Play Conflict of Nations for FREE on PC, Android or iOS: 💥con.onelink.me/kZW6/ChineseNuclearA Receive an Amazing New Player Pack, only available for the next 30 days
do a vid about a modern Operation Barbarossa with both german wehrmacht and red army having modern tech and equipment with also more manpower and population and etc
you noted at 15:42 that russia has specialized warheads for SAM systems. I am not aware of any such system. As such Id like to request more info. Because that would be bat shit crazy
@@dr.chopper9302 Also USA had nuclear warhead equipped SAMs to late 1980s. Nike Zeus/Hercules. Appears Russia still has them operational in A-135 missiles. But they are and were meant against adversary's ballistic missiles, so should be called nuclear ABMs. Possibly there was a time when they were meant against bombers, at the time before ICBMs came and took the nuke carrying role from airplanes. One reason to use nukes has been the difficulty to hit a ballistic missile or it's re-entry vehicle. With nuke it's not so point-precise and a near miss will do fine.
I have a morbid curiosity to see how capable China’s military really is. However, considering the circumstances in which we would likely find out, I’m perfectly fine not knowing.
Well considering they haven't fought a conventional war since what the 50's they probably wouldn't be too capable yet. The days of huge numbers running across open fields are over as the Ukraine war has shown.
@@DuoTheGodOfDeath It's likely gonna be a naval war so we're gonna see PLAN ships fresh out of the dockyard with green sailors, and somewhat aging USN ships with tons of exercise experience, and has time to simulate war games with China as the hypothetical enemy. My bet is on the US It's funny to find out the the USN actually simulated the Japanese would bomb Pearl Harbor during one of these war games before WW2 even started. How much they've analyzed the Chinese today, only they know.
@@madensmith7014 Yes, the US aircraft carriers will be greeted by the carrier killers. The carrier battle group will be greeted by swarms of armed drones and under water drones. And don't forget the hypersonic missiles.
Just a small word of advice from someone who's briefed weapon systems capabilities in the past. Try to incorporate a different color or line type (dashed/non dashed) for each weapon system when you are visually presenting them to viewer. It helps make things clear. I had a hard time seeing what weapon system had what range on the last slide there. Very good video though. Thanks for the work on it!
China needs to ramp-up its nuke arsenal, say 2500, to match the US's nuke stockpile for good measure, given that the USA only respect the power of the gun, in this case large numbers of nuke arsenal. The fact that Russia has more nuke warheads than the USA has pre-empted the US-led NATO from waging a full scale direct war with Russia, even though Russia has a much weaker conventional military force than China. Therefore, maintaining large number of nuke arsenal has become a necessary means to keep the US's aggression in check because a war with China can only means MAD, which is unacceptable to the rulers in DC.
@@darrylmuse9948 That's the real reason why the USA is so frightened of China as these missiles can be manufactured enmass in large quantities, very cheaply, and of super sonic speed.
@@donhuang9855 man you smoking some good stuff if you think we are scared of China.And the USMC isn’t scared of shit we always looking for a fight and our enemies fear the Marines in combat because they know what we are capable of doing we bring hell with us when we go to combat
@@darrylmuse9948 Of course, people on Earth are very scare of the Devils (US Marines) because they are always bringing HELL with them where ever they are roaming the world looking for more Humans to slay. However, thus far, these evil US marines had been fighting many 3rd world rag-tag militia forces in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Algeria, Africa, etc. But fighting the Mighty Chinese Army is a different ball game because it will only means MAD, if shove comes to push. You have been warned, and it's time to CAP the shenanigans of US Marines around the world. I wasn’t saying BOO, I am saying BOO-URNS!!!!
@@donhuang9855 We go where there’s trouble.And we are devil dogs .And you talk about those countries they start shit with America we finish it our job is to kill and we are damn good at it .And as for China not combat proven hell there a video showing Chinese troops crying .China want some they can get some and we are quite capable of handling them on the battlefield and will hand them their asses.
For Fallout fans it is both terrifying and interesting to watch the world follow the timeline of the game, largely. I wonder if the devs will adapt the lore to fit in current wars and developments, to make the timeline seem more rooted in real life. Until now everything makes sense. Onward to 2077. But i fear 2077 is an optimistic year for the end. Sooner seems more realistic
When I saw the title saying the chinese nuclear arensal exploding, for a second I didn't realize it is exploding in the metaphorical sense... As a Chinese (hker) you can guess how unnerving it sounds lol
Also if humanity manages to survive and rebuild from a nuclear war, there's a high chance they won't be able to re-industrialize since all the easily accessible natural resources like coal and oil deposits close to the surface would have already been consumed.
Nah someone always sirvives with solar panels batteries and starlink and some cheap factories. China needs to make factories around the planet that can make anything fast and cheap with tesla like tesla chkna gigs factories that can make anything
A lot of the data you’re using and the assumptions you’re making are quite old. The DF-31AG is a MIRV version with 3 warheads fitted and the DF-41 can carry up to 10 warheads although 3-6 is the standard, with the rest of the space taken up by penetration aids. I’d also be very surprised if the PLARF is producing any more DF-5 missiles, the B & C models being upgrades of existing missiles to improve accuracy and offensive power, as the missiles themselves still have enough service life in them to make an upgrade worthwhile.
The highest military expenditure in the world is the United States, and it is also the United States that has the most military bases in other countries, but why has no one come to point out the American threat to the world? Is the United States in a different world? It's really ridiculous
lol what? the U.S. is a beacon of freedom and hope. the chinese steal others' technology, execute its citizens for the most mundane of crimes, and has a gdp per capita of 13,000 vs 70,000 for each american. cry
@@deveryhenderson8335 lmao beacon of freedom and hope? Who helped Pakistan against India in the 1960s? Who started the most wars? Tell that to all the people killed in America’s wars overseas. Beacon of freedom as long as it benifits Uncle Sam.
How is the USA a "threat to the world"? The USA has loads of allies. Why? Because they know the USA *protects them*. Do you think anyone in Asia is worried about being invaded by the evil USA monsters? The USA has had the power to conquer and claim almost anyone for 50+ and didn't do it!
It all seems so pointless. Who cares who is "ahead"? What leader would even be willing to sacrifice a single city, let alone dozens or hundreds, and somehow think you have won an exchange like that? Even if you obliterate the enemy and only lose half your own country... you've lost half your country. You can't just reconquer it, it's gone forever.
Whether you have 10 or 10,000 it ant squat unless you use them. And if you use it, it’s your death 15 minutes later. So its just a big bluff because no one would be alive to argue otherwise. 🔥🤣
Thank you for the detailed report. Why were the Chinese captions censored in the images where the missiles were on parade? To avoid a copyright strike from the Chinese news network the images were taken from?
A good way to measure a country’s potential power to deliver missiles is their space program. A space rocket is an ICBM that’s used for civilian purposes. So far in history, there’s been two countries that have decades of experience launching into space, to orbit earth or to reach other planets. Those countries being the US and Russia. China has a very young space program, but I’m sure they’re learning as they go further into space.
@@stevemrayz357 ok wrong choice of words, then I would say delayed? The US and Russia have sent rovers to Mars and Venus in the 60’s and 70’s. I don’t believe China has sent a rover that far yet, although technically all 3 nations started their space program at the same time.
@@Tonymontanayayo Delayed would be a better term. The Chinese have an active Martian rover, "Zhurong". There have been no rovers sent to Venus by anyone, only landings
@@sadiqahmed4143 I know very well of their recent achievements…. I meant historically, the US and Russia have a longer history of space exploration, landing rovers on Mars and Venus back in the 70’s….
The word here is *hundreds*… *”People's Liberation Army General Zhu Chenghu, a professor at China's National Defense University, admitted that his view was not official policy. Even so, he was speaking before a group of foreign journalists. "If the Americans are determined to intervene [in China's internal affairs] we will be determined to respond." According to the Financial Times he also said, "We ... will prepare ourselves for the destruction of all the cities east of the Xian. Of course the Americans will have to be prepared that hundreds ... of cities will be destroyed by the Chinese."* a clear give away, *my opinion*, of what China’s arsenal really is… In addition, in the turn of millennium, a U of Singapore study suggested the Chinese should have a stockpile of 2400 units. Similarly, a George Washington U study (2010 I think) also suggests China arsenal should be in the neighbourhood of somewhere between 2500 to 3000 warheads while… A recent report by Russia suggests China’s arsenal should be what both the U of Singapore and the George Washington U suggested… .
Great catch! Knowing the fact that the Chinese military s patterned after the Russian military with EVEN more corruption, such as pay for rank in the PLA etc...how operational are the nukes they have should be the main question?
if China and Russia can shoot down incoming US nukes, and US can't shoot down incoming Chinese or Russian nukes, that's a game changer. then the MAD doctrine no longer applies.
@@JukemDrawles87 things are possible if you put your mind to it. Communist countries place heavy focus on education, unlike US that's more focused on being woke and using the right pronouns.
China now has 947 nuclear warheads in stockpile and it has plan to build 1000 new warheads in five years from now on, so it will have around 2000 nuclear warheads in stockpile in the year of 2027.
The number of warheads is misleading. China may have 1/10 the number of warhead of USA, but has 36% of the USA if you compare the total yield of their nukes. USA: 820 megaton total China: 294 megaton total China simply have fewer larger yield warhead.
yea because a lot in those ~6000 warheads possessed by the usa (and russia) are low yield tactical warheads china goes all in for strategic nukes, and for retaliation alone (no first strike policy)
@Saint FluffySnow Anyone from whichever side who is screaming "other side is shit, other side shit BRUHAHA WE ARE GREATEST" etc. In this comments section they are mostly Americans, but they can vary depending on the video.
