@@SamGarcia it's called "socialism with Chinese characteristics" and it is not even remotely close to communism. to achieve communisim, first you have to liberate all of humanity, then eradicate social class differences, and then you will not need a state and its muscles because there's no class struggle to keep at bay at all. then, you got communism. ignorant western capitalist brats don't even know what communism is and call all competitor countries communist states. hilarious.
3535*1212 = 3000 * 1212 + 500 * 1212 + 30 * 1212 + 5*1212 = 3636000 + 606000 + 36360 + 6060 = 4284420 would be easier if you could write it down properly, but youtube doesn't use a monospace font. Still could do it in less than 30 seconds.
Why needlessly overcomplicate it when you simplify it to basic addition? 3535 * 1212 = e ^ ln(3535) * e ^ ln(1212) = e ^ ( ln(3535) + ln(1212) ) And then you just ask ChatGPT to solve the logs and exp cause that's what kids do these days, amirite?
Einstein in Santa costume: (sets down bag of gifts and starts to reach inside it) "Commander, I have something very interesting to show you." Einstein pulls out... _____________[complete the sentence]!
@@miguelafonso6375 Let me explain: 1: It breaks down the multiplication in simpler steps which is a good thing to learn how to do on easy problems before you get more complicated ones. 2: It avoids doing multiplication and addition at the same time (eg 2*3+1) 3: There is less risk doing it wrong. One major problem with the method on the right is if you forget to move the digits one position to the left for the second row. 4: There's a rectangular structure to the numbers which can be easier to follow than just writing the numbers (this of course does not apply to all students) 5: Area of rectangles is less abstract than pure numbers 6: It can give a deeper understanding of what multiplication is, and is also very similar to a method for solving quadratic equations. The purpose of mathematics teaching in school is not for students to become calculators, but to learn. It is not how quickly you solve a task that matters, but what you learned from it.
"Hello, where is nearest grocery store?" "Oh, just go straight and turn right" Her: "First, you need to get sense of direction, if you go in the morning then Sun is at the east that means we are now facing at the west, after you discover where you at, then you need to head west and looking an intersection, at intersection you need to headed north, you may keep a steady pace and the grocery store is a store that sells grocery items and it a one of a store that faced to the west"
Yes, one is a method to do it efficiently, the other is a thorough explanation for people who may or may not understand the underlying necessary context, like students in a classroom.
if i ask for directions and they start giving me that shit i will just immediately assume "oh they think i'm a moron" and then leave and just figure it out myself so I don't have to deal with the internal agony of waiting for someone to get to the fucking point and finally answer what I asked. If I need additional elaboration I will ask, and the fact that public schools are allowed to pack 30 kids in a classroom with one teacher so that teaching cannot be done properly is absolutely disgusting, because children do not have the social development mental capacity or legal ability to be able to tell off their shitty teacher for wasting precious minutes of the day, probably up to an entire fucking classroom period, on a single, simple, multiplication problem, and to be honest with the current state of the public education system I question whether their parents have the social development and mental capacity to do it either.
Yes, but a punnett square is easier to understand than going straight to foil because the graphical structure (the box) helps scaffold learning for students that might be confused without it.
We usually use the square for factoring trinomials in algebra, not basic number operations. The box makes more sense in algebra because you can't add two variables to make a simpler form.
the bigger problem in my opinion is that we are trying to make things "easier" by adding more steps, which works in the 3rd or 4th grade when they're just doing multiplication but will make even pre-algebra problems daunting because the way you've taught basic multiplication and division (god knows what they're teaching now for division) has now doubled the amount of steps they're going to do to solve just parts of main problem. physically drawing the square helps with visualization but also is a crutch that will discourage the slower or lazier students from practicing without it.
@@barrag3463 The steps are still there either way, you're just doing them in your head in the method that looks more efficient. Once the kids know what they're doing, this more elaborate method has already served its purpose. Although this is actually also a good way to conceptualize the process of multiplying algebraic expressions with each other.
