Enjoyed your video. I recently inadvertently tested the weather resistance of the 16 F2.8. Three days ago, it fell out of my camera pack when I did a face plant while snowshoeing. By the time I was able to retrieve it, the lense had sat in the snow for about 40 hours, during which time the temperature had fallen overnight to minus 21 Celsius. After carefully thawing it out in stages and drying it with silica gel packs, I tested and was delighted to find it is in working order. Quite a tough little lense.
Ian, great story! Yes, the X Series cameras and lenses are quite durable indeed. I've abused my gear quite a bit and it's all survived just fine, and I've heard that from others, too. A friend of mine dropped his 56mm 1.2 lens in a glacial stream. He dried it out in a bag of rice, and then just left it for six months. Came back later and it worked just fine! Someone else I know dropped her Fuji X20 camera on the trail, where it sat for three months out in the element. It even got chewed on by a bear. She eventually found it, brought it home, put a fresh batter in it, and the camera worked just fine! You can read the story here: danbaileyphoto.com/blog/fuji-x-camera-survives-3-months-out-in-the-elements/ So yea... tough indeed!!
This is the weirdest thing! Today I was in the local camera store buying some SD cards. The sales assistant mentioned he had a whole load of used Fuji lenses just in. We had a look at them - and I plumped for this very lens! Thanks for the video; perfect timing.
Score!!! That's awesome, Ray!! Probably some guy who had it in his mind that going up to full frame would make him a better photographer. 🤣 To your advantage, though!! Glad you were able to grab this one, it's a great little lens!!
Thanks so much for your comment! How exciting, indeed!! I'm sure you'll love the little 16 2.8; it's become my tiny wide angle of choice. What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
Muchas gracias, justamente mostraste fotografías de retrato que es algo que me interesaba ver con este lente, y parece que es una increíble opción para documentar. Buen video y buenas fotos! Gracias
Thank you for your comment. Yes, the XF16mm lens is a great choice for photographing environmental portraits where you show the subject within their surroundings. This helps tell the story of the scene and how the person fits within the background. Which Fujifilm camera are you using?
Thanks for your comment! Yes, it really is a fun little lens, definitely favorite white angle these days. What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
@@DanBaileyPhoto Hi Dan , thanks for your kind reply . I use an X-T4 and go for landscape , street and flowers ! Love the colours and variety recipes provide too
Thanks Dan. These videos have been so helpful in determining my lens choices for my Colorado Trail thru hike next year (July 2024). Peace and happy trails.
Thanks very much for your comment, I'm glad you're enjoying my videos! This 16mm would make for an excellent thru-hike lens indeed! Which Fuji model are you currently using?
@@DanBaileyPhoto I’ve got the XT3. Thinking either the XF 10-24 f/4 WR OIS, XF 16 f2.8 WR and/or Samyang 12mm f/2 Manual Focus for Astro. Tough choices. I have a SLIK 450g like 3.5 foot tripod I may bring if I do Astro. Surprisingly, XT3 with lens is so light, that this mini tripod can even handle the weight in portrait orientation. Gotta love aps-c weight savings. Thanks for your response btw- made my afternoon.
For astrophotography, among those three you listed, I would probably recommend the Samyang 12mm. That has a proven track record with night sky shooters. The Fuji 16mm 2.8 is a great lens, but it's really hard to manually focus a lens in the dark that doesn't have a hard stop at infinity. You really want that feature if you do lots of nighttime shooting. Same with the XF10-24. However, the Fuji 16mm f/1.4 has a focus clutch, which means it does have a hard stop. This would be a good choice, as well, or the XF14mm f/2.8.
Great video and some lovely images to go with it! I have both 16mm lenses but use the 2.8 way more than the 1.4. Superb image quality for such a small lens!
Hi Richard, thanks for your comment. I never had a strong desire to get the 1.4 version, mostly because for the size, weigh and cost, and because it’s a very close focal length to my 14. However, I was intrigued by the 2.8 version as soon as it was announced, and I’m really enjoying it. Sounds like you are, too. What do you like to shoot with it?
Hello! I found your video while were searching information about this lens. I've just bought it for my Fujifilm xt2 and now I'm waiting for delivering it. I had the 16-55mm lens before, so I had an imagination about the angle. I think, it will great for me. I like street, landscapes and so on. Thank you for the review.
Thanks so much for your comment, I'm glad I could help! I'm sure you'll have a ton of fun with the new 16mm f/2.8 when it arrives, it's such a great little lens!
Thanks for this video! I found you while searching for X-T1 content to prepare for my new to me/used Fuji X-T1 and the only lens I could afford to buy - the 16 2.8. It was either this one or the 14 2.8. I’m glad to gave found your channel- new subscriber.
Hi Laura, thanks for your comment. I'm glad you found my channel! Congratulations on your new X-T1; that was such a groundbreaking camera when it was first introduced, and it was the camera that put me over the top and made me switch to Fuji. You should watch my X-T1 retrospective video here: th-cam.com/video/93UjJKzSnr4/w-d-xo.html Both the 14 and 16 are great lenses, but for the price, size and the weather sealing, the 16 2.8 is hard to beat. You'll have fun with it, I'm sure. What kinds of subjects do you like to shoot?
@@DanBaileyPhoto Actually the video you linked was the first one I saw. What an amazing journey with Fujifilm you’ve had! I’m a beginner photographer so I’m doing mostly family, pets, animal shelter photos and videos, landscapes and mild wildlife. I have a Canon 7D so the X-T1 will make a nice companion to it.
Indeed! You'll find the X-T1 to be an excellent companion to your Canon, but beware... it may quickly grow on your and cause you to fall out of love with your big camera! 😱🤣 Have fun with your new Fuji and let me know if you have any questions about its functions.
Very helpful and clarifying, as I have just got this item, I am looking forward to try it in my XPro 1. Many thanks for such a pleasant interesting video.
Thanks so much for your comment, Jose. Glad you enjoyed this, and yes, the 16 is a really great lens! What kinds of things do you like to shoot with your X-Pro 1?
@@DanBaileyPhoto Hi Dan, basically I m now trying to explore it in street shooting and landscapes as well. I mean exploring, taking into consideration that I have changed this "new" unit, by selling my almost brand new 11 years old Fujifilm X10 that I did not enjoy properly as I did not like it very much.
Hey Gary - Awesome!! The X-T3 and 16 f/2.8 is an awesome combo! I'm sure you're going to have of fun with that setup. What kinds of subjects do you like to shoot?
That's always nice when you have some ROI, but then again, doing it purely as a creative passion does take the pressure off. The fun part is that you never know where it might lead.
I don't know. Those Red Badge lenses are really amazing. According to this review, the 16mm 2.8 may be a little big sharper at 16mm than the 16-55, but probably not by much, and the overall versatility of the 16-55 makes this a very usable lens. Of course, the 16 2.8 is so much smaller and lighter. This is the deal maker for me, so you just need to decide what's more important, the small compact form factor, or the versatility of the zoom. What kinds of subjects do you like to shoot? fstoppers.com/originals/comparing-three-fujifilm-16mm-f28-lenses-417489
I have this lens and use it on my X-E3 body. The combination is light and compact and can go anywhere. It is an excellent lens and a bargain. I also love the 23mm f/2.0, which spends even more time on my X-E3 as that is my favorite focal length.
Thanks for your comment, Danny. Yes, the 16 makes for an excellent wide angle on small X-E3 body. That's a great combo, especially when paring with the 35 f/2. What kinds of subjects do you like to shoot?
@@DanBaileyPhoto I've been shooting since the 60's when my dad got me an Instamatic :) I like nature, landscape, street and automotive photography. Learning watch photography currently.
Cool! My dad gave me an Instamatic in the 70's. I've used a couple of them over the years; the one that look like an ice cream sandwich, and the X-35 which looks more like a rangefinder camera. I still have that one sitting on my desk!
The 16/2.8 is my favorite lens! It lives on my camera. In my small bag, I also have the 35/2 and two Laowa lenses: the 9/2.8 and the 65/2.8 2:1 macro, which is super sharp. That set of 4 lenses is nicely spaced with about 2x focal length increments. And it all fits with the XT4 in a 5 liter sling bag!!! But when I hike, I always take the 16/2.8 and usually one of the others depending upon what I expect to shoot or how I’m feeling that day. Right now, I’m toying with the idea to sell the 9/2.8 and get the 10-24mm, but I would definitely keep the 16/2.8 for its tiny size.
