Fantastic test! Even if I already ordered "my" Duster Hybrid 140 because of the driving experience the Hybrid provides. This is really informative! Thank you very much!
Unbelivable, I just tried to find a such comparision, this video is perfect. I would like if you can make video also with speeds above 100km/h, about 120km/h because I also drive long distances with constant speed of 130kn/h with tempo, and this information would make me decide. I'm sure video would have lot of views, but thank you for this one!
You are right! But the decision making has been made even harder. As LPG is half the price, at 6L consumption, you'd have to calculate as in 3L But the rest is not that far away, 3.6 and 4.2.. Honestly the 130 Tce seems to be the winner for me
@@1001cars of course not... for primarily city driving there are so called "city cars", there is public transport, etc... You buy Duster to go beyond the city... Duster is perfect to take your family to the seaside, to go camping, to transport your bike... Or not? For 90% city driving I would buy a small car like Citroen C3 or sth like that.
I found this video during search, went through other test (e-2008, civic, qashqai, yaris cross from my memory) Your videos are certainly informative and definitely deserve a sub. ✅ Thank you 🙏
Thank you for your work, it's cool to see how do different powertrains perform on a same route, same driver, economy wise. Looking forward for another test that would illustrate how much do they consume in a less suburban/rural environment, as - let's put it out straight - favors any kind of fuel consumption test, as it doesn't include a long enough highway scenario, nor denser city traffic. Nevertheless, it is what I was looking for (your comparison) and that kind of content is very rare. Kudos!
Excellent test, merci. Le gaz consomme plus mais à +/- 0,65 euro le litre pour +/- 1,65 euros le litre pour l'essence, il reste très compétitif. Sans compter la différence de prix du Duster entre gaz et hybrid. 😉
Je roule en Duster 3 depuis 10 jours. C'est un peu tôt pour se faire une opinion mais pour le moment je suis ravi. Ce n'est pas une Formule 1 mais pour aller du point A au point B en respectant le code de la route c'est parfait. Le turbo rentre rapidement en action et donne de bonnes sensations. A suivre...
I'm a little disappointed with the LPG if I'm honest. The TCE130 and 140 achieved extremely good results. The difference isn't that big. Is the extra cost justified? My choice would be the TCE130, this test confirmed that. Thanks for the very clear test drive.
Better 4x4 sistem, better suspension, all new platform the duster 3, compared with the duster 2. Make a drive test and see in the corners how stable its the car, its defenently something else the duster 3. And new, its almost the same price as duster 2 with low mileage. Soo the "what to buy" its straight forward.
Given the fact that LPG is more than half the price of petrol, the winner here is ECO-G 100 in terms of money. In terms of ecology, the winner is Hybrid 140
Does the Eco-g 6.0L/100km test run only in LPG fuel or is it combined with petrol? I'm trying to figure out the costs involved. In my area 10L of petrol costs about 18€ whereas 10L of LPG costs half the price, about 8€. Kudos for the video
Yo me he comprado el eco-g, motivos.... hago (ida y vuelta el kilometraje a lo que habría que añadir las vueltas en los viajes más largos de ese fin de semana o puente) 90km al día trabajo, fin de semana 170 ir chalet sierra y de vez en cuando voy hasta La Zenia 950 km chalet mis suegros, o casa mis padres en Castuera 740km... en fin, solo hiciera los 90 del trabajo hubiera sido el hybrid, si le pongo el traslado a El Espinar, tendría que hacer cuentas entre el Tce y el Hybrid, pues la subida puerto y velocidades medias trayecto se comería batería y el peso de esta tira en combustible, aunque el uso diario podría compensarlo, para Extremadura las cuentas serían entre el tce y el eco-g ya que no quiero tirar tanto de peso batería descargada, y ya teniendo en cuenta el viaje a Alicante el consumo extra de 200 kilos batería agotada es inasumible, por lo que dadas cuentas y que mis traslados al trabajo son por radiales, y que por mismo trabajo en ocasiones puntuales tengo que desplazarme a las sucursales en Manises en Valencia, 700Km, Barna (Barcelona ) 1250 km y Porriño (Pontevedra) 1200km, pues esta claro el porque de mi elección aparte del deteriodo baterías con un uso tan intensivo que hace que cada 10 años más o menos cambie de vehículo; tengo compañeros taxistas usan todos ellos el eléctrico puro (salvo uno no tiene donde poner punto carga al igual que yo) pues hacen una media de 300Km al día trayectos cortos (una carrera larga es inviable por puntos de carga a no ser sea muy temprano y la batería este a full) y les compensa el ahorro combustible con la diferencia precio auto, eso sí, antes cambiaban vehículo más o menos cada 6.7 años por deterioro y desgaste mecánica y me comentan que el eléctrico será más o menos a los 5 por no solo mecánica, sino el deteriodo batería, pero dado su trabajo, distancias realizadas y ahorro combustible les compensa el eléctrico, es el para que quieres el vehículo y espectro en general de su uso más que otra cosa lo que debe hacer elegir un tipo de motor u otro y las características de este y no un número en una tabla de excel 🐻
Great video. Is there a lot of differences between 1.2 and 1.0 LPG engines in the terms of acceleration and smoothness of the drive? Does 1.0 LPG have enough power for everyday drive when the AC is on?
1.2 TCe is much smoother and accelerates better because of the Mild Hybrid system. Both engines are enough strong to drive with AC active, but of course it depends on the number of passengers inside and outside temperature.
My problem with gas version is the motor. 1.0 with 100cv for this vehicle, seems short. Any opinions on this? Would it be a problem even for a driver who doesnt drive too fast?
If you think of using it mainly in an urban context I believe could be ok, but if you think of driving it with 4 people on board on mountains road with a full boot maybe could be better the hybrid one. Even for consumption and stress, in the second context, could be better for the engine the more powerful one!
