Thanks Camera Canada for the loaners! If you buy any of these through my affiliate links, canon will update the firmware and allow you 3 more minutes of jail time visits with your camera. Canadian links in the description, youtube won't let me post them in the comments. Just as a note, I had firmware 1.1 on the R6 and 1.05 on the lens, which I THOUGHT was the latest, but it's not lol. So that's probably why the IBIS was so bad, I have a video coming with the R5 also not on the latest lens firmware, but now it's up to date and all future vids will have it. We'll test the IBIS again with the new firmware. Canon R6 amzn.to/3gVRJbW Canon RF 15-35mm f2.8 amzn.to/3btdui6
This is why i love this channel. He cares about 1080p for our vlogging needs. He also cares about other modes. Every channel that gets the hand on these cameras all just care about 4K. Your the best reviewer man. Thanks Camera Canada for helping him for these reviews as well.
So true . Every other reviewer not only didn’t do 1080 but none of the.m Did 4K 24 p either. . They all only did 4k30 and up with the highest bit rates and MBs with he intention of over heating it . This was the first ever day normal how ppl use the camera review
@@tobinfrost2517 Well what do we expect when youtubers out there just copying each other's style of review. Gerald Undone and Camera conspiracies is where i go for more comprehensive tests.
Navi Reljan I totally agree with you. But you can’t put both of these channels together in the same room... that’s a divorce court waiting to happen...
All jokes aside, a good thing about your reviews is the neighborhood “walks & talks”. While a lot of reviewers do synthetic bench marks, and/or “...time to process my file...” bench marks, watching your “Walk & Talk” on a camera is a great real world review. Beauty ‘ eh!
Outside vistas and Kasey's crazy commentary are what still bringing me back to this channel. Sadly, the original idea of finding solutions for vlogging, seems to be lost. Nowadays he walks around with these cameras that cost thousands of dollars. I don't find that relatable anymore.
I am not a vlogger but I enjoy watching your videos when you are testing these different cameras and products. I am one of those " dreaded stills photographers" and watch your videos for the humor and insight on cameras. Bye the way I got 2 of your Camera Conspiracies shirts and they came very quickly from the time I ordered to when I received them. Looking forward to your next walk in the neighborhood.
Oh how I’ve waited for this Canon video series. I’m so excited. I’m sold on the Sony already but I’ve been holding out, patiently waiting, to see your review of these two. The fact that you have both the R5 and the R6 is a dream / nightmare come true.
It's not as good as the A7SIII but I'd stop short of saying that it's "definitely behind the competition". If they put CLog3 in there, as they're rumored to be working on, the difference will be even more negligible.
It feels like most of the RF-glass love is from photographers, and maybe from youtubers that stick to exclusive studio use. I really appreciate how you describe the settings you use as you try out different modes.
It’s official I am now a fan of Camera Canada. Thank you guys for supporting This channel. I’ll be sure to purchase my next camera or lens through you guys.
You deserved such respect from Canon man. You reviewing most controversial questions which about no one speaks about, thank for you work, keep it great! Make most impartial review on this two babies as you can!!!
I was turned off from the R6 but this has me interested again. I do think you need to start using ND filters and shutter angles in your videos.... the high shutter speeds make it look so choppy.
This is exactly what I was thinking which makes it a bit unfair. Would probably look better with the correct(ish) shutter angle, not 1/4000 Edit: not unfair against other cameras but to itself. I would like if he used an VND to get as close as possible to correct shutter for most natural motion blur)
You picked up that A7SIII and you immediately got a perfect image in FIRST video, and it feels like with R6 you aren't getting that instant magic (but, you always get way better with new cam by like third video).
I never understood why people like canon colors so much, especially those standard profiles have too much contrast and saturation, I would always use log and grade myself If I was using canon cameras.
Late to the party but thought I´d share my experience with the R6 after about a year. 1080p 120 fps sucks, unfortunately. There seems to be a lack of sharpness and detail, looks almost like 720p to me. The 4K however... oh wow. The 4K60 (I use it for slowing down nature photography) is so good it makes me drool :) I´ve never even been close to over heating but then again I rarely film more than 1 minute or 2 at a time. Low light performance is great, I´ve filmed night shots at ISO 51200 and it works for my purposes (Aurora and Milky Way night time videos). I would really like 4K120 (or a useable 1080p 120) but I can´t afford an R5 and the 4K60 on the R6 looks even better than the R5.
The skin looks really muted and bad on this camera at points. The light parts of your skin looked blue and that is not good (in the outdoor test). Daylight is warm colours in this season.
