SIGMA 100-400 E-Mount REVIEW: The BEST SUPER ZOOM Lens for SONY

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 มิ.ย. 2020
  • I'm GIVING AWAY A CAMERA VALUED UP TO $4,999!!! Enter the SUper HUGER Camera Giveaway right here bit.ly/megafro2020
    This video is brought to you by FroPack2 which includes 15 ALL NEW Custom Lightroom Presets. Get 40% OFF right here at froknowsphoto.com/fropack2/
    Click Here to download sample RAW FILES froknowsphoto.com/sigma100400e
    Grab this lens on Amazon amzn.to/2YcdnlV
    Grab this lens at Allen's Camera allenscamera.com/fro
    This is a review of the SIGMA 100-400mm Lens designed from the ground up for Sony E Mount Mirrorless Cameras. Lenses like this are perfect for wildlife, outdoor sports, capturing kids and pretty much anything else you can think of where you need some extra zoom range.
    What makes this lens unique is that it's designed for mirrorless bodies. That means it's smaller, lighter and designed to work specifically with Sony E Mount and the L Mount Alliance.
    Since the zoo is closed, I borrowed a few kids to test this lens out. Being that I was using a Sony, I was able to utilize lock-on tracking and eye-af which makes photographing kids much easier. The lens focused fine, the OS worked well and the zoom range is extensive. I do expect a 150-600 one day, but that's going to much heavier and larger then this 100-400mm lens.
    Download MyGearVault mygearvault.com/#download
    Get a FREE Guide To Capturing Motion In Low Light Situations froknowsphoto.com/ (look for the orange box)
    USE CODE FroKnowsPhoto at squarespace.com/froknowsphoto to get your 14 day FREE Trial.
    ___
    Gear I USE
    I SHOOT RAW Camera Bag bit.ly/2scQRt7
    I SHOOT RAW T-Shirts bit.ly/2vG2igB
    My Go To Mirrorless Camera as of now
    Sony a7R IV amzn.to/2PfcTaA
    Sony a9 II amzn.to/2poUpdr
    SIGMA 35mm f1.2 amzn.to/2rLO8Jr (FAVE LENS)
    Nikon Z6 bit.ly/2FcKsWJ
    The Microphone I use for Vlogging bit.ly/2LWGRPq
    Nikon 70-200 2.8 bit.ly/2OBsjmY
    Nikon 24-70 2.8 VR bit.ly/2LLHdsQ
    Nikon 14-24 2.8 bit.ly/2LK1NtU
    Nikon 105 F1.4 bit.ly/2vttwUq
    Sony a7 III bit.ly/2n3HaK8
    My Rolling Bag Of Choice For Flying bit.ly/2LNsHRK
    Follow me
    ►TH-cam: bit.ly/frotube
    ►Facebook: / froknowsphoto
    ►Instagram: / jaredpolin
    ►Twitter: / froknowsphoto
    Please help us continue to make FREE content
    by purchasing one or all of the FroKnowsPhoto
    Educational guides. To check out previews of
    each guide click here.
    ►froknowsphoto.com/guides
    #FroKnowsPhoto #JaredPolin #SIGMA100400

ความคิดเห็น • 421

  • @froknowsphoto
    @froknowsphoto  4 ปีที่แล้ว +65

    WHO WANT THIS LENS????? I'm GIVING AWAY A CAMERA VALUED UP TO $4,999!!! Enter the SUper HUGER Camera Giveaway right here bit.ly/megafro2020

    • @MrMcburnij
      @MrMcburnij 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes please 😲 gimmi gimmi gimmi haha although would force me to finally upgrade camera

    • @louisburley1597
      @louisburley1597 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'd love an Art lens equivalent someday. I love my Sigma Art 24-70 for the Sony.

    • @tayway639
      @tayway639 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Tis would be nice, especially for I.

    • @creep4415
      @creep4415 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Does it allow 20fps when on an A9? Or limited to 10fps?

