What Makes the EA-18G Growler the King of Electronic Warfare?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 พ.ค. 2023
  • The story of the Growler began in the early 2000s. As the US Navy's EA-6B Prowler fleet, which had been in service since 1971, started showing signs of age and fatigue, a replacement was needed. Thus, the call for a new, more capable electronic attack aircraft was made.
    By September 2007, six EA-18G Growlers had been delivered and were undergoing operational testing.
    The Growler, based on the proven F/A-18F Super Hornet, was more than just a derivative. It was an evolution.
    The cockpit of the Growler is a high-tech space where the pilot and electronic warfare officer work in tandem to operate the aircraft's systems. This aircraft is also fitted with a Joint Helmet-Mounted Cueing System (JHMCS), allowing the pilot to aim sensors and weapons wherever they're looking.
    The electronic warfare suite of the Growler is its true power center. Initially, the suite included up to three AN/ALQ-99 radar jamming pods, an AN/ALQ-218(V)2 receiver, and a Raytheon AN/ALQ-227 communications countermeasures set.
    The Growler can carry AIM-120 AMRAAM and AIM-9X Sidewinder missiles for self-defense, and is equipped with an M61A1 20 mm cannon. The aircraft can also carry AGM-88 High-Speed Anti-Radiation Missiles (HARM) and the advanced AGM-88E Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile (AARGM), both designed to target enemy radar systems. It can carry a range of smart bombs, including laser-guided bombs and GPS-guided Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAM) and can be equipped with the AGM-154 Joint Standoff Weapon (JSOW) and the AGM-84 Harpoon anti-ship missile.
    Join our TH-cam channel by clicking here: bit.ly/3asNo2n
    Find us on Instagram: bit.ly/3PM21xW
    Find us on Facebook: bit.ly/3t2Huvb
    Find us on Twitter: bit.ly/3wQfXzA
    Find us on TikTok: bit.ly/3wNsBOu
    Get the latest stories: interestingengineering.com/
    Support IE for high-quality journalism: interestingengineering.com/su...
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 121

  • @Interestingengineeringofficial
    @Interestingengineeringofficial  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    ⚙ Want to know more about the latest tech and innovations? Don’t Miss Out!
    *SUBSCRIBE & HIT THE BELL* 👉bit.ly/SubscribeNowIE

  • @johnherbold5451
    @johnherbold5451 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +112

    I don't believe that the EA-18G ("Growler") has a 20mm canon like the Super Hornet does. There's no room for it on the Growler!!

    • @katoblow100
      @katoblow100 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      It doesn't. It has no guns whatsoever.

    • @KnightOps290
      @KnightOps290 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Was about to get in the comment section and say this. Lol

    • @fishnchips5826
      @fishnchips5826 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      It doesnt, it has a cover for the gun hole to make it slightly more aerodynamic.

    • @georgen9755
      @georgen9755 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      cutting off communication was a clever way to turn down faculty
      return to sender ? whose post .
      no reply ????
      who answered all the inbox posts of my personal email

  • @WarGasm0824
    @WarGasm0824 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

    They had to ditch the M-61A1 in favor of electronic warfare equipment. It can fly unescorted because it can carry the AIM-9X high off boresight Sidewinder and AIM-120D AMRAAM Scorpion.

    • @brett327
      @brett327 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      No AIM-9X on Growler... not yet, anyway.

    • @alexandermetcalfe7750
      @alexandermetcalfe7750 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@brett327 The Aussies fly with the 9X, interestingly enough, because they paid for the testing. We, however, still do not.

  • @liamlogan669
    @liamlogan669 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    "We do a microscopic amount of trolling" - EA18 Growler Pilot and Electronic Warfare Officer

  • @Edgeverse
    @Edgeverse ปีที่แล้ว +25

    It looks so similar to the F-18. What a beast!

    • @nisarullah2969
      @nisarullah2969 ปีที่แล้ว

      Send it to Ukraine if it servy then approved and tested. If it met the same fate as patriot missiles system then toy jet.

    • @Edgeverse
      @Edgeverse ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@nisarullah2969 Perhaps that wouldn't be the best option? Maybe what Ukraine really needs is one of the Eurofighters like the Grippen or the JAAS 39.

    • @angusmatheson8906
      @angusmatheson8906 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​​@@nisarullah2969
      🤡 💩 🇷🇺 💩 🤡
      lmao wut? Ukraine hasn't lost even a single element of any of its Patriot batteries.
      Stop listening to Peskov.
      Idi nahui, Cyka Ruz katsap orc scum.
      Slava Ukraini 🇺🇦 🇺🇦 🇺🇦 Heroyam Slava!!

    • @fishnchips5826
      @fishnchips5826 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@nisarullah2969 the growler have been serving in multiple conflict. What other prove do you need?

