Chemical Potential and Phase Equilibrium

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 12

  • @bryancruz2855
    @bryancruz2855 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Great explanation, sir! It was brief and clear. Thank you 😁

  • @rohinbardhan222
    @rohinbardhan222 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi, at around 8:06, why is dP = 0? Because from PV = nRT, dn might provoke a change in P.

    • @PhysicalChemistry
      @PhysicalChemistry  ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, it might, but we are considering conditions where T and P are held constant. This was specified (somewhat belatedly) @5:00 in the video

  • @abrarhasnai2510
    @abrarhasnai2510 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you very much for this helpful and clear video 💕

  • @captainamericawhyso5917
    @captainamericawhyso5917 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    When some moles of compound A of phase β move down to phase α why doesn't the pressure and temperature of each phase change?

    • @PhysicalChemistry
      @PhysicalChemistry  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We have made the assumption that everything is happening at constant T and P. So, as the molecules of A change phase, some heat is transferred to/from the surroundings to maintain equilibrium with the external T, and the volume of the container increases/decreases to maintain equilibrium with the external P

    • @captainamericawhyso5917
      @captainamericawhyso5917 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@PhysicalChemistry Thank you so much for taking the time to reply. I can understand now.🙂

  • @ishaan9017
    @ishaan9017 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Sir I have a doubt: If component A is in equilibrium across 2 phases then shouldn't the no. of moles of A in both phases remain constant and dn(A)=0?

    • @PhysicalChemistry
      @PhysicalChemistry  3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      You're right, if the system is in equilibrium, the concentration is not changing.
      But that doesn't stop us from asking the hypothetical question: *if* some A transferred from one phase to another, what *would* be the change in the Gibbs energy?
      Here's an analogy: suppose you have some f(x), and I tell you that the slope df/dx is 0 at the minimum of the function. This is true, even though there is only one point at the minimum, and when you're at the minimum x can't be changing (so dx must be 0).

    • @ishaan9017
      @ishaan9017 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@PhysicalChemistry Understood Sir✌