@@adrianbantinesti9219 thx for your reply. I just need it to be more economic that my current car, and doing the math, lpg version is, even if I extend consume to 8.0... for that I even get a family car with good specs. Im just worried about the power of the engine, thats the only thing that is keeping me.
Do you think the lpg version has enough power to overtake safely? Or will it take forever? Also, it seems to me that all of the circuit you did was on flat roads. Do you think the lpg has enough stamina when the road starts to steepen? Thanks in advance
@@andredias8934 this engine options are confirmed? This LPG car seems to be a very nice option but Im afraid of the motor power in the situations @macdrago1 said: overtaking or steep roads. You have this same engine on inferior and much lighter models
@@hugooliveira1870 У меня авто с малым двигателем, обгон это кошмар, лучше не рисковать или переходишь на третью передачу и газу газу. А так же в горку приходиться переходить на понижение передачи. Для города идеальный вариант, а если в отпуск пару раз году ездить ,а остальное время город, то рекомендую.
Really good comparisons!! It makes even harder to decide😅😅 Considering longevity do you think full hybrid would last longer, considering much lower ICE usage? I am considering the Duster mainly for suburban roads
Thank you :) Petrol engine maybe yes, but at the same time we have to remember that we have additional battery, special gearbox etc. Also: not everyone like how this hybrid works, the best way is to check it on the test drive :)
@@1001carsI agree with you. Every hybrid works in a different way, even toyota one isn’t good for many people. I got a Yaris Cross and I'm happy with it. Dacia has got the renault one which works differently because it doesn’t have the ecvt, but it got some gear for the electric engine snd some for the mechanical one
You can watch the video, I show there how to drive efficiently :) About highway: I will try to find time and money to make such test, similar to my other reviews (three different speeds + city).
@theanswer1993 I tested one last week. For 270km one way and back, 98% highway with moderate saturday traffic i managed 5.7l/100km. With speed around 110-120 cruise control and max 140 when overtaking. Thing is, there is no noise from the engine even at high speeds, but the wind noise after 130 is a bit too loud. Thats because the front windshield is more upright than the last model. It has more of a suv feel rather than a lifted hatch. And the test vehicle was 4x4. Hope this helps 😊
@@Amazin040 5.7L is pretty acceptable for a car with 4x4 and squared like a brick. What kind of consumptions do you get in 90kph roads? Is it a good daily driver as a main car? Looks pretty cheap to run taking into consideration what it offers!
@@anonimxsidecas with autopilot the engine shuts off a lot. Its a mild hybrid, not as economical as the full or a plugin hybrid. The highest constant i saw was 6.7, but it was a long hill on the highway. With low speeds, it drops to 5-5.3. It was a bit windy and outside temp was 36-37 degrees. Its made for country roads (70-90km max). Thats where this cheap suv shines. Like i said, i wanted to see highway engine performance. So i mainly tested there. Also, i ordered mine today 😁 I live in a rural area, where roads are mirages and in the winter you need capable cars. So for those roads and a little highway drive each month, its 👌. My parents have the old one, bought last year. It does everything perfectly. Cost to run and buy is super low. I also tested rivals such as the Vitara and Tucson, they are more expensive and performed worse(which doesn’t make sense really). So, to answer your question, consumption should be low for those roads and its a decent everyday car. You should go and test one, im sure all dealers have the model now ( :
@@Amazin040 Thank you man, I gave you the thumbs up but you deserve a well mannered thanks! Enjoy the car if you end up buying it, it looks amazing and it's a good bank for the buck!
How much fuel mild hybrid saves compared to regular car with the same engine? In your experience. And what car has the most effective mild hybrid system?
Jakie to ma znaczenie? :) Liczy się pomiar od skasowania. Jak robię testy autostradowe: 90, 120 i później 140 km/h, to nie gaszę silnika pomiędzy testami i wówczas średnia "od uruchomienia" jest średnią ze wszystkich przejazdów + dojazd + zawrotki. Ma to jakąkolwiek wartość? To prezentacja samochodu, na której wielu dziennikarzy jeździło tymi autami, zgarnąłem auto zaraz po kimś innym. Nie mam zielonego pojęcia jak ten ktoś jeździł. Tamten licznik (od uruchomienia) kasuje się dopiero po kilku/kilkunastu minutach od zgaszenia.
@@1001cars spokojnie… pytam tylko bo zamówiłem taki samochód kilka dni temu , bede jeździł , robił zawrotki, dojazdy itd i właśnie ma to dla mnie jakąkolwiek wartość. Zapytałem czy to spalanie wynikalo z wczesniejszych testow czy tylko Twojej jazdy… tyle. Test fajny, dzieki
@@jurito84 a będziesz robił zawrotki dokładnie po 33 km na dokładnie takim samym dystansie, później ponownie 33 km przy innej prędkości i ponownie zawrotka? Wątpliwe :) Nawet jeśli wynikałoby z wcześniejszych testów, to nie są one opisane/wskazane - równie dobrze mogłem sprawdzać przyspieszenie tego samochodu, jeździć po torze sprawnościowym itp :)
@@1001cars zrobiłeś świetne porównanie , zapytałem jedynie o to skąd to 7/100 - nic więcej . Odpowiedź " z testów wykonanych przed moimi jazdami " wystarczyłaby w 100 % ...
@@jurito84 jasne, i tak bardzo dobrze że pytasz :) Po prostu znakomita większość innych czytających/oglądających dorabia sobie jakąś historię do takiego wyniku. Pozdrawiam :)
Interesuję się hybrydami Toyoty, więc się zdziwiłem, że przez większość czasu użył Pan trybu B zamiast D w hybrydowym Dusterze. Ciekawe, jakie byłoby zużycie tylko przy trybie D. 😁 Czy w Dusterze tryb B hamuje głównie silnikiem tak jak w hybrydach Toyoty?
