How to Build A Great Dividend Portfolio

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 มิ.ย. 2024
  • A great dividend portfolio will be diversified across sectors/industries to help provide stability and consistency. Dividend growth stocks are inherently larger and less volatile, so the question becomes how many dividend growth stocks to hold? The answer is at least 10, and ideally 15 according to the venerable CFA institute. We're holding 30 DGO stocks because we'd like to ultimately build an ETF off our Quantigence strategy. To do so, we need a systematic method of trimming our positions to ensure a relatively equal weight across our dividend stock portfolio. After a thorough review of the academic research out there, we believe that a value-weighted dividend portfolio trimmed using a quarterly systematic method is the optimal configuration.
    RESEARCH PIECES USED IN THIS VIDEO:
    1. The Best Dividend Stocks | How to Find Them • The Best Dividend Stoc...
    2. Living Off Dividends | The Power of Dividend Growth
    • Here's How Powerful Di...
    3. Dividend Growth Investing | The Best Dividend Growth Stocks
    • How to Find the Best D...
    CHAPTERS:
    Intro
    Why pay dividends
    Capital allocation strategies
    The importance of industry diversification
    How many dividend stocks to hold
    Steps to building a great dividend portfolio
    Dividend champions by sector
    Equal vs market cap weightings
    Rebalancing your portfolio
    Objective trimming rules
    Conclusion
    ABOUT US:
    This video is brought to you by Nanalyze, a media and research firm founded by finance professionals with decades of experience. We share insights about #DisruptiveTechnology #stocks in a language that is future-proof and easy to understand.
    Read all the Nanalyze Premium articles you'd like for free! Sign up for a 30-day trial of our monthly subscription with no strings attached: www.nanalyze.com/subscription...
    DISCLAIMER: Our content is intended to be used and must be used for informational purposes only. It is very important to do your own analysis before making any investment based on your own personal circumstances. You should take independent financial advice from a professional in connection with, along with independently researching and verifying, any information contained within our TH-cam videos or on our website, whether for the purpose of making an investment or otherwise.
    #dividendgrowth
    #dividendgrowthinvesting
    #dividendgrowthstocks
    #dividends
    #dividendstocks

ความคิดเห็น • 34

  • @Nanalyze
    @Nanalyze  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    You need to be subscribed to this channel before reading the below comments. Sorry, we don't make the rules.👮
    th-cam.com/users/nanalyze

  • @justinjohnson8398
    @justinjohnson8398 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    the dividend series is my fav by far!

    • @Nanalyze
      @Nanalyze  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Good to hear. Lots of people love our dividend content, and this channel affords us some leeway to explore that topic and others. Going into next year we'll be developing our dividend strategy - Quantigence - a lot more in terms of marketing it as a separate product. Joe P.

  • @tagsoneveryting
    @tagsoneveryting 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for this. This is great info. So glad I found this channel.

    • @Nanalyze
      @Nanalyze  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We're glad you found us too!

  • @NoelDexters
    @NoelDexters 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I will watch this episode again every month to remind myself of mistakes I make , tanks , I just subscribed to your newsletter

    • @Nanalyze
      @Nanalyze  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for the sub! We'll have more dividend content coming out in the future.

  • @liltunafish1471
    @liltunafish1471 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Liked and comment for algo. Thx again for another vid

    • @Nanalyze
      @Nanalyze  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you kindly for the support! Your likes and comments help increase YT's engagement score which forces those seedy little algos to yell our messages a bit louder ;)

  • @xPlatiinHD
    @xPlatiinHD 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    As always a great video.
    Off topic question: what do you think of Solaredge, especially in relation to demand drop warnings.

    • @Nanalyze
      @Nanalyze  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you for the feedback! Great question to pose on our Discord server. ;)

  • @3zRides
    @3zRides 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great lesson on portfolio weightings

    • @Nanalyze
      @Nanalyze  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Glad you found this useful!

  • @realthatbrian
    @realthatbrian 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Informative! Thanks. Some sectors had 6 stocks in them, so I chose 3, and some sectors had 3-4 options, so I chose 2 from those. I ended up with 25 stocks. I used screening tool to choose stocks with faster growth and solid years of dividend growth. Put ythe lot into M1, and I'll start with 1k, and add to it from there.

    • @Nanalyze
      @Nanalyze  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's great to hear! You're most welcome. We can't vouch for M1 as we usually recommend retail investors stick with major brokerage firms to reduce systemic risk.

  • @user-hm7st4eu8y
    @user-hm7st4eu8y 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video, clear and actionable rules for portfolio construction!! On the capital allocation model I believe prior to FCF available for shareholders an assessment and decision on capital structure to reach optimal debt level is needed. It will be also great to have something more recent on the small vs large cap performance. I guess the academic world can help on that. Thanks again!!

    • @Nanalyze
      @Nanalyze  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Good point on considering debt as well. The small vs large cap performance topic could use a refresh - it' has become a "it's always been that way" sort of thing.