It was hilarious how you were anticipating the camera to overheat lol! Also, no appearance by the Canon Cripple Hammer; the R6 must be doing something(s) right. Dynamic range wasn't bad to be fair but the highlights in the sky were blown out in 4k (if I remember correctly). Honest and hilarious content as always! 👏🏾
Everyone’s talking about the IBIS wobbles but I don’t think it looks that bad..? 😅 especially when you zoom in a little it looks great. And the 1080 looked fine to me! But I personally don’t make videos, I just watch them and this was pleasing to watch imo.
Yeah I didn't notice the "wobbles" at all until he mentioned it and I had to look really closely to see them at all. It's still better than the Sony IBIS overall and has no crop or stutter jumps like the Sony.
No, its pretty good. It more than passable. The whole idea of blogging is that its not professional, it's not meant to be. Slight wobble or jumpiness is fine.
@@cameraconspiracies I think I've read that the IBIS edge wobble gets better once you use the lens at 17mm or 18mm, not at its widest. Also, please just show us Canon colours out of the camera, not with the Fuji LUT over it.
"Where's the primes at the wide end?" YES. That's a huge part of the advantage of mirrorless over SLRs too, you can make the wide lenses smaller and lighter but all Canon did was a 35mm f/1.8, that barely even counts as wide. I'm not sure what's holding them back, but it's the most frustrating thing about their whole mirrorless system. You can get EF primes, but they're bigger and heavier than the equivalent primes for Sony E mount.
Definitely frustrating, but as many people have said it is a new system and it looks like they are trying to get their bad ass stuff out first. I am certain they will follow up with some of their usual staples, eventually...
@@zaiENT1 By this point in the EF mount's existence there was already a 28mm f/2.8, a 24mm f/2.8 and a 15mm f/2.8 fisheye. They were gunning for the pro photographer market back then too.
I'm so glad for Camera Canada getting all these cameras to you. Best real world reviewer. I waited for you to get these cameras as I was curious to see how the IBIS actually performs... turns out its not as great as all other youtubers claim it to be.
To be fair, we never saw the Sony at anything wider than 20mm. The wobbles get bad at superwide angles. Also the enhanced stab on the R6 looked very smooth, albeit with a significant crop
yeah, it's weird, the image was pretty shaky here. In ever other test I've seen, the R5/R6 IBIS beats the A7SIII IBIS by a fair margin until you turn on the cropped IBIS on the Sony and then that would suffer from weird stutter jumps. Here it almost looked like he had IBIS turned off.
Have you seen the info going around about Sony's gyro stabilization? It looks really impressive, only major downside is needing to shoot at high shutter speeds but that's never bothered you anyway. Available on ZV-1 and A7sIII
I think he mentioned something about this either last video or the one before. Too much of a waste of time stabilizing one video to be worth it. At least for vlogging purposes.
It's amazing how good they are anyway. One thing we can be sure about with Casey, whether sent a camera for free or not, he will be blatantly honest about it, whether good or bad.
I bought an EF to EOS R adapter with control ring from Camera Canada because supplies in the U.S. were completely wiped out after the release of the R5 and R6. Didn't even take very long for the item to arrive. I still can't buy one here. Saved by Camera Canada!
The thing that no one talks about is how much internal sharpening canon and Nikon have. If you sharpened the hell out of the Fuji in post it may look more similar.
Now since EOS R6 has got the clog3 update, this could have been the perfect camera if there was no overheating and had all-i .. Canon still somewhat crippled it by not providing all-i
In a review of 1.0 firmware it was said it would come in 1.1, but I guess maybe not. Canon didn't even give early reviews the 1.1, maybe going straight to 1.2
Thats one of the major drawbacks about the R6. No real-deal shutter or aperture priority modes for video. The 80D is the same way. You have to go to a "5" level camera or the EOS R to get true shutter and/or apreture priority modes in video. Thats why it was so annoying that the R5 has overheating issues. But hopefully through firmware the R5 & R6 will get the added functionality they need.
But to clarify. Its not a huge problem. Its just a drawback. For locked off shots in studio or if your in a run and gun situation and you stop moving and have consistent light you can set your parameters via manual mode (which can in fact be bounced to C1-C3 position) and it will work just fine. But it is nice when you are moving to allow the camera to do most the work while you know your maintaining your desired parameter and the camera is adjusting the other two parts of the exposure triangle automatically.
It is worth pointing out that every single camera release has seen improvements to the DFD. When they first released it it didn't even work at all. Now It's almost as good as a bad phase detect system. And contrast detection does have a lot of advantages. It works in much lower lighting conditions, is more accurate, and in single point autofocus it's actually faster than phase detection. If they can work out the kinks in it there is the potential for it to vastly surpass phase detection autofocus. They just aren't there yet. If they do ever reach that point though they will have an exclusive autofocus system built on years of development, test designs, etc that functions unlike any other on the market and would take competition years to catch up to. In my opinion this is the direction that the Panasonic engineers are thinking to go. They obviously see an endgame in developing the DFD system or else they wouldn't have stuck to it for years. It's just a question of whether or not it ever delivers, but from their development rate it is obvious that the system is being improved with every subsequent camera.
