Dr. Manzoor Sahib uses DraviRis (Dravidians) @12:45, 13:26, 16:56 and Malukhha @9:58 people interchangeably, which is very confusing for the audiences. Then @20:13, he clarifies that HaRappan were Malukhha and DraviRis were South Indians. In an earlier video he mentions Malukhha were the original inhabitants of HaRappa civilization and DraviRis came later from Iran? Need to make it clear; were the DraviRi originally settled in the South only or they were part of HaRappa civilization also?
This was a great knowledgeable video. Thank you for making this video. But i got a question that Sir Manzur Ji said in his previous videos that The concept of religion was developed by Dravidians because agriculture depends more on natural resources than animal husbandry. But in this video he is saying that Aryans developed religion
HaRappans had a belief system (but NOT an organized religion) of controlling the nature with ghostly entities and what later called Tantarvad. No concept of gods. Aryan brought the abstract concepts of gods and made it as an organized religion. This organizational structure reached at its peak with Brahmanism where tracking of gods, asking any grant from them, offering and the knowledge about these gods were restricted and guarded by the Brahman exclusively. At least that is what I understood.
Sir how can you just refer Parmanand and Thripati and then come to the conclusion that your point is proved? They were also writers like yourself. You must inquire what was their source of information and how much it's worth accepting. Do you think that just mentioning some book of a writer from 50 or 100 years back is enough? Is exploring history that simple?
Please do more extensive research on languages and tribes of Punjab. The literature sources you are using are all written by Hindu-supremacists. They all spread propaganda about Brahmins supremacy as the real Aryans even-though Y-DNA studies have clearly shown that Jatt's, Rajputs, Gujjars, Arain and other ethnic tribes or biradri's of Punjab have double the amount of Aryan DNA than Brahmins do. Also there was no @25:28 Sanskrit during Vedic times. There were only local vernaculars called Prakrit's from which Punjabi has descended. One proof is that both Prakrit and Punjabi are Tonal while Sanskrit is not. Sanskrit came much much later and was composed/formalized by Panini. Sanskrit was meant to be the language of intelligentsia and local people languages were looked down upon and called Prakrit's which literally means vulgar. Just a request, please use some credible literature sources to dig the history of Punjab rather than than Hindu Brahmin writers. Otherwise a good series. Thanks you!
An article quoting different studies: www.brownpundits.com/2019/01/10/are-haryana-jats-the-closest-living-descendents-of-our-vedic-forefathers/ Latest genetic study on Harappa: www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(19)30967-5
![เปิดใจ "อาจารย์เบียร์ คนตื่นธรรม" อดีตเคยสุดทุกทาง ถ้าใช้หนี้หมดไปบวชแน่ l [Nickynachat]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IxeE0xVhy08/mqdefault.jpg)
Bahot dilchasp gallan
ਮੈਂ ਲਗਭਗ ਪੂਰੀ ਗੱਲਬਾਤ ਨਾਲ ਸਹਿਮਤ ਹਾਂ, ਸਗੋਂ ਇਸ ਨੂੰ ਹੋਰ ਵੀ ਜਾਨਣ ਲਈ ਉਤਸੁਕ ਹਾਂ ਕਿਉਂਕਿ ਮੇਰੀ ਸਮਝ ਦਾ ਨਿਚੋੜ ਵੀ ਇੰਜ ਦਾ ਹੀ ਹੈ।
Outstanding information
Dr saab att karai jandey oh, sirra bai g
Amazing information 👍🏽
Mash’llah
Sir what about brahmanwad how it started
Dr. Manzoor Sahib uses DraviRis (Dravidians) @12:45, 13:26, 16:56 and Malukhha @9:58 people interchangeably, which is very confusing for the audiences. Then @20:13, he clarifies that HaRappan were Malukhha and DraviRis were South Indians. In an earlier video he mentions Malukhha were the original inhabitants of HaRappa civilization and DraviRis came later from Iran? Need to make it clear; were the DraviRi originally settled in the South only or they were part of HaRappa civilization also?
ڈاکٹر صاحب کی کتاب کا نام کیا ھے پنجاب کی تاریخ پہ لکھی ھوئی؟
excellent
This was a great knowledgeable video. Thank you for making this video.
But i got a question that Sir Manzur Ji said in his previous videos that The concept of religion was developed by Dravidians because agriculture depends more on natural resources than animal husbandry.
But in this video he is saying that Aryans developed religion
HaRappans had a belief system (but NOT an organized religion) of controlling the nature with ghostly entities and what later called Tantarvad. No concept of gods. Aryan brought the abstract concepts of gods and made it as an organized religion. This organizational structure reached at its peak with Brahmanism where tracking of gods, asking any grant from them, offering and the knowledge about these gods were restricted and guarded by the Brahman exclusively. At least that is what I understood.
This is a very good informative program. Unfortunately, I find presentation is very poor.
Aryans are fighters and also wild but harrapns are creative and genius at that time..
There were three group of Aryan tribes one went to Europe 2nd to Iran 3rd India.
Sir how can you just refer Parmanand and Thripati and then come to the
conclusion that your point is proved? They were also writers like yourself.
You must inquire what was their source of information and how much it's
worth accepting. Do you think that just mentioning some book of a writer
from 50 or 100 years back is enough? Is exploring history that simple?
Please do more extensive research on languages and tribes of Punjab. The literature sources you are using are all written by Hindu-supremacists. They all spread propaganda about Brahmins supremacy as the real Aryans even-though Y-DNA studies have clearly shown that Jatt's, Rajputs, Gujjars, Arain and other ethnic tribes or biradri's of Punjab have double the amount of Aryan DNA than Brahmins do.
Also there was no @25:28 Sanskrit during Vedic times. There were only local vernaculars called Prakrit's from which Punjabi has descended. One proof is that both Prakrit and Punjabi are Tonal while Sanskrit is not.
Sanskrit came much much later and was composed/formalized by Panini. Sanskrit was meant to be the language of intelligentsia and local people languages were looked down upon and called Prakrit's which literally means vulgar. Just a request, please use some credible literature sources to dig the history of Punjab rather than than Hindu Brahmin writers. Otherwise a good series. Thanks you!
An article quoting different studies:
www.brownpundits.com/2019/01/10/are-haryana-jats-the-closest-living-descendents-of-our-vedic-forefathers/
Latest genetic study on Harappa: www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(19)30967-5
If you listen carefully, i guess there is no conflict.
Dravidian aur chandal/asuran Ka koi relation ni hai. Dravidians me bhi Charon caste varan hote hai, aur asur chandal sirf mythology hai