Did WHINEmiller giggle when female prosecutor (Nicole?) was speaking? Overstreet turned his head when it happened. th-cam.com/video/fEKgC--zN7A/w-d-xo.html
LMAO Defense is trying to argue that only prosecution had a week off (the week they had COVID). Bwahahaha! Defense also had that week off..... And they weren't even sick. Defense was clearly not ready for their case going into that week, and got the bonus of a vacant week to get everything lined up.
Woah, the bunkie has more dirt on Nancy than we knew. I'm gonna get me a batch of Q-tips, so my ears are squeaky clean for the tawdry details next week.
I just don’t get this trial. I’ve never NEVER seen a trial go down so many rabbit holes. Seems like the judge is letting in every damn thing that’s asked for.. defense has had so many redundant witnesses. Usually judges put a stop to the repetitive testimonies.
People get convicted everyday on the testimony of jailhouse snitches. On one hand, you would think "who can believe a felon" but they have pretty much nothing to do all day except talk. We all have the RIGHT to remain silent, very few people seem to have the ABILITY! And the fact that the snitch has convictions? None of the people in jail/prison are there because they were singing too loud in church...l think jurors just judge if they think the person is coming across honest on the day they testify.
Nancy has conned her Defense team: The defense is blaming the State for not pursuing the contents of the "letter" in March (the one that triggered this whole thing), but actually......... (2:09) it was a letter to Nancy, and Nancy has the original. The only reason the state has it is that it was intercepted at the jail, like every communication to prisoners. It was then copied, like every communication to prisoners. This whole time the original letter has been in Nancy's possession. The full knowledge of the contents has been hers. The identities of the women named in the letter were in her possession, since she was housed with them. She could have run this by her attorneys, and headed off this BS. She could have simply told her attorneys who all these women are in the letter who are only identified by first name. She could have explained to her attorneys the backstory. This is Defense's problem with THEIR CLIENT. They need to get livid with THEIR CLIENT. None of this, "it's all prosecution's fault, and now we can't prepare the case so Nancy gets her constitutional right." This is on NANCY. Their client is a SCAM ARTIST. She is as much a fraud as the bunkie, but no one has ever held her accountable. It's about time Defense put the blame where it belongs: their CLIENT. The con woman sitting next to them.
The Defense Team..are as living in a very similar mentally.altered world as their client who blends in with them.as if a heavier , as badly dressed , .Sister Did the Court appoint them.on did Nancy search on line for those mist likely.to attempt bamboozoling the Jury at her behest ? And my feelings are that the Judge is taking every precautions of avoiding a mistrial.if or when.this case goes to.appeal . Being seemingly unimposing is NOT equal to ineffective let alone unwise or uninformed .Fond his rather benign (?) outside refreshing & his verble ambles clearly demonstrate.he ain't the fool.some commentators imply him to be . Having listened to his summation prior to sentencing .convinced me that my earlier thoughts regarding him.were correct & at certain.momenrs when he addressed the Prosecutor it was evident he respected him.while attempting not to let any annoyance or aggravation caused by the interminable witnesses who permitted to also be " successful." Authors paraded themselves . As someone who once she had learnt to read has used books , both fiction & non , as a drug, demand that those p am.particularly
I started watching this with a completely open mind and nonjudgmental. We are now on week 3 and am at the point that if I have to listen to these two defense attorneys anymore, I'm going outside and scream as loud as I can! The State's attorneys are both very knowledgeable and definitely are a lot more professional than the defense attorneys. It just infuriates me when the two of them sit over there and giggle like school kids if they don't like something the State does. They have constantly whined from day one that the State is not "playing fair" and quite honestly, I think it's just the opposite. I am convinced Nancy is guilty, and I personally caught one lie that the niece who lived with her told. I hope the jury remembers Nancy is a want-a-be writer and dreams up stories in her head, so she probably had Dan's death all planned out. Most importantly, how is she going to explain why she was seen on video leaving OCI right after Dan died. She said she was home in bed, when it's very clear she wasn't.
I know you wrote this a few months back but I figure I'll ask anyway... do you remember where the laughing part is? I didn't notice anything off with the defense so I'm hoping to form an opinion on it
@@AliceA333 I'm sorry, I don't remember. I can tell you they did it several times & quite a few people commented on the same thing. They were so unprofessional. I hope you watch it until the end. Nancy on the stand was really unbelievable.
@@susannormand7486 Thanks for responding! I didn't hear about this case until the trial was over so I have a lot of catch up, but I'm fascinated so I'm watching the whole thing.
@@susannormand7486 I'm still watching it, going back on some of the video! Yes the defense attorneys were disgusting! Giggle, whisper, rattle paper, whining about everything, trying to sling mud on prosecutor! And the witnesses weren't helping far as I was concerned!! The one woman, psychologist or whatever she claimed to be,so boring, didn't make sense, reading off papers, didn't seem professional at all to me, certainly didn't look it,& her hair-always fiddling with it pushing back! The big scene the grey haired defense attorney tried to make about COVID when prosecutor Mr. Overstreet started to approach them about something, give a paper, not sure but she jumped up telling judge to make him get back!! There were just so much about them,& didn't seem like the judge called them out about anything,let them get by with too much!!