The purpose of this common core method isn't for adults to do math quickly and efficiently. We have calculators and computers to do that. The other thing to keep in mind is that common core doesn't say to do any one method, but rather, to do several methods. This specific method is one of the for that curriculum writers figure would be a good way to do it. The goal is that students can get a better understanding of what's actually going on with the numbers when they learn them, so they're better prepared for more advanced maths like algebra (multiplying expressions works like this except you have variables instead of decimal places) and science (this method is basically a punnett square for example).
they just need to make it relative.. for example: if you have 30 conscripts and 12 are gunned down by G.Is for the glory of the Rodhina, how many Conscripts are remaining and how many will you get in return? :D if you answer "as many conscripts that the Map can handle" you deserve Star of Lenin
He solved the problem using contemporary solutions AND finished the mission with time to spare. It's funny, disrespectful and shows how pathetic these new fangled methods are. Brilliant.
The sad thing is it’s essentially the same thing just the common core way makes it more complicated than it needs to be. It’d be useful shown that way once and only once to show the underlying logic for students who care to know.
It's not exactly the same. Proper way: 35*12 = 35*(10+2) = ... Common Core: 35*12 = (30+5)*(10+2) = ... It may be easier if you are some sort of idiot robot but otherwise it's much worse.
Showing students the underlying logic is the point, as you gathered, but the thing is that students won't likely understand and internalize after only being shown once, and the purpose of public schools is to educate all the children, not just those who care to know. Of course, it's not the most efficient way, but students don't need to be efficient since in real life they'll have calculators, understanding is much more important. And this method helps tie in to future learning in more advanced maths like algebra (multiplying expressions works like this except you have variables instead of decimal places) and science (this method is basically a punnett square for example).
That has the be the LEAST EFFICIENT method of teaching I've seen in quite a long time. Woman, we're multiplying two numbers, NOT MAKING A BLOODY MATRIX
1: It breaks down the multiplication in simpler steps which is a good thing to learn how to do on easy problems before you get more complicated ones. 2: It avoids doing multiplication and addition at the same time (eg 2*3+1) 3: There is less risk doing it wrong. One major problem with the method on the right is if you forget to move the digits one position to the left for the second row. 4: There's a rectangular structure to the numbers which can be easier to follow than just writing the numbers (this of course does not apply to all students) 5: Area of rectangles is less abstract than pure numbers 6: It can give a deeper understanding of what multiplication is, and is also very similar to a method for solving quadratic equations. The purpose of mathematics teaching in school is not for students to become calculators, but to learn. It is not how quickly you solve a task that matters, but what you learned from it. Efficient learning and efficient solving are two different things.
The purpose of this common core method isn't for adults to do math quickly and efficiently. We have calculators and computers to do that. It's so that students can get a better understanding of what's actually going on with the numbers when they learn them, so they're better prepared for more advanced maths like algebra (multiplying expressions works like this except you have variables instead of decimal places) and science (this method is basically a punnett square for example).
"Superb commander" Zofia's voice lines are way better than that woman trying to teach multiplication in a roundabout way Is that how they're teaching right now? It's like they're trying tp recreate a shortcut method but is failing miserably. Also, great to know people are still playing RA2
Bruh, shes not even talking to kids, shes talking to the PARENTS of the kids so they can help them take light years to come to simple solutions, shes big braining
@@ReaVen443 They think kids get dumber as the days go by, instead of realizing kids simply are unmotivated and unhealthy That was a little too real tho so how bout that red dawn speedrun?
I understand what common core is trying to accomplish but it's basically "fast math as explained by people who cant do fast math to an audience that will be graded based on showing work."
Common core is for the kids who can't figure this out on their own. Teaching those kids separately is discrimination, so everyone else has to be held back until they catch up.
