@@Crappy7there is a tiny bit of cgi in the movie, for example the electricity from the taser is cgi. It’s not super noticeable in most scenes, except for the once scene where Mike tases the water on the stage
Interestingly this video kinda made me realise one of the reasons Afton might have made the springlock suits: Immersion We know that even the oldest suits had at least decent facial movements (arguably beyond what was being done irl at the earliest points of the timeline), well one of the problems with normal fabric suits for performers would be the lack of those movements so William needed a solution to keep the movements while still allowing actors to use the suits. Since he'd already made the movements work with the animatronics he decided to just retrofit animatronics into suits, giving birth to the springlocks. Now all of this ignores the fact he could have made a normal suit with just facial motors, but it's an interesting explanation for a very stupid idea
In the novel _Five Nights at Freddy's: the Silver Eyes_ (and the comic book adaptation) there's a scene where William Afton operates a control panel filled with buttons which each perform a tiny individual movement for one animatronic, and uses it to make them dance to impress a group of teenagers-keep in mind he was pretending to be a harmless night watchman named Dave in this instance-which indicates that the in-universe characters probably operate closer to the puppets made by Jim Henson's Creature Shop than they do to actual animatronics like you'd see at Chuck E. Cheese.
i know they designed those suits to actually be safe for whoever is wearing them, but based on the games this movie is about i still would not want to be inside one of those
I’ve seen a lot of theories for why Afton decided to go for the springlock suits, but have we considered: Afton loves murder. It’s entirely possible he enjoyed when the locks would fail and skewer some hapless employee.
@@MephilesGaming1983 Well, assuming his love of violence was pathological, he could have had a sadistic streak for a long time before ever killing that first child
I mean he was well aware that the animatronics were dangerous towards the staff since the late 80s and he still kept them. He could have got rid of them and get new ones but he didn't. He chose to put people's lives in danger and getting them killed for his own pleasure. It puts a lot meaning behind what William said to them "I made you"
The common explanation is he’s a genius inventor who’s also a total idiot who was really obsessed with animatronics that could move around on there own and spring locks was the first idea him and Henry came up with It’s also just an insane person who abuses his kids so probably doesn’t have a sense of morality
You know I find it ironic that the jim Henson company made the animatronics in the movie because originally when the game first came out I thought it was a robotic version of the muppets and that freddy was fozzie bear they look uncannily similar
Something tells me that one day this intro will be one of the most famous ones theres just something about it that captures the nostalgic feeling of old intros like the game theory one
I just saw Dawko's behind the scenes video of the on-set meet and greet with the animatronics, and the "face" Freddy appears to either start walking or take one large step. I was hoping you would know if any info had come out about their capabilities on that level. Foxy is shown on a crane rig, but for the meet and greet the 3 were not obviously craned or otherwise secondarily supported. They do show the stunt suits in the video too, so I'm sure they're not walking around great by any means. But even some advancement on that front would be super interesting. Upon further review, the 3 suitable animatronics are the suit versions. The extent of the puppet head's capabilities is very impressive though, and the in-suit actors and puppeteers do a great job of making it look really incredibly seamless and maintaining a proper 'stance' outside of movements. I was lead astray by a shot from the back that I didn't realize was actually a different time they were filming where they clearly are the not-able-to-be-human shoulder joints/endo bits. What I get for clicking through his video instead of just knuckling down and pretending to have an attention span, lol. Yours I watched and enjoyed, so props to the chef c:
What I find funny with his comments about springlock suits is that even in-universe not only was it an dumb idea, but some people also said it was stupid like movie Vanessa
The Reason Why Foxy Was Hard To Control Is Because The Foxy Was To Thin And The Thing on his back is a puppet rig to help him walk because no one cant be in foxy,btw
counterpoint on your vindication rant about the springlock suits if they're supposed to be a cost-cutting measure, then arguing that the expensive premium workshop who built many custom models for different scenes didnt do the cheap but unsafe cost cutting measure is quite goofy (not saying they make much irl sense regardless, just that it's not an argument you can make)
I’d love to see a video on your thoughts on how the Torture Freddy device worked, both in the film on set and in universe! ( )__( ) 🔴 🔴 ⚙️⚙️⚙️⚙️ ⚙️⚙️⚙️
My headcannon is its part of the mechanism that instead of holding animatronic parts back, is designed to hold the suit on the user, basically they clap down on the users torso(not hard obviously)to hold the suit on their body, so it doesn't wobble while they move. My reasoning is because it's better for stability than strap harnesses, makes them easier to get in and out of, during the heyday they where safe but with their age showing they have became unstable and are prone to snapping their locking mechanism(on the back of the ribs, the upper parts are based apon gears that lead back)which ofc causes the harness system to snap back into its "default" setting which ofc causes a springlocking.