Hey Karl, sounds like you've got a great setup with those lenses!! A few really useful focal lengths, that don't take up very much room in your bag. I agree, the 16 f/2.8 is such an ideal lens for hiking. I'm so glad I finally got it! What kinds of subjects do you like to shoot?
@@DanBaileyPhoto Thanks, Dan! I truly enjoy your TH-cam channel! I mostly do a lot of “run-and-gun” landscape. Sounds crazy, I know, but I love my wife despite her impatience. So run and gun it is. We love to hike and explore National Parks, State Parks, coastlines, mountains, deserts, small towns, unknown jewels within big cities, and anywhere that is beautiful. Further, I don’t do traditional street photography, but I do a modified version of that along West Cliff Drive at the coast in Santa Cruz, CA, where we live. It is much more open than a city, so my 55-200mm is perfect for that. I get tons of gorgeous, anonymous shots of quirky locals with stunning backdrops, especially at sunset. It’s a magical place!! I’m blessed to live in such a fantastic spot. I’ve also been building a discrete Ford Transit camper van to further our explorations. BTW, I’ve been shooting the excellent XT1 for seven years, but just finally upgraded to the XT4. OMG!!!! It’s amazing. The IBIS and better focus has rejuvenated my love for my 56/1.2. And now you’ve heard of my entire lens collection!!! 9/2.8, 16/2.8, 35/2, 56/1.2, 65/2.8 macro, and 55-200. I will add the 10-24 next. And then maybe the 50/2. For gear, I love the lenses, but also the Fuji bodies with their “retro”dials. My dad bought me a manual SLR when I graduated middle school in ‘79, and Fuji alone seems to understand my connection to photography. We are really lucky to have Fuji, as well as the freedoms and beauty we enjoy in our lives all around us.
Cool! Thanks for sharing! Yes, the X-T4 is an amazing upgrade to the X-T1. Keep having tons of fun with your Fuji gear and thanks so much for your feedback. I’m glad you’re enjoying my channel! Take care. 👍
I wanted the 16 1.4, but the 16 2.8 was just 250€ used in very good condition. I couldnt pass that offer up and bought it. It's a really fun lens and enjoy this change of field of view. I usually use the 35 1.4 or 50 2 and love them. I need a zoom Lens now and maybe I will get the 16 1.4 one day. Good video, btw :)
Probably a good choice. It's hard to make extra $600 jump to the 1.4 version, when the 2.8 will do just fine for most scenes, and it will weigh a lot less in your bag. I think you'll find that it will compliment your existing setup nicely. 16/35/50 is one of my favorite lens combinations, as well! Thanks so much for your comment. What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
@@DanBaileyPhoto Definitely a Fuji shooter. There is no substitute. X-T2. I've just about had them all. Nothing compares to the modern Fuji or film era Nikons.
As @venom2k2 indicated, the 16 2.8 is indeed labeled "Super EBC" right on the front of the lens, so yes, it does have the super electron beam coating, which helps reduce ghosting and flare.
Hey there, thanks for you comment! I do love the 16 f/2.8. This is my primary wide angle lens that I use and travel with. I haven't used the 16-80 very much. It's a good lens, but I've always preferred fixed lenses in the wide to middle range. The zoom does offer versatility in that you can have two or three main focal length ranges in a single lens, and that can obviously be a huge benefit when traveling or going with a very lightweight and compact setup. Hope that helps. What kinds of scenes/locations do you like to shoot?
I use it at street, indoors, when I shoot inconspicuously, urban landscapes, if I'm too lazy to yearn for large and heavy lenses. This lens focuses very quickly on all Fujifilm cameras including old cameras, the photographer does not look professional with it, so people around or security guards of various departments almost never pay attention to me, it is weatherproof, in addition , one of my cameras - X-H1 - has IBIS, and this lens can shoot at a shutter speed of 1/8 sec, then I can use it for night shots. And, I bought it in 98-99 condition for 220 USD...
Yes, my X Series guide has been updated to cover all models up through the new 5th gen cameras, including X-T5, X-H2 and X-H2S. What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
Excellent video Dan. I have the 23 1.4, which I use a lot as it = 35 mm in 35 SLR focal length. Sure, if you want the Rolex, those can go for the 16 1.4, however, I just do not need the speed for landscape-type work, I tend to shoot wider, so the 2.8, at the price point is just very hard to go past. As with watches, a Rolex will not really keep any better time than my car clock! Samee with the 16 2.8 v 16 1.4. Good luck to those who can afford it.
Hi Robert, I also have the 23 1.4. For those times when I do want that particular focal length, I've got it nailed with this lens. For most of my other sooting, though, I do usually prefer to go a little bit wider. That's when the 16 really comes in handy. And yes, the 2.8 version is hard to beat!
Hi Dan. I appreciate your expertise and enjoy your positive attitude and enthusiasm. I have the 15-45mm which I bought as a kit lens for an extra $50 when I purchased my X-T30. The cost was a no brainer to me, knowing it may end up later as a 'backup' to a better lens. I'm thinking it may be the time. Having used the 15-45 for over a year, I think it's underrated when used as a wide angle lens. I understand all of the build and operating criticisms of the lens, but the photos at the wider end of the lens (I use it primarily for it's wide end) come out sharp and look fine to my eyes. I have never used the 16 2.8. I like primes, I like the focal length, it's clearly a more solid lens, weather resistant, etc. but I wonder if I'd see any improved performance in the final result over the 15-45. I suppose my decision to spend $399 boils down to preference and handling (clearly to me the 16 2.8 will a better experience), but I'd like to hear your thoughts on the two. PS My photography 'style' is wide to mid, small light lenses and cameras for travel and general walk-around. I also have the excellent 35 1.4, the 55-200 (rarely used or carried other than when I know it will be needed for its telephoto range), and my still loved and carried X100T. Thanks.
Scott, as you've noticed, the Fuji 15-45 is a surprisingly good lens with regards to image quality, especially at the wide range of the zoom. For the most part, the glass inside that lens is very good. It's not like Fuji has separate "good glass" and "ok glass" factories. You're right, most of the difference in price boils down to the build and design features, which were maximized to make the lens extremely lightweight and inexpensive for pairing with the X-A series cameras. There will be obvious build differences between this lens and the 16mm f/2.8, and you will see a slight optical difference that will result from these. The main difference is that the 16mm has 9 aperture blades, compared to 7 blades on the 15-45. This will translate to better looking bokeh and a more pleasing look on out-of-focus background subjects. Other than that, both lenses have ED and aspherical elements and Super EBC coating, so they'll both perform extremely well in a variety of situations. The 15-45 is a real sleeper in the line, and if you can get past the funky design and mechanics, then it's a great little lens. The kicker will be if you want a more traditional style lens that has more durable construction and weather sealing. As you say, preference, handling characteristics and weather sealing. I'd recommend trying one out in a store and seeing what you think. Hope that helps.
@@DanBaileyPhoto Thanks for the comprehensive reply. As an afterthought, I 'd be happiest if Fujifilm upgraded the 15-45 into a metal housing, scrapped the power zoom, and added an aperture ring.
Hi Dan! Greetings from Italy :) I reallly appreciate your videos, and now I have a question for you. I own a Fuji X-T3, combined with XF35mm F2, and I am now considering a wide angle. I have the opportunity of buying a 16 f2.8 or a 14 f2.8 almost at the same price. What Is your suggestion between the two? Thank you!
Hey there!!! That's a tough decision. Both are fantastic lenses and I really like both of them. The 16mm f/2.8 is weather-sealed and a bit more compact for travel, so that's a hard one to beat. I do love the 14mm f/2.8, but since getting the 16mm, I don't use it as often, simply because the 16 is a bit smaller. However, for night/astro photography, the 14 is definitely the better choice, because it has a hard stop on the focus ring at infinity, which makes it WAY easier to focus in the dark. Hope that helps. What kinds of subjects do you like to shoot?
@@DanBaileyPhoto a lot of things; people, landscapes, my grandchildren , seascapes, buildings... This lens can be used in so many situations. And it is so portable!
@@DanBaileyPhoto i have the xf18-55, xf55-200 and xf27mm. I like to do various genres, nature landscape, cityscape, night photo, still life, and much more.
That's a decent setup. Two zooms to cover the full range, and then a fast, mid-range prime. I think that's an excellent way to go. It's always good to have at least one fast prime, and the 27mm is a great, tiny little lens. Do you have the weather sealed 27, or the original?