    • @liamdoran2149
      @liamdoran2149 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I photographed some wildlife with it last night. Really sweet lens. Of course I'm a slight bit biased ;)

  • @Johnniepetersimages
    @Johnniepetersimages 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I love your videos man. I’m 43 and it’s just down to earth and real. Appreciate it.
    I’m buying this lens today. Been endlessly researching between 150-600 sigma, all Sony telephoto lenses, tamron etc. And I feel this is the best fit for zoo/ animal / wildlife photography in my budget

    • @leonsvideos
      @leonsvideos ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hey, now that you've had it for a while, how is it holding up? Do you regret not getting the 150-600? Cheers

  • @OmarCordy
    @OmarCordy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I was thinking of the dslr version. I'm glad I waited. I want this eventually. When I have to do sound board shoots again

  • @Akulion1
    @Akulion1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I really enjoy your humour, thank you for doing something different from others. Your videos are unique and fun to watch, while also pack in all the relevant information needed. Great job 🙏💗

  • @michaelgass6164
    @michaelgass6164 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    EYE Want One! Nice review as always Mr. Polin. Much appreciated!

  • @TuckerPearce
    @TuckerPearce 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for answering all of my questions in this video. I’m thinking I’ll use it for my son’s soccer outside of course.

  • @XavierMinguellaPhotography
    @XavierMinguellaPhotography 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    You can pump the zoom through the lens hood, that's why the lens hood design it is in the low part, to put your fingers there too, like it happens in the DSLR 100-400 lens.

  • @bryantaustin5186
    @bryantaustin5186 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for your review. Just purchased this lens today!

  • @theopeningbrothers6252
    @theopeningbrothers6252 ปีที่แล้ว

    Man I enjoyed to watch this video !
    Keep up with the good work and a fine sense of humour!!!

  • @mikestephenson9334
    @mikestephenson9334 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Jared, thanks for the video. After watching the video, I began to search for the Sigma 100-400 lens only in Canon EF mount. I checked with all of the major sellers, you know who they are, but also because of your recommendation I checked out Allen's Camera. All of the major online sellers had the lens for $799.00 and I almost dropped my teeth when I saw Allen's Camera price of also $799, but wait, they had a $190 instant rebate which made my price only $609. I instantly ordered the lens, thank you for recommending Allen's Camera and this will not be my last purchase from them.

  • @joffercalifornia
    @joffercalifornia 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I really loved this review. It was so much fun.

  • @ClassicCyclingCC
    @ClassicCyclingCC 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the review. I enjoyed watching this video.

  • @chuckmoser9662
    @chuckmoser9662 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I am rooting around in the couch right now looking for loose change. I want this lens. A7RIII, 24-105 f4, 100-400, Travel kit complete.

  • @Axonteer
    @Axonteer 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    i hoped for the l-mount alliance shout but it didnt happen now im sad :-(

  • @abhinavashishaind
    @abhinavashishaind 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Happy to see this lens from Sigma. Still waiting for the 150-600 for Sony E-Mount.

    • @julahazarika76
      @julahazarika76 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      U can easily get that range on the apsc lineup

  • @raGEEE1986
    @raGEEE1986 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Deffo considering this over the gmaster as it would net me the tamron 70-180 2.8 also within the same money - any tests on the a9 ?

  • @miket.1933
    @miket.1933 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    awesome! I was waiting for a cheaper alternative with more than 200mm.

  • @saeedahmed_40
    @saeedahmed_40 4 ปีที่แล้ว +146

    I really want Sigma to make a 70-200mm for e mount

    • @georgestancl2283
      @georgestancl2283 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      it has been announced way before tamrons 70-180 yet it never came out... I am slowly giving up waiting

    • @adrian_de_graaf
      @adrian_de_graaf 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      The Tamron 70-180mm is an absolute beast of a lens; I love shooting with it!

    • @brodi81
      @brodi81 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@adrian_de_graaf I almost went with it, but I ended up pre-ordering the Sigma. I still have my Tamron 70-200 for my Canon 6D and that camera is still just fine for studio portraits.

    • @GBO76
      @GBO76 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@adrian_de_graaf I would have bought that one if it wasn't so expensive here in Europ, and if it was compatible with the Sony 2x converter (it's not).

