The Ancient History of Carthage - The Ascent of Civilization - Full Historical Documentary

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 มิ.ย. 2024
  • The Carthaginians’ story began around 3,000 years ago when settlers left their homes in what is now Lebanon to set up new colonies around the Mediterranean. The most splendid and powerful of these settlements was Carthage, a bustling Metropolis in what is now Tunisia with a port that was the envy of the entire world.
    --
    Welcome to the official Get.factual youtube channel! 🌍
    We are a documentary streaming channel covering history, science, technology, and nature. Explore worlds distant, forgotten, and unknown; from the depths of ocean trenches to the far reaches of the cosmos.
    New uploads of full-length documentaries and docu-series every week!
    Subscribe here: bit.ly/GetfactualSUB
  • บันเทิง

ความคิดเห็น • 232

  • @fadimelki6248
    @fadimelki6248 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Great video! You have honored the Lebanese people, Phoenicians, the founders, and ancestors of Carthage! Great job on showing the influence and legacy of our tiny nation.

  • @davidsaade5213
    @davidsaade5213 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    A proud Tunisian is a proud Carthaginian 🇹🇳

  • @hbneye2770
    @hbneye2770 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    As a Tunisian (from Tunis, where the leftovers of Carthage are nowadays ) I approve of this great documentary 🥹 thank you.

  • @connorhauss6044
    @connorhauss6044 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    One of the very few videos of Carthage that actually go into more aspects than just war

  • @marouanbouzidi6422
    @marouanbouzidi6422 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Amazing!!
    The Carthaginian were so advanced and ahead of their time

  • @alejandrosakai1744
    @alejandrosakai1744 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Ancient Carthage was one of Antiquity's great cultures too bad we know little or a full Carthaginian document or artwork! Greetings from Mexico!

  • @lernmor2137
    @lernmor2137 2 ปีที่แล้ว +119

    I am over 30 minutes in. No mention of Hannibal, elephants, or attempted sieges on Rome. This is an actual history documentary.

    • @felonious_c
      @felonious_c 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      I was so happy to see this comment first.

    • @Chris-qo2jx
      @Chris-qo2jx 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      About 46 minutes until Hannibal was mentioned.

    • @lernmor2137
      @lernmor2137 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@Chris-qo2jx I'll never recover from this

    • @alphaomarbarry6511
      @alphaomarbarry6511 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hanno the second betrayed the great general Hannibal Barca without Hanno the second there will be no Roman empire

    • @robertcronin6603
      @robertcronin6603 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yep.

  • @carvingtheway
    @carvingtheway 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Man I got tears by d end of d video... 🙏🏻

  • @brettcurtis5710
    @brettcurtis5710 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Nice to see Prof Richard Miles in this - his own 2-part doco on Carthage is a must-watch!

    • @philipwilliams2310
      @philipwilliams2310 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ..... Thanks for That tip Brett - (Richard Miles doc.,) 🌟🌟🌟👍
      Phil Liverpool UK 🇬🇧

  • @dietlindvonhohenwald448
    @dietlindvonhohenwald448 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I love these documentaries. So interesting and educational.

  • @stelladonaconfredobutler9459
    @stelladonaconfredobutler9459 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    thank you for a wonderful and insightful coverage of the mighty carthaginians 💫

  • @phillipstephens3079
    @phillipstephens3079 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Very well done…👍🏻👏🏻 Great script, great video quality, great focus on the subject, great tempo…..

  • @psacclose9823
    @psacclose9823 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    We have so much thanks to the Carthageninans.

  • @kiphood8145
    @kiphood8145 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Best Carthage doc yet 👍🏼👍🏼

  • @michael7324
    @michael7324 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    A great documentary. I enjoyed the cartoons as well. I learned a lot and thats what counts.

  • @hannah1943
    @hannah1943 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I so enjoyed that thank you so much

  • @Triondos
    @Triondos 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Amazing documentary 👏 ❤

  • @slimaneismailli8732
    @slimaneismailli8732 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    In my country, Morocco, 13 cities were built by the Phoenicians. Lixus in Larache are the ruins of a large city older than Carthage, 8th century BC. Only 15% has been dug up. These cities were Phoenician at first, then they became under the domination of Carthage

    • @aiurea1
      @aiurea1 ปีที่แล้ว

      Do you call yourselves Arabs? Maybe it should be Arabic.

