through radiation decay particles will be gone and it will be a completely cold empty universe.
Exactly how I feel about it
Who said the universe "came from nothing"? No scientist, ever. Just creationists.
I'm going with Theory 4 . Every time I see one of those life after death stories they mostly say "They took me and shown me other worlds or parts of this world." Then they put them back on earth to live longer with these crazy thoughts. That's what a kid in his/her basement would do to punk people on their planet.
I go with theory 3, infinite multiverses. I have had intimations of this possibility, even of subtle changes within the reality such as we know it. The situation we are dealing with may also be being affected by the machinations at the Large Hadron Collider, down to and including newly defined and discovered quarks.
@@Geoplanetjane your comment about the large hadron collider indicates your lack of understanding of what they do there. They are recreating interactions that already occur constantly in our universe, just in a way where we can observe them. Believing that the "machination" of CERN's work causing structural changes in our universe is like believing that a black hole may form because you put electricity in a light bulb.
@@Geoplanetjaneyou have had nothing, lay of the drugs
Don't need a why.😊
OUTSTANDING documentary!!!!
Which ever theory you consider, non of them explain why anything exists at all. By this I mean that theories all assume that some thing has always existed from which space and time operate but the real question is whether they have always existed for infinity. In the end it will all eventually come down to the question of not why any form of reality exists and instead it comes down to the issue of whether there is a beginning or there never was a beginning and that may be unanswerable no matter how much progress we make in physics.
th-cam.com/video/Or7pwR60ilE/w-d-xo.htmlsi=ZJ6DKDB1CaIm-T3_
Space has no requirements. Including a beginning or a limit to its size.
It's beyond bizarre to think of a beginning and an end... The Big Bang probably was the beginning for us... But then scientist say both the Universe is expanding (even beyond light speed) and will - ultimately - collapse in itself again...
And that - for me - sounds plausible, one big black hole that contains the entire universe, unable to contain itself and turns into one big white hole and that process repeating itself over and over again, infinitely... But because of whatever happens in a black hole, doesn't exclude a multiverse; instead this process would imo make it far more likely for those to exists...
In the vastness of infinity nothing or something is essentially the same thing. There's no reason to assume nothing should be the default state because you're applying our logical understanding of time and space when the properties of the vast state beyond our perspective could be completely inconceivable and something could have just always existed.
Light is God...that's your answer...Light is DNA. God said let there be light...there is no riddle...you can't see God.
"Where is it written in adamantine that semi-carnivorous monkeys can or should be capable of understanding reality? That seems to be one of the first delusions, and one of the more prideful illusions of human culture, that a final understanding is possible in the first place." Terence McKenna
Lol no. This is also complete garbage. Pretending like it will never be understood because humans are monkeys (which is also bullcrap) is tarded. Terrence McKenna is a bullshitting edgelord.
another delusion is that these same monkeys cause or prevent climate change!
could this Universe be a new Universe pushed out from older 1?
Pushed out of a full Black Hole
Tip for understanding this video; don’t watch the scene. If you try to make sense of the visuals you will find it hard to understand the audio
Great video, I love the way you ask the big, big questions but without asserting that science can provide the ultimate answers and leave room for doubt, even about the Big Bang itself. I don't believe science alone can provide the ultimate answers, the answers are probably bigger than the questions and to coin a phrase "passeth all understanding".
Where honest people say "I dont know" others choose the dishonest route of "God did it"
Because we say God did it. Doesn't make us liars or wrong. Because we truly do not know but I'd rather believe in something then nothing at all. And a God loving us is so bad? Like they say in the good book. Why is that such a bad thought or thing to believe?
@@JoshuaWilliams-dj2co So.."The Flying Spaghetti Monster did it" also fulfills your criteria.
I would prefer to know the truth than believe in your nothing (god).
A "loving god" would not have drowned humanity, would not torture people for eternity. Your god advocates for slavery.
And the bible is a horrendous read, it is hardly the "good book".
I think questions like why there is something rather than nothing is a fundamental question and it is simply beyond our human comprehension.
I believe consciousness is the foundation of all existence and therefore that's an easy question; the nothing was boring so we/God/spirit/source/whatever you wanna call it imagined an everything
I believe we exist on a facet of the multiverse interconnected through gravitational anomalies - the big bang was a white hole paired with a black hole(s) at the end of a parallel universe with an inverse timeflow and it's big bang is paired with a black hole(s) at the end of our universe. This explains dark energy as the gravitational effect of matter on the other side of the fabric of spacetime. Taking it a step further, different blackholes bend spacetime to different extents and dark matter is the gravitation from matter in parallel universes with timeflows similar to ours.