@@DanBaileyPhoto I have the original 27mm and I love it. super compact super light and with excellent image quality. if I really have to find a fault, I would have preferred a minimum distance of closer focus, but hey, you can't always have everything 😄😄
Hey Joe, not sure. I did see that Sigma announced their upcoming Fuji mount lenses. I don't usually try every X Mount lens that gets released, but I'd certainly be open to the idea. Just by the looks of it, though, the Sigma 16 is a little bigger than would I would typically want for an X Series lens, but you never know. I've been impressed by what I've seen from them during the past few years, especially in their ART line. Is this a lens that interests you?
@@DanBaileyPhoto It could possibly interest me. Fuji's 16 mm prime has an aperture ring and Sigma does not. Sigma is about $100 more for their 1.4 over Fuji's 2.8. I have been reading Sigma's image quality is better. However, I am just a hobbyist so I don't know if it will be worth paying $100 more. By the way, your X-series unlimited book is fantastic. Learning so much about my xt-3.
Thanks for buying my Fuji ebook, I'm glad you're finding it to be such a helpful resource. Regarding the Sigma, as I said, I've been impressed by their Art line lenses, and while I haven't seen any direction comparisons, I'm sure it will produce great looking imagery. Most modern lenses do, so it really becomes a matter of which form factor you prefer in a lens, or for that matter, a camera.
Thanks Dan for a great video again 😄👍. I am thinking of buying a 16 mm prime. Before seeing this video I was thinking of the 1.4. Want to use it indoor with low light. But now I am not so sure anymore ☺️. Could go for the 2.8 and raise the ISO if needed? Its cheaper and I use the money on the 100-400 mm 😉
Yes, absolutely. With the excellent higher ISO performance of the Fuji cameras and a 2.8 wide angle lens like the 16mm, I don't think you'll feel very inhabited in lower light conditions, and you'll still get great results. By comparison, the 16 1.4 is certainly a great lens, but it's quite a bit heavier and more expensive, and as you said, you could always put the difference towards a 100-400. Combining that with long zoom with the 16 2.8, would give you a truly excellent, pro-quality combination for shooting a wide range of subjects!!
Hey Chuck. The 18 is an older design, and Fuji has made a lot of advancements since then with regard to lens design. The 18 is a fun little lens and incredibly compact, but the 16 has better edge to edge sharpness, faster, snappier autofocus, and it’s weather sealed. Plus, I like that it’s wider, and it costs $200 less than the 18. I’ve enjoyed using the 18 in the past, but I’ll choose the 16 over the 18 any day.
Dan, great video. I continue to see, as I did in your photos, images taken with the 16mm 2.8 that just have some awesome ability to "pop", almost 3D like. Micro contrast? Is that the reason? Look at your image of the guy in yellow by the plane. That's what I mean. It's something special this lens seems to be able to render. Or am I imagining it?
Bill, thanks for your comment. The yellow plane guy is actually an older picture, shot with a different lens, just to illustrate how well wide angle lenses can be used for environmental portraits. That was was shot with flash and processed a little bit. All the other shots (aside from the initial collage) are from the new 16 2.8, through. To my eyes, the picture that best illustrates the kind of amazing 3D quality that this lens has is the lead-off orange poppy/green grass shot. That's a straight JPEG, and it just zings out of the frame. Definitely has that right, vibrant "Fuji" look.
@@DanBaileyPhoto Thanks Dan. I'll check it out again. I keep seeing that effect in images from Fuji shooters who talk about that lens. I don't see comments about it, but my eyes just see something in a few of the images from that lens that I haven't seen in the 1.4. Appreciate the quick feedback!
Bill, there's definitely something special about the ways that the X Series cameras and lenses render subjects and reproduce colors. After all, color and high quality lenses are their legacy, which turns 88 years old today!
That faster 1.4 aperture definitely comes in handy when you need it, but there are a lot of times when a smaller, lighter, more compact lens really fits the bill! What Fuji do you use and what kinds of subjects do you like to shoot with your 16?
Dan, u r really the champion of Fujicrons. Do u feel any itch to get the 23F2 to complete the collection? 😄 I really enjoy 16F2.8. Super light on my XT4. I occasionally wish I had the 1.4 for the bokeh n low light, but 2.8 is small and light that makes u wanna carry and shoot more. Cheers
Thanks, Bun. No, not really. I find that for most scenes that I shoot, between the 14/16, 35 and 50, I feel that I'm covered in the wide to middle range. I actually have the 23 f/1.4 as well, so if I do really want that focal length, I've got the option.
I'm on the fence, 14mm f2.8 or the 16 f2.8, I really can't make up my mind the 14mm has the same hood (1 hood in bag for both) and filter size as my 18-55 zoom and then my viltrox 85mm, job done
Hi Ashton, that's a tough one. As I mentioned, I don't have a bad thing to say about the 14, it's an absolutely amazing lens. It's a little bit bigger than the 16, but it does offer a gorgeous view angle when you look through it. I would say that since you already have the 18-55, then go for the 14 since it has a bigger view angle difference than the 18-55. Hope that helps. What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
@@DanBaileyPhoto hi Dan i got an xt3 and an x100f, TRY (haha) to photograph my daughter with the horses, wide comes in handy in the stables, my 2 little lurchers, take my camera on country walks, architecture anything really, just love making pictures, thanks for replying. Al good advice about the 14MM difference I'll go with that. Thanks
I wonder how this lens compares to the new 18mm f1.4, the rumors are the 18mm has enough resolution for the new 40mp apsc fuji sensor. I'm waiting to see if fuji actually releases an XH2 or XT5 with 40mp. It wouldn't be good if the older lenses don't have enough resolution for 40mp. I'm a landscape guy and love my XT3. I'm looking at the GFX 50sII and waiting to see if this 40mp camera will be a reality.
Hey Keith, that new 18mm f/1.4 looks like a fantastic lens, with outstanding resolution and image quality. It's definitely bigger and heavier than the 16 2.8. There's quite a bit more glass inside there. To compare, the 18 f/1.4 is 13 oz, the barrel is almost twice the width, and it takes a filter size of 62mm, whereas the 16 f/2.8 has a 49mm filer ring. With regards to whether the older lenses will be able to resolve on a higher MP sensor, I have read various things on this. I know that the original XF lenses were designed with higher MP sensors in mind, even though they didn't exist at the time. Knowing the history and quality of Fuji glass, my guess is they would make lenses that would remain capable, even as the system evolved. I haven't really paid attention the rumors, so we'll see what the future brings! For now I'll just keep having fun with my existing cameras and lenses and worry about that later, if the issue does arise.
Thanks Dan, I am hoping the older lenses will be ok. I love my 100-400mm. I would love a 40mp sensor for the resolution. I don't like the weight of medium format so I'm in stand by mode.
Keith, I would have full confidence that the Fuji pro-quality "red badge" lenses, like the 100-400 will indeed continue to perform well, even as the number of pixels continue to rise in the future.
I am thinking I might trade in my Fuji 10-24 for this lens after watching this video. It's a great lens but I find I don't use it that much and it is bulky to carry. I also have the 18-55 for a zoom in that range. Is the image quality just as good as the 10-24? I have heard the 16mm is one of the best lenses Fuji makes. Responses from anyone would be helpful.
Robert, I don’t have the 10-24, so I can’t compare side by side, but yes, the 16 has extremely good image quality. The 10-24 is a very good lens, but personally, I’d much rather have a small prime in the wide angle range than a larger, heavier zoom. Yes, if you need extra wide, the 10-24 has it, but for me, I just prefer a smaller lens, and I think for most subjects, the 16 focal length is wide enough and more useful in a wider range of scenes. So, with that in mind. Trading the 10-24 for the 16 might not be a bad option.
O Dan, here you go getting me in to trouble again. :) Trying to focus on Inc. Taxes and you are waving "Buy Me" flags in front of me. I am, however thinking of selling a couple of my lens that I have rarely ever used in the field. So really, this is really just good planning!! Going to practice that pitch!! Thanks Dan.
I have both the 16mm f/1.4 and the f/2.8. The faster lens is every bit as good as the hype around it, a fantastic optic. The f/2.8 lens is on my camera when I need 16mm about 80% of the time. Its smaller, lighter and fast to focus. If I'm in good light and know that I'll be shooting in the f/4 to f/11 range, then I don't feel that I give up much by forgoing the faster lens. To be sure, when you know that you will need f/1.4, there is no substitute. If you can, own both. Incidentally, many reviews say the slower lens is a bit wider than the marked 16mm, maybe 15mm. I've never did a side by side comparison.