    • @slimaneismailli8732
      @slimaneismailli8732 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@aiurea1 the Arabic language is only the simplest language among the ancient Semitic languages. it's like a standard. The English language shouldn't have been the same 200 years ago, and yet it's only 200 years old.

    • @aiurea1
      @aiurea1 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@slimaneismailli8732 how is it 200 years old only? I think you should stop calling yourselves arabs, you are different

    • @slimaneismailli8732
      @slimaneismailli8732 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@aiurea1 200 years about our times. I wanted to make you understand that the languages ​​are no longer quite the same over a short period of 200 years. so imagine periods of thousands of years. I am North African, and if you want to translate the writings on stelae, you must know Arabic and Libyan Berber. These languages ​​are Semitic but they are different. Thousands of years ago and yet they are cousins

    • @aiurea1
      @aiurea1 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@slimaneismailli8732 very intresting to hear that Berber is Semitic too

  • @phillipnoetzel7637
    @phillipnoetzel7637 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Richard Miles reminds me of that guy from Mitchel and Webb

  • @JudasPriestSUCKS
    @JudasPriestSUCKS 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Quality docu. Thanks

  • @sandranicolaysen
    @sandranicolaysen ปีที่แล้ว +2

    How amazing is this video!

  • @alinaananistor4736
    @alinaananistor4736 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    excellent documentary!

  • @Jw3sxu8fq4dh
    @Jw3sxu8fq4dh ปีที่แล้ว +3

    0:20 both The purple dye and the alphabets were invented by the Phoenicians. The Phoenicians established Carthage as a trading colony that was populated by people from Tyre, Lebanon

  • @Shineon83
    @Shineon83 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Of COURSE the Carthaginians practiced child sacrifice. This doc does mention the sheer NUMBER of infant bones & Stieles found in Carthaginian burial grounds-far, far more than would ever have naturally died….
    I just love these historians who adopt one “civilization” as their life’s work-they almost always lose perspective & skepticism, while falling in love with their subjects….

    • @abeddani992
      @abeddani992 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Bones are not a definitive answer that sacrifice did happen. Although I liked the 2nd paragraph you wrote, I tend to believe that we can't be sure if phoenicians/carthaginians did child sacrifice or not

  • @sarcasmo57
    @sarcasmo57 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I would love to go back and see them in their heyday.

  • @carvingtheway
    @carvingtheway 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Awesome video 🇱🇧🇱🇧🇱🇧🏔️💪🏻🥂

    • @isawwhatthedoghasdone2549
      @isawwhatthedoghasdone2549 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      you're not from Carthage boy

    • @carvingtheway
      @carvingtheway 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@isawwhatthedoghasdone2549 nop I'm not

    • @carvingtheway
      @carvingtheway 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@isawwhatthedoghasdone2549 but im Lebanese and Canaanite Phoenician toOo😎

  • @riannesalvarita8155
    @riannesalvarita8155 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    My wife's ancestors are celtic phoenicians from Cadiz and my father's side from Carthage

  • @annamosier1950
    @annamosier1950 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    found Roman coins near Tunis in caves on 1967 when we were there

  • @kw19193
    @kw19193 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    This is superb, so very well done especially in comparison to the ginormous amount of dreck concerning Carthage on TH-cam. Cheers!

    • @get.factual
      @get.factual  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks a lot!

    • @hannobaalii_makendalii
      @hannobaalii_makendalii ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@get.factual HANNOBAAL WAS NOT ALBINO OR NEANDERTHAL.
      THEY WERE TALL BLACKISH NEGROIDS. This vid is fertilizer for raceism.
      The MIS’COMPLEXIONISM in this video is pathetic, so ii just listened to the audio.

  • @MyName-pl7zn
    @MyName-pl7zn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    I am able to write this thanks to the Carthaginians, damn Romans

    • @marcelasantander7457
      @marcelasantander7457 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes !! And the pesky gossipers greeks too!

    • @Alejojojo6
      @Alejojojo6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The Latin Alphabet is still roman, it comes from the Greeks and greek comes from pheonician... if you write in pheonician you arent able to read much. What is taken from the phoenicians is mostly the idea that sounds can be turned into letters.