Common core shouldnt be a written, or even a teachable subject. It's something you pick up along the way, needing to simplify your mental process. You can 'teach' it as like a small tidbit info so that younglings dont rely on calculator or brute force mental calculations, but dont teach them like a regular subject. It's a mental gymnastic, you crawl before you start to run.
This is a good point, something I think about math is it depends a lot on having an epiphany and suddenly gaining comprehension of how it works, and encouraging those epiphanies isn't really how our pedagogy is set up. However, I do think common core when done correctly (remember, common core is a set of standards, not the curriculum built on those standards) is intended to help guide students towards those epiphanies.
I was shocked no one knows the left method is faster than the right one when digits getting larger. And ironically the method is called Karatsuba Multiplication and was invented by a soviet person.
It's a shame that the method on the left receives so much ridicule, as it is far easier for younger students to grasp the visual concepts of areas. Further, learning the area decomposition method is a stepping stone towards traditional long multiplication anyway, with the added benefit that it teaches students to focus on reducing the complexity of problems. As an engineer, I also appreciate that the area decomposition method has much closer ties to traditional geometric mathematics which also lays the groundwork for understanding more complex mathematical concepts like completing the square for quadratic factorization, or matrix determinates.
People are afraid of change. How many commentators does this education method even apply to? Especially when they're all complaints about it's perceived complexity, seems a bit ironic
It's also intentionally slowed down because 1. She's teaching, 2. She's not teaching students, if you listen, she's teaching the parents, 3. She's showing all her work, 4. She's spreading it out so she can answer questions from the group about individual steps. But yeah hurdur new math scary
It’s meant to just be basic math, yet this method is quite the opposite. Ever since they started teaching common core, math became much harder for me to learn and keep up with.
@@violetchan6402 How old are you? Have they started teaching you algebra? Generally speaking schooling gets harder the further along you get. Not to mention that correlation does not imply causation, it's just as likely that you're experiencing symptoms of the broad inability of education to keep up with modern demands
The purpose of this common core method isn't for adults to do math quickly and efficiently. We have calculators and computers to do that. It's so that students can get a better understanding of what's actually going on with the numbers when they learn them, so they're better prepared for more advanced maths like algebra (multiplying expressions works like this except you have variables instead of decimal places) and science (this method is basically a punnett square for example).
1: It breaks down the multiplication in simpler steps which is a good thing to learn how to do on easy problems before you get more complicated ones. 2: It avoids doing multiplication and addition at the same time (eg 2*3+1) 3: There is less risk doing it wrong. One major problem with the method on the right is if you forget to move the digits one position to the left for the second row. 4: There's a rectangular structure to the numbers which can be easier to follow than just writing the numbers (this of course does not apply to all students) 5: Area of rectangles is less abstract than pure numbers 6: It can give a deeper understanding of what multiplication is, and is also very similar to a method for solving quadratic equations. The purpose of mathematics teaching in school is not for students to become calculators, but to learn. It is not how quickly you solve a task that matters, but what you learned from it.
![C&C Red Alert 2 Soviet Mission 3 Big Apple [Normal]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/boMGvmMvgMk/mqdefault.jpg)
The final proof of superiority of soviet armies against the weak capitalistic math!
but COMMON Core is literally from communists in government...
@@SamGarcia “Everything I don’t like is communism”
Lmao China doesn’t use this shit.
@@BigGamer2525 China isn't communist. It's a hybrid of capitalism with communism.
URAAAAAAAAAAA
@@SamGarcia it's called "socialism with Chinese characteristics" and it is not even remotely close to communism. to achieve communisim, first you have to liberate all of humanity, then eradicate social class differences, and then you will not need a state and its muscles because there's no class struggle to keep at bay at all. then, you got communism.
ignorant western capitalist brats don't even know what communism is and call all competitor countries communist states. hilarious.
So hypothetically, if she multiplied 3535 with 1212, you would be able to complete the Chrono Defense mission before she finished.