    • @angrymitch1566
      @angrymitch1566 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@nisarullah2969you mean the patriot system that’s still there and functioning? Congrats you hit one piece of a multi piece air defense system

  • @chuckdales5605
    @chuckdales5605 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    This is one good-looking aircraft!

    • @trippleoseven
      @trippleoseven 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ugly plane imo

    • @Warhorse469
      @Warhorse469 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I agree it's a very good-looking aircraft

  • @dougaldouglas8842
    @dougaldouglas8842 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Should do one on the Euro Fighter Typhoon, and what a beast.

    • @Interestingengineeringofficial
      @Interestingengineeringofficial  ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Thanks for the recommendation! The Eurofighter Typhoon is definitely a remarkable aircraft known for its impressive capabilities. We'll consider creating a video to highlight its features.

    • @dougaldouglas8842
      @dougaldouglas8842 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Interestingengineeringofficial Many thanks for kind reply. I only mention this fighter plane as I used to go to air shows, and the most impressive of all aircraft was the Eurofighter.
      The roar, when taking off, was astounding.

    • @aldionsylkaj9654
      @aldionsylkaj9654 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Interestingengineeringofficial please do!

    • @TheRpg1964
      @TheRpg1964 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Way too expensive compared to an F-358 if you are outside the overinflated European theatre!

  • @whalehands4779
    @whalehands4779 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Besides the f35, i think this is the most potent aircraft in the sky. Imagine if the AF did this with the f15ex.

    • @moonasha
      @moonasha 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      seriously, it makes me nervous we don't really have a replacement in the works for the growler.

  • @user-vq8xw7fh4r
    @user-vq8xw7fh4r 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Extra-outstanding Us. 🦅 Force superiority innovation ! Dale 🦅

  • @smeary10
    @smeary10 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Flown and operated by only two nations. The US and Australia.

  • @johngodden4363
    @johngodden4363 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Understand Australia has 11 growlers currently. The twelfth caught fire during training exercises. Also believe another five are on order.

    • @JimOHalloran
      @JimOHalloran 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      When the Australian government was looking to buy Super Hornets and Growlers to replace the F-111 and bridge the gap until F-35 deliveries started the plan was to buy 24 F-18F Super Hornets, half of which would be pre-wired for conversion to Growlers in the future. In the end though, all 24 Supers were left as Supers, and the RAAF decided to buy an additional 12 new build Growlers. One of which (311) caught fire on takeoff during a Red Flag exercises in the US and it was replaced by a new aircraft that the US Navy had in storage (313). There are no more growlers on order to the best of my knowledge.

  • @brianjohnson8745
    @brianjohnson8745 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    they deleted the gun, big guy.
    don't be lazy and leave the video up.
    someone told you three months ago.
    you have 1M subs. you're gonna be fine.
    fly fight win

  • @alexandermetcalfe7750
    @alexandermetcalfe7750 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The cockpit layout information at 3:30 was very wrong, the display and caution light layout in either cockpit is nothing like that. Notably, only the EWO has the 8x10, which we like to call "the jumbotron".

  • @acupofsoda2443
    @acupofsoda2443 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Shit that was a hard landing

  • @josemoreno3334
    @josemoreno3334 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cool.

  • @chrismair8161
    @chrismair8161 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Energy!

  • @GrowlerJams
    @GrowlerJams 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Please remove my content from this video immediately, or I will file a copyright claim against you. You are using clips from two of my videos without permission.

    • @hermanmusimbi4337
      @hermanmusimbi4337 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      dude, Its transformative. You'd lose the DMCA in a heart beat.

    • @speciukas_gaming
      @speciukas_gaming 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      skill issue

    • @frostedbutts4340
      @frostedbutts4340 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      stay mad

  • @AnTiThesis-HaT-HoT
    @AnTiThesis-HaT-HoT 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why does UK not have these?

  • @chak2822
    @chak2822 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The growler and all other jets, ARE STILL BIG, I thought they were tiny, not at all they are big planes still

  • @lakedude5961
    @lakedude5961 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I believe the gun is missing on the ea-18

    • @Interestingengineeringofficial
      @Interestingengineeringofficial  ปีที่แล้ว +4

      You're right that the EA-18G Growler doesn't feature an integrated gun. This omission is intentional, as its primary focus is on electronic warfare capabilities rather than close-in combat or self-defense.

    • @drumsoccer100
      @drumsoccer100 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@Interestingengineeringofficial Then take it out of your description...

  • @Angry.General1461
    @Angry.General1461 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It's just an F-18 carrying a heavier load. They should have kept the F-14 in service!

    • @moonasha
      @moonasha 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      this has literally nothing to do with an F-14 it fulfills an entirely different role, an extremely important one I might add.

