What is I3C®?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 19

  • @jacobusburger
    @jacobusburger 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Microchip out here dropping news on I2C’s sequel like we wouldn’t notice.
    I’m excited to try I3C out!

  • @Studyelectron
    @Studyelectron 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Design marvel in electronic spheres 👍

  • @portblock
    @portblock ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Seam like too much of a squeezing in more features to only have something slightly better. I believe (I could be wrong) I2C was for inter board coms. To me, if my application/design needs more speed then SPI or UART, If I need to go off board then CAN or Ethernet

    • @john_hind
      @john_hind ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I2C is supposed to be written and pronounced I-squared-C or IIC which stands for Inter-Integrated-Circuit. So it is supposed to be intra-, not inter- board, i.e. between chips on the same board. Not sure if anyone has contrived a rationale for I3C yet though! The address assignment looks like a killer feature since at the moment you have to hope that two ICs will not have the same default addresses or else IC pins have to be reserved for selecting amongst a limited number of alternative addresses.

    • @portblock
      @portblock ปีที่แล้ว

      @@john_hind Thank you for the correction, i get intra and inter mixed up all the time, but yes, I agree with what you say

  • @jrstf
    @jrstf หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I feel I learned very little. For instance, apparently arbitration is done at low speed, though that wasn't explicitly stated, then it would seem the only speed benefit would be for long packets.

    • @MicrochipTechnology
      @MicrochipTechnology  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks for your feedback! You’re right-arbitration in I3C does happen at lower speeds, which helps manage longer data packets more efficiently. If you have more questions or need further details, feel free to reach out or check out our additional resources. We’re here to help.

  • @Rob_III
    @Rob_III ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This sounds an awful lot as a solution looking for a problem? If I²C doesn't cut it, I'd go for CAN, USB or Ethernet... I'm having a hard time placing I³C in this picture, especially when device support is pretty non-existent at the moment and established alternatives are available aplenty.

  • @pete3897
    @pete3897 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    So I2C is written I2C but prounounced Eye Squared See, whereas I3C is written I3C and pronounced Eye Three See not Eye Cubed See?! Totally makey sensey

    • @AlexKarasev
      @AlexKarasev หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's very cool, baby, but that's nothing. I4C will be pronounced Dorsia

  • @stevehageman6785
    @stevehageman6785 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Always check the Hardware Errata.
    PIC18-Q20 Family,
    * I2C = 8 Hardware issues
    * I3C = 22 Hardware issues

  • @MichaelKingsfordGray
    @MichaelKingsfordGray ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Morphing into CAN bus?

    • @0LoneTech
      @0LoneTech ปีที่แล้ว

      Pretty much, but primarily pretending SMBus (with e.g. host notify and address resolution) doesn't exist.

  • @axramar1992
    @axramar1992 ปีที่แล้ว

    which mcu supports this protocol?✅️

    • @MayankPrasad
      @MayankPrasad ปีที่แล้ว

      I found this link in the description:
      PIC18-Q20 Family of Microcontrollers: mchp.us/3SixeMG

    • @MicrochipTechnology
      @MicrochipTechnology  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Hi there, thanks for reaching out! That would be the PIC18-Q20 Product Family, as Max noted previously. These MCUs are equipped with I3C® modules. The link he sent is perfect: www.microchip.com/en-us/products/microcontrollers-and-microprocessors/8-bit-mcus/pic-mcus/pic18-q20

  • @oPossum5150
    @oPossum5150 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Eye Cubed See

  • @jensschroder8214
    @jensschroder8214 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    then I can connect it to the I2C bus, fine

  • @mariafigueroa8408
    @mariafigueroa8408 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Por.favor en español mo entiendo idioma