3535*1212
= 3000 * 1212 + 500 * 1212 + 30 * 1212 + 5*1212
= 3636000 + 606000 + 36360 + 6060
= 4284420
would be easier if you could write it down properly, but youtube doesn't use a monospace font. Still could do it in less than 30 seconds.
The dog at the ene
Why needlessly overcomplicate it when you simplify it to basic addition?
3535 * 1212
= e ^ ln(3535) * e ^ ln(1212)
= e ^ ( ln(3535) + ln(1212) )
And then you just ask ChatGPT to solve the logs and exp cause that's what kids do these days, amirite?
35*12=35*10 + 35*2=350+70=420 You can do it like that without even writing anything down. Besides it's insanely hilarious, thanks for good content :)
This guy maths
@@Fajoekit is it bad?
@@szajba8106 it's a compliment.
@@Fajoekit oh, thanks then :)
Eyyy, someone else who does the weird place-by-place mental math.
I'm surprised this video hasn't blown up on youtube yet, it's really funny good job lol
Your math won't save you from millions of parachuters dropping to Pentagon
Soviets: [quickly and efficiently taking over the world]
Meanwhile Einstein:
Also Einstein: Constantly trying to warn the commander.
Einstein in Santa costume: (sets down bag of gifts and starts to reach inside it) "Commander, I have something very interesting to show you."
Einstein pulls out... _____________[complete the sentence]!
@@stephenforsberg4038 communist manifesto, he has seen the flaws in the system and has joined the soviet union
@@stephenforsberg4038 Mirage Tank?
Let's admit the fact that SE did not even adjust game speed to fastest!
It's silly playing it on fastest on newer computers.
By newer I mean anything made after about 2002. 😅
Watching this teacher teach math makes me feel dumber.
Welp, we don't know who she's teaching. Maybe, they're preschoolers
@@marinauder No way in hell anyone would teach this method to preschoolers let alone any student with half a brain.
that's literally the point, making peopl,e more stupid.
Do you even look at left side of the screen?
@@miguelafonso6375 Let me explain:
1: It breaks down the multiplication in simpler steps which is a good thing to learn how to do on easy problems before you get more complicated ones.
2: It avoids doing multiplication and addition at the same time (eg 2*3+1)
3: There is less risk doing it wrong. One major problem with the method on the right is if you forget to move the digits one position to the left for the second row.
4: There's a rectangular structure to the numbers which can be easier to follow than just writing the numbers (this of course does not apply to all students)
5: Area of rectangles is less abstract than pure numbers
6: It can give a deeper understanding of what multiplication is, and is also very similar to a method for solving quadratic equations.
The purpose of mathematics teaching in school is not for students to become calculators, but to learn. It is not how quickly you solve a task that matters, but what you learned from it.
If only they taught shit proper, kids would have most of the period to roast each other in multiplayer lol
I ruined your 69 likes
@@BWITHYURI I will terminate your battle control for this
@@Spellmyname25 come at me bro!!!! *sends 30 kirovs*
"Hello, where is nearest grocery store?"
"Oh, just go straight and turn right"
Her: "First, you need to get sense of direction, if you go in the morning then Sun is at the east that means we are now facing at the west, after you discover where you at, then you need to head west and looking an intersection, at intersection you need to headed north, you may keep a steady pace and the grocery store is a store that sells grocery items and it a one of a store that faced to the west"
Yes, one is a method to do it efficiently, the other is a thorough explanation for people who may or may not understand the underlying necessary context, like students in a classroom.
