@@Andrew79334 I can tell you are from a weak country. All of you whine like a hurt little girl. Pointing fingers at everyone except your own corrupt state. Pathetic really and the reason your country is what it is.
India special forces defeated special forces of all the other countries in a competition in Africa, now ofc anyone can argue no one will show their full capabilities and so on. But still... Doubting our men isn't a good way to go, we have a lot of experience with wars, and peacekeeping as well. Edit: Also, war between UK and India is highly unlikely. Extremely Highly unlikely. And some of these numbers are wrong.
Sorry bro i dont think UK would help INDIA in any form just by looking at the track record, infact uk sided with Pakistan in 1971 war against INDIA (which INDIA won btw)
@@SuyashBajpai-k6z India fought a lot of wars in the 20th century but none in the last 25 years which matters for its current military age population. The insurgents facing Indian troops are no more threatening than street gangs. India never had to take entire regions lead alone cities that were occupied by insurgents. India has a long way to go and that's not just me saying that, top Indian officials in the Indian military agree.
coincidentally, today PM modi is inducting 3 new naval assests of a destroyer,frigate and a diesel electric submarine today. so you can make it to 296 ships
Idk where he's getting the 900,000 reserve personnel from???. As of January 2025, the UK Armed Forces have approximately 183,230 personnel, including both regular and reserve forces. This includes: 138,120 Regular Forces (across the Army, Navy, and RAF) 432,420 Volunteer Reserves 48,380 other personnel, including Gurkhas and Sponsored Reserves 4Specifically for the British Army: Regular Army: 74,296 personnel (including 4,244 Gurkhas) Army Reserve: 25,934 personnel
@ It's an unfortunate truth. I don't know how their export rules work as far as rules for supply they must have on hand, but I imagine their stockpiles are running mighty low because of all that's been sent to Ukraine. Might be a goof time to invest in European and American munitions manufacturing, as I'm sure they're gonna be putting in large domestic orders (if they haven't already.)
We know the British army is one of the best trained army in the world but dont forget India bases there army on the British model any way and in some ways harder plus because they have such a big population they can be picky on who they chose to join so the quality is gona be good right from the start ,were as England are struggling to re recruit
Do you think Indian weapons are inferior then you better think twice. If you think British solders are superior then Indian then you better think twice as well. Without Nato , Britain is nowhere near to India. But both of India and Britain will never going to war. Indian weapons are of same or better quality then British. So search before commenting. I know in some domains we are behind but I hope in next ten years we will also cover that as well. India enemies are China, Pakistan and may be in future some other as well.
If it's is on Quality Than India already improved this at 2018 they already replaced all old weapons otherwise the number you seeing would had been more And The Military rank are also done by Quality also not just Quantity If it was in Quantity then Pakistan would had more upper rank because their military size is bigger than UK in mostly everthing But this year in 2025 Pakistan miltary rank declined from 9th to 12th because of the quality and the operation they did And India is at 4th is not just Quantity but also Quality and I say more advance and more well trained soliders and it's better And I also wish both our nation keep good relation with each other
India's weapons and aircraft are purchased from France , america , israel and Russia so they are more advanced in technology whereas uk technology is not very good . Also troops or sliders of india are well trained and also give training to other Nations military so this is way better than uk in general ❤😂
India doesn't need anybody's help against China. We are self sufficient. They cannot fight for long in the mountains in which Indian Soldiers are outstanding.
9:27 if india china war happens , it wouldn't be india china , Pakistan will join too.... , then afganistan , Bangladesh too joins , russia will be neutral
We do know, from many wars, including ww2, that QUALITY does not matter, only NUMBERS matter, just look at the lemming trains of russian soldiers, just there to drain the ammo from the germans, lol or the weak shermans, before the got the bigger cannon from the UK.....1400 tigers 6000 panthers, vs 84 000t-34 and 50 000 sherman???? that is 134 000 tanks vs 7400 tanks......yea, numbers matter, it is the only thing that matters, just spam it out and overwhelm
I mean let's ignore the fact that the UK is part of NATO and obviously America would get involved. So it realistically would be a steamroll. One on one would be kind of interesting as the UK has decently high-tech weapons and equipment. Compared to what India has but India does have numbers so the interesting thing about it in my opinion is while they have numbers that doesn't necessarily mean that they would win numbers isn't everything
I'm an American so my view on this might be a little bit skewed but I think it would be freaking hard but not impossible for the UK to win. The quality of the equipment and the soldiers would definitely be its own advantage and I'll just be honest with you I would take a platoon of UK troops over 2 platoons of Indian soldiers.
