This Overlooked Energy Source Could Supply 50% Of Electricity

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 พ.ค. 2021
  • Miles below the Earth’s surface, there’s enough thermal energy to power all of humanity for the foreseeable future. It’s called geothermal energy, and it’s poised to play an increasingly large role as a source of always available, renewable power. Now, there are a number of startups in the geothermal space, working to figure out how to access this heat in difficult to reach geographies, at a price point that makes sense. And it’s even gotten the attention of oil and gas industry giants, who are interested in greening their portfolios while sticking to their core competencies - extracting energy resources from deep within the Earth.
    » Subscribe to CNBC: cnb.cx/SubscribeCNBC
    » Subscribe to CNBC TV: cnb.cx/SubscribeCNBCtelevision
    » Subscribe to CNBC Classic: cnb.cx/SubscribeCNBCclassic
    About CNBC: From 'Wall Street' to 'Main Street' to award winning original documentaries and Reality TV series, CNBC has you covered. Experience special sneak peeks of your favorite shows, exclusive video and more.
    Connect with CNBC News Online
    Get the latest news: www.cnbc.com/
    Follow CNBC on LinkedIn: cnb.cx/LinkedInCNBC
    Follow CNBC News on Facebook: cnb.cx/LikeCNBC
    Follow CNBC News on Twitter: cnb.cx/FollowCNBC
    Follow CNBC News on Instagram: cnb.cx/InstagramCNBC
    #CNBC
    How Geothermal Energy Could Power The Future

ความคิดเห็น • 929

  • @iamtembo
    @iamtembo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +342

    Fun fact; Kenya is the largest geothermal power producer in Africa with geothermal accounting for over 38% of electricity produced in the country. There's still potential for more power production thanks to the natural hot springs we have along the Great Rift Valley. Proud Kenyan here 😁🇰🇪🇰🇪🇰🇪

    • @jarradscarborough7915
      @jarradscarborough7915 3 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      now see, why doesn't someone go and make a video about that?? i'd watch it! i guess people still like thinking about africa as a backwater, not on the forefront of progress...

    • @briannjoroge2344
      @briannjoroge2344 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      yaaaay! Kenya is so far ahead. But we all know what pulls us back

    • @briannjoroge2344
      @briannjoroge2344 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @George Mann all Kenyans know about all the amazing infrastructure government promises that have never materialized. Kenya has amazing plans on paper but extremely inefficient execution and horribly corrupt leaders

    • @syedabishosainrizvi7817
      @syedabishosainrizvi7817 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@briannjoroge2344 😩 Is that not the case for every country, brother? My country made the first five year plan for South Korea. A pakistani economist introduced the human development index, and PIA, our national airline literally made Emirates airline. and yet.... look where these politicians, corrupt people have brought us.

    • @fredwerza3478
      @fredwerza3478 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@briannjoroge2344 --- most African nations are being held back by corrupt governments

  • @huskiefan06
    @huskiefan06 3 ปีที่แล้ว +223

    Fell in love with geothermal while exploring Iceland, who have been using it for years. Having the energy available 24/7/365 is pretty great! Such an underrated energy source.

    • @rudyvon5279
      @rudyvon5279 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      These fools only think of the short-term gains and not the long-term consequences. They are delusional to think that this won't be scaled up to an extent to jeopardize our planet's magnetic field within 1,000 years.

    • @dertythegrower
      @dertythegrower 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Geothermal powering plants, and methane capturing power plants on animal farms, would highly reduce far greater climate changes than all cars

    • @benghazi4216
      @benghazi4216 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      @@rudyvon5279 Using that kind of small fraction of the earths heat does nothing.
      The present burning of fossil fuels have accelerated the wandering of the magnetic north, since we have less ice in the arctic.

    • @danielcarroll3358
      @danielcarroll3358 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      @@rudyvon5279 The thermal resistance of the thousands of miles of rock between the power plant and the molten part of the core ensures that your worries are baseless.

    • @rudyvon5279
      @rudyvon5279 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@danielcarroll3358 At the moment, the heat close to the Earth’s surface is reachable. With technological advancements, reaching further down will become economically doable and scalable. Anything that accelerates the cooling of our planet’s internal core is dangerous. Say bye-bye to our protective magnetic field, along with the loss of the Earth’s atmosphere and hello to the sun’s deadly radiation. The advocacy of geothermal energy is wrong and shortsighted.

  • @organizedchaos4559
    @organizedchaos4559 3 ปีที่แล้ว +313

    Gonna come back in 5 years and see which company have succeeded.

    • @aarone1777
      @aarone1777 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Y
      Qe'll know; we'll all know!😑

    • @deadringer2349
      @deadringer2349 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      As if we have 5 years.......🤣🤣🤣

    • @daved5023
      @daved5023 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is the worst solution ever,. They use fresh water from the 1% we can use just so we can have power ..

    • @aydencz1239
      @aydencz1239 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@daved5023 Well Desalination's biggest cost is actually energy consumption. If we can get energy costs down by using geothermal then it makes Desalination more worthwhile. However, harnessing geo thermal energy does look expensive, so justifying it for Desalination may be a stretch, but still just a thought.

    • @necroth9149
      @necroth9149 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@aydencz1239 it woudnt be a bad idea, and it makes sense, the problem is the brine water that kills everything arround by having to much salt in the water zone that the plant is located on.
      Most of the water desalitanions plants that exist they press the water so the salt stays behind and the clean water can pass trough, its energy efficient that way but still fks the envoirment anyway, but if you could steam it and separate the salt and the water and make it viable by having clean energy going on it, you could get free water, free power, and free salt, 3 birds 1 stone xD

  • @gusstavv
    @gusstavv 3 ปีที่แล้ว +59

    There are geothermal plants in Europe where the used water, which is still warm, is used as geothermal baths and have an extra revenue as a touristic attraction.

    • @meow-ic6gz
      @meow-ic6gz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      im looking forward to this here in the philippines we have t6he largest caldera in the world called apo laki which means we can havest huge energy from the sea which is way more safer than springs in the suface cause calderas emits 0% carbon footprints we can may also supply electricity to all south east asian countries then to taiwan and china in GOD's willing we can also supply energy to australia nee zealand and other asian countries but i may be day dreaming here 😁😁😁

  • @iannjari6833
    @iannjari6833 3 ปีที่แล้ว +463

    Fun fact. In 2020, over 50% of Kenya's electricity came from geothermal energy.