Hi Albert - I agree, the 16 1.4 is an amazing lens. A full-on pro-quality optic in every way. It's just bigger and heavier than I prefer for that kind of focal length. I had that with my old Nikon 14 2.8, and I'm through with super heavy primes, which is why I love the small Fuji primes so much. One area where the 16 1.4 excels is shooting at night, for things like aurora and astro photography. The clutch focus makes it so much easier to focus in the dark, and that's when those extra stops make all the difference. But yes, for most other subjects, the 2.8 version will get you by with flying colors. Regarding the "actual" focal length, I hadn't heard that, and I haven't done any tests either. Who knows...? Anyway, thanks for your comment. What kinds of subjects are you shooting these days?
@@DanBaileyPhoto I too came up on Nikon gear and the 24mm f/2.8 AI-s was in my kit always. I remember the late, great Galen Rowell said in an article that he used the 24mm most often, and he said he could survive with just a 24mm and 85mm if he had to. The only reason that I own the 16mm f/1.4 is that it was the only 16mm when I went full-Fuji, and because of my decades of Nikon shooting, I knew I had to have the 24mm equivalent. The 2.8 came out and at $400, I had to give it a go.
@@albertsmith9315 Hi. We have the same thought--The 16/1.4 is my only Fuji 1.4 lens I have BUT I'm thinking of getting rid of it for two prime lenses -- The 16/2.8 and the 27/2.8ii. I use the 16/1.4 often when I'm documenting my family and travels. But, like Mr. Bailey, I'm finding it bulky. Yet, I'm hesitant in getting rid of it because inside malls, often you need more light. 2.8 may not cut it. Your thoughts, Mr. Smith? Thank you.
@@nathanielngosy When I was shooting film, f/2.8 could be a deal breaker. Film did not have the quality after ISO 400 that any modern digital camera today has even up to ISO 3200. I shoot at high ISO without much thought these days. I keep my 16mm f/1.4 for its rendering, its superior close focusing potential and for the manual focus clutch that has a true DOF scale for hyper and zone focusing. If I can tolerate the size and weight, this lens it unbeatable. For casual outings, the f/ 2.8 version if fine. I will always have both.
The 16mm 2.8 Fujinon is one of the cutest lenses ever, esp w/lens hood! However... it's nowhere near the IQ of the 14mm, more like the 18mm f2, which is... And I just find the 24mm equivalent perspective such an "in between" focal length, doesn't have the sweeping goodness of a 20/21mm e, more like an overly stretched out 28mm e. The new 18mm 1.4 has phenomenal IQ- it's just Too Big, and Too Expensive! Wish they had just upgraded the f2, or made a 1.8 with a 58mm diameter- I would presently, joyfully own either of the latter two, instead of begrudgingly using the f2, or using the much better 18mm on the Ricoh GR.
Hi Stan, thanks for your comment. I agree, the 16 2.8 is indeed a darling little lens!! 😍 It definitely has better performance than the 18mm f/2, but you're right, not near as good as the excellent 14mm. And I'm with you, the new 18 1.4 looks incredible, but too big and heavy for my style. An upgraded 18 f/2 would be nice, but between the 16 and 14, I'm pretty much set, and at some point you just start to have too much redundancy in your kit, and that only bogs you down. With those two lens, I hardly use my 18 anymore. What kinds of subjects do you like to shoot?
Samuel, as with many modern lenses, the optics are not distortion free, but if you shoot Jpeg, then the camera’s internal processor will apply corrections that will eliminate nearly all of it. Same happens if you shout RAW and apply the correct lens profile. So, effectively, your final images will show a minimal amount of distortion.
Perhaps a tiny bit, but today’s lenses and lens correction profiles do an amazing job. Also, perfect, 100% sharpness alone isn’t the only thing that defines the character and feel of a lens. A lot of older, and very classic lenses had slight imperfections, but the overall character of how they portrayed subject matter far outweighed that fact. It’s the same with just about any kind of artistic tool, because ultimately, art and creativity isn’t about protection, it’s about drawing the viewer/listener in and engaging them with compelling content and message.
@@DanBaileyPhoto i own this 16 f2.8 but I'm not really soddisfated, yes it's a good lens with a good optical performance, really lighter, not expensive and really small but in my opinion got to much distorsion, it's a little bit softer at the edges and got no to much character. I'm thinking about switching to xf14mm
That wouldn’t be a bad choice. I do love the 16 2.8, but ultimately the 14 has higher quality optics. You’ll find that there’s definitely less distortion in that lens.
Great video 👌🤩 I too love the 16mm focal length as the sweet spot!! I’ve just sold my 16mm 1.4 and I’m going to buy the 16mm f2.8 and 35mm f2 ,50mm f2 and together with my 90mm is my complete travel kit too
Sweet spot indeed!!! I agree, that combo makes for an incredibly capable and lightweight travel photography kit!! Have fun with it!! What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
@@DanBaileyPhoto I’m using a variety of Fuji x series’s cameras like the xt4,xh1,xt2 and xe3 together with my gfx 50r camera plus I’ve got nearly every Fuji lens and I mostly like landscape photography and street photography and I love watching your videos 👌
@@Pixelpeeps-69 Hi. I have the 16/1.4 but thinking of selling it for a 16/2.8 and, perhaps, a 27/2.8ii for their compact sizes. But curiously, why did you sell your 16/1.4?
@@nathanielngosy 18mm 1.4 is sharper and a more versatile focal length than the 16mm 1.4 but I believe as a general purpose lens the 16mm 2.8 is all one needs
Enjoyed your video. I recently inadvertently tested the weather resistance of the 16 F2.8. Three days ago, it fell out of my camera pack when I did a face plant while snowshoeing. By the time I was able to retrieve it, the lense had sat in the snow for about 40 hours, during which time the temperature had fallen overnight to minus 21 Celsius. After carefully thawing it out in stages and drying it with silica gel packs, I tested and was delighted to find it is in working order. Quite a tough little lense.
Ian, great story! Yes, the X Series cameras and lenses are quite durable indeed. I've abused my gear quite a bit and it's all survived just fine, and I've heard that from others, too. A friend of mine dropped his 56mm 1.2 lens in a glacial stream. He dried it out in a bag of rice, and then just left it for six months. Came back later and it worked just fine!
Someone else I know dropped her Fuji X20 camera on the trail, where it sat for three months out in the element. It even got chewed on by a bear. She eventually found it, brought it home, put a fresh batter in it, and the camera worked just fine! You can read the story here: danbaileyphoto.com/blog/fuji-x-camera-survives-3-months-out-in-the-elements/
So yea... tough indeed!!
This is the weirdest thing! Today I was in the local camera store buying some SD cards. The sales assistant mentioned he had a whole load of used Fuji lenses just in. We had a look at them - and I plumped for this very lens! Thanks for the video; perfect timing.
Score!!! That's awesome, Ray!! Probably some guy who had it in his mind that going up to full frame would make him a better photographer. 🤣 To your advantage, though!! Glad you were able to grab this one, it's a great little lens!!
Your energy is great, made me smile :) Expecting my 16 f2.8 in the mail and am excited to get shooting
Thanks so much for your comment! How exciting, indeed!! I'm sure you'll love the little 16 2.8; it's become my tiny wide angle of choice. What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
Muchas gracias, justamente mostraste fotografías de retrato que es algo que me interesaba ver con este lente, y parece que es una increíble opción para documentar. Buen video y buenas fotos! Gracias
Thank you for your comment. Yes, the XF16mm lens is a great choice for photographing environmental portraits where you show the subject within their surroundings. This helps tell the story of the scene and how the person fits within the background. Which Fujifilm camera are you using?
It’s always a good day when a Dan Bailey lens review video pops up! Love and own one myself.
It's always a good day when someone posts a comment like this!! Thanks, Scott. Glad you're enjoying your 16mm. What are you shooting these days?
I agree, my Fuji 16/2.8 is a favorite of mine.
Hey Bill, it's definitely becoming a favorite over here, too!!
Hi Dan , super video , definitely gonna add this to my Fuji prime collection !
Thanks for your comment! Yes, it really is a fun little lens, definitely favorite white angle these days. What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
@@DanBaileyPhoto Hi Dan , thanks for your kind reply . I use an X-T4 and go for landscape , street and flowers ! Love the colours and variety recipes provide too
Thanks Dan. These videos have been so helpful in determining my lens choices for my Colorado Trail thru hike next year (July 2024). Peace and happy trails.