WTF 😂😂 are you talking about I agree that India is sucks in jet engine technology and may be other weapons but Indian missile arsenal is far ahead of UK and china 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉 Obviously (1) Russia (2)usa (3)India (4)israel and china Give me single example where India lacks in missile technology - nah never
India is country with most people in the entire world, so ofc they will have a huge army, a tiny percent for them will be a huge percent for the UK if to match direct numbers
Yeah but the economies are near identical (obviously not exactly the same but close enough) so they can both field the same amount of weapons . Hypothetically the UK could buy enough weapons for everyone but for India that would only be a small percentage . So talking about numbers it would come to a point where India would just be using men with sticks if that makes sense .
It doesn't matter how many machines any country has it is about maintaining them. The more you have the more it is difficult to maintain. That is why US is retiring old planes example the A10, destroying old aircraft carriers, and even some of their f22s. Too hard to maintain and keeping up with upgrades.
You guys are not even worthy of comparison.But it's not a disrespect to your country but it's a fact. And the craziest part is No one can defeat us in our soil.
About Your point of the quality and training of troops India regularly trains with Russia, Australia, US, UK, France, Japan. Joint Military, Naval and Air force trainings are a thing, let's say technologically UK is still superior in some things, as an Indian I will admit India's system are a mix bag of really advanced systems and old reliable equipments. But isn't that to be expected with a military that big and the recovering India needs to do? I don't think that a single IN soldier is that skillless compared to a single UK soldier especially since Indian troops under the UN's peace keeping force regulations do serve alongside the western and NATO nations also, no there won't be a war between India and UK. Let's be honest here nobody wants a war with anyone especially between 2 major powers no to mention nuclear capable opponent. (India has an advantage over UK in the Nuclear Triad there's only 4 countries in the world that have a nuclear triad- US, RUSSIA, CHINA AND INDIA. Nuclear triad is that a country is capable of launching nukes from- land, water and air.) Also, no one would actually wanna go on a direct open war with the most populated country in the world or the current strongest military alliance it's just stupid.
lol calm down. India's quality of training comes from its numerous MASSIVE wars fought in the last 80 years. India has fought 8 wars and won 7 of them, some of them at heights of 18000 ft +. The world's largest bi lateral war victory since WW2 is India's (Indo-Pak War 1971). Not to mention everyday operations on the world's most dangerous border. In terms of technology , India is ahead in MOST areas. Be it superior warships, or superior air defence and artillery or superior missiles.
Why do you do this? If you have any educational video then post it . Always India vs ... another country. Because you don't have anything else to do and you don't know anything. People in India make fun of you guys after watching your videos. 😂
India has mostly Russian hardware and having masses of that hasn't done Russia any good against the kind of military tech Britain has. I can't imagine a scenerio in which India would attack Britain and that's the only scenerio in which NATO would be involved. India has one nuclear powered ballistic missile sub and it's a prototype. Britain has four Trident nuclear subs each with 16 Trident ICBMs. Each missile carries four warheads which can be independently targeted. That is Britain's sole nuclear force since the RAF no longer has any aircraft capable of carrying a nuclear bomb. India is modernizing it's military because of China, but they're beginning to realize that relying on Russian gear was a huge mistake. All those helicopters can't fly at the altitudes along the border with China and the Russian tanks also function very poorly in that area. Pakistan has an alliance with China and has allowed the Chinese to build a large port on their coast and build a modern road linking it with China. India is afraid that port will be used as a base for the Chinese Navy. That's why they're expanding their navy. I know many people in the UK still have an attachment to India, but I think India has largely forgotten that Britain exists. Time to move on.
I think you need some catching up to do when it comes to India's military. There are already two ssbns in service with the navy (fully operational) and a third one on its way. India has already developed and inducted the 'Prachand' attack helicopter with the highest service ceiling for use in the himalayas because both the Apache and the Hind in service with iaf struggle to operate in that environment. A new light tank 'Zorawar' is in the later stages of development which is to be fielded in the himalayas.
