Doctor Daniel Sheehan the physicist should really have a spiritual discussion with Doctor Daniel Sheehan the lawyer on multidimensional reality intrusions formerly known as UFOs. That would be immensely fascinating especially as far as the subject of synchronicity is concerned.
My experiences heavily suggest that whenever you act on information about the future it's the equivalent of measuring/interacting with a wave/particle, so you cannot use future information to then erase the future information. This also can be seen as a means to preserve causality, despite interacting with future information. In short, this means that you could not have learned about your brother's accident and then used that information to avoid the event. Some events can have degrees of freedom to influence how the events evolve, but many events do not (such as sudden, quick accidents). In the case where there are no degrees of freedom you can STILL get future information, BUT, it will be vague and thus lack the utility to avoid whatever event the information is about. I call this Passive Precognition. Nature seems to judge that you would prefer some information rather than no information, despite its lack of utility. That's what you appear to have received, Dr. Sheehan. I did email on this topic this week. Thanks and good luck.
I suggest that Time is a compactified dimension one single Planck second in size. This is why there is no motion in time. This is why there are energetic limits of lambda and event horizon. This is why the closure/ reconnection happens at event horizons. This is why there is conservation at all. Because we are closed in the present moment. Using Kuramoto synchrony we can evolve a hyperplane of the present with matter on one side and antimatter on the other. Though in fact, since when we push particles beyond infinity they invert, these two regions of matter and antimatter must in fact be connected. At event horizons.
It's a presupposition to say that the photon went through both slits, however we only ever detect it in one location. This detail is important to understand, in order to not jump to conclusions or presuppositions.
I used to work at USD and had met Dr Sheehan many years ago. I think he may have told me the story about his precognitive experience. So perhaps I already asked him why he thinks that his brother's death could have been avoided since wouldn't the same problem occur as with time travel - the consistency paradox? I have had a number of precognitive experiences - they seem useless, tbh.
If the beam of light travels a light year before the slot-screen shutters shut, how does this ‘change history’ along the travel path when it only resolves at very end?
I'm halfway through and I really hope he explains how he thinks the future was shown to him. I've had this happen to me and that has sent me on an endless search for how it could be
I've had precognition for years since a child, though in surges with long spans of nothing, so it's off and on. But overall there has been enough volume to map out how it appears to work. I am just moving toward publishing after finally working it out (as much as possible), and am looking to work with people. He is right that the brain has access to quantum information. He is also right that there is a mechanism to filter out and recognize meaningful events. I don't see any of the current quantum interpretations as being part of how it works though. All I see is a simple probability rule that allows nature to project the evolution of the same current system two ways, probabilistically (every possible evolution) and deterministically (one evolution given the current state). That's it. It's simple. The systems can swap between those two modes as circumstances allow. There are basic rules regarding the information, the big one being you cannot use future event information to completely erase the future event. That simple picture (it's a tad more complicated but not by much) took 7-8 years of work and 274 pages.
For a profound in depth explanation on retro-causation, consciousness and quantum mechanics see ‘A Brief Guide To Life, Consciousness And Other Quantum Wackiness’ by I A Gill
I read Eric Wargo's book (Time Loops) last year - enjoyed the book great stories and exaplations and he to referenced Wheeler's 'Delayed Choice' hypothesis. All good until I saw Sabine Hossenfelder's TH-cam video th-cam.com/video/RQv5CVELG3U/w-d-xo.html where she claims to have debunked the delayed choice. So does Sabine have a point?
Yes. The key thing is to understand each step in the sequence and what happens at each step. You cannot scramble which-path info and then successfully claim you reestablished it later after it's been scrambled, because whatever you do have afterward has nothing to do with the pre-scrambled state. Wheeler I dont think did the erasing/unerasing part, just the delayed choice bit.
Lol so ignore Bell's locality, shhhh don't talk about it, But Retrocausality Wooooooo yeeeees arrrrrlright, but the retro results I had seen were a misread of the experiment results! The quantum Eraser experiment results were: Bob isn’t really rewriting the past. He’s filtering Alice’s results in a way that’s difficult to follow because it’s after the fact, it’s essentially using a coincidence counter, and it’s not any random two-way choice but a decision to maintain or lose the correlation. But some very interesting ideas here, might lead to some exciting times! ⌛⏱⏳⏰
Doctor Daniel Sheehan the physicist should really have a spiritual discussion with Doctor Daniel Sheehan the lawyer on multidimensional reality intrusions formerly known as UFOs. That would be immensely fascinating especially as far as the subject of synchronicity is concerned.