I am returning mine. We shoot a lot of our lower end videos in 1080 60 for real estate and the "moire" is absolutely terrible around windows, blinds, and edges of furniture. The r5 does not have this problem or ALL of the cameras we have had previously. Disappointed.
When you use CLog2 outside, even if the shutter is maxed out, you are still overexposed because the lens is too fast and the base ISO of Clog is too high (i believe it's 800), you need to use an ND filter or stop down the aperture.
Use the 4k crop mode 5k oversample to 4k on the R5 and use a Cheap 18-55mm IS Kit Lens and you have your perfect camera. no overheat, the best stabilization, great colors and High quality video.
That sounds like way too much of a compromise for a nearly $4000 camera. Especially when you don't have to make compromises like that with the a7sIII. Which is $300 less than the r5
Camera Conspiracies you are always comparing the Xt4 with any camera and the APSC beat everyone and you keep thinking that the sensor size matters? Is 5k oversample to 4k sensor size not matters for that situation. Of course the camera have other functions that work in full frame for other situations but full frame for vlogging is not a good choice, that doesnt mean that you use that camera in crop mode for everything but for vloging make sense. Have oversample 5k without overheat, IBIS, lens stab, and a wide shot is not that the perfect camera that you are looking for?
1/1000th of a shutter, wideangle ibis jerk, 30 fps on a 24 fps timeline, pretty meh rolling shutter(it uses the 1dx mark 3 sensor which for some reason can do full sensor 60 fps(16.6ms of rolling shutter) but if you set it to 30 fps/24 fps it has 33.3ms of rolling shutter, which is pretty bad)
There is the high quality mode. It has the option to enable or disable. By default it is disabled. You a find the setting in the same area where you select the video resolution. Its right below where you turn on high frame rate.
@@cameraconspiracies Yeah, I realize that now... Thought you were out with he R5. Must be nice to have both side by side. You'll get so much material out of them.
Nice butterfly. Anyway, if you want a wide-angle prime lens for FF mirrorless you could look at the Nikon 20mm F1.8, Sony do a 20mm F1.8 & Panasonic have the Sigma 20mm F1.4. I am not aware of any native wide-angle lenses for RF mount yet, the only one I could see was the Samyang 14mm F2.8. Canon needs to make one quick, just for you!
The R6 is cool in a lot of ways but it definitely feels like it got less development love from Canon than the R5. Not even crazy cutting edge stuff, just normal usability stuff. Here's what I've noticed: - Indeed there's no way to save video settings to C1,2,3 that I know of. The R5 can do this from what I've seen. - The joystick doesn't do anything half the time. It works like you'd expect in the menus, but then when you go to image review, left and right do nothing-- on every other camera that flips to the previous and next picture, respectively. You _have_ to use the rotary wheel on the back, which, by the way, is no longer a D-pad/wheel combo. It's just a wheel. Also lets you navigate around the Q menu but pressing in on the joystick doesn't select anything, you have to press the "set" or shutter button. -No shutter or aperture priority modes in video; it's either full auto or full manual. WHY? -Setting custom white balance is still a pain in the ass (this is the case on the R5 too to be fair though) -The R6 has what I'd describe as a 7-10% crop when shooting in 4K. The R5 does not crop unless you tell it to. The R5 also has a lot more codec, resolution, and framerate options (although strangely no 1080p in any mode above 60fps).
Canon seemed over exposed often. But I do like the image quality. especially that butterfly shot looked really nice. I am an all manual type of guy using blackmagic cameras so I think if you tried that and exposed properly you'd be in business with this canon. pretty sure you like to just film and upload without colour correcting stuff though, so I get it.
So, the hdr mode... it studders. The enhanced stab.... was actually fantastic! And I'm usually NOT impressed by anyone's stabilization on a mirrorless cam yet. ( the regular stab...junk).
I expect Sony to position the A7C and its rumored smaller, lighter lenses, as a key competitive differentiator against the heavier Canon lenses. Weight does matter when you need to carry the equipment for a while.
I think that canon will eventually get you the vlog lens in the small focal length prime, but they’re pretty focused on drawing the professional photographers with the immaculate, bank breaking lenses for the moment.
That’s the hesitation I have with R5 and R6 is if you are ok in 1080 or 4K non HQ, why buy it there are so many good 1080 cameras and 4K non HQ cameras is the price these are going for it worth the upgrade? 🤔 I dunno I have a tough time with that.