You are saying that UK 🇬🇧 has NATO . But dont forget bro INDIA 🇮🇳 has BRICS , if u r going to bring US 🇺🇸 then we can bring RUSSIA 🇷🇺 and CHINA 🇨🇳 too.
america is a neto country yet talking about army control on another nato country grrenland don't know about you but that itself gives me a clear picture about the strength & unity of nato😅😅😅
bro all of NATO is backed by USA , as if you exclude USA from NATO the numbers are still less from India , and now with donald trump he will exclude USA from NATO in near future , and dont forget if west have NATO , we have BRICS and the numbers and firepower of BRICS is unimaginable and way beyond of NATO to fight 😂😂😂
well BRICS is not a military partnership like the NATO, so even if india goes to war, brics countries are not obligated to help india. It depends on individual countries if they would help india or not. But on the other hand trump doesn't like nato so much, so if usa goes away from nato, then nato's power would go down exponentially.
I think the only problem with relying on NATO for y'all is (without the US) you're partnering with many other European powers (except for Poland) who have let their military power dwindle. Which is also why we have such a metric F ton of kit and always more in development/production here in the US. I really would love to see the British military aircraft industry come back in force. Y'all produced some beautiful birds (and the planes aren't bad either 🤪)
I was in MLRS in the US Army and we had half of what Britain has in our motor pool alone, much less all of Fort Sill, Oklahoma. We got your back mate 👍🏻🇺🇸🇬🇧
Id love to see UK and India become partners and help each other out it would be great for UK as India's growing so fast France and USA and many other countries are trying for a piece of it, and i think France is ahead of UK they are about to do another Rafal deal ,and might give over 100% full tech on there Safran jet engines ,while RR in uk have refused so far ,and also France are looking into buying Indian missiles ,Macron is always going over there
France is wayy ahead in terms of partnerships with india, they are sharing so much of military technology, doing so many deals worth billions of dollars. On the other hand I don't see UK right now doing any considerable deal with the indians. imo france is way ahead of usa and uk or any other western counterparts. France easily comes in top 3 of india's partners
@@braddbradd5671problem with uk is it's under complete influence of usa. Atleast france maintain some autonomy regarding that so it's difficult for India to buy and trust from uk.European countries put embargo on artillery shells and parts during our previous wars but france didn't that's why france is ahead of uk in relationship with India and they didn't sanction us during nuclear tests .uk and us still kept sanctions intact on our civil nuclear deal programs. While russia builts nuclear power plants in India and french also help a little bit in that field with joint miniature nuclear reactors and then comes Israel who always stood by us as well
@@nidheeshkumar6760 Yeah i totally agree and France always had an interest in India and was an ally against the British ,its good to see they still want to be friends after 300 years shame the same cant happen in UK as there are so many Indians there
Our military is no more it's gone soft and so have the people the militaries we'd face are tough people living in what we call harsh conditions, their comfortable in a harsh environment as a country forget the military. Draft would be called and even woth nato it's all so complicated and drafted citizens of our countries arnt used to real hardship like the people they'd face. I don't think we'd stand a chance Germany had quality over quantity it worked for so long then russia began mass production of an effective tank land lease also and USA joined and mass produced cheap effective equipment like firefly sherwani with the British gun. Russia and China still have this ability we no longer do we're doing it the german way while they're sticking to what's always worked in a war of attraction.
(64 TRILLION DOLLARS FROM EAST INDIA COMPANY REPORT OXFAM) INDIA NOT POOR COUNTRY PAST AED Bharat not give up world third largest economy in tha future
they recovered so quickly by using cheap gas from Russia and cheap labor from China. All BRCI countries have been helping each other out for years and years. Sorry bud India and China resolved its border dispute at the last BRICS summit.
Bro! if you ae gonna bring NATO again n again then why even watch this comparision in the first place? India also has defence pact with Russia so we can also add Russia defence equipments too u know, what a time waste
Indian army has way more experience in war thn UK and that's excluding peacekeeping mission and Indian defense forces are one of the most renowned in the world thats why even YOU have a gorkha regiment. so yes you are being baised my dear friend.