@@Cruxador that shit makes it more complicated and difficult you can easily teach someone the basis without that retarted explanation and time waste
if i ask for directions and they start giving me that shit i will just immediately assume "oh they think i'm a moron" and then leave and just figure it out myself so I don't have to deal with the internal agony of waiting for someone to get to the fucking point and finally answer what I asked. If I need additional elaboration I will ask, and the fact that public schools are allowed to pack 30 kids in a classroom with one teacher so that teaching cannot be done properly is absolutely disgusting, because children do not have the social development mental capacity or legal ability to be able to tell off their shitty teacher for wasting precious minutes of the day, probably up to an entire fucking classroom period, on a single, simple, multiplication problem, and to be honest with the current state of the public education system I question whether their parents have the social development and mental capacity to do it either.
Description of what is intersection is missing!
To the left is my teacher in high school. To the right was me, who was allowed to play on my laptop when I finished my work.
Multiply and Carry is the easiest to dominate and crush your answers.
That's the reason why we played more games during school years and not studying!
Teacher: "Ten times thirty is three hundred."
Me: "Kirov Reporting!"
I read that in Kirov's sound lol
3:09 I wasn't expecting a big Chonk boi to come out lol
That math "lesson" really hurts to even listen. It's as if a blind person explains to others what colors are.
Yes, she's a teacher of children clearly, and teaches as if teaching to children.
She didn't even need to draw the box. She just needed to do FOIL, which is basically distributive property of operations.
Yes, but a punnett square is easier to understand than going straight to foil because the graphical structure (the box) helps scaffold learning for students that might be confused without it.
We usually use the square for factoring trinomials in algebra, not basic number operations. The box makes more sense in algebra because you can't add two variables to make a simpler form.
the bigger problem in my opinion is that we are trying to make things "easier" by adding more steps, which works in the 3rd or 4th grade when they're just doing multiplication but will make even pre-algebra problems daunting because the way you've taught basic multiplication and division (god knows what they're teaching now for division) has now doubled the amount of steps they're going to do to solve just parts of main problem.
physically drawing the square helps with visualization but also is a crutch that will discourage the slower or lazier students from practicing without it.
@@barrag3463 The steps are still there either way, you're just doing them in your head in the method that looks more efficient. Once the kids know what they're doing, this more elaborate method has already served its purpose.
Although this is actually also a good way to conceptualize the process of multiplying algebraic expressions with each other.
Common core math making it harder for everyone to understand.
The purpose of this common core method isn't for adults to do math quickly and efficiently. We have calculators and computers to do that. The other thing to keep in mind is that common core doesn't say to do any one method, but rather, to do several methods. This specific method is one of the for that curriculum writers figure would be a good way to do it. The goal is that students can get a better understanding of what's actually going on with the numbers when they learn them, so they're better prepared for more advanced maths like algebra (multiplying expressions works like this except you have variables instead of decimal places) and science (this method is basically a punnett square for example).
It's basically turning the mental process of normal people into a verbose formula for retards to follow.
Problem is that everyone else gets held back.
they just need to make it relative..
for example: if you have 30 conscripts and 12 are gunned down by G.Is for the glory of the Rodhina, how many Conscripts are remaining and how many will you get in return? :D
if you answer "as many conscripts that the Map can handle" you deserve Star of Lenin
He solved the problem using contemporary solutions AND finished the mission with time to spare.
It's funny, disrespectful and shows how pathetic these new fangled methods are.
Brilliant.
That transition to ra2 is hilarious, every time it gets me.😂
The sad thing is it’s essentially the same thing just the common core way makes it more complicated than it needs to be. It’d be useful shown that way once and only once to show the underlying logic for students who care to know.
It's not exactly the same.
Proper way: 35*12 = 35*(10+2) = ...
Common Core: 35*12 = (30+5)*(10+2) = ...
It may be easier if you are some sort of idiot robot but otherwise it's much worse.
Showing students the underlying logic is the point, as you gathered, but the thing is that students won't likely understand and internalize after only being shown once, and the purpose of public schools is to educate all the children, not just those who care to know. Of course, it's not the most efficient way, but students don't need to be efficient since in real life they'll have calculators, understanding is much more important. And this method helps tie in to future learning in more advanced maths like algebra (multiplying expressions works like this except you have variables instead of decimal places) and science (this method is basically a punnett square for example).