Tryb B w hybrydach (HEV) Toyoty, a tryb B w hybrydzie Renault to dwie osobne kwestie i nie należy ich porównywać. Dostosowując styl jazdy w trybie D będzie takie samo zużycie jak w B.
It depends on the LPG price in your country. Also: you do not drive only on LPG and probably you have additional cost just because your car has second fuel installation.
@@1001cars in Latvia for example, we even get lower car tax for LPG because it burns cleaner. LPG is 0.67 Eur/L, petrol 1.60Eur/L, so it is quite cheaper to run on LPG. I have a Jogger with 1.0l engine, and it's weak, especially if you need to tow a trailer. For Duster with bigger wheels, i guess it will feel even less dynamic. You don't need to fill the petrol so often, i get 1 full petrol tank per 7-8 months of using the car on LPG, 20kkm/year. Would be great to have 1.2 LPG version, as an SUV with 1.0l 3 cyl sounds funny.
For comparasion between 1.2 Tce 130 4.2l/100 km vs 6.0l/100km (ECO-G 100 LPG) You drive 150.000k with the car, petrol is $2/l and LPG $0.66/l After 150k you spend in total $5900 on LPG But on the 1.2 Tce Mild Hybrid, you spend $12.600, which is more than LPG with $6700
well, what can I say, nice effort and there is value in comparing the three....BUT, real life consumptions are certainly higher than these.....on my 4x4 110 dci, average difference between ECU calculated consumption and real one (diesel I have to fill in on gas station) is between 0.7 and 1 liter/100km......and I do keep record of every topping up...now being at 165000 km 😎...and I drive pretty conservative 😇
@@1001cars whatever you say....I am absolutely sure (to the deciliter) how much diesel I poured in during these 165 000+ km and 5 years and Medianav calculated consumption NEVER showed more than 5-5,2 l/100 km...(whilst in actuality it is around 5,6-5,8 l/100)...most commonly it writes around 4,7 l/100 ......anyhow, I don't wish to spoil the wonderful feeling of thousands of Duster drivers with their low consumption rates....because THEY REALLY ARE LOW ......(just not THAT low 😇😉)
@@salmothymus Whatever you say... you experience is about diesel engine, and here we are talking about petrol engines... You could answer normally and nicely, but you did not. I did not say that for sure there is no difference (I said, I will be surprised if the difference will be large - based on my experience), but you really want to convince everybody that numbers shown on the dash for sure are not accurate JUST BECAUSE your old car with other & older engine has such situation. Think about it.
@@1001cars again, it is not about modern or not so modern cars that I commented, it is more on the skewed consumption rates "modern" cars (ECU's) report to their drivers. In this particular case it is the MediaNav of Dacia Dusters. I appreciate your replies and comments (sorry for sounding offensive, that was absolutely not my intention) but my point is that these figures are NOT accurate ....and, to wrap it up, you wrote that "the biggest difference which I noticed in modern cars was no larger than 5%". Have you EVER noticed the difference of calculated versus real consumption skewed in a POSITIVE sense (larger than in reality) 😁 ???
@@salmothymus Again: you are constantly trying to convince that these Dacia cars with petrol engines reports wrong fuel consumption JUST BECAUSE your older model with diesel engine does that. Why? Did you check it? If no, you can undermine the results shown by computer but you CANNOT be sure that these results are wrong, what you are doing. Yes, I had few situations where the consumption showed by computer was LARGER than in reality. It is enough to check my other fuel consumption videos.
If you want to get a real consumption, go on the highway at 130 km/h, and you will be shocked when you see consumptions of over 7.5 l/100 with all engines. So, at bicycle speeds and on the open road, even with my 20-year-old Logan, I consume less than 5l/100km.
What I showed is REAL consumption, but not in scenario which you THINK is real, especially if you cannot drive faster than 120 km/h (because of the speed limits). Also: show me how you drive over 90 km/h on a bicycle :)
And that's not even true, the sweet spot for engines is 90kmh to achieve the best consumption. Low speeds are more ineficient and more if you have to brake and accelerate constantly, which is the case in the video. So the fact that he achieved 4,2L with the 1.2L micro hybrid is pretty reasonable and shows that driving efficiently and using the brain can get you excelent numers. Obviously if you drive at 130kmh (a really inneficient speed for any car), the consumption will be higher, but another used tested it and said that the consumption was at 5,7L x 100km after 270km. So yes, this car is efficient, and if you drive it efficiently, it can get you the numbers shown in the video under REAL circumstances and constant acceleration and braking. Good job @1001cars!