@@ThisIsTheIkeMaster Logical reasoning
Logical reasoning. I also believe that every person is a universe and everyone feels that they are the center of the world and everything else is around us. I think there is a connection between a person's emotions, thoughts and the results of modern physics.
Uau! Really good video!! 🙏🙏
The vacuum bubble idea is getting closer to the possible outcome of something out from nothing but to hold this negative pressure the universe needs a strong and robust "sphere" arround it self (not excluing other forms of containers) and it is hard to occur naturaly... but still, Nature overtakes its own limits!!
No evidence.
@@rogerphelps9939
Can you be more specific? What exactly has no evidence?
The vacuum bubble idea.@@pr_esponjadelik
No kidding! Nothing is still something!
Exactly
Nothing makes sense unless you calculate a creator into the calculations.
And who created the creator? The devil... 👹
@@thekingofmojacar5333Him.
A creator does not make any sense until you first explain the creator.
Somebody hit the RUN command. And here we are.
Very well done video. I have been interested in this things since shildhood, but still at62 its more and more fashinating for me. I have no degrees in psysics as a psycologist, and agnostic person. So i am still waiting for a video like this including the thougths of some kind of spiritual dimension, not yet discovered but maybe could explain more of these very complicated things. If there are some kind of dimensions with "spirits" that is not demanding a God, just a continue of Darwins evolution, that we dont need psycial bodies anymore, that could maybe?? be one more key to comming nearer the truth, but the whole truth is as i believe not possible for a very long time, or never??? Already at age 12 i start to think that something must exist, even emptyness is something like you say in the video with things sporadicly comes and then just disappapears! I live in sweden therefore my rather bad english. If i should guess, whice theory is right! I have no clue att al, but Einsteins famous " everything is realitive" is the king of al sayings. We are trapped in our dimension, but like radiowavawes "something" not found yet is surrounding us. Without our ability to notice it. Please do simular videoes and ad the spiritual things to the physics. Thanks for a very well done video 🥰
Even as a child I questioned the Big Bang theory. But how do they know??
Me too
Search engines are even easier to use than youtube
They don't and won't..equations are based off earth technology. Space is not a technology. But instructions like DNA...but they not gonna say that.
You could always get a graduate degree in quantum physics and then read all the scientific papers. All the evidence is open and public.
Not a scientist or astrophysicist- .........I don't always believe all the science-just a gut. @@Andre_XX
THE BIG BANG is/was a local occurance in our part of the universe.
Exactly, the super-massive black hole that is our universe decided to explode in this region thereby “creating” its own space/time bubble in which we exist today
I don't know anybody who thinks the universe came from nothing, and nor has that ever been taught to me ??
You need to study quantum physics at a graduate level. When you have done this, come back and tell us your opinion then.
@@Andre_XX - You think from a limited paradigm and an arrogant one - Look in the mirror and check your ego, then you can write something which may be taken seriously
@@sensi6457 Another Dunning-Kruger example here, folks.
Something cannot come out of nothing, except of course if there are various layers of reality, in which case it emerges from a another layer, one we cannot perceive. Regardless there are other theories that do address the holes in these theories, but science has blinded itself to their possibilities.
What theories are those?
Unfortunately something did come from sperm to egg to human.
"Something cannot come out of nothing" How sure are you of this? It is not something that can be experimentally verified. You see, we have no "nothing" so we can not test it to see what it can or can not do.
Nothing is a form of something, its just called nothing , but absokute nothing doesnt excist, because to excist, it has to be something, checkmate
@@SWOTHDRA You must have an IQ over 300.
I feel like "source: trust me bro" could be applied to every single video about the universe😂
At least they try, this is our understanding so far. Dont take it from us. You either come with a better explanation or go live like a plant.
There is no such thing as "Nothing". As fun as it is to speculate we will never know the answers to our big questions, at least not in our temporal existence.
Yup evwn nothing is something. It all becomes semantics and filosofy at that point. Doesnt mean space is complex, it just means our words are not sufficient to describe reality, so we need better language
I never believed in the big bang theory and believe the Universe is much older then what the big bang could have created. If you take a drop of water from the Pacific Ocean, that might begin to compare to how much we know about the Universe in comparison.
As far as humans are concerned, there has never been a "nothing". If there was, there would still be nothing.
How is probabilities engrained in the universe? It would have to specify a certain particle and an association of this particle with a wave function. The "associate with" relation can't be expressed by a number.
The multiverse began with a big bang duoverse. You brand yourself as a low consciousness numpty dumpty by clinging to the materialistic tomfoolery of a single universe
The Big Bang doesn't say the Universe comes from nothing. It is about the expansion of an already existing singularity, not nothing
The Big Bang doesn’t say something came from nothing. It states that the universe was in an incredibly hot and dense state and 13.7 billion years ago it began to expand. It makes no claims about what came before the expansion. Maybe before you post a video you should learn about your subject matter.