That has the be the LEAST EFFICIENT method of teaching I've seen in quite a long time. Woman, we're multiplying two numbers, NOT MAKING A BLOODY MATRIX
1: It breaks down the multiplication in simpler steps which is a good thing to learn how to do on easy problems before you get more complicated ones.
2: It avoids doing multiplication and addition at the same time (eg 2*3+1)
3: There is less risk doing it wrong. One major problem with the method on the right is if you forget to move the digits one position to the left for the second row.
4: There's a rectangular structure to the numbers which can be easier to follow than just writing the numbers (this of course does not apply to all students)
5: Area of rectangles is less abstract than pure numbers
6: It can give a deeper understanding of what multiplication is, and is also very similar to a method for solving quadratic equations.
The purpose of mathematics teaching in school is not for students to become calculators, but to learn. It is not how quickly you solve a task that matters, but what you learned from it. Efficient learning and efficient solving are two different things.
The purpose of this common core method isn't for adults to do math quickly and efficiently. We have calculators and computers to do that. It's so that students can get a better understanding of what's actually going on with the numbers when they learn them, so they're better prepared for more advanced maths like algebra (multiplying expressions works like this except you have variables instead of decimal places) and science (this method is basically a punnett square for example).
The dog at the end is my spirit animal
Ofc, im not a teacher, but I think, that the "math method" in video, will be easily tear up any wishes to count anything.
Bro solved the math problem, and still had enough time to wipe the Pentagon off the map, with some extra time to spare.
I salute you comrade.
"Superb commander"
Zofia's voice lines are way better than that woman trying to teach multiplication in a roundabout way
Is that how they're teaching right now? It's like they're trying tp recreate a shortcut method but is failing miserably.
Also, great to know people are still playing RA2
I think it just to show how multiplication done... But if it's really what school teach to us now... this world be damned
I am one of the people who plays ra2
Reinventing the wheel
She forgot to check mark the 10, will not get full credit for the solution
Me doing homework quickly before playing RA2 be like
То, как она решает эту задачу - сложнее, чем сама задача...
my dumbass is so bad at math that the lady explaining that problem STILL actually taught me something with that example of multiplying 10 * 30
Meanwhile Yuri's follower just used a calculator on his iYuri.
Who needs brain working when you have Yuri's glorious device?
I bet that teacher would complete 1st soviet mission in under an hour.
doubt
They taught me this crap in 2003, i cant believe theyre still doing this
They also thought me this back in High School. Thank god I'm an Adult now.
That process on the left is kinda how you multiply matrices tho...
@Brennan Lu Yes it is? Similar to a 2*2
my dumbass took too long to figure out what was happening since I was more focused on the right side
Oh my fucking lord.. Best ending to a video ive2 ever seen ever.
Online Class be like:
So if the woman hypothetically multiplied 3535 to 1212, it will take the same time as the final Allied mission of taking Moscow in RA2.
Even your handwriting is much more superior than the petty Capitalist teacher, tovarisch!
Bruh, shes not even talking to kids, shes talking to the PARENTS of the kids so they can help them take light years to come to simple solutions, shes big braining
I failed math, and this is one of those times I realize, it wasn't ever my fault. They just stopped teaching what I started learning as a kid.
oh mah childhood...
BTW, the way you draw the 5 disturbs me...
So he's one of the people who write 5 from bottom o_0
Why learn math, when you can in the same time invade pentagon instead?
Also, this pug is always golden ^^
Is this really how they did math during my dads time?
Am I glad I grew up with C&C RA2 YR and not that.
No, this is how they do it today. Back in our parents’ times it was like one the right but even simpler
@@AVerySexuallyDeviantOrange Why change a working/running system? What are they thinking?!
@@ReaVen443 They think kids get dumber as the days go by, instead of realizing kids simply are unmotivated and unhealthy
That was a little too real tho so how bout that red dawn speedrun?
