Simon Rattle on Pierre Boulez

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 31 พ.ค. 2024
  • Visit us on: musiksalon.universaledition.com/
    Besuchen Sie uns auf: musiksalon.universaledition.com/
  • เพลง

ความคิดเห็น • 37

  • @PeterFink-xk6pw
    @PeterFink-xk6pw 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I was honoured to be a member of The National Youth orchestra during the period in 1977 described in the video starting at 5’ 34”. I remember that we recorded The Rite of Spring at Goldsmith’s College with Sir Simon, and then Boulez arrived. We were all in awe of him, but he was such a decent and down-to-earth man that we quickly became comfortable with his relaxed but effective style. His knowledge and understanding of the music was profound. As Sir Simon relates, Boulez pulled apart the Stravinsky and built it up again. He had that style of using the tonic sol-fa very rapidly when he was talking to us about a particular set of notes. We also did the Berg violin concerto with Yitzhak Perlman. What most impressed me about Boulez was his quiet modesty. During the day we had sectional rehearsals, but would meet at the end of the day during the residential course at 5 pm for a 2 hour full rehearsal. Whenever the conductor came into the hall, the orchestra would stand. When the second rehearsal with Boulez came round he politely asked us not to bother. He just wanted to get straight into the music. He was a consummate musician.

  • @xavierlemblun8446
    @xavierlemblun8446 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ah cela fait du bien d entendre un tel hommage du grand musicien qu etait Mr Pierre Boulez...

  • @PianistDanielFritzen
    @PianistDanielFritzen 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thank you

  • @khbgkh
    @khbgkh 9 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Amazing.

  • @danfriend9567
    @danfriend9567 8 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    I didn't know Bea Arthur knew so much about Boulez.

    • @leoserrrao
      @leoserrrao 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +Daniel Friend I never laughed so much with a comment like I did now. LOL

    • @JohnBolender
      @JohnBolender 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      "And Then There's Maude" was sung by Boulez. Check the credits.

    • @Mackeson3
      @Mackeson3 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Funny that, you never see Bea Arthur and Simon Rattle in the same room do you?

    • @teebeedahbow
      @teebeedahbow ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you for being a friend.

  • @PK-re3lu
    @PK-re3lu 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Just listened to 37mins of PB. I wonder how many listen to this music? I like S Rattle a lot, but found the praise in this interview overblown... Everything is wonderful today etc etc.

    • @laurencedankel4751
      @laurencedankel4751 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Wow! You listened a whole 37 minutes! What dedication to understanding something you will never understand!

    • @nandocordeiro5853
      @nandocordeiro5853 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It's a very futile effort. At least you tried to understand it.

    • @bensmith4827
      @bensmith4827 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      On the contrary, he has always struck me as highly accessible as a composer (for the most part). I suspect some just don't care for the extreme seriousness of his public persona and the concomitant intimidation that seems to present for listeners who prefer perhaps the more unctuous discourse surrounding postminimalism, postmodernism post.... whatever else

  • @TheCinemasound
    @TheCinemasound 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Look at him reading from a script!!

    • @mrnarason
      @mrnarason 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Phantom Of The Opera?? He's just looking down

    • @nandocordeiro5853
      @nandocordeiro5853 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@mrnarason He's a conductor, all he does is read from a script.

  • @Bashkii
    @Bashkii 5 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Boulez was a great analyst,great conductor and a mediocre composer. Serialism is no more than a useless extrapolation of the 12 tone system.
    The entire Darmstadt school was a bunch of arrogant and condescending composers that were convinced they were the iluminatti.
    I believe Serialism IS a dark period in music history.

    • @ivanbotaro4697
      @ivanbotaro4697 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      It seem you have no idea of what are you talking about...Boulez just compose 1 serialist work in his lifetime, then he move in another direction that obviously you don t get it...at least can you tell me of which I m talking about?

    • @KinkyLettuce
      @KinkyLettuce 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ivanbotaro4697 what do you even mean by only 1 serialist work? Do you not count the rest of his "total" serialist works? Polyphonie X, musique concrète études, Structures I & II are all serialist works.
      I dont know man, sounds like you are the one who has no idea what you are talking about

    • @ivanbotaro4697
      @ivanbotaro4697 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@KinkyLettuce Ok, I ve forgot Polyphonie X...I ll count two then...

    • @KinkyLettuce
      @KinkyLettuce 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@ivanbotaro4697 nah, you still dont know what you are talking about

    • @ivanbotaro4697
      @ivanbotaro4697 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@KinkyLettuce le notations, le marteau, anthemes, derive, repons, etc...Are serialists works for you? I think he s portrayed as an central figure of serialism, but After the total serialism experiment of structures he abandoned that very quickly, maybe it sound all same to you, but their compositions are very different from each other...

  • @nandocordeiro5853
    @nandocordeiro5853 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Boulez = Bad

    • @ntodd4110
      @ntodd4110 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Your Opinion = Irrelevant

    • @Bilmonis
      @Bilmonis ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Easy lazy bad comment

    • @cometcourse381
      @cometcourse381 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      You = Silly