The way the defense treated Nancy's former cellmate is absolutely appalling. I hope the Oregon BAR suspended her for her misconduct! Honestly, wtf does a DENTIST have to do with this case?
Is this the first time these defense attorneys have encountered an inmate testifying at trial for the other side/against their client? They act like it's the end of the world. They can't do their work properly now. Wow.
It may be the first time such a significant jailhouse witness was sprung on them near the end of the trial. It does put them in a bind. I can understand why they are upset. The defendant doesn’t seem bothered by it though.
Defense goes for quantity not quality. Their idea of vindicating NB is innumerable witnesses saying the same thing: that she's wonderful and the marriage is perfect. To discredit Jacobs they need 6 mos to collect innumerable witnesses to all say the same thing: she's a liar.
Barbara Grove you're right! And almost every time the defense said anything,they always had to tell the same lines,story,how much nb and Dan were in love,loved each other,had such a good marriage,blah blah blah!! They never convinced me, maybe they believed it,or who they were trying to convince!! That soft, sickening sweet voice!! And nb always saying Dan said this,Dan said that, what he had planned,or would do or say!! When does it become hearsay for her to use that, because when other people try to say something it becomes hearsay!!!
It’s only the “writer” aspect that has changed this trial from a garden variety trial into a “high profile” one. And it’s ludicrous because Nancy was a self proclaimed self published writer, not a successful one like JK Rowling or Danielle Steele. Nancy Brophy is a hack who sold very few of her self published books. And poor Chef Dan not only had to subsidize her pipe dream, but also pay for it with his life. Anyone of us could write some drivel and post it for sale on Amazon. But, alas National news got ahold of this “story” (CNN, NY Post, etc) and now we are in a trial grinding into day 21. Why? Because of a spineless Judge who apparently is scared to death he'll do something wrong "in front of the cameras". Think of the poor jurors, for God's sake, how much longer do you expect them to be in this purgatory?
You have Nancy to a T. She never was a writer-she can’t write worth a darn, and she’s very sloppy-except in her imagination. Being a writer is something she conned the world into believing, just like the sham marriage and the perfect relationship. My opinion is the judge is doing a great job insofar as making Nancy’s case unappealable. Then this con of a woman can be put away forever. Yes, the judge is boring and maybe gives too much latitude to defense, but Nancy’s con becomes ever more obvious every moment defense throws up another irrelevant or incompetent witness.
The writer aspect along with Chef Brophy being a well known accomplished chef and Nancy Brophy appearing to be a sweet “old” lady made this high profile.
@@sleuththewild the defense starting out with this dentist & Mrs Jacobs are trying to "shade"Mrs. Jacobs, make her sound & look even worse than what she was charged!! Trying to distract from the evil her client was being tried for!!
I’m disagree - I think her failure as a writer (though her post “how to kill your husband” is sensational in light of her crime) is more fascinating to the public and Dan’s incredible success as a good human is much more at play in the media reports.
That is so true...the prosecution didn't have copies of any of that federal trial stuff and when he asked about it, defense sniped that she was "surprised and assumed they would have looked into all this themselves." Well, no...as many of those angry lawyer witnesses said in the morning session...Jacobs' public wrap sheet is long enough to discredit her to infinity and beyond without prying into privileged info.
And remember, they're doing this AFTER springing a last minute witness on the prosecution and not going about it in a way that was all kosher for the court. So on top of everything, she's a hypocrite, too.
Can’t believe complaining doing their job, isn’t that what they are paid for? And seriously, it’s like they are having a trial within a trial, by all means just get on with it, defence can call her a lier, bla bla, but at the end on the day, defence already helped her look guilty. And who is the victim here, it’s Dan, it sure isn’t Nancy!
Nancy’s gonna zero out her commissary account paying for these attorneys. She’s actually gonna have to work for the first time in decades, and now it will be for Nescafe, not Starbucks. She coulda worked at Walmart that whole time and avoided this. She wouldnta be cleaning toilets for a nickel an hour, either.
@@GrizzlyUrsusArctos Maxfield. She's upset that she's having to do so much work. a) She coulda hired someone to help; and b) she coulds skipped all this c***p today and the rest of this week. We've been listening to empty babbling all week.
Judge, a court officer has testified twelve thousand times that no deals were made or offered. You've now allowed, aka wasted, countless hours for the defense to pretend this isn't the case, or to feign ignorance and confusion. Fine. But do YOU need to mimic that ignorance?
Has anyone else noticed the large proportion of people in Nancy's universe who do "Nancy-babble"? It's like hours of scripted, hackneyed, "off the cuff" jibber jabber. We had family members and fantasy writers in this mode. It was driving me crazy how alike they all are. Defense Attorney W is like this, too. I had to shut off the testimony today. It's all just words on words, when she could just shut up and get on with it.
I just don’t understand why she’s allowed to belabor the issue and run circles around the judge with so much garbage. This judge just can’t fall for this.
@@GrizzlyUrsusArctos Now the defense is practically in tears that they "had" to do all that work. They could have chosen a different strategy. And now, on top of everything else, they have, like, 20 Portland attorneys TICKED that they had to use their precious time for humoring the defense team, when defense could skip all this verbosity and deal with it efficiently in cross.
