Log odds interpretation of logistic regression

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 32

  • @minhha8981
    @minhha8981 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    A 5 mins lecture >>>>>> An 1 hour and a half in class lecture. Mind blowing. Thank you.

  • @pedrocolangelo5844
    @pedrocolangelo5844 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ben Lambert certainly has one of the best TH-cam channels ever

  • @quocanhhbui8271
    @quocanhhbui8271 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Omg just the right explanation im looking for. My professor introduced everything out of thin air and it was hard to put pieces together even though I have some backgrounds on logistic regression.

  • @prithviprakash1110
    @prithviprakash1110 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great explanation there. Can't believe this was posted way back in 2013. Still relevant nearly 10 years later!

  • @zgbjnnw9306
    @zgbjnnw9306 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent explanation! Always come to your channel when I got confused in class! Thank you so much : )

  • @flashguy234
    @flashguy234 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Cheers Ben, this cleared up my understanding wonderfully!

  • @jorgepriegomoreno3224
    @jorgepriegomoreno3224 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can't stress enough how gratefoul I'm woth you kind Sir, my college degree in economics will be dedicated to you

  • @Azam_Pakistan
    @Azam_Pakistan 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Very nice. Please raise the audio volume, its very difficult to follow on my laptop.

  • @rodrigomorales5841
    @rodrigomorales5841 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So to make sure; one can say that log of the odds is equivalent to the dot product (wT dot X) which is where we get our linear combination?

  • @FlyingSavannahs
    @FlyingSavannahs 11 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks simple videos to understand. Helps with many basic concepts....sometimes requiring review. hope to see more. Taking Categorical Data Analysis in the Spring....Doctoral level and I am not a Biostats major in Public Health....I am Epi. Looking forward to watching all to help review basic concepts I may have let go of.

    • @SpartacanUsuals
      @SpartacanUsuals  11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi, many thanks for your message and kind words. If you are willing it would be great to see your syllabus; this would allow me to add these videos to the list. Best, Ben

  • @kylevietti8700
    @kylevietti8700 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for showing but when doing 1-p. When you say the num and denim simplifying to one (you circled in purple) isn’t it just the number values of e^betas positive and negative values equaling zero then leaving you with 1/1+e^betas.

  • @anooshiravanrazmavar9814
    @anooshiravanrazmavar9814 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you very much professor Lambert that was very helpful.

  • @vimalkumar2992
    @vimalkumar2992 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your video is 'To the point'

  • @kenjiyamazaki8802
    @kenjiyamazaki8802 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Is this about log of odds, not log of odds ratio? I believe odds is different from odds ratio.

    • @MAHANTING
      @MAHANTING 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      they are same i think

    • @woodpeckersonfirs
      @woodpeckersonfirs 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      No. Logit is log odds. Odds ratio is a ratio of odds

  • @zgbjnnw9306
    @zgbjnnw9306 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is the logistic regression part of GLM? Do you have videos explaining other GLM models in which the dependent variable follows other non-normal distributions, such as Gamma, poisson, negative binomial? Thank you!

    • @NONAME_G_R_I_D_
      @NONAME_G_R_I_D_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      th-cam.com/video/J4zNmGqttVo/w-d-xo.html

  • @RahamadhBasha
    @RahamadhBasha ปีที่แล้ว

    How to explain about linear regression and linear regression in interviewer frequently asking this questions could you make the video

  • @yadavsanderamniwas
    @yadavsanderamniwas 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    this is not correct definition of odds ratio. p/1-p is odds, not odds ratio.
    odds ratio is altogether a different thing than odds. When you have a categorical predictor variable X and target variable Y, odds ratio is the ratio of odds .
    odds ratio=(odds of Y when X=1)/ (odds of Y when X=0)
    Please research and correct me if I am wrong.

    • @lastua8562
      @lastua8562 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I am not sure I understand this correctly, specifically why your X is binary which is not necessary in Logit. Could you please review your comment and elaborate, if accurate?

  • @FlyingSavannahs
    @FlyingSavannahs 11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Also, are you ever available for questions? Answered by video of course. In the U.S.. we have language barriers unless one is of Asian or Indian descent.

    • @SpartacanUsuals
      @SpartacanUsuals  11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi, yes I am. I am also looking into getting my videos transcribed to help people with non-native English to understand the videos better. Many thanks, Ben

  • @kumaraswamy7848
    @kumaraswamy7848 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    how can we find beta0,beta1 values

    • @selfmadev85
      @selfmadev85 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Using maximum likelihood

  • @captainalan
    @captainalan 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    this was very helpful; thanks!

  • @YouUndeground
    @YouUndeground 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you!

  • @bathanthegazy6083
    @bathanthegazy6083 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you

  • @smakarevich
    @smakarevich 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice!

  • @TheJourneyFootballVideos
    @TheJourneyFootballVideos 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks :)

  • @Passang1423
    @Passang1423 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    👍