Cool test....but I have duster eco-g and real fuel consumpsion LPG is always 11 liters in city and 9 liters over city... hiway dynamic ride 13 liters...😂😂😂
@@1001cars Over short Distances small influences will have a big influence on the displayed amount. And I am not even talking about, that the Bordcomputer can be up to 0,5l inaccurate. One heave acceleration and you get a whole other number. Theres a reason why most real test are performed for about 300km. Small influences will get cancelled out and the real consumption can be calculated. I know a lot of TCe 130 owners and no one gets really a 4.2l / 100km consumption. Most are at about 6 to 6.5l. If you are driving really slow and careful maybe 5.7 or something. Thats what I mean, 30km driving around some countryroads is way to inaccurate, even for the trip computer to tell
So, show me REPETEABLE test on 300 km distance. Like, sb. made 3 or even more runs with exact the same number. So, send the link to these "most real test on ~300 km distance", but remember, these test should be repeated with the same result. Longer distance = more situations which can influence the final result. I made many times the test on 33 distance (this is my typical highway distance) and on the 100 km distance and on the 200 km distance. The result was exactly the same - of course I had to make such test early morning when there was no traffic at all. At least here you see if there was sth. was wrong with the traffic, unnecessary acceleration or anything like that. Can you show me similar movies from 300 km distance? Second thing: yes, board computer can show incorrect consumption, but if you were present on the math lessons, you know that it is not inaccurate by 0,5 l/100 km (or anything precise number) but by some percent. So, there is no difference between 2% error on 4,5 l/100 km on 30 km distance and 2% error on 4,5 l/100 km on 300 km distance in terms of the difference between board computer and consumption on the fuel station. If sb. does not know how to drive in eco way, it is not the reason why you can call my test inaccurate or unreal. You even did not check what scenario of driving did they have etc. And you are trying to compare SOME consumption (without any kind of info about driving style etc.) with the consumption shown in this video with specified every detail including recorded every meter of the trip. Explain, how is it possible: Kona on ~400 km distance and the same Kona on 30 km distance th-cam.com/video/EIK7ebW5K2U/w-d-xo.html | th-cam.com/video/3DGUEjMMnjE/w-d-xo.html ID.4 on over 500 km distance: th-cam.com/video/548t8mBbfdo/w-d-xo.html and on 22 km distance: th-cam.com/video/UqfQB3BKkog/w-d-xo.html
@@1001cars absolutely no problem. Look at these guys, unfortunately German but they have lots of cars which they test on 300km and make with each car 3 runs. One at 80km/h, one at 130km/h and one at full speed: th-cam.com/video/1L21yV1jv-Q/w-d-xo.html
absolutely no problem, you did not send any answer to my questions. This movie is good, but it proves what I said, not what you said :) 1st: there is no 3 runs on the same test, only one run, we do not know they repeatability (they even talk about it and they know they cannot make exactly the same test with exactly the same result again) 2nd: they achieved 4,1 l/100 km with the TCe engine which - as you said - is impossible, and "no one gets really a 4,2/100 km", here they got 4,1, so even better. So?
![เจ็บที่ยังฮัก - ม่อน วรวิทย์ [ Official Mv ] จอนนี่มิวสิค](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/KALIGSRSjFs/mqdefault.jpg)
LPG wins because it costs half as much as petrol xD jokes aside, your tests are still amazing. Your work is appreciated.
Fantastic test! Even if I already ordered "my" Duster Hybrid 140 because of the driving experience the Hybrid provides. This is really informative! Thank you very much!
I don t have the money for one , but seems a good car
Unbelivable, I just tried to find a such comparision, this video is perfect. I would like if you can make video also with speeds above 100km/h, about 120km/h because I also drive long distances with constant speed of 130kn/h with tempo, and this information would make me decide. I'm sure video would have lot of views, but thank you for this one!
I am going to make similar video in other scenarios, highway included, like I do usually :)
Dzięki, super robota.Pełen profesjonalizm.Powinieneś być dobrze opłacanym kierowcą testowym u Dacii.
Best comparision ever for people who cannot decide which powertrain option in new Duster, thanks!
EDIT: Would love to see highway only consumption too
I will try to find the time and money to make such test.
My average speed is 80-90 km/h... This was a 45 km/h average speed. So... Not a real life test for my kind of driving, unfortunately.
So, you do not drive in a city at all, right?
You are right! But the decision making has been made even harder. As LPG is half the price, at 6L consumption, you'd have to calculate as in 3L
But the rest is not that far away, 3.6 and 4.2..
Honestly the 130 Tce seems to be the winner for me
@@1001cars of course not... for primarily city driving there are so called "city cars", there is public transport, etc... You buy Duster to go beyond the city... Duster is perfect to take your family to the seaside, to go camping, to transport your bike... Or not? For 90% city driving I would buy a small car like Citroen C3 or sth like that.
I found this video during search, went through other test (e-2008, civic, qashqai, yaris cross from my memory)
Your videos are certainly informative and definitely deserve a sub. ✅
Thank you 🙏
Thank you for time. Very interesting and informative comparison 👍🏻 Thank you very much ✌🏻👏🏻
Top comparison!!
Super test jestem pod wrażeniem, dobra robota .Było by dobrze zobaczyć taki test tylko na autostradzie, jakie jest spalanie .
So much effort was given here in comparison to all other nonsene car reviewers. Thank you.
Excellent video. Especially liked the GoPro view showing the speed and fuel consumption.
Thank you for your work, it's cool to see how do different powertrains perform on a same route, same driver, economy wise. Looking forward for another test that would illustrate how much do they consume in a less suburban/rural environment, as - let's put it out straight - favors any kind of fuel consumption test, as it doesn't include a long enough highway scenario, nor denser city traffic. Nevertheless, it is what I was looking for (your comparison) and that kind of content is very rare. Kudos!
Thank you :) This is what I am going to do quite soon :)
Fajne 👌- pierwszy raz widzę takie zestawienie 3 różnych silników w jednym modelu
Very good video, thanks a lot, it demonstrates the efficiency of the Renault Petrol engines.
Dacia always mounted only dacia engines, hybrid tech is similar Porsche group, nothing to do with the brand you mentioned.
@@xSlavic ????????????????????????????????
@@xSlavic wtf ?
Simply top test.
This is great work!
Thanks for the test...it was exactly what I was looking for and now I'll be looking for the Duster 140 Hybrid....nice music as well!
Now that's proper testing. Excellent, thank you.
The test I've been searching for. Thanks!
Ale solidna robota ten test.
słaba średnia prędkość żeby realne spalanie wyszło
Fantastic
These are light traffic suburban roads. In big cities and on highway, consuption will be +1.5/2.0 liters
Excellent test, merci.
Le gaz consomme plus mais à +/- 0,65 euro le litre pour +/- 1,65 euros le litre pour l'essence, il reste très compétitif.
Sans compter la différence de prix du Duster entre gaz et hybrid.
😉
My problem with gas version is the motor. 1.0 with 100cv for this vehicle, seems short. Any opinions on this?
Je roule en Duster 3 depuis 10 jours. C'est un peu tôt pour se faire une opinion mais pour le moment je suis ravi.
Ce n'est pas une Formule 1 mais pour aller du point A au point B en respectant le code de la route c'est parfait.