    • @lozoft9
      @lozoft9 3 ปีที่แล้ว +55

      They're sitting in a continental rift valley, just like Iceland

    • @wolfmanoperator4153
      @wolfmanoperator4153 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Not to mention Kenya is much smaller than the US

    • @redragen1523
      @redragen1523 3 ปีที่แล้ว +57

      @@wolfmanoperator4153 but it’s still thousands of kilograms of carbon dioxide out of the air

    • @tanmayjaiswal5935
      @tanmayjaiswal5935 3 ปีที่แล้ว +60

      I think Kenya gets 41% of it's total energy from geothermal right now but they plan to get 50+% by 2030. Still a great achievement for a small nation using early tech

    • @emuriddle9364
      @emuriddle9364 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@wolfmanoperator4153 If anything, the United States would have a greater advantage. Because they have more land space to use.
      1. Drill into the earth.
      2. Extract magma.
      3. Use it to power a steam turbine.
      4. Infinite electricity.
      Big brain stuff.

  • @conornorris6815
    @conornorris6815 3 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    honestly I could see this becoming the number 1 source of energy since no one is taking into account the true talent of the oil companies which is lobbying the government

    • @rdean150
      @rdean150 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Brilliant and true. Oil companies can move mountains (literally), so long as they stand to profit from it.

    • @fredwerza3478
      @fredwerza3478 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Oil companies will likely have a monopoly on battery production in 20 years --- that's where all the money will be once gasoline goes extinct

    • @meow-ic6gz
      @meow-ic6gz 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      im looking forward to this here in the philippines we have t6he largest caldera in the world called apo laki which means we can havest huge energy from the sea which is way more safer than springs in the suface cause calderas emits 0% carbon footprints we can may also supply electricity to all south east asian countries then to taiwan and china in GOD's willing we can also supply energy to australia nee zealand and other asian countries but i may be day dreaming here 😁😁😁

    • @connorb9097
      @connorb9097 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hello

  • @AFAndersen
    @AFAndersen 3 ปีที่แล้ว +84

    I'm glad that this video focus so much on Icelands Geothermal energy generation

    • @Brandon_letsgo
      @Brandon_letsgo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The only real-world example of Geothermal's success. All the rest is BS. So I would not expect anything big from this source.

    • @leerman22
      @leerman22 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Iceland mostly use geothermal for thermal energy alone since it's not efficient enough for electric generation. They have lots of hydro for electricity anyways.

    • @danielcarroll3358
      @danielcarroll3358 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Brandon_letsgo California gets 4.5% of its electricity from geothermal power plants. A comparatively small amount but it is baseload. It was decreasing for a while as the steam was not being condensed and reinjected. Fortuitously a local city had lots of treated sewage to get rid of and two problems cancelled each other out.

    • @Brandon_letsgo
      @Brandon_letsgo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@danielcarroll3358 California is shutting down nuclear power plants. That's criminal! Large amounts of extremely clean electricity. Baseload.

    • @danielcarroll3358
      @danielcarroll3358 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Brandon_letsgo California is not shutting down anything. The utility that owns the last remaining nuclear power plant's two reactors plans to not upgrade them because of cost. The two reactors will close in 2024 and 2025. There is some discussion about converting to a battery peaking plant.

  • @specialopsdave
    @specialopsdave 3 ปีที่แล้ว +89

    Electricity in 1960: "Complicated extraction of fossil fuels or a highly advanced nuclear reactor powers us"
    Electricity in 2020: Haha sun and hot rock go brrr

    • @Ldeos
      @Ldeos 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      We didnt need to be so complicated ever. We just need the basics. A moogma farm.

    • @specialopsdave
      @specialopsdave 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Tom Servo Whooosh

    • @user-nf9xc7ww7m
      @user-nf9xc7ww7m 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I just capture pikachus and force them to power my home. 😋

    • @specialopsdave
      @specialopsdave 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Tom Servo That is the entire joke you dimwit, I'm making a joke about how you can misrepresent things through wording - that's the entire premise behind the "haha _________ go brrr" meme.
      Also, you just insulted basically every engineer from the 20th century by calling every last one of their manually-blueprinted technologies simple.

    • @beebob1279
      @beebob1279 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Depends on the era you’re talking about. Fifty years ago they were. Today probably not so much. But you still need special training to be there

  • @artificialintelligence2653
    @artificialintelligence2653 3 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    Nice video CNBC. Geothermal energy along with tidal energy, solar energy, and wind energy will power the future and will protect the planet as well.

    • @michaelhutchings6602
      @michaelhutchings6602 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Just build nuclear. Problem solved.

    • @artificialintelligence2653
      @artificialintelligence2653 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@michaelhutchings6602 Nuclear waste causes land pollution and takes hundreds or thousands of years to degrade.

    • @michaelhutchings6602
      @michaelhutchings6602 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@artificialintelligence2653 Nuclear waste in a non-issue. Currently, waste is stored onsite in dry caskets harmlessly. We should open Yucca Mountain (Obama closed it before it could open) so we can bury deep in the Earth. Meanwhile, solar and wind both have waste problems much larger than nuclear waste.

    • @xhawkeye8717
      @xhawkeye8717 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Geothermal for the win!

    • @artificialintelligence2653
      @artificialintelligence2653 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@xhawkeye8717 Yes

  • @realtalk5329
    @realtalk5329 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I bet Texas wish they had geo thermal during that winter blackout freeze

    • @user-nf9xc7ww7m
      @user-nf9xc7ww7m 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Pretty sure the wiring was an issue too. No wires = no power.