    • @johnhummel8810
      @johnhummel8810 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I use the sigma 70-200 sport for Canon with the mc-11 adapter. A bit heavy but works great.

  • @georgius78
    @georgius78 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amo seus videos !!! O melhor de todos !!! Congrats from down here in Rio de Janeiro.

  • @consumeboxing
    @consumeboxing 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like your style. Good review. I learn a lot just looking at your videos.

  • @nuclear64_
    @nuclear64_ 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    this lens looks like a lot of fun. I'll totally get it if released for the RF mount.

    • @nuclear64_
      @nuclear64_ 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gerardferry3958 Interesting, I'll look into it.

    • @refsjourney
      @refsjourney 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Agree RF mount option will take my money instantly

    • @darkesto
      @darkesto 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gerardferry3958 what lens exactly are you talking about?

  • @gregturner_awod
    @gregturner_awod 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I’ve pre-ordered (in Australia). Cost wise and for performance, plus light weight make the decision to buy easy. Thanks for a great review.

  • @jesseroussellmusic
    @jesseroussellmusic 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    great review as always. I would've liked to see a brief AF video on this lens

  •  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Might get this for my Lumix S1, and as I have sad before the reviews is more than just reviews. You can always learn something about photography.

  • @uncle_toobs
    @uncle_toobs 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ill be 100% getting one of these for some plane spotting!

  • @nerforeos675
    @nerforeos675 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Sigma has been knocking it out of the park lately. Great quality and affordable. I hope they make some for the RF mount.

    • @wyoder9511
      @wyoder9511 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Well this aged well 💀

    • @nerforeos675
      @nerforeos675 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@wyoder9511 Yeah. I'm selling all my Canon gear lol.

  • @christophemathieu-musiccom728
    @christophemathieu-musiccom728 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love your reviews!!! thanks

  • @bigbrownmab189
    @bigbrownmab189 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I dont shoot sony, but the lack of grain at ISO 2500 for that sunset shoot was pretty damn good with that lens!

  • @mikldude9376
    @mikldude9376 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I am glad it passed the wind tunnel test , without the wind tunnel test it would have been a. " no go " , thank you Jarod 👌.
    On a serious note , it seems to do the job fine ,
    Wondering when it will be available in the shops , I cannot see a mention of it down under as yet.

  • @costals9
    @costals9 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The wind tunnel test did it for me, I've seen enough, I'm getting one!

  • @jackcrackerman
    @jackcrackerman 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Would love to see this compared to the Sony SEL70350GOSS

  • @lorenzo4262
    @lorenzo4262 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    PLEASE ANSWER
    HI Jared, does It mantain focus while zooming?
    Image qualità Is at the same level of 70-200f4?

  • @kilohotel6750
    @kilohotel6750 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I picked up a 100-400 Canon from Allen’s on Tuesday, store is back open for in store purchases.

  • @MrPhilbautista
    @MrPhilbautista 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    There are many parents who like taking pictures of their kids playing sports in fields, like baseball or football, and this would appeal to them. And given the great low light performance of Sony's newer cameras, it should do well in indoor settings too, like indoor sports or recitals and plays. And at under a grand, this should appeal to a lot of beginning professionals who want to get into shooting indoor events like graduations but don't have the budget for Sony glass.

  • @Nyraksi
    @Nyraksi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for this review Jared! I own a SONY a7iii and really want to get into wildlife photography. This lens is actually in my budget. I'm also saving for the Tamron 70-180 and 28-75 :)

  • @Pdraver333
    @Pdraver333 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'm very happy with the performance of my Sigma 100-400 Contemporary for Canon EF + MC-11 I use with my A6500. I'd like to see someone do a comparison of the adapted lens and the new one. I'm guessing there wouldn't be enough difference to tempt me to upgrade ( I hope). I think the 100-400 and the Sigma 16mm f1.4 are about the sharpest lenses I own.

  • @charleskung7002
    @charleskung7002 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Been meaning to get something beyond 200mm, almost dropped money on the Sony 70-350 G for my a6500, but now this gets announced. Kinda glad I didn't jump the gun back then. This will work on both my a7RII and a6500. Definitely worth the wait.