Le turbo rentre rapidement en action et donne de bonnes sensations.
A suivre...
@@bensta60tu as pris le gpl ? Je vais l'essayer demain, je lis beaucoup de commentaires disant que le moteur est sous dimensionné
@@nicolasalimaThe engine is week for person's that came from powerful cars. For normal people is ok
@@bensta60 Здравствуйте , какой у вас мотор?
I'm a little disappointed with the LPG if I'm honest.
The TCE130 and 140 achieved extremely good results. The difference isn't that big. Is the extra cost justified?
My choice would be the TCE130, this test confirmed that.
Thanks for the very clear test drive.
Better 4x4 sistem, better suspension, all new platform the duster 3, compared with the duster 2.
Make a drive test and see in the corners how stable its the car, its defenently something else the duster 3.
And new, its almost the same price as duster 2 with low mileage. Soo the "what to buy" its straight forward.
@@tomhaws1765 I will...
Dziękuję, to bardzo pomocny film.
I never owned a Dacia, but Damn the new look attracts me 😅
LPG is best, because LPG is cheaper...
AZ * IGAZI HYBRID * !!! 🫡🫡🫡
Given the fact that LPG is more than half the price of petrol, the winner here is ECO-G 100 in terms of money. In terms of ecology, the winner is Hybrid 140
Jakby było LPG z automatem to idealne auto. Ja nie przeżyłbym jazdy manualem już
Top Video! and nice songs to perfect .
As for the driving experience, which was in your opinion the most enjoyable setup?
TCe
How about the 4x4?
great video !!! thanks !
Great video!Thanks for the info. It would be great if you could test the 4x4 version olso.😊
Does the Eco-g 6.0L/100km test run only in LPG fuel or is it combined with petrol? I'm trying to figure out the costs involved. In my area 10L of petrol costs about 18€ whereas 10L of LPG costs half the price, about 8€. Kudos for the video
It was LPG only :)
@@1001cars Thanks man
Very nice!
I'm waiting for mine.
Yo me he comprado el eco-g, motivos.... hago (ida y vuelta el kilometraje a lo que habría que añadir las vueltas en los viajes más largos de ese fin de semana o puente) 90km al día trabajo, fin de semana 170 ir chalet sierra y de vez en cuando voy hasta La Zenia 950 km chalet mis suegros, o casa mis padres en Castuera 740km... en fin, solo hiciera los 90 del trabajo hubiera sido el hybrid, si le pongo el traslado a El Espinar, tendría que hacer cuentas entre el Tce y el Hybrid, pues la subida puerto y velocidades medias trayecto se comería batería y el peso de esta tira en combustible, aunque el uso diario podría compensarlo, para Extremadura las cuentas serían entre el tce y el eco-g ya que no quiero tirar tanto de peso batería descargada, y ya teniendo en cuenta el viaje a Alicante el consumo extra de 200 kilos batería agotada es inasumible, por lo que dadas cuentas y que mis traslados al trabajo son por radiales, y que por mismo trabajo en ocasiones puntuales tengo que desplazarme a las sucursales en Manises en Valencia, 700Km, Barna (Barcelona ) 1250 km y Porriño (Pontevedra) 1200km, pues esta claro el porque de mi elección aparte del deteriodo baterías con un uso tan intensivo que hace que cada 10 años más o menos cambie de vehículo; tengo compañeros taxistas usan todos ellos el eléctrico puro (salvo uno no tiene donde poner punto carga al igual que yo) pues hacen una media de 300Km al día trayectos cortos (una carrera larga es inviable por puntos de carga a no ser sea muy temprano y la batería este a full) y les compensa el ahorro combustible con la diferencia precio auto, eso sí, antes cambiaban vehículo más o menos cada 6.7 años por deterioro y desgaste mecánica y me comentan que el eléctrico será más o menos a los 5 por no solo mecánica, sino el deteriodo batería, pero dado su trabajo, distancias realizadas y ahorro combustible les compensa el eléctrico, es el para que quieres el vehículo y espectro en general de su uso más que otra cosa lo que debe hacer elegir un tipo de motor u otro y las características de este y no un número en una tabla de excel 🐻
Perfect video
How good was the lpg version
Are 100hp enough for this car?
Great comparison!
if you want the automatic transmission the only possibility is hybrid 140.......
Good test and there was no speed control but I miss some miles on a Highway
Great video, well done 👏
How mutch cost the battery of hybrid models?
Great video. Is there a lot of differences between 1.2 and 1.0 LPG engines in the terms of acceleration and smoothness of the drive? Does 1.0 LPG have enough power for everyday drive when the AC is on?
1.2 TCe is much smoother and accelerates better because of the Mild Hybrid system. Both engines are enough strong to drive with AC active, but of course it depends on the number of passengers inside and outside temperature.
Gran trabajo 👍
My problem with gas version is the motor. 1.0 with 100cv for this vehicle, seems short. Any opinions on this? Would it be a problem even for a driver who doesnt drive too fast?
If you think of using it mainly in an urban context I believe could be ok, but if you think of driving it with 4 people on board on mountains road with a full boot maybe could be better the hybrid one. Even for consumption and stress, in the second context, could be better for the engine the more powerful one!
Dzieki za robote. Poszła łapa i zostawiam koments dla algorytmu👍 Mam jeszcze pytanie. To 1.2 to już na łańcuszku?
Yes. 1.2 has chain distribution....also lpg engine has chain distribution
@@adrianbantinesti9219 thx
@@adrianbantinesti9219 Sry, i dont understand much of mechanics of a car. Is that a good thing for the lpg engine?
@@hugooliveira1870If you don't understand just buy the car you like the most...100 HP it's enough for daily use...
@@adrianbantinesti9219 thx for your reply. I just need it to be more economic that my current car, and doing the math, lpg version is, even if I extend consume to 8.0... for that I even get a family car with good specs. Im just worried about the power of the engine, thats the only thing that is keeping me.