    • @MyName-pl7zn
      @MyName-pl7zn ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Alejojojo6 is that the first alphabet then?

    • @starcapture3040
      @starcapture3040 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Alejojojo6 Nope you are writing with phoenician Greek alphabets do not exist

    • @johndorilag4129
      @johndorilag4129 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Punic alphabet must have come somewhere or evolved from somewhere earlier

  • @kaushikmanthan9245
    @kaushikmanthan9245 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Thanks for my ancient civilization related information. But sir!
    Does anyone know where can i find this book in pdf? What's name of the book (Carthage : Traders and Writers)?

  • @user-hi4kb1ci5x
    @user-hi4kb1ci5x ปีที่แล้ว +3

    تأثير بلاد الشام على العالم لا مثيل له
    أكبر ثلاث اديان مصدرها الشام ☦️☪️✡️
    أكبر ثلاث ابجديات مصدرها الشام الاتينية السيريليه العربيه

    • @matiusbond6052
      @matiusbond6052 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Levant HAD no influence on Carthage,THERE WAS NEVER ANY LEBANESE LANGUAGE OR CULTURE IN AFRICA. ALL ANCIENT AFRICANS WERE BLACK AND BROWN PEOPLE OF THEIR NATIVE LANDS. Ancient Lebanese were Egyptians

  • @ramthianthomson601
    @ramthianthomson601 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    ขอบคุณค่ะ

  • @elcarthagenois8760
    @elcarthagenois8760 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The sacrificial theory has been disproved...

  • @maud3444
    @maud3444 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I thought the narrator said a homo called them Phoenicians at 1:43 ... took me a second to register it was Homerus. The subtitles thought it was homo too.
    Edit: absolutely love this channel! I'm watching an entire history episode every day before bed. THANK YOU Get.factual

  • @Cynewise_
    @Cynewise_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Can’t take my eyes off this steely eyed historian dude. Prof. Richard Miles , University of Sydney. If he has students, I bet they’re never late for his class.

    • @stelladonaconfredobutler9459
      @stelladonaconfredobutler9459 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      he was quite a character

    • @wasneeplus
      @wasneeplus ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Quite enjoyed his book on Carthage too.

    • @bertplank8011
      @bertplank8011 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nonsense....Miles is a politically correct ideologue who couchs history in terms of modern history/attitudes....a fatal error....since efforts are made to change history to conform.....this reeks of Marxism....
      A capable modern leader would have Miles strapped to a rack just to be on the safe side......

  • @thing8629
    @thing8629 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    the acting, the costumes... Rome HBO level: bravo!

  • @mangophoenix-tj8tf
    @mangophoenix-tj8tf ปีที่แล้ว +2

    7:26 Phoenicians and Carthaginians described as "relatives"

    • @elcarthagenois8760
      @elcarthagenois8760 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      We did not find any genes for them in Carthage 🤔

  • @josephkania642
    @josephkania642 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I wonder if any of the Carthaginian settlements in West Africa survived. And maybe Carthaginian influence was partially responsible for the Bantu expansion?

    • @e-curb
      @e-curb ปีที่แล้ว

      I doubt there were any settlements. They likely only traded.

  • @e-curb
    @e-curb ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Fun fact: the modern English word puny is a derogatory word that originates from Roman times applied to the Carthaginians.

  • @uglyfrog7263
    @uglyfrog7263 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Prof Richard Miles is great!

    • @jmwilliamsart
      @jmwilliamsart ปีที่แล้ว

      I totally agree, he’s one of my favorite historians on the subject of Carthage, Rome, and other Mediterranean civilizations.

  • @bethbartlett5692
    @bethbartlett5692 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    *Phonecians absolutely did sail to Ireland, England, and the now USA, with "artifacts and Phonecian writings", etched in stone in several locations.* (Tin) + other resources.
    Excellent "Authentic Academic" Documentary, rather than "Mainstream Academic".
    Appreciate this so.
    PS: I like Escargot.

    • @Iceican
      @Iceican ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Ireland and England maybe but the americas certainly not there is no evidence of that even remotely.

    • @com-ev5wq
      @com-ev5wq ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Iceican they for sure reached England and Ireland.