There becomes a point at which more doesn't yield any benefit. Have enough to survive a few covert sub kills, and any missle defense systems. A hundred beyond that is more than enough. Any more is just for show.
Only a fool would underestimate China, but globally it's a stalemate. No one can invade China. China can't invade out of the box it's in. I'm happy to keep things that way.
@@Jagonath nobody wants to invade China..... only after threatening Taiwan and other neighbors the Americans started looking into this. There is not an Asian country that trusts the ccp.
@@joshuabonilla3491 what has trust to do with trade? Besides you dont trade with the CCP you trade with a Chinese company. Why dont you check your facts, nothing I said you cannot find on the internet yourself: nobody likes the ccp.
@@kevinw2592 The internet might survive but it will be a mostly southern hemisphere led project. After a nuke war all out chaos would break out in the North. Governments would either collapse or become north korean in behaviour. So a heavily regulated borderline impossible internet would emerge. I know what postnuke countries would be like. Democracy dies the day the nukes fall.
As I grow older it becomes more interesting of a question to me, will WW3 happen first or will we as a species come together and actually work toward the collective continuation of our species. As of November 2022 I am sure that is a stupid question. However I still have a small sliver of faith in humanity, we might actually look outward and understand this little rock really should not be our end. Collectively we have the capacity to at the very least make this solar system a reality, we just need to stop thinking so small. We shall see...
I’ve read that while the Chinese have fewer warheads their average yield is much higher. With US large MIRV warheads having a yield of 300 to 475 kilotons. Where as the Chinese warhead may average 1.2 megatons. Meaning China’s warhead estimate underestimate their total nuclear yield (warheads x average yield). Putting China at around 294 MT and US at between 1300 and 1500 MT total yield (depending on number of low yield tactical nukes).
It looks like that smaller but more newclear war heads will be more efficient? as if you launch it to cities, the buildings will minimize the kill zone
Binkov mentioned in the video the Chinese miniaturization is closer to the US’s back in the 1960s. So only now are they investing the resources for more warheads and to make them smaller for more effective MIRVs.
DF-41 is not a replacement for DF-5. DF-5 (C variant) will continue to form the core of China's silo-based ICBM in the future, as it can carry higher yield warheads in greater quantities.
However, the intercontinental ballistic missiles in active service in the United States are also the technology of the 1970s and have not been updated. This is true whether it is the Trident or the Minuteman 3 missile. And Minuteman 3 can only rely on fixed silos, which is very inconvenient, similar to DF5
They'd win any negotiation they enter. When you have that kind of firepower, and your enemies have no defense for it, after one or two crushing engagements, most people would want to cut there losses and negotiate.
They could just ISR all important state and military staff at there headquarters and drop a few GBUs with their B-2s. Then drop parachute tablets over enemy unis with pictures of the dead generals filmed with a modern satellite. Won.
Theres one very likely scenario - China can just purchase Russian reserve stockpiles as well as platforms - in return for economic aid to Russia. - Legally as both are already nuclear powers there is much smaller obstacles geopolitically. - It will be mutually beneficial; for China to acquire more capabilities from system such as the SARMAT and Borei class SSBN and for Russia to maintain its military industrial complex - It is relatively available and quick. China can attain thousands of nuclear warheads and multiple new platforms within 2-5 years and Russia fast access to perserve its economy.
If any given country has, say, 500 fixed targets, between major military assets and major cities then 1500 effective warheads will suffice as deterrent. You can have 5000 warheads but then you can kill your enemy only once. Focus should be in making the warheads unstoppable and having a reliable dead hand trigger. Hopefully, we will never know.
Greater numbers allow for a simple solution to enemy defense capabilities. Simply put, if China can produce several thousand, they could satirate their enemies defenses by sheer numbers.
Does it even matter beyond a few hundred warheads on 100-200 missiles? That is enough of a deterrent to assure that neither side will risk launching a nuclear attack against the other side (unless they are crazy, in which case the number of weapons doesn't matter either).
No, there's a huge difference between 2000 warhead and 200 warheads. Ukraine had 2000 warheads and West made her give them up in 1990s when USSSR was collapsing
@@borghorsa1902 But from a strategic standpoint, does it matter if you have 200 warheads or 2000 warheads, assuming you can deliver some of them to their targets?
@@Djamonja Yes it matters a lot coz Ballistic missile defence systems have improved tremendously. When you are facing a cunning warmonger like the US which uses surrounding countries as meat shields, placing BMD systems and submarine bases on their soils to box you in, you better have thousands of nukes+ ICBMs to deliver them. Even better if you convert 40% of them into hypersonic glide vehicles and Hypersonic cruise missiles. US is ganging up on China, but the gangsters around China are well aware of just how capable China is, barring the stupid Indian call centre scammers, no one else is ready to commit to total war just yet, maybe Japan is crazy enough/slave enough to atleast prepare but when push comes to shove even they will stand down especially when China reaches the magic number of nuke warheads which is 1500.
@@Bk6346 You do realize that if two countries shoot several hundred nuclear weapons at each other, we're all screwed right? There is no winner, we all lose.
This is nothing but an estimation . What he don’t to tell you is that China has over 6000 miles of tunnels . I’m willing to bet you that China has over 1500 war head all ready .
@@CrasusC 1983 Nuclear Sub Type 092 with 12 nukes x 1 sub = 12 nukes 2004 Type 094 Sub with 12 nukes each with 4 Mirvs x 6 subs = 12x4x6= 288 nukes 2020 Type 096 sub with 18 nukes each with 12 mirvs x 8 subs = 1,728 nukes Grand Total of Submarine Nukes is 2,208 That's 2,208 nukes just in their submarines and they are all new.
@@johnsmith1953x … assuming each silo actually has a missile and associated warhead… a big “IF”. The PLA doesn’t actually publish information about their nuclear arsenal, there is no way for you to know for sure. The Pentagon estimates that China would amass 700 warheads by 2027. You think you know better than US DoD?
Total number of functional russian nuclear devices 75.. total number that could be readied within 48 hours 114 ... total number needing remonetised .. 1000s
@@JukemDrawles87 That’s why no one fires a nuke at USA. It’s call MAD mutual assured destruction. But for the same reason USA won’t attack Russia or China.
It depends on the definition of "destroy" If you mean the governemmt/high military organization Then just a few houndreds are enough... But if you mean destroy ANY type of politic, military or civilian power, so the country cant reorganize in the next 1000 years... Then it would take thousands of bombs
@@bogotnukes379 Really kid ? China and Russia will make US disappear ! Learn something kid instead of moving your stupid mouth ! That's what kids are good for !
regardless if China Surpasses the USA in military production they have basically 3 allies in the world. It would be perhaps NOKO, China and what's left of Russia. Expect Russia to switch sides like they did in WW2.
You seem to forget US government leaders spent DECADES antagonizing their Russian counterparts, including delivering outright threats- how else is Putin to interpret Biden's demand he be removed from power? If the US goes to war against China, Russia will AT LEAST offer to sell China munitions at a discount, and "volunteers" to fight against a mutual enemy (which is the US), out of spite.
The U.S. releases various ridiculous reports on the number of China’s nuclear warheads every year to infer the number of China’s nuclear warheads based on China’s response. They deliberately underestimate the number of China’s nuclear warheads every time to test China’s response. The latest report points out that China has 400 nuclear warheads. Good joke, just use basic IQ to calculate that China has at least thousands of nuclear warheads
@@Abhi-ly7nr You just have to remember the report is hilarious, I'm sure by this time next year the US will say that China has 800 nuclear warheads, do you know why they do it? Because they know that China has at least thousands of nuclear warheads, just to ask Congress for money, they will hype it step by step
@@Abhi-ly7nr If you want to mobilize production in an all-round way, it can be done, but in fact, these do not need to be concerned by civilians, because the country has many specialized mathematics talents who can calculate roughly how many nuclear warheads need to be produced through reasonable calculations.
@@Abhi-ly7nr China has a 5,000-kilometer underground nuclear Great Wall. In fact, there are still many unannounced weapons, so what really protects the country is not the weapons you think
How the Serb army escaped Nato 'They came out to villages when they wanted to, they hid when the weather was good' Nato commanders, not to say political leaders, became increasingly frustrated by their inability to destroy Serb units. It was known that Yugoslavia had built an extensive system of underground shelters for its troops, guns and aircraft - a relic of President Tito's era, in preparation for a possible invasion by the Soviet Union. Many of its camouflage techniques, including the use of dummy weapons emplacements, the Serbs had learned from the russians. Critics of the bombing campaign also said mistakes were the inevitable result of Nato's policy of restricting its pilots to bombing from 15,000 feet or above - a policy dictated not least by political considerations, notably Washington's determination to avoid horrified public reaction to the sight of "bodybagsss coming home. Yet when the western media saw the Serb military withdraw from Kosovo in early June, they saw convoys of Serb tanks, armoured cars, guns, trucks and military equipment untouched by Nato's air assault. Nato's bombing campaign, with thousand of sorties and the dropping of tens of thousands of bombs, including sophisticated precision weapons, succeeded in damaging just 13 of the Serbs' 300 battle tanks in Kosovo. The Serbs had 50 marines In their care and that's the reason why it stopped and think USA hid behind NATO for small serbia And still never won.. Have a great day or night depending where you are...
The Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union plunged the world into serious confrontation and serious nuclear risk for half a century, which was a disaster for other countries. The limited self-defense capability of nuclear weapons is enough to prevent the outbreak of nuclear war. The earth is not only a few nuclear powers such as the United States, Russia, China, Britain and France, but also more than 100 other non-nuclear countries. These countries do not want to be involved in a great power confrontation or nuclear war, so nuclear weapons are for self-defense, not aggression. Nor can it be used as a weapon to coerce other nations, merely as a means to avoid the outbreak of a large-scale war between great powers. There is only one earth. It is a home for human life, learning and common progress, rather than a battlefield for conflicts between major countries.
That mentality its one of the worst, yeah today they have 300 but what about 10 years in the future? 2500? 3000? even maybe 3500? ICBM's, never underestimate a crazy paranoid dictator
@@atatatatatagsad why anyone needs 2500? with just 1000 you already don't need any deliver system, just detonate the nukes where you store them, and the entire earth is gone...................
well yea china could produce more on another note, the recorded ~6000 warheads of the usa and russia included a lot of low yield tactical nukes, so the actual number of strategic nukes are actually lower, probably several thousands less
People repeat the same silly claim as if it's an indisputable fact. There are nowhere near enough nuclear weapons to kill every single person on Earth. Most missiles are pointed at military targets, and a typical city would require a dozen or so warheads to completely level it. The biggest killer would be starvation following the collapse of supply chains and agriculture after a large nuclear exchange, but if you prepare ahead of time and buy non perishables you can definitely survive this. Also, nuclear winter is a fantasy. Volcanic eruptions and wildfires kick up way more dust into the atmosphere than airburst nuclear detonations, and all but the largest eruptions cause any significant degree of global cooling. Most of the world would survive an all out nuclear war.
You need more for redundancy. The USA might be able to shoot down incoming ICBM or sink Chinese nuclear submarines. Having 12 nuclear submarines will make harder for the USA to stop a nuclear attack.
In terms of Nukes it’s Russia 1, China 2 and USA 3. Russia has beat delivery systems and by far most nuclear weapons in serviceZ. Russia pulled out of STARTII. Russia has over 2000 strategic missile delivery systems and 6000-1000 tactical nukes. China has 500-1000 strategic weapons likely and better ICBMs. USA basically has Trident and shitty minute man 3 with over 1000 weapons.
@TheGrindcorps That's a negative. If you read through the entire documented report, you would see they concluded that the US has garnered its nuclear weaponry advancement to be faster as well as more inexpensive to their Russian counterparts, as well as more affluence to upgrade current fielded nuclear assets of which the US has more and a current in house modernization process struck for 2029. As for China, they can't even state their gdp properly as stated by their own late Premier who said that china's gdp was false, and he had to dig into electricity usage and agricultural consumption to try and find what chinas actual gdp. Their want on claims of nuclear power are precarious at best. With 8 or 9 high officials being "let go" for corruption and replacing said missiles feul with water or other liquids. There's a reason their own society called them "tofu dregs". Because everything you see is might as well be made of it.
@@itsreapernecrosis2215 lol. Russia has all those capabilities in their nukes but the delivery systems are much better, as I said. They also have 6,000 deployable tactical nukes which really tilts things in their favor. They can be deployed on all kinds of missiles beyond what used to be limited under START.
I tell you why...I am from South East Asia...I see so much propaganda bullshits..by western..main stream media....I decided to defend the truth...not China....
"Chinese bots" is such a dumb trope. At least "Wumao" made more sense conceptually even if it was overused. The Chinese government wouldn't make bots to post on youtube. It probably wouldn't even pay people to do it. They have a billion people who buy their ideology and will do it for free.
Why are people mocking each other in the comments in defense/attack of X country? Dude, they don't care, and certainly won't even bat an eye when you turn into ashes from a nuclear explosion, let's discuss the military aspects
No one thinks China is building nukes to attack. But the risk is, the more they have, the more likely it is China will use them. It's the exact same problem with US military power. The USA doesn't "plan" to attack anyone. But the more power they have, the more often they suddenly decide "Now we can invade country XYZ... and win!" It will be exactly the same with China.
In short, China's nuclear arsenal does not need to catch up with that of the United States. The reason is very simple. The effect of destroying one time is the same as destroying it a hundred times.
The reason for more is redundancy. The USA might be able to shoot down incoming Chinese nuclear missiles or sink a Chinese nuclear submarine. Having more nuclear bombs will make it harder for the USA to stop or defend against a nuclear attack from China.
The US currently has over ten times the number of nukes as China but with one fifth the population and a GDP about the same. With China's economy still growing at up to 10% per annum that means that it should double in size by 2030 so I would be very surprised if their nuclear arsenal DIDN'T at least double in the same period. In all respects then - total population, total economy size and GDP per head I can't see why China shouldn't increase their arsenal by 5-6 times in the next 10 years. The US is just scared because for the first time since the 1980s another nation may be able to match it in strength and power.
But their GDP didn't grow up by 10% since 2012. This year it's only 3-4% and current (Western) estimates suggest it'll stay this way in the near future. This doesn't mean their nuclear arsenal won't grow, but it's not going to be as cheap and easy for them as you suggest.
Iraq Ilbya given up Nuclear bomb programs resulting US NATO bomb both countries to stone age. NK seen the evil of US NATO EU hegemonic atrocities to Iraq and Libya that's why he will never give up his Nuclear bomb very smart.🙏🙏
US and Russia should both voluntarily lower their stockpile to under 500 each. Then a world wide nuclear weapons reduction process can start. But as long as these two countries maintain overwhelming stockpiles themselves, no one is going to be sincere about reducing nuclear weapons.
The number is irrelevant it's about the quality/power of the warhead if they would agree on reducing the one with a processing advantage would simply replace older models with way more powerful new ones, beside that the whole reason they didn't go to war was mutual nuclear destruction.
@@jc.1191 Regarding the current conflict i think with the low amount of troops in the field till recently, they did quiet a "good" job, ukraine got assistance worth the russian military budget times 4 by now, the russian airstrikes against military targets where successful but now the ukrainian army gets trained in other countries etc. - Regarding russia not agreeing, they are fully aware that the usage of nukes against a NATO member would mean the end and i hope NATO is also aware of that so they dont get more stupid ideas.
@@bytpokornykareem8897 Lol so are you wishing for real war to happen? You want to experience suffering? You want your loved ones to experience suffering? You want humanity to end as we know it? Because if you do, maybe its just you... Why don't you go to war with China yourself, while we peacefully watch you eat Chinese rubber bullets? That (your foolishness and stupidity) will kill our boredom for a little while 🥱
"It is likely China had help." From the good old USA. Wikipedia's entry on Qian Xuesen for example: "During the Second Red Scare, in the 1950s, the US federal government accused him of communist sympathies. In 1950, despite protests by his colleagues, he was stripped of his security clearance ... he was released in 1955 in exchange for the repatriation of American pilots who had been captured during the Korean War ... Upon his return, he helped lead the Chinese nuclear weapons program. This effort ultimately led to China's first successful atomic bomb test and hydrogen bomb test, making China the fifth nuclear weapons state, and achieving the fastest fission-to-fusion development in history. Additionally, Qian's work led to the development of the Dongfeng ballistic missile and the Chinese space program. For his contributions, he became known as the "Father of Chinese Rocketry", nicknamed the "King of Rocketry"."
Considered to be one of the greatest failures of the U.S. Navy, the Formosa Expedition (or the Paiwan War) of 1867 witnessed the retreat of U.S. forces 1812 lost to the brits and signed a declaration in 1814 The Battle of Powder River was fought on March 17th, 1876 in what is now the U.S. state of Montana. The event witnessed an embarrassing defeat. The United States lost another war to Native American forces in the Red Cloud’s War. Waged between 1866 and 1868, Considered to be one of the greatest failures of the U.S. Navy, the Formosa Expedition (or the Paiwan War) of 1867 witnessed the retreat of U.S. forces the Second Battle of Vailele on April 1st, 1899, during the Second Samoan War (1898-1899), the combined British, American, and Samoan forces loyal to Samoan Prince Tanu, were defeated by the Samoan rebels loyal to Mata'afa Iosefo, a Paramount Chief of Samoa, at Vailele in Samoa. The United States, as a participant in the Allied intervention during the Russian Civil War of 1918, was forced to withdraw its troops after being unable to achieve the target of empowering the anti-Bolshevik "White" forces to fight against "Red" Bolshevism in Russia. In the aftermath of the First World War, the Allied forces launched a multi-national expedition with the initial target to aid the Czechoslovak Legion to secure its trade position in the Russian ports, as well as to strengthen their Eastern Front. However, the Allied forces had to retreat when factors like a lack of domestic support, dilution of initial goals, and war-weariness started to turn the mission of Allied intervention into an unsuccessful one. Ultimately, the Reds defeated the Whites. The Korean War (1950-1953) can be considered as a major defeat for the United States, the loss of soldiers and planes, russia and china got involved the end was for the United states. The United States suffered a major defeat in the not-so-distant past during the Bay of Pigs Invasion in Cuba. On April 17th, 1961, Brigade 2506, a U.S. CIA-sponsored paramilitary group, attempted to invade Cuba and overthrow the Cuban communist government headed by Fidel Castro, the famous Cuban politician and revolutionary. However, the Cuban Revolutionary Armed Forces, headed by Castro himself, severely defeated the United States' The Vietnam War (1955-1975) is a black-marked event in the histories of both Vietnam and the United States, and one when the latter country, after losing thousands of soldiers in the war, was effectively badly defeated and forced to retreat. in serbia was not a win with NATO and stealths were not invisible a 80 year old with a old cannon popped it down with many others and did 0 damage to any serbian military weapons. Also lost to Canada Lost with NATO to syria Lost with NATO to Afghanistan Left all their weapons, aircrafts everything Lost trillions Lost billions Left their civilians behind Before they ran out 25 marines went to sleep Permanently at Kabul airport and scores beyond repair. Oh cant forget about clusters last stand USA and british chased out from the India- Pakistan waters in The 70a USA Run Away From. Fast And hide behind NATO. But USA did win against Grenada and took 3 weeks to win against 1000 guys and USA wins in Hollywood movies Have a great day or night depending where you are..