Bro you gotta think. Depending on other people tp fight your fight is a bitch move. Let’s pretend the US finally gets tired of the monetary cost of d3fending other countries who spend elsewhere. For example most European countries have free healthcare at the cost of their defense🤷♂️ just saying . Also US gives monetary aid to a large amount of countries. I would think the savings of we quit defending other countries and givin* them aid could help the US pay of its debt pretty quickly. Just saying is a country really great if they depend on other countries for defense and monetary aid 🤷♂️. And at what point should the US stop or reduce its support
UK's time is long gone my friend. This is gonna hurt a lot, USA is pretty much looking after you guys. The age of UK is long gone. You don't know the Indian soldiers my friend. It's not wise to compare the two with knowledge of one. I understand it hurts but you guys can't even go beyond the planet earth. A nation who has reached mars and moon, I don't think quality of machinery can be doubt. Going to space is tough.
Most driven assets are becoming more and more useless with the revolution of many kinds of drones used these days in war... so.. I dont even know how much useful many of these mobile assets will be even more when talking about land based assets.. Even aircraft carriers could become overwhelmed by a naval attack combined with water and air drones...
Just Today INDIA 🇮🇳 commissioned 2 new warships and 1 submarine.
Yaa....
1. INS Surat
2. INS Nilgiri
3. INS Vaghsheer
Jan 17 3more ship
@@GHOST_1410-z2w As a indian when india develop 3 rd aircraft carriers
NATO is a defensive agreement. If the UK was the aggressor towards a non-member, the other members have no obligation to join in the fight.
who says.
did you forget about Iraq, Syria and Libya? not so defensive it seems, always the aggressors.
@@Andrew79334 NATO participated in the the Balkans in the 90's and Afghanistan in peacekeeping and deterrence capacities.
@@timmooney7528 lol no, you mean they illegally bombed Serbia and illegally invaded Afghanistan
@@Andrew79334 I can tell you are from a weak country. All of you whine like a hurt little girl. Pointing fingers at everyone except your own corrupt state. Pathetic really and the reason your country is what it is.
India special forces defeated special forces of all the other countries in a competition in Africa, now ofc anyone can argue no one will show their full capabilities and so on. But still... Doubting our men isn't a good way to go, we have a lot of experience with wars, and peacekeeping as well.
Edit: Also, war between UK and India is highly unlikely. Extremely Highly unlikely. And some of these numbers are wrong.
Sorry bro i dont think UK would help INDIA in any form just by looking at the track record, infact uk sided with Pakistan in 1971 war against INDIA (which INDIA won btw)
9:34 UK going to help India if war broke between India and China. And I don't trust UK in any way possible on this 😂😂😂.
India is not only quantity but also quality. Indian millitary is oneof the best and most advanced
Tech and vehicles are only one aspect of military power.
Fighting experience is a huge important factor when it comes to military power.
Yeah, and india has seen many wars, and also insurgencies, terrorism. So they have got huge fighting experience.
@@SuyashBajpai-k6z India fought a lot of wars in the 20th century but none in the last 25 years which matters for its current military age population. The insurgents facing Indian troops are no more threatening than street gangs. India never had to take entire regions lead alone cities that were occupied by insurgents. India has a long way to go and that's not just me saying that, top Indian officials in the Indian military agree.
India has a population of nearly 1.5 billion compared to 68 million in the UK
really? what about 45 trillion usd they looted from india
2025:
India ~1.46 Billion
UK ~70 Million
coincidentally, today PM modi is inducting 3 new naval assests of a destroyer,frigate and a diesel electric submarine today. so you can make it to 296 ships
Idk where he's getting the 900,000 reserve personnel from???.
As of January 2025, the UK Armed Forces have approximately 183,230 personnel, including both regular and reserve forces. This includes:
138,120 Regular Forces (across the Army, Navy, and RAF)
432,420 Volunteer Reserves
48,380 other personnel, including Gurkhas and Sponsored Reserves
4Specifically for the British Army:
Regular Army: 74,296 personnel (including 4,244 Gurkhas)
Army Reserve: 25,934 personnel
Brics>>>>>>Nato
1) Military
2)money
3)Population
4) economy
🇮🇳 🤝 🇬🇧 (except media) 😅
What about 100M+ indians who got murdered in the British era?