  • @RiMajol8081
    @RiMajol8081 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Watching this 02/02/2024. U.S. just launched airstrikes using EA18 Growler to jam enemy radars.

  • @creolespanish34
    @creolespanish34 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So, if these guys had the enemy's COs phone numbers, they could send them personalized gifts, provided they forget to turn off their devices on the battlefield

  • @TheRpg1964
    @TheRpg1964 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Did anybody know that Australia also operates the EA-18G? Probably not!

  • @Msit508
    @Msit508 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You Doffe not help me
    I can understand all Suppy program😮😢

  • @NCmtnDweller
    @NCmtnDweller 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Americana !!

  • @mbmann3892
    @mbmann3892 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    :29 That was a hard landing .

    • @sidharthcs2110
      @sidharthcs2110 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That's how the Navy lands

    • @alexandermetcalfe7750
      @alexandermetcalfe7750 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Navy ain't got time to flare. Recongize the city in the background? The casinos are waiting!

  • @johnblaesel5493
    @johnblaesel5493 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Never heard of the EA-18G Growler.

    • @IndiaMikePapa
      @IndiaMikePapa 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You heard it here first!

    • @johnblaesel5493
      @johnblaesel5493 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@IndiaMikePapa I guess so and I certainly wouldn't want that thing growling at me!

    • @annazavarzina6145
      @annazavarzina6145 หลายเดือนก่อน

      When you hear something you never heard before flying over your head, it could be another time. 🙂 I thought the end of the world happened. I grew right into the pavement. 😁

  • @Msit508
    @Msit508 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    2013

  • @jimclarke1108
    @jimclarke1108 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Top secret😁

  • @well-blazeredman6187
    @well-blazeredman6187 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I wonder how the capabilities of the Growler compare with what the Israeli Air Force can do.

    • @smeary10
      @smeary10 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Never underestimate the Israelis.

    • @brett327
      @brett327 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Israel doesn’t have a tactical airborne Electronic Attack platform.

    • @IndiaMikePapa
      @IndiaMikePapa 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@brett327they do, the F-35…

    • @brett327
      @brett327 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      F-35 is not a tactical Jx platform like Growler, though it does have some very limited Jx capabilities. Growler and F-35 work together as a team to achieve the desired effect.@@IndiaMikePapa

  • @Msit508
    @Msit508 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    2x more then

  • @Msit508
    @Msit508 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Electronic (2013)

  • @atlet1
    @atlet1 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    False! Others have commented at some false claims. Growler is not unique. Russia have similar capabilities. Gripen E have all capabilities of Growler plus M2, supercruise, long range, high agility, high availability, low visibility, GaN tech, spherical action EW, multifunctional stealthy broadband radio link to other airplanes and two other radio links for the rest of the military force. It's a omni role fighter that can do ever mission very good, even in the same flight. Everything is built in, except long wavelength EW pod and RECCE pod.

  • @spiff1003
    @spiff1003 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    0:28... Naval aviators can't land (flare) if they tried to! :D

  • @AnonymousAlcoholic772
    @AnonymousAlcoholic772 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wait, the plane has a range of 975 miles and a max speed of 1600 miles per hour? So at cruising speed it can loiter for an hour? Wtf? Has to be a mistake

    • @kacpertokarz8268
      @kacpertokarz8268 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Sounds about right, on full afterburner at max speed a fighter jet will burn through all it's fuel in like 10 minutes. Cruising they typically only get a couple hours without adding external fuel tanks.

    • @AnonymousAlcoholic772
      @AnonymousAlcoholic772 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@kacpertokarz8268 thats with external tanks

    • @kacpertokarz8268
      @kacpertokarz8268 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@AnonymousAlcoholic772oh if that's with external tanks then that seems incorrect, I would imagine it would be over double that.

    • @AnonymousAlcoholic772
      @AnonymousAlcoholic772 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@kacpertokarz8268 ya cant be right.

    • @SuperEdge67
      @SuperEdge67 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Its max speed is Mach 1.6 not 1600 mph. Mach 1 is the speed of sound. The speed of sound is much much slower than 1000 miles per hour.

  • @brett327
    @brett327 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So much bad info in this video. Growler doesn’t have a gun, nor can it carry any AIM-9 variant.

  • @novemberzed9163
    @novemberzed9163 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    EW might have worked against smaller, less developed countries that divided states has terrorized, but it wont work against Russia and China who have their own electronic warfare and jamming means.
    That's why divided states cant send em to elenski, cause they would be wrecked over there, and they wouldnt be able to pick up the pieces of them.

    • @smeary10
      @smeary10 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Not sure about that. That's not why they're not sent into the Ukraine. The US or Australia (the only two countries that have Growlers) can't be seen sending such technology into that theater of war. Especially as only US and Aussie aircrew can ever operate them due to the years of training required.