Chinese dictator Xi Jingping said on state media: "China has never invaded or bullied others"...HAHAHA!! China lost to Vietnam in 1979. They invaded Vietnam in full support of the genocidal Khmer rouge regime as the Vietnamese army was fighting them in Cambodia. The reserve bodies (not the Vietnamese army) stopped the PLA and drove them back with enormous material and personnel losses. China has invested heavily in hiding that humilliating defeat from its own people. Can you imagine going to school in America and not knowing about the Vietnam war? Well, that's exactly what going to school in China is like. This war is NOT in the state news. It's never mentioned by the media, and it's not even in their history books. In fact, China actually had 2 wars with Vietnam in the 70s. They seized the crescent group of the Paracel islands, after which they invaded the Vietnamese mainland. Let's review history, but only the recent history, so only from 1949 onwards: - In 1949, China annexed East Turkistan, now called Xinjiang, under the excuse that it has been a part of China "since ancient times", with the only proof being a pair of fleeting mentions in very old texts. - In 1950, China invaded Tibet. The Chinese government doesn't recognize it as an invasion but the Tibetan surely do, and still call for their freedom to this day. - In 1962, China invaded India and seized the border region of Aksai Chin, an area the size of Switzerland. They also attempted to seize Arunachal Pradesh, but ultimately failed. - In 1969, the Chinese launched an attack on the Soviet army due to a disagreement over the Zhenbao island, located in a river between China and the USSR. - In 1979, China invades Vietnam and loses. - In 1996, after a Taiwanese election, china deploys and fires missiles in the province of Fujian, in order to intimidate Taiwan into adhering to the "One china policy" - 5 of may of 2020, Chinese forces invaded India by entering the Galwan valley, making the first time shots were fired between both superpowers. - In 2022, China launches missiles over Taiwan, conducts live fire exercises around the island, and violates Taiwanese airspace several times, in an obvious attempt to intimidate them after a US official state visit. Several more officials have visited the island since, but the Chinese have not conducted further exercises. And they will still deny their history of lies and aggression to this very day...
The Puppet is cute for something as serious as nuclear weapons. Thanks for sharing your thoughts. What the Chinese needed are about 40,000 ICBM, but just 300 nukes. They just need a
Not to forget that china has not invaded or interfere militarily for a long time unlike those who accuse the chinese of being barbaric or being on a war path.
@@erikzhukovsky9742 Yeah that's because they didn't possess the military power to do that now they steal everything around them ...try to stay up to date Einstein
@@mastermariner490 As a Southeast Asian, I think the nuclear blackmail of the US against third world countries is much more than that of China. But white people still regard USA as pure as God. 😅
@@huas5350 Please tell us how many times US have threatened to use nuclear weapons against third world countries, in comparison to Russias weekly threats. Go ahead little mao
@@fatdoi003 Nobody yet,only US used the atom bomb in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Todays nuclear weapons are 100 times more powerful Anything else little wumao whataboutism
Play Conflict of Nations for FREE on PC, Android or iOS:
💥con.onelink.me/kZW6/ChineseNuclearA
Receive an Amazing New Player Pack, only available for the next 30 days
do a vid about a modern Operation Barbarossa with both german wehrmacht and red army having modern tech and equipment with also more manpower and population and etc
Talk about India
Please make one of zuhai air show
you noted at 15:42 that russia has specialized warheads for SAM systems. I am not aware of any such system. As such Id like to request more info. Because that would be bat shit crazy
@@dr.chopper9302 Also USA had nuclear warhead equipped SAMs to late 1980s. Nike Zeus/Hercules. Appears Russia still has them operational in A-135 missiles. But they are and were meant against adversary's ballistic missiles, so should be called nuclear ABMs. Possibly there was a time when they were meant against bombers, at the time before ICBMs came and took the nuke carrying role from airplanes.
One reason to use nukes has been the difficulty to hit a ballistic missile or it's re-entry vehicle. With nuke it's not so point-precise and a near miss will do fine.
I have a morbid curiosity to see how capable China’s military really is. However, considering the circumstances in which we would likely find out, I’m perfectly fine not knowing.
Well considering they haven't fought a conventional war since what the 50's they probably wouldn't be too capable yet. The days of huge numbers running across open fields are over as the Ukraine war has shown.
That would be KINO!!!
@@DuoTheGodOfDeath It's likely gonna be a naval war so we're gonna see PLAN ships fresh out of the dockyard with green sailors, and somewhat aging USN ships with tons of exercise experience, and has time to simulate war games with China as the hypothetical enemy. My bet is on the US
It's funny to find out the the USN actually simulated the Japanese would bomb Pearl Harbor during one of these war games before WW2 even started. How much they've analyzed the Chinese today, only they know.
@@madensmith7014 Yes, the US aircraft carriers will be greeted by the carrier killers. The carrier battle group will be greeted by swarms of armed drones and under water drones. And don't forget the hypersonic missiles.
US don't encourage/start proxy wars challenge (IMPOSSIBLE)
Just a small word of advice from someone who's briefed weapon systems capabilities in the past. Try to incorporate a different color or line type (dashed/non dashed) for each weapon system when you are visually presenting them to viewer. It helps make things clear. I had a hard time seeing what weapon system had what range on the last slide there.
Very good video though. Thanks for the work on it!
China needs to ramp-up its nuke arsenal, say 2500, to match the US's nuke stockpile for good measure, given that the USA only respect the power of the gun, in this case large numbers of nuke arsenal. The fact that Russia has more nuke warheads than the USA has pre-empted the US-led NATO from waging a full scale direct war with Russia, even though Russia has a much weaker conventional military force than China. Therefore, maintaining large number of nuke arsenal has become a necessary means to keep the US's aggression in check because a war with China can only means MAD, which is unacceptable to the rulers in DC.
There’s a problem with those missiles they say Made in China 😂😂
@@darrylmuse9948 That's the real reason why the USA is so frightened of China as these missiles can be manufactured enmass in large quantities, very cheaply, and of super sonic speed.
@@donhuang9855 man you smoking some good stuff if you think we are scared of China.And the USMC isn’t scared of shit we always looking for a fight and our enemies fear the Marines in combat because they know what we are capable of doing we bring hell with us when we go to combat
@@darrylmuse9948 Of course, people on Earth are very scare of the Devils (US Marines) because they are always bringing HELL with them where ever they are roaming the world looking for more Humans to slay. However, thus far, these evil US marines had been fighting many 3rd world rag-tag militia forces in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Algeria, Africa, etc. But fighting the Mighty Chinese Army is a different ball game because it will only means MAD, if shove comes to push. You have been warned, and it's time to CAP the shenanigans of US Marines around the world. I wasn’t saying BOO, I am saying BOO-URNS!!!!
@@donhuang9855 We go where there’s trouble.And we are devil dogs .And you talk about those countries they start shit with America we finish it our job is to kill and we are damn good at it .And as for China not combat proven hell there a video showing Chinese troops crying .China want some they can get some and we are quite capable of handling them on the battlefield and will hand them their asses.
For Fallout fans it is both terrifying and interesting to watch the world follow the timeline of the game, largely. I wonder if the devs will adapt the lore to fit in current wars and developments, to make the timeline seem more rooted in real life. Until now everything makes sense.
Onward to 2077.
But i fear 2077 is an optimistic year for the end. Sooner seems more realistic
When I saw the title saying the chinese nuclear arensal exploding, for a second I didn't realize it is exploding in the metaphorical sense... As a Chinese (hker) you can guess how unnerving it sounds lol
Nobody wins a nuclear war. Best case scenario sees the loss of 5000 years of human cultural and technological progress
Also if humanity manages to survive and rebuild from a nuclear war, there's a high chance they won't be able to re-industrialize since all the easily accessible natural resources like coal and oil deposits close to the surface would have already been consumed.
@@Curly_Horse all the more reason not to do it
Exactly
Nah someone always sirvives with solar panels batteries and starlink and some cheap factories. China needs to make factories around the planet that can make anything fast and cheap with tesla like tesla chkna gigs factories that can make anything
I guess we have nothing to worry about. Nobody will ever use nukes. No wins.
A lot of the data you’re using and the assumptions you’re making are quite old. The DF-31AG is a MIRV version with 3 warheads fitted and the DF-41 can carry up to 10 warheads although 3-6 is the standard, with the rest of the space taken up by penetration aids.
I’d also be very surprised if the PLARF is producing any more DF-5 missiles, the B & C models being upgrades of existing missiles to improve accuracy and offensive power, as the missiles themselves still have enough service life in them to make an upgrade worthwhile.
如果美国只有一百枚核弹，我觉得大家都可以减少，如果美国依然有这么多却指责别人是威胁，那你最好有和美国同归于尽的能力
try to count how mane times @Binkov said plausible in this video. Great job keep going mate!!!✊✊
The highest military expenditure in the world is the United States, and it is also the United States that has the most military bases in other countries, but why has no one come to point out the American threat to the world? Is the United States in a different world? It's really ridiculous
You mad bruh? 😂😂
lol what? the U.S. is a beacon of freedom and hope. the chinese steal others' technology, execute its citizens for the most mundane of crimes, and has a gdp per capita of 13,000 vs 70,000 for each american. cry
@@deveryhenderson8335 lmao beacon of freedom and hope? Who helped Pakistan against India in the 1960s? Who started the most wars? Tell that to all the people killed in America’s wars overseas. Beacon of freedom as long as it benifits Uncle Sam.