    • @trx2000ad
      @trx2000ad 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Also Sarina QLD

    • @carvingtheway
      @carvingtheway 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      🙏🏻🎯🥂🇱🇧

    • @isawwhatthedoghasdone2549
      @isawwhatthedoghasdone2549 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      no you're not them buddy​@@carvingtheway

  • @i.santos46
    @i.santos46 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    33:02 Does anyone know where can I find this book in pdf? What´s the name of the book?

  • @Bibliotecanatalie
    @Bibliotecanatalie ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Lebanon 🇱🇧

  • @annamosier1950
    @annamosier1950 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    wow

  • @DeanMurray08
    @DeanMurray08 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    ‘And Rome is a shitty little town nobody cares about’ 🤣🤣 wasn’t expecting that hahaha

  • @hakimwwe.noochergragens381
    @hakimwwe.noochergragens381 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    It's so mysterious, all those events and glories appeared to happen in the lands of the Berbers , yet there has been no mention of any sort for their contribution or any roles they may have played.if it was not of the Numidians, the history would have taken another trajectory and shape.
    The Noble Nation AMAZIGHS.
    Miraculously, it happens to be again, the Barbarie in the same land will be the masters and Lords of the Mediterranean sea once more for two centuries from 1596 to 1830 .

    • @hakimwwe.noochergragens381
      @hakimwwe.noochergragens381 ปีที่แล้ว

      @CARTHAGE TUNISIA HANNIBAL who were the Berbers in you opinion then?
      The carthagenien were originally of canaanites descents who came from the East cost of the Mediterranean, they might be in couple or fewer thousands.
      Certainly they wouldn't be able to occupy whole of north Africa and all the Med islands sicily, sardegna and bellaric islands and cost of Spain ..etc .

  • @hogwashmcturnip8930
    @hogwashmcturnip8930 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    No mention of Cartagena? Odd

  • @DS-hw8id
    @DS-hw8id 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Wow, apparently both Egyptians and Phoenicians spoke Arabic.

    • @matiusbond6052
      @matiusbond6052 ปีที่แล้ว

      egyptians and carthagenians/phoenicians were native Africans,ITS 2023

  • @fordprefect80
    @fordprefect80 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Baal and Astarte have a Warhammer 40K connection.

  • @DirtCobaine
    @DirtCobaine ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Does anyone know what he means at 26:15 when he says that ships were seen as living creatures? He doesn’t mean people actually thought ships were actually alive and therefore animals right? That would honestly surprise me

    • @fakshen1973
      @fakshen1973 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Philosophically. The same kind of care and consideration you would give a working animal, you might give a ship. They are brand new in the world, they may need maintenance, they age and become less capable, and finally there comes a time when they must return to the earth. If your civilization depends on ocean going vessels, then you'll have a high regard for them to the point of even divine influence.

    • @DirtCobaine
      @DirtCobaine ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@fakshen1973 I see thank you!

  • @fredericwild734
    @fredericwild734 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Who's the queen spilling tea on the Phoenicians?

  • @catnotpat3693
    @catnotpat3693 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Prefabricated, coded, put together modules…. So, the first IKEA?

  • @Malkibaal
    @Malkibaal ปีที่แล้ว +3

    @4:03 This is not Phoenician this is Modern Standard Arabic. I speak Modern Standard Arabic and Lebanese Arabic and also studied Biblical Hebrew and Phoenician (including the Punic dialect, which includes Carthage). Phoenician is not an Arabic language but a Canaanite language, although Arabic and Phoenician belong to the Semitic branch.
    for example he says for "500"
    مئتان وخمسون
    miʾatayn waḫamsūna
    =250
    Wrong translation and in the Byblian dialect of Phoenician from that era it would be actually
    𐤌‏𐤀‏𐤕‏𐤌‏ 𐤅‏𐤇‏𐤌‏𐤔‏𐤌‏
    miʾtêma waḥamšūma
    =250
    -
    @6:00 the Egyptians speak in Modern Standard Arabic, this is not Egyptian not accurate. Egyptian is not an Arabic language but belongs to the separate branch "Egyptian" of Afro-Asiatic, while Arabic belongs to the Afro-Asiatic branch Semitic.