@@ReaVen443 bold of you to assume they are thinking
what a chad, if u get the calculation done and instantly goes to c&c
You have wonderful penmanship.
Do you see this sh*t, comrade general? The new kid took down the Pentagon before the common core math can give you the result of 35x12.
I understand what common core is trying to accomplish but it's basically "fast math as explained by people who cant do fast math to an audience that will be graded based on showing work."
35 x 10 = 350
35 x 2 = 70
450 + 70 = 420
Holy shit america
America is doomed
Common core is for the kids who can't figure this out on their own. Teaching those kids separately is discrimination, so everyone else has to be held back until they catch up.
Was never taught like that and I graduated in 2020. Method on the right was used always
If you did punnett squares and FOIL, you were taught like this.
Are you American?
This is pure gold
The little dancing pug at the end ❤
Common core shouldnt be a written, or even a teachable subject. It's something you pick up along the way, needing to simplify your mental process.
You can 'teach' it as like a small tidbit info so that younglings dont rely on calculator or brute force mental calculations, but dont teach them like a regular subject.
It's a mental gymnastic, you crawl before you start to run.
This is a good point, something I think about math is it depends a lot on having an epiphany and suddenly gaining comprehension of how it works, and encouraging those epiphanies isn't really how our pedagogy is set up. However, I do think common core when done correctly (remember, common core is a set of standards, not the curriculum built on those standards) is intended to help guide students towards those epiphanies.
Shit, its time to fucking learn Mandarin and/or Russian if this is the direction America is headed in
lol
Россия
Try Japanese, their schools are a good bit like China but without the liveleak logo constantly signaling your impending doom
Are you running that on a chromebook? Truly the american school system.
This is why my math score always bad.
Teacher always told me using her long method.
If you multiply 35721 by 47212, you would theoretically finish all missions
yep best to keep it simple and not have so much useless drivel.
0:30 kral şakir confirment
Aaaaa abi tekrar izledimde kral şakiri görünce şaşırdım nsjsıenxke
iyi bir gözün var 👌
@@ScorchedEarthPH Muhtesem
To be fair, you did start earlier than she did. You should’ve start when she started to write on the whiteboard
He also skipped the cinematic and initial section with no control.
he speed run red alert soviet mision while teacher explaining other way to multiplicate numbers :D
Lmao what the hell is that multiplication method, point me to the one who thought of it so I can slap him.
It was Reginald Punnett. He died in 1967. Although he used it in genes, not basic math.
If the woman in that video is reading this....
I hope for the love of humanity your ovaries took the longest vacation ever.
HAHA Epic Bro!
I was shocked no one knows the left method is faster than the right one when digits getting larger. And ironically the method is called Karatsuba Multiplication and was invented by a soviet person.
Soviet Union everywhere, don't resist
10x 35 = 350 + 2x35 =70 // 70 +350 = 420
I'm gonna need an explanation on what the person did to get that result really quickly. I'm very curious
You split up the numbers. 35 x10 and 35x2 -> 350 and 70 -> 420
I'm not familiar with the method on the left, I was always taught the one on the right.
It's a shame that the method on the left receives so much ridicule, as it is far easier for younger students to grasp the visual concepts of areas. Further, learning the area decomposition method is a stepping stone towards traditional long multiplication anyway, with the added benefit that it teaches students to focus on reducing the complexity of problems.
As an engineer, I also appreciate that the area decomposition method has much closer ties to traditional geometric mathematics which also lays the groundwork for understanding more complex mathematical concepts like completing the square for quadratic factorization, or matrix determinates.
People are afraid of change. How many commentators does this education method even apply to? Especially when they're all complaints about it's perceived complexity, seems a bit ironic
@@HomieusErectus Couldn't agree more.