Ms. Weinmiller needs to own her job instead of whingeing about how hard her job is. If it is too hard, then get another profession or focus on traffic ticket defense.
she look so crazy, im not surprise she choked an inmate, I can see her with a gun saying this poor Dan ''you're done, Im smarter than you coach potato sports, I get this money, goodbye''
The week before he was murdered, Dan sliced his hand on a shattering shower door. He had to have stitches. Wanna bet, there was no shattering shower door?
@@Theresa_44 😂🤣funny but really sad. How does she get all these women to say how wonderful she is? I think they are all getting something if she walks. But I pray the jury gets this right. Guilty
The defense seems to be so concerned about her constitutional rights despite the fact Nancy was the one talking in jail. They have also brought up arguments that will help if there is ever an appeal. Considering the cost of this trial, has to be in the millions, how will they afford the appeal? Let’s say they would over turn this trial down the road. Nancy will drain all of her family money for her greed. She is a selfish woman.
Nancy was also the one who had the letter in her possession. The defense has had all this jailhouse snitch info BEFORE the state, because it was a letter to Nancy. The state got a copy of it through the Corrections dept. Nancy also knew all the people in the letter; the Defense didn't need to go digging for it, do research, verify, ANY of that. Nancy had it. It's time to hold Nancy accountable for ALL her cons. She's evidently conning Defense, too.
She doesn't care. She's exploited family her whole life. Even her van wasn't hers, Dan's parents let her borrow it, Nancy racked up a ton of parking tickets cuz she didn't care as it wasn't her car. She then refused to pay the tickets with the same argument (not my car, not my problem) and in desperation the Brophys just gifted her her van and put it in her name so their credit wouldn't be screwed from the unpaid tickets. She also scammed her employees and refused to pay them. She's lived off of money from her family members most of her life, and did nothing to contribute to her household or her marriage in any way. There are no words for how much I loathe this woman.
Not to make you more angry…but the “millions” spent on trial & appeal are tax paid dollars. She had public defenders…the life insurance policies didn’t pay her bc she was convicted of the murder.
@maryb6672 no not public defenders....they are both in private practice together. Pacific NorthWest Law firm.....she may be indigent now and they may be being paid a lower rate by the state but initially they were acquired and paid for by Nancy and picked by her family lawyers.
Ms. Hermann is blowing a golden opportunity due to her incoherent argument. It needs to be tight and logical and previewed. Tell the court what you are going to argue, argue it, then tell the court what you have argued. Geez. Lawyer 101.
Another thing regarding the bobsey twins (defense attorneys). They keep forgetting to rise when addressing the judge. 😮!! And then when they see the state rise, they'll get their butts up, too. As in,... oops, I'm learning how to practice law from him. Such a simple, easy thing that they have trouble with. Is it any wonder how they're handling the rest of this case lol.
This whole song and dance seems like an attempt to have on the record that defense counsel was more or less forced into IAC by the state in order to lodge an appeal. Ridiculous and shady
I understand the prosecution wants to make their case as tight as possible. To me this seems like a big waste of time. Their case is already strong. Even if they get this witness in I doubt it would make a difference. The Jury is going to be skeptical of her.
The content of the testimony will most likely overrule any skepticism. Defense conceded that Jacobs is an influential witness. Defense panties are all in a wad trying to prevent the testimony.
I feel sorry for her. This wasn't necessary, she's now in mortal danger by the other inmates for being a snitch and has been threatened every day. Iso doesn't exist where she's incarcerated, so she could very well be assaulted or worse. And for what? A mere faux pas that may or may not be incriminating? Not worth risking her life over.
TH-cam throws this video at me and I have seen it already, wish it didnt do that. I'm so sick of these two old bitty defense lawyers! Soooo hard done by, you would think they were overworked and under paid by the taxpayers! They arent! They are being paid by Nancy using Dan's hard earned money! They whine, they piss and they moan. Saying the State had 1 week extra on the case when they had covid is just going to far! I'm at the end and they both did the crying and tears for the Judge and he falls for that crap every time when these lawyers need to be reminded they decided to take this case and they are surely being paid well! Useless cheaters is what the two of them are. I bet any money their law firm has lost clients because of their actions in this case. People want strong attorneys not crying old ladies who are so unorganized, racist also with trying to put the blame on a homeless black man and lets not forget while they run Andrea Jacobs down with all kinds of harsh words they are sitting beside their client who shot her husband in the back 3 fricken times! I mean wow just wow how low these so called attorneys are going! So happy the states kicked their ass !!
I understand & agree that death is extremely serious (and justice is deserved), but... I would say that being accused of being a wife-beater and SA'er, is also very serious. Accusing somebody of R*PE is a horrific thing. As a survivor of both DV & SA, I don't blame J.D. for wanting to clear his name, from those horrific accusations. Having watched _that_ trial everyday (along with this one), I believe that Amber is/was the aggressor and should be removed as a spokesperson from the ACLU. The new recordings that are coming out, are truly horrific! A victim doesn't taunt/ instigate, chase, belittle, etc., their abuser. They try to get away, whenever they can, and try to keep their abuser "happy." I can't wait for Amber to be crossed, and I hope that Nancy takes the stand, but I doubt she will... My gut is telling me, she's not going to, in the end.