Also I'd be curious to see your response to habitual line crossers America versus the world series.
That would be awesome.
@@vampiro4236 recently he did one for all of NATO. And it is really interesting to me how the US is pretty much half of NATO's military capabilities
@ It's an unfortunate truth. I don't know how their export rules work as far as rules for supply they must have on hand, but I imagine their stockpiles are running mighty low because of all that's been sent to Ukraine.
Might be a goof time to invest in European and American munitions manufacturing, as I'm sure they're gonna be putting in large domestic orders (if they haven't already.)
India needs far more vehicles & craft because they have so much more territory to defend.
They ruled us but now the compony who ruled us which is East India Company which's CEO is an Indian now we are ruling them!
We know the British army is one of the best trained army in the world but dont forget India bases there army on the British model any way and in some ways harder plus because they have such a big population they can be picky on who they chose to join so the quality is gona be good right from the start ,were as England are struggling to re recruit
Not to forget that the indian military also has some hands on experience due to wars, and terrorism operations, or the UN peace keeping force.
Do you think Indian weapons are inferior then you better think twice. If you think British solders are superior then Indian then you better think twice as well. Without Nato , Britain is nowhere near to India. But both of India and Britain will never going to war. Indian weapons are of same or better quality then British. So search before commenting. I know in some domains we are behind but I hope in next ten years we will also cover that as well. India enemies are China, Pakistan and may be in future some other as well.
I didn’t know the UK had nearly 1M reserve soldiers
If it's is on Quality Than India already improved this at 2018 they already replaced all old weapons otherwise the number you seeing would had been more
And The Military rank are also done by Quality also not just Quantity
If it was in Quantity then Pakistan would had more upper rank because their military size is bigger than UK in mostly everthing
But this year in 2025 Pakistan miltary rank declined from 9th to 12th because of the quality and the operation they did
And India is at 4th is not just Quantity but also Quality and I say more advance and more well trained soliders and it's better
And I also wish both our nation keep good relation with each other
India's weapons and aircraft are purchased from France , america , israel and Russia so they are more advanced in technology whereas uk technology is not very good . Also troops or sliders of india are well trained and also give training to other Nations military so this is way better than uk in general ❤😂
India doesn't need anybody's help against China. We are self sufficient. They cannot fight for long in the mountains in which Indian Soldiers are outstanding.
9:27 if india china war happens , it wouldn't be india china , Pakistan will join too.... , then afganistan , Bangladesh too joins , russia will be neutral
WWIII
Afghanis hate pakistan
1:08 so true 💯💯
3:28 bro is maniac to say that 😂😂😂
India is still producing nuclear bombs, artillery, ballistic missile, navy ships and submarines, with new weapons been added in.
We do know, from many wars, including ww2, that QUALITY does not matter, only NUMBERS matter, just look at the lemming trains of russian soldiers, just there to drain the ammo from the germans, lol
or the weak shermans, before the got the bigger cannon from the UK.....1400 tigers 6000 panthers, vs 84 000t-34 and 50 000 sherman???? that is 134 000 tanks vs 7400 tanks......yea, numbers matter, it is the only thing that matters, just spam it out and overwhelm
Uk is not even close
The total fighter aircraft for the uk is wrong. They have 137 typhoons and 34 5th gen F-35Bs which is 171 in total
The English killed 80 million in india collectively west Europe killed over 500 million over 400 years still india and China is rising 😂
I mean let's ignore the fact that the UK is part of NATO and obviously America would get involved. So it realistically would be a steamroll. One on one would be kind of interesting as the UK has decently high-tech weapons and equipment. Compared to what India has but India does have numbers so the interesting thing about it in my opinion is while they have numbers that doesn't necessarily mean that they would win numbers isn't everything
I'm an American so my view on this might be a little bit skewed but I think it would be freaking hard but not impossible for the UK to win. The quality of the equipment and the soldiers would definitely be its own advantage and I'll just be honest with you I would take a platoon of UK troops over 2 platoons of Indian soldiers.
Strength and Honour! Haha
High tech like what? Give some examples compared to india.