Thanks Camera Canada for the loaners! If you buy any of these through my affiliate links, canon will update the firmware and allow you 3 more minutes of jail time visits with your camera. Canadian links in the description, youtube won't let me post them in the comments. Just as a note, I had firmware 1.1 on the R6 and 1.05 on the lens, which I THOUGHT was the latest, but it's not lol. So that's probably why the IBIS was so bad, I have a video coming with the R5 also not on the latest lens firmware, but now it's up to date and all future vids will have it. We'll test the IBIS again with the new firmware.
Canon R6 amzn.to/3gVRJbW
Canon RF 15-35mm f2.8 amzn.to/3btdui6
Set up a custom mode. Cake walk.
Can’t wait
video has 3 custom modes you can save to!
User error and we learned nothing! As usual! Keep up the great work
Jaeger Schtulmann they were clipping most likely because of user error. He has no nd filter on. And he’s honestly not the best color grader lol
This is why i love this channel. He cares about 1080p for our vlogging needs. He also cares about other modes. Every channel that gets the hand on these cameras all just care about 4K. Your the best reviewer man. Thanks Camera Canada for helping him for these reviews as well.
So true . Every other reviewer not only didn’t do 1080 but none of the.m Did 4K 24 p either. . They all only did 4k30 and up with the highest bit rates and MBs with he intention of over heating it . This was the first ever day normal how ppl use the camera review
@@tobinfrost2517 Well what do we expect when youtubers out there just copying each other's style of review. Gerald Undone and Camera conspiracies is where i go for more comprehensive tests.
Navi Reljan I totally agree with you. But you can’t put both of these channels together in the same room... that’s a divorce court waiting to happen...
All jokes aside, a good thing about your reviews is the neighborhood “walks & talks”. While a lot of reviewers do synthetic bench marks, and/or “...time to process my file...” bench marks, watching your “Walk & Talk” on a camera is a great real world review. Beauty ‘ eh!
Yeah, the walkabouts are surprisingly useful even though they are not specifically repeatable
camera conspiracies is the king of anecdotal evidence. But outin the field iis where we have to use the cameras.
Outside vistas and Kasey's crazy commentary are what still bringing me back to this channel. Sadly, the original idea of finding solutions for vlogging, seems to be lost. Nowadays he walks around with these cameras that cost thousands of dollars. I don't find that relatable anymore.
You'll find that a variable ND will help greatly with vlogging, especially in the sun. You'll have a lot more options with shutter and Stop.
He doesnt like ND's
@@bigturn1051 I guess that's why this video was a motion blur overexposed disaster.
I am not a vlogger but I enjoy watching your videos when you are testing these different cameras and products. I am one of those " dreaded stills photographers" and watch your videos for the humor and insight on cameras. Bye the way I got 2 of your Camera Conspiracies shirts and they came very quickly from the time I ordered to when I received them. Looking forward to your next walk in the neighborhood.
Oh how I’ve waited for this Canon video series. I’m so excited. I’m sold on the Sony already but I’ve been holding out, patiently waiting, to see your review of these two. The fact that you have both the R5 and the R6 is a dream / nightmare come true.
I cranked up the music in the video. My neighbour yelled at me. "This isn't a discotheque. Go to bed!" It's 9 a.m.
As someone who got the R5 in the first shipment I’ve been eagerly waiting for these videos!
Okay letsgooooo! Nice vid! Glad to see some firmware improvements to make the R6 and R5 actually worth it’s weight!
Dynamic range definitely behind competition
no zebra when shooting but it look clipping to me
It beat the XT4 in side by side....
It's not as good as the A7SIII but I'd stop short of saying that it's "definitely behind the competition". If they put CLog3 in there, as they're rumored to be working on, the difference will be even more negligible.
Jaeger Schtulmann it would clog 3 adds quite a bit dynamic range
@@jaegerschtulmann How many stops do you consider "substantial"
Brett the Behemoth last time I checked I’m pretty sure Gerald undone said clog 3 brings the dynamic range up to 13 stop instead of 11
It feels like most of the RF-glass love is from photographers, and maybe from youtubers that stick to exclusive studio use. I really appreciate how you describe the settings you use as you try out different modes.
I dont want to hate but the focus breathing at 3:30 is next level.
It’s official I am now a fan of Camera Canada. Thank you guys for supporting This channel. I’ll be sure to purchase my next camera or lens through you guys.
You deserved such respect from Canon man. You reviewing most controversial questions which about no one speaks about, thank for you work, keep it great! Make most impartial review on this two babies as you can!!!
I was turned off from the R6 but this has me interested again. I do think you need to start using ND filters and shutter angles in your videos.... the high shutter speeds make it look so choppy.
This is exactly what I was thinking which makes it a bit unfair. Would probably look better with the correct(ish) shutter angle, not 1/4000
Edit: not unfair against other cameras but to itself. I would like if he used an VND to get as close as possible to correct shutter for most natural motion blur)
@@CarlBergsdorf well it is pretty fair since he does so with every camera
@@CarlBergsdorf How is it unfair if he doesn't use them on the other cameras either?