@@deveryhenderson8335 Hahahahahahahaha You must be high on something. Congratulations to your dealer.
How is the USA a "threat to the world"? The USA has loads of allies. Why? Because they know the USA *protects them*. Do you think anyone in Asia is worried about being invaded by the evil USA monsters? The USA has had the power to conquer and claim almost anyone for 50+ and didn't do it!
It all seems so pointless. Who cares who is "ahead"? What leader would even be willing to sacrifice a single city, let alone dozens or hundreds, and somehow think you have won an exchange like that? Even if you obliterate the enemy and only lose half your own country... you've lost half your country. You can't just reconquer it, it's gone forever.
china russia n. korea etc
Russia and North Korea don't care about their people
Whether you have 10 or 10,000 it ant squat unless you use them. And if you use it, it’s your death 15 minutes later. So its just a big bluff because no one would be alive to argue otherwise. 🔥🤣
Thank you for the detailed report.
Why were the Chinese captions censored in the images where the missiles were on parade? To avoid a copyright strike from the Chinese news network the images were taken from?
yes I can get you a McDuh with a side of Obviously Fries, is there anything else? perhaps an Obvious Soda?
Binkov's Chinese is not so fluent these days.
A good way to measure a country’s potential power to deliver missiles is their space program. A space rocket is an ICBM that’s used for civilian purposes. So far in history, there’s been two countries that have decades of experience launching into space, to orbit earth or to reach other planets. Those countries being the US and Russia. China has a very young space program, but I’m sure they’re learning as they go further into space.
It's naïve to call China's space program '"very young" considering they launched their first satellite 52 years ago. 13 years after Sputnik
@@stevemrayz357 ok wrong choice of words, then I would say delayed? The US and Russia have sent rovers to Mars and Venus in the 60’s and 70’s. I don’t believe China has sent a rover that far yet, although technically all 3 nations started their space program at the same time.
@@Tonymontanayayo Delayed would be a better term. The Chinese have an active Martian rover, "Zhurong". There have been no rovers sent to Venus by anyone, only landings
@@Tonymontanayayo Apparently you don't know that China just landed it's rover on Mars on it's first try A Year ago
@@sadiqahmed4143 I know very well of their recent achievements…. I meant historically, the US and Russia have a longer history of space exploration, landing rovers on Mars and Venus back in the 70’s….
The word here is *hundreds*…
*”People's Liberation Army General Zhu Chenghu, a professor at China's National Defense University, admitted that his view was not official policy. Even so, he was speaking before a group of foreign journalists. "If the Americans are determined to intervene [in China's internal affairs] we will be determined to respond." According to the Financial Times he also said, "We ... will prepare ourselves for the destruction of all the cities east of the Xian. Of course the Americans will have to be prepared that hundreds ... of cities will be destroyed by the Chinese."*
a clear give away, *my opinion*, of what China’s arsenal really is…
In addition, in the turn of millennium, a U of Singapore study suggested the Chinese should have a stockpile of 2400 units.
Similarly, a George Washington U study (2010 I think) also suggests China arsenal should be in the neighbourhood of somewhere between 2500 to 3000 warheads while…
A recent report by Russia suggests China’s arsenal should be what both the U of Singapore and the George Washington U suggested…
.
Great catch! Knowing the fact that the Chinese military s patterned after the Russian military with EVEN more corruption, such as pay for rank in the PLA etc...how operational are the nukes they have should be the main question?
@@mathetes7759 operational? Western regimes have the habit of overestimating itself and underestimating others. This is well known to the world.
Being that nuclear is a last resort/self defence weapon its no big deal. The M.A.D. doctrine stands no matter if they have 100 or 10000.
If they launch at us they go too, regardless. So it doesn't matter.
if China and Russia can shoot down incoming US nukes, and US can't shoot down incoming Chinese or Russian nukes, that's a game changer. then the MAD doctrine no longer applies.
@@joemammon6149 that's fantasy thinking if you think anyone could intercept nukes
@@JukemDrawles87 things are possible if you put your mind to it. Communist countries place heavy focus on education, unlike US that's more focused on being woke and using the right pronouns.
When I was in the US army Depleated Uranium was considered last resort. And a war crime.
Times change. Not always for the better.
China now has 947 nuclear warheads in stockpile and it has plan to build 1000 new warheads in five years from now on, so it will have around 2000 nuclear warheads in stockpile in the year of 2027.
@Jack
1200+ more precisely but "Silence is Gold" said by confucius.
The fact that we get free videos on TH-cam by Binkov's Battlegrounds is truly a gift. 👍👍👍
I have an idea for a youtube channel where a puppet speculates about complex military matters. Thoughts?
The number of warheads is misleading.
China may have 1/10 the number of warhead of USA, but has 36% of the USA if you compare the total yield of their nukes.
USA: 820 megaton total
China: 294 megaton total
China simply have fewer larger yield warhead.
yea
because a lot in those ~6000 warheads possessed by the usa (and russia) are low yield tactical warheads
china goes all in for strategic nukes, and for retaliation alone (no first strike policy)
just love to see how media exaggerate things
It is normal. The same for the US is not catching up with Russia.
Wish there was some sort of algorithm to filter out all the trolls from the comments, then at least I could see some interesting discussions there.
@Saint FluffySnow Anyone from whichever side who is screaming "other side is shit, other side shit BRUHAHA WE ARE GREATEST" etc. In this comments section they are mostly Americans, but they can vary depending on the video.
@@swaminathanbalakrishnan1399 Says you who adds nothing interesting into this comment section
Ikr!
@@thulsadoom544 And you, my friend?
There becomes a point at which more doesn't yield any benefit. Have enough to survive a few covert sub kills, and any missle defense systems. A hundred beyond that is more than enough. Any more is just for show.
Bring back country vs country analysis
Fallout is real boy,prepare building shelter everybody!
love how everyone in this comments section is now a expert in chinese relations and a professional military tactician
The world renowned China expert, and military genius septenza said China nukes doesn't work.
Only a fool would underestimate China, but globally it's a stalemate. No one can invade China. China can't invade out of the box it's in. I'm happy to keep things that way.
@@Jagonath nobody wants to invade China..... only after threatening Taiwan and other neighbors the Americans started looking into this.
There is not an Asian country that trusts the ccp.
@@iBlindPanic then why do almost all of them do a lot of trade with china?
@@joshuabonilla3491 what has trust to do with trade? Besides you dont trade with the CCP you trade with a Chinese company.
Why dont you check your facts, nothing I said you cannot find on the internet yourself: nobody likes the ccp.
Maybe if they changed the name from WARHEADs to PEACEHEADs it would help the negative image of WARHEADS.
If world war 3 started goodbye internet goodbye youtube etc.
the internet was first built to ensure communications in the event of a nuclear war
Russia and china will rebuild the internet once the demon in the west perish
@@taichitao85 Russia can't build roads and bridges, how are they going to build something technical?
@@kevinw2592 The internet might survive but it will be a mostly southern hemisphere led project. After a nuke war all out chaos would break out in the North. Governments would either collapse or become north korean in behaviour. So a heavily regulated borderline impossible internet would emerge. I know what postnuke countries would be like. Democracy dies the day the nukes fall.
As I grow older it becomes more interesting of a question to me, will WW3 happen first or will we as a species come together and actually work toward the collective continuation of our species. As of November 2022 I am sure that is a stupid question. However I still have a small sliver of faith in humanity, we might actually look outward and understand this little rock really should not be our end. Collectively we have the capacity to at the very least make this solar system a reality, we just need to stop thinking so small. We shall see...
Everyone thinks they are right and everyone else is wrong, the same is true of you.
@@milibao Macross/Robotech
I’ve read that while the Chinese have fewer warheads their average yield is much higher. With US large MIRV warheads having a yield of 300 to 475 kilotons. Where as the Chinese warhead may average 1.2 megatons. Meaning China’s warhead estimate underestimate their total nuclear yield (warheads x average yield). Putting China at around 294 MT and US at between 1300 and 1500 MT total yield (depending on number of low yield tactical nukes).
It looks like that smaller but more newclear war heads will be more efficient? as if you launch it to cities, the buildings will minimize the kill zone
That's true
Binkov mentioned in the video the Chinese miniaturization is closer to the US’s back in the 1960s. So only now are they investing the resources for more warheads and to make them smaller for more effective MIRVs.
China has 294MT, the US has 820MT
Source? Its hard to find anything on this topic given its classified.
instead of being afraid of Russia and China, look into our own streets.
A lot of lunies in western cities yes. Only in traffic and the way people drive🤦♂️
Find another youtube channel if you want to focus on that.
@@nicobruin8618 bot
Shitholes with LGBT flags, abortions as a sex protection tool and a dying infrastructure, welcome to the almighty west!!!! 😎😎😎🤣
Exactly
DF-41 is not a replacement for DF-5. DF-5 (C variant) will continue to form the core of China's silo-based ICBM in the future, as it can carry higher yield warheads in greater quantities.
Showing minute 6:25 is an Russian s505 and s550.
And 7:10 are Bulava test near by Norway to Wladivodatock.
There will be peace without the US. Look what happened to Iraq and Libya. If they only had nuclear weapons. North Korea is one example.