@@NATION_FIRST_BRAVEHEARTSIndia has advanced weapons don’t get me wrong but the majority of them are still not as advanced as the NATO counterparts.
WTF 😂😂 are you talking about
I agree that India is sucks in jet engine technology and may be other weapons but Indian missile arsenal is far ahead of UK and china 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
Obviously (1) Russia
(2)usa
(3)India
(4)israel and china
Give me single example where India lacks in missile technology - nah never
India has 63 attack helicopters, not 40 , please update your data
India is country with most people in the entire world, so ofc they will have a huge army, a tiny percent for them will be a huge percent for the UK if to match direct numbers
Yeah but the economies are near identical (obviously not exactly the same but close enough) so they can both field the same amount of weapons . Hypothetically the UK could buy enough weapons for everyone but for India that would only be a small percentage . So talking about numbers it would come to a point where India would just be using men with sticks if that makes sense .
It doesn't matter how many machines any country has it is about maintaining them. The more you have the more it is difficult to maintain. That is why US is retiring old planes example the A10, destroying old aircraft carriers, and even some of their f22s. Too hard to maintain and keeping up with upgrades.
You should know quality is paramount in Indian defence forces on conparision to UK forces
You guys are not even worthy of comparison.But it's not a disrespect to your country but it's a fact. And the craziest part is No one can defeat us in our soil.
India successfully completed docking technology
About Your point of the quality and training of troops India regularly trains with Russia, Australia, US, UK, France, Japan. Joint Military, Naval and Air force trainings are a thing, let's say technologically UK is still superior in some things, as an Indian I will admit India's system are a mix bag of really advanced systems and old reliable equipments. But isn't that to be expected with a military that big and the recovering India needs to do? I don't think that a single IN soldier is that skillless compared to a single UK soldier especially since Indian troops under the UN's peace keeping force regulations do serve alongside the western and NATO nations also, no there won't be a war between India and UK. Let's be honest here nobody wants a war with anyone especially between 2 major powers no to mention nuclear capable opponent. (India has an advantage over UK in the Nuclear Triad there's only 4 countries in the world that have a nuclear triad- US, RUSSIA, CHINA AND INDIA. Nuclear triad is that a country is capable of launching nukes from- land, water and air.) Also, no one would actually wanna go on a direct open war with the most populated country in the world or the current strongest military alliance it's just stupid.
lol calm down. India's quality of training comes from its numerous MASSIVE wars fought in the last 80 years. India has fought 8 wars and won 7 of them, some of them at heights of 18000 ft +.
The world's largest bi lateral war victory since WW2 is India's (Indo-Pak War 1971).
Not to mention everyday operations on the world's most dangerous border.
In terms of technology , India is ahead in MOST areas. Be it superior warships, or superior air defence and artillery or superior missiles.
India doesn't need uk nato America help u need India ❤
Why do you do this? If you have any educational video then post it . Always India vs ... another country. Because you don't have anything else to do and you don't know anything. People in India make fun of you guys after watching your videos. 😂
Rushia is neutral because rushia best friend of india ❤
If this will happen and Nato comes in it will become a big geopolitical tension maybe big tension!
India has mostly Russian hardware and having masses of that hasn't done Russia any good against the kind of military tech Britain has. I can't imagine a scenerio in which India would attack Britain and that's the only scenerio in which NATO would be involved. India has one nuclear powered ballistic missile sub and it's a prototype. Britain has four Trident nuclear subs each with 16 Trident ICBMs. Each missile carries four warheads which can be independently targeted. That is Britain's sole nuclear force since the RAF no longer has any aircraft capable of carrying a nuclear bomb. India is modernizing it's military because of China, but they're beginning to realize that relying on Russian gear was a huge mistake. All those helicopters can't fly at the altitudes along the border with China and the Russian tanks also function very poorly in that area. Pakistan has an alliance with China and has allowed the Chinese to build a large port on their coast and build a modern road linking it with China. India is afraid that port will be used as a base for the Chinese Navy. That's why they're expanding their navy. I know many people in the UK still have an attachment to India, but I think India has largely forgotten that Britain exists. Time to move on.
I think you need some catching up to do when it comes to India's military.
There are already two ssbns in service with the navy (fully operational) and a third one on its way.
