Though I don't have the game I still like watching SC2 pro playing against each other. But seeing this, isn't protoss carrier and mothership kind of weak? I feel like the carrier should at least be able to send the interceptors much farther.
In reality battlecruiser would win against all units in game, exept maybe mothership but i think mothership in reality would be defenceless like in Homeworld 2
@@sajukkhar2 are you talking about lore? In lore a BC would lose a 1v1 against every single Protoss ship lol. Void Rays tear through them. Carriers are stronger and have arbiters, scout and phoenixes to help them out. Motherships can destroy entire Terran fleets on their own. A Tempest would obliterate a BC before it could come in range. Why do you think the Protoss are a way more advanced race buddy?
A BC (defg) beat a mothership one on one. And a carrier. To be fair, maybe the carrier would have beaten it if the BC didn't yamato and just target fired it, but even so, thats really powerful. And the tempest almost won as well. Only a tempest shot in it.
@@sCr33nSh0o71 i don't find the "more technologically advanced" myself, but they are surprisingly weak considering they are meant to be super strong lore wise. Hell, a group of marines obliterates a carrier. And protos has the scout. Even wraiths are better than scouts.
The Carrier still loses actually, but mass Carrier can beat mass BC if the BC micro sucks. In skilled hands they have no chance. In a 1v1, the only Toss unit that has any chance to defeat a BC is the Tempest, and you still have to micro like crazy. Overall though, Skytoss is still very good vs BC's. Tempest + Mothership is a nightmare.
@@ZC.Andrew I have never seen mass carriers beat mass BCs in both BW and Sc2. Yamato, and half the carriers are gone. Then you just cruise your fleet around until the interceptors are all dead. Also, Supernova (former pro player) has shown that nothing counters 200 supply 3-3 BCs even at the high Masters/GM level. He has beaten mass Tempest, mass Thor, mass Corruptor Viper and etc with mass BC. You can check out his TH-cam. He has plenty of videos. The reason you don't see mass BC in pro games much is because you can't realistically get there xD
@@sCr33nSh0o71 They had to balance the game play. Lore accurate Protoss fleets would vaporize Terran fleets of similar size in seconds. Like....in the lore, a single Carrier wiped out the BC fleet defending Mar Sara iirc. A Mothership can melt through planets. We can't have that in game xD
This is a bit biased. BC would win against carrier in small numbers, but in real game if battle of fleets is happening then numbers of units on both sides is much bigger. You will have atleast 11 carriers and your opponent will have 11 BC. When we talk about greater numbers carier takes it. You cant do yamato on every carrier because human fingers are too slow and some of BC will be alr destroyed.
i think ur the biased one. Did u not see the first fight where the cruiser didnt even yamato? Also there are videos of BC vs carriers in mass. The BC still win.
Excuse me, why do you micro some units while not microing others? Cyclone gets microed and wins for instance, but not the Tempest. Worthless comparison.
![ULTRALISK vs THOR vs IMMORTAL! [STARCRAFT 2]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/OtHVWnGxR_o/mqdefault.jpg)
![ULTRALISK vs THOR vs IMMORTAL! [STARCRAFT 2]](/img/tr.png)
![THOR vs ALL UNITS [STARCRAFT 2]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Wxs3ZIrSGTY/mqdefault.jpg)
![ARCHON vs ALL UNITS [STARCRAFT 2]](/img/n.gif)
Killing the interceptors first before moving on to the defenseless Carrier is such a chad move.
the battlecruiser is kinda operational
This is my favorite Terran Unit.
And I'm so hapy to see him win almost every fight.
Al least here.
Battlecruiser Operational
Though I don't have the game I still like watching SC2 pro playing against each other. But seeing this, isn't protoss carrier and mothership kind of weak? I feel like the carrier should at least be able to send the interceptors much farther.
Bc wins vs carrier in small numbers easily (4v4, 6v6) but typically protoss has more carriers and kites bcs so its kinda balanced.
In reality battlecruiser would win against all units in game, exept maybe mothership but i think mothership in reality would be defenceless like in Homeworld 2
@@sajukkhar2 are you talking about lore? In lore a BC would lose a 1v1 against every single Protoss ship lol. Void Rays tear through them. Carriers are stronger and have arbiters, scout and phoenixes to help them out. Motherships can destroy entire Terran fleets on their own. A Tempest would obliterate a BC before it could come in range. Why do you think the Protoss are a way more advanced race buddy?