    • @hosnimtir7469
      @hosnimtir7469 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Go check out the DNA studies and tests before embarrassing yourself

    • @Malkibaal
      @Malkibaal 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@hosnimtir7469
      Your comment is unrelated to my comment.
      What's your point?
      Languages do not equal ancestry or replacement of ancient previous cultures, ethnicities. This does not make Egyptians nor Lebanese "Arabs" in the true ethnic sense (defining Arabs as people who not just speak Arabic but also have a true Arab culture and are also connected by ancestry to an ancient Arab culture).
      -
      I am not an Arabist by the way and as a Lebanese I identify myself as a human and then Lebanese descending from Phoenician-Canaanites but also being Arabized linguistically because Phoenician is no longer spoken and Lebanese Arabic is not Phoenician and does not descend from it. But I do not identify myself as an Arab. The modern Arab identity is purely based on linguistics and not on cultural elements and emerged in the 20th century CE (It is defined like this: Everyone who speaks natively Arabic is an Arab). However speaking Arabic is not enough to claim to belong to a fully and true, actual Arab culture in the historical sense when the definition of "Arab" had a different meanng and was broader and included culture, ancestry, a certain area and other elements.
      --
      But yes I am aware of the DNA studies.
      Modern Arabic speaking populations of the Canaan area are mostly Arabized and still descend from the local ancient populations in case of Lebanon it is the Phoenician-Canaanites. The modern populations of the Levant do not descend mostly from the Arabian peninsula nor from Arabs nor do the ancient populations of Canaan descend from the Arabian peninsula or from Arabs. The following are DNA studies of ancient and modern populations which back up what I said:
      The genomic history of the Middle East
      By Mohamed A. Almarri et al., 2021
      www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(21)00839-4
      Continuity and Admixture in the Last Five Millennia of Levantine History from Ancient Canaanite and Present-Day Lebanese Genome Sequences
      Marc Haber et al., 2017
      www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5544389/
      Ancient DNA sheds light on the genetic origins of early Iron Age Philistines
      By Michal Feldman et al., 2019
      www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aax0061
      "On the other hand, Levant Arabs are distant from Saudis, Kuwaitis, and Yeminis, an indication that the contribution of the Arabian Peninsula populations to Levantine gene pool is low, probably due to the absence of the demographic aspect of 7th century invasion."
      "The strong relatedness between Levant Arab populations is explained by their common ancestry, the ancient Canaanites, who came either from Africa or Arabian Peninsula via Egypt in 3300 BC [97], and settled in Levant lowlands after collapse of Ghassulian civilization in 3800-3350 BC [98]"
      Quotes from:
      The genetic heterogeneity of Arab populations as inferred from HLA genes
      By Abdelhafidh Hajjej et al., 2018
      journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0192269
      -
      But my point in my previous comment still stands:
      Lebanese Arabic for example belongs to the Levantine Arabic branch of the Arabic languages and not to Phoenician. The same counts for the languages of modern Egyptians they are Egyptian Arabic languages. Only the liturgical language of the Copts called Coptic is a descendant of the ancient Egyptian language. All modern spoken Arabic language did not evolve directly from Classical Arabic nor from Quran Arabic and did not evolve in a linear way but they are linguistically Arabic.
      The Semitic Languages: An International Handbook
      By Stefan Weninger, 2011
      Page 853 and page 920-935 (Levantine Arabic)
      The Subgrouping of the Semitic Languages
      By Na'ama Pat-El, 2018 (language tree and linguistic classification of the Semitic languages, Arabic and Phoenician are here separate)
      www.academia.edu/37145037/The_Subgrouping_of_the_Semitic_Languages
      The Semitic Languages - 2nd Edition
      By John Huehnergard, Na'ama Pat-El, 2019
      Page 403-432 (Levantine Arabic)
      The Cambridge Handbook of African Linguistics
      By H. Ekkehard Wolff, 2019
      Page 262 (language tree and linguistic classification of the Semitic languages, Arabic and Phoenician are here also separate)
      Versteegh about Proto-Neo-Arabic:
      "The heterogeneous nature of the transmission process, the involvement of different chronological layers, and the persisting contacts with the Peninsula in some areas all conspire to shake the foundations of any reconstruction of Proto-New-Arabic."
      -Kees Versteegh, page 244
      From:
      A linguistic history of Arabic (review)
      By Kees Versteegh, 2010
      www.researchgate.net/publication/261904421_A_linguistic_history_of_Arabic_by_Jonathan_Owens
      Why "Levantine" is Arabic, not Aramaic:
      By Lamee Souag (a linguist)
      lughat.blogspot.com/2014/09/why-levantine-is-arabic-not-aramaic.html
      lughat.blogspot.nl/2014/09/why-levantine-is-arabic-not-aramaic_8.html
      lughat.blogspot.nl/2014/09/why-levantine-is-arabic-not-aramaic_11.html
      lughat.blogspot.nl/2014/09/on-finding-sources-of-shared-items-or.html
      lughat.blogspot.com/2018/01/taleb-unintentionally-proves-lebanese.html