  • @chadbailey7038
    @chadbailey7038 3 ปีที่แล้ว +72

    Another great video! I’m learning SO MUCH from you guys. Thank you for this series. 🙏🏾

    • @meow-ic6gz
      @meow-ic6gz 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      im looking forward to this here in the philippines we have t6he largest caldera in the world called apo laki which means we can havest huge energy from the sea which is way more safer than springs in the suface cause calderas emits 0% carbon footprints we can may also supply electricity to all south east asian countries then to taiwan and china in GOD's willing we can also supply energy to australia nee zealand and other asian countries but i may be day dreaming here 😁😁😁

  • @NATESINTERACTIVEAUTO
    @NATESINTERACTIVEAUTO 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    fracking isn't the same thing. I did this for years. Depending on the system you need and land avaliable for schools, residential, it may be 8 holes drilled for a farm 250 feet deep each. You could have deeper holes or more holes but not as deep. Basically similar to a radiator, you use something environmentally friendly antifreeze liquid in a loop that liquid travels down and back up a closed system. Because the temperature is always the same allowing you to cool off the liquid or heat the liquid. There is another way thats even safer where its not deep at all and no drilling needed but you need more land to keep better efficiency. You could possibly hit gas drilling but i did this for years thousands of holes drilled and 1 released a tiny bit of gas that almost took my life because the meter to detect gas wasn't where it was supposed to be and I tried telling everyone but they worked they for 20 and 30 years ignoring me. You don't drill for gas oil water anything. You first conduct a thermal conductivity test. To see just how efficient it will be after you drill a test hole.

  • @ninjanerdstudent6937
    @ninjanerdstudent6937 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    They should have used Iceland as an example of geothermal. They already have access to the underground vents.

  • @rosaleslem
    @rosaleslem 3 ปีที่แล้ว +263

    A possible redemption arc for the oil industry, huh? Yeah, I'll be watching this anime series.

    • @kuenythiluang25
      @kuenythiluang25 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      😹

    • @michaelhutchings6602
      @michaelhutchings6602 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Redemption implies sin. The oil industry has done more good for humanity than nearly any other industry.

    • @thenarcompany
      @thenarcompany 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@michaelhutchings6602 Sure, but they have become enemies in the eye of the public, which is a clear cut definition for redemption.

    • @benghazi4216
      @benghazi4216 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      @@michaelhutchings6602 You can't make that statement halfway. We are in a mass extinction because of them, and it looks like we will not be able to stop the massive losses and even higher expenses to combat the effects of climate change either.
      Let's see if our civilization survives this first.

    • @michaelhutchings6602
      @michaelhutchings6602 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@benghazi4216 I would sacrifice every single endangered species if it meant every human had access to electricity.

  • @madbug1965
    @madbug1965 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Just don't contaminate the ground water in the process like fracking does.

    • @billythorne
      @billythorne 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They won't, they explained in the video that they use non-toxic chemicals.

    • @unconventionalideas5683
      @unconventionalideas5683 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's much easier with geothermal fracking b/c there is no petroleum of gas to leak into and contaminate groundwater.

  • @ninjanerdstudent6937
    @ninjanerdstudent6937 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    A science and tech related video from CNBC. This is what I subscribed for.

    • @meow-ic6gz
      @meow-ic6gz 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      im looking forward to this here in the philippines we have t6he largest caldera in the world called apo laki which means we can havest huge energy from the sea which is way more safer than springs in the suface cause calderas emits 0% carbon footprints we can may also supply electricity to all south east asian countries then to taiwan and china in GOD's willing we can also supply energy to australia nee zealand and other asian countries but i may be day dreaming here 😁😁😁

  • @peterbarlow7781
    @peterbarlow7781 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Eavor’s tech (closed loop) is the best for sure. California had major problems with their Geothermal during the drought. Those plants take up huge amounts of water as not all of that is reclaimed/condensed.

    • @Freshbott2
      @Freshbott2 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's absurd they ever built ones that weren't closed loop

    • @peterbarlow7781
      @peterbarlow7781 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Freshbott2 sadly pumped water with no closed loop are accepted designs as you will see in the video and in use today. Madness.

    • @jimsonbonilla8233
      @jimsonbonilla8233 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@peterbarlow7781 Because it allows to extract more heat from areas with less volcanic activity within a given depth.

    • @peterbarlow7781
      @peterbarlow7781 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jimsonbonilla8233 yeah ok but it takes a massive amount of water to generate enough steam. The next major war will be fought over water. It’s not worth generating electricity this way imho.

    • @unconventionalideas5683
      @unconventionalideas5683 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@peterbarlow7781 Back then, there weren't water shortages like now, and they weren't fully foreseen, either.

  • @banditxo2909
    @banditxo2909 3 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Oil Companies : We're good guys now, give us more subsidies

    • @beebob1279
      @beebob1279 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I guess it’s no different from people who don’t want to work because they’re still collecting unemployment and stimulus checks.

    • @meow-ic6gz
      @meow-ic6gz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      im looking forward to this here in the philippines we have t6he largest caldera in the world called apo laki which means we can havest huge energy from the sea which is way more safer than springs in the suface cause calderas emits 0% carbon footprints we can may also supply electricity to all south east asian countries then to taiwan and china in GOD's willing we can also supply energy to australia nee zealand and other asian countries but i may be day dreaming here 😁😁😁

    • @dodobeebee7352
      @dodobeebee7352 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Every other company: No we're the good guys, give us the subsidies!

  • @FlyingMonkies325
    @FlyingMonkies325 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You have the best info anywhere i've been looking for months to try and find exactly what's going on and how things are changin but i couldn't find enough, thanks for putting these up.

  • @diablo55
    @diablo55 3 ปีที่แล้ว +117

    even if this won’t single-handed let save the world, geothermal, wind, solar, nuclear, and biomass has a role to play in the future

    • @michaelhutchings6602
      @michaelhutchings6602 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      The world is not, nor has ever been, in danger.

    • @salsa564
      @salsa564 3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      @@michaelhutchings6602 ok denier

    • @michaelhutchings6602
      @michaelhutchings6602 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@salsa564 Not one scientist claims climate change will destroy the planet. Earth has survived an asteroid hitting it. Environmentalists rely upon hysteria to convince people to support their religion.

    • @durao891
      @durao891 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      @@michaelhutchings6602 the world is not, but we are

    • @michaelhutchings6602
      @michaelhutchings6602 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@Dimitris_Balf Climate related deaths have never been this low in human history. Ever.

