Which Is Better at Coding? ChatGPT or Copilot Pro For Programming Comparison
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ม.ค. 2024
- Let's compare ChatGPT and Copilot Pro in coding tasks, evaluating which tool offers better functionality for programmers. Focusing on custom instructions, context understanding, file attachment capabilities, and the quality of code output, ChatGPT emerges as the preferred choice for its superior performance in these areas.
SUBSCRIBE for more! 👉 bit.ly/3zlUmiS 👈
automate everything. 👇
linktr.ee/webcafe
Corbin ai Newsletter [FREE] ☕
aitraining.webcafeai.com/joinus
How to use ChatGPT to write code
Can ChatGPT replace programmers? What programming languages does ChatGPT know?
www.zdnet.com/article/how-to-...
Microsoft unveils a slew of Copilot updates, including Copilot Pro. Here's what's new
www.zdnet.com/article/microso...
Key Takeaways:
✩ Custom Instructions: ChatGPT's ability to follow detailed, custom instructions allows for more tailored coding solutions compared to Copilot Pro.
✩ Context Length: ChatGPT's superior handling of longer context lengths ensures better continuity and understanding in coding projects.
✩ File Attachment: The feature to attach files with ChatGPT enhances its utility, making it more versatile for complex programming tasks.
-------------------------------------------------
➤ Follow @webcafeai
• 🐦 Twitter: / webcafeai
• 🏂 TikTok: / webcafeai
• 🦙 Instagram: / webcafeai
-------------------------------------------------
▼ Extra Links of Interest:
🤖 AI Courses
aitraining.webcafeai.com/store
😃 Talk With Me
www.cameo.com/corbinai
💰 Earn 50% Commission on Webcafe Software: webcafesoftware.bixgrow.com/r...
💬 AI Automation Workshop [FREE]
aitraining.webcafeai.com/Free...
0:23 - Comparing ChatGPT and Copilot Pro
2:30 - Addressing styling preferences in ChatGPT
3:35 - Avoid assumptions for smoother workflow
5:10 - Comparing code outputs: ChatGPT vs. Copilot Pro
7:33 - Exploring ChatGPT's outputs and capabilities
9:29 - Leveraging files in ChatGPT for coding insights
10:48 - Conclusion and recommendations for using ChatGPT
My name is Corbin, an AI developer entrepreneur behind the vision of Webcafe AI. Together we will build digital ecosystems.
Navigate to key moments👇
made via tubestamp.com
0:23 - Comparing ChatGPT and Copilot Pro
2:30 - Addressing styling preferences in ChatGPT
3:35 - Avoid assumptions for smoother workflow
5:10 - Comparing code outputs: ChatGPT vs. Copilot Pro
7:33 - Exploring ChatGPT's outputs and capabilities
9:29 - Leveraging files in ChatGPT for coding insights
10:48 - Conclusion and recommendations for using ChatGPT
Recap by TubeStamp ✏️
You need to use copilot within an IDE like vscode to be able to evaluate it.
What did you mean by this sentence? For me, copilot could only make corrections in vscode, but it could never write code.
Great idea on using the Custom Instructions for this specific purpose.
Now in Copilot Pro there is "Notebook", which has a context window of 18000
Hi! Can you explain more of these gesture, please?
Is there a message limit on copilot pro?
ChatGPT 4o is years ahead at the moment
The context window is *huge*. I was tempted to switch to Claude before GPT-4 released the 128k context window last fall (7:55). I like being able to cut-and-past 2-3 files and ask it to generate another that leverages the types & functions from what I cut-and-pasted. Then I can use the same chat for a few hours to improve the chance that it remembers a useful function it used before. However I expected copilot to be better because of its VS Code integration...but maybe this has changed since it became more of a Microsoft product than a Github product.
please for all developers what is the best AI you use on the market??
What do you think about no code as a starter for an MVP just to get the ball rolling then create something more specialized with your own proprietary code as your company gets bigger?
I would say, long term, invest in learning how to build from scratch. At first, this may seem more difficult, but the payoff will be much larger long term.
This market is only around 9 months old now; therefore, take the time to begin now to learn how to code and leverage ChatGPT to help.
It took me 3 months and 1,000+ hours to build my MVP for Tubestamp.
Now this year, it has become clear to me how to add a bunch of value and keep growing.
@@webcafeai modular code is hell for the ADHD mind. That's why I started on BASIC.