  • @alexandrah.4244
    @alexandrah.4244 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Have you also tested the Sony 70-350 for APSC ? Do you think That’s the Sigma is a better Option?
    Because i use the Sony and don’t know, if i sold it for the Sigma🤔

  • @sydneytomlinson
    @sydneytomlinson ปีที่แล้ว

    I just bought this lens used from Japan and I can't wait to get it!

  • @paulcollingridge8387
    @paulcollingridge8387 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I was dreaming of the Sony version as its close focus mfd is great, but this has the potential to make my dream come true

  • @sbf11
    @sbf11 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    This will be my next lens for my A7iii. Wind tunnel test was the deciding factor!

  • @5tonney
    @5tonney 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I’m looking for a lens case for this lens (don’t know why it didn’t come with one!) any recommendations?

  • @TRwalks
    @TRwalks 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I feel Sigma has been designing more interesting lens then anyone else lately. For instance how many companies have made a f/1.8 zoom for aps-c cameras.

  • @garbageman9145
    @garbageman9145 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    11:49 Fro how do you do that video screen and the effect of shooting frames? Thanks, great video I don't have a sony but if I did it looks like a solid lens.

  • @Wynner3
    @Wynner3 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That range and price is tempting. I have used my Nikon 200-500mm with adapter on my Sony a7ii for wildlife shots.

    • @dlaudiojogja
      @dlaudiojogja 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      What brand Adapter bro? I own Procore + 200-500mm in A7iii : AF is bad

  • @ayhancapan
    @ayhancapan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks for this review. Can you please test it with Sony APSC such as a6000 :)

  • @thevideochannel4634
    @thevideochannel4634 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does it have the same image quality and sharpness as the DG one with mc-11 adapter on a sony body? Has anyone done a side by side comparison?

  • @cryhavoc38
    @cryhavoc38 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Coming to the L mount as well. Gonna get me one for my S1R

    • @mattcme
      @mattcme 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I wish Jared could do a little review to see the compatability, but for the price I'm gonna go for it aswell!

  • @larbueno
    @larbueno 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I used to not like you, Jared, but after I watched your history of Jared video and see how you've worked your ass off to get where you are, I'm a fan. Congratulations! I know. Too many commas.

  • @nathanscoincollection4397
    @nathanscoincollection4397 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I defiantly want to get this lens.

  • @axxxxman
    @axxxxman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Definitely getting this one once I have the money saved. it will work on my a6100 until I can afford a full frame Sony.

  • @Azn_Bran
    @Azn_Bran 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    This is perfect for me. I just completed my Tamron trinity and I was looking at the 100-400 GM but I would much rather spend half of the amount! Anyone know if Tamron is planning on doing a 100-400?

  • @kevinmeldrum1
    @kevinmeldrum1 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have the Canon version with the e-mount adapter is it worth changing over to the straight e-mount?

  • @Abarataphoto
    @Abarataphoto 4 ปีที่แล้ว +64

    The lens look quite nice. Though I don't know if your review meets the target market of this lens. I don't believe many will buy it for portraits (and even if you got some nice pictures there!), but mostly for a budget choice for nature/bird/sports photography. Instead of taking pictures of the kids, should have taken pics of a dog running and jumping around, or birds from your place, and whatnot, as those need the high shutter speeds on which you really didn't show the performance.

    • @BeastyBite
      @BeastyBite 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I think his hole joke was to use kids instead of animals because they randomly run, jump and role around like athletes or... animals xD

    • @Xogirlproductions
      @Xogirlproductions ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Valid point! I was looking for its sport performance more than anything

  • @gerardpatten5302
    @gerardpatten5302 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really good review!! Thanks Jared! Tell Brandon I said hello. Have been doing business with them for a long time! I don’t think you could go wrong for $949.

  • @gr33nDestiny
    @gr33nDestiny 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do the G Master lenses make a big difference on the higher resolution cameras. If you show us an eye at 1:1 at minimum focus will good idea imho Thankyou for vids

  • @user-mt1um8dt8g
    @user-mt1um8dt8g 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are they gonna make version of this lens for canon mirrorless?
    And if so - does its fit to the eos m mont?