  • @jackcurrence263
    @jackcurrence263 3 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Of the renewable energy sources, geothermal is the most exciting to me for the simple fact that it can be scaled such that it provides for the bulk of a home's/building's HVAC needs while using relatively little electrical power to "fill in" any gaps. I just wish the price would come down... :-/

    • @vwarbase277
      @vwarbase277 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Offshore wind is really cool too

    • @youwhatsuptube
      @youwhatsuptube 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nuclear all the way, cant use this tech in space or mars

  • @carlislebailey8902
    @carlislebailey8902 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Another great and probably the most sustainable concept we need to focus on this technology to advance

  • @aubreylore7134
    @aubreylore7134 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    I love learning about companies who are putting so much effort into better energy. Obviously it's for a profit, but it makes me very happy.

    • @jmatt98
      @jmatt98 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      No one will do it for charity

    • @eddapultstab2078
      @eddapultstab2078 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Companies invest when they see possible returns. Governments are usually on the front line funding research. The internet and velcro for example where the results of government funded programs like Nasa and darpa which brought returns in its own right through commercial but lately funding research and programs has dropped over the years and the only way the private sector would invest is if they can profit off it in a few years.

    • @unconventionalideas5683
      @unconventionalideas5683 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Nothing's wrong inherently with profit-seeking. This sort of thing is why Adam Smith wrote his book. In his opinion, this sort of thing is exactly what happens most of the time in a functioning market. Of course, our markets and financial situations/mechanisms are more complex, which more easily enables the perversion of these mechanisms to do evil, but profit-seeking is still not inherently an evil thing; it can be done in a very civically-minded way, as weird as that may sound. It can be done very ethically.

    • @brendan100ify
      @brendan100ify 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The profit motive drives innovations.

  • @MichaelGalt
    @MichaelGalt 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome report! All different approaches and all seem really promising.

  • @elgracko
    @elgracko 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    might be another green alternative for places like Texas, no? plenty of unused wells.

  • @a.k732
    @a.k732 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    kenya in Afrika has geothermal plants,,,its the leadin country in Africa in geothermal energy production. for america to say its expensive thats insane.

    • @specialopsdave
      @specialopsdave 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's because the US actually requires that you don't destroy the environment, whereas companies in Africa can get away with as much water and soil pollution as they please, a problem that is unfortunately caused by the highly unregulated development in Africa. If we don't act soon to stop cheapo, environmentally insensitive mining and drilling for profit, Africa will be more polluted than Europe or the USA.

    • @a.k732
      @a.k732 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@specialopsdave plz geothermal is steam from underground its very friendly to the enviroment. geothermal is green energy plz do your research....kenya has also the biggest wind energy in afrika. 80 percent of kenya energy is green

    • @specialopsdave
      @specialopsdave 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@a.k732 So fracking is green now? Since when?

    • @a.k732
      @a.k732 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@specialopsdave the energy is green,,,and the area where its done the steam comes out by itsself,,,and its a kenyan company called kengen brother. we have the capacity to do it and we have enviromental regulatory bodies. currently we are helping ethiopia to start their plant too

  • @stevengreidinger8295
    @stevengreidinger8295 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    To complete their reporting, CNBC needs to give us forecasted cost numbers per gigawatt/hr, and compare the arc of this technology with the forecasted falling costs of other renewables.

  • @organizedchaos4559
    @organizedchaos4559 3 ปีที่แล้ว +71

    Doesn't fracking causes issues later on with the ground being unstable? I think the close loop system is best.

    • @srinivasdadi3873
      @srinivasdadi3873 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      as long as we do it sustainably then everything should be fine

    • @NATESINTERACTIVEAUTO
      @NATESINTERACTIVEAUTO 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Please fracking isn't the same thing. I did this for years. Depending on the system you need and land avaliable for schools, residential, it may be 8 holes drilled for a farm 250 feet deep each. You could have deeper holes or more holes but not as deep. Basically similar to a radiator, you use something environmentally friendly antifreeze liquid in a loop that liquid travels down and back up a closed system. Because the temperature is always the same allowing you to cool off the liquid or heat the liquid. There is another way thats even safer where its not deep at all and no drilling needed but you need more land to keep better efficiency.

    • @jarradscarborough7915
      @jarradscarborough7915 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      depends on the methods done, i know of it being done using synthesised water and pressure instead of using reactive chemicals, so the seismic consequences stopped when the fracking process stopped, nothing longterm.

    • @alexipestov7002
      @alexipestov7002 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      In effect, you're advocating for Binary plants rather than Flash plants.

    • @brian2440
      @brian2440 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@srinivasdadi3873 interesting seeing as EGS systems both in the US and internationally face THE SAME EXACT seismic issues as hydraulic fracturing, yet its magically different, because it’s now “green”.
      Scientifically that’s called bs....

  • @desmondknows
    @desmondknows 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    "20 Million years of power right under the Earth's surface" - Jacque Fresco interviewed by Larry King (1974). Watch it now.

    • @MrSvenovitch
      @MrSvenovitch 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      No. Let's burn some wet wood instead. Life on Earth need not and will not survive.

    • @pissoffeachother
      @pissoffeachother 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Jacque was too ahead of his time.

  • @brentsrx7
    @brentsrx7 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    At least my dream is being accomplished by someone, better than nothing lol.

  • @El.Duder-ino
    @El.Duder-ino 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Definitely agree this type of energy harvesting should be explored and brought up scale for masses!

  • @BrettWarniers
    @BrettWarniers 3 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    YES I want my computer powered by lava! Let's Goooo!

    • @kristydevi3192
      @kristydevi3192 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I think harnessing heat from volcanoes and deserts is a great idea...👍🌋🏜

  • @jefferee2002
    @jefferee2002 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    So other than ALLLLL the challenges, geothermal could meet our energy needs

  • @mtken0321
    @mtken0321 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    In Pohang, South Korea, there was a case that earthquake was triggered related geothermal development. Geothermal plant sounds fascinating but should be researched thoroughly

  • @kennethferland5579
    @kennethferland5579 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Closed loop systems have a major advantage, they wont pick up the salts and heavy metals which are invariably in any subsurface water, particularly hot water. As the point is to extract that heat their is an inevitable drop in solubility and crystallization of these salts and metals as the liquids cool. If that happens above ground in the power plant it can cause enormous damage, or if it happens in the well it can clog it and choke off the whole process. In some instances the metals have value and a controlled precipitation can yield extra revenue, but this is site specific, so a design which just eliminates the whole issue will be a boon and greatly lower the long term costs of geothermal power.