  • @saifabuzeid999
    @saifabuzeid999 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Did the Carthaginian talk Arabic or just voice translation

    • @matiusbond6052
      @matiusbond6052 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      rabs arabs didn't invade north Africa until 7th century AD CARTHAGENIANS WERE NATIVE AFRICANS

  • @bethbartlett5692
    @bethbartlett5692 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    *"DNA Clarifies so much, I so appreciate this, I so appreciate Facts."*
    *The Phonecians, "the World's Seafarers".*
    Basque, Phonecian/Sardinian, Anatolian = my Irish DNA.

    • @isawwhatthedoghasdone2549
      @isawwhatthedoghasdone2549 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Carthaginian genes = Berber Genes + Anatolian genes = Contemporary Tunisian

  • @shutupavi
    @shutupavi 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    2:27 they called their land Knun. Read up

  • @houssem.khaled
    @houssem.khaled ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great documentary except for the dialogues being in modern Arabic... Carthage (modern day Tunisia) was arabized in the 7th century AD which makes it impossible for Carthaginians to be speaking Arabic at the time of Hanno, Hannibal, etc.

    • @matiusbond6052
      @matiusbond6052 ปีที่แล้ว

      E NATIVE AFRICANSIN AGAIN CARTHAGENIANS WHO

  • @harryvouloukos2057
    @harryvouloukos2057 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    correct me if I am wrong! but logically speaking the first to build a boats must be the ones who lived on an island first yes!? maybe ... Crete... minoan empire but then again who am I ...you seem to know the facts...

  • @khubza8999
    @khubza8999 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Phoenicians are speaking ARABIC @4:17 Original IKEA shipbuilders!

  • @joanhuffman2166
    @joanhuffman2166 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Regarding child sacrifice, the Jews, the Greeks and the Romans who lived at the same time said they sacrificed their children. Dr Moncef Ben Moussa of the modern world, couldn't be. 🙄

    • @e-curb
      @e-curb ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Just because they all said that, doesn't make it true.

  • @freepagan
    @freepagan 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    They're not speaking Phoenician, they're speaking ARABIC lol

  • @denisestetler3887
    @denisestetler3887 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Really dislike the close captions. I barly see them let alone read them.

    • @e-curb
      @e-curb ปีที่แล้ว +1

      turn them off.

  • @crackin2000
    @crackin2000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The purple dye was minoan first.

    • @bethbartlett5692
      @bethbartlett5692 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Check, the DNA reflects Phonecian, I believe.

    • @crackin2000
      @crackin2000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@bethbartlett5692 the purple came from shell fish not the actual people. Minoans discovered how to make it . Pheonetians inherited and spread the knowledge and it was no longer unique.

    • @bethbartlett5692
      @bethbartlett5692 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@crackin2000
      I understand, my point is both knew the process of extracting the purple dye.
      A shared knowledge, because the are the same Peoples. The Phonecians are also known as the Carthagenans, the Punics, and some believe the Minonians were either Phonecians too or influenced by them.
      Confusion comes with the varied references to them, via Greeks, Romans, etc.
      DNA Mapping of migrations has helped this get clarity.

  • @lidiabano4698
    @lidiabano4698 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    That's not 'phoenician' it is the VInca symbols found in eastern europe

  • @abeddani992
    @abeddani992 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I dont think phoenicians neither Egyptians at that time spoke arabic😢

  • @footfoot07011988
    @footfoot07011988 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Whaht about berbers ? they were inexistant at that time ???

    • @rififienforce
      @rififienforce ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Because their contribution is always ignored and négliged and disguised by the 'punic' word.

  • @debhurd8898
    @debhurd8898 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The language was Punic, wasn't it? Why is it called Phoenician here?

