Fusion360 to FreeCAD for CNC and CAD / CAM to LinuxCNC with the Path workbench

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 29

  • @eskibrew
    @eskibrew 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great to see you using FreeCAD. I've used it for years with my Denford Triac milling machine (also via LinuxCNC) and I really like it. Now subscribed.

  • @PowerElectronic
    @PowerElectronic 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You are doing the right thing. Thank you for helping others not to become dependent on privative software.

  • @davidapp3730
    @davidapp3730 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nice to see positive comments on Free Cad. I use it and am having a hard time getting a handle on it due to my lack of Cad experience. I am getting better slowly.

  • @carlslater7492
    @carlslater7492 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Version 1.0 production release of FreeCAD is hopefully in the next few weeks. I have been running the release candidates for the last few months, it is quite stable. You mention adaptive cutting, which is great ... but FreeCAD also picks up REST machining 😎, one of my personal favorites.
    Also, you will find the sketcher gets a lot of love in this version, ... though resolving missing constraints is a issue no matter which CAD package you use.

    • @myengines2443
      @myengines2443  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I read a bit about 1.0 and I am very curious about it!
      Thanks!

  • @oidkqw
    @oidkqw 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It's nice to see you back at the Stirling engine! I'd be interested to see a video on the heat exchangers, and on the thermodynamic cycles. I see you did some FEM CAE for those, that'd be really interesting to hear about, especially if you did it in FreeCAD.

    • @myengines2443
      @myengines2443  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      When the new drive works satisfying I will focus on the heat exchangers and report about them in detail.
      This includes the calculation with the similarity methods of Dr. Allan Organ and the final production with my pulse EDM.
      I made the FEA with Ansys and will show this too if you are interested.

    • @oidkqw
      @oidkqw 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@myengines2443 Definitely! I have seen glimpses of a PV diagram in your videos, and it would be awesome if those measurements validated the FEA, especially if there is a CFD simulation of the cycle. A very high bar, I realize! But it would bring the engineering full circle (cycle) :)

  • @gryzman
    @gryzman 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    nice, I am too confused about origins and things in FreeCAD, so maybe a video where you go through how you solved things - would be good!

    • @myengines2443
      @myengines2443  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Hi, if I find time I will try, thanks.

  • @zaitcev0
    @zaitcev0 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I don't understand how the part is clamped around 05:30 and beyond. It looks like magic.

    • @myengines2443
      @myengines2443  24 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      It is clamped with sunk screws to the milling table!

  • @Skyliptor
    @Skyliptor 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video. You can also try version 0.22, it's in development, they added a lot of features there, especially in the Sketcher workbench. There is also FreeCAD Link Branch

    • @myengines2443
      @myengines2443  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      When they make it a stable version I will try, thanks.

  • @mikasivula654
    @mikasivula654 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    For the path, I'll just hide the original model and show the path model, then it's ok. I've just had my mill into working condition so I've got only little experience with path. I made the switch from f360 to FreeCAD when the first limitations came and only thing that I miss is a good assembly constraints -now I'm going with in-place design with multiple level containers for moving parts in groups..

    • @myengines2443
      @myengines2443  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That sounds nice, thanks for your comment and tip!

    • @HenrikSyvertsen
      @HenrikSyvertsen 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Check out ondsel’s lates build, Ondsel ES for the upcoming integrated assembler

    • @myengines2443
      @myengines2443  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@HenrikSyvertsen
      That really looks nice, Freecad 1.0 would also sound amazing, thx for your comment...

  • @MJohnRupert
    @MJohnRupert 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for the post.

    • @myengines2443
      @myengines2443  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your nice comment!

  • @AG-sy4wt
    @AG-sy4wt 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    how are you supposed to clean up the part there is extra material on the sides.. the profile will do the exterior but the actual face even with extra material allowance doesnt quite clean my edges

    • @myengines2443
      @myengines2443  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I don't think I understand exactly what you mean.
      Sometimes you have to add a finishing cycle or adjust the cutter radius.
      Can you explain in more detail what you mean exactly?

  • @SW-qr8qe
    @SW-qr8qe 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks!

  • @wayne851
    @wayne851 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    FreeCAD still has the Topology naming problem (th-cam.com/video/QSsVFu929jo/w-d-xo.html) I hope its not that important for you work

    • @myengines2443
      @myengines2443  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, I know about this fundamental problem, you always have to have it in mind when designing...

    • @carlslater7492
      @carlslater7492 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@myengines2443 First ALL CAD packages have issues with Topology naming problem (TNP for short). I say this having written software for Unigraphics & Catia. As of version 0.22 and later MOST of the TNP has been mitigated.... which is the same reply the big boys would make.

  • @fd15k
    @fd15k 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    FreeCAD is full of bugs and is overloaded with features to the point of them making things more difficult. It's certainly a software worth considering in the absence of a commercial CAD/CAM package, but don't get too excited.