I was looking for the other Daniel and stumbled on this. It really is interesting that both these fascinating people share the same name
@@MM-hq2bd I think it's an Irish thing. If you're a male Sheehan you basically have to be a Danny Boy, too.
My experiences heavily suggest that whenever you act on information about the future it's the equivalent of measuring/interacting with a wave/particle, so you cannot use future information to then erase the future information. This also can be seen as a means to preserve causality, despite interacting with future information. In short, this means that you could not have learned about your brother's accident and then used that information to avoid the event. Some events can have degrees of freedom to influence how the events evolve, but many events do not (such as sudden, quick accidents). In the case where there are no degrees of freedom you can STILL get future information, BUT, it will be vague and thus lack the utility to avoid whatever event the information is about. I call this Passive Precognition. Nature seems to judge that you would prefer some information rather than no information, despite its lack of utility. That's what you appear to have received, Dr. Sheehan. I did email on this topic this week. Thanks and good luck.
Beings of the beyond successfully use future information for attacking us and manipulating the event. In such case you have no chance to escape.
I suggest that Time is a compactified dimension one single Planck second in size.
This is why there is no motion in time.
This is why there are energetic limits of lambda and event horizon.
This is why the closure/ reconnection happens at event horizons.
This is why there is conservation at all. Because we are closed in the present moment.
Using Kuramoto synchrony we can evolve a hyperplane of the present with matter on one side and antimatter on the other.
Though in fact, since when we push particles beyond infinity they invert, these two regions of matter and antimatter must in fact be connected.
At event horizons.
It's a presupposition to say that the photon went through both slits, however we only ever detect it in one location. This detail is important to understand, in order to not jump to conclusions or presuppositions.
very good catalyst, ty
The present in the interference pattern caused by the collision of the past and the future.
Eureka!
I used to work at USD and had met Dr Sheehan many years ago. I think he may have told me the story about his precognitive experience. So perhaps I already asked him why he thinks that his brother's death could have been avoided since wouldn't the same problem occur as with time travel - the consistency paradox? I have had a number of precognitive experiences - they seem useless, tbh.
If the beam of light travels a light year before the slot-screen shutters shut, how does this ‘change history’ along the travel path when it only resolves at very end?
You got my attention...
I'm halfway through and I really hope he explains how he thinks the future was shown to him. I've had this happen to me and that has sent me on an endless search for how it could be
I've had precognition for years since a child, though in surges with long spans of nothing, so it's off and on. But overall there has been enough volume to map out how it appears to work. I am just moving toward publishing after finally working it out (as much as possible), and am looking to work with people. He is right that the brain has access to quantum information. He is also right that there is a mechanism to filter out and recognize meaningful events. I don't see any of the current quantum interpretations as being part of how it works though. All I see is a simple probability rule that allows nature to project the evolution of the same current system two ways, probabilistically (every possible evolution) and deterministically (one evolution given the current state). That's it. It's simple. The systems can swap between those two modes as circumstances allow. There are basic rules regarding the information, the big one being you cannot use future event information to completely erase the future event. That simple picture (it's a tad more complicated but not by much) took 7-8 years of work and 274 pages.
@@neilhopwoodsjugband do you have a link to your work?
For a profound in depth explanation on retro-causation, consciousness and quantum mechanics see ‘A Brief Guide To Life, Consciousness And Other Quantum Wackiness’ by I A Gill
I read Eric Wargo's book (Time Loops) last year - enjoyed the book great stories and exaplations and he to referenced Wheeler's 'Delayed Choice' hypothesis. All good until I saw Sabine Hossenfelder's TH-cam video th-cam.com/video/RQv5CVELG3U/w-d-xo.html where she claims to have debunked the delayed choice. So does Sabine have a point?
Yes. The key thing is to understand each step in the sequence and what happens at each step. You cannot scramble which-path info and then successfully claim you reestablished it later after it's been scrambled, because whatever you do have afterward has nothing to do with the pre-scrambled state. Wheeler I dont think did the erasing/unerasing part, just the delayed choice bit.
Don't confuse history with the past. History can be revised the past is the present after it has been destroyed .
So chill your perishables in the oven, and cook meals in the fridge.
Lol so ignore Bell's locality, shhhh don't talk about it, But Retrocausality Wooooooo yeeeees arrrrrlright, but the retro results I had seen were a misread of the experiment results!
The quantum Eraser experiment results were:
Bob isn’t really rewriting the past. He’s filtering Alice’s results in a way that’s difficult to follow because it’s after the fact, it’s essentially using a coincidence counter, and it’s not any random two-way choice but a decision to maintain or lose the correlation.
But some very interesting ideas here, might lead to some exciting times! ⌛⏱⏳⏰