Thanks very much for your comment, I'm glad you're enjoying my videos! This 16mm would make for an excellent thru-hike lens indeed! Which Fuji model are you currently using?
@@DanBaileyPhoto I’ve got the XT3. Thinking either the XF 10-24 f/4 WR OIS, XF 16 f2.8 WR and/or Samyang 12mm f/2 Manual Focus for Astro. Tough choices. I have a SLIK 450g like 3.5 foot tripod I may bring if I do Astro. Surprisingly, XT3 with lens is so light, that this mini tripod can even handle the weight in portrait orientation. Gotta love aps-c weight savings. Thanks for your response btw- made my afternoon.
For astrophotography, among those three you listed, I would probably recommend the Samyang 12mm. That has a proven track record with night sky shooters. The Fuji 16mm 2.8 is a great lens, but it's really hard to manually focus a lens in the dark that doesn't have a hard stop at infinity. You really want that feature if you do lots of nighttime shooting. Same with the XF10-24. However, the Fuji 16mm f/1.4 has a focus clutch, which means it does have a hard stop. This would be a good choice, as well, or the XF14mm f/2.8.
Cheers for that Dan, have a great 2022.
Thanks, Iain! You too!!!
Great video and some lovely images to go with it! I have both 16mm lenses but use the 2.8 way more than the 1.4. Superb image quality for such a small lens!
Hi Richard, thanks for your comment. I never had a strong desire to get the 1.4 version, mostly because for the size, weigh and cost, and because it’s a very close focal length to my 14. However, I was intrigued by the 2.8 version as soon as it was announced, and I’m really enjoying it. Sounds like you are, too. What do you like to shoot with it?
Hello! I found your video while were searching information about this lens. I've just bought it for my Fujifilm xt2 and now I'm waiting for delivering it. I had the 16-55mm lens before, so I had an imagination about the angle. I think, it will great for me. I like street, landscapes and so on. Thank you for the review.
Thanks so much for your comment, I'm glad I could help! I'm sure you'll have a ton of fun with the new 16mm f/2.8 when it arrives, it's such a great little lens!
Thanks for this video! I found you while searching for X-T1 content to prepare for my new to me/used Fuji X-T1 and the only lens I could afford to buy - the 16 2.8. It was either this one or the 14 2.8. I’m glad to gave found your channel- new subscriber.
Hi Laura, thanks for your comment. I'm glad you found my channel! Congratulations on your new X-T1; that was such a groundbreaking camera when it was first introduced, and it was the camera that put me over the top and made me switch to Fuji. You should watch my X-T1 retrospective video here: th-cam.com/video/93UjJKzSnr4/w-d-xo.html
Both the 14 and 16 are great lenses, but for the price, size and the weather sealing, the 16 2.8 is hard to beat. You'll have fun with it, I'm sure. What kinds of subjects do you like to shoot?
@@DanBaileyPhoto Actually the video you linked was the first one I saw. What an amazing journey with Fujifilm you’ve had! I’m a beginner photographer so I’m doing mostly family, pets, animal shelter photos and videos, landscapes and mild wildlife. I have a Canon 7D so the X-T1 will make a nice companion to it.
Indeed! You'll find the X-T1 to be an excellent companion to your Canon, but beware... it may quickly grow on your and cause you to fall out of love with your big camera! 😱🤣 Have fun with your new Fuji and let me know if you have any questions about its functions.
Very helpful and clarifying, as I have just got this item, I am looking forward to try it in my XPro 1. Many thanks for such a pleasant interesting video.
Thanks so much for your comment, Jose. Glad you enjoyed this, and yes, the 16 is a really great lens! What kinds of things do you like to shoot with your X-Pro 1?
@@DanBaileyPhoto Hi Dan, basically I m now trying to explore it in street shooting and landscapes as well. I mean exploring, taking into consideration that I have changed this "new" unit, by selling my almost brand new 11 years old Fujifilm X10 that I did not enjoy properly as I did not like it very much.
Sounds like a good approach. Keep up the good work and have fun with your X-Pro camera!
@@DanBaileyPhoto Yes sir, absolutely. Kindest regards.
Just got into the Fuji X series with the X-T3! It rocks! 16mm 2.8 it is for my first Fjui lens. Thanks, Dan!
Hey Gary - Awesome!! The X-T3 and 16 f/2.8 is an awesome combo! I'm sure you're going to have of fun with that setup. What kinds of subjects do you like to shoot?
Hi @@DanBaileyPhoto I'm into landscapes, and just lately, street photography. It's a hobby and maybe later it has to have some ROI 😉
That's always nice when you have some ROI, but then again, doing it purely as a creative passion does take the pressure off. The fun part is that you never know where it might lead.
Thanks Dan for another great video!
Thanks so much, you enjoyed this! Do you have the 16mm, or is it a lens you’ve been looking at getting?
@@DanBaileyPhoto I have the 16-55mm lens. I am curious if the 16mm 2.8 lens is better than the zoom lens?
I don't know. Those Red Badge lenses are really amazing. According to this review, the 16mm 2.8 may be a little big sharper at 16mm than the 16-55, but probably not by much, and the overall versatility of the 16-55 makes this a very usable lens. Of course, the 16 2.8 is so much smaller and lighter. This is the deal maker for me, so you just need to decide what's more important, the small compact form factor, or the versatility of the zoom. What kinds of subjects do you like to shoot? fstoppers.com/originals/comparing-three-fujifilm-16mm-f28-lenses-417489
Thank you Dan! Very helpful review!
Thanks Michaela! Glad it was helpful! What are you shooting these days?
@@DanBaileyPhoto I shoot everything in my surroundings with 35mm 1.4 and 18-55.
I’ll bet you have a lot of fun with that 35 1.4!!
Nice review,thanks
Thanks for watching! I appreciate your comment! Are you a Fuji Shooter?
I have this lens and use it on my X-E3 body. The combination is light and compact and can go anywhere. It is an excellent lens and a bargain. I also love the 23mm f/2.0, which spends even more time on my X-E3 as that is my favorite focal length.
Thanks for your comment, Danny. Yes, the 16 makes for an excellent wide angle on small X-E3 body. That's a great combo, especially when paring with the 35 f/2. What kinds of subjects do you like to shoot?
@@DanBaileyPhoto I've been shooting since the 60's when my dad got me an Instamatic :) I like nature, landscape, street and automotive photography. Learning watch photography currently.
Cool! My dad gave me an Instamatic in the 70's. I've used a couple of them over the years; the one that look like an ice cream sandwich, and the X-35 which looks more like a rangefinder camera. I still have that one sitting on my desk!
Very helpful thanks!
Thanks for the comment, I’m glad you enjoyed this. What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
Hi Dan great content as usual. Yes the 16 f2.8 is a very good lens and I own that too. I like the compactness and I call it the little monster.
Hey Nas, thanks for your comment!! Sounds like we think alike! We both love the 16 2.8!! 👍 Hope you're doing well right now.
@@DanBaileyPhoto I'm doing well Dan. Thanks for asking. Hope all is well on your end too.
Doing well, Nas. Staying away from everyone I know these days! 🤣
My favourite too 😊 (with 35mm f2.0)
If anyone wants to buy a lens for videos; this lens is perfect for it. It Has fast and silent auto focus.
Indeed! I haven’t used the 16 for video yet, (I’ve used the 14 for video) but I film all of my TH-cam videos with the 35 f/2.
The 16/2.8 is my favorite lens! It lives on my camera. In my small bag, I also have the 35/2 and two Laowa lenses: the 9/2.8 and the 65/2.8 2:1 macro, which is super sharp. That set of 4 lenses is nicely spaced with about 2x focal length increments. And it all fits with the XT4 in a 5 liter sling bag!!! But when I hike, I always take the 16/2.8 and usually one of the others depending upon what I expect to shoot or how I’m feeling that day. Right now, I’m toying with the idea to sell the 9/2.8 and get the 10-24mm, but I would definitely keep the 16/2.8 for its tiny size.
Hey Karl, sounds like you've got a great setup with those lenses!! A few really useful focal lengths, that don't take up very much room in your bag. I agree, the 16 f/2.8 is such an ideal lens for hiking. I'm so glad I finally got it! What kinds of subjects do you like to shoot?