During the morning session a man lawyer who was there to testify said "l understand you're closing this case on the 20th" to which the judge replied "we are???" I think some people got confused because it was two similar voices. But more than once last week, the judge told the jury that starting next week they would be using Fridays for trial too...plural...so l don't think the 20th is the end of the trial. Prosecution rested on the 12th day...the 20th would make 12 days for the defense...so maybe (hopefully) it will be the end of their side of the case.
@@barbaragrove6097 there are no restrictions at this time for both. NB is a defense witness and AJ is a prosecution witness. There is conjecture that if AJ testified, NB won’t. No actual knowledge by any of us.
@@barbaragrove6097 - you have it backwards. If AJ is a potential rebuttal witness, then she will be called to rebut NB’s testimony. If NB decides not to testify, then I don’t think AJ could testify.
After today's Circus, I am now completely convinced that Portlandia has not changed - especially in the court room. See Witness box next to Defendant....for starters. th-cam.com/video/TZt-pOc3moc/w-d-xo.html
Tour really??? She's WEARISOME, tiring!!! Don't know if you ever heard the "better to let ppl think you are a fool than open your mouth,talk,& prove they were right";!! Or something like that.
@@vernareed2692 Oh well, yes. That was my first impression - intelligent, likable? You're right, once she opened her mouth and the prosecution let her rattle on and on an on, it became so clear she is an evil, manipulative person! Never judge a book by it's cover! lol
I found Nancy very unlikable, a liar for sure and a very poor manager. She couldn't manage to pay their mortgage but still paid hundreds of dollars a month on unnecessary life insurance policies. They traveled to the Orient on a lengthy trip but Dan still had to sell herbs 🌿 and eggs 🥚 to make ends meet. NB did not cook for the 25 years of marriage and spent $1000 dollars a year on Starbucks!!! What a shallow and spoiled woman !!!
never seen a trial more boring than this one, its supposed to be take seriously by the procecuror but he is very downer and low voice, the defense you have 2 lesbians with the same dead voice and beside them a crazy woman who suppose to testify but I dont think it will happend a day...she's gonna be free soon and nobody cares of this poor husband full of life killed by this selfish black widow...I cant stand it...3 weeks for nothing...
Watch the prosecutor at work. He's very Joe Average until he suddenly stabs. And he's very creative in how he stabs. He has a gotcha for every Defense witness.
She's gonna be free soon??? If she leaves in a body bag maybe. You must be watching a different trial...she will be convicted...and because the trial was meticulously conducted, the conviction will stand up to the inevitable appeal. She will be serving a life sentence.
Defense seems to think a jailhouse snitch triggers an entirely separate trial for the jailhouse snitch. Ridiculous
I've reached a point where I fast forward the Defense direct and skip to prosecution cross.
Me, too. I can tell what defense was presenting by listening to the prosecution. You've heard one defense witness, and you've heard them all.
Me too... the defence may have benefited from some 'brainstorming' beforehand in the hope that their story may be a tad more cogent!!
Why does the defence keep giggling while they argue. It sounds so unprofessional.
Did WHINEmiller giggle when female prosecutor (Nicole?) was speaking? Overstreet turned his head when it happened. th-cam.com/video/fEKgC--zN7A/w-d-xo.html
Weird nervous tic, I think.
Infuriating.
Ms. Weinmiller loves the sound of her voice, loves to chuckle at her own words, and feels that every noun requires three adjectives.
Definitely loves to hear herself talk. She repeats things multiple times, probably to keep talking.
And Overstreet is a shirking violet. The sound of his voice is punishing. All he does is whine like a b**
LMAO Defense is trying to argue that only prosecution had a week off (the week they had COVID). Bwahahaha! Defense also had that week off..... And they weren't even sick. Defense was clearly not ready for their case going into that week, and got the bonus of a vacant week to get everything lined up.
Woah, the bunkie has more dirt on Nancy than we knew. I'm gonna get me a batch of Q-tips, so my ears are squeaky clean for the tawdry details next week.
:) :) :) :) :) :)
I just don’t get this trial. I’ve never NEVER seen a trial go down so many rabbit holes. Seems like the judge is letting in every damn thing that’s asked for.. defense has had so many redundant witnesses. Usually judges put a stop to the repetitive testimonies.
Defense is scared of Ms Jacobs testimony!!!
People get convicted everyday on the testimony of jailhouse snitches. On one hand, you would think "who can believe a felon" but they have pretty much nothing to do all day except talk. We all have the RIGHT to remain silent, very few people seem to have the ABILITY! And the fact that the snitch has convictions? None of the people in jail/prison are there because they were singing too loud in church...l think jurors just judge if they think the person is coming across honest on the day they testify.
@@saharaussery6799Well said
Nancy has conned her Defense team: The defense is blaming the State for not pursuing the contents of the "letter" in March (the one that triggered this whole thing), but actually......... (2:09) it was a letter to Nancy, and Nancy has the original. The only reason the state has it is that it was intercepted at the jail, like every communication to prisoners. It was then copied, like every communication to prisoners.
This whole time the original letter has been in Nancy's possession.
The full knowledge of the contents has been hers. The identities of the women named in the letter were in her possession, since she was housed with them. She could have run this by her attorneys, and headed off this BS. She could have simply told her attorneys who all these women are in the letter who are only identified by first name. She could have explained to her attorneys the backstory.