  • @wabuhwabuh8674
    @wabuhwabuh8674 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You don't even need a water source underground...you can create a closed loop system and install it where the heat is....you don't need a reservoir.....

  • @homo-sapiens-dubium
    @homo-sapiens-dubium 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    City of Basel, Switzerland tried to use this about 15 years ago & had an earthquake, really bad PR, its the greatest idea ever :)

  • @victorpinasarnault9135
    @victorpinasarnault9135 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    The geothermal energy industry needs a lot of research on geology and geomorphology. Actually, they need a role new level of technology on that.

    • @elainelouve
      @elainelouve 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I believe they're already working on it. Perhaps not as much in the US though. This video was good, but lacking in perspective.

    • @bobramirez588
      @bobramirez588 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s already happening. The technology is available and scalable. Millimeter microwave directed energy drilling allows for extremely deep drilling without the problems of a drill bit melting or wearing out. We can get to extremely hot depths that the oil industry can not reach using standard technology. Therefore the need for extra geological modeling has been lessened considerably

    • @buttlesschap
      @buttlesschap ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bobramirez588 What about geophysical data from gravity and magnetic/magnetotelluric surveys? Do they have a greater role in identifying and surveying deep geothermal wells?

  • @Nice-Life-Travel
    @Nice-Life-Travel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    We hope to see the implementation of this technology asap all over the world 👍😊💐

  • @alexfrank5331
    @alexfrank5331 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Groundwater drilling also literally solved water-supply issue, too.
    Human greed always prioritize profit over future/safety/ethics and that's why tragedies keep repeating itself in human history.

  • @darthwader4472
    @darthwader4472 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Wouldn't bringing heat up from underground faster than it's "natural" speed cause an increase in the equilibrium temperature of the biosphere, i.e. exactly the problem already caused by the greenhouse effect?

  • @torstenpersson2058
    @torstenpersson2058 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Several testsites in Europe has shown there are many issues back to solve.
    The results are mostly devastating.
    Earthquakes and choked "tubes" have lead to closed test sites.

    • @death5913
      @death5913 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That only happens in Europe Most earthquake can't even be noticed

    • @kreb7
      @kreb7 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You know what Greecks call 5 Richter scale earthquake. .... exactly nothing.

  • @zhenqizhang3165
    @zhenqizhang3165 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I work for geothermal industry in the U.S. Geothermal energy can generate electricity 24/7. This is the under dog of renewable energy that no one talks about.

  • @vaibhavkr5659
    @vaibhavkr5659 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice video but why did you reverse the clip at 4:45 of the lamp turning off? It is throwing me off so much

  • @axvarela
    @axvarela 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Is not that fancy as wind or solar power, but it's the better example of a renewable resource.

    • @Morhua1
      @Morhua1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      What makes it not fancy? It seemed very advanced to me.

  • @XxXenosxX
    @XxXenosxX 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Love geothermal. That and small scale nuclear are the big game changers if we invest in then

  • @Demoneric25
    @Demoneric25 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excelent video, congratulations

  • @larryheath1195
    @larryheath1195 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would be also be advantageous at locations where geothermal plants are installed to tap into these plants that can provide very inexpensive heat / electricity to run all year long soil free greenhouses (see Netherlands that use these greenhouses). Can have multi level greenhouses (do not need sun just heat for building and high efficient electric lights for plans that will grow the equivalent of hundreds of acres of field but they can produce 4 or even 5 seasons of vegetables every year in the same location. The closer to the population areas these are the less trucking costs are to then move these vegetables to market.

  • @rjweiss1
    @rjweiss1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Wow sounds like it’s really....heating up

    • @xxxBradTxxx
      @xxxBradTxxx 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I guess you say they're going full steam ahead

  • @wineberryred
    @wineberryred 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Any 2050 promise is like saying I will never do that. Ten years is the furthest any real promise should go. Beyond that is just wishful.

  • @77Treasurehunter77
    @77Treasurehunter77 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Geothermal will be a huge boost for base power load......... it has always been under appreciated! It will definitely help to solve the problem, but maybe a bit of an exaggeration with the end statement.
    Wind and Solar have been over hyped and there is some room for efficiency improvements in them, but you have to produce a huge number of them to get anywhere near power supply levels needed for major cities.

  • @qxezwcs
    @qxezwcs 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Japan, Philippines, and Chile has the most untapped geothermal potential base on studies.

    • @monmonfiasco6391
      @monmonfiasco6391 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Actually here in PH we do have Geothermal but less than the coal and gas power plant.. because government wants to use the geo for tourism purposes like hot springs ..thats why a literal Ancient Volcano caldera here in PH has abundant of Hot spring Resort compared to a Single Geo thermal power plant also in the location

    • @patrickjohnesplana9770
      @patrickjohnesplana9770 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@monmonfiasco6391 may plano na dapat sa 2030 is 70% ng energy natin galing geothermal need na lang natin itong new technology na ito ska may tax break narin ang mga solar and wind company para mahikayat sila need lng tlga mawala yung 60-40 na ownership para makapasok pa mga company tulad ng nasa video na to

  • @JediMik
    @JediMik 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Welcome to Kamchatka 🤗

  • @mikerock8177
    @mikerock8177 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I've been saying it for years we should tap Yellowstone what Mega plants and we should also start filling the Grand Canyon with fresh water will create millions of jobs and a major difference in our ecosystem out in the West and the rest of the United States

    • @KRYMauL
      @KRYMauL 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      How would you reroute water to the Grand Canyon? The Hoover Dam is the main artery that hold the water back. The Western states need to invest in desalination plants.

    • @Multi407D
      @Multi407D 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      How? With what money? What is the opportunity cost? What is the return on investment? Who would finance it? Who would operate it? If you employee millions of people on an unprofitable expensive project, what happens to the rest of the economy? A million people filling the grand canyon with water, is a million people not building 5g towers, solar panels, designing semi conductors etc.