  • @guirireyes
    @guirireyes 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can use a 2x extender on that to get 800mm? That's just wondering... But...
    Why not ALWAYS have a polarizer filter in outdoors photography?

  • @ConnorSmithBirch
    @ConnorSmithBirch 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    finally!! no other 100-400 in this price range for e mount

  • @GarageKing
    @GarageKing 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wonder how this is for video?? How good would it be on an A7C?

  • @trevor_osborn
    @trevor_osborn 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    cant decide on this or the Sony E 70-350mm for my a7iii. I know it crops but I want it for hard NZ hunting trip and 90% video. Weight is the only reason I think for the choice?

  • @rsstnnr76
    @rsstnnr76 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your hair is amazing. The review was pretty good too. 👍

  • @TheHappyWhisk
    @TheHappyWhisk 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    "Why am I the outta focus guy?" Ha! Also funny Peter Brady moment with the voice. All that was missing was you singing that song they did in the show. For this lens, no for me but that's because I shoot indoor food BUT I am super interested in Sigmas 16mm, 30mm and 56mm package deal for my Canon M50 (starter camera sure, but I LOVE it). Any chances of you do reviews on those? I know you did an M50 guide, than you buy the way, that was a super helpful video. So I figured I'd ask if you could do a review on the other Sigmas or, if I missed it and you already did, please direct me to said video. Thanks, Ivy.

  • @Malbeck82
    @Malbeck82 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Jared! i have one question,i have the Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM with Sony a7 III and i use it with Mc11 Sigma,what you think about these two lenses? i was thinking to replace the Canon with this Sigma but first i want to know if the differences are significative,thanks if you reply

  • @EmoEmu
    @EmoEmu 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nice. There's no way I'm paying what Sony is asking for the GM, but this one I'll consider getting.

  • @sb3213
    @sb3213 4 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    I'm sad I didn't hear: LLLLLLLLL MOOOOUUUUNNNNT AAALLLLIAAANNCEE!

    • @Vamp898
      @Vamp898 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      When he first used that, he was so making fun of it but with every video he is releasing when he uses that, he is less sure if it really is appropriate.
      I highly doubt he'll ever ditch his Sony for an L-Mount Camera (if he's going to switch, it will be most likely Canon or Nikon), but Panasonic and SIGMA did earn some respect with their L-Mount releases. The lenses are all awesome, one better than the other and the cameras released so far haven't been perfect, but not worse than what the competitors offer, just different.

  • @ItsPinecone_911
    @ItsPinecone_911 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Skittles is my favorite preset of all of them. Excellent starting point for my photos before tweaking.

  • @madmike2881
    @madmike2881 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    love it, love it, gotta have it!

  • @studiotessellate
    @studiotessellate 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi, I just got this lens a week ago and I am noticing that the autofocus when shooting in video mode is veeeery slow compared when shooting photos. I mainly do videos and this seems to be an issue for me. I tried it both on my a7iii and a6600 and had the same experience. Have you had similar issues? I also haven't updated the firmware of the lens from 1.0 to 2.0 since I have to ship the lens for that. Thanks!

  • @rutaemilija8653
    @rutaemilija8653 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I did get kind of nostalgic about Philly from when I lived there for a while though. Getting emotional over a few buildings

  • @ECUAWARRIOR
    @ECUAWARRIOR 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love your videos

  • @1Know1tHurts
    @1Know1tHurts 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Holy Moly! I've been dreaming about Sony 200-600 but it is way too expensive for me. This lens, on the hand, might be IT. Thanks, Jared, your reviews are the best.

    • @stacylynn2187
      @stacylynn2187 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Sigma is porting their Sigma 60-600mm F4,5-6,3 DG OS HSM Sports to the E-Mount. Just need to be patient...

    • @madsurvivers
      @madsurvivers 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@stacylynn2187 cant wait for that lens in e mount

    • @1Know1tHurts
      @1Know1tHurts 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@stacylynn2187 Seriously? Damn, I just bought a bicycle. Hopefully, I will be able to save fast enough for one of these lenses. Thanks a lot for letting me know.