This is Defense's problem with THEIR CLIENT. They need to get livid with THEIR CLIENT. None of this, "it's all prosecution's fault, and now we can't prepare the case so Nancy gets her constitutional right." This is on NANCY.
Their client is a SCAM ARTIST. She is as much a fraud as the bunkie, but no one has ever held her accountable. It's about time Defense put the blame where it belongs: their CLIENT. The con woman sitting next to them.
The Defense Team..are as living in a very similar mentally.altered world as their client who blends in with them.as if a heavier , as badly dressed , .Sister Did the Court appoint them.on did Nancy search on line for those mist likely.to attempt bamboozoling the Jury at her behest ? And my feelings are that the Judge is taking every precautions of avoiding a mistrial.if or when.this case goes to.appeal . Being seemingly unimposing is NOT equal to ineffective let alone unwise or uninformed .Fond his rather benign (?) outside refreshing & his verble ambles clearly demonstrate.he ain't the fool.some commentators imply him to be . Having listened to his summation prior to sentencing .convinced me that my earlier thoughts regarding him.were correct & at certain.momenrs when he addressed the Prosecutor it was evident he respected him.while attempting not to let any annoyance or aggravation caused by the interminable witnesses who permitted to also be " successful." Authors paraded themselves . As someone who once she had learnt to read has used books , both fiction & non , as a drug, demand that those p am.particularly
I started watching this with a completely open mind and nonjudgmental. We are now on week 3 and am at the point that if I have to listen to these two defense attorneys anymore, I'm going outside and scream as loud as I can! The State's attorneys are both very knowledgeable and definitely are a lot more professional than the defense attorneys. It just infuriates me when the two of them sit over there and giggle like school kids if they don't like something the State does. They have constantly whined from day one that the State is not "playing fair" and quite honestly, I think it's just the opposite. I am convinced Nancy is guilty, and I personally caught one lie that the niece who lived with her told. I hope the jury remembers Nancy is a want-a-be writer and dreams up stories in her head, so she probably had Dan's death all planned out. Most importantly, how is she going to explain why she was seen on video leaving OCI right after Dan died. She said she was home in bed, when it's very clear she wasn't.
I know you wrote this a few months back but I figure I'll ask anyway... do you remember where the laughing part is? I didn't notice anything off with the defense so I'm hoping to form an opinion on it
@@AliceA333 I'm sorry, I don't remember. I can tell you they did it several times & quite a few people commented on the same thing. They were so unprofessional. I hope you watch it until the end. Nancy on the stand was really unbelievable.
@@susannormand7486 Thanks for responding! I didn't hear about this case until the trial was over so I have a lot of catch up, but I'm fascinated so I'm watching the whole thing.
@@AliceA333 You'll be glad you did.
@@susannormand7486 I'm still watching it, going back on some of the video! Yes the defense attorneys were disgusting! Giggle, whisper, rattle paper, whining about everything, trying to sling mud on prosecutor! And the witnesses weren't helping far as I was concerned!! The one woman, psychologist or whatever she claimed to be,so boring, didn't make sense, reading off papers, didn't seem professional at all to me, certainly didn't look it,& her hair-always fiddling with it pushing back! The big scene the grey haired defense attorney tried to make about COVID when prosecutor Mr. Overstreet started to approach them about something, give a paper, not sure but she jumped up telling judge to make him get back!! There were just so much about them,& didn't seem like the judge called them out about anything,let them get by with too much!!
The way the defense treated Nancy's former cellmate is absolutely appalling. I hope the Oregon BAR suspended her for her misconduct! Honestly, wtf does a DENTIST have to do with this case?
Shows that’s she’s “a good actress” and simply a liar so her credibility should be in question
This is a mini trial within the real trial.
Now Ms. Maxfield whinges and cries. Please give us a break.
Is this the first time these defense attorneys have encountered an inmate testifying at trial for the other side/against their client? They act like it's the end of the world. They can't do their work properly now. Wow.
It may be the first time such a significant jailhouse witness was sprung on them near the end of the trial. It does put them in a bind. I can understand why they are upset. The defendant doesn’t seem bothered by it though.
Lord she never looked upset about anything!!! Which I find astounding!!!!
Defense goes for quantity not quality. Their idea of vindicating NB is innumerable witnesses saying the same thing: that she's wonderful and the marriage is perfect. To discredit Jacobs they need 6 mos to collect innumerable witnesses to all say the same thing: she's a liar.
Barbara Grove you're right! And almost every time the defense said anything,they always had to tell the same lines,story,how much nb and Dan were in love,loved each other,had such a good marriage,blah blah blah!! They never convinced me, maybe they believed it,or who they were trying to convince!! That soft, sickening sweet voice!! And nb always saying Dan said this,Dan said that, what he had planned,or would do or say!! When does it become hearsay for her to use that, because when other people try to say something it becomes hearsay!!!
This Defense is a hot-sizzling-mess. So unorganized. Good Grief.
Defense calls a witness a "beast"? Wow....
When? Can you please give a timestamp?
This trial is NOT about the character of Ms. Jacobs, notwithstanding the irrelevance of her character as regards THIS trial.