1001 what would you choose?
Do you think the lpg version has enough power to overtake safely? Or will it take forever? Also, it seems to me that all of the circuit you did was on flat roads. Do you think the lpg has enough stamina when the road starts to steepen? Thanks in advance
I have a jogger and it's fine, but you should do a test drive.
I have a previous version Duster Journey on LPG and you will be surprised of the power. This new version i will have in a few weeks. Completly back
@@EddyFeyen when possible give your feedback please... I guess that in 2025 it will be release 1.2 or 1.3 bifuel
@@andredias8934 this engine options are confirmed? This LPG car seems to be a very nice option but Im afraid of the motor power in the situations @macdrago1 said: overtaking or steep roads. You have this same engine on inferior and much lighter models
@@hugooliveira1870 У меня авто с малым двигателем, обгон это кошмар, лучше не рисковать или переходишь на третью передачу и газу газу. А так же в горку приходиться переходить на понижение передачи. Для города идеальный вариант, а если в отпуск пару раз году ездить ,а остальное время город, то рекомендую.
Really good comparisons!!
It makes even harder to decide😅😅
Considering longevity do you think full hybrid would last longer, considering much lower ICE usage?
I am considering the Duster mainly for suburban roads
Thank you :) Petrol engine maybe yes, but at the same time we have to remember that we have additional battery, special gearbox etc. Also: not everyone like how this hybrid works, the best way is to check it on the test drive :)
@@1001carsI agree with you. Every hybrid works in a different way, even toyota one isn’t good for many people. I got a Yaris Cross and I'm happy with it. Dacia has got the renault one which works differently because it doesn’t have the ecvt, but it got some gear for the electric engine snd some for the mechanical one
Damn 4.2 on tce 4x2! Teach me how? How much do you get if you mostly drive on highway?
You can watch the video, I show there how to drive efficiently :) About highway: I will try to find time and money to make such test, similar to my other reviews (three different speeds + city).
@theanswer1993 I tested one last week. For 270km one way and back, 98% highway with moderate saturday traffic i managed 5.7l/100km. With speed around 110-120 cruise control and max 140 when overtaking. Thing is, there is no noise from the engine even at high speeds, but the wind noise after 130 is a bit too loud. Thats because the front windshield is more upright than the last model. It has more of a suv feel rather than a lifted hatch. And the test vehicle was 4x4. Hope this helps 😊
@@Amazin040 5.7L is pretty acceptable for a car with 4x4 and squared like a brick. What kind of consumptions do you get in 90kph roads? Is it a good daily driver as a main car? Looks pretty cheap to run taking into consideration what it offers!
@@anonimxsidecas with autopilot the engine shuts off a lot. Its a mild hybrid, not as economical as the full or a plugin hybrid. The highest constant i saw was 6.7, but it was a long hill on the highway. With low speeds, it drops to 5-5.3. It was a bit windy and outside temp was 36-37 degrees. Its made for country roads (70-90km max). Thats where this cheap suv shines. Like i said, i wanted to see highway engine performance. So i mainly tested there. Also, i ordered mine today 😁 I live in a rural area, where roads are mirages and in the winter you need capable cars. So for those roads and a little highway drive each month, its 👌. My parents have the old one, bought last year. It does everything perfectly. Cost to run and buy is super low. I also tested rivals such as the Vitara and Tucson, they are more expensive and performed worse(which doesn’t make sense really). So, to answer your question, consumption should be low for those roads and its a decent everyday car. You should go and test one, im sure all dealers have the model now ( :
@@Amazin040 Thank you man, I gave you the thumbs up but you deserve a well mannered thanks! Enjoy the car if you end up buying it, it looks amazing and it's a good bank for the buck!
The last car did you drive on LPG or on petrol ?
Like I wrote: on LPG
Please add fuel cost comparison. Duster ECO-G 100 consumes more but the fuel is cheaper (LPG)
Which country is the most important? Probably you know that every country has different prices.
@@1001cars any country would be ok. Now only comparable between are hybrids
Great comparison! Do you also have data for the 4x4 version on front wd? Thanks in advance
unfortunately not :( I did not have additional time during that day.
+22c outside. Meaning it's ideal weather conditions.
Perfect conditions are at different temperature :)
Was ist der Verbrauch beim TCe 130 4×4 ?
Put 1-1.5 liter more
I did not have additional time to make another test at that day.
How much fuel mild hybrid saves compared to regular car with the same engine? In your experience. And what car has the most effective mild hybrid system?
it depends on the scenario :) Find the car which is available with and without Mild Hybrid system and with exact the same engine :)
@@1001cars Let's say pure town driving.
@@dkdanis1340 Renault states that this micro hybrid can save up to 20% compared to non-hybrid cars. I think they might be right.
Also one question, do you feel LPG100 is noticeably underpowered comparing to tce130? Thx
Yes, the LPG 100 is significantly less strong, especially because TCe has Mild Hybrid system which helps at low rpms.
@@1001cars thanks !
@@1001cars LPG has a Mild Hybrid identical...
@@Muster-q9m No it doest NOT. Check the spec.
Why there is no hybrid 140 with all wheel drive??
There is no space for rear wheel drive elements. The battery is placed just next to rear axle
@@1001cars thats a shame :/ would be good choice
So, which one you recommend?
Do I know the fuel/gas price in your region? :) Do I know your driving scenario?
@@1001cars 1.9 eur/l , roads and country, 40000 km per year
@@1001cars 1,9eur/l, roads and country, 40000km per year
@@1001cars 1,9eur/l, roads and country, 40000km per year
11:00 widać spalanie 7/100 ( od uruchomienia ) Wynikało z wcześniejszych testów czy wyszło takie podczas Twojej jazdy ?