India has already developed and inducted the 'Prachand' attack helicopter with the highest service ceiling for use in the himalayas because both the Apache and the Hind in service with iaf struggle to operate in that environment.
A new light tank 'Zorawar' is in the later stages of development which is to be fielded in the himalayas.
India never forgot that Britain exists, look at the population of immigrants- in about 100 years it will be a colony of the Indian subcontinent.
5:45 These were land artillery!
You are saying that UK 🇬🇧 has NATO . But dont forget bro INDIA 🇮🇳 has BRICS , if u r going to bring US 🇺🇸 then we can bring RUSSIA 🇷🇺 and CHINA 🇨🇳 too.
Bro u keep talking about quality of soldiers but don't forget india have some of the best soldiers in the world
Quality of Indian soldiers are best in the world they have some special forces who are best in the world
america is a neto country yet talking about army control on another nato country grrenland
don't know about you but that itself gives me a clear picture about the strength & unity of nato😅😅😅
Hi 👋 namaste iam from India 🇮🇳. So amazing youtube channel nice 👍
Reached Scotland for studies at Strathclyde.
Damn UK has some wild cold winds
bro all of NATO is backed by USA , as if you exclude USA from NATO the numbers are still less from India , and now with donald trump he will exclude USA from NATO in near future , and dont forget if west have NATO , we have BRICS and the numbers and firepower of BRICS is unimaginable and way beyond of NATO to fight 😂😂😂
Lol this guy talking about NATO 😂😂😂😂 bro you really think all NATO members come to save you😂😂😂😂, I don't think so 😂😂😂
If u are talking about quality then india is not using chinese made things. ......
1:40 i wish we had 117 type 45s lol
Lol
Damn your country is waaaay behind and you here making fun of China every day 😂😂😂😂😂
One on one I am not sure if would be interesting, could be quite quickly overwhelmed by these numbers
yea you are right that UK has NATO but remember INDIA has BRICS..don't forget it.🧐
well BRICS is not a military partnership like the NATO, so even if india goes to war, brics countries are not obligated to help india. It depends on individual countries if they would help india or not. But on the other hand trump doesn't like nato so much, so if usa goes away from nato, then nato's power would go down exponentially.
Brics is not military alliance stupid
@@SuyashBajpai-k6z ok bet.
War between India and china would put Stalins statistic to shame.
In my opinion, and i know about stalingrad.
All I want to say is return our 64 triilon dollars which Britian have looted from India..
I think the only problem with relying on NATO for y'all is (without the US) you're partnering with many other European powers (except for Poland) who have let their military power dwindle. Which is also why we have such a metric F ton of kit and always more in development/production here in the US.
I really would love to see the British military aircraft industry come back in force. Y'all produced some beautiful birds (and the planes aren't bad either 🤪)
Don't forget about BRICS 🔥
Yeah... India would win this fight if they could keep logistics up.
I was in MLRS in the US Army and we had half of what Britain has in our motor pool alone, much less all of Fort Sill, Oklahoma. We got your back mate 👍🏻🇺🇸🇬🇧
Id love to see UK and India become partners and help each other out it would be great for UK as India's growing so fast France and USA and many other countries are trying for a piece of it, and i think France is ahead of UK they are about to do another Rafal deal ,and might give over 100% full tech on there Safran jet engines ,while RR in uk have refused so far ,and also France are looking into buying Indian missiles ,Macron is always going over there
France is wayy ahead in terms of partnerships with india, they are sharing so much of military technology, doing so many deals worth billions of dollars. On the other hand I don't see UK right now doing any considerable deal with the indians. imo france is way ahead of usa and uk or any other western counterparts. France easily comes in top 3 of india's partners
@ Its a shame with all the ties the UK has with India they couldn't see the potential
@@braddbradd5671problem with uk is it's under complete influence of usa. Atleast france maintain some autonomy regarding that so it's difficult for India to buy and trust from uk.European countries put embargo on artillery shells and parts during our previous wars but france didn't that's why france is ahead of uk in relationship with India and they didn't sanction us during nuclear tests .uk and us still kept sanctions intact on our civil nuclear deal programs. While russia builts nuclear power plants in India and french also help a little bit in that field with joint miniature nuclear reactors and then comes Israel who always stood by us as well
@@nidheeshkumar6760 Yeah i totally agree and France always had an interest in India and was an ally against the British ,its good to see they still want to be friends after 300 years shame the same cant happen in UK as there are so many Indians there
I believe UK will definitely help India against China if America gave them the order to do so
No offense just joking 😃
Our military is no more it's gone soft and so have the people the militaries we'd face are tough people living in what we call harsh conditions, their comfortable in a harsh environment as a country forget the military. Draft would be called and even woth nato it's all so complicated and drafted citizens of our countries arnt used to real hardship like the people they'd face. I don't think we'd stand a chance Germany had quality over quantity it worked for so long then russia began mass production of an effective tank land lease also and USA joined and mass produced cheap effective equipment like firefly sherwani with the British gun. Russia and China still have this ability we no longer do we're doing it the german way while they're sticking to what's always worked in a war of attraction.