  • @RevUnstableBoy
    @RevUnstableBoy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I totally forgot to use the /fro link when I bought my lens this week... oops. next time (sigma 150-600 btw)

  • @Mike-fs3bv
    @Mike-fs3bv 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    If I did not already have the GMaster 100-400, this would be on my to buy list.

  • @justinrstone
    @justinrstone 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wish someone would drop a 100-400 for the Z mount. Read that Tamron is working on it. Not sure if I should just get an F mount one and deal with the adapter or wait... I hate waiting.

  • @wd9274
    @wd9274 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Glad you brought up its not a good sports lens indoors!
    Need to find a quality e-mount sports lens for indoors

  • @Axonteer
    @Axonteer 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    i own a vari aperture f4-5.6 from canon 70-300mm L IS and yes i also own the 70-200 f2.8 IS II(bought second hand) and i totally can see the appeal - thanks to fro's review i bought the sigma 150-600 and im loving it but it is indeed not something you casually take with you - same goes for the 70-200 if i whip it out its on purpose (say when my company asks me to take pictures of our x-mas dinner, when we go on hikes i wouldnt probably take it with me ;-) ) and thats why i love the 70-300 its handy enough that you can carry it in your hand for a 2h walk easily, its a nice range and with some manouvering allows also closer things to be pictured so... i guess 70-300 is just the version for larger stuff close up compared to the 100-400 ;-) / actually before i owned the 200 i shot with the 300 lense a motocross event and thanks to the way the track was layed out on a slight slope, i had very good background separation - eventhough the drivers where at least 10-20m away from me in cases. Would the 200 have been better for motion and blur? YES! but did it matter? Actually yes because my cam has "only" 26mp and if i had to crop in another 100 the picture would probably end up at a much lower resolution.

  • @SuperSparky360
    @SuperSparky360 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Did anyone notice Juliana’s shoes were on backwards? 14:06

    • @KenMyers
      @KenMyers 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I would say the wrong foot. If they were pointing backwards she would be screaming like crazy.

    • @dalerobinson8456
      @dalerobinson8456 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      So were her brothers, his legs are crossed.

  • @RedDeivid
    @RedDeivid 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I need to ask this question, is that noise at 200-400 ISO normal on the A7RIV?? Or is it something about the lens? I mean I do own a A7RII and haven't seen that much noise on a picture took with that light conditions and that ISO values, so if it's because of the lenses I'll save the money and get the 70-200 f4 from sony or the 70-180 2.8 from tamron. Thanks!

  • @FourCokebog19
    @FourCokebog19 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do you know how it compares to the 70-200 f2.8 with the 2x teleconverter? Its basicly is a 140-400 f5.6 then

  • @johnisntmyrealname2143
    @johnisntmyrealname2143 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Jared do you know how this compares to the MC-11 + Sigma 150-600mm? I wouldn't mind the extra reach for birding, but if the sigma natively for e-mount is going to be more responsive I'd consider it.

    • @firasvanwaterschoot4059
      @firasvanwaterschoot4059 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The 100-400 is probably going to have more responsive autofocus since it’s native and designed for mirrorless cameras

  • @dhaniel07
    @dhaniel07 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi Jared, which one do you prefer? Sigma 100-400 or Tamron 150-500?

  • @littletweeter1327
    @littletweeter1327 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    100-400 is a fantastic range. i use the newer canon 100-400L and its phenomenal

  • @zteam24
    @zteam24 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is on the hot shoe mount when he is shooting in the everglades?

  • @scoobywrx05dw
    @scoobywrx05dw 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I use this lens canon ef mount on the mc11 with my a7r2 and it is a great combo. Pretty sharp lens for the price.

  • @davidecastagno3607
    @davidecastagno3607 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    2:39 had me dying😂

  • @domingojlrn
    @domingojlrn 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    any word if it will it work with sony teleconverters?

  • @StefCarle
    @StefCarle 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do you think that they’re going to built a 70-200mm f2.8 dg e-mount sigma art for Sony e-mounts ?