@@DanBaileyPhoto Thanks, Dan! I truly enjoy your TH-cam channel! I mostly do a lot of “run-and-gun” landscape. Sounds crazy, I know, but I love my wife despite her impatience. So run and gun it is. We love to hike and explore National Parks, State Parks, coastlines, mountains, deserts, small towns, unknown jewels within big cities, and anywhere that is beautiful. Further, I don’t do traditional street photography, but I do a modified version of that along West Cliff Drive at the coast in Santa Cruz, CA, where we live. It is much more open than a city, so my 55-200mm is perfect for that. I get tons of gorgeous, anonymous shots of quirky locals with stunning backdrops, especially at sunset. It’s a magical place!! I’m blessed to live in such a fantastic spot. I’ve also been building a discrete Ford Transit camper van to further our explorations. BTW, I’ve been shooting the excellent XT1 for seven years, but just finally upgraded to the XT4. OMG!!!! It’s amazing. The IBIS and better focus has rejuvenated my love for my 56/1.2. And now you’ve heard of my entire lens collection!!! 9/2.8, 16/2.8, 35/2, 56/1.2, 65/2.8 macro, and 55-200. I will add the 10-24 next. And then maybe the 50/2. For gear, I love the lenses, but also the Fuji bodies with their “retro”dials. My dad bought me a manual SLR when I graduated middle school in ‘79, and Fuji alone seems to understand my connection to photography. We are really lucky to have Fuji, as well as the freedoms and beauty we enjoy in our lives all around us.
Cool! Thanks for sharing! Yes, the X-T4 is an amazing upgrade to the X-T1. Keep having tons of fun with your Fuji gear and thanks so much for your feedback. I’m glad you’re enjoying my channel! Take care. 👍
Hello Dan, yes wonderful lens' like you said i too used the Nikon Nikkor 24mm f2.8 for years love the focal length. Cheers 👍👍
Micheal, we're like brothers from a similar past!
Me, too! I shot the first photo I ever licensed with that lens on a Nikon F100. Kodak Tri-X 400 pushed to ISO 1200.
I wanted the 16 1.4, but the 16 2.8 was just 250€ used in very good condition. I couldnt pass that offer up and bought it. It's a really fun lens and enjoy this change of field of view. I usually use the 35 1.4 or 50 2 and love them. I need a zoom Lens now and maybe I will get the 16 1.4 one day. Good video, btw :)
Probably a good choice. It's hard to make extra $600 jump to the 1.4 version, when the 2.8 will do just fine for most scenes, and it will weigh a lot less in your bag. I think you'll find that it will compliment your existing setup nicely. 16/35/50 is one of my favorite lens combinations, as well! Thanks so much for your comment. What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
100% agree about the Nikon 24mm non af. My all time favorite when I was shooting film. Great points!
Thanks for your comment! Yes, that old Nikon 24 was such an awesome, workhorse lens! Are you currently a Fuji shooter?
@@DanBaileyPhoto Definitely a Fuji shooter. There is no substitute. X-T2. I've just about had them all. Nothing compares to the modern Fuji or film era Nikons.
Which model are you currently using?
Dan, I've read that the XF 16mm f/2.8 WR does not get the Super EBC coating. Do you happen to know why, and is it a concern?
My lens says "Super EBC", so I highly doubt Fuji slaps that label on the lens but doesnt include that coating
As @venom2k2 indicated, the 16 2.8 is indeed labeled "Super EBC" right on the front of the lens, so yes, it does have the super electron beam coating, which helps reduce ghosting and flare.
thanks for the effort and sharing. as part of a travel lens kit, do you have thoughts on the 16/2.8 vs the 16-80/4? thumbs up.
Hey there, thanks for you comment! I do love the 16 f/2.8. This is my primary wide angle lens that I use and travel with. I haven't used the 16-80 very much. It's a good lens, but I've always preferred fixed lenses in the wide to middle range. The zoom does offer versatility in that you can have two or three main focal length ranges in a single lens, and that can obviously be a huge benefit when traveling or going with a very lightweight and compact setup. Hope that helps. What kinds of scenes/locations do you like to shoot?
I use this lens, its a great instrument, better then many other lenses by Fuji, has very fast AF, very good optical performance, its compact, etc...
Hi Koba - Awesome! What kinds of subjects do you like to shoot with it?
I use it at street, indoors, when I shoot inconspicuously, urban landscapes, if I'm too lazy to yearn for large and heavy lenses. This lens focuses very quickly on all Fujifilm cameras including old cameras, the photographer does not look professional with it, so people around or security guards of various departments almost never pay attention to me, it is weatherproof, in addition , one of my cameras - X-H1 - has IBIS, and this lens can shoot at a shutter speed of 1/8 sec, then I can use it for night shots. And, I bought it in 98-99 condition for 220 USD...
Is the X Series Unlimited manual updated for all cameras?
Yes, my X Series guide has been updated to cover all models up through the new 5th gen cameras, including X-T5, X-H2 and X-H2S. What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
Excellent video Dan. I have the 23 1.4, which I use a lot as it = 35 mm in 35 SLR focal length.
Sure, if you want the Rolex, those can go for the 16 1.4, however, I just do not need the speed for landscape-type work, I tend to shoot wider, so the 2.8, at the price point is just very hard to go past. As with watches, a Rolex will not really keep any better time than my car clock! Samee with the 16 2.8 v 16 1.4. Good luck to those who can afford it.
Hi Robert, I also have the 23 1.4. For those times when I do want that particular focal length, I've got it nailed with this lens. For most of my other sooting, though, I do usually prefer to go a little bit wider. That's when the 16 really comes in handy. And yes, the 2.8 version is hard to beat!
Hi Dan. I appreciate your expertise and enjoy your positive attitude and enthusiasm. I have the 15-45mm which I bought as a kit lens for an extra $50 when I purchased my X-T30. The cost was a no brainer to me, knowing it may end up later as a 'backup' to a better lens. I'm thinking it may be the time. Having used the 15-45 for over a year, I think it's underrated when used as a wide angle lens. I understand all of the build and operating criticisms of the lens, but the photos at the wider end of the lens (I use it primarily for it's wide end) come out sharp and look fine to my eyes. I have never used the 16 2.8. I like primes, I like the focal length, it's clearly a more solid lens, weather resistant, etc. but I wonder if I'd see any improved performance in the final result over the 15-45. I suppose my decision to spend $399 boils down to preference and handling (clearly to me the 16 2.8 will a better experience), but I'd like to hear your thoughts on the two. PS My photography 'style' is wide to mid, small light lenses and cameras for travel and general walk-around. I also have the excellent 35 1.4, the 55-200 (rarely used or carried other than when I know it will be needed for its telephoto range), and my still loved and carried X100T. Thanks.
Scott, as you've noticed, the Fuji 15-45 is a surprisingly good lens with regards to image quality, especially at the wide range of the zoom. For the most part, the glass inside that lens is very good. It's not like Fuji has separate "good glass" and "ok glass" factories. You're right, most of the difference in price boils down to the build and design features, which were maximized to make the lens extremely lightweight and inexpensive for pairing with the X-A series cameras.
There will be obvious build differences between this lens and the 16mm f/2.8, and you will see a slight optical difference that will result from these. The main difference is that the 16mm has 9 aperture blades, compared to 7 blades on the 15-45. This will translate to better looking bokeh and a more pleasing look on out-of-focus background subjects. Other than that, both lenses have ED and aspherical elements and Super EBC coating, so they'll both perform extremely well in a variety of situations.
The 15-45 is a real sleeper in the line, and if you can get past the funky design and mechanics, then it's a great little lens. The kicker will be if you want a more traditional style lens that has more durable construction and weather sealing. As you say, preference, handling characteristics and weather sealing. I'd recommend trying one out in a store and seeing what you think. Hope that helps.
@@DanBaileyPhoto Thanks for the comprehensive reply. As an afterthought, I 'd be happiest if Fujifilm upgraded the 15-45 into a metal housing, scrapped the power zoom, and added an aperture ring.
That would be nice, but of course, you'd be looking at a heavier, more expensive lens, right? 🤣
Hi Dan!
Greetings from Italy :)
I reallly appreciate your videos, and now I have a question for you.
I own a Fuji X-T3, combined with XF35mm F2, and I am now considering a wide angle. I have the opportunity of buying a 16 f2.8 or a 14 f2.8 almost at the same price.
What Is your suggestion between the two?
Thank you!
