The needlessness of male circumcision: Scientific paper 2009 - Circumcision is not mandatory in penile surgery and circumcision should not be considered as a routine part of penile surgery - St. Peter’s Department Centre and the Institute of Urology, London, UK, and *Universita Vita Salute, San Raffaele - Hospital, Milan, Italy : onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08763.x/pdf Denmark 2014 study - The cumulative risk of undergoing circumcision before 18 years of age was 0.4% (meaning not necessarily that it was done to a baby and the article is from 2014, now we have more medicine on the market, thus more alternatives, also it is from 2014, lot more medicine is on the market, and thus lots of more alternatives and many of these circumcision within this 0.4% could have happened much earlier when there were no alternatives to circumcision) www.littleimages.org/blog/class-is-in-session/circumcision-statistics/ Study 1980 - In Finland the rate of post-neonatal circumcision was one in sixteenthousand six hundred sixty-seven men (1/16,667), 0.006%. Wallerstein E. Circumcision: An American Health Fallacy, 1980 www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/info/physiciansguide.html
You crack me up dude.... love your angle on all the concepts you joke about....
are kidding? this is true comedy! laughing so hard right now!
Your the best Tahir :)
HAHAHAHA, GOLD. GOOD ON YOU TAHIR. KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK.
I'm so happy this guy coming to my school tommrrow
good work tahir
Who is he?
Australian Turkish entertainer
@@waelal-buseri7037 Wow !! Got my answer after 6 years !! 😂 Thanks bud !! 👍
The needlessness of male circumcision:
Scientific paper 2009 - Circumcision is not mandatory in penile surgery and circumcision should not be considered as a routine part of penile surgery - St. Peter’s Department Centre and the Institute of Urology, London, UK, and *Universita Vita Salute, San Raffaele - Hospital, Milan, Italy :
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08763.x/pdf
Denmark 2014 study - The cumulative risk of undergoing circumcision before 18 years of age was 0.4% (meaning not necessarily that it was done to a baby and the article is from 2014, now we have more medicine on the market, thus more alternatives, also it is from 2014, lot more medicine is on the market, and thus lots of more alternatives and many of these circumcision within this 0.4% could have happened much earlier when there were no alternatives to circumcision) www.littleimages.org/blog/class-is-in-session/circumcision-statistics/
Study 1980 - In Finland the rate of post-neonatal circumcision was one in sixteenthousand six hundred sixty-seven men (1/16,667), 0.006%.
Wallerstein E. Circumcision: An American Health Fallacy, 1980
www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/info/physiciansguide.html
so which was the funny part?