Multi verse is funny, we still don't know what a universe is.
The notion of infinity , and the older one- of eternity, features. Old beliefs morph into the obvious. The metals and chemicals in our earthly space can be wrought in a number of remarkable ways. {How else could I be talking to you right now!} There seems to be a purpose and a rationale for existence.
conceptually i like the idea that the cold empty universe is somehow equivalent to a hot dense one and find it not just intellectually elegant but also comforting; regards determinism and probabilism i'm not sure what the conflict is supposed to be; consider a radioactive nucleus, say 238-U, statistically we know what fraction of them will decay over a period of time, (roughly half will decay in 4.5 billion year period, which is the approximate age of the Earth) but if we keep inspecting one single 238-U atom we have no idea when it will decay; so at sub-atomic level everything is probabilistic; but when we look at the motion of atoms and molecules they appear well described by collision/ interaction with other molecules whose position and momenta are well above the Planck limit; finally when we reach the large scale macroscopic objects their behavior appears fully determined - we can absolutely know that andromeda and the milky way will 'collide' in around another 4.5 billion years - i bet the 238-U atoms can hardly wait!
We're just sitting in an arcade on an alien planet hooked up to a game called Roy!
Why do you insert background music? And it is so loud it interfere with the main program.
It is so unnecessary and also disturbing.
If I wanted to listen to a complete ration of bullschitt... I would go find a Biden Speech !
1. There are 2 parameters (at least) that exist eternally: space and time. We are used to thinking of these terms as measurable and existing only from the moment the universe was created. This is a total mistake. The existence of space and time, measurable or not, are a fait accompli. 2. We are only able to sense things in 4 dimensions only. Today there is no longer any scientific doubt and everyone agrees that other dimensions exist. It is most likely that at least some of these dimensions belong to formats before the Big Bang and perhaps also to the very distant future of the universe. What I mean by the big bang was "interdimensional conversion". 3. Today we are just beginning to deal with the significance of the existence of dark matter that does not connect with visible matter and dark energy that acts as the opposite of gravity. Whether dark matter goes through transformations of becoming dark energy is a question that is still open. The same also applies to the question of whether there are interactions between black holes and dark matter and dark energy. 4. In my opinion there should be another parameter in interdimensional space and I would call it "interdimensional consciousness". This is what they mean by giving explanations through quantum physics (still without success because Our lack of senses for something beyond the physics of the 4 dimensions. 5. In the human brain there are many cells that do not know what their function is. In my opinion, this is a future developmental reserve that has the possibility of developing pleas that will help break through the 4 dimensions. All this, provided that humanity does not destroy itself before It's for delusional reasons and will go in the direction of "conscious emancipation".
I'm still trying to figure out which came first...the chicken or the egg.
Is nothing something we mistake for nothing?
No! Nothing is not a thing. There is no mistake. Your confusion is the results of indoctrination. Indoctrinated, assimilated education. Read more nonfiction. Dictionary. Encyclopedia. Study linguistics. Stop embarrassing yourself. In these comments. With your personal riddles. We can hear your mental illness. Embarrassing!
Nothing is the absence of something, so either way, we get a universe. Erroneous math does not equal erroneous theories.
Big Bang doesn't SAY the Universe came from nothing. This is classic Creationist strawman argument.
Big Bang says that all the energy that makes up the Universe was compressed into a tiny singularity which expanded, and is still expanding. There is nothing in Big Bang about where that energy came from.
"Before the beginning" is a meaningless phrase. Time & space came into being WITH the big Bang. There is no such thing as "before time" Whether the Big Bang was a one-off or a repeated Big Bounce, there is no "before the Big Bang"
What has a first man or woman got to do with Big Bang? There were certainly no humans at the time of the Big Bang. There weren't even atoms at that stage, let alone life.
hydrogen is the simplest element of only 1 atom.
We can never know why the universe exists. We can discover how things work within the universe but never why it exists.
Our instruments can never detect the very big (multiverse) or the very small (quantum mechanics).
I personally believe it was an anti-matter black hole that burst, like stars burst into a supernova. The anti-matter black hole became a white matter new universe. When the weight of the anti-matter = the weight of the matter, then the weight is nothing (singularity), for a tiny fraction of a second.
"WHAT WAS THERE BEFORE THE BEGINNING?" THATS A FLAWED QUESTIONING.
The Universe Multiverse: is Omnipresent, Omnipotent, Omniscient, and just is.
It has always been and always will be, but we will not.