Arthur Sese in that case, yes its fair. Did not know
If he had the EF to RF variable ND adapter and used a Canon 16-35mm 2.8 lens he would have an outstanding setup. And pretty damn light too.
You picked up that A7SIII and you immediately got a perfect image in FIRST video, and it feels like with R6 you aren't getting that instant magic (but, you always get way better with new cam by like third video).
Haha his image def wasn't perfect on the first video with the Sony IMO. It was definitely close to perfect by the last video though.
Be definitely doesn't trust this Canon. I guess he'll get used to it. He keeps expecting it to overheat.
@@RichardsWorld I don't trust canon cameras right now either :(
What I like to hear is that *Fuji XT-4* is becoming the go-to compare cam. Let's go Fuji!
Yeaaaa
I like you music choices, First time watching and I can say you sense of humor is on point! haha
I never understood why people like canon colors so much, especially those standard profiles have too much contrast and saturation, I would always use log and grade myself If I was using canon cameras.
That pigeon footage w/ monarch butterfly was epic (including the music)! Do more of that!
No Cripple Hammer....? 26 minutes that I’ll never get back...
There was some skin sizzling though.
Late to the party but thought I´d share my experience with the R6 after about a year. 1080p 120 fps sucks, unfortunately. There seems to be a lack of sharpness and detail, looks almost like 720p to me. The 4K however... oh wow. The 4K60 (I use it for slowing down nature photography) is so good it makes me drool :) I´ve never even been close to over heating but then again I rarely film more than 1 minute or 2 at a time. Low light performance is great, I´ve filmed night shots at ISO 51200 and it works for my purposes (Aurora and Milky Way night time videos). I would really like 4K120 (or a useable 1080p 120) but I can´t afford an R5 and the 4K60 on the R6 looks even better than the R5.
The skin looks really muted and bad on this camera at points. The light parts of your skin looked blue and that is not good (in the outdoor test). Daylight is warm colours in this season.
That HDR mode looked worst than an iPhone.
it looked like WB was a little cool ...see how blue the sky was
Keep in mind he's shooting a Canon camera and applying Fuji LUT.
@@cooloox The colours looked off whitout the Fuji Lut. They where unnatural and muted. It didn't look realistic. And the Dynamic was terrible
Id think it's the camera at this point with the right skill and not a lot of time you can make canon rebel color looks good too
It was hilarious how you were anticipating the camera to overheat lol!
Also, no appearance by the Canon Cripple Hammer; the R6 must be doing something(s) right.
Dynamic range wasn't bad to be fair but the highlights in the sky were blown out in 4k (if I remember correctly).
Honest and hilarious content as always! 👏🏾
@0:35 hookin a brotha up😭🙌🏾😂 I knew u was my people😭🙌🏾
Everyone’s talking about the IBIS wobbles but I don’t think it looks that bad..? 😅 especially when you zoom in a little it looks great. And the 1080 looked fine to me! But I personally don’t make videos, I just watch them and this was pleasing to watch imo.
Yeah I didn't notice the "wobbles" at all until he mentioned it and I had to look really closely to see them at all. It's still better than the Sony IBIS overall and has no crop or stutter jumps like the Sony.
No, its pretty good. It more than passable. The whole idea of blogging is that its not professional, it's not meant to be. Slight wobble or jumpiness is fine.
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker if you are just Vlogging you don't need a camera in this price range.
Ordinary Filmmaker casey neistat made it work without ibis.
@@bemboing4338 The Eos R doesn't have IBIS, and the R6/R6 both have the same digital stabilization option that the R had, sooo...
19:06 that butterfly montage was lit
Man you’ re the best... i love your style. Ciao From Rome
You need to update the lens firmware mate. the enhance IS mode is really good.
He said it was the updated firmware.
@@arthursese6068 he had updated the camera, but not the lens.
@@adhi_atma It'd be even worse if he did. Hopefully he does lol.
Spoiler alert, it's not better with new firmware.
@@cameraconspiracies I think I've read that the IBIS edge wobble gets better once you use the lens at 17mm or 18mm, not at its widest.
Also, please just show us Canon colours out of the camera, not with the Fuji LUT over it.
it strange...their was not so much Toneh but somehow you stand out against the background with a 3D pop i not see you have before...it look very good
IBIS is wobbly, once your eyes see it, difficult to not keep seeing it.
Same with the R5 - especially if you are using it in conjunction with a stabilized lens. Like you over stabilized a shaky handled shot in FCPX
"Where's the primes at the wide end?"
YES.