Hey there!!! That's a tough decision. Both are fantastic lenses and I really like both of them. The 16mm f/2.8 is weather-sealed and a bit more compact for travel, so that's a hard one to beat. I do love the 14mm f/2.8, but since getting the 16mm, I don't use it as often, simply because the 16 is a bit smaller. However, for night/astro photography, the 14 is definitely the better choice, because it has a hard stop on the focus ring at infinity, which makes it WAY easier to focus in the dark. Hope that helps. What kinds of subjects do you like to shoot?
It's my favorite Fuji lens!😀
Cool! What do you like to shoot with it?
@@DanBaileyPhoto a lot of things; people, landscapes, my grandchildren , seascapes, buildings... This lens can be used in so many situations. And it is so portable!
Indeed!! So versatile and so compact!! ⭐️😀
i want to buy a wideangle for my xt1, and i'm undecided between this and the 14mm 2.8
Hey Antonio. That's a tough choice. They're both awesome. What other lenses do you already have and what do you like to shoot?
@@DanBaileyPhoto i have the xf18-55, xf55-200 and xf27mm.
I like to do various genres, nature landscape, cityscape, night photo, still life, and much more.
That's a decent setup. Two zooms to cover the full range, and then a fast, mid-range prime. I think that's an excellent way to go. It's always good to have at least one fast prime, and the 27mm is a great, tiny little lens. Do you have the weather sealed 27, or the original?
@@DanBaileyPhoto I have the original 27mm and I love it. super compact super light and with excellent image quality. if I really have to find a fault, I would have preferred a minimum distance of closer focus, but hey, you can't always have everything 😄😄
Indeed. I’ve always been impressed with the 27, it’s incredibly sharp, and it has very quick autofocus. Plus it’s just so tiny!!
Hi Dan, Now that SIGMA has a 16mm 1.4 lens are you going to try it?
Hey Joe, not sure. I did see that Sigma announced their upcoming Fuji mount lenses. I don't usually try every X Mount lens that gets released, but I'd certainly be open to the idea. Just by the looks of it, though, the Sigma 16 is a little bigger than would I would typically want for an X Series lens, but you never know. I've been impressed by what I've seen from them during the past few years, especially in their ART line. Is this a lens that interests you?
@@DanBaileyPhoto It could possibly interest me. Fuji's 16 mm prime has an aperture ring and Sigma does not. Sigma is about $100 more for their 1.4 over Fuji's 2.8. I have been reading Sigma's image quality is better. However, I am just a hobbyist so I don't know if it will be worth paying $100 more. By the way, your X-series unlimited book is fantastic. Learning so much about my xt-3.
Thanks for buying my Fuji ebook, I'm glad you're finding it to be such a helpful resource. Regarding the Sigma, as I said, I've been impressed by their Art line lenses, and while I haven't seen any direction comparisons, I'm sure it will produce great looking imagery. Most modern lenses do, so it really becomes a matter of which form factor you prefer in a lens, or for that matter, a camera.
Thanks Dan for a great video again 😄👍. I am thinking of buying a 16 mm prime. Before seeing this video I was thinking of the 1.4. Want to use it indoor with low light. But now I am not so sure anymore ☺️. Could go for the 2.8 and raise the ISO if needed? Its cheaper and I use the money on the 100-400 mm 😉
Yes, absolutely. With the excellent higher ISO performance of the Fuji cameras and a 2.8 wide angle lens like the 16mm, I don't think you'll feel very inhabited in lower light conditions, and you'll still get great results. By comparison, the 16 1.4 is certainly a great lens, but it's quite a bit heavier and more expensive, and as you said, you could always put the difference towards a 100-400. Combining that with long zoom with the 16 2.8, would give you a truly excellent, pro-quality combination for shooting a wide range of subjects!!
what is the main difference between this and the 18mm f2 thanks for the feedback
Hey Chuck. The 18 is an older design, and Fuji has made a lot of advancements since then with regard to lens design. The 18 is a fun little lens and incredibly compact, but the 16 has better edge to edge sharpness, faster, snappier autofocus, and it’s weather sealed. Plus, I like that it’s wider, and it costs $200 less than the 18. I’ve enjoyed using the 18 in the past, but I’ll choose the 16 over the 18 any day.
@@DanBaileyPhoto thanks Dan as always for your response. Planning a trip and looking for something to go with my 35 f2
Dan, great video. I continue to see, as I did in your photos, images taken with the 16mm 2.8 that just have some awesome ability to "pop", almost 3D like. Micro contrast? Is that the reason? Look at your image of the guy in yellow by the plane. That's what I mean. It's something special this lens seems to be able to render. Or am I imagining it?
Bill, thanks for your comment. The yellow plane guy is actually an older picture, shot with a different lens, just to illustrate how well wide angle lenses can be used for environmental portraits. That was was shot with flash and processed a little bit. All the other shots (aside from the initial collage) are from the new 16 2.8, through.
To my eyes, the picture that best illustrates the kind of amazing 3D quality that this lens has is the lead-off orange poppy/green grass shot. That's a straight JPEG, and it just zings out of the frame. Definitely has that right, vibrant "Fuji" look.
@@DanBaileyPhoto Thanks Dan. I'll check it out again. I keep seeing that effect in images from Fuji shooters who talk about that lens. I don't see comments about it, but my eyes just see something in a few of the images from that lens that I haven't seen in the 1.4. Appreciate the quick feedback!
Bill, there's definitely something special about the ways that the X Series cameras and lenses render subjects and reproduce colors. After all, color and high quality lenses are their legacy, which turns 88 years old today!
I shoot video and own the 16mm f1.4. The low light performance is a big deal for me but I can definitely see the appeal of the lighter, cheaper f2.8.
That faster 1.4 aperture definitely comes in handy when you need it, but there are a lot of times when a smaller, lighter, more compact lens really fits the bill! What Fuji do you use and what kinds of subjects do you like to shoot with your 16?
@@DanBaileyPhoto I use the XT-4 and I shoot cinematic multiday hiking films.
Cool, I'll check out your TH-cam channel!
@@DanBaileyPhoto I appreciate it!
Dan, u r really the champion of Fujicrons. Do u feel any itch to get the 23F2 to complete the collection? 😄 I really enjoy 16F2.8. Super light on my XT4. I occasionally wish I had the 1.4 for the bokeh n low light, but 2.8 is small and light that makes u wanna carry and shoot more. Cheers
Thanks, Bun. No, not really. I find that for most scenes that I shoot, between the 14/16, 35 and 50, I feel that I'm covered in the wide to middle range. I actually have the 23 f/1.4 as well, so if I do really want that focal length, I've got the option.
I'm on the fence, 14mm f2.8 or the 16 f2.8, I really can't make up my mind the 14mm has the same hood (1 hood in bag for both) and filter size as my 18-55 zoom and then my viltrox 85mm, job done
Hi Ashton, that's a tough one. As I mentioned, I don't have a bad thing to say about the 14, it's an absolutely amazing lens. It's a little bit bigger than the 16, but it does offer a gorgeous view angle when you look through it. I would say that since you already have the 18-55, then go for the 14 since it has a bigger view angle difference than the 18-55. Hope that helps. What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
@@DanBaileyPhoto hi Dan i got an xt3 and an x100f, TRY (haha) to photograph my daughter with the horses, wide comes in handy in the stables, my 2 little lurchers, take my camera on country walks, architecture anything really, just love making pictures, thanks for replying. Al good advice about the 14MM difference I'll go with that. Thanks
The X-T3 and X100 makes for a very fun and capable setup. I love using the two different bodies, sometimes separate and sometimes together.
I wonder how this lens compares to the new 18mm f1.4, the rumors are the 18mm has enough resolution for the new 40mp apsc fuji sensor. I'm waiting to see if fuji actually releases an XH2 or XT5 with 40mp. It wouldn't be good if the older lenses don't have enough resolution for 40mp. I'm a landscape guy and love my XT3. I'm looking at the GFX 50sII and waiting to see if this 40mp camera will be a reality.
Hey Keith, that new 18mm f/1.4 looks like a fantastic lens, with outstanding resolution and image quality. It's definitely bigger and heavier than the 16 2.8. There's quite a bit more glass inside there. To compare, the 18 f/1.4 is 13 oz, the barrel is almost twice the width, and it takes a filter size of 62mm, whereas the 16 f/2.8 has a 49mm filer ring.
With regards to whether the older lenses will be able to resolve on a higher MP sensor, I have read various things on this. I know that the original XF lenses were designed with higher MP sensors in mind, even though they didn't exist at the time. Knowing the history and quality of Fuji glass, my guess is they would make lenses that would remain capable, even as the system evolved.