It’s genuinely refreshing to see practical effects in a movie after so long.
Real is best. I want dragons!
Yeah its been so long…
@wanderfilho5443 since I've seen my son
@@melvinborrayo2723Lost to this monster
Its been so long, since last ive seen puppets lost to this monster, to the Computer Behind the Modern .. (ef-fects). (epic beat drop here)
That's why there's no foxy running scenes. They cut away conveniently. It's not CGI
That's why I kinda wish there would've been a little bit of CGI but only when it's needed, like for foxy running.
@@Crappy7there is a tiny bit of cgi in the movie, for example the electricity from the taser is cgi. It’s not super noticeable in most scenes, except for the once scene where Mike tases the water on the stage
@@Vinesus I think the cupcake flying is CGI.
@@Crappy7yeah me too. That one scene where the cupcake chomps afton
Interestingly this video kinda made me realise one of the reasons Afton might have made the springlock suits: Immersion
We know that even the oldest suits had at least decent facial movements (arguably beyond what was being done irl at the earliest points of the timeline), well one of the problems with normal fabric suits for performers would be the lack of those movements so William needed a solution to keep the movements while still allowing actors to use the suits. Since he'd already made the movements work with the animatronics he decided to just retrofit animatronics into suits, giving birth to the springlocks.
Now all of this ignores the fact he could have made a normal suit with just facial motors, but it's an interesting explanation for a very stupid idea
If he had the tech, Afton probably would just done the same thing that Jim Henson did with the animatronic suits in this movie.
9:28 There's an endoskeleton that goes inside one of the FNaF characters in the background! You can recognize it by its ball joints and structure.
In the novel _Five Nights at Freddy's: the Silver Eyes_ (and the comic book adaptation) there's a scene where William Afton operates a control panel filled with buttons which each perform a tiny individual movement for one animatronic, and uses it to make them dance to impress a group of teenagers-keep in mind he was pretending to be a harmless night watchman named Dave in this instance-which indicates that the in-universe characters probably operate closer to the puppets made by Jim Henson's Creature Shop than they do to actual animatronics like you'd see at Chuck E. Cheese.
I'm pretty sure it says that's just where the shows are programmed and afton just entered an activation code or something
@@wolfietronic356 That would make more sense I suppose, since they are shown performing automatically in the movie.
i know they designed those suits to actually be safe for whoever is wearing them, but based on the games this movie is about i still would not want to be inside one of those
I’ve seen a lot of theories for why Afton decided to go for the springlock suits, but have we considered:
Afton loves murder. It’s entirely possible he enjoyed when the locks would fail and skewer some hapless employee.
Well the problem is that he made the springlock suits before even killing anyone.
@@MephilesGaming1983 Well, assuming his love of violence was pathological, he could have had a sadistic streak for a long time before ever killing that first child
I mean he was well aware that the animatronics were dangerous towards the staff since the late 80s and he still kept them.
He could have got rid of them and get new ones but he didn't. He chose to put people's lives in danger and getting them killed for his own pleasure.
It puts a lot meaning behind what William said to them "I made you"
The common explanation is he’s a genius inventor who’s also a total idiot who was really obsessed with animatronics that could move around on there own and spring locks was the first idea him and Henry came up with
It’s also just an insane person who abuses his kids so probably doesn’t have a sense of morality
Probably just cause of the average explanation
Easy comparability for both endoskeleton and humans to wear
You know I find it ironic that the jim Henson company made the animatronics in the movie because originally when the game first came out I thought it was a robotic version of the muppets and that freddy was fozzie bear they look uncannily similar
Something tells me that one day this intro will be one of the most famous ones theres just something about it that captures the nostalgic feeling of old intros like the game theory one
really nice video, this is what i searched for!! I was really wondering how they made that work, especially with Foxy. Thanks :D
I honestly love that matpat intoduced me to this channel
I just saw Dawko's behind the scenes video of the on-set meet and greet with the animatronics, and the "face" Freddy appears to either start walking or take one large step. I was hoping you would know if any info had come out about their capabilities on that level. Foxy is shown on a crane rig, but for the meet and greet the 3 were not obviously craned or otherwise secondarily supported. They do show the stunt suits in the video too, so I'm sure they're not walking around great by any means. But even some advancement on that front would be super interesting.