It’s only the “writer” aspect that has changed this trial from a garden variety trial into a “high profile” one. And it’s ludicrous because Nancy was a self proclaimed self published writer, not a successful one like JK Rowling or Danielle Steele. Nancy Brophy is a hack who sold very few of her self published books. And poor Chef Dan not only had to subsidize her pipe dream, but also pay for it with his life. Anyone of us could write some drivel and post it for sale on Amazon. But, alas National news got ahold of this “story” (CNN, NY Post, etc) and now we are in a trial grinding into day 21. Why? Because of a spineless Judge who apparently is scared to death he'll do something wrong "in front of the cameras". Think of the poor jurors, for God's sake, how much longer do you expect them to be in this purgatory?
You have Nancy to a T. She never was a writer-she can’t write worth a darn, and she’s very sloppy-except in her imagination.
Being a writer is something she conned the world into believing, just like the sham marriage and the perfect relationship.
My opinion is the judge is doing a great job insofar as making Nancy’s case unappealable. Then this con of a woman can be put away forever.
Yes, the judge is boring and maybe gives too much latitude to defense, but Nancy’s con becomes ever more obvious every moment defense throws up another irrelevant or incompetent witness.
The writer aspect along with Chef Brophy being a well known accomplished chef and Nancy Brophy appearing to be a sweet “old” lady made this high profile.
@@sleuththewild the defense starting out with this dentist & Mrs Jacobs are trying to "shade"Mrs. Jacobs, make her sound & look even worse than what she was charged!! Trying to distract from the evil her client was being tried for!!
I’m disagree - I think her failure as a writer (though her post “how to kill your husband” is sensational in light of her crime) is more fascinating to the public and Dan’s incredible success as a good human is much more at play in the media reports.
Now the defense attorneys are complaining that they had to spend all this time whacking the weeds. Bwahahaha! They brought this all on themselves.
That is so true...the prosecution didn't have copies of any of that federal trial stuff and when he asked about it, defense sniped that she was "surprised and assumed they would have looked into all this themselves." Well, no...as many of those angry lawyer witnesses said in the morning session...Jacobs' public wrap sheet is long enough to discredit her to infinity and beyond without prying into privileged info.
And remember, they're doing this AFTER springing a last minute witness on the prosecution and not going about it in a way that was all kosher for the court. So on top of everything, she's a hypocrite, too.
More drama today than most of the regular trial days.
Can’t believe complaining doing their job, isn’t that what they are paid for? And seriously, it’s like they are having a trial within a trial, by all means just get on with it, defence can call her a lier, bla bla, but at the end on the day, defence already helped her look guilty. And who is the victim here, it’s Dan, it sure isn’t Nancy!
The Defence are asking too much the Judge must squash the Defence’s needs
Notice the Man killer wasn’t writing today lol
Guilty!!!
👍🏽
Maxfield is now talking as if they have no paralegals, assistants, investigators or secretaries. Liar liar pants on fire.
Defense wants more time for their fishing expeditions as defense grasps for ANY straws.
I do think they are wasting time...Prosecution does not need the jail bird snitch.
Has this judge ever heard of the phrase “probative value”?
Waffle. Waffle. Waffle from the defence. And guess what; prison IS a very degraded environment.
I feel like Ms Jacobs is on trial. Nice switch and bait. 🤣
INCOMPETENT defence & judge. Constant tea parties with her lawyers, irrelevant interrogation dragging on & on. S he is a master deceiver wow.
The judge is doing a fine job. I think he knows more about his job than you do.
THE JUDGE IS VERY GOOD ,VERY UNFAIR COMMENT
What has this got to do with the murder? Why does the Judge permit the
The Friday session was for argument of motions. You have to watch from the beginning to understand it.
Here we go. Defense wanting to extend the length of a trial.
Wow .. the lesson here is check references, do background & police files for all new hires.
Future objectives? What legal universe does this defense lawyer inhabit?
It's getting tedious now.....
Friday was anything but tedious for trial watchers.
@@GH-oi2jf Exactly. Some of the defense witnesses though... THAT was tedious. 😐
@@faceless_woman - yes
Nancy’s gonna zero out her commissary account paying for these attorneys.
She’s actually gonna have to work for the first time in decades, and now it will be for Nescafe, not Starbucks.
She coulda worked at Walmart that whole time and avoided this. She wouldnta be cleaning toilets for a nickel an hour, either.
That woman was making a fool of herself throwing a tantrum in the courtroom like a five year old
Who?
@@GrizzlyUrsusArctos defence lawyer 3:12:47
@@அவானிஉயர்ந்தது Aw. You are correct. Can’t stand her lawyering style at all.
@@GrizzlyUrsusArctos Maxfield. She's upset that she's having to do so much work. a) She coulda hired someone to help; and b) she coulds skipped all this c***p today and the rest of this week. We've been listening to empty babbling all week.
@@அவானிஉயர்ந்தது - There is nothing at 7:32.
Judge, a court officer has testified twelve thousand times that no deals were made or offered. You've now allowed, aka wasted, countless hours for the defense to pretend this isn't the case, or to feign ignorance and confusion. Fine. But do YOU need to mimic that ignorance?
Has anyone else noticed the large proportion of people in Nancy's universe who do "Nancy-babble"? It's like hours of scripted, hackneyed, "off the cuff" jibber jabber. We had family members and fantasy writers in this mode. It was driving me crazy how alike they all are. Defense Attorney W is like this, too. I had to shut off the testimony today. It's all just words on words, when she could just shut up and get on with it.
