Interview with perfume connoisseur Renaud Salmon on smell

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 14

  • @youdoyou888
    @youdoyou888 ปีที่แล้ว

    So glad a search for Deleuze led me to your channel, and found this video. I started my TH-cam frag channel wanting to treat perfume as art, but have since come to a tentative conclusion that perfumery can’t- at least at the moment -be fine art, as opposed to the decorative art that it has traditionally been considered as. It can’t be art because 1) for something to be art, there must be an artist who will posit a piece as such, and (that is the case since Impressionism) and 2) as Salmon suggested, perfumes are produced by corporations. Art as it has been recognized either eradicates or hides its interest in money; while perfumes are, well, products. A commodity. (I should add that that doesn’t make it a lesser thing.)
    Discussing things like this could be so tedious because most people can’t regard fragrances beyond the terms imposed by the hobbyism of their interest. So that you’d get people saying “oh but perfume X & Y are art to me”, missing the point of questioning entirely.

  • @KazimirKharza
    @KazimirKharza ปีที่แล้ว

    Very fascinating topic, I think smell is something that is very underdiscussed

  • @ChristianMeinke
    @ChristianMeinke 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Always love when art meets philosophy - enjoyed the exploration of the aesthetics of scent and the ways we interact non-linguisticly with others and the environment

  • @BillyMcBride
    @BillyMcBride 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I wonder if you can learn things by smell. I think the brain can be trained to do this. I am thinking of braille, which we use to read by touch. Can we learn to read by smell if somebody could teach us fragrances. They would have to flow somehow in a direction with a sequence. Maybe that's why Kant had a problem with it, that it cannot be organized...yet. So fragrances now seem more like an entertainment art, but can we learn from them too, other than be entertained by them? Thank you three for another great episode!

    • @youdoyou888
      @youdoyou888 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Your questions taken as points make sense to me. I’ve been thinking that perfume (as opposed to odors/scents-let’s say, “olfactory data” ) is a form of language itself, but a language that does not require the unidirectionality of time, and one that (therefore?) can convey information other than the prosaic kind. But I may have misinterpreted what you meant exactly by the word “read”.

  • @ChadLangford-US
    @ChadLangford-US 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great series! Thanks for doing these interviews. I work in machine learning and am now trying to imagine how I could build a model that describes scents based on the chemical composition, or the other way around. Very interesting!

  • @marhoc6040
    @marhoc6040 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Perfume of brutalism already exists: it's Beton Brut by Atelier Oblique. Thank you guys for excellent content here.

  • @jamrollz
    @jamrollz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Did not expect my philosophy interest to overlap with perfume. Shoutout to fragcom and the wackpack

    • @zaynemiller1311
      @zaynemiller1311 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I was thinking the same thing lmaoo

    • @OverthinkPodcastPhilosophy
      @OverthinkPodcastPhilosophy  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@zaynemiller1311 this is David (from the video) and I now have an interest in perfume, even though I am chemo-sensitive and cannot even wear it! Really interesting stuff!!

    • @zaynemiller1311
      @zaynemiller1311 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@OverthinkPodcastPhilosophy love to welcome another appreciator to the fragrance game, even if afar. Your guys’ discussion of scent only furthered my interest in perfume and I’m looking forward to what other content you’ve got cooking up for the sense of smell.

    • @kungfooshoo
      @kungfooshoo 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Frag community represent!!!

  • @DjTahoun
    @DjTahoun 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    🌺🌸🌷😇🌷🌸🌺

  • @jonathonlee9081
    @jonathonlee9081 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Over talk podcast. !! 12:18 Shorten ur questions , hear more from subject.
    ESP as he’s quite in depth and sententious
    And not native English speaker… and u have limited time with him