    • @KRYMauL
      @KRYMauL 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Multi407D Actually construction is a good way to reignite the economy, but I think turning to manufactured construction could be more lucrative.

    • @Multi407D
      @Multi407D 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KRYMauL Only if the construction yields real economic benefits, if not the money is better spent elsewhere. Society shouldn't be spending hundreds of billions of dollars and emitting insane amounts of co2 (and other greenhouse gasses), for infrastructure projects that aren't economically necessary.

    • @Multi407D
      @Multi407D 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KRYMauL To put it into perspective, the interstate highway system cost 500 bill (adjusted for inflation), and has yeilded trillions in additional economic growth. Hence, it was a worthwhile economic investment.
      In contrast, China spends (through SOE's, and direct government involvement), 500 billion dollars every quarter on government backed projects (between 2-5 trillion a year). Due to this, they used more cement in 2014, than the US did in the entirety of the 20th century. Creating insanely high amounts of emissions, on projects that were ultimately not used by the public (they built roads that lead to nowhere, and cities that no one wants to live in).

  • @chrischibird
    @chrischibird 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Though our star is set to expand into a Red Giant and consume the planet in 5 billion years, if left undisturbed, our planet's core would keep warm for tens of billions of years. It's a great resource.

  • @arthurwilton958
    @arthurwilton958 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Two things that might help geothermal energy a great deal are: 1) Electricity storage devices that would allow generation of geothermal electricity at one location and use somewhere else without the need for transmission lines and 2) Heat storage devices that could do the same. The first of these would also help geothermal energy's competitors (wind and solar energy) but the second would strongly favor use of geothermal energy. The best geothermal locations are probably on the ocean floor. Could we harvest the heat and then transport it for use elsewhere without pipes, etc.?

    • @smallbeans101
      @smallbeans101 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      No you cant transfer heat, at least significant amounts, without metal pipes or wires.

  • @nobitanobi8888
    @nobitanobi8888 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    It looks like we have our own sun under our feet.

  • @sn5301679
    @sn5301679 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    next calamity movies will be about "earth core become colder" because of the geothermal harvest,
    then earth become Mars

    • @alexipestov7002
      @alexipestov7002 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Eh, we'll need to extract insane amounts of energy to do that, so much that we'd be cracking open the Earth's mantle to get enough energy to exceed that lost to radiant loss over time.

    • @rdean150
      @rdean150 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@alexipestov7002 well i mean if we're actively injecting cold water down there 24/7... imagine if we built those type of plants all over the world...

    • @alexipestov7002
      @alexipestov7002 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@rdean150 Still not enough, we talking about migration of heat from the core out. What we seeing with volcanic eruptions and heat wells is the natural gradient.
      The only way to cool down the core faster is to have the equivalent of tectonic plates shifting every second. After all, the conservation of energy dictates that in order for the thermal gradient to be increased, we'll need to throw an increased amount into space.
      So we'd need to start an ice age, pump heat into space en masse, and then we'd start making the smallest of dents in the Earths total thermal energy.

    • @denislomtev1469
      @denislomtev1469 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@rdean150 humanity is like ants on the huge heater. You can crawl around and extract as much power as you like, the heater is don't care. It's a billion times more productive than you can waste.

  • @tytrvd
    @tytrvd 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is amazing

  • @nathanhaskell1743
    @nathanhaskell1743 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What if you combine geo thermal and desalination… If geo needs water to turn into steam and desalination needs energy to remove clean water it seems like a decent match. No doubt some creative problem solving would be needed but maybe there is something there.

  • @PaulHo
    @PaulHo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Glad to see a reckoning, just wish this new found enthusiasm to embrace renewable energy came decades ago.

    • @syedabishosainrizvi7817
      @syedabishosainrizvi7817 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      better late than never

    • @geraldmaxwell3277
      @geraldmaxwell3277 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Some nations like Iceland, Kenya and New Zealand embraced Geothermal a long time ago

    • @PaulHo
      @PaulHo 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@geraldmaxwell3277 to clarify, just wish this need found enthusiasm to embrace renewable energy came decades ago, from the oil companies.

  • @josephrowtey2236
    @josephrowtey2236 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    We have some here in Kenya I think the largest geothermal plant if not the only one in *Africa* IT SMELLS LIKE ROTTEN EGGS,,,😆😎

  • @manuelmoraleda9684
    @manuelmoraleda9684 ปีที่แล้ว

    The question should be - What are the forces that are preventing a more serious exploration of geothermal energy ?

  • @peterharmon7852
    @peterharmon7852 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Pge used to own Austin hot springs in Oregon. Curious why they gave up on it?

  • @Longtack55
    @Longtack55 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    In New Zealand and Germany there are lithium and silica extraction projects which involve using the Geo-heat to power the extraction and refining process, giving a zero-carbon return. In NZ we have been using Geo-power stations since 1958 (63 years) and 14% of national production is by Geo. The vast majority is Hydro-electric.

  • @Thuhglegend27
    @Thuhglegend27 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I have seen steam coming from the surface in New York, it should be an exellent place to build a geothermal facility because it is so close to a big city with high electricity needs! 😃

    • @maybethisismarq
      @maybethisismarq 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Is it geothermal steam? Because I know most steam in New York is produced from a large boiler which uses energy.

    • @kylemontgomery9851
      @kylemontgomery9851 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The steam in NYC (and other cities, like Denver) is produced by using heat from power plants (by product, generally referred to as waste heat) to boil water, and pipe it to buildings. Since it is powered by by-product heat, it is generally referred to as a renewable resource. Since NYC has no geothermal features in the ground, it would probably be difficult to build that

    • @specialopsdave
      @specialopsdave 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Whoosh train

  • @bnutti2537
    @bnutti2537 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I need the tickers ASAP lol I'm ready to invest early and flip

  • @ICEMAN-fp9zn
    @ICEMAN-fp9zn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Another step in the right direction 👍

  • @AbraCadabra619
    @AbraCadabra619 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    This has been around for decades, now we’re like “wow geothermal” we are so behind where we should be.

    • @syedabishosainrizvi7817
      @syedabishosainrizvi7817 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      In all honesty, had we developed geothermal instead of oil n gas, we would've been so far behind in the transport sector, probably relying on coal (steam). But now that we have developed oil n gas first, we have the advancement in drilling sector as well as transport sector.