I just don’t understand why she’s allowed to belabor the issue and run circles around the judge with so much garbage. This judge just can’t fall for this.
Yup. I did the same thing because defence’s witnesses just unbearable
I feel like I’m at court school. This didn’t need a whole day to get to the point. Let the witness in. Make objections if needed and do your dam job!
@@GrizzlyUrsusArctos Now the defense is practically in tears that they "had" to do all that work. They could have chosen a different strategy. And now, on top of everything else, they have, like, 20 Portland attorneys TICKED that they had to use their precious time for humoring the defense team, when defense could skip all this verbosity and deal with it efficiently in cross.
I did the same thing. I couldn’t listen to her anymore. Does she ever pause to take a breath?
Ms. Weinmiller needs to own her job instead of whingeing about how hard her job is. If it is too hard, then get another profession or focus on traffic ticket defense.
Ms. Whingemiller
One more thing…. Did you hear today she choked an inmate and has a really bad temper. No one knows what really went on it that house. Poor Dan
she look so crazy, im not surprise she choked an inmate, I can see her with a gun saying this poor Dan ''you're done, Im smarter than you coach potato sports, I get this money, goodbye''
The week before he was murdered, Dan sliced his hand on a shattering shower door. He had to have stitches. Wanna bet, there was no shattering shower door?
@@Theresa_44 😂🤣funny but really sad. How does she get all these women to say how wonderful she is? I think they are all getting something if she walks. But I pray the jury gets this right. Guilty
Overstreet.
@@sleuththewild About where in the video was Overstreet’s comment?
The defense seems to be so concerned about her constitutional rights despite the fact Nancy was the one talking in jail. They have also brought up arguments that will help if there is ever an appeal. Considering the cost of this trial, has to be in the millions, how will they afford the appeal? Let’s say they would over turn this trial down the road. Nancy will drain all of her family money for her greed. She is a selfish woman.
Nancy was also the one who had the letter in her possession. The defense has had all this jailhouse snitch info BEFORE the state, because it was a letter to Nancy. The state got a copy of it through the Corrections dept. Nancy also knew all the people in the letter; the Defense didn't need to go digging for it, do research, verify, ANY of that. Nancy had it.
It's time to hold Nancy accountable for ALL her cons. She's evidently conning Defense, too.
She doesn't care. She's exploited family her whole life. Even her van wasn't hers, Dan's parents let her borrow it, Nancy racked up a ton of parking tickets cuz she didn't care as it wasn't her car. She then refused to pay the tickets with the same argument (not my car, not my problem) and in desperation the Brophys just gifted her her van and put it in her name so their credit wouldn't be screwed from the unpaid tickets.
She also scammed her employees and refused to pay them. She's lived off of money from her family members most of her life, and did nothing to contribute to her household or her marriage in any way.
There are no words for how much I loathe this woman.
Not to make you more angry…but the “millions” spent on trial & appeal are tax paid dollars. She had public defenders…the life insurance policies didn’t pay her bc she was convicted of the murder.
@maryb6672 no not public defenders....they are both in private practice together. Pacific NorthWest Law firm.....she may be indigent now and they may be being paid a lower rate by the state but initially they were acquired and paid for by Nancy and picked by her family lawyers.
Ms. Hermann is blowing a golden opportunity due to her incoherent argument. It needs to be tight and logical and previewed. Tell the court what you are going to argue, argue it, then tell the court what you have argued. Geez. Lawyer 101.
Another thing regarding the bobsey twins (defense attorneys). They keep forgetting to rise when addressing the judge. 😮!! And then when they see the state rise, they'll get their butts up, too. As in,... oops, I'm learning how to practice law from him.
Such a simple, easy thing that they have trouble with. Is it any wonder how they're handling the rest of this case lol.
2:34 Fish....? Wha? The hell are you talking about, why is fish the reason the cellmate shouldn't be allowed to testify?
Geez complain complain defense that's why these attnys must PLEASE retire.
Nothing but innuendo by the defense. Defense have nothing but briefcases full of nothing.
"Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, SO HELP YOU GOD?"
There, fixed it for you, Court!
It's called the first amendment. God has no place in government.
@@WobblesandBean
America was Founded by Christians. Get the F out of America!
This whole song and dance seems like an attempt to have on the record that defense counsel was more or less forced into IAC by the state in order to lodge an appeal. Ridiculous and shady
How long does it take on this stupid trial.
Overstreet repeats himself- a lot.
Not nearly as much as the defense.
Jeese, take a breath lady!!
I understand the prosecution wants to make their case as tight as possible. To me this seems like a big waste of time. Their case is already strong. Even if they get this witness in I doubt it would make a difference. The Jury is going to be skeptical of her.
Defense exhausted themselves trying to keep her out. Either way, prosecution wins.
The content of the testimony will most likely overrule any skepticism. Defense conceded that Jacobs is an influential witness. Defense panties are all in a wad trying to prevent the testimony.
I feel sorry for her. This wasn't necessary, she's now in mortal danger by the other inmates for being a snitch and has been threatened every day. Iso doesn't exist where she's incarcerated, so she could very well be assaulted or worse.
And for what? A mere faux pas that may or may not be incriminating? Not worth risking her life over.