That's a huge part of the advantage of mirrorless over SLRs too, you can make the wide lenses smaller and lighter but all Canon did was a 35mm f/1.8, that barely even counts as wide. I'm not sure what's holding them back, but it's the most frustrating thing about their whole mirrorless system. You can get EF primes, but they're bigger and heavier than the equivalent primes for Sony E mount.
Definitely frustrating, but as many people have said it is a new system and it looks like they are trying to get their bad ass stuff out first. I am certain they will follow up with some of their usual staples, eventually...
Because these cameras are still geared towards pro photographers. The video features are a plus
@@zaiENT1 By this point in the EF mount's existence there was already a 28mm f/2.8, a 24mm f/2.8 and a 15mm f/2.8 fisheye. They were gunning for the pro photographer market back then too.
@@RudolfWolph they would argue that you can use ef to rf adapters though, a pro photographer would be ok with that. A vlogger not so much.
Samyang 1.8 14mm RF mount no adapter needed.
Samyang 85mm 1.4 RF mount
Both weather sealed and work great .
Try the r5 and the R6 with the 14 mm lens
I'm so glad for Camera Canada getting all these cameras to you. Best real world reviewer. I waited for you to get these cameras as I was curious to see how the IBIS actually performs... turns out its not as great as all other youtubers claim it to be.
Really loves the jams in this one.
I think the stabilization of the Sony A7S III was better.
To be fair, we never saw the Sony at anything wider than 20mm. The wobbles get bad at superwide angles. Also the enhanced stab on the R6 looked very smooth, albeit with a significant crop
yeah, it's weird, the image was pretty shaky here. In ever other test I've seen, the R5/R6 IBIS beats the A7SIII IBIS by a fair margin until you turn on the cropped IBIS on the Sony and then that would suffer from weird stutter jumps.
Here it almost looked like he had IBIS turned off.
@@otameal we saw the Sony with the Tamron 17 - 28 😉
Corner warp is yucky. Camera shake is more forgivable.
@@DiscoverThailand My bad you are correct
Have you seen the info going around about Sony's gyro stabilization? It looks really impressive, only major downside is needing to shoot at high shutter speeds but that's never bothered you anyway. Available on ZV-1 and A7sIII
I think he mentioned something about this either last video or the one before. Too much of a waste of time stabilizing one video to be worth it. At least for vlogging purposes.
This F/2.8 20mm combo looks really nice to me. Nice gradient in the blur. Not overdone just fine.👌
It’s amazing how good those Canon Cameras are when they send you a free one!
It's amazing how good they are anyway.
One thing we can be sure about with Casey, whether sent a camera for free or not, he will be blatantly honest about it, whether good or bad.
That Opening Fuji Footage with the Samyang was out of focus. That is the problem with MF Lenses.
Good to see you excited.
Nice video, good to see more R6 content out there
I don’t know what it is, but this is my favorite gear channel
I bought an EF to EOS R adapter with control ring from Camera Canada because supplies in the U.S. were completely wiped out after the release of the R5 and R6. Didn't even take very long for the item to arrive. I still can't buy one here. Saved by Camera Canada!
R6 1080p looked way better than Xt4 1080p in the beginning
Could be the lens, will battle them with Fuji lenses today.
Fuji was definitely out of focus.. something was wrong
@@aditya_gupta He was using a manual focus lens on the fuji. The Samyang 16mm TONEH 2
@@antonhei2443 he was using samyang/rokinon 12mm toneh 2
The thing that no one talks about is how much internal sharpening canon and Nikon have. If you sharpened the hell out of the Fuji in post it may look more similar.
This isn't bad but the stabilization is really weird. It's like revolving door
There are some good footages you shot with the R6, this camera is good!
Hey Casey! I live near you and have RF35, RF15-35, RF24-105F4, RF-EF adapter, EOS R, and RP.
I was looking for this kind of test, thank you :)
look forward to the battle of X-T4 and R6! its interesting to see how APSC different to the full frame sensor
Love your videos man. Don't forget to switch the camera from the EFCS to the mechanical shutter for maximum Toneh!
I have an EF to RF mount adapter you can borrow for a few weeks if you need it.
“That auto focus is snappy!” 😂😂 I love your reviews.
14:56 is the FUJI lut in the Fuji's official website for F-log?
Yes.
@@cameraconspiracies oh... I like the color. I would like to try it to my A7iii to see if it works :) Thank you.
"... let's face it.. my channel is finished" @6:39
Now since EOS R6 has got the clog3 update, this could have been the perfect camera if there was no overheating and had all-i ..
Canon still somewhat crippled it by not providing all-i
Loving the John Woo cinema goodness with pigeons
Most annoying thing is that u cant save video settings to custom modes C1,2,3
Lol. That's the worst flaw so far. Can't Believe It.