"In reality". Do you even realize how stupid that sentence is?
Just combine Carrier with Void ray and BC is dead. Or Carrier with Stalkers
We can concluded that BC win againts everything on solo. If he use yamato first
If no micro, the BC beats every unit in the game without Yamato in a 1v1 except a Raven :P
@@jimmyha1898 you should not micro the raven, too. only f2 and auto attack
if solo without detector, the BC will lose to wraith and ghost haha
@@jimmyha1898 if no micro
woah, it's almost like it was designed to be the strongest unit in the game with a ridiculously high cost...
2bad infestors make it fucking obsolete
550 HP and Armor Upgrades plus Yamato Cannon and standard laser batteries.... yup
A BC (defg) beat a mothership one on one. And a carrier. To be fair, maybe the carrier would have beaten it if the BC didn't yamato and just target fired it, but even so, thats really powerful. And the tempest almost won as well. Only a tempest shot in it.
my main problem with sc is that terran and zerg always feel more technologicaly advanced and more powerfull than protoss
@@sCr33nSh0o71 i don't find the "more technologically advanced" myself, but they are surprisingly weak considering they are meant to be super strong lore wise. Hell, a group of marines obliterates a carrier. And protos has the scout. Even wraiths are better than scouts.
The Carrier still loses actually, but mass Carrier can beat mass BC if the BC micro sucks. In skilled hands they have no chance. In a 1v1, the only Toss unit that has any chance to defeat a BC is the Tempest, and you still have to micro like crazy. Overall though, Skytoss is still very good vs BC's. Tempest + Mothership is a nightmare.
@@ZC.Andrew I have never seen mass carriers beat mass BCs in both BW and Sc2. Yamato, and half the carriers are gone. Then you just cruise your fleet around until the interceptors are all dead. Also, Supernova (former pro player) has shown that nothing counters 200 supply 3-3 BCs even at the high Masters/GM level. He has beaten mass Tempest, mass Thor, mass Corruptor Viper and etc with mass BC. You can check out his TH-cam. He has plenty of videos. The reason you don't see mass BC in pro games much is because you can't realistically get there xD
@@sCr33nSh0o71 They had to balance the game play. Lore accurate Protoss fleets would vaporize Terran fleets of similar size in seconds. Like....in the lore, a single Carrier wiped out the BC fleet defending Mar Sara iirc. A Mothership can melt through planets. We can't have that in game xD
What is the mod called?
How can we do that on thee game ?
what is the name of this card?
what is the name of this map?
Hi you gonna play tabs its another battle simulator
Hi
poor stalker
This is totally different in nexus wars.
This is a bit biased. BC would win against carrier in small numbers, but in real game if battle of fleets is happening then numbers of units on both sides is much bigger. You will have atleast 11 carriers and your opponent will have 11 BC. When we talk about greater numbers carier takes it. You cant do yamato on every carrier because human fingers are too slow and some of BC will be alr destroyed.
i think ur the biased one. Did u not see the first fight where the cruiser didnt even yamato? Also there are videos of BC vs carriers in mass. The BC still win.
BC Still win in a pure fight.
BC wins, Carrier is viabile because of the support they get from protoss. Suport terran lacks , at least against zerg ...
Excuse me, why do you micro some units while not microing others? Cyclone gets microed and wins for instance, but not the Tempest. Worthless comparison.
He shows what happens when a lock on unit like cyclone is microed, tempest can’t shoot while moving so it was specifically shown for cyclone
He didn't use the Viper parasite bomb too :,)
@@Democracyofficer22 the tempest is a fantastic kiting unit. If you a-move it you deserve to lose
@@samuelhakansson6680how is the tempest supposed to kite a battlecruiser that attacks while moving???
BATTLECRUISER really become a ship he should be
not like SC1's ship,{byu!} {byu!}.......
They did career fucking weak!
BATTLECRUISER VS ALL UNITS ✖
BATTLECRUISER DESTROYS ALL UNITS ✔