Jakie to ma znaczenie? :) Liczy się pomiar od skasowania. Jak robię testy autostradowe: 90, 120 i później 140 km/h, to nie gaszę silnika pomiędzy testami i wówczas średnia "od uruchomienia" jest średnią ze wszystkich przejazdów + dojazd + zawrotki. Ma to jakąkolwiek wartość? To prezentacja samochodu, na której wielu dziennikarzy jeździło tymi autami, zgarnąłem auto zaraz po kimś innym. Nie mam zielonego pojęcia jak ten ktoś jeździł. Tamten licznik (od uruchomienia) kasuje się dopiero po kilku/kilkunastu minutach od zgaszenia.
@@1001cars spokojnie… pytam tylko bo zamówiłem taki samochód kilka dni temu , bede jeździł , robił zawrotki, dojazdy itd i właśnie ma to dla mnie jakąkolwiek wartość. Zapytałem czy to spalanie wynikalo z wczesniejszych testow czy tylko Twojej jazdy… tyle. Test fajny, dzieki
@@jurito84 a będziesz robił zawrotki dokładnie po 33 km na dokładnie takim samym dystansie, później ponownie 33 km przy innej prędkości i ponownie zawrotka? Wątpliwe :)
Nawet jeśli wynikałoby z wcześniejszych testów, to nie są one opisane/wskazane - równie dobrze mogłem sprawdzać przyspieszenie tego samochodu, jeździć po torze sprawnościowym itp :)
@@1001cars zrobiłeś świetne porównanie , zapytałem jedynie o to skąd to 7/100 - nic więcej . Odpowiedź " z testów wykonanych przed moimi jazdami " wystarczyłaby w 100 % ...
@@jurito84 jasne, i tak bardzo dobrze że pytasz :) Po prostu znakomita większość innych czytających/oglądających dorabia sobie jakąś historię do takiego wyniku. Pozdrawiam :)
Interesuję się hybrydami Toyoty, więc się zdziwiłem, że przez większość czasu użył Pan trybu B zamiast D w hybrydowym Dusterze. Ciekawe, jakie byłoby zużycie tylko przy trybie D. 😁
Czy w Dusterze tryb B hamuje głównie silnikiem tak jak w hybrydach Toyoty?
Tryb B w hybrydach (HEV) Toyoty, a tryb B w hybrydzie Renault to dwie osobne kwestie i nie należy ich porównywać. Dostosowując styl jazdy w trybie D będzie takie samo zużycie jak w B.
Sooo finally what's cheapest😢way of dustering ?
lpg
lPG
LPG but weaker engine. I think 4x2 is a great compromise between fuel efficiency and performance.
It depends on the LPG price in your country. Also: you do not drive only on LPG and probably you have additional cost just because your car has second fuel installation.
@@1001cars in Latvia for example, we even get lower car tax for LPG because it burns cleaner. LPG is 0.67 Eur/L, petrol 1.60Eur/L, so it is quite cheaper to run on LPG. I have a Jogger with 1.0l engine, and it's weak, especially if you need to tow a trailer. For Duster with bigger wheels, i guess it will feel even less dynamic. You don't need to fill the petrol so often, i get 1 full petrol tank per 7-8 months of using the car on LPG, 20kkm/year. Would be great to have 1.2 LPG version, as an SUV with 1.0l 3 cyl sounds funny.
Great consumption if you stick to speed limit...but it was only one person in car,corect? Lpg for the prices today it will be the right choice...
Yes, only the driver. I could not find anyone who wanted to sit with me in every tested car :)
@@1001cars 😂😂😂😂 Bad friends do you have mate🤣. Except the ecology what engine impressed you most? In therm off guidance?Thx
For city I would take hybrid, but in general TCe with mild hybrid system works really good. LPG consumes too much in my opinion
@1001cars LPG consumes too much because ITS LPG and 1 liter of LPG costs 3 times LESS than 1 liter of petrol
For comparasion between 1.2 Tce 130 4.2l/100 km vs 6.0l/100km (ECO-G 100 LPG)
You drive 150.000k with the car, petrol is $2/l and LPG $0.66/l
After 150k you spend in total $5900 on LPG
But on the 1.2 Tce Mild Hybrid, you spend $12.600, which is more than LPG with $6700
The only thing that makes sense is how many €/100km. Supposing the worst price conditions. For gasoline and gas. Bue bye 🎉
well, what can I say, nice effort and there is value in comparing the three....BUT, real life consumptions are certainly higher than these.....on my 4x4 110 dci, average difference between ECU calculated consumption and real one (diesel I have to fill in on gas station) is between 0.7 and 1 liter/100km......and I do keep record of every topping up...now being at 165000 km 😎...and I drive pretty conservative 😇
Maybe yes, maybe not, I will check it soon. But the biggest difference which I noticed in modern cars was no larger than 5%.
@@1001cars whatever you say....I am absolutely sure (to the deciliter) how much diesel I poured in during these 165 000+ km and 5 years and Medianav calculated consumption NEVER showed more than 5-5,2 l/100 km...(whilst in actuality it is around 5,6-5,8 l/100)...most commonly it writes around 4,7 l/100 ......anyhow, I don't wish to spoil the wonderful feeling of thousands of Duster drivers with their low consumption rates....because THEY REALLY ARE LOW ......(just not THAT low 😇😉)
@@salmothymus Whatever you say... you experience is about diesel engine, and here we are talking about petrol engines...
You could answer normally and nicely, but you did not. I did not say that for sure there is no difference (I said, I will be surprised if the difference will be large - based on my experience), but you really want to convince everybody that numbers shown on the dash for sure are not accurate JUST BECAUSE your old car with other & older engine has such situation. Think about it.
@@1001cars again, it is not about modern or not so modern cars that I commented, it is more on the skewed consumption rates "modern" cars (ECU's) report to their drivers. In this particular case it is the MediaNav of Dacia Dusters. I appreciate your replies and comments (sorry for sounding offensive, that was absolutely not my intention) but my point is that these figures are NOT accurate ....and, to wrap it up, you wrote that "the biggest difference which I noticed in modern cars was no larger than 5%". Have you EVER noticed the difference of calculated versus real consumption skewed in a POSITIVE sense (larger than in reality) 😁 ???