  • @boratsmagadijev940
    @boratsmagadijev940 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great content, but I'd appreciate a comparison with SCHD, DGRO, or similar dividend growth accumulating ETFs. I have a feeling it might be challenging to outperform these ETFs with a privately managed dividend growth portfolio...
    Additionally, I have a question: Would it be advisable for a passive investor to hold both an S&P 500 ETF and a dividend growth ETF, or would it not be worthwhile due to potential overlap and associated costs?

    • @Nanalyze
      @Nanalyze  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      We barely touched the contents of the paper which examines the strategy extensively including performance. It will become available in due time. Remember, you can always torture the data and make it say anything you want. Your last question would require an examination of the constituents of each ETF to find overlap. You should be able to do that easily with Excel.

    • @henrik4438
      @henrik4438 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Depending on your age I would do:
      40 or younger 1/3 SCHG, 1/3 SCHD, 1/3 VOO.
      There will be some overlap and you could do also 2/3 VOO and 1/3 SCHG.

    • @boratsmagadijev940
      @boratsmagadijev940 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That sounds terrible. LMAO @@henrik4438

  • @koszalekopalek9068
    @koszalekopalek9068 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Regarding re-balancing: what if few positions increased to 6.66% in your portfolio, but not by gaining so much, but rather due to other positions loosing/decreasing in value? Would you be selling better performing stocks to add to not the worse performing (less gaining) but to actual loosers?

    • @Nanalyze
      @Nanalyze  หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Great questions! When you have a large portfolio (our DGI portfolio is 30 stocks) that doesn't happen too often (everything loses so a few "winners" get propped up. Regarding selling winners and purchasing laggards, we did a paper on this strategy and it showed that this effectively generates alpha over time. Covered here: th-cam.com/video/jr8YlUduTD4/w-d-xo.html

  • @joseguerrero2221
    @joseguerrero2221 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Magnum opus!

    • @Nanalyze
      @Nanalyze  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's our favorite place to invest money for sure. Quantigence is a great strategy that's only getting better as it ages - like a magnum of Opus One. ;)

  • @absw6129
    @absw6129 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Interesting. While I do care about diversifying across industries, my main diversification strategy has more to do with different business qualities.
    For example: part of my portfolio is "slow revenue growth, but high cash flows and bought cheaply".
    Another category for my portfolio is: "fast growers, not yet profitable, but likely a strong moat".
    I also have a specific one for REITS only.

    • @Nanalyze
      @Nanalyze  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That's another way to look at it. This analysis was largely concerned with a very small universe of stocks and the methods one might use to diversify within the set - number and industry mainly.

    • @user-hm7st4eu8y
      @user-hm7st4eu8y 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Business qualities diversifications is good, I think it will resemble a kind of of factor’s diversification approach. Having a look on the industries distribution of the portfolio can be still useful. There are studies that 50% of a stock’s movement can be attributed to its industry.

  • @davidp252
    @davidp252 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I like to rebalance by never selling ever (unless something breaks in the profit-earning model)

    • @Nanalyze
      @Nanalyze  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Good idea! That's the best time frame according to Buffett. Our approach for DGI is to only sell for one reason only: when dividend growth stalls. That said, we might revisit that based on research described here: th-cam.com/video/jr8YlUduTD4/w-d-xo.html

  • @jasonhesseltine3520
    @jasonhesseltine3520 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So setting up a portfolio composed of around 30 dividend champion stocks, three from each sector, equally weighted and trimmed quarterly in a Roth IRA account? Hmm. Sounds like fun.

    • @Nanalyze
      @Nanalyze  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Hah! Good point. It can be as complex or as simple as you like. For example, we have a 30-stock portfolio that's mixed among the 11 sectors and we trim occasionally based on excessive weighting (not quarterly). The paper mentioned in the video takes a more holistic look at performance using a different method, but the same Q-score methodology. For those who don't want to get their hands dirty, there are plenty of decent dividend ETFs out there. We'll look to launch one for Quantigence eventually.

    • @jasonhesseltine3520
      @jasonhesseltine3520 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Nanalyze Hey, thanks for writing back! I meant 'sounds like fun' very positively, with relish. It does sound like fun to pick from the champions, balancing between sectors, and regular trimming. I will read the paper you mentioned in the video. I've got a roth through an employer at a brokerage I don't like, so I want to take the reins of my own first of next year. In my research, I'm torn between index funds, dividend ETFs or the method you've outlined, or a combo. I really appreciate your videos. I'm a regular watcher. Plus great travel tips ... if I get ripped off by one more Bangkok taxi driver ... maybe I'll learn my lesson? 😀

    • @Nanalyze
      @Nanalyze  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@jasonhesseltine3520 Joe here, the guy blabbing away in the video. :) You sound like me. I love this stuff and don't mind managing a more complicated strategy.. Our paper isn't quite finalized yet, though we'll be - at the very least - making it available on our website. We'll let everyone know when that happens. While we'd like to publish it, both the authors are beginning some great jobs now and it's a matter of time and resources. Taking control over your Roth is a great idea when you're prudent as you are. We talk to many people doing the same thing. If you have time, the management can actually be enjoyable and you learn a lot. Glad you appreciate our videos and my occasional travel tip! Good to hear you're plying the streets of Bangkok and enjoying some of the great food "Asia" has to offer.