I Sunk A Battle With A 2-Inch Gun - Ultimate Admiral Dreadnoughts

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 40

  • @totallyreallogic6886
    @totallyreallogic6886 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +59

    Love your videos but please don't fix the the video name. Please let it just say you killed a battle with a 2inch gun

    • @Stealth17Gaming
      @Stealth17Gaming  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      Lol ok

    • @obeliks_potowski
      @obeliks_potowski 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      It kinda feels ai generated

    • @Stealth17Gaming
      @Stealth17Gaming  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@obeliks_potowski It isn't

    • @HossBlacksilver
      @HossBlacksilver 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      Makes me think about an UAD title Stealth had a few years back about "Hot Twenty Inch Singles in Your Area"

  • @artyomgunard4491
    @artyomgunard4491 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    It's not about the size.... It's about the accuracy and the load.

    • @chaosengine4597
      @chaosengine4597 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      that's what she said?

    • @BarackLesnar
      @BarackLesnar 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      My gun is only 2 inches but I have 30 of them and I can shoot each one 20 times per minute

  • @Vector-ht6zq
    @Vector-ht6zq 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

    I told you 2inchs were fine

    • @Stealth17Gaming
      @Stealth17Gaming  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

      Did you tell her too?

    • @Vector-ht6zq
      @Vector-ht6zq 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      @@Stealth17Gaming No , I showed her

    • @goblinslayer734
      @goblinslayer734 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@Stealth17Gaming💀 nah im weezing 🤣🤣

  • @QuintonMurdock
    @QuintonMurdock 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    That magnesium armor was a mistake

  • @Ellerion2
    @Ellerion2 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I'd make the two inchers 2.9 inchers with max barrel length and the mains an inch smaller for faster reload but with max length of the barrels. I'd say that would decrease the weight a bit. However, this was with the hind-sight knowledge you did not have about the "PowderKeg" class enemies with no armor...

  • @harjutapa
    @harjutapa 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I'd say 9 inch mains along with a ton of 2 inch secondaries for this challenge. Lets you save on armor weight a bit, and since you know they have absolutely no armor, reload time is vastly more important than armor pen.

  • @swiftdraw
    @swiftdraw 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I encountered the Advanced Small Battleship in my China play through. It's a strange ship. Only advantage it really has over a battlecruiser hull of the same era is it can mount more armor and that's about it.
    So, assuming I was going into the match with no knowledge of the enemies utter lack of armor, I probably would have done the same with the hull as you did, but mounted 11in to 12in guns as primaries and 3 to 4in guns as secondary. Maybe something like a 3.7in. Against 1900 ships, Mk IV or V with standard AP shells would still penetrate pretty easy as they might be on Krupp I, or perhaps II at the very most. There is a chance they might even still have Harvey armor. The 1940 3in and 4in would, even against a standard armor ship, would pen most areas that weren't the main belt if they had a favorable angle. All this allows for a lighter, cheaper ship with an increase in fire rate to offset the loss of pure damage. The 11-12in guns would still cause enough flooding against 1900 damage control that the enemy would go down quick enough.
    If I were chasing cost as well, I'd go Krupp V as Modern Armor is hilariously expensive and Krupp V is light enough. And since I am not too concerned about 1900 ship hitting mine at range reliably, I'd probably go with standard bulkheads, Reinforced Bulkheads I, and no torpedo blister instead. Which, I realize, goes against how you usually run, but every competition advantage would be critical to me.

  • @Hellfire8
    @Hellfire8 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    It's not the size that matters, it's the armour protecting the vulnerable spot :O

  • @pixy7167
    @pixy7167 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    "it's not about winning, it's about sending a turret" - Target pratice Captain, 194x

  • @cesarespinozaspain
    @cesarespinozaspain 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I think you won the Popcorn challenge.
    Achievement unlocked Pop goes the turret

  • @ahmedisonthego
    @ahmedisonthego 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    2 inchers broke records of even 20 inchers

  • @thefool4492
    @thefool4492 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    The thing i want to know is which of your guns were credited with more damage? The 2" or the 15"? I bet it was pretty close

  • @jamescousins9216
    @jamescousins9216 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    With how many turrets got tossed, we sure this isn't the Fourth Pacific Squadron?/jk

  • @TimSmith-vl4qk
    @TimSmith-vl4qk 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    a Stealth battleship yamato

  • @RayHardman7567
    @RayHardman7567 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Would've went with the extended barrel and caliber 9in mk5. Saves weight, but punches above it's class. One or two of them, then the rest is secondary. If I could, I'd go the 7 or 8in route, but 5in is good. Extended barrel and increased diameter.

  • @LeroxYT
    @LeroxYT 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Here before the title changes (optional)

  • @Basti0n
    @Basti0n 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Question for you stealth, why do you always run with stereoscopic rangefinders? Personally I prefer coinc so i get the base accuracy bonus, as I find that long range accuracy bonus dosent do much for me

    • @Stealth17Gaming
      @Stealth17Gaming  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I think the difference in long range starts at 10+ km. Since this battle was 20 km start I wanted the longer range bonus.

  • @MrJay_White
    @MrJay_White 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    china warship design going strong in this scenario.

  • @hanhnguyenluu75
    @hanhnguyenluu75 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Wdym "I sunk a battle"?

    • @CompetitiveRacist54
      @CompetitiveRacist54 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      He sunk the entire battle, all hands were lost; even the skirmishes and engagements didn't survive.

    • @hanhnguyenluu75
      @hanhnguyenluu75 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@CompetitiveRacist54 what's with your name?

    • @LeroxYT
      @LeroxYT 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@CompetitiveRacist54 eyy Instagram competitive racist too?

    • @Stealth17Gaming
      @Stealth17Gaming  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Yes. A battle. Any questions?

  • @RavenWolffe77
    @RavenWolffe77 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What if you could *only* use 2in guns? Just cover every inch of deck space with Bofors cannons.
    Light the sky on fire, turn the air to solid lead, shred everything on the enemy deck to atoms.
    All hail the USS Brrrrrt

    • @CurtisRooney
      @CurtisRooney 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Still not enough dakka, but dat be an Orky shoota!

  • @TheCaptainbeefylog
    @TheCaptainbeefylog 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    4x2 14" with a mix of 4" and 2" secondaries?

  • @Sulu-s_Apocalypse
    @Sulu-s_Apocalypse 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    why do you keep calling SEPs "semi-ballistic"?
    Semi- armour piercing is a design of shell sitting between high explosive and aromour piercing with explosive filler, for it has more explosive compound, than regular APHE, but thinner walls, which reduces it's penning capabilities - therefore the fuses need to be set differently; it has nothing to do with ballistic caps, installed to reduce the drag mid-flight and increase the range of shell

    • @Stealth17Gaming
      @Stealth17Gaming  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Don't know where it came from. You're right. It makes no sense.