@@salmothymus Again: you are constantly trying to convince that these Dacia cars with petrol engines reports wrong fuel consumption JUST BECAUSE your older model with diesel engine does that. Why? Did you check it? If no, you can undermine the results shown by computer but you CANNOT be sure that these results are wrong, what you are doing. Yes, I had few situations where the consumption showed by computer was LARGER than in reality. It is enough to check my other fuel consumption videos.
If you want to get a real consumption, go on the highway at 130 km/h, and you will be shocked when you see consumptions of over 7.5 l/100 with all engines. So, at bicycle speeds and on the open road, even with my 20-year-old Logan, I consume less than 5l/100km.
What I showed is REAL consumption, but not in scenario which you THINK is real, especially if you cannot drive faster than 120 km/h (because of the speed limits). Also: show me how you drive over 90 km/h on a bicycle :)
And that's not even true, the sweet spot for engines is 90kmh to achieve the best consumption. Low speeds are more ineficient and more if you have to brake and accelerate constantly, which is the case in the video. So the fact that he achieved 4,2L with the 1.2L micro hybrid is pretty reasonable and shows that driving efficiently and using the brain can get you excelent numers. Obviously if you drive at 130kmh (a really inneficient speed for any car), the consumption will be higher, but another used tested it and said that the consumption was at 5,7L x 100km after 270km. So yes, this car is efficient, and if you drive it efficiently, it can get you the numbers shown in the video under REAL circumstances and constant acceleration and braking. Good job @1001cars!
@@anonimxsidecas This Duster has the aerodynamic efficiency of a brick, that's why it burns much more fuel at highway speed.
@@GabrielVoinea much more fuel is 5.7L at 110kmh. Do you consider that inneficient?
Way way overpriced
too bad test was done with such a low avg speed.
Too bad comment, without understanding what is the speed limit on roads
@@1001cars you got 50km/h countrywide on all roads?
@@1001cars more practical fuel consumption would be with avg speed around at least 60-70km/h
Look again on this roads and tell me where I could drive faster without speeding.
Show me such avg. speed with city and villages included.
Метан лучше
but not from rus sia
@@marekgot9837 why?
Cool test....but I have duster eco-g and real fuel consumpsion LPG is always 11 liters in city and 9 liters over city... hiway dynamic ride 13 liters...😂😂😂
Fuel consumption depends in the driving style and type of traffic :)
Yes offcourse :) but in normal dynamic drive it is like im writing😂😂😂 maby Your style driving is lake old man 😂😂😂😂 beter stay at home😂😂😂
@@Marcin-fi6xj still faster than other drivers. Also: record your drive and publish the video, we will see :)
Better go to the test drive and find out an own skin disbeliever🤣.
30km are not long enough to measure consumption tho
Can you explain why?
@@1001cars Over short Distances small influences will have a big influence on the displayed amount. And I am not even talking about, that the Bordcomputer can be up to 0,5l inaccurate. One heave acceleration and you get a whole other number. Theres a reason why most real test are performed for about 300km. Small influences will get cancelled out and the real consumption can be calculated.
I know a lot of TCe 130 owners and no one gets really a 4.2l / 100km consumption. Most are at about 6 to 6.5l. If you are driving really slow and careful maybe 5.7 or something. Thats what I mean, 30km driving around some countryroads is way to inaccurate, even for the trip computer to tell
So, show me REPETEABLE test on 300 km distance. Like, sb. made 3 or even more runs with exact the same number. So, send the link to these "most real test on ~300 km distance", but remember, these test should be repeated with the same result.
Longer distance = more situations which can influence the final result. I made many times the test on 33 distance (this is my typical highway distance) and on the 100 km distance and on the 200 km distance. The result was exactly the same - of course I had to make such test early morning when there was no traffic at all. At least here you see if there was sth. was wrong with the traffic, unnecessary acceleration or anything like that. Can you show me similar movies from 300 km distance?
Second thing: yes, board computer can show incorrect consumption, but if you were present on the math lessons, you know that it is not inaccurate by 0,5 l/100 km (or anything precise number) but by some percent. So, there is no difference between 2% error on 4,5 l/100 km on 30 km distance and 2% error on 4,5 l/100 km on 300 km distance in terms of the difference between board computer and consumption on the fuel station.
If sb. does not know how to drive in eco way, it is not the reason why you can call my test inaccurate or unreal. You even did not check what scenario of driving did they have etc. And you are trying to compare SOME consumption (without any kind of info about driving style etc.) with the consumption shown in this video with specified every detail including recorded every meter of the trip.
Explain, how is it possible: Kona on ~400 km distance and the same Kona on 30 km distance
th-cam.com/video/EIK7ebW5K2U/w-d-xo.html | th-cam.com/video/3DGUEjMMnjE/w-d-xo.html
ID.4 on over 500 km distance: th-cam.com/video/548t8mBbfdo/w-d-xo.html and on 22 km distance: th-cam.com/video/UqfQB3BKkog/w-d-xo.html
@@1001cars absolutely no problem. Look at these guys, unfortunately German but they have lots of cars which they test on 300km and make with each car 3 runs. One at 80km/h, one at 130km/h and one at full speed: th-cam.com/video/1L21yV1jv-Q/w-d-xo.html
absolutely no problem, you did not send any answer to my questions. This movie is good, but it proves what I said, not what you said :)
1st: there is no 3 runs on the same test, only one run, we do not know they repeatability (they even talk about it and they know they cannot make exactly the same test with exactly the same result again)
2nd: they achieved 4,1 l/100 km with the TCe engine which - as you said - is impossible, and "no one gets really a 4,2/100 km", here they got 4,1, so even better. So?