  • @ariannedunlap1781
    @ariannedunlap1781 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    i have a sony nex-6 and just bought this lens. my camera will not recognize it. it recognizes all my other e mount lenses. am i doing something wrong or is there a problem with the lens? thanks!

  • @GabrielGGabGattringer
    @GabrielGGabGattringer 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    AWESOME! Perfect fpr plane-/helicopterspotting! 400mm is what I need cause the Sony Sel 55-210mm (315 mm equivalent) gets too short on my Sony A6300 to be honest!

    • @jessharvey9787
      @jessharvey9787 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I have the same camera - sony a6300. Did you end up getting this lens? Will it work okay with the a6300. Looks great to build on a mid range price range set for wildlife photography!

  • @wilkaiba
    @wilkaiba 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Sigma is very good at marketing! This lens has so much potential... except for night photography. Tried setting up my tripod and take photos of a waxing gibbous moon. Lens is so damn heavy without the tripod collar. My camera tripod foot was not balanced enough. Sigma got us!

  • @TheAndroidvsapple
    @TheAndroidvsapple 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I have the Sony FE 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 G OSS since a while.
    Love it!!!

    • @mikldude9376
      @mikldude9376 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That looks like a handy lens and a good price too .

    • @thebinpustey6497
      @thebinpustey6497 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I was going to pick up that 70-300 (used) next month. Tempting to wait for the Sigma..! In Canada it would be like, $8000 tho!

    • @sihill1989
      @sihill1989 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      It should be lighter than Sigma so it will be a better travel companion. I wonder about image quality out of 70-300, there is slow amount of reviews available on TH-cam.

    • @michaelmillward8006
      @michaelmillward8006 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@sihill1989 i have the 70-300 G ( fir about 2 years) and I'd recommended it over any other mid range zoom made for Sony E. Its much under rated but a great travel lens as its pretty light too. Image quality is good in my opinion. Better than the 70-200 f4 which im selling now as its no longer needed.

    • @sihill1989
      @sihill1989 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Michael Millward thank you. I’ve ordered 70-300 few days back and waiting for delivery. I find this new sigma interesting and figuring out whether I should keep Sony on arrival or send it back. In the end I can stay with Sony and change later on if needed.

  • @lorenzo4262
    @lorenzo4262 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello, in many ,says that autofocus for sports Is not so reliable and Quick.. how do you feel this Lens for sports (for example rugby when players run towards you?

  • @MickeyKodak
    @MickeyKodak 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have the 80-400 Nikor and thats surprisingly very well workin...on Z7 even better.
    If i had A Sony i find other Lenses .
    This is for Bright light

  • @h-dawg969
    @h-dawg969 ปีที่แล้ว

    As we’re going into winter, I really want to try and photograph the surfers and Kitesurfers once we get the big Atlantic swells.
    I was looking at the Tamrom 150-500 but I dunno if that’s over kill or not.
    What would you or others recommend between that and this? If I was rich and money wasn’t an issue I’d get the Sony 200-600, but I think it’s well too much money as it’s not something that would get use day to day.
    Would this Signa 100-400 suffice for the surfer images, and maybe the occasional birds etc? Or is the Tamron 159-500 the way to go?
    It’s one or the other.

  • @OldSchoolDudeGaming
    @OldSchoolDudeGaming 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have never seen such a hilariously entertaining review for something as boring as lenses. Had my attention the whole time. Subbed!

  • @benec5816
    @benec5816 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    looks awesome be great in a Canon M series ha thanks for another great reveiw stay safe

  • @niekperdaems
    @niekperdaems 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is the full production model better then this pre- production model? Do you know ? What about speed on the A1 ?

  • @tomslittlecorner
    @tomslittlecorner 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great review:)

  • @christopher5878
    @christopher5878 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Im looking for some advice on what lense to buy. i´ve got a sony a7iii with a sony f4 24-105 and want to get a second lens. i cant decide between the 100-400mm in this video or a sigma 70-200mm f 2.8. Any suggestions or advice?

    • @olivierwhite2451
      @olivierwhite2451 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      This probably comes in late but generally its a good idea to first see of you like the zoom range and when needed you can also go for faster glass