    • @sun_land
      @sun_land ปีที่แล้ว +1

      3 names for the same people. They are called differently by who is calling them, their language and culture.

  • @dogslivesmatterdanielstanc214
    @dogslivesmatterdanielstanc214 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It doesn't make sense for the story of the pupp picking up the snail and his mouth turned purple because of every thing else that has to be added to it? the

  • @rommeljasonlimos432
    @rommeljasonlimos432 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Near East?? What Near East? You called out Homer for using 'Phoenicians' and then get someone to call the Carthaginians from the "Near East' as 'imperialist'...hah

  • @samiatash2160
    @samiatash2160 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What language did they speak?

  • @EdenHazard-ni1cq
    @EdenHazard-ni1cq ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why did the assyrians speak arabic at the beginning?

  • @cariri12
    @cariri12 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    He's so sassy, isn't he

  • @williamwilson2270
    @williamwilson2270 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Assyrians sound more like the English, the Romans.

  • @martinavalente6814
    @martinavalente6814 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I guess I'll have to add ships to the list of things Greeks took from other cultures but is never credited

  • @desdicadoric
    @desdicadoric 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Bhaal worship ? Still happens

  • @marshalllee7720
    @marshalllee7720 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    the history channel form of presentation must die. Your intentions in this nice little film may be well, but many see the reenactment style as an insult to intelligence and time wasted. Example, you already talked about the ship production. Why was their a need to waste time and money on a rehash reenactment, when you could have elaborated on something else. More could be covered with simple discussion and presentation with or without visual aids, and still come out better than the speculative and more often than not, inaccurate reenactment.

  • @Philip-gn8wx
    @Philip-gn8wx 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Which was the worst? The Carthaginians? Or, the Romans? 💀

  • @drdavidtee
    @drdavidtee ปีที่แล้ว +4

    unfortunately, all information about Carthage, etc., comes from their enemies. Sorry, much of this, including the gods and child sacrifice, is not verified

  • @negrodelfin
    @negrodelfin 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Purple

  • @peterdeafy187
    @peterdeafy187 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Rome was militaristic dats y dey won buttom line they were not a better race

  • @ceehle27
    @ceehle27 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The alphabet is Hebrew. To not show this origin is conspiratorial. Paleo Hebrew is the source of our writing style and the original tonal pronunciation of letters. YHWH IS BLESSED

  • @aa-zz6328
    @aa-zz6328 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The closest thing they got to ancient Phoenician was Modern Standard Arabic!

    • @matiusbond6052
      @matiusbond6052 ปีที่แล้ว

      Original Phoenicians were Egyptians.Arabs have no historical development in Africa.

    • @aa-zz6328
      @aa-zz6328 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@matiusbond6052 No! They were Canaanite!

  • @lowellwagner7991
    @lowellwagner7991 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Please, please, please - where is a history video that does not have a budget for awful stock soundtracks? 😢

  • @bothewolf3466
    @bothewolf3466 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nice, one criticism. I didn't know who some of the speakers were until like 1/2 way through they get an identification on screen (like the Sydney professor for example). Let me know who is speaking when they appear on screen. The reason being sometimes someone says something nutty and you want to look it up and find out references on the speaker. Otherwise, well put together docco.

    • @CFinch360
      @CFinch360 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      You must have missed the first introduction of Prof. Miles starting at 2:34 because they introduce him within 5 seconds of when he starts talking at 2:31. Maybe check the facts before you criticize?

    • @e-curb
      @e-curb ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CFinch360 Bo is suggesting to put the names up every time they switch to the various profs.

  • @michaelcardamone1209
    @michaelcardamone1209 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Carthago delenda est

  • @WandaDeeBackroads
    @WandaDeeBackroads 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    20:35 - No Hebrew human sacrifice? Read Judges 11:30-39. That's one they didn't cover in Sunday school.

  • @karenalletson9767
    @karenalletson9767 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Absolute nonsense. They were not the first to build ocean going vessels. Thousands of years before them, reed ships were sailing the Oceans and trading internationally. Plank ships were copies of these reed ships.

  • @sadpanda3431
    @sadpanda3431 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    phonecian alphabet is the origin of all western alphabets? so the romans had no alphabet before their contact with carthage?