@@80-80. its a real problem if your trying to work fast
In a review of 1.0 firmware it was said it would come in 1.1, but I guess maybe not. Canon didn't even give early reviews the 1.1, maybe going straight to 1.2
@@Vinizuca I have a 1.1 R6 and it's not possible as far I can tell.
Even the 90d can do that come on canon😅🤣
What have you done to my bank account?! I was going with the xt4, but I just can't ignore this masterpiece of a camera.
I'm ruling of thirds so hard right now.
Always great work man! Thanks for hustling!
Thats one of the major drawbacks about the R6. No real-deal shutter or aperture priority modes for video. The 80D is the same way. You have to go to a "5" level camera or the EOS R to get true shutter and/or apreture priority modes in video. Thats why it was so annoying that the R5 has overheating issues. But hopefully through firmware the R5 & R6 will get the added functionality they need.
@Kafala its Canon's method of segmenting their cameras. The Cripple Hammer 🔨 thrives to this day in the Canon Universe. 😆
But to clarify. Its not a huge problem. Its just a drawback. For locked off shots in studio or if your in a run and gun situation and you stop moving and have consistent light you can set your parameters via manual mode (which can in fact be bounced to C1-C3 position) and it will work just fine. But it is nice when you are moving to allow the camera to do most the work while you know your maintaining your desired parameter and the camera is adjusting the other two parts of the exposure triangle automatically.
8:00 focus jumps to the trees! Fuji ninjas hiding in there? How would a Canon camera know?
Welcome BACK to the cinema! :o
19:50 this scene looks pretty damn good.
Looks pretty good to me... Thanks for the great review.😊👍
If you ever find a way to custom the video modes to C1,C2,C3 please let me know! :)
"You're spraying poo with cologne", lmao that is a great way to put how Panasonic is addressing their shortcomings in AF on their newer camera's
It is worth pointing out that every single camera release has seen improvements to the DFD. When they first released it it didn't even work at all. Now It's almost as good as a bad phase detect system. And contrast detection does have a lot of advantages. It works in much lower lighting conditions, is more accurate, and in single point autofocus it's actually faster than phase detection. If they can work out the kinks in it there is the potential for it to vastly surpass phase detection autofocus. They just aren't there yet. If they do ever reach that point though they will have an exclusive autofocus system built on years of development, test designs, etc that functions unlike any other on the market and would take competition years to catch up to. In my opinion this is the direction that the Panasonic engineers are thinking to go. They obviously see an endgame in developing the DFD system or else they wouldn't have stuck to it for years. It's just a question of whether or not it ever delivers, but from their development rate it is obvious that the system is being improved with every subsequent camera.
I am returning mine. We shoot a lot of our lower end videos in 1080 60 for real estate and the "moire" is absolutely terrible around windows, blinds, and edges of furniture. The r5 does not have this problem or ALL of the cameras we have had previously. Disappointed.
When you use CLog2 outside, even if the shutter is maxed out, you are still overexposed because the lens is too fast and the base ISO of Clog is too high (i believe it's 800), you need to use an ND filter or stop down the aperture.
The recommended lowest ISO for max DR in C-log is 400. Also, if the lens is too fast stop down; increase f-stop, shutter, or use ND.
The R5 and R6 don't have CLog2 unfortunately, just CLog. I believe Canon is going to put 2 and 3 in the R5, but I don't know about the R6.
Brett the Behemoth I’ll believe it when I see it. 🤣🤣
@@aregal Yep D:
@@aregal my bad then but my point still remain, using ISO400 with a fast 2.8 outside, no wonder why he's always overexposed.
But did you figure out a way to save it to a custom mode!? 🤔
Seems like a great camera for slomo + AF stuff. Can't imagine it's easy for a camera to follow a flying butterfly at 120fps.
Use the 4k crop mode 5k oversample to 4k on the R5 and use a Cheap 18-55mm IS Kit Lens and you have your perfect camera. no overheat, the best stabilization, great colors and High quality video.
Yea 6 grand for an aps-c camera with kit lens.
That sounds like way too much of a compromise for a nearly $4000 camera. Especially when you don't have to make compromises like that with the a7sIII. Which is $300 less than the r5
@@cameraconspiracies Still beats $5500 for the A7SIII which has 2007 photo tech.
What you're describing is not a reasonable compromise.
Camera Conspiracies you are always comparing the Xt4 with any camera and the APSC beat everyone and you keep thinking that the sensor size matters? Is 5k oversample to 4k sensor size not matters for that situation. Of course the camera have other functions that work in full frame for other situations but full frame for vlogging is not a good choice, that doesnt mean that you use that camera in crop mode for everything but for vloging make sense. Have oversample 5k without overheat, IBIS, lens stab, and a wide shot is not that the perfect camera that you are looking for?