    • @novemberzed9163
      @novemberzed9163 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@smeary10 They wont send em because they would get wrecked. Regardless of who pilots them. Survivability would be very low.

    • @CherryColaWizard
      @CherryColaWizard 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Any nation that has electronic equipment is vulnerable to EW, included China and Russia. What makes you think they can't also be jammed?

    • @smeary10
      @smeary10 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      you never send Growlers in alone so that's a moot point. @@novemberzed9163

    • @verdebusterAP
      @verdebusterAP 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      How about no
      Russia's EW is geting picked apart in Ukraine, more the point, Russia's lack of EW is why they are getting their asses handed to them
      One of the tricks that US developed with EA-6B and EA-18G is the ability to track radio sources in real time
      By positioning aircraft at key points, they can locate targets by emission and track them in real time
      if Russia had that capability, HIMARS would have been destroy with in a matter of weeks
      Yet its been nearly 2 years and not one lost
      More the point, If Russia had that capability, they would easily picked apart the equipment sent by the west
      yet we are two years into it
      and nada

  • @HappyTime-nb6of
    @HappyTime-nb6of 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    only united states and australia have these. . :)

  • @touchofgrey5372
    @touchofgrey5372 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's hard to believe that in this day and age there is still someone who does not know the correct pronunciation of MACH!
    It's Mock 1.. as in Mockingbird!

  • @AndrewLambert-wi8et
    @AndrewLambert-wi8et 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Russia is king of electronic warfare. Proven on several occasions. Next is France. I could be wrong in both cases.

    • @aliciadurant2883
      @aliciadurant2883 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      T’abuse un peu… on a aucun équivalent en france

    • @AchwaqKhalid
      @AchwaqKhalid 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Genuinely curious to know why you mentioned France 🤔
      Never heard of any EW system coming from there

    • @GroundZeroTactical
      @GroundZeroTactical 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      🤣

    • @mejestic124
      @mejestic124 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They don't even have high end electronic manufacturing capability so how would they be in the top game?

    • @g-money1723
      @g-money1723 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You are wrong. Lol

  • @SuperiorAmericanGuy
    @SuperiorAmericanGuy 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Give Ukraine some of those types of jets to counter those sukhoi terror jets of evil soviet Russia.

    • @mikedavis199
      @mikedavis199 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Ukraine does not need, nor do they deserve these. Most of the jamming capabilities of these are still classified. Why would we give them to an army that barely even has an airforce? They'd get shot down because they don't know how to fly them

    • @SuperiorAmericanGuy
      @SuperiorAmericanGuy 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Would you recommend giving Ukraine other weapons then?

    • @mikedavis199
      @mikedavis199 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@SuperiorAmericanGuy Nope. It's not our war to fight. I'm tired of seeing handouts to that country when the gear we CURRENTLY field is all half broken. 7 Years in the Marine Corps and I can count on one hand the number of "New" items I got issued at CIF. Why are we giving them our best when we aren't even getting it?

    • @SuperiorAmericanGuy
      @SuperiorAmericanGuy 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ukraine didn’t attack first Russia did. Those Soviets want to rebuild the Soviet Union by exterminating Ukraine and america plus those commies made illegal terror weapons: T-14, Kirov, that Russian carrier of theirs, typhoons, Akulas and Su-57 terror jets.

    • @gabriel-kn1bl
      @gabriel-kn1bl 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@mikedavis199So the US soldiers won't have the need to fight the Russians is Ukraine can destroy most of them.

  • @motorcyclematthew5741
    @motorcyclematthew5741 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fake news 😂

    • @interesting5638
      @interesting5638 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The growler is no joke it’s proven to be more powerful than the German/Italian Tornado ECR

  • @eseetoh
    @eseetoh ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Really no gun? Then it's truly wasted to use this platform for EW when it has no close-in self defense ability. Better to use a non combatant platform instead.

    • @Interestingengineeringofficial
      @Interestingengineeringofficial  ปีที่แล้ว +10

      The EA-18G Growler is specifically designed for electronic warfare, focusing on disrupting enemy radar and communications systems rather than close-in self-defense. Its role as an electronic warfare platform maximizes its effectiveness in that domain.

    • @LoudestHoward
      @LoudestHoward 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      It has AMRAAMs to defend itself, the gun is gone because it's got more electronics in the nose.

    • @eseetoh
      @eseetoh 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@LoudestHoward now that makes sense.

    • @philduoos2961
      @philduoos2961 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Interestingengineeringofficial I was just reading about the earlier version - the Prowler. No Prowler had ever been shot down in its 30+ years of service (with no guns).

    • @drumsoccer100
      @drumsoccer100 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.

  • @edwardcook2973
    @edwardcook2973 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Still not as good as the Prowler.