    • @tonywilson4713
      @tonywilson4713 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes I agree the title of this is misleading, but then that's typical modern media they think we are all uneducated and ignorant.

    • @meow-ic6gz
      @meow-ic6gz 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      im looking forward to this here in the philippines we have t6he largest caldera in the world called apo laki which means we can havest huge energy from the sea which is way more safer than springs in the suface cause calderas emits 0% carbon footprints we can may also supply electricity to all south east asian countries then to taiwan and china in GOD's willing we can also supply energy to australia nee zealand and other asian countries but i may be day dreaming here 😁😁😁

    • @syedabishosainrizvi7817
      @syedabishosainrizvi7817 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@meow-ic6gz Good luck brother, May god help your country in such endeavors

  • @bradlycortis6584
    @bradlycortis6584 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    It requires money to make money. This is the best secret I have discovered we don't make money. We EARN AND MULTIPLY MONEY.

    • @clintonmendez8998
      @clintonmendez8998 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Bitcoin market is highly volatile and the underlying Investment should be considered a high risk Investment. However, Investors can avoid these risks with a bit agility and common sense. The first approach is seeking help from professional that has been there before you. The only way I can help you learn this business is if you try Mr Chris Fiffie. He has been a great mentor.

    • @peteroconnell7667
      @peteroconnell7667 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      There are people making millions in this field, banks trade this market constantly and generate revenues, but it requires a good set of skills, you need to be disciplined, have a plan and stick that plan. Risk management is important, no matter how sure your next trade will be a killer trade.

    • @tickersymbolyou2418
      @tickersymbolyou2418 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly,you are right sir, but Bitcoin trading recommend a lucrative and profitable broker.

    • @australiaopentv3147
      @australiaopentv3147 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      My first Investment with Mr Chris Fiffie gave me profits of over $24,000 and ever since then he has never failed to deliver and I can say he's the most sincere broker I have ever known.

    • @davidrichard448
      @davidrichard448 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I lost about $4,000 to a scammer before I was linked to Mr Chris Fiffie and believe me he has helped me recover the $4,000 and made an extra of $7,000 in the space of a week and 4days.

  • @marcosmedia7463
    @marcosmedia7463 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is the same as coal and oil or even better, because you don't have to go mining for resources or continually fuel the generator, and it has no emitions! It is constant and long lasting.

  • @palmshoot
    @palmshoot 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You guys missed an opportunity to discuss OTEC (ocean geothermal), which has the potential to pump out green hydrogen and/or desalinated water 24/7. There's one such plant in Hawaii right now.

  • @kirkjohnson9353
    @kirkjohnson9353 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Makes me want to move on top of a super volcano like Yellowstone.

    • @meow-ic6gz
      @meow-ic6gz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      im looking forward to this here in the philippines we have t6he largest caldera in the world called apo laki which means we can havest huge energy from the sea which is way more safer than springs in the suface cause calderas emits 0% carbon footprints we can may also supply electricity to all south east asian countries then to taiwan and china in GOD's willing we can also supply energy to australia nee zealand and other asian countries but i may be day dreaming here 😁😁😁

  • @jiekendinner
    @jiekendinner 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    When you thought Steampunk is the "Future of the Past" and now making it the "Future of the Present"

    • @meow-ic6gz
      @meow-ic6gz 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      im looking forward to this here in the philippines we have t6he largest caldera in the world called apo laki which means we can havest huge energy from the sea which is way more safer than springs in the suface cause calderas emits 0% carbon footprints we can may also supply electricity to all south east asian countries then to taiwan and china in GOD's willing we can also supply energy to australia nee zealand and other asian countries but i may be day dreaming here 😁😁😁

    • @jiekendinner
      @jiekendinner 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@meow-ic6gz you can say the same thing to everyone in the Pacific Ring of Fire, and also the Philippines is one of the top producers of Geothermal Power though we still have one of the most expensive electricity comparative to the purchasing power of peso which can scare off international investors to our country

  • @alparslankorkmaz2964
    @alparslankorkmaz2964 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice video.

  • @seasong7655
    @seasong7655 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dig deep for the magma energy just like in Franxx

  • @markblinks8597
    @markblinks8597 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Glad to say I bought my first house from investment I made on trade. It's 2021 and I know more is yet to come. This year is going to be better.

    • @benjaminleo9683
      @benjaminleo9683 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Congrats. Investing pays when you invest right. Happy it works for you how much do you earn

    • @Bellamariaa39gmailcom
      @Bellamariaa39gmailcom 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Great to know. How much profit do you make

    • @markblinks8597
      @markblinks8597 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      $9,520 every 7 trading days

    • @marypeters718
      @marypeters718 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@markblinks8597 congratulations dear

    • @vihaanaditya1505
      @vihaanaditya1505 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Big moves 🔥🔥🔥

  • @louisprice6413
    @louisprice6413 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    We should be careful on money useage,if you are not spending to earn back,then stop spending.

    • @GustavoSilva-cn9ew
      @GustavoSilva-cn9ew 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Apparently my view on the solution is to venture into business .

    • @jeffclarkinstitute6315
      @jeffclarkinstitute6315 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      True ! Even some rich men made it through investing there money in something doing and they made it.

    • @jackreynolds2426
      @jackreynolds2426 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I do real estate,stock market ,forest trade and cryptosystem.

    • @admin8015
      @admin8015 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The right chioce of an investment has always been a big problem for me I know picking a wrong investment will leave a big scar in the future

    • @jounisiren2732
      @jounisiren2732 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      There might be many investments out there but if profit must be considered,which is the actual sole of investment, I will advice you to go into bitcoin trading because it has higher profit than most investment.

  • @sebastianwrites
    @sebastianwrites ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Update: They've found a way of drilling using a 'laser' still in testing... but it could make this up to "10" times cheaper, and a whole easier!

  • @opossumlvr1023
    @opossumlvr1023 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yellowstone National Park is the obvious first choice for a geothermal project, also hot springs SD. How many locations in the continental USA do we have sufficient thermal energy to power a geothermal project that isn't protected as a park?