Only in Portland: “tear-gassed during the protests going on downtown.” Protests? As in shooting, rioting, arson, and looting?
TH-cam throws this video at me and I have seen it already, wish it didnt do that. I'm so sick of these two old bitty defense lawyers! Soooo hard done by, you would think they were overworked and under paid by the taxpayers! They arent! They are being paid by Nancy using Dan's hard earned money! They whine, they piss and they moan. Saying the State had 1 week extra on the case when they had covid is just going to far! I'm at the end and they both did the crying and tears for the Judge and he falls for that crap every time when these lawyers need to be reminded they decided to take this case and they are surely being paid well! Useless cheaters is what the two of them are. I bet any money their law firm has lost clients because of their actions in this case. People want strong attorneys not crying old ladies who are so unorganized, racist also with trying to put the blame on a homeless black man and lets not forget while they run Andrea Jacobs down with all kinds of harsh words they are sitting beside their client who shot her husband in the back 3 fricken times! I mean wow just wow how low these so called attorneys are going! So happy the states kicked their ass !!
cant wait for Depp/Heard next week, a lot of laugh and action, not like this dead trial...
I understand & agree that death is extremely serious (and justice is deserved), but... I would say that being accused of being a wife-beater and SA'er, is also very serious. Accusing somebody of R*PE is a horrific thing.
As a survivor of both DV & SA, I don't blame J.D. for wanting to clear his name, from those horrific accusations. Having watched _that_ trial everyday (along with this one), I believe that Amber is/was the aggressor and should be removed as a spokesperson from the ACLU. The new recordings that are coming out, are truly horrific! A victim doesn't taunt/ instigate, chase, belittle, etc., their abuser. They try to get away, whenever they can, and try to keep their abuser "happy."
I can't wait for Amber to be crossed, and I hope that Nancy takes the stand, but I doubt she will... My gut is telling me, she's not going to, in the end.
Why does a bloke have shoulder pads in their suit jacket???
Many men’s suits have shoulder pads. You just don’t see them in a highly tailored suit.
Who thinks this will be over by this time next week.. ?😆
During the morning session a man lawyer who was there to testify said "l understand you're closing this case on the 20th" to which the judge replied "we are???" I think some people got confused because it was two similar voices. But more than once last week, the judge told the jury that starting next week they would be using Fridays for trial too...plural...so l don't think the 20th is the end of the trial. Prosecution rested on the 12th day...the 20th would make 12 days for the defense...so maybe (hopefully) it will be the end of their side of the case.
The defense attorneys are gonna talk themselves into an early grave.
Repeat testimony ????
can they stop talking and fast forward pls, Im about to die soon
WHINEmiller especially
Who thinks Judge Ramras will allow AJ to testify?
I think she will be allowed as a rebuttal witness, but if she is, perhaps NB will not testify. In that case, she could not testify.
@@GH-oi2jf If NB testifies then AJ could not?
@@barbaragrove6097 there are no restrictions at this time for both. NB is a defense witness and AJ is a prosecution witness. There is conjecture that if AJ testified, NB won’t. No actual knowledge by any of us.
@@hoppy6141 thanks
@@barbaragrove6097 - you have it backwards. If AJ is a potential rebuttal witness, then she will be called to rebut NB’s testimony. If NB decides not to testify, then I don’t think AJ could testify.
After today's Circus, I am now completely convinced that Portlandia has not changed - especially in the court room. See Witness box next to Defendant....for starters.
th-cam.com/video/TZt-pOc3moc/w-d-xo.html
Day 21, Nancy's testimony. Goodness, she's certainly likable. And, you can see, very intelligent.
Tour really??? She's WEARISOME, tiring!!! Don't know if you ever heard the "better to let ppl think you are a fool than open your mouth,talk,& prove they were right";!! Or something like that.
@@vernareed2692 Oh well, yes. That was my first impression - intelligent, likable? You're right, once she opened her mouth and the prosecution let her rattle on and on an on, it became so clear she is an evil, manipulative person! Never judge a book by it's cover! lol
I found Nancy very unlikable, a liar for sure and a very poor manager. She couldn't manage to pay their mortgage but still paid hundreds of dollars a month on unnecessary life insurance policies. They traveled to the Orient on a lengthy trip but Dan still had to sell herbs 🌿 and eggs 🥚 to make ends meet. NB did not cook for the 25 years of marriage and spent $1000 dollars a year on Starbucks!!! What a shallow and spoiled woman !!!
never seen a trial more boring than this one, its supposed to be take seriously by the procecuror but he is very downer and low voice, the defense you have 2 lesbians with the same dead voice and beside them a crazy woman who suppose to testify but I dont think it will happend a day...she's gonna be free soon and nobody cares of this poor husband full of life killed by this selfish black widow...I cant stand it...3 weeks for nothing...
She’s going down
Watch the prosecutor at work. He's very Joe Average until he suddenly stabs. And he's very creative in how he stabs. He has a gotcha for every Defense witness.
How do you know they’re lesbians and why would that matter? Just asking.
not good for NB, defense is crashing the plane and who cares about defense lawyers orientation
She's gonna be free soon??? If she leaves in a body bag maybe. You must be watching a different trial...she will be convicted...and because the trial was meticulously conducted, the conviction will stand up to the inevitable appeal. She will be serving a life sentence.