I haven't really paid attention the rumors, so we'll see what the future brings! For now I'll just keep having fun with my existing cameras and lenses and worry about that later, if the issue does arise.
Thanks Dan, I am hoping the older lenses will be ok. I love my 100-400mm. I would love a 40mp sensor for the resolution. I don't like the weight of medium format so I'm in stand by mode.
Keith, I would have full confidence that the Fuji pro-quality "red badge" lenses, like the 100-400 will indeed continue to perform well, even as the number of pixels continue to rise in the future.
Good to know. Thanks Dan.
You're welcome!!
I am thinking I might trade in my Fuji 10-24 for this lens after watching this video. It's a great lens but I find I don't use it that much and it is bulky to carry. I also have the 18-55 for a zoom in that range. Is the image quality just as good as the 10-24? I have heard the 16mm is one of the best lenses Fuji makes. Responses from anyone would be helpful.
Robert, I don’t have the 10-24, so I can’t compare side by side, but yes, the 16 has extremely good image quality. The 10-24 is a very good lens, but personally, I’d much rather have a small prime in the wide angle range than a larger, heavier zoom. Yes, if you need extra wide, the 10-24 has it, but for me, I just prefer a smaller lens, and I think for most subjects, the 16 focal length is wide enough and more useful in a wider range of scenes. So, with that in mind. Trading the 10-24 for the 16 might not be a bad option.
O Dan, here you go getting me in to trouble again. :) Trying to focus on Inc. Taxes and you are waving "Buy Me" flags in front of me. I am, however thinking of selling a couple of my lens that I have rarely ever used in the field. So really, this is really just good planning!! Going to practice that pitch!! Thanks Dan.
Hi Merle, Thanks for your comment! Yes, perhaps paring down some of the lenses you don't use as often might allow you to pick up this fun little gem!!
I have both the 16mm f/1.4 and the f/2.8. The faster lens is every bit as good as the hype around it, a fantastic optic.
The f/2.8 lens is on my camera when I need 16mm about 80% of the time. Its smaller, lighter and fast to focus. If I'm in good light and know that I'll be shooting in the f/4 to f/11 range, then I don't feel that I give up much by forgoing the faster lens.
To be sure, when you know that you will need f/1.4, there is no substitute. If you can, own both.
Incidentally, many reviews say the slower lens is a bit wider than the marked 16mm, maybe 15mm. I've never did a side by side comparison.
Hi Albert - I agree, the 16 1.4 is an amazing lens. A full-on pro-quality optic in every way. It's just bigger and heavier than I prefer for that kind of focal length. I had that with my old Nikon 14 2.8, and I'm through with super heavy primes, which is why I love the small Fuji primes so much.
One area where the 16 1.4 excels is shooting at night, for things like aurora and astro photography. The clutch focus makes it so much easier to focus in the dark, and that's when those extra stops make all the difference. But yes, for most other subjects, the 2.8 version will get you by with flying colors.
Regarding the "actual" focal length, I hadn't heard that, and I haven't done any tests either. Who knows...? Anyway, thanks for your comment. What kinds of subjects are you shooting these days?
@@DanBaileyPhoto I too came up on Nikon gear and the 24mm f/2.8 AI-s was in my kit always. I remember the late, great Galen Rowell said in an article that he used the 24mm most often, and he said he could survive with just a 24mm and 85mm if he had to.
The only reason that I own the 16mm f/1.4 is that it was the only 16mm when I went full-Fuji, and because of my decades of Nikon shooting, I knew I had to have the 24mm equivalent. The 2.8 came out and at $400, I had to give it a go.
Indeed. I was a student of Galen Rowell as well, and so I was heavily influenced by his lens choices, including my own love for the 24 and 85.
@@albertsmith9315 Hi. We have the same thought--The 16/1.4 is my only Fuji 1.4 lens I have BUT I'm thinking of getting rid of it for two prime lenses -- The 16/2.8 and the 27/2.8ii. I use the 16/1.4 often when I'm documenting my family and travels. But, like Mr. Bailey, I'm finding it bulky. Yet, I'm hesitant in getting rid of it because inside malls, often you need more light. 2.8 may not cut it. Your thoughts, Mr. Smith? Thank you.
@@nathanielngosy When I was shooting film, f/2.8 could be a deal breaker. Film did not have the quality after ISO 400 that any modern digital camera today has even up to ISO 3200. I shoot at high ISO without much thought these days.
I keep my 16mm f/1.4 for its rendering, its superior close focusing potential and for the manual focus clutch that has a true DOF scale for hyper and zone focusing. If I can tolerate the size and weight, this lens it unbeatable.
For casual outings, the f/ 2.8 version if fine. I will always have both.
The 16mm 2.8 Fujinon is one of the cutest lenses ever, esp w/lens hood! However... it's nowhere near the IQ of the 14mm, more like the 18mm f2, which is...
And I just find the 24mm equivalent perspective such an "in between" focal length, doesn't have the sweeping goodness of a 20/21mm e, more like an overly stretched out 28mm e.
The new 18mm 1.4 has phenomenal IQ- it's just Too Big, and Too Expensive! Wish they had just upgraded the f2, or made a 1.8 with a 58mm diameter- I would presently, joyfully own
either of the latter two, instead of begrudgingly using the f2, or using the much better 18mm on the Ricoh GR.
Hi Stan, thanks for your comment. I agree, the 16 2.8 is indeed a darling little lens!! 😍 It definitely has better performance than the 18mm f/2, but you're right, not near as good as the excellent 14mm. And I'm with you, the new 18 1.4 looks incredible, but too big and heavy for my style. An upgraded 18 f/2 would be nice, but between the 16 and 14, I'm pretty much set, and at some point you just start to have too much redundancy in your kit, and that only bogs you down. With those two lens, I hardly use my 18 anymore. What kinds of subjects do you like to shoot?
@@DanBaileyPhoto Rather than describe: www dot stanbanos dot net.
Cool. Will have a look. 👍
No distorsion at the edges??? Are you serious?
Samuel, as with many modern lenses, the optics are not distortion free, but if you shoot Jpeg, then the camera’s internal processor will apply corrections that will eliminate nearly all of it. Same happens if you shout RAW and apply the correct lens profile. So, effectively, your final images will show a minimal amount of distortion.
@@DanBaileyPhoto yes, but you loose some angle of view, and the edges will be softer
Perhaps a tiny bit, but today’s lenses and lens correction profiles do an amazing job. Also, perfect, 100% sharpness alone isn’t the only thing that defines the character and feel of a lens. A lot of older, and very classic lenses had slight imperfections, but the overall character of how they portrayed subject matter far outweighed that fact. It’s the same with just about any kind of artistic tool, because ultimately, art and creativity isn’t about protection, it’s about drawing the viewer/listener in and engaging them with compelling content and message.
@@DanBaileyPhoto i own this 16 f2.8 but I'm not really soddisfated, yes it's a good lens with a good optical performance, really lighter, not expensive and really small but in my opinion got to much distorsion, it's a little bit softer at the edges and got no to much character. I'm thinking about switching to xf14mm
That wouldn’t be a bad choice. I do love the 16 2.8, but ultimately the 14 has higher quality optics. You’ll find that there’s definitely less distortion in that lens.
Great video 👌🤩 I too love the 16mm focal length as the sweet spot!! I’ve just sold my 16mm 1.4 and I’m going to buy the 16mm f2.8 and 35mm f2 ,50mm f2 and together with my 90mm is my complete travel kit too
Sweet spot indeed!!! I agree, that combo makes for an incredibly capable and lightweight travel photography kit!! Have fun with it!! What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
@@DanBaileyPhoto I’m using a variety of Fuji x series’s cameras like the xt4,xh1,xt2 and xe3 together with my gfx 50r camera plus I’ve got nearly every Fuji lens and I mostly like landscape photography and street photography and I love watching your videos 👌
Sound like you've got it all covered!! Thanks for your feedback, glad you're enjoying my channel!
@@Pixelpeeps-69 Hi. I have the 16/1.4 but thinking of selling it for a 16/2.8 and, perhaps, a 27/2.8ii for their compact sizes. But curiously, why did you sell your 16/1.4?
@@nathanielngosy 18mm 1.4 is sharper and a more versatile focal length than the 16mm 1.4 but I believe as a general purpose lens the 16mm 2.8 is all one needs
But I have 16-55/2.8 and it's by far the best lense Im having, sitting on Fuji 90% of time.
Then it sounds like you’re all set, Serge! If you love your lens, that’s all that matters. 👍