(64 TRILLION DOLLARS FROM EAST INDIA COMPANY REPORT OXFAM) INDIA NOT POOR COUNTRY PAST AED Bharat not give up world third largest economy in tha future
they recovered so quickly by using cheap gas from Russia and cheap labor from China. All BRCI countries have been helping each other out for years and years. Sorry bud India and China resolved its border dispute at the last BRICS summit.
All residents of uk has two fathers one is biological other is uncle Sam(America). Uk has no spine of its own just a father nation America 😂
Bro! if you ae gonna bring NATO again n again then why even watch this comparision in the first place? India also has defence pact with Russia so we can also add Russia defence equipments too u know, what a time waste
Indian army has way more experience in war thn UK and that's excluding peacekeeping mission and Indian defense forces are one of the most renowned in the world thats why even YOU have a gorkha regiment. so yes you are being baised my dear friend.
Tuesday ❌ chuesday ✅
Watch Ukraine and Russian soldier hand to hand combat virl video
Doubt he will, he never reacts to anything that doesn't show Ukraine as the victor
Lol when you can't handle the pakistani immigrants😂😂UK is not eligible to fight even with ukraine like country😂❤❤❤
LOVE FROM INDIA 🧡🤍💚
Bro you gotta think. Depending on other people tp fight your fight is a bitch move. Let’s pretend the US finally gets tired of the monetary cost of d3fending other countries who spend elsewhere. For example most European countries have free healthcare at the cost of their defense🤷♂️ just saying . Also US gives monetary aid to a large amount of countries. I would think the savings of we quit defending other countries and givin* them aid could help the US pay of its debt pretty quickly. Just saying is a country really great if they depend on other countries for defense and monetary aid 🤷♂️. And at what point should the US stop or reduce its support
😂india never takes help of uk/usa
You go get some study bro. You know nothing. And UK is not part of NATO anymore. It's already been a while long. Good check it.
Uk is nowhere to India 🙂
Uk thread is Russia😅😅
UK and US relations is going to chang bcz of Trump . So forget that NATO thing.
india has a lot of aircraft but they are vastly outdated arcraft.
🇮🇳 🇬🇧 ❤
Lets me guess kingdom won
UK is jealous
UK's time is long gone my friend. This is gonna hurt a lot, USA is pretty much looking after you guys. The age of UK is long gone. You don't know the Indian soldiers my friend. It's not wise to compare the two with knowledge of one. I understand it hurts but you guys can't even go beyond the planet earth. A nation who has reached mars and moon, I don't think quality of machinery can be doubt. Going to space is tough.
Difference is we have better technology and modern
You are ignorant. Research and then make opinion.
I they have relatively better tech than us but they are on a downward path and we r on a upward path@@NATION_FIRST_BRAVEHEARTS
Yeah great now give an example
India literally has a lot more ground to cover with a military. Also a couple more people with the same education as the British.
React to the Indian Navy telefilm 2023 please
crazy early
Most driven assets are becoming more and more useless with the revolution of many kinds of drones used these days in war... so.. I dont even know how much useful many of these mobile assets will be even more when talking about land based assets..
Even aircraft carriers could become overwhelmed by a naval attack combined with water and air drones...
Where is usa and qhere is rendia begger compare with just lion and cqt begger indian