It's also intentionally slowed down because 1. She's teaching, 2. She's not teaching students, if you listen, she's teaching the parents, 3. She's showing all her work, 4. She's spreading it out so she can answer questions from the group about individual steps.
But yeah hurdur new math scary
It’s meant to just be basic math, yet this method is quite the opposite. Ever since they started teaching common core, math became much harder for me to learn and keep up with.
@@violetchan6402 How old are you? Have they started teaching you algebra? Generally speaking schooling gets harder the further along you get. Not to mention that correlation does not imply causation, it's just as likely that you're experiencing symptoms of the broad inability of education to keep up with modern demands
By the time you will finish doing simple math calculation - soviets will finish conquering mercia.
faster: 35*12=35*2*6=70*6=420
Yes what a waste of time
Einstein's moment
Teacher : ☕️
This all adds up to me
You cant make me to count the strategy
You can only keep a thing on the theoretical side for so long...
I apply this math on the moon mission as well
my man solved it before this weird explaination started.
The only math l need is how much conscript l needed to erase capitalism from the face of the earth
Too many, because we have Prism and Mirage Tanks on our side 😎
I was taught Common Core Math in the junior high... Shit was complicated
Yes, Pinnacle efficiency
En son matematik videosu izliyordum buraya nasıl geldim aw
I am so glad I was never taught that retarted method
The purpose of this common core method isn't for adults to do math quickly and efficiently. We have calculators and computers to do that. It's so that students can get a better understanding of what's actually going on with the numbers when they learn them, so they're better prepared for more advanced maths like algebra (multiplying expressions works like this except you have variables instead of decimal places) and science (this method is basically a punnett square for example).
-BAKAMONOGA- You fools! Soviet's math method is number one in the world!!!!
Damn good video lmao 🤣
0:00 KRAL ŞAKİR
this is the most rediculous written multiplication ive ever seen
Math = Pentagone.
kral şakir ???
EVET, KARDEŞIM
@@ScorchedEarthPH demek türksün ha adam be
@@purpleguy5823 yok, ben sadece bir süre ankara'da kalan bir adamım.
@@ScorchedEarthPH iyi işte türkce biliosan sıkıntı yok
@@ScorchedEarthPH adamsın
The heck that left math??
Does anyone know the name of the last song?
This is fucking hilarious
Holy shit they really teach this to kids?
Oregon they lowered the bar to graduate high school to the ground literally.
1: It breaks down the multiplication in simpler steps which is a good thing to learn how to do on easy problems before you get more complicated ones.
2: It avoids doing multiplication and addition at the same time (eg 2*3+1)
3: There is less risk doing it wrong. One major problem with the method on the right is if you forget to move the digits one position to the left for the second row.
4: There's a rectangular structure to the numbers which can be easier to follow than just writing the numbers (this of course does not apply to all students)
5: Area of rectangles is less abstract than pure numbers
6: It can give a deeper understanding of what multiplication is, and is also very similar to a method for solving quadratic equations.
The purpose of mathematics teaching in school is not for students to become calculators, but to learn. It is not how quickly you solve a task that matters, but what you learned from it.
@@Hedning1390 see , details matter.
This king şakir book :)) 0:00
I'm an Engineer and I dont even know this lol, screw my career.
Join the Soviets and convert every structure to the red way of things and get buff = a career worthwhile ;)
or yuri can enslave those capitalists to do the math for him.
jokes aside I have solved 3x3 systems faster than that ship.
35 x 12 = 35 x 10 = 350, + 2 x 35 = 70; 350 + 70 = 420
So simple...
But with this method, the communists destroy the Pentagon before you do the math 😄
But that's the thing. If everyone did it thwt way, nobody would have the time to destroy the Pentagon.
....Me during Google class
пока они будут умножать пентагон уже будет захвачен)
У меня только один вопрос. Что это за мудреная система умножения слева? В советской школе, в которой я учился, такой фигне не учили.
Wherever "Common Core" is taught