Well, move there, go on. Afraid of losing anything?
Well said, North Korea never disturb Asia countries. North/ South Korea is their internal affairs
@@DonVigaDeFierro Move to Iraq or Libya, go ahead.
So the DF-41 missiles which are shown in Chinese military parades are as capable of 70s US missile technology?
However, the intercontinental ballistic missiles in active service in the United States are also the technology of the 1970s and have not been updated. This is true whether it is the Trident or the Minuteman 3 missile. And Minuteman 3 can only rely on fixed silos, which is very inconvenient, similar to DF5
Well done China. 💪💪👏👏👍👍💯💯❤❤
JL-3 is already in service, it's not in testing.
"Time to put on your lead underwear!"
General Tsing Shi Tao From C & C Generals
day 3 of asking for binkov to make "what if modern day us military went back to 1941"
Yez please binkov
Fu...ed up after supplies run out. I doubt whole US at the time could supply the army.
@@piotrd.4850 their modern tech would destroy enemy target very easily
They'd win any negotiation they enter. When you have that kind of firepower, and your enemies have no defense for it, after one or two crushing engagements, most people would want to cut there losses and negotiate.
They could just ISR all important state and military staff at there headquarters and drop a few GBUs with their B-2s.
Then drop parachute tablets over enemy unis with pictures of the dead generals filmed with a modern satellite.
Won.
Theres one very likely scenario -
China can just purchase Russian reserve stockpiles as well as platforms - in return for economic aid to Russia.
- Legally as both are already nuclear powers there is much smaller obstacles geopolitically.
- It will be mutually beneficial; for China to acquire more capabilities from system such as the SARMAT and Borei class SSBN and for Russia to maintain its military industrial complex
- It is relatively available and quick. China can attain thousands of nuclear warheads and multiple new platforms within 2-5 years and Russia fast access to perserve its economy.
China could start selling staging bus equipment to North Korea. Maybe they upscale their fireworks into something that can reach the US west coast
USA has 6k plus nuclear weapons. China only in hundred. In what way the American think they are catching up?
？
Rich countries are capable of making more nukes. China is rich now and they have the technology to manufacture easily and quickly.
Lol
To complete the video, check up the declaration on the use of neutral weapon by the neutral powers.
If any given country has, say, 500 fixed targets, between major military assets and major cities then 1500 effective warheads will suffice as deterrent. You can have 5000 warheads but then you can kill your enemy only once. Focus should be in making the warheads unstoppable and having a reliable dead hand trigger. Hopefully, we will never know.
Greater numbers allow for a simple solution to enemy defense capabilities. Simply put, if China can produce several thousand, they could satirate their enemies defenses by sheer numbers.
Good video you just gotta fix that potato mic tho LMAO
One thing is certain: The next round of Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) talks need to include all nuclear powers, not just the US and Russia.
That will never happen.
Most of the information here is 15 to 20 years old....why use old data?
I certainly hope it’s not exploding!
Does it even matter beyond a few hundred warheads on 100-200 missiles? That is enough of a deterrent to assure that neither side will risk launching a nuclear attack against the other side (unless they are crazy, in which case the number of weapons doesn't matter either).
No, there's a huge difference between 2000 warhead and 200 warheads. Ukraine had 2000 warheads and West made her give them up in 1990s when USSSR was collapsing
@@borghorsa1902 But from a strategic standpoint, does it matter if you have 200 warheads or 2000 warheads, assuming you can deliver some of them to their targets?
@@Djamonja Yes it matters a lot coz Ballistic missile defence systems have improved tremendously. When you are facing a cunning warmonger like the US which uses surrounding countries as meat shields, placing BMD systems and submarine bases on their soils to box you in, you better have thousands of nukes+ ICBMs to deliver them. Even better if you convert 40% of them into hypersonic glide vehicles and Hypersonic cruise missiles. US is ganging up on China, but the gangsters around China are well aware of just how capable China is, barring the stupid Indian call centre scammers, no one else is ready to commit to total war just yet, maybe Japan is crazy enough/slave enough to atleast prepare but when push comes to shove even they will stand down especially when China reaches the magic number of nuke warheads which is 1500.
It does matter. The more nuclear warheads the harder for the USA to shoot down or take out in an pre-emptive strike.
@@Bk6346 You do realize that if two countries shoot several hundred nuclear weapons at each other, we're all screwed right? There is no winner, we all lose.
This is nothing but an estimation . What he don’t to tell you is that China has over 6000 miles of tunnels . I’m willing to bet you that China has over 1500 war head all ready .
your figure of 1500 is also nothing but an estimation.
@@CrasusC just pulling out numbers from his ass
@@CrasusC 1983 Nuclear Sub Type 092 with 12 nukes x 1 sub = 12 nukes
2004 Type 094 Sub with 12 nukes each with 4 Mirvs x 6 subs = 12x4x6= 288 nukes
2020 Type 096 sub with 18 nukes each with 12 mirvs x 8 subs = 1,728 nukes
Grand Total of Submarine Nukes is 2,208
That's 2,208 nukes just in their submarines and they are all new.
@@johnsmith1953x … assuming each silo actually has a missile and associated warhead… a big “IF”. The PLA doesn’t actually publish information about their nuclear arsenal, there is no way for you to know for sure.
The Pentagon estimates that China would amass 700 warheads by 2027. You think you know better than US DoD?
🤫🤐
Total number of functional russian nuclear devices 75.. total number that could be readied within 48 hours 114 ... total number needing remonetised .. 1000s
woooww those are very pointy rockets now that's scary sharp too
I am very happy that it will be.
What's the use of talking about nukes, 1000 and 2000 have the same effect.
Seriously
Exactly, China already has enough to sterilize the US three times over
More is better. Tougher for the USA to defend or shoot down.
@@Bk6346 If anyone fires a nuke at us they disappear too
@@JukemDrawles87 That’s why no one fires a nuke at USA. It’s call MAD mutual assured destruction. But for the same reason USA won’t attack Russia or China.
Proper China threat theory! Ha ha. It is suggested that the host broadcast a video of the United States' nuclear weapons
How many nuclear missiles are required to destroy US ?
It depends on the definition of "destroy"
If you mean the governemmt/high military organization
Then just a few houndreds are enough...
But if you mean destroy ANY type of politic, military or civilian power, so the country cant reorganize in the next 1000 years...
Then it would take thousands of bombs
@@KevinAssalin
I hope China and Russia destroy US for good !
@@joekerr0108 China & Russia will be dust even they even tried so keep dreaming clown
@@bogotnukes379 Really kid ?
China and Russia will make US disappear !
Learn something kid instead of moving your stupid mouth !
That's what kids are good for !
@@joekerr0108 the U.S literally has thousands of more nukes then China but sure kid 😂
It is only a matter of time. The genie has been let out of the bottle.
Albert Einstein.
regardless if China Surpasses the USA in military production they have basically 3 allies in the world. It would be perhaps NOKO, China and what's left of Russia. Expect Russia to switch sides like they did in WW2.
Russia would be their ally
@@jc.1191 yes I added What's left of Russia as an Ally and then they switch like in WW2
It doesn't matter in a world war scenario how many "allies" you have. Between China and Russia they will have 6000+ nuclear "allies".
You seem to forget US government leaders spent DECADES antagonizing their Russian counterparts, including delivering outright threats- how else is Putin to interpret Biden's demand he be removed from power?
If the US goes to war against China, Russia will AT LEAST offer to sell China munitions at a discount, and "volunteers" to fight against a mutual enemy (which is the US), out of spite.
The us just said it was 400
Edit: with likely 1000 by 2030
And 1500 by 2035...
So china is adding some 80 nukes per year
The U.S. releases various ridiculous reports on the number of China’s nuclear warheads every year to infer the number of China’s nuclear warheads based on China’s response. They deliberately underestimate the number of China’s nuclear warheads every time to test China’s response. The latest report points out that China has 400 nuclear warheads. Good joke, just use basic IQ to calculate that China has at least thousands of nuclear warheads
We will not allow ourselves to have only a few hundred nuclear warheads, especially against NATO
@@Abhi-ly7nr You just have to remember the report is hilarious, I'm sure by this time next year the US will say that China has 800 nuclear warheads, do you know why they do it? Because they know that China has at least thousands of nuclear warheads, just to ask Congress for money, they will hype it step by step
@@Abhi-ly7nr If you want to mobilize production in an all-round way, it can be done, but in fact, these do not need to be concerned by civilians, because the country has many specialized mathematics talents who can calculate roughly how many nuclear warheads need to be produced through reasonable calculations.
@@Abhi-ly7nr China has a 5,000-kilometer underground nuclear Great Wall. In fact, there are still many unannounced weapons, so what really protects the country is not the weapons you think
How the Serb army escaped Nato
'They came out to villages when they wanted to, they hid when the weather was good'
Nato commanders, not to say political leaders, became increasingly frustrated by their inability to destroy Serb units.
It was known that Yugoslavia had built an extensive system of underground shelters for its troops, guns and aircraft - a relic of President Tito's era, in preparation for a possible invasion by the Soviet Union. Many of its camouflage techniques, including the use of dummy weapons emplacements, the Serbs had learned from the russians.
Critics of the bombing campaign also said mistakes were the inevitable result of Nato's policy of restricting its pilots to bombing from 15,000 feet or above - a policy dictated not least by political considerations, notably Washington's determination to avoid horrified public reaction to the sight of "bodybagsss coming home.
Yet when the western media saw the Serb military withdraw from Kosovo in early June, they saw convoys of Serb tanks, armoured cars, guns, trucks and military equipment untouched by Nato's air assault.