    • @sun_land
      @sun_land ปีที่แล้ว +1

      you got it wrong mate. In fact phoenician alphabet is the origin, right. But you are jumping from one era to another. Even if the Carthaginian are originated from Tyre, populated by the phoenician...there is a large gap of time between these two periods.
      So to answer your second question, the romans had an alphabet...to make it simple, and also the etruscan, which were on the paeninsula italica.

    • @sadpanda3431
      @sadpanda3431 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sun_land i know, this is why i ask, in the doc the guy said the ph alphabet is the origin of all western a. He did not say nothing from this time period to this time period

    • @carminecampfiresong
      @carminecampfiresong ปีที่แล้ว

      Just specifically the one we use now maybe

    • @yoroshikuonegaishimasu8649
      @yoroshikuonegaishimasu8649 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@sadpanda3431 phoenicians are older than rome, and carthage was founded a bit sooner than rome too

  • @eppurse
    @eppurse ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bizarre lecturers-Miles, stand up straight-your delivery is swishy and distracting- what are you selling?

  • @arronwatson6204
    @arronwatson6204 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wrong civilization bro.

  • @carvingtheway
    @carvingtheway 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Phoenicians truly R d missing link of human history... In relevance with not only trade but also, modern global languages,art, architecture,war tactics, technology as well as d sense of adventure and patriotism.....and all of that in a friendly business manner unless in d position of self defense..... check out Baalbek and d port cities in Lebanon,,Byblos tyre...some impossible stone work yet existing in plain sight...

  • @humboldthammer
    @humboldthammer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Up until yesterday, I thought the Phoenicians were named after the Phoenix.
    Homer set me straight. It's because Phoenicians were purple . . . with one eye, one horn and . . . I mean, they WORE purple. My baaa'd. Never before have so many educated people lived so freely, so abundantly, and so Connected to a shared, worldwide experience . . .
    it's GUARANTEED to Wake THIS Generation Up!

  • @tylerhay6560
    @tylerhay6560 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I think Richard Miles looks drunk and especially after he describes early Rome as a “shitty little town.”

    • @johnnywindsor183
      @johnnywindsor183 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He is a strange one him like 🥺

    • @jmwilliamsart
      @jmwilliamsart ปีที่แล้ว +4

      He said that Rome was “Hicksville on the river Tiber”, which it was at the time. Rome was a more modest city compared to Carthage at that time.

    • @jacobcholkur7773
      @jacobcholkur7773 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Rome is a shitty City.

  • @aphunt12
    @aphunt12 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Since when is a 50 minutes ad ok?

    • @lernmor2137
      @lernmor2137 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      For building a time machine???

  • @FranticMissyOfficial
    @FranticMissyOfficial 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Abortion is modern day sacrifice. I’m not saying this as a prolife comment. I’m saying it because it’s TRUTH.

    • @ahmedelakrab
      @ahmedelakrab 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      If you want to redefine sacrifice and modern, then yes!

    • @FranticMissyOfficial
      @FranticMissyOfficial 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ahmedelakrab I don’t think we need to redefine anything as this is a very very old concept that goes back to the beginning of time. Being pedantic won’t change history. Are you aware of what the “valley of the shadow of death” meant when referenced in Psalm 23? I’m not a Bible beater… but when you notice patterns of behavior in history it starts to all make sense.

    • @jimr9499
      @jimr9499 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      "I'm not a Bible beater" proceeds to beat the bible....

    • @tymanung6382
      @tymanung6382 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wars of aggression sacrifice the most
      number of people.

  • @saifabuzeid999
    @saifabuzeid999 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I thought maybe they talk a little Arabic because there is Arabs at Levantine

    • @Alejojojo6
      @Alejojojo6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Arab is from the Arabic penninsula. Both from the semitic family but unable to understand each other. Arabs in the Levant came thousands of years later.

    • @saifabuzeid999
      @saifabuzeid999 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ya like the ghasanids and the nabetians Arab they where latent Arabs

  • @Christoforos1948
    @Christoforos1948 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yeah the Greeks controlled the stories HA HA HA

  • @redbirdsaraceno
    @redbirdsaraceno ปีที่แล้ว

    that professor from Sydney seems either drunk or stoned a bit .

  • @spiritualhumanist
    @spiritualhumanist ปีที่แล้ว +2

    When drunk English football hooligan is teaching you a history.