  • @eaglewarrior22
    @eaglewarrior22 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    100 years later
    Jor-El:
    you are not understanding
    earth's core is collapsing
    we may have a matter of weeks
    I told you harvesting the core is a suicide

    • @rdean150
      @rdean150 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ha! My thoughts exactly. Glad to see I'm not the only one.
      But seriously, this is a good idea and should definitely be used, but let's try not to overdo it like we did with oil and coal.

    • @2drealms196
      @2drealms196 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I wonder if tapping geothermal on a planetary scale could lead to faster cooling of the earths core which provides earth with its magnetosphere critical to our atmosphere. iirc Mars has no atmosphere anymore because its core cooled to the point it no longer provided the magnetosphere needed to keep its atmosphere.

  • @sel4201
    @sel4201 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I hope a pre-historic Lava balloon is not punctured when this goes global scale drilling everywhere 😂

    • @KRYMauL
      @KRYMauL 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      That makes no sense, the whole point of geothermal is to go around the lava because it makes the water hotter.

  • @shaun6828
    @shaun6828 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wonder how often temperature is captured in exploratory well records. Oil industry has drilled test wells all over the world. Probably not to the needed depths very often, but perhaps close enough to identify some warmer areas.

  • @dertythegrower
    @dertythegrower 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Geothermal power plants, methane power plants, and Vortex Hydro Energy is a huge advancement beyond solar and wind turbines. Please reshare the advancements to the right channels.

  • @saulgoodman2018
    @saulgoodman2018 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    And what are the negative effects of it?
    They just glossed over it, like it's a big deal.

    • @graymen
      @graymen 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      there is none

    • @saulgoodman2018
      @saulgoodman2018 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@graymen Yes there are.
      They even mentioned if for like 5 seconds. But really didn't say much.

  • @mdp125
    @mdp125 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    If I had a dollar for every time I've heard this one before.......

  • @aperson2730
    @aperson2730 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What an amazing video

  • @mahammadoutunkara6430
    @mahammadoutunkara6430 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you

  • @randikaliyanage3952
    @randikaliyanage3952 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I have watched too much Superman to know Krypton when I see it

    • @KRYMauL
      @KRYMauL 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Apparently Krypton doesn't blow up from too much geothermal. It mostly blows up because either supernova or harvesting the core for Uranium.

    • @DeusVult77763
      @DeusVult77763 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Geothermal harvests just the heat in the thinnest layer, the crust. This heat mainly comes from radioactive decay of elements and rising heat from the core. Which is very different from Krypton which was physically mining its core.

    • @guardianoffire8814
      @guardianoffire8814 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DeusVult77763 Mars solidified stopping the inner dynamo that generate the magnetic field. In works of fiction their is plot where the Earths inner parts start to cool and solidify due to geothermal energy. Most science shows predict that the sun would go super nova before Earth solidified.

  • @FinancialShinanigan
    @FinancialShinanigan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Yellowstone could be a great energy source but understand why it's off limits to development

    • @konigstiger3252
      @konigstiger3252 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It is off limit because useless tree hugger that does nothing but trying to reduce qol for other people

    • @hydrolifetech7911
      @hydrolifetech7911 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@konigstiger3252 there is enough places to build geothermal stations that you don't need to destroy one of the most iconic parks in the world

  • @slimjim3229
    @slimjim3229 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes more geothermal please.

  • @luc_libv_verhaegen
    @luc_libv_verhaegen 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Advertising for subsidies, much? But perhaps the subsidies that oil and gas today are getting could be directly diverted... Although i am not sure that these former oil and gas people fully agree with that sort of policy...

  • @wesleywatring7503
    @wesleywatring7503 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    About damn time! I've said for years that yellow stone could generate nearly the entire countries electricity.

    • @fredwerza3478
      @fredwerza3478 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Neel71 --- how did you post that font style?

    • @karlrschneider
      @karlrschneider 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      And it could be sent to New England in a pipeline. Or not.

  • @steveemery5692
    @steveemery5692 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Investing in crypto now should be in every wise individuals list, in some months time you'll be ecstatic with the decision you made today.

    • @jeremywallace3751
      @jeremywallace3751 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Most intelligent words I've heard.

    • @hatsapp3863
      @hatsapp3863 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, My first investment with Mr Charles Schwab earned me profit of over $25,530 US dollars, and ever since then he has been delivering

    • @hollyliam3194
      @hollyliam3194 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I got sir Charles Schwab info, how good is he ?

    • @Brugman100
      @Brugman100 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Gloria Reynolds +1=(9=1=9) =8=9=1=6=7=1=8

    • @hatsapp6014
      @hatsapp6014 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      My first investment with Mr Charles Schwab gave me the assurance that have made me invest without the fear of losing, I got four of my friends involved with him already

  • @Joeltravels
    @Joeltravels 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    No mention of Baseload capital and Climeon. Would be cool to have a more international perspective as these videos are views outside the us as well

  • @tommorris3688
    @tommorris3688 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Marvellous geothermal technology.

  • @chessdad182
    @chessdad182 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Cool down the earth's core. Goodbye magnetic field. Goodbye atmosphere. Think Mars.

    • @carholic-sz3qv
      @carholic-sz3qv 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Uhm wrong

    • @kisaolya38
      @kisaolya38 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      DESTROYING Earth

    • @pritam9596
      @pritam9596 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Firstly they are no way near to earths core, and the amount of energy they are sucking from this wells is so much little that if powerd entire plant for century by this, there is negligible change in the temp

    • @rudyvon5279
      @rudyvon5279 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Exactly. These fools only think of the short-term gains and not the long-term consequences. They are delusional to think that this won't be scaled up to an extent to jeopardize our planet's magnetic field within 1,000 years.

    • @elainelouve
      @elainelouve 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Or you could just google how geothermal energy works... smh

  • @rick-yo
    @rick-yo 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    A closed loop system pumping a fluid or molten salt down into the heated earth is the way to go! Water is also a precious resource. We don’t want to release it into the air as steam.

  • @prashanthb6521
    @prashanthb6521 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I hope this really takes off.

  • @bobbyc1120
    @bobbyc1120 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You have to look for innovation from every source. Not just the ones with a stated goal of saving the environment.