Nato's bombing campaign, with thousand of sorties and the dropping of tens of thousands of bombs, including sophisticated precision weapons, succeeded in damaging just 13 of the Serbs' 300 battle tanks in Kosovo.
The Serbs had 50 marines In their care and that's the reason why it stopped and think USA hid behind NATO for small serbia
And still never won..
Have a great day or night depending where you are...
The Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union plunged the world into serious confrontation and serious nuclear risk for half a century, which was a disaster for other countries. The limited self-defense capability of nuclear weapons is enough to prevent the outbreak of nuclear war. The earth is not only a few nuclear powers such as the United States, Russia, China, Britain and France, but also more than 100 other non-nuclear countries. These countries do not want to be involved in a great power confrontation or nuclear war, so nuclear weapons are for self-defense, not aggression. Nor can it be used as a weapon to coerce other nations, merely as a means to avoid the outbreak of a large-scale war between great powers. There is only one earth. It is a home for human life, learning and common progress, rather than a battlefield for conflicts between major countries.
I agree with you. Now tell that to the US regime.
I thought it was a no go to stop making nukes ?
Funny how you're using Russian missile launches to talk about China.
When the US have more than 5000
What a joke 5000 is not a threat
Ofcourse it isnt a threat to themself, but when other country have it, it is
They fear everything not under their control
How's it catching up? Us has like 4-6 thousand warheads. China has like 300. 😑
That mentality its one of the worst, yeah today they have 300 but what about 10 years in the future? 2500? 3000? even maybe 3500? ICBM's, never underestimate a crazy paranoid dictator
@@atatatatatagsad why anyone needs 2500? with just 1000 you already don't need any deliver system, just detonate the nukes where you store them, and the entire earth is gone...................
well yea china could produce more
on another note, the recorded ~6000 warheads of the usa and russia included a lot of low yield tactical nukes, so the actual number of strategic nukes are actually lower, probably several thousands less
@1 CQC Native American
@@atatatatatagsad You're acting like the US numbers is frozen?? Tf
The amount is irrelevant. Once you get to a certain point it doesn't matter if you can destroy the world over 5 or 10 times.
People repeat the same silly claim as if it's an indisputable fact. There are nowhere near enough nuclear weapons to kill every single person on Earth. Most missiles are pointed at military targets, and a typical city would require a dozen or so warheads to completely level it. The biggest killer would be starvation following the collapse of supply chains and agriculture after a large nuclear exchange, but if you prepare ahead of time and buy non perishables you can definitely survive this. Also, nuclear winter is a fantasy. Volcanic eruptions and wildfires kick up way more dust into the atmosphere than airburst nuclear detonations, and all but the largest eruptions cause any significant degree of global cooling. Most of the world would survive an all out nuclear war.
Exactly
You need more for redundancy. The USA might be able to shoot down incoming ICBM or sink Chinese nuclear submarines. Having 12 nuclear submarines will make harder for the USA to stop a nuclear attack.
The future of humanity is bleak and filled with death and destruction due to the excess of power, materialism, and territorial expansion.
human ego
Is Binkov aware that submarines could likely launch missiles even when in dock?
That would make it a easy target because wars dont start with nukes
China has already nearly 1000 active nuclear warheads, close to US and Russia.
*Marine eating crayon noises*
China hypersonic ICBM carrying multi-nuclear war heads has inches weaponry edge
In terms of Nukes it’s Russia 1, China 2 and USA 3. Russia has beat delivery systems and by far most nuclear weapons in serviceZ. Russia pulled out of STARTII. Russia has over 2000 strategic missile delivery systems and 6000-1000 tactical nukes. China has 500-1000 strategic weapons likely and better ICBMs. USA basically has Trident and shitty minute man 3 with over 1000 weapons.
@@TheGrindcorpsIs that what your propaganda tells you?? That's wild how uninformed people are.
@@itsreapernecrosis2215 no, it’s what the CIA and state dept will tell you outside the party about Minuteman III being obsolete.
@TheGrindcorps That's a negative. If you read through the entire documented report, you would see they concluded that the US has garnered its nuclear weaponry advancement to be faster as well as more inexpensive to their Russian counterparts, as well as more affluence to upgrade current fielded nuclear assets of which the US has more and a current in house modernization process struck for 2029.
As for China, they can't even state their gdp properly as stated by their own late Premier who said that china's gdp was false, and he had to dig into electricity usage and agricultural consumption to try and find what chinas actual gdp. Their want on claims of nuclear power are precarious at best. With 8 or 9 high officials being "let go" for corruption and replacing said missiles feul with water or other liquids. There's a reason their own society called them "tofu dregs". Because everything you see is might as well be made of it.
@@itsreapernecrosis2215 lol. Russia has all those capabilities in their nukes but the delivery systems are much better, as I said. They also have 6,000 deployable tactical nukes which really tilts things in their favor. They can be deployed on all kinds of missiles beyond what used to be limited under START.
I am very curious about what the Western media is based on to determine the number of Chinese nuclear warheads
who cares, the more they make the more that they has to dispose of in the future, total waste of resource.
@@Abhi-ly7nr they definitely have enough slave labor for it
An American or Japanese factory in China is a Chinese factory because the government can seize it at any time.
@@Bk6346 like what us.a seize Afghanistan 7B usd. 🤔🤔
Tons of Chinese bots in these comments
I tell you why...I am from South East Asia...I see so much propaganda bullshits..by western..main stream media....I decided to defend the truth...not China....
@@ganboonmeng5370 defend Wuhan bat virus and Chinese bat soup vaccine and lockdown
@@ganboonmeng5370 yes sir, you make Chairman Xi very proud.
Not as many as the brainwashed neocons
"Chinese bots" is such a dumb trope. At least "Wumao" made more sense conceptually even if it was overused. The Chinese government wouldn't make bots to post on youtube. It probably wouldn't even pay people to do it. They have a billion people who buy their ideology and will do it for free.
China is not Iraq or Afganistan ? They have a big power. US must get full NATO support . We have learn that how to live together in peace.
Tell that to the ccp.
🔥🔥🔥
Why are people mocking each other in the comments in defense/attack of X country?
Dude, they don't care, and certainly won't even bat an eye when you turn into ashes from a nuclear explosion, let's discuss the military aspects
Don't Want to Set the World on Fire - The Ink Spots
in our chinese mind，nuclear weapons are protection tools，not a attack tool！Protect our asian/african brothers！Its truth！
No one thinks China is building nukes to attack. But the risk is, the more they have, the more likely it is China will use them. It's the exact same problem with US military power. The USA doesn't "plan" to attack anyone. But the more power they have, the more often they suddenly decide "Now we can invade country XYZ... and win!" It will be exactly the same with China.
"Protect our asian/african brothers！Its truth！" nope it propaganda and you fell for it.
Chinese are pathological liars, pathetic liars too. Only idiots believe them and it is probably why they still think it is working lol
In short, China's nuclear arsenal does not need to catch up with that of the United States. The reason is very simple. The effect of destroying one time is the same as destroying it a hundred times.
There is no guarantie for the first attempt
The reason for more is redundancy. The USA might be able to shoot down incoming Chinese nuclear missiles or sink a Chinese nuclear submarine. Having more nuclear bombs will make it harder for the USA to stop or defend against a nuclear attack from China.
The US currently has over ten times the number of nukes as China but with one fifth the population and a GDP about the same. With China's economy still growing at up to 10% per annum that means that it should double in size by 2030 so I would be very surprised if their nuclear arsenal DIDN'T at least double in the same period. In all respects then - total population, total economy size and GDP per head I can't see why China shouldn't increase their arsenal by 5-6 times in the next 10 years.
The US is just scared because for the first time since the 1980s another nation may be able to match it in strength and power.
But their GDP didn't grow up by 10% since 2012. This year it's only 3-4% and current (Western) estimates suggest it'll stay this way in the near future.
This doesn't mean their nuclear arsenal won't grow, but it's not going to be as cheap and easy for them as you suggest.
Hahahahaha cheap Chinese nukes? Oh God don't wanna be the poor bastard who has to be launching those.
Why is our timeline looking more and more like the Fallout timeline?
American writers can't produce anything original. Just squeals and cheap knockoffs
China wished to ban nukes, but the US refused it outright. So China is left with no choice, China must increase its nuke arsenal to survive.
Why? Why are we assuming that nukes are how you defend against nukes? Why are we assuming that survival requires nukes?
Russia has nukes. Look at how much good it does them. NATO doesn’t even need nukes to threaten retaliation.
Wumao detected
Because without nukes a state with nukes can blackmail those without it. Stupid.
@@hotdogstockimage I’m from the EU, I’m just being fair and objective.
Go China go. Russia is with you. Balance of the World Power is on your side. God bless China and Russia. Cheers
YIKES 😳
"We may lose 300 million people. So what?" - Mao Zedong regarding nuclear war.
I saw that famous twit of his
Chnooks be like dat
Iraq Ilbya given up Nuclear bomb programs resulting US NATO bomb both countries to stone age. NK seen the evil of US NATO EU hegemonic atrocities to Iraq and Libya that's why he will never give up his Nuclear bomb very smart.🙏🙏
US and Russia should both voluntarily lower their stockpile to under 500 each. Then a world wide nuclear weapons reduction process can start. But as long as these two countries maintain overwhelming stockpiles themselves, no one is going to be sincere about reducing nuclear weapons.
The number is irrelevant it's about the quality/power of the warhead if they would agree on reducing the one with a processing advantage would simply replace older models with way more powerful new ones, beside that the whole reason they didn't go to war was mutual nuclear destruction.