Holy Shit, Sony Alpha Ad pops up right before this Canon R6 vlog starts😂😂😂
Is it just me, or is the motion pretty jerky in the 2nd half of this. Once I noticed it i could stop focusing on it.
1/1000th of a shutter, wideangle ibis jerk, 30 fps on a 24 fps timeline,
pretty meh rolling shutter(it uses the 1dx mark 3 sensor which for some reason can do full sensor 60 fps(16.6ms of rolling shutter) but if you set it to 30 fps/24 fps it has 33.3ms of rolling shutter, which is pretty bad)
The canon auto exposure reminds me of pannys autofocus.
Register in the wrench menu to save into Custom modes. You can also download PDF manual and search or stuff ;)
Thanks!
That doesn't work in the R6, only R5.
@@cameraconspiracies Sorry, my bad. Thought you were out with he R5... was commenting while watching.
The enhanced mode was buttery smooth
I like the Nikon autoexposure better.
With the Nikon Z lens line up I think you'll be excited by Nikon for video when they finally get IBIS.
(they have a 20mm f1.8)
16:53 The one time I didn’t want a autofocus system to work. Damn you Canon 🔨
Music on the pigeon/butterfly sequence too dope lol
“Hot, hand-burning mode”!! LOL!!
Love to see my camera being tested by Casey!!!
There is the high quality mode. It has the option to enable or disable. By default it is disabled. You a find the setting in the same area where you select the video resolution. Its right below where you turn on high frame rate.
This is the R6 not the R5.
@@cameraconspiracies Yeah, I realize that now... Thought you were out with he R5. Must be nice to have both side by side. You'll get so much material out of them.
1080p quality looks like very very nice.
15:55 That Avatar LUT though... please use that more often than not!
Nice butterfly. Anyway, if you want a wide-angle prime lens for FF mirrorless you could look at the Nikon 20mm F1.8, Sony do a 20mm F1.8 & Panasonic have the Sigma 20mm F1.4. I am not aware of any native wide-angle lenses for RF mount yet, the only one I could see was the Samyang 14mm F2.8. Canon needs to make one quick, just for you!
The R6 is cool in a lot of ways but it definitely feels like it got less development love from Canon than the R5. Not even crazy cutting edge stuff, just normal usability stuff. Here's what I've noticed:
- Indeed there's no way to save video settings to C1,2,3 that I know of. The R5 can do this from what I've seen.
- The joystick doesn't do anything half the time. It works like you'd expect in the menus, but then when you go to image review, left and right do nothing-- on every other camera that flips to the previous and next picture, respectively. You _have_ to use the rotary wheel on the back, which, by the way, is no longer a D-pad/wheel combo. It's just a wheel. Also lets you navigate around the Q menu but pressing in on the joystick doesn't select anything, you have to press the "set" or shutter button.
-No shutter or aperture priority modes in video; it's either full auto or full manual. WHY?
-Setting custom white balance is still a pain in the ass (this is the case on the R5 too to be fair though)
-The R6 has what I'd describe as a 7-10% crop when shooting in 4K. The R5 does not crop unless you tell it to.
The R5 also has a lot more codec, resolution, and framerate options (although strangely no 1080p in any mode above 60fps).
Canon seemed over exposed often. But I do like the image quality. especially that butterfly shot looked really nice. I am an all manual type of guy using blackmagic cameras so I think if you tried that and exposed properly you'd be in business with this canon. pretty sure you like to just film and upload without colour correcting stuff though, so I get it.
So, the hdr mode... it studders.
The enhanced stab.... was actually fantastic! And I'm usually NOT impressed by anyone's stabilization on a mirrorless cam yet. ( the regular stab...junk).
I expect Sony to position the A7C and its rumored smaller, lighter lenses, as a key competitive differentiator against the heavier Canon lenses. Weight does matter when you need to carry the equipment for a while.
I’d borrow you my ef sigma 20mm 1.4 with the nd rf to ef adapter, if I get it back! ;-)
Be careful or he might sell it.
No, you lend, he borrows!
Richard Bierman thx teach
9:45 that actually looks really good !
I think that canon will eventually get you the vlog lens in the small focal length prime, but they’re pretty focused on drawing the professional photographers with the immaculate, bank breaking lenses for the moment.
That’s the hesitation I have with R5 and R6 is if you are ok in 1080 or 4K non HQ, why buy it there are so many good 1080 cameras and 4K non HQ cameras is the price these are going for it worth the upgrade? 🤔 I dunno I have a tough time with that.
The em log mode was the best looking footage in this video. This videos color looked straight out of mad max.
fuji seems to expose for the skin in auto iso canon seems to exposure for the sky/highlights.
Man I can't wait for my r6 comes in, this looks so damn good
I love this dude. He’s so funny 😂😂😂