We always try and look and search for answers to our basic of questions… but we CANNOT perceive the unfathomable.
Spot on
Wonderful explanation! Hope that the answer to the merger of the concepts come sooner than later. Some of the philosophical explanations are also available in ancient Vedas and Upanishads
Even if we are in a cyclical universe, there STILL has to be one that started it all off - where did this first universe come from???????
The simple truth....we actually do not know what we are talking about!!!!
Seems true;because the Holy Qur'aan also mentions that there was Allah (God) and enormous amount of water upon which His Throne was laid. Also, the authentic Hadis(saying of Prophet Muhammad,peace be upon him) also mentions that everything is made out of water.So ,it could be that water was split and hydrogen and other elements were created afterwards , by Allah alone.
Interesting. Does the Qur'aan State all the Heavens and the Earth were created in 7 days and 7 nights. I ask because in studying Nature, most Animal Species on Earth love their brothers and sisters unconditionally. There are rare unnatural exceptions to this, such as Lions killing the children of other Lions. The same with Polar Bears?
"hey nothing, what'cha doin'?"
"oh, nothing much. just figured i would turn myself into a universe today. can i borrow a spark?"
"well, i would let you borrow a spark, but a spark is something, and science says that the universe was created from nothing, remember?"
relative potential difference is everything. -1 ~ 0 ~ +1
In the "Tipitaka" The book of Buddhism...Lord Buddha said (more than 2,600 years ago) " The universe is infinite, boundless, no limit , no beginning, no ending. " {{ Lord Buddha said 4 things that are infinite, boundless, no limit , no beginning, no ending...(1) The Universe, (2) Samsara(realms of existence), (3) Living Beings, (4) Nirvana.}}
If we see galaxies in every direction and the expansion is at light speed.. the light from directly 180 degrees would never get to us unless expansion stops and the vacuume causes a direct reversal of travel... so are we expanding or contracting?
After 22 minutes and 30 seconds of listening to the word theory I couldn't handle it anymore. For those who have ears to hear the universe was spoken into existence. And for those who refuse to hear you will find out for real how it took place but not while you're alive!
I like illustration at 17: 30.
I can visualize the universe accelerating so fast that it goes into orbit around itself.
And where does all that Casimir energy come from, I wonder.
What spits outs particles and sucks them back in. Like a pot of water preparing to boil.?
Where did all that energy come from?
background audion name please?
?
/
/
?
You better try to tell us how it got its start.... I'm pretty sure it's way beyond our understanding
The more I learn about the universe, the more I suspect that every claim or theory about it is mere speculation and guesswork. No one knows precisely what the universe is; it remains a secret that eludes all attempts to unravel it
I don't see why expansion means it all has to contract, perhaps there is alot more out there we cannot see , and all it takes is enough to come together to reach some as of yet undetermined threshold, which then would trigger another " big bang "
I guess my point is I see no reason it ALL had to come from one event.
Makes no sense to me.
They say expand because they believe a red object is something moving away from us rather than simply seeing it as a frequency like the electric universe theory does. Their "big bang" is bs and they're willing to go so far beyond realistic in order to convince the rest of us to believe their fantasies. Notice how this propaganda video told us of all these theories yet left out the electric/plasma universe theory entirely? Not one mention of the cosmic web the galaxies are created from in much the same way a flower grows from a stem of a bush, plant, or tree, as well as in much the same way we are created within our mothers' wombs and attached to the umbilical cord. The umbilical cord between the cosmic web and galaxies as better known as magnetic portal connection and feeds the galaxies plasma material and energy in much the same as our moms' umbilical cord(s) fed us.
Trust your instincts. It doesn't make any sense to you because you can feel it, meaning you can think for yourself rather than allow yourself to be programmed.
The real answer is not that the universe emerged from nothing. We have simply reached the limits of our current knowledge. And that’s okay, maybe one day we’ll figure it out. It is possible that there is no such thing as nothing and that something has always existed from which our universe emerged. Despite all the conjecture, our most scientific answer is we do not yet know.
The idea the universe is a simulation holds more ground when you realize large gravitational masses cause a slowing of time, the same would happen in a computer simulation. The more things you are loading into an area the slower the processing works.
That would assume the computer running obeys the same laws and confines presented within the simulation.
Processing time remains constant, so it would impact the simulation as a whole, as information to process increases - not just areas where there is a concentration of information. It's entirely possible this is a simulation, but time dilation doesn't really point to that in itself
Nothing doesn't exist and will never be
We are in a project box.
Before the Big Bang was the quantum field of probability. The moment the “big bang” happened, a probability was calculated.
This has got to be the most word salad video I have ever watched on TH-cam.