Great video! And as a Co-pilot enjoyer I agree it has limits and bugs so I think you werre perfectly fair and gives some reason for people to still use ChatGPT over Co-Pilot.
Thanks!
What about ChatGPT compared to Github Copilot?
Have you made a video about that?
No, but I can definitely look into creating a video on that topic!
@@webcafeai That would be really cool.
Thanks 😊
Thanks good one. Would love to see ChatGPT against Google Gemini for programming
I have used both at the same time, Gemini advanced is still far for useful in programming
@@jerry27syd Did you mean to say "far from useful"?
I honestly prefer Copilot than Chatgpt:
1. With copilot I can browse side by side on Edge browser and use copilot at same time on the right side.
2. Long context is good & bad for programming. Good because it remembers stuff. Bad because it can make assumptions overtime. Better ask it to generate some snippets than an entire page. I work in Python.
3. I can quickly land on a webpage and ask Copilot to get me a summary which doing on Chatgpt take few more steps.
4. Tones on Copilot gives me more freedom choosing type of responded on how to be often at times w/o asking it manually to set tone.
5. I'm a researcher, so often times I need my AI assistant to quote me references based on which it is saying on the fly.
at 3:56: proceed so everything i just say is can or can't be done with copilot?
I noticed that as well... Then he goes on to say if you are going to use chat gpt please learn how to use it as he doesnt understand something as simple as temperatures and picks precise to get the worst output. I personally would say both are junk, and anyone who wants to code with ai seriously should use the API. But value for 20/month copilot is pretty dang nice if you use the office suite for work. Copilot can access content and context through Microsoft Graph, including user documents, emails, calendar, chats, meetings, and contacts which he also misstated in this video. People just drop crap on youtube without wanting to spend 5 min researching the topic.
@@TheJmac82 What do you mean use the API? You mean like google gemini API or open AI api? You mean use the AIs directly instead of through a chat bot right?
@@Stryker-K Yes, when you tune them for your use case they do much MUCH better. Also if there is an option of Creative vs Precise you always want to use Creative. Well at least for coding.
The code instruction: "Begin with a one-sentence summary of the main goal for clarity. I appreciate concise, step-by-step instructions tailored to the specific code or files I'm currently working on. Please provide code snippets or configurations that are directly relevant to Visual Studio Code, macOS, React, Firebase. When referencing external resources or suggesting solutions, consider the context provided about my project, its current state, expanded functionalities, and Firebase integrations. Before providing any step-by-step instructions, first ask for clarification on the specific updates or changes I'd like to make. Avoid making assumptions about installed packages or completed steps unless explicitly mentioned."
What about GitHub Copilot though?
Yeah this is a better choice to compare imo, would love to see a follow up!
Hugging face chat is my favorite
This video is biased and misleading. It does not provide a fair and objective comparison of ChatGPT and Copilot Pro. It only shows the cases where ChatGPT performs better, but ignores the cases where Copilot Pro excels. It also does not mention the limitations and drawbacks of ChatGPT, such as its lack of integration with IDEs, its inconsistency and unreliability in code generation, and its potential ethical and legal issues. On the other hand, it downplays the advantages and features of Copilot Pro, such as its faster and more stable performance, its compatibility with Microsoft 365 apps, and its ability to create images with AI. This video is clearly trying to promote ChatGPT over Copilot Pro, without giving the viewers a balanced and informed perspective. I suggest you do your own research and try both tools yourself before making a decision. Don’t trust this video. It is not a credible source of information.
This is purely a programming capability comparison though. Granted it is on React and Firebase, but still it is a specific use case.
I’m sure copilot can be useful not having to copy and paste shit into it a million times but gpt 4 feels more balanced. You can set up a prompt so it doesn’t respond with paragraphs and use it to get a good idea where YOU want to take the project. Copilot is just slowly taking the wheel and you don’t even notice until you’re trying to find a bug in 3000 lines of code that looks like it should work 😭
Gpt is bettet
Thats because you dont have any clue how chatgpt 4 works 😂
gosh, did my (on topic) comment get censored?
Copilot Pro allows 18000 input, and with 128k context, I find it far more useful than ChatGPT.
Copilot you cant GPT mention another GPT and do web search. Imagine youre going from brainstorming to coding to searching web for updated docs to saving the conversation in yout google drive.
ChatGPT is the ultimate tool