Upon further review, the 3 suitable animatronics are the suit versions. The extent of the puppet head's capabilities is very impressive though, and the in-suit actors and puppeteers do a great job of making it look really incredibly seamless and maintaining a proper 'stance' outside of movements. I was lead astray by a shot from the back that I didn't realize was actually a different time they were filming where they clearly are the not-able-to-be-human shoulder joints/endo bits. What I get for clicking through his video instead of just knuckling down and pretending to have an attention span, lol. Yours I watched and enjoyed, so props to the chef c:
Imagine if they create a fnaf pizzeria that is normal lol.
you should make a video on how to survive the torture mask
Fun fact: the pic used for the puppets is actually the suit, look at the waist proportions of Freddy
What I find funny with his comments about springlock suits is that even in-universe not only was it an dumb idea, but some people also said it was stupid like movie Vanessa
I'm so glad i found this channel, its so fun!
tysm for explaining it so well i was so confused on how it works
The Reason Why Foxy Was Hard To Control Is Because The Foxy Was To Thin And The Thing on his back is a puppet rig to help him walk because no one cant be in foxy,btw
Nice black void at the end
Ah crap, I’ll have to cut that out, thanks for letting me know!
Np!
counterpoint on your vindication rant about the springlock suits
if they're supposed to be a cost-cutting measure, then arguing that the expensive premium workshop who built many custom models for different scenes didnt do the cheap but unsafe cost cutting measure is quite goofy
(not saying they make much irl sense regardless, just that it's not an argument you can make)
so they are costumes and they have the animatronic, and foxy is a whole animatronic and golden Freddy
Thank you for this! I thought this question would never be answered. love the video - new sub
bro i just came across ur channel and i genuinely love how you make your videos, subscribing for sure my dude. keep it up!
I’d love to see a video on your thoughts on how the Torture Freddy device worked, both in the film on set and in universe!
( )__( )
🔴 🔴
⚙️⚙️⚙️⚙️
⚙️⚙️⚙️
I think it’s actually pretty simple, they just grabbed a blender, pulled out the blades, and stuck them on the inside of a bear head!
If they didn't reveal who's operate those animatronics in movie, that would be cap. I know everything
The movie spring trap suit had a rib cage that was held open by spring locks. What up with that?
My headcannon is its part of the mechanism that instead of holding animatronic parts back, is designed to hold the suit on the user, basically they clap down on the users torso(not hard obviously)to hold the suit on their body, so it doesn't wobble while they move.
My reasoning is because it's better for stability than strap harnesses, makes them easier to get in and out of, during the heyday they where safe but with their age showing they have became unstable and are prone to snapping their locking mechanism(on the back of the ribs, the upper parts are based apon gears that lead back)which ofc causes the harness system to snap back into its "default" setting which ofc causes a springlocking.
Very good video answered all the questions i had after watching the movie definitely worth that sub 👍
Great video!
13:52 at least hey don't have corpses in them tho
Now that the movie is out can you update the puppet episode?
the movie its out
Yay, a new video!
the movie was great
What have we learned from this? Never give a crazy dumb person from the 80’s this advanced of technology
I do not think cupcake in fnaf movie is not CGI.
Thisiswhatihavetosee
Hey can you continue ur escaping fnaf series with other games
Wait ... Those were REAL!?
Yeah
didn't you constantly yap that they were CGI or was that someone else
I'm pretty sure this is the first time I've ever talked about the FNAF movie specifically on the channel, must have been someone else
@@TheChiptide ah all good then
Did anyone else see a rainbow trail around the Subscribe button when he was asking for subs?
Supposedly it’s some kind of new feature being beta tested on some accounts. Not everyone will see it
No people were in that suit.not like that
who is this green haired man on my screen
2nd
3rd
4th
@@TheChiptide Free Palestine
I'm Muslim and 12 years old
@@TheChiptidewhy afton never got caught because corrupted cops
What were they thinking making the animatronics irl that was an awful idea. I swear if people start going missing I'm gonna lose it
ngl my heart got crushed a bit when i learned that they werent 100% animatronics at all times 🥲
They're animatronics most of the time. For movements that the robots simply can't do, humans wear the costumes.