Russia isn't going to agree to that now. They've seen their conventional weakness.
@@jc.1191 Regarding the current conflict i think with the low amount of troops in the field till recently, they did quiet a "good" job, ukraine got assistance worth the russian military budget times 4 by now, the russian airstrikes against military targets where successful but now the ukrainian army gets trained in other countries etc. - Regarding russia not agreeing, they are fully aware that the usage of nukes against a NATO member would mean the end and i hope NATO is also aware of that so they dont get more stupid ideas.
@@michaelfinger6303 Yeah, nobody nuke anyone. We won't survive anywhere if that happens.
Be it real or just paper tiger....do you want China to test it for you to see if real ? Dont regret later
I love how Chinese keep talks rather than some real battle.
@@bytpokornykareem8897 Lol so are you wishing for real war to happen? You want to experience suffering? You want your loved ones to experience suffering? You want humanity to end as we know it? Because if you do, maybe its just you... Why don't you go to war with China yourself, while we peacefully watch you eat Chinese rubber bullets? That (your foolishness and stupidity) will kill our boredom for a little while 🥱
@@bytpokornykareem8897 real battle? since when after ww2 US had real battle、 invading small country is not battle
really? so paper tiger US can invade china now, see if it dares
Report by "some guy" .. don't Americans learn of their past mistakes?
Not in the last century,
Don't worry, China just making toys.
"It is likely China had help." From the good old USA. Wikipedia's entry on Qian Xuesen for example: "During the Second Red Scare, in the 1950s, the US federal government accused him of communist sympathies. In 1950, despite protests by his colleagues, he was stripped of his security clearance ... he was released in 1955 in exchange for the repatriation of American pilots who had been captured during the Korean War ... Upon his return, he helped lead the Chinese nuclear weapons program. This effort ultimately led to China's first successful atomic bomb test and hydrogen bomb test, making China the fifth nuclear weapons state, and achieving the fastest fission-to-fusion development in history. Additionally, Qian's work led to the development of the Dongfeng ballistic missile and the Chinese space program. For his contributions, he became known as the "Father of Chinese Rocketry", nicknamed the "King of Rocketry"."
The original rocketman. Donald Trump gave Kim Jong Un the wrong nickname
Or the Chinese American guy that stole plans for the W-88 warhead for China.
it can be every ten years if computer chips were not sanctioned
Whatever as long as its economy continues to grow it is just ok by whatever name
The world peace need balance Checks
Good Chinese policy for one world more
Safe and Peaceful 🤙
Considered to be one of the greatest failures of the U.S. Navy, the Formosa Expedition (or the Paiwan War) of 1867 witnessed the retreat of U.S. forces
1812 lost to the brits and signed a declaration in 1814
The Battle of Powder River was fought on March 17th, 1876 in what is now the U.S. state of Montana. The event witnessed an embarrassing defeat.
The United States lost another war to Native American forces in the Red Cloud’s War. Waged between 1866 and 1868,
Considered to be one of the greatest failures of the U.S. Navy, the Formosa Expedition (or the Paiwan War) of 1867 witnessed the retreat of U.S. forces
the Second Battle of Vailele on April 1st, 1899, during the Second Samoan War (1898-1899), the combined British, American, and Samoan forces loyal to Samoan Prince Tanu, were defeated by the Samoan rebels loyal to Mata'afa Iosefo, a Paramount Chief of Samoa, at Vailele in Samoa.
The United States, as a participant in the Allied intervention during the Russian Civil War of 1918, was forced to withdraw its troops after being unable to achieve the target of empowering the anti-Bolshevik "White" forces to fight against "Red" Bolshevism in Russia. In the aftermath of the First World War, the Allied forces launched a multi-national expedition with the initial target to aid the Czechoslovak Legion to secure its trade position in the Russian ports, as well as to strengthen their Eastern Front. However, the Allied forces had to retreat when factors like a lack of
domestic support, dilution of initial goals, and war-weariness started to turn the mission of Allied intervention into an unsuccessful one. Ultimately, the Reds defeated the Whites.
The Korean War (1950-1953) can be considered as a major defeat for the United States, the loss of soldiers and planes, russia and china got involved the end was for the United states.
The United States suffered a major defeat in the not-so-distant past during the Bay of Pigs Invasion in Cuba. On April 17th, 1961, Brigade 2506, a U.S. CIA-sponsored paramilitary group, attempted to invade Cuba and overthrow the Cuban communist government headed by Fidel Castro, the famous Cuban politician and revolutionary. However, the Cuban Revolutionary Armed Forces, headed by Castro himself, severely defeated the United States'
The Vietnam War (1955-1975) is a black-marked event in the histories of both Vietnam and the United States, and one when the latter country, after losing thousands of soldiers in the war, was effectively badly defeated and forced to retreat.
in serbia was not a win with NATO and stealths were not invisible a 80 year old with a old cannon popped it down with many others and did 0 damage to any serbian military weapons.
Also lost to Canada
Lost with NATO to syria
Lost with NATO to Afghanistan
Left all their weapons, aircrafts everything
Lost trillions
Lost billions
Left their civilians behind
Before they ran out
25 marines went to sleep
Permanently at Kabul airport and scores beyond repair.
Oh cant forget about clusters last stand
USA and british chased out from the India- Pakistan waters in
The 70a
USA
Run
Away
From.
Fast
And hide behind NATO.
But USA did win against Grenada and took 3 weeks to win against 1000 guys and USA wins in Hollywood movies
Have a great day or night depending where you are..
Right bro
POV: Proceed to completely ignore other stuff the US did, but hey, you manage to say the US loss every single battle so yeah right
@@oworandom
No they did win in Grenada and in Hollywood movies.
Done ..
Have a great day
Chinese dictator Xi Jingping said on state media: "China has never invaded or bullied others"...HAHAHA!!
China lost to Vietnam in 1979.
They invaded Vietnam in full support of the genocidal Khmer rouge regime as the Vietnamese army was fighting them in Cambodia. The reserve bodies (not the Vietnamese army) stopped the PLA and drove them back with enormous material and personnel losses. China has invested heavily in hiding that humilliating defeat from its own people.
Can you imagine going to school in America and not knowing about the Vietnam war? Well, that's exactly what going to school in China is like. This war is NOT in the state news. It's never mentioned by the media, and it's not even in their history books.
In fact, China actually had 2 wars with Vietnam in the 70s. They seized the crescent group of the Paracel islands, after which they invaded the Vietnamese mainland.
Let's review history, but only the recent history, so only from 1949 onwards:
- In 1949, China annexed East Turkistan, now called Xinjiang, under the excuse that it has been a part of China "since ancient times", with the only proof being a pair of fleeting mentions in very old texts.
- In 1950, China invaded Tibet. The Chinese government doesn't recognize it as an invasion but the Tibetan surely do, and still call for their freedom to this day.
- In 1962, China invaded India and seized the border region of Aksai Chin, an area the size of Switzerland. They also attempted to seize Arunachal Pradesh, but ultimately failed.
- In 1969, the Chinese launched an attack on the Soviet army due to a disagreement over the Zhenbao island, located in a river between China and the USSR.
- In 1979, China invades Vietnam and loses.
- In 1996, after a Taiwanese election, china deploys and fires missiles in the province of Fujian, in order to intimidate Taiwan into adhering to the "One china policy"
- 5 of may of 2020, Chinese forces invaded India by entering the Galwan valley, making the first time shots were fired between both superpowers.
- In 2022, China launches missiles over Taiwan, conducts live fire exercises around the island, and violates Taiwanese airspace several times, in an obvious attempt to intimidate them after a US official state visit. Several more officials have visited the island since, but the Chinese have not conducted further exercises.
And they will still deny their history of lies and aggression to this very day...
@@DonVigaDeFierro
No they didnt
Bye
Americano .
We are living in Command & Conquer worlds.
The amount of bots from this specific “nation” is appalling.
TH-cam truly needs to fix this.
"TH-cam, please ban those who disagree with me". There, I fixed it for you.
@@Evan-iq8hdthank you for fixing it, then Evan 😁
Ahhh you mean India
@@Evan-iq8hd It is a known fact that China has armies of paid shills and bots. And it's quite obvious they're in these comments.
@@M_Jono they have a huge number on twitter too
The Puppet is cute for something as serious as nuclear weapons. Thanks for sharing your thoughts. What the Chinese needed are about 40,000 ICBM, but just 300 nukes. They just need a
Not to forget that china has not invaded or interfere militarily for a long time unlike those who accuse the chinese of being barbaric or being on a war path.
@@erikzhukovsky9742 "for a long time" that doesn't mean anything. Things change...
Putin talks utter nonsense the self acclaimed master strategist couldn't plan a trip to the supermarket
@@erikzhukovsky9742 Yeah that's because they didn't possess the military power to do that now they steal everything around them ...try to stay up to date Einstein
No idea wht you are saying. AI not working properly.
why not? It's good for China.
Yes so China can learn how to use nuclear blackmail like Russia
@@mastermariner490 As a Southeast Asian, I think the nuclear blackmail of the US against third world countries is much more than that of China. But white people still regard USA as pure as God. 😅
@@huas5350 Please tell us how many times US have threatened to use nuclear weapons against third world countries, in comparison to Russias weekly threats.
Go ahead little mao
@@mastermariner490 tell us which country actually used nuclear weapon?? here''s U$1
@@fatdoi003 Nobody yet,only US used the atom bomb in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Todays nuclear weapons are 100 times more powerful
Anything else little wumao whataboutism
Автор